Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,430
[FOREBODING MUSIC]
2
00:00:26,580 --> 00:00:29,690
Filmmaking, as a
collaborative art, how seriously
3
00:00:29,690 --> 00:00:30,830
should it be taken?
4
00:00:30,830 --> 00:00:34,760
Well, that question applies
to every part of filmmaking.
5
00:00:34,760 --> 00:00:36,680
Should films be taken seriously?
6
00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:39,020
Should any part of cinema
be taken seriously?
7
00:00:39,020 --> 00:00:41,000
Is it all just
light entertainment
8
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,200
that doesn't take
itself seriously?
9
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:49,040
And since the 1900s
began and films began,
10
00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:51,920
that's a question that's
been going on and on and on.
11
00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:55,730
Film music is just as
important-- no more, no
12
00:00:55,730 --> 00:00:57,500
less-- than filmmaking.
13
00:00:57,500 --> 00:00:59,090
So if you believe
that filmmaking
14
00:00:59,090 --> 00:01:01,640
has value and filmmaking
can be important,
15
00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:04,460
then the music can
and is as well.
16
00:01:04,459 --> 00:01:08,319
So your job as a composer
is exactly that important.
17
00:01:08,320 --> 00:01:11,450
It's however important that
you take the subject of cinema.
18
00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:19,780
When I started
watching the movies,
19
00:01:19,780 --> 00:01:21,700
I'm guessing I
was around 5 or 6.
20
00:01:21,700 --> 00:01:24,820
Because I remember the first
movie that scared the crap out
21
00:01:24,820 --> 00:01:28,570
of me and kind of started a
bit of a lifelong obsession
22
00:01:28,570 --> 00:01:30,550
was a movie starring
Peter Lorre called
23
00:01:30,550 --> 00:01:32,210
"The Beast with Five Fingers."
24
00:01:32,210 --> 00:01:34,580
Now "The Beast
with Five Fingers"
25
00:01:34,580 --> 00:01:38,900
was a horror movie from
actually the '40s or '50s.
26
00:01:38,900 --> 00:01:43,040
But this Peter Lorre character
became a lifelong obsession
27
00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:44,000
with me.
28
00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:48,290
And oddly, the hand that was
pursuing him-- because that's
29
00:01:48,290 --> 00:01:49,140
what it was about.
30
00:01:49,140 --> 00:01:51,380
It was the hand of
a pianist that he
31
00:01:51,380 --> 00:01:53,870
was instrumental in
killing, this pianist.
32
00:01:53,870 --> 00:01:56,480
Then he was haunted by the
hand that continued to play
33
00:01:56,480 --> 00:01:59,300
the piano and--
whenever he was alone--
34
00:01:59,300 --> 00:02:00,260
would come after him.
35
00:02:00,260 --> 00:02:02,700
And it would be
climbing up his shirt.
36
00:02:02,697 --> 00:02:04,027
And he would be pulling it down.
37
00:02:04,030 --> 00:02:06,380
It was always
going for his neck.
38
00:02:06,380 --> 00:02:09,980
And anybody who knows
their classic films--
39
00:02:09,979 --> 00:02:14,869
Peter Lorre, who I
identified with greatly,
40
00:02:14,870 --> 00:02:17,540
was better than
any actor has ever
41
00:02:17,540 --> 00:02:23,120
been in terms of showing angst
and the pain of a situation
42
00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:28,010
and the horror of a moment
when the hand was going up.
43
00:02:28,010 --> 00:02:31,010
And I loved it.
44
00:02:31,010 --> 00:02:31,970
That had me.
45
00:02:31,968 --> 00:02:34,008
And I couldn't have been
more than six years old.
46
00:02:34,010 --> 00:02:36,440
Because it started
lifelong dreams
47
00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:39,230
of being pursued by
an amputated hand.
48
00:02:39,230 --> 00:02:40,910
And if you look
around my studio,
49
00:02:40,910 --> 00:02:43,580
you'll see I'm
obsessed with hands.
50
00:02:43,580 --> 00:02:46,370
I collect hands--
hands that are human,
51
00:02:46,370 --> 00:02:50,300
hands that are not human,
anatomical hands, wax hands,
52
00:02:50,300 --> 00:02:52,710
real hands, mummy hands.
53
00:02:52,710 --> 00:02:54,950
And so the things that
frighten me are now the things
54
00:02:54,950 --> 00:02:56,450
that I stayed obsessed with.
55
00:02:56,450 --> 00:02:59,900
But I also noticed there was a
great piece of music in there.
56
00:02:59,900 --> 00:03:01,550
Now I learned
later that this was
57
00:03:01,550 --> 00:03:03,510
Max Steiner doing the score.
58
00:03:03,510 --> 00:03:06,530
The Steiner score
was magnificent.
59
00:03:06,530 --> 00:03:08,270
And I didn't know who this was.
60
00:03:08,270 --> 00:03:12,410
But I began noticing music but
not really paying attention.
61
00:03:12,410 --> 00:03:14,870
I didn't know the
name Max Steiner.
62
00:03:14,870 --> 00:03:19,280
When I was about 11, I saw "The
Day the Earth Stood Still."
63
00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:21,380
And "The Day the Earth
Stood Still," of course,
64
00:03:21,380 --> 00:03:23,690
was scored by Bernard Herrmann.
65
00:03:23,690 --> 00:03:28,500
And this time, I
noticed the music.
66
00:03:28,500 --> 00:03:30,800
The music-- something moved me.
67
00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:32,600
It grabbed hold of me.
68
00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:36,080
And I actually went and
checked who wrote the music.
69
00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:39,380
And I got to a point where, by
the time I was an early teen,
70
00:03:39,380 --> 00:03:43,820
I'd go, oh, I'll bet
that's Miklos Rozsa.
71
00:03:43,820 --> 00:03:44,960
I'll bet that's Korngold.
72
00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:46,640
That's got to be Korngold.
73
00:03:46,640 --> 00:03:48,350
And I was getting
proud of myself
74
00:03:48,350 --> 00:03:51,560
for being able to hear the
styles of different composers.
75
00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:53,990
And it all started with my
infatuation with Herrmann.
76
00:04:00,520 --> 00:04:05,960
Now the irony of my infatuation
with Bernard Herrmann
77
00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:08,810
is many people will agree
that his best work was
78
00:04:08,810 --> 00:04:10,280
done for Alfred Hitchcock.
79
00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:13,610
But at this young age,
I had not seen any of it
80
00:04:13,610 --> 00:04:14,450
and couldn't see it.
81
00:04:14,450 --> 00:04:18,230
Because the first movie that
came along at the theater
82
00:04:18,230 --> 00:04:21,380
that Herrmann would have scored
that Alfred Hitchcock directed
83
00:04:21,380 --> 00:04:22,850
was "Psycho."
84
00:04:22,850 --> 00:04:27,860
And for all my life, it's
the first movie my mom said,
85
00:04:27,860 --> 00:04:30,050
no darling.
86
00:04:30,050 --> 00:04:32,450
I don't think
that's a good idea.
87
00:04:32,450 --> 00:04:35,180
And my parents never had
any idea what I was seeing.
88
00:04:35,180 --> 00:04:36,800
I mean, I was seeing--
89
00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:39,140
the week before-- "The
Head That Wouldn't Die,"
90
00:04:39,140 --> 00:04:42,470
where the scientist reaches
into the mutant's room
91
00:04:42,470 --> 00:04:44,540
and gets his arm yanked off.
92
00:04:44,540 --> 00:04:48,410
And then you see the
bloody trail of his stump
93
00:04:48,410 --> 00:04:50,510
go down the stairs
before he dies.
94
00:04:50,510 --> 00:04:53,300
And then another creature
reaches into his neck
95
00:04:53,300 --> 00:04:56,330
and pulls out some jiggly thing
and throws it on the floor.
96
00:04:56,330 --> 00:04:57,450
And there's a close up.
97
00:04:57,450 --> 00:04:58,870
These are the
movies I grew up on.
98
00:04:58,867 --> 00:05:01,757
So for my mom to suddenly be
aware of what I was seeing
99
00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:03,560
was like, what do you mean, Mom?
100
00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:05,870
You never even ask me
what I'm going to see.
101
00:05:05,870 --> 00:05:08,390
And I realized that
there was a difference.
102
00:05:08,390 --> 00:05:10,630
Because there was a lot
of press for "Psycho."
103
00:05:10,625 --> 00:05:13,335
And the press all said sexual.
104
00:05:13,330 --> 00:05:14,480
"Psycho" is sexual.
105
00:05:14,480 --> 00:05:17,210
And suddenly, a
lot of us kids had
106
00:05:17,210 --> 00:05:20,100
the brakes put on for the
first time in our lives.
107
00:05:20,100 --> 00:05:23,510
And so it took a while for
me to be able to get into.
108
00:05:23,510 --> 00:05:26,450
Finally, I guess
when I was 16 or 17
109
00:05:26,450 --> 00:05:30,200
and started to look more
back into film history--
110
00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:31,740
oh my god.
111
00:05:31,742 --> 00:05:33,202
It's like I already
loved Herrmann.
112
00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:36,350
But "Psycho"-- this
is the best score
113
00:05:36,350 --> 00:05:37,880
I've ever heard in my life.
114
00:05:37,879 --> 00:05:41,229
[ROUSING MUSIC]
115
00:05:46,990 --> 00:05:49,790
And then "North by Northwest"
and then "Vertigo"--
116
00:05:49,790 --> 00:05:53,720
and it's like this is the
most amazing use of music
117
00:05:53,720 --> 00:05:56,260
in a film I've ever
seen in my life.
118
00:05:56,262 --> 00:05:58,222
And then, of course,
going all the way back to,
119
00:05:58,220 --> 00:06:01,040
you know, his earliest
work with "Citizen Kane."
120
00:06:01,040 --> 00:06:04,190
So the one that was
already a demi-god for me
121
00:06:04,190 --> 00:06:06,500
became a god at that point.
122
00:06:12,220 --> 00:06:15,330
I grew up paying attention
to the music of Korngold
123
00:06:15,330 --> 00:06:19,090
and a lot of the
classic composers
124
00:06:19,090 --> 00:06:22,120
who were excellent
narrative storytellers.
125
00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:28,660
They came out of the late 19th,
early 20th century tradition.
126
00:06:28,657 --> 00:06:30,117
And that's literally
who they were.
127
00:06:30,115 --> 00:06:33,615
They were German
composers that were
128
00:06:33,610 --> 00:06:37,420
drafted to try to figure out
in 1930, what is a film score?
129
00:06:37,420 --> 00:06:39,110
And what can you do with it?
130
00:06:39,110 --> 00:06:40,720
And they were lucky
enough to get guys
131
00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,870
like Korngold and Franz
Waxman and Steiner.
132
00:06:43,870 --> 00:06:46,300
They were all
classical composers
133
00:06:46,300 --> 00:06:50,800
out of this era of very
narrative storytelling music.
134
00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:54,760
Because that was the music that
was leading into that period--
135
00:06:54,760 --> 00:06:58,480
the music of Tchaikovsky and
so many other composers that
136
00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:00,370
was the beginning of narrative.
137
00:07:00,370 --> 00:07:04,660
You listen to music, and
you can hear stories.
138
00:07:04,660 --> 00:07:07,090
That was the tradition
that they established.
139
00:07:07,090 --> 00:07:10,270
The first two scores,
the big ones--
140
00:07:10,270 --> 00:07:13,000
"King Kong," "Bride
of Frankenstein."
141
00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:17,050
It's amazing to go and watch and
listen to those scores again.
142
00:07:17,050 --> 00:07:20,540
Max Steiner with "King Kong"
not only figured out what to do.
143
00:07:20,535 --> 00:07:22,665
And you have to understand
if you're watching this,
144
00:07:22,660 --> 00:07:24,400
nobody had done this before.
145
00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:27,280
He was figuring it out
in his head from scratch.
146
00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:30,790
There was no tradition to
follow to say, how do you
147
00:07:30,790 --> 00:07:33,010
synchronize music to film--
148
00:07:33,010 --> 00:07:34,810
this relatively new medium--
149
00:07:34,810 --> 00:07:36,790
and make it work
for a narrative?
150
00:07:36,790 --> 00:07:39,580
And he was inventing
on what he knew.
151
00:07:39,580 --> 00:07:41,710
And when "King
Kong" starts moving
152
00:07:41,710 --> 00:07:45,430
and his music moves
with King Kong,
153
00:07:45,430 --> 00:07:47,050
that seems like nothing now.
154
00:07:47,050 --> 00:07:47,760
Of course.
155
00:07:47,755 --> 00:07:48,885
You hear that all the time.
156
00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:54,200
But back then, it
was extraordinary.
157
00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:57,230
It was establishing
an idea which
158
00:07:57,230 --> 00:07:59,360
would last for the
rest of the century
159
00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:01,160
and is still around today.
160
00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:04,760
And what Franz Waxman did with
the "Bride of Frankenstein"
161
00:08:04,760 --> 00:08:09,350
was to go this great, effusive,
mysterious melody and score
162
00:08:09,350 --> 00:08:13,340
that built and built and
did such a beautiful job
163
00:08:13,340 --> 00:08:19,730
of bringing in this tragic,
dramatic, melodramatic-- sure,
164
00:08:19,730 --> 00:08:20,990
why not--
165
00:08:20,990 --> 00:08:25,010
but mysterious element
of bride of Frankenstein
166
00:08:25,010 --> 00:08:26,270
and what she was.
167
00:08:26,270 --> 00:08:29,080
And it's an incredible score.
168
00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:32,030
The bride of Frankenstein!
169
00:08:32,034 --> 00:08:36,874
[SOARING ORCHESTRAL MUSIC]
170
00:08:43,179 --> 00:08:47,469
And thank god John Williams--
in the '70s, who was a student
171
00:08:47,470 --> 00:08:49,150
of this music--
172
00:08:49,150 --> 00:08:52,540
brought to life again in the
'70s into the '80s and helped
173
00:08:52,540 --> 00:08:56,950
bring back the whole idea of a
big narrative orchestral score.
174
00:08:56,950 --> 00:08:59,680
Because that's really what
he did with Star Wars,
175
00:08:59,680 --> 00:09:05,020
was to re-establish, as a genre,
a big, orchestral, melodic
176
00:09:05,020 --> 00:09:05,770
sound.
177
00:09:05,770 --> 00:09:09,400
It dates right back to
the original composers
178
00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:11,200
in a beautiful but original way.
179
00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:14,170
I'm not saying that he was
copying them because he wasn't.
180
00:09:14,170 --> 00:09:15,100
He had his own style.
181
00:09:15,100 --> 00:09:19,390
But he was illustrating
exactly how
182
00:09:19,390 --> 00:09:22,600
the masters would take
a thematic narrative
183
00:09:22,600 --> 00:09:25,210
and weave it into a score.
184
00:09:25,210 --> 00:09:29,830
And on the other extreme,
you have contemporary music,
185
00:09:29,830 --> 00:09:31,810
which can be extremely
effective, where
186
00:09:31,810 --> 00:09:34,830
there's no melody at all,
but there could be a motif.
187
00:09:34,830 --> 00:09:37,120
And the motif says a lot.
188
00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:39,940
The most minimalist
beautiful way
189
00:09:39,940 --> 00:09:43,180
in recent history I can think of
would be Mica Levi in the film
190
00:09:43,180 --> 00:09:43,960
"Under the Skin."
191
00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:45,360
I love that score.
192
00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:47,140
And I love her compositions.
193
00:09:47,140 --> 00:09:52,930
But so simple and so basic and
so primitive and so effective.
194
00:09:52,930 --> 00:09:54,420
[FOOTSTEPS]
195
00:09:54,415 --> 00:09:57,885
[TENSE MUSIC]
196
00:10:02,830 --> 00:10:06,340
Sometimes, the whole point
is to make a statement
197
00:10:06,340 --> 00:10:11,050
and not be obvious that
we're saying this or this.
198
00:10:11,050 --> 00:10:13,000
We're saying, just
giving you a feeling.
199
00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:14,680
How does that make you feel?
200
00:10:14,678 --> 00:10:15,968
And that's what you want to do.
201
00:10:15,970 --> 00:10:18,850
You want to go, I'm not sure
how I feel about this character.
202
00:10:18,850 --> 00:10:21,430
I'm not sure if this
character is good or bad.
203
00:10:21,430 --> 00:10:23,040
Maybe they're both.
204
00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:24,570
And you can do
that with the music
205
00:10:24,570 --> 00:10:26,780
purposely, this
kind of ambiguity
206
00:10:26,780 --> 00:10:29,410
that maybe it's telling
a story, maybe it's not.
207
00:10:29,410 --> 00:10:32,770
And again, I think that's
one of the beautiful things
208
00:10:32,770 --> 00:10:37,060
about composition is that
gray area when you're
209
00:10:37,060 --> 00:10:40,330
telling a story that really can
be interpreted different ways
210
00:10:40,330 --> 00:10:41,950
and intentionally so.
211
00:10:41,950 --> 00:10:46,440
Because you don't want to give
up your hand at that point.
15920
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.