Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[MUSIC PLAYING]
I love the detail.
I loved listening to the great scores that I grew up on
and hearing the detail.
And to me, the detail is what brings it to life,
makes it exciting.
There's an quality of--
the intricacy of the structure, as you're building it,
and the details of that intricacy
is what makes orchestral music so beautiful to me.
Unfortunately, in the real world,
those details are usually steamrolled over in the dub,
and one of the first things I had to learn
was, often, when I'm doing a certain level of detailing
in a piece of music that gets me very excited,
I realize the audience will never hear this
in the film because of the moment,
because there's stuff happening on the screen.
And there's a propensity most of the time,
that if there's stuff happening on the screen--
and I'm not talking about Gatling guns and machine robots
in an army coming towards you.
I'm talking about just stuff, which
shouldn't, on the surface, conflict
with hearing the detail.
But most of the time, it does because the people that
are putting together the sound for the film,
they like their own details, and their own details
means all the detail of the stuff
that you see and might hear in the background.
And there's a conceptual problem here
because I still believe in the purity of music and image,
and there are moments where the music can do something
that sound effects can never do.
And there's moments that the sound effects can do something
that the music can never do, and they
should both have their place.
But in contemporary film scoring and film dubbing,
frequently, we're both asked to do everything all the time.
"Lawrence of Arabia" has an incredible score
by Maurice Jarre.
One of the beautiful moments that I noticed when I first
saw it was that, we're getting ready for a giant battle,
and in the preparation for this battle,
you hear nothing but horse hooves,
rattling metal sound effects.
And you feel like you're in the middle of this charge,
and it's perfect.
They're not using music.
[RUMBLING OF THE HORSES' HOOVES]
They want you to feel in the middle
of the chaos of this moment that the sound effects are
doing perfectly.
It doesn't need anything else.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
Then the moment-- there it is.
That's the city.
We're going to take it.
The score comes in, and it's huge.
And the director, David Lean, let the score take over.
Now, you don't notice, when you're listening,
that the sound effects almost completely disappear
and the score takes over because it's seamless.
And it feels perfect because the score can deliver
an emotional element for what's happening
right there, as the great conflict is coming to fruition,
that the sound effects can't possibly do.
And he gave both of them their moment.
Unfortunately, if "Lawrence of Arabia"
were redone and scored today, rather than, I'm
going to guess, a 50 minute score, less than 60 minutes
probably, would be a two and a half hour score,
or [INAUDIBLE].
If the movie's two and a half hours long,
it would be a two hour, 20 minute score.
There'd be about 10 minutes with no music,
and everything would be fighting for every moment.
And unfortunately, you wouldn't come away
with the sense of hurting-- hearing a great score having
just played and the beauty that comes from feeling that.
So I love it when, occasionally, today, a director
allows both things to happen, and the detailing
in that piece of music can actually be felt and heard,
and it's a wonderful experience.
But this is just me talking as a purist, as a film purist.
I love the separation of sound effects and music
put to their best ability, both together.
There's very few scores I've worked on that I probably
wouldn't suggest that they be 25% to 40% less
music in the score today, but it's simply
not how it's done these days.
It's like, give these moments to the sound effects.
Let them bring you into their own detail
of the incremental things that are happening around them--
the sound of crickets, the sound of this, all the things
that they could do.
When the music starts, let me do that, but let
me do it in an emotional way that'll
bring us into that moment.
And then the detail does actually
happen in just the right way.
But detailing is something that I think of as wishful thinking,
but that doesn't stop me from wanting to do the job right,
because I know it's the right way to do it.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.