Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
And now we can start.
So, welcome Mr. Harari or or may I say
Yuval? Yuval is fine, perfectly.
Yuval, I'm honored and excited to have
the opportunity this evening to uh
to pick your brain, but also hopefully
to get to know you a little better. Um
get to know the man behind the books and
uh the lectures. And and I understand
I'm just in time Mhm. cuz before we
started this interview told me that
coming Sunday you're leaving for your
your annual off-the-grid retreat
meditation.
I'm going for 2 months meditation. Yeah.
But it's also 2 months of not talking at
all? Uh complete silent. I'm not talking
to people and no phones and no
computers, no books, no writing, no
nothing. Yeah. Uh you know, to detoxify
the mind. Yes.
Oh, yeah.
So, no talking. So, don't hold back now.
You can still You can still talk. You
get every opportunity in the next what?
90 minutes. Um and without I mean I I
didn't want to dive too deep right away
into the details of meditation because I
hope we'll Yeah, we'll get to that
later.
We'll get to that later probably, but I
I did wonder what you miss the most when
you're away for those 60 days. Is it Is
it your husband? Yes. Oh, no. No, no. I
wanted I wanted to give you three
options.
Oh, okay. Okay. But it's really sweet
that you said yes right away.
No, I wanted to say is it your husband,
your cell phone, or your dog? I don't
have a cell phone.
Uh it's it's definitely my husband. I
mean, my dog is currently he is 14 and
he has cancer and he seems to be in his
last days. So, it's it's really kind of
I hope it'll it'll it'll wait until I
come back from the meditation retreat.
He's doing well now. He's he's taking
these cannabis drops. I mean, he's not
taking it. We we are giving it to him.
Wait, you're giving weed to your dog?
Not weed. It's you know, it's the the
extract the the medicinal
the oil, yeah. Yeah, yeah, Yeah, And
he's not smoking, you
They're not rolling him joints, no.
No, and uh we we just kind of spray it
on on on on his food and he he and it it
really improves his his condition.
Really? Uh I it seems so. And there is
no placebo effect with dogs. So
that would be funny though, placebo
effect in dogs that you're telling him
this really works and then he thinks,
"Yeah, you're right.
Yeah." Yeah. Yeah, so 60 days of no
talking
um and we are now we are we're setting
off on a journey through your head
basically and and and through your life
and to do so we've asked you to pick a
handful of uh movies, TV series that are
meaningful to you in one way or another
um
and I happen to know that watching TV
series is one of the main hobbies of you
and your husband, right?
Yes.
But are you typical binge watchers? No,
I mean he tends to be more of a binge-y
type. I tend to be like, "Oh, we need to
digest this episode before we move to
the to the next one." So there is often
a conversation around it. So we often
end up watching two episodes in a row.
Okay, so not the whole season in one
night. I mean we just yesterday night we
watched the first episode of Succession
of the new Ooh, the new the third
season. It's amazing. I mean it's so
good. It's like Shakespeare for the 21st
century. I haven't gotten a chance yet.
I had to watch all the the the the
movies that you are going to discuss
this evening. Yeah.
Um how about we take a look at the first
clip you selected. It's an educational
children's cartoon series from late
'70s.
I think even early '70s. I watched it in
the like late '70s, early '80s when I
was 4 5 years old and it kind of
completely blew my mind.
Yeah, we were born in the same year, 19
'76.
'76. I also watched it as a kid. Mhm. Um
it's um I mean when I watch it now, I'm
surprised again and again that some of
the things I write today in my books and
I think that oh, this is something I
just thought about like today or or this
year. And then I watch it, and I know it
was already there when I was like 5
years old, it was on TV. You basically
plagiarized it. Yes.
Maybe unconsciously Unconsciously.
Unconsciously from your childhood.
Because it's a series about the history
of humanity.
It's originally French, entitled Il
รฉtait une fois l'homme, which means once
upon a time men. Um
why why why do you want to kick off with
it without
giving away the full story?
It it it inspired my my love of history.
Mhm.
And as I said, it really blew my mind
that you know, I mean
to
as a kid trying to understand the world,
why is the world the way it is?
And then you watch it, and it tells you
that the world wasn't always like this.
It was completely different.
And how things keep changing over time.
And it I think it shaped to to large
extent my view of the world. And
it has I think I I I don't know, you
know, it's difficult to put a number on
it, but I I credit it to some extent
with my becoming a historian. Wow. So
basically this is the origin of Yuval
Harari. As a historian, yes. As a
historian, yes.
Wow. Once upon a time men.
First of all, pretty harsh scene for a
vegan.
I wasn't vegan then. No, you're No, not
as a kid. Yeah, right. And well, then
then the cat's out of the bag. This is
where you got your information
from. Millions of readers all over the
world wonder where does he get his
information from. At least some of it. I
mean watching it now, I mean again, it's
I mean it's so sexist.
There are there are no women. There
there is just this one woman who does
nothing throughout the whole thing
except cooking. They hand out the food.
They hand out the food, and that's it.
Even in the Even in the '70s, history
was written by men.
Yes, still. Still. Um but but but still,
I mean, it's it's such a rich
show Yeah, cuz what makes it so good for
you?
You know, it It starts with evolution,
which, you know, growing up in in Israel
in the 1980s was not obvious. We still
don't really teach evolution in in in
school. So, you know, watching this kind
of a powerful image or a powerful
narrative that sticks in the mind.
And also, you know, the basic
understanding that humans are animals.
That still most people reject. Most
people around the world today.
Yeah. And so, you were not taught that
as a young boy. No, I mean, we were
taught the Bible.
Okay.
I mean, I come from a secular family,
and I went to a secular school, but
still in a secular school in Israel, you
learn like tons and tons of Bible. You
don't learn evolution. But you don't
learn anything about dinosaurs or
fossils or
You know, dinosaurs, kids love
dinosaurs. You probably hear about
dinosaurs. But, you know, the the whole
process of evolution and where we human
beings came from and ancient human
species, maybe it was mentioned here and
there, but you get far more Bible
than that. But what did you think then
when you watched this? You're like,
"Wait a minute. No one's telling me
about this."
I'm not sure. I mean, you know, I mean,
the world is so complicated when you're
five. I mean, it's still complicated
even today. But you Just to make sense
of it. And you get so many different
points of views and stories that don't
really add up. So, it took me
many many years to integrate the
different narratives that I heard from
different places. Yeah. And uh also to
discard some of these narratives. Like
to understand that the the the Bible is
just it's not the the history of
humanity, it's just a story that some
humans invented 3,000 years ago and
became extremely powerful and and and
successful, but it's it's just a story.
And your parents did not at least did
not forbid you to watch
No, absolutely not. No, again, I came
from a secular family. They were very
much in favor of of of this. But um
again, you go to school
and the and until today, you learn
mainly Israeli history and Jewish
history. You you learn again, you learn
an awful lot of Bible, but even in
history class, it's mostly you know,
you don't have anything about China. You
don't learn anything about, I don't
know, the agricultural revolution.
You learn something about the Roman
Empire, but mostly what did the Romans
do to us?
And then you learn about the French
Revolution, it's mainly about what
happened to the Jews in the French
Revolution. So But every country has
their tunnel vision, right?
Yes, absolutely. I in lower school
school, I learned about, you know, how
great the East India companies were,
right? Yeah. So, but this to you was a
source of proper information.
And especially
maybe didn't realize it back then, but
you realize it later. Yes, it's kind of
an an alternative
understanding
of the world that with time became more
and more convincing and powerful and and
rich.
Yeah. And it's accurate as I understand
you. Correct? It's as accurate as an
animation series for for little kids can
be. Of course, it's not I mean, if you
go now to the latest findings, no, it's
not 100% accurate, but as an initial
view
of of evolution and history, it's it's
surprisingly good. Sufficient. Yeah, and
it raises some of and
many cases in many cases when you deal
with with kind of these big narratives
the real question is what are the
questions?
That okay, that the answers that are
being given, they are corrected over
time. You have new archaeological
findings and new historical theories and
so forth. That you know, people in the
70s didn't know that Neanderthals and
Homo sapiens had sex and even had
children together. They thought they
were two different
They thought they were two different
species and then the Neanderthals
disappeared. And this is what you see in
in in in in the episode. Now we know
from genetic evidence that yes,
something like 50,000 years ago some
Neanderthals had sex with some sapiens
and most of us have some Neanderthal
DNA. It's like 2%
2%, 3%, % something like that. Yeah. Now
because I wanted to to quote something
from this particular episode because the
voice over says chances are slim
Cro-Magnon men descended from
Neanderthal men. Mhm. Since the two
lived side by side for 5,000 years,
cousin or conqueror, Cro-Magnon men did
win out in the end. Mhm. So well
obviously now we don't we don't call it
Cro-Magnon men. Yeah, I mean
anymore. the the
the the terminology changes, some of the
details change, but what I said is is
again the questions are the important
ones.
Yeah. But does does this clip give us
any clues on why we came to conquer the
planet?
First of all, again, it asks the
question, why did our species of humans
conquer the planet?
Yeah. Which is a very important
question. First of all, to realize that
there were different species
and secondly, to
this basic question of why we dominate
the planet
Yeah. we get different answers to it.
But do we get an answer in this scene,
you think?
Yes. And it's it's basically still the
answer that I give in Sapiens, that it's
cooperation. You have the scene when
there is the mammoth
group, the the group of mammoth and the
tribe and the bands join together in
order to cooperate to hunt the mammoth
and this is also the the the answer that
I gave in Sapiens that the real secret
of success of our species, our source of
power is not that we are individually
smarter or more creative, nothing like
that. It's that we are the only mammals
that are capable of cooperation in large
numbers. You know, chimpanzees and and
elephants and and wolves and dogs, they
can cooperate in small numbers. They
they are in packs. Yeah. So, the
chimpanzees can cooperate say 50
chimpanzees, a hundred chimpanzees
because cooperation among them depends
on intimately knowing each other.
Chimpanzees also hunt, but to go hunting
with you, I need to know you personally.
What kind of chimpanzee are you? Are you
nice? Can I trust you? Now, the
the thing about Homo sapiens, we have
this amazing ability to cooperate with
complete strangers.
And this is why we can cooperate
basically in unlimited numbers. If you
look at the world today, so at least in
the economic sphere, we have a network
of cooperation of almost 8 billion
people. Like this shirt that I'm
wearing, it was produced by somebody in
Vietnam or Guatemala that I've never
met. But this network of cooperation
brings me my shirt. And this goes back
to
tens of thousands of years ago
when Sapiens first acquired this ability
to cooperate in large numbers and this
is our this is why we managed to
push aside or exterminate the
Neanderthals.
That we actually Neanderthals had bigger
brains than us and individually they
were physically probably more powerful
and also intellectually there are
reasons to think that they were not
inferior to us. But they did not
cooperate as well. As far as we know,
they couldn't they cooperate on on the
level of bands of say again 20 15
Neanderthals. Sapiens could cooperate in
hundreds and thousands and it doesn't
just mean that you know this image of a
big battle that a thousand Sapiens
versus 15 Neanderthals. It's much more
than that. It's networks of exchanging
information, exchanging ideas. If you
discover a new herb that can cure an
illness, then you tell it to all the
other bands in in the area. And if
somebody discovers a new method to to
produce a knife or to hunt a mammoth or
anything else.
of mouth to mouth advertising. Exactly.
And and this is the the the deep source
of of our power, the ability to
cooperate in very large numbers.
It's funny how you mentioned the word
battle
cuz I
I wanted to suggest we go
to the next clip. Yeah. As a historian,
you initially specialized in medieval
military history.
More specifically logistics. Logistics,
yeah. Logistics. I was I like my I like
my my master's thesis was like the most
boring thing in the world. It was about
medieval logistical systems of how do
you feed an army on the march? How many
calories does a does a medieval knight
consume and how much fodder each horse
eats? And what do you get the fodder?
And like if you go on a campaign and you
need to bring fodder for the horses, so
you you have a cart and you put the
fodder in it, but then you need horses
to pull the cart. For something boring,
you make it sound pretty exciting. It
You know, I worked on it for like two
years. Um
in this regard, you want us to show
a military battle Yes. from the HBO
series Game of Thrones.
I'm not even going to try to explain
who's fighting whom.
If you didn't see the show you Right. I
mean, I watched all the episodes cuz I'm
a fan, but even I I mean get frustrated
sometimes by keeping you know, track of
who's who and who's belling who and
who's trying to kill whom, etc.
All you need to know or all the viewer
needs to know is that there's the one
guy, the handsome Jon Snow. He's talking
to some other guy. He's the leader of
the moral
Of the wildlings.
The wildlings. The Scots basically who
live on the north beyond the anarchistic
posse and then some other, you know,
power-driven king barges in and and
tries to take over.
Game of Thrones.
Why did you take us to the continent of
Westeros and particularly to this scene?
Well, I mean
as I said originally I specialized in
medieval military history
and even more specifically in in
logistics. And you know, I watch this
and I live I I like Game of Thrones very
much, but I I I I I sit and cringe, you
know, because I this is so
unscientific. What you see here is
they're in the middle of nowhere,
somewhere in the frozen north and
suddenly out of nowhere appears this
huge army of Stannis Baratheon
and surprises them.
And this is just absolutely impossible.
I mean, I'm watching it and I'm
thinking, how did they supply the
horses? Where did they get the fodder?
It's The food, yeah.
The food for the horses, for the men.
Usually in a medieval army, the the the
the most common way is to just rob the
the villages.
You you pass through a country and you
just take the the the the bread, the
chickens, the eggs, the fodder to feed
your army, but there are no villages.
They are in the frozen north. So, the
other in in this situation what medieval
armies do is you bring a supply train
with you. But a supply train is very
slow
and it's you know, it's it's pulled by
oxen and and and by by by horses and and
things like that. It's very difficult to
move the huge army through this kind of
of territory. They've never been there.
So, they they shouldn't they don't know
the land. And if they try to move a huge
army with its supply train, there is no
way that the native wildlings would have
missed it.
I mean, how can they be surprised? It's
sitting on the couch watching your
favorite series and then cringing
because it's not accurate. Is that
correct? Uh in in a way because it's
something that is very close to home,
medieval logistics. I get it, but it's
like watching the Muppet Show and then
getting angry because frogs can't
actually talk.
No, but but but it's it's kind of you
know
to it it conveys
a a deeply wrong view of I mean
What people often don't understand about
history is the logistics. It's how
complicated it is to do simple things
like move an army.
And this is for instance what feeds into
conspiracy theories.
You know, the biggest problem with
conspiracy theories is that they
underestimate the complexity of the
world. Like they imagine that you can
control the world by you know, you get a
bunch of billionaires sitting in in
around a table like this.
Just a few Rothchilds and
Yeah, and and they release epidemics and
they start wars and the logistics
doesn't work.
No. Because yes, you can start a war,
there is no way you can predict the
outcome.
Uh you know, you a real conspiracy is
something like the American invasion of
Iraq.
That went completely off the tracks.
Because there were no weapons of mass
destruction.
No, not not just that. I mean, you have
the biggest superpower in the world
invading this third world third rate
country
and it goes completely
in an unexpected direction. The country
which probably benefited most from the
American invasion is Iran. Yes. And then
how it really happens in history because
on the ground things get messy.
And the plans you make in your head, oh,
we land in the port and we I'll I'll
I'll move my huge army over the frozen
ice and surprise them, it just doesn't
work in in practice because oh, but what
we the horses don't have enough to eat.
Yeah. And therefore you do accept the
fact that there's actually ice zombies
and dragons. I don't like the ice
zombies and dragons, but I you know, but
that's okay. So this is kind of the this
is the the the the their stick. The let
there be ice zombies. But um But at
least have a proper
you know, view on a proper display of
how armies move. Yes, because this is
something a for me which is more basic
to understand the complexity of
historical processes
and it has a bearing on how people
understand events today. Yeah. But you
know, the zombies, people see it on
television and hopefully they know that
there are no zombies.
But when they see the movement of armies
they tend to think, well, this is this
is much more accurate than zombies and
they they
they kind of use this to understand how
military events actually happen in the
world whether in the Middle Ages or or
today. Yeah. And this distorts our
understanding of history. It is
portrayed or it is described as a
medieval, it's set in medieval times or
it has this medieval Yes, feel.
Absolutely.
That's That's what I was looking for.
But what what makes it medieval? The
castles and the swords and you know, the
technology is basically medieval, the
outlook, all the kind of chivalrous
culture, and you have kings and you
know,
certainly in Europe when you think in
terms of of an ill-defined time or
legend time or primordial time, it's
always the Middle Ages. If you even you
think about the Smurfs, the Smurfs are
basically in the Middle Ages.
That they live in the village and there
is the nobleman in the castle and If I
was writing an article, this would be
the headline. The Smurfs are actually in
No, but I think this is this is well
known. You know, because
you don't see Greek a Greek city with
all kinds of elections and the forum and
then no.
Usually legend time is the Middle Ages.
That is so funny. Never realized that.
Because most of our legends except for
you know, for for the Bible and stuff,
they come from the Middle Ages. So
storytelling for us too as well.
Yeah, all the children's fairy tales,
they're about princesses and princes,
not about consuls and praetors. Yeah.
Yeah.
Let's move on to another fairy tale.
Money. The biggest of them all.
Um The Big Short, the true story about
how the financial crisis of 2007-2008
was triggered by the United States
housing bubble.
Um one unique aspect of this film is
that some actors will break the
so-called fourth wall uh to directly
address the audience and explain
complicated financial products um such
as um what's it called? CDOs, CDUs,
something like that. Synthetic CDOs. Hm.
Uh disconcerting to say the least.
Um this guy, the investment adviser,
says society values me very much. How
come people put so much faith and money
into
in into an obvious pipe dream?
Well, that's the basis of of the whole
of history, of the whole of society. I
mean, we talked earlier about how we
rule the world and not the Neanderthals
because we can cooperate in very large
numbers, including with complete
strangers, like the people who made this
shirt.
Now, the next question is what makes it
possible? What How come we can do it and
the chimpanzees can't? And the answer is
stories.
Uh fictional stories. At the basis of
every large-scale cooperation, there is
a fictional story. Now, it's very clear
in the case of religions that, you know,
a billion people can cooperate and build
cathedrals and synagogues or or go on on
crusades and jihads because they all
believe the same fictional story that if
you die in this holy war, after you die,
you go to heaven and Yeah, you have all
the virgins that you want.
Yeah, and you know, for millions of
years you'll enjoy all the best things.
No chimpanzee will ever believe that.
You can't convince a group of
chimpanzees to go fight another group of
chimpanzees by telling them, "Yeah, you
know, if you die, you get to chimpanzee
heaven and there you have lots and lots
of bananas and coconuts and whatever you
want." No chimpanzee will believe that.
In the same way, I cannot convince a
chimpanzee to give me all his bananas
and say
For a piece of paper.
in a week you'll get
the double the bananas.
Not in a week. No. Right now, I'll give
you this green piece of paper if you
give me your banana. Yeah.
No chimpanzee will agree. No. But humans
agree to it. This is why we can have
trade networks. This is why I can wear a
shirt that somebody on the other side of
the world has produced. Because we all
believe I mean, the greatest story ever
told is not the Bible. It's not about
gods. It's not No, the greatest story
ever told is money. You know, the the
biggest Nobel Prize in literature that
should be awarded is not to the people
who write books, it's to the people who
create money.
Uh it's the only story everybody
believes.
Do we know who
invented
Well, money? First of all, we need to
understand what what money is. And and
and this it's a wonderful way that they
presented it. Money
people think that money is is
materialistic. You know, it's kind of
matter. It's It's But money is actually
one of the most
spiritual or mental things in the world.
It doesn't exist anywhere except in our
imagination, in our mind. It's
completely non-materialistic
and it's actually made of trust. You you
know, the equation basically is money
equals trust. The thing you make money
out of is trust. So, initially
there wasn't a lot of trust between
people, between strangers. So, the first
type of money that we know about for
sure was created in ancient Mesopotamia
around 5,000 years ago and it was just
barley. Grain. Oh, barley. Yeah.
Grain. Grain. Um food. Food. And this
was the first money because people
didn't trust each other enough or the
system. So, the money was something you
can actually eat. Yeah, makes sense.
If Yeah, I mean if if everything I don't
know, like the the the global financial
meltdown, okay, I have my barley. I'll
eat it.
Um but then the next stage was gold.
And the amazing thing about gold, gold
has absolutely no value whatsoever
except in the mind.
eat it. You can't eat it.
Uh you can't make useful things from it.
You know, iron, you can make an axe. You
can make a plow. You can make a knife.
Gold is a very soft metal. It's not good
for any of these things. The only thing
you make of it is status symbols, like
crowns and jewelry and and and and and
statues of your gods. And money. So,
it's putting your trust not in the gold
but actually in other people because the
value of the coin comes from the fact
that other people also value it.
And then it moved to paper.
That Oh, well, why do we need this this
cumbersome gold? We can just shift to
paper.
yeah.
Yeah, it's it's much easier and it's the
same principle. The the the value of the
pay It has no value in itself. It's just
if everybody believes the story that the
the the bankers come and tell us, "You
know, this green piece of paper, it's
worth a banana."
If you believe it and I believe it and
the people in the supermarket believe
it, it works. I can go to the
supermarket, give this worthless piece
of paper and get a banana.
And then it moved to the next stage,
which is digital. Most money today in
the world is not even paper. If you take
all the papers and coins, it's less than
10%.
It's only
basically data in computers being moved
around. Like, how did this shirt get to
me? I moved some bits in a computer from
this file to that file.
You ordered it online and Yeah, and then
the people got paid and digitally. And
you know, during the the current crisis,
governments have have have created
trillions, not millions, trillions of
euros and yens and and dollars. And how
do they do it? It's not like in the
1920s that you have printing presses
working all day. No, you
The president just goes to this guy and
tells him, "Okay, go into the file in
the computer
and wherever it's written, I don't know,
five trillion, delete the five and write
six." And that's it. And that's also
what we see happening in The Big Short,
right? There is a myth and then we start
piling up other myths on top of it.
They're creating money out of nothing
just by this kind of system of trust,
which most of the time works until it
doesn't.
Yeah. And we were watching the clip and
then you also said to me, like, this was
actually the first time I understood
Yeah. what they
What's a synthetic CDO? It brought down
the global economy. There was another a
in The Big Short that struck me and
because we discussed earlier
this evening how you were you were
brought up in a more secular family,
right? But the school you went to was
you had there was Bible study.
It was also a secular school.
a secular school but the Bible was very
much
was everywhere. Yeah, cuz there's a
scene in The Big Short that
where the rabbi complains to we saw
Steve Carell also in this scene. His
character is Mark Baum and then the
rabbi complains to Mark Baum's mother
that Mark Baum as a young boy is trying
to find inconsistencies in the word of
God.
I I mean, does it sound familiar to you?
Is that something you did as a boy?
Um
Yes, I mean I it's I mean from quite an
early age I understood that
the Bible was not exactly the the truth,
the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth. I remember it was like
six or seven and I was asked, maybe it
was in class, maybe it was by some
family gathering, I mean, who who who
was the first the first person, the
first people?
And the person expected I would say Adam
and Eve because this is what we learned
in in in school and in in Bible. And I
said Peking Man because I just read that
about, you know, this was back in the in
in the '80s and I just read this, I
don't know, this book that said that
discussed Peking Man.
Peking Man, right? And then an
archaeological finding from China that
was like 1.7 million or 1.5 million
years old and I knew that it's much
older than Adam and Eve, of course.
So what was the response of your
teacher?
Um they actually quite amused.
Yeah, they they I mean, the amount of
Bible we got is nothing in comparison to
what you get in a religious school. In
an Orthodox
In an Orthodox school. Yeah.
I get it. Yeah. But still, I mean, you
grew up in Israel, history-laden
country. Too much history. Too much
history.
It's a country suffering from from far
too much history. And and And you were a
teenager during the first Intifada,
right? That's like 1987.
December '87.
Went on for 5 6 years, and and and your
father worked as a He worked as a in in
an arms In the in the weapons industry,
like I don't know, like I don't know,
like a quarter of Israelis are working
in the weapons industry or something.
but but how did these things influence
you back then?
I was very much interested in military
history. Again, this was my my my my
expertise in university at first was
medieval military history and the
crusades and things like that.
Yeah. Um so, uh Did you think it
influenced your choice of studies, for
example?
The the the focus on on military issues,
yes, but very much so.
Uh and it's kind of grounds you
You know, I I guess if I grew up in the
Netherlands, I would have a very
different view of the world. If you grew
up in the Middle East, uh you you you
tend to kind of
have um a darker view
of of humanity and of human history
because the the the violence and the
cruelty and also the stupidity is is all
around you. It's on your doorstep.
Yeah. You know, people killing each
other
over No, no, not over food, which makes
sense in some way,
but over fictional stories that that
other people invented.
Border.
You know, I I I I I teach in Jerusalem,
one of the most famous cities in the
world, and you go around Jerusalem, and
it's you know, it's just a regular
place. You have stones and you have
trees and you have dogs and cats and
cars. It's It's just an ordinary place.
But then in their minds,
people create a second layer of reality
and superimpose it on top of the stones
and trees and and and cars, and they
walk around and they see angels and
demons and paradise and hell and all
these things.
And they they live in in this second
reality. I mean, one of the clips that
we thought of showing and we didn't show
in the end is is The Matrix. Mhm. Uh but
this kind of futuristic idea that people
will live inside a virtual reality
sometime in the future when AI and
computers will become overdeveloped. But
people have been living in virtual
realities for thousands of years.
Everything around us is basically
virtual reality in a way. Yes, again,
there is the physical reality, of
course, of the stones and the trees and
the animals. But on top of that, we
impose
uh our fictions, our our virtual
realities, our inventions, whether it's
money or whether it's nations or whether
it's all these religious mythologies.
And most of the time what we see and
what kind of moves us
is the is the virtual reality. It's not
real. If the coral reefs
or or or the Amazon rainforest, which is
this amazing creation of of nature,
which took millions of years to create
and which really sustains our life, if
this gets destroyed,
people basically do nothing.
But if some, I don't know, the Western
Wall or Al-Aqsa Mosque or some other of
these, you know, buildings that we built
uh just, you know, a thousand or two
thousand years ago
and which are not really necessary for
our existence, if somebody would touch
one stone there,
you will all all hell will break loose.
And what does that prove?
That fictions are far more powerful
than reality
in
shaping
uh human history and politics and
economics. In the competition between
fiction and truth,
fiction, at least politically, usually
wins because the truth is just too
painful and too complicated.
And we don't only come up with fictional
stories about the world around us.
Um we also create them within ourselves.
Yes.
And to illustrate this, you wanted to
show uh another animated uh clip uh this
time from a Disney-Pixar movie, Inside
Out. Um A really wonderful, one of the
best movies I I've ever Yeah, it's such
Oh, very but like at the very top of of
my list. It's about um a girl named
Riley and we're starting at the
beginning of the story right after
Riley's birth. Is there Do we need any
more context, anything we need to know?
It's I would say it's kind of taking
everything Disney has done previously
and just tears it to bits and throws it
away and here is a completely different
way to understand humanity.
Let's have a look.
One of your favorites. Yes. Yeah, but in
in 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, you
you write about Inside Out. Most viewers
might well have missed both its
neurological meaning and its sinister
implications. What are the sinister
implications? It basically says, you
know, most Disney movies, they tell you
look inside of yourself and you'll find
authentic true core and who you really
are and things like that. Follow your
heart.
Follow your heart and and all these
advices and here,
you look inside and you realize that
Riley is basically just a big robot
controlled by not a single spark like a
soul or a spirit, but by a very
complicated neurobiological mechanism,
which doesn't have a single self or a
single core. You have all these
different and sometimes con- conflicting
uh forces which are personified here as
joy and sadness and disgust and a fear.
But basically and and you know that the
movie that it just starts. It things
gets complicated. There is a problem and
and they go to basically explore Riley's
brain. What's happening in there?
And they never discover a core self.
They just discover more and more
complicated biological mechanisms.
And the implications, you know, they're
they're are shattering. That uh first of
all that you have no idea what's
happening inside.
And secondly, that as you explore, you
realize that there isn't just a single
self.
There is a a whole bunch of conflicting
forces and mechanisms.
Which is very much in line with what
modern science tells us.
But something that most humans uh refuse
to accept and certainly most Disney
movies don't give you that impression.
So that that's what's amazed you that
all of a sudden Disney
turned around a corner and
Like something
gave us a different view.
Yes. And you know, I mean Disney's is
not so important. The the the importance
is that this is suddenly a new view that
is being given to kids.
About who they are and what makes them
function. Yeah, there is no little Riley
inside Riley and that's what you would
have expected.
Exactly. But but when you first see it,
like the very first seconds, you think
that okay, joy is Riley's soul.
Yeah. But then you realize no, joy isn't
Riley's soul. Joy is just one element.
One of the captains in the mothership.
Exactly.
And
And so Riley also Mhm. here's s-
Riley does not
um have one little Riley inside of her
telling what she wants or what she needs
or
It also says something about free will,
I guess. Um you you never get any sense
of free will.
No.
I mean the Riley is just being
controlled by the conflict between these
forces inside her.
keep changing.
And they keep changing. And a very
crucial message of the movie is that
none of them is the real Riley. Again,
the whole problem, I don't want to ruin
the movie for those who didn't see it,
but the whole problem is that Joy thinks
that she is the real Riley and Sadness
uh she she she's an intruder or
something.
Mhm. And the kind of uh uh uh
big epiphany of the movie is to realize
no, Joy isn't Riley. It's all these
forces together that shape and control
Riley. The idea of giving up a soul or a
self or
free will. I mean, that's you you
already mentioned for for many people
that's that's very hard. I mean, what's
left for us as humans if we have to give
up the idea of the self, of the free
will? To explore the the reality. I
mean,
you know, my main problem with with with
the idea of free will and the self, it
makes us extremely incurious about
ourself. If my decisions just reflect my
free will, whatever that is,
Mhm. then there is nothing to explore.
Why did I choose to agree to do this
show? Why did I choose this shirt? Why
did I choose this movie? Oh, it's my
free will, end of story.
But once you give up the the this
assumption,
you start really investigating what are
the
many causes or or processes The roads
towards
shape exactly that shape our desires.
Where are they called? Like the next
thought that comes up in in my mind.
Where did it come from? Why this
thought? Now, I think we arrived at the
chapter of meditation here as well,
right? Because that's the way how you do
it. Mhm. But if we stick to the
metaphor,
the inside out metaphor, and we So, we
we take a look inside your head in in a
Disney way. Mhm.
There's then Joy who loves watching
series
with her husband. And then there's Anger
who's angry at what? Animal cruelty. And
then there's Disgust, disgusted at the
historical historical inaccuracies in
Game of Thrones. Mhm. Um what do these
characters do when you meditate?
They do their thing. I mean, meditation
is not about trying to control them or
stop them. It's about just, you know,
observing what's happening.
But who's observing them then at that
That that's the classical question. Um
nobody's really observing them. It's
just a process of observation. There
isn't a self standing aside. There is
just a whatever is
is is a process, not an entity. Now,
there is no point in kind of trying to
get too much philosophical
whatever. It's it's all about the
experience. When when I went for the
first time to meditation retreat, the
instruction was extremely simple at
first. Just Just feel the breath coming
into your nostrils and going out of your
nostrils. That's it. Just do that.
Whenever your mind wanders away, just
bring it back.
And I couldn't do it for more than 10
sec- 10 seconds. And, you know, 10
seconds, the mind goes somewhere. It
takes me 5 minutes to realize I lost
touch with the breath and then bring it
back. And that's something you can
train. And this gets better over time,
but that's not the point. The point is
you realize something very, very
important about yourself that you have
no control or very little control over
the mind and that you don't really
understand what's happening there.
That's the really shocking thing. But
you credit meditation for handling fame
and adoration.
Uh how how does sitting still for 2
hours a day and and breathing contribute
to not becoming a self-righteous
douchebag with a guru complex?
Which you're not, obviously.
Um I hope not.
I hope not. I don't know. Because, you
know, and
it's
the the better you get to know your
mind,
it's much of it is about getting to know
your own weaknesses and getting to know
the stories that keep repeating in your
mind. You know, like a nation has a
national mythology and a religion has a
religious mythology, each person has
personal personal mythology. Who am I?
Where did I come from? What are my
strengths and weaknesses and whatever?
And usually it's just a mythology.
And So, people putting you on a pedestal
is one of those mythologies. Is that
what you're saying? It's it could become
very easy I mean, we like our myth to be
flattering. And what's more flattering
than, you know, all these people telling
you that you're so smart and that you're
like this and you're like that? It you
know, it immediately goes to the head.
And if if you don't have a kind if if
you don't really make the effort to
observe what's happening inside, very
easily you create a temple of yourself
in your mind and you put a statue of
yourself like this
beautiful god in in in in the mind and
you get so much attached to it and then
the moment somebody criticizes you in
some I don't know, TV show or in some
newspaper or in in in a blog, you you
get so upset. How can they criticize I'm
such an important person and I do so
many good How How do they dare criticize
me? And this is because you became
attached to this mythology
that that that you created in mind. Yes,
you created it with materials from
outside. We always do that. But does it
still affect you, criticism, or not at
all? Yes, it does. Yeah, a lot, right?
Obviously, I'm human. Yeah, I mean,
meditation is not a magic No, I mean,
that's that's the point about
meditation. People think that meditation
is about getting rid rid of stuff. The
stuff I don't like about myself, whether
it's my anger or whether it's my
irritation or selfishness or whatever,
I'll get rid of it.
And yes,
things change, but the really key the
the the really important thing is not to
get rid of stuff, is to get to know
yourself better. And especially to get
to know the stuff you don't like about
yourself, because it's easy to get you
know, we all know the stuff we like
about ourselves. Uh let's move on to the
obvious next question, namely
if humans are computers, cuz you just
called Riley a a computer, can computers
become humans? Mhm. And yeah, and what
does that even mean?
Uh the answer might be in the next
movie, Her. Um the story is set in the
near future where the main character is
lonely and he falls in love with his
operating system called Samantha. Kind
of like a sexy Siri or a sexy Alexa in
Her.
Yeah, she said
this is an AI and she it says that she's
embarrassed. Mhm.
Um is she really? And what would that
imply?
Uh there's so much to unpack in in this
scene. It's it's just amazing. Um
No,
maybe let's start somewhere else. I mean
Sure.
As a historian, I'm interested in the
past, but also in the future.
Even the distant future, because it's
it's part of our identity. What makes
who we are is not just the past, it's
also the future.
And I have this very strong sense that,
you know, we have
deep down, we are much
We are not just, you know, belong to a
nation or religion. All these things are
very shallow. Religions, nations, all of
them are just, you know, like 5,000
years old.
And much
more deep is our biological
uh
identity, which we saw with with Riley.
All these emotions
and and the body, they go back not 5,000
years. They go back tens of millions of
years. Like the the love between a
mother and a child, this is something
that's been around for hundreds of
millions of years. The breath, which we
talked about earlier, is hundreds of
millions of years. I still share that
with with reptiles.
I I I you breathe, I breathe. We we are
the same thing.
And then I looked at the future, and
maybe in a couple of decades, Earth will
be populated or even dominated by
entities that are not organic.
That they don't breathe. They don't have
emotions. Like the the potential of AI
is much much bigger than any historical
revolution. It's really a biological
revolution. Since the, you know, for 4
billion years, all of life was organic.
And this is at least an an idea of
inorganic life forms. That's the biggest
thing that happened on Earth in 4
billion years.
And it might happen in our lifetime.
Now, the biggest question when it comes
to AI, what AI is artificial
intelligence. Yes. And the big question
is, will it have consciousness,
emotions, feelings?
the difference between intelligence and
consciousness is Intelligence is the
ability to solve problems.
Whether it's playing chess or diagnosing
a disease or a math problem.
Consciousness is the ability
That's That's intelligence.
Consciousness is the ability to feel
things like love and hate and pain and
pleasure. Yeah. Now, in humans and other
animals, they go together. We solve
problems by having feelings.
Computers so far, they have more and
more intelligence, but zero
consciousness. When a computer beats you
and me in chess, the computer doesn't
feel happy. No. It only calculated all
the moves.
Yeah. So, it's a completely different
kind of intelligence. Now, nobody knows.
There is a
Maybe the biggest question about the the
the future
is whether
we will have super intelligent beings
without any consciousness dominating the
planet, or whether we will have Or maybe
artificial consciousness.
Yes. Like we saw in in in here. Cuz
that's why I asked the question about
about her, about Samantha being
embarrassed, cuz that's such a thing of
the conscience. Yes. Now, we don't know.
We There is It's possible. I mean, there
is no scientific reason why
consciousness must be limited to organic
biochemistry and carbon-based life forms
and can't exist in silicon-based life
forms. Cuz we're also little computers
ourselves. It's just in a bio way.
way, yeah. But so far, we don't see any
artificial consciousness. I mean, most
science fiction movies about AI are not
about AI. They're about AC, artificial
consciousness. The moment every movie
focuses on is the moment the computer or
the robot gains consciousness, and then
either the the the man falls in love
with the computer, or the computer falls
in love with the human, or they try to
kill each other, or something like that.
Yeah. That's always the big question.
and then kill all the Yes, but
so far, it's science fiction. There is
no indication that computers are
developing consciousness.
At present, a far more frightening
scenario is that we will have super
intelligence without consciousness, the
same way that airplanes fly faster than
birds without developing feathers. So,
computers will become more intelligent
than us, far more intelligent, without
having any feelings, any emotions,
and they will dominate.
Is there a difference between a
Darwinian evolution and the AI
evolution? Yes, first of all, Darwinian
evolution until today was organic. Yeah.
And this is not organic. But And also,
Darwinian evolution is evolution by
natural selection. Here, we have
intelligent design.
Yeah. So, not the intelligent design of
the creationists in the Bible, a really
intelligent design. We are designing the
AI, and then the AI will design maybe
the next generation of AI. So, it's a
completely different kind of process.
But
if
if AI is taking over,
um
No, let me let me rephrase this
question. I'm a human. I am a conscious
human being. We still don't know if AI
will have a conscience.
Yes. Um besides that, but like Riley,
I'm driven by joy, anger, fear, and
that's what motivates me. So, what
motivates then an AI if it's not
controlled by humans? It develops its
own, maybe non-conscious motivation.
It's It You know, AI is machine
learning. You don't program it. You
build the basic thing, and then it
learns.
Self-learning. It's It's learned, and it
develops, and you don't understand. You
know, it's it's it's it's very
practical. Today, when you apply to the
bank for a loan, and the bank basically
lets an algorithm decide your fate, and
he and and the algorithm says, "No,
don't give this lady a loan." And you
ask the bank, "Why not? What's wrong
with me?
Is it my face? Is it my race?"
Yeah, is it my my the gender, the race,
whatever? The bank says, "We don't know.
The algorithm said no, and we don't
understand Even the people who designed
the algorithm don't understand the
decision that it is making. And what's
even more kind of frightening is, as we
saw in in this clip it
it it's on the verge of having the
ability to hack human beings.
I mean if Riley is this kind of
spiritual self with free will, computers
can't hack us, can't understand us. But
we if we are basically a very complex
biological process
then with enough data
and enough computing power, we are very
close to the point when computers can
hack human beings, can understand my
emotions, my likes, my dislikes better
than me. Not perfect. You can never
hack something 100% You don't need 100%.
You just need to know people better than
they know themselves. And this is quite
easy because most people don't know
themselves very well. So just imagine
what happens when we pass
as the algorithm knows what I want
better than I than I know it.
You're a puppet. It can manipulate you.
It can press your emotional buttons. And
this is what is happening now with our
smartphones and all these, you know,
algorithms on social media and things
like that.
have a smartphone?
Uh that's one of No, that's one of the
reasons. That basically it's it's to
keep my my time. And you know, over the
last 20 years the most the smartest
people in the world and the best
technology in the world has been working
on the problem of how to hack human
beings and control them through the
screens and smooth through the
smartphones. I'm no match to them.
If I give them access, they they win.
Yeah. So I try to limit their access.
In that way. In that way.
Yeah.
Her is also about the basic human need
of being understood. Mhm. Finding
someone else who totally gets you.
Um yeah, to feel loved. And I think
that's also the common thread in the
Australian Netflix series Please Like
Me.
Created, written, performed by uh Josh
Thomas. I absolutely love this series.
I I I I watched it like four or five
times.
Cried my eyes out at the end. Um why did
it appeal to you?
Um
well, first of all, I think it's one of
he's one of the funniest people on the
planet today. The main character, the
main character
Thomas he has a very unique sense of
humor. It gets
It takes time to grow on you. I mean, I
the first time I watched the first
episode and closed the TV and said, "I'm
not watching that." And after a couple
of weeks or months, I tried again and
gave it a chance and it's it's kind of
it it takes time.
And
um it's it's just such I never saw
something like this on television.
It was just, you know, so real in a way.
And what makes it so real for you?
Um
the the way that the people behave and
and
again and this kind of deep
existential sense of humor. It's not
like funny haha funny. It's I think very
kind of
uh mixture going again back to Riley
when joy and sadness mix together and
you get a kind of this is really how how
life is. It's not like in the comedies.
It's a gray area. Yeah, and it's not
black and white. It's not haha or la-
laughing. It's everything combined.
Yeah, and we really see that in this in
this scene. We meet Josh at the zoo with
his mom Rose and her friend Hannah
and so there's Josh and then there's a
cute Arnold in Please Like Me.
So romantic. Mhm.
Why did you choose this particular
scene?
Uh
I like it very much that it's in a zoo.
It's kind of it's part of nature.
Um Wait, a zoo is not nature. No, I mean
I mean that what's happening between
them
is it's natural. It's part of nature
like the meerkats and like this dolphin
or whatever
them getting kissing, you mean? Yeah,
they're getting together, the romance
and we talked about you know our deep
biological identity and you have you
have all these rituals and you have
national rituals and religious rituals
and these rituals are very shallow. They
go back, you know, like 2,000 years,
5,000 years like I think about my Bar
Mitzvah. So, Bar Mitzvah people had for
like 3,000 years top.
Now, romance and your first kiss and
like having this click with somebody,
this is a biological drama, a biological
ritual
which goes back tens of millions of
years
and it's such a deep thing and it's like
your entire body is like some new button
is is being pressed and
um
it's and and and it it connects
everything we talked about in about the
previous clips.
Like you know, I came out as as gay when
I almost was 21.
Now, Samantha, the AI from Her, she
could tell me that I was gay when I was
I don't know, 13 or 14. It should have
you know been written on my forehead but
people don't know themselves well. So, I
didn't know.
I I I I still it's still one of the kind
of foundational insights I have about
human beings, remembering myself at at
15
that it should have been absolutely
obvious. Cuz you think coming out at age
21 is is quite late and I because I read
that you regretted coming out. It's not
so much about whether it's late or it's
I'm trying to say how
how did I miss it? I think I'm a I mean
intelligent person and you know, it was
So, it was not that you stayed in the
closet for other people but you stayed
in the closet for yourself. You were
hiding from yourself.
Yes, and this ability of the mind not to
know something so deep, so important,
and again should have been so obvious.
This It's It's It's really mind-boggling
that we can do these things. And it also
connects to these stories that they the
fictional stories. I mean, why does it
happen? So, one of the most basic
explanations is because, you know,
again, growing up in Israel in the 1980s
People would ask you when are you going
to get a girlfriend? Uh
Of course. You almost never hear about
gay people. If you hear anything, it's
always terrible things.
Like it's against nature or it's against
God. Oh, and that's why you found the
zoo and the nature thing important.
Exactly. And then it take a very long
time to realize, "No, it's not true.
It's just a story that some people
invented 2,000 years ago."
Yeah, cuz basically what everything
humans do is nature.
Exactly. I mean, you can't break the
whole thing about homosexuality being
unnatural. It's a misunderstanding of
what nature means. You can never do
something unnatural. But it's just also
the stupid argument that people who hate
homosexuals in the first place use. It's
not a real They don't really think that
it's unnatural.
No. I mean, you have all these rabbis in
in in Israel that would go around and
say, "No, this is It's not just the
Bible. It's nature."
And um
I believed it to to some extent for many
years. And to understand that what
nature actually is, you cannot break the
laws of nature. The laws of nature are
not like the laws of a country that the
government has a rule that you can't
drive more than 90 km/h. And I drive
anyway. You drive 120, a police officer
stops you and gives you a ticket. This
is not how nature works. That there is a
rule against moving faster than the
speed of light, you do it anyway, it's
unnatural, so a galactic police officer
comes along and gives you a ticket. No.
And it doesn't work like that with sex
and romance.
If homosexuality was against nature, it
just couldn't exist. You know, things
against nature are for example driving
faster than the speed of light. You
don't need human rules against them,
they just can't happen.
It's impossible.
Yeah. So
to go back cuz I loved the way you
explained the feeling of getting your
first kiss as like a button being
pressed and then you feel it all all
over. When when
do you do you want to tell me about your
first kiss?
it wasn't such a good No, it wasn't a
bad experience, but it wasn't such a
good experience, either.
it a bad kiss or what was it? Um
it was kind of an anticlimax. You hear
about it so much and again, it's part of
the kind of the damage of being in the
closet for so long that you kind of you
you don't allow things to take their
more natural course.
And then, you know, all these characters
in the head that we saw in in in in
Riley, they get completely messed up.
And they are kind of tied in knots
within knots. It takes you years to
untangle these knots. So, what should
have been you know, a kind of playful
and wonderful and natural
uh
ritual
or biological drama Mhm. gets this
complicated social, cultural, religious
toxic mix.
There was too much pressure. You you
yourself put too much pressure on it.
Yeah, too much conflicting expectations
and too much pressure and
misunderstandings and
you know, that there was
after I came out, so there was a time
that I felt that finally I've solved it.
Like there was this one piece of the
puzzle in I don't understand life and
here I have this missing piece of the
puzzle
Yeah, cuz when did you realize how did
you realize you were gay? At 21? Was it
It was a process of a few a few months
and and and a movie also played a I
remember actually this one movie, maybe
I should have shown this.
It was 1997 and there was this film
festival in Jerusalem and there was this
movie called
a Canadian movie, French Lilies.
And it was kind of some had some had
very explicit gay scenes and I remember
walking out of the cinema and saying,
"I'm gay."
That's that's the kind of I mean it it
wasn't again
this is mythology. We embellish things
when when we tell them to make them
simpler. It was a process of of of
several months.
But it's also a beautiful example of
what art can do to you, right?
Yeah, but it was a moment of of
crystallization.
But then it kind of you know, it was a
false enlightenment. Like I had a
feeling for some time that that's it. I
I had this whole life this feeling that
I don't understand life and the social
system what's going on and because I
missed this critical piece and now I
have it.
of life.
Yes.
you cracked the puzzle of your of
yourself.
Yes and you know, everybody everybody
already did it because they're straight
and and they had it easy and now I I
finally cracked it. That's it. And it
took like one or two years to realize
now it it it was an important thing. It
was a very good it but it's it it it's
it didn't solve everything.
still pieces missing.
There were still a lot of pieces
missing. Life is still messy. It's Yeah.
And you mentioned the algorithm that
that an algorithm could have have told
you sooner that it that you were gay.
Yeah, by You know, just watching what
happens to my eyes when I walk on the
beach in Haifa and there is a sexy guy
and a sexy girl walking hand in hand in
swim swimsuits. Where do my eyes go? I I
should have been very simple for an AI
to figure it out. But is that for you
frightening future? Is it a positive
thing? Cuz I mean It depends what we do
with it. But it also depends where you
live, right?
If you live in Iran Yeah, then you're
Yes, that's a very problematic
thing that you know that they know about
you even before you do.
And that's the thing about hacking
humans. Throughout history
dictatorial governments always wanted to
hack human beings to be able to know
what you think, what you feel. You know,
Stalin gives a speech, everybody smiles
and claps their hands, but Stalin wants
to know what you really think.
they didn't have the technology back
have the technology. Now the technology
is there.
And it's not just it's it's all the
time. You know, again, in the Soviet
Union
the KGB couldn't follow you 24 hours a
day. They didn't have enough agents. And
even if they they had an agent on you,
the agent would write paper reports that
somebody, a human being, needs to read.
It's impossible to analyze all that. Now
with AI and smartphones and sensors and
cameras and microphones and all that,
you can literally follow everybody 24
hours a day. You don't need human
agents. We carry the agent in our pocket
or whatever. And you don't need human
analysts to go over the data. You have
AI. So it's for the first time in
history it's possible to follow
everybody all the time and follow even
what's happening under the skin and to
hack humans.
Now it's And to find out their
preferences, their secret loves, their
Everything what you like to get to know
you better than you know yourself. But
ironically, science did help you find
love, right? Cuz I read that you you met
your husband through a dating site.
That's also an algorithm.
I I mean, I'm not against technology. I
think that every technology can be used
for good or for bad. A knife can be used
to kill a person or to save a person's
life if you're a surgeon on an operating
table or to chop salad. Same goes for
for a
bat that you play baseball with, yeah.
Exactly. So, again, I met my husband
online. I mean
who who who decided that he actually was
the one? Was that you or was that the
algorithm? Or was the algorithm in your
head?
was me. I think that dating apps, they
have a misunderstanding. Most dating
apps, a misunderstanding of of of
humans.
Too many dating apps
understood humans as consumers of mates.
Like, you have the perfect mate out
there and the dating app just needs to
give you
You're a consumer and this is a product
you consume. So, they bring you the
product and you try, "Ah, this one is is
is is too dull and this one is like this
and give me another product."
And this is an entire misconception.
Because humans are not consumers of
mates. They are producers of
relationships. The difficult part starts
after you meet the person. It's not
about meeting Mr. Right. It's about
doing the hard work of actually creating
a relationship, which is something an
app cannot do for you. The hard work you
have to do yourself is what you're
saying. Yeah. It's also funny how you're
avoiding the term soulmate in this case
cuz there's no such thing in your world,
right? Yeah, so, you know, I mean, we
need an app
to help us create better relationships.
Because, you know, we need to change
ourselves. There is no Mr. Right. There
is no perfect person, but somebody who
is good enough. And then to start the
real difficult work of building the
relationship.
There is no Mr. Right. Yeah. Yeah.
And again, it's it's it's it's something
very basic about
how technology treats us, whether it
kind of constricts us or whether it
gives us opportunities. I I watched
another interview with you where you
told that you I know you don't have
children and I heard you say in an
interview that you're You and your
husband are not planning to to have any
no, no. Me, since ever since I was a
young girl, I always felt a calling deep
from within that I really, really,
really wanted to become a dog owner.
I never wanted kids, either. I don't
It's I It's never crossed my mind. If I
didn't know that people have kids, I
would never have thought about it myself
that somebody would would do such a
thing. Yeah. And on the other hand, now
and then, not very often, I'm like,
maybe am I missing out on the only
possible meaning I feel that I don't
understand life in the world well enough
to take responsibility
for bringing somebody into this mess and
for being kind of, you know, the
salesperson of life. Maybe, I mean, if
it was easier to adopt, it's almost
impossible for gay a gay couple to adopt
kids in in Israel.
Ah, okay. If it was possible to adopt,
then this is an option. But, just the
possibility
that I'm totally responsible for
bringing somebody into this mess, which
I don't understand. If I understood it,
then okay.
And then also being perhaps totally
responsible for their death,
uh this is too much for me.
It's This is also a good example of the
puzzle, the piece is missing in the
puzzle and you not knowing
yeah, what mess you're bringing them
into. Yeah. Speaking of the mess we are
bringing children into, we started off
this evening What was it? 700,000 years
ago with a clip from Once Upon a Time
Man, and um you you wanted to show
another
Yes. clip from the same series, the
children cartoon series. We're fast
forwarding to the past century
and how it all ends.
It's always nice to end an interview on
a positive note.
Thank you for that.
Um Do you have anything to add or are
you going to leave us with it? No, I
think that this is a warning.
It's not a prophecy.
History is not deterministic. We don't
know how the world will look like in
2050. It depends on our actions. We
still have agency. We have power. We
have more power than really than ever
before. We sometimes just like the
wisdom to use it in in the right way.
Yeah, the power of our imagination.
There's hope. But we need to you know,
we need to get our act together. But
it's totally within our power to create
a really good world. Thank you so much
for this interview. Thank you. I really
enjoyed it. Thank you. I really enjoyed
it. Thank you. I really enjoyed it.
Thank you. I really enjoyed it. Thank
you. I really enjoyed it. Thank you. I
really enjoyed it. Thank you. I really
enjoyed it. Thank you. I really enjoyed
it. Thank you. I really enjoyed it.
Thank you. I really enjoyed it. Thank
you. I really enjoyed it. Thank you. I
really enjoyed it. Thank you. I really
enjoyed it. Thank you.
Yeah, the power of our imagination.
There's hope.
But we need to you know, we need to get
our act together. We need to get our act
together. But it's totally within our
power to create a really good world.
Thank you so much for this interview.
Thank you. I really enjoyed it. Thank
you. I really enjoyed it. Thank you. I
really enjoyed it. Thank you. I really
enjoyed it. Thank you. I really enjoyed
it. Thank you. I really enjoyed it.
Thank you. I really enjoyed it. Thank
you. I really enjoyed it. Thank you. I
really enjoyed it. Thank you. I really
enjoyed it. Thank you. I really enjoyed
it. Thank you. I really enjoyed it.
Thank you. I really enjoyed it. Thank
you. I really enjoyed it. Thank you. I
really enjoyed it. Thank you. I really
enjoyed it. Thank you. I really enjoyed
it. Thank you. I really enjoyed it.
Thank you. I really enjoyed it. Thank
you. I really enjoyed it. Thank you.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.