Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:06,319 --> 00:00:08,880
I wouldn't be writing the way I write
2
00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:11,920
now if I hadn't read Lewis Carol. And I
3
00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:13,679
wouldn't be writing the way I write now
4
00:00:13,679 --> 00:00:17,199
if I hadn't read James Joyce.
5
00:00:17,199 --> 00:00:19,600
I read Czechov when I was probably 18 or
6
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:21,760
19. And Czechov made a strong impression
7
00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:24,720
on me. I also read Emily Bronte
8
00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:27,119
Weathering Heights when I was about 15
9
00:00:27,119 --> 00:00:29,599
and that made a strong impression. All
10
00:00:29,599 --> 00:00:32,000
writers have mentors
11
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:34,239
who begin when they're children and
12
00:00:34,239 --> 00:00:36,800
they're aware of writing. They're aware
13
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:39,280
of books that they love.
14
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,480
Like is it the the Phantom Toll booth?
15
00:00:42,480 --> 00:00:44,879
Some children love that. So they say the
16
00:00:44,879 --> 00:00:47,360
Phantom Toll booth along with Alice and
17
00:00:47,360 --> 00:00:51,360
Wonderland where the wild things are and
18
00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,879
for older children JK Rowling's u the
19
00:00:54,879 --> 00:00:58,079
Harry Potter novels they they all exist
20
00:00:58,079 --> 00:01:01,840
in sort of like a a stratosphere
21
00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:05,920
that allows the young person to read
22
00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:08,240
work that is established and very well
23
00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:10,400
done. So when the writer starts to
24
00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:13,040
write, he or she's drawing upon some of
25
00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:17,320
these these mentors.
26
00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:25,119
I would say almost dogmatically that you
27
00:01:25,119 --> 00:01:27,360
can't be a writer unless you're reading
28
00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:30,960
all the time and reading with purpose.
29
00:01:30,960 --> 00:01:33,439
Not just reading to waste time or
30
00:01:33,439 --> 00:01:36,640
reading something on the internet, but
31
00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:39,759
reading crafted work. If you just sit
32
00:01:39,759 --> 00:01:41,600
down and read a little novel by Gene
33
00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:44,000
Ree, which is like wide sarcastle sea,
34
00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:47,439
it's like maybe 120 pages,
35
00:01:47,439 --> 00:01:51,680
that nolla, that short novel is so good
36
00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:53,600
that when you start writing the next
37
00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,240
day, you're going to be writing better.
38
00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:58,560
You're not going to be imitating her,
39
00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:00,159
but you'll be writing better than you
40
00:02:00,159 --> 00:02:02,799
would be if you hadn't read her. And so
41
00:02:02,799 --> 00:02:05,680
reading is the springboard to writing.
42
00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:07,520
What you read and how with what
43
00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:09,759
intensity you read is going to determine
44
00:02:09,759 --> 00:02:13,040
probably what you write because you all
45
00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:16,160
all human beings are imitative primates.
46
00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,319
We belong to the big primate family like
47
00:02:18,319 --> 00:02:22,000
apes and and chimpanzees and and monkeys
48
00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:24,080
of all kinds. You know, monkey see,
49
00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:26,560
monkey do. We are very imitative
50
00:02:26,560 --> 00:02:29,440
species. So when you're a little older,
51
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:32,000
you may want to read classic writing.
52
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:34,480
You may want to read Faulner, Hemingway,
53
00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:37,120
James Joyce, Kafka, Thomas Man, Virginia
54
00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:39,599
Wolf. You Henry James. You may want to
55
00:02:39,599 --> 00:02:42,560
aim very high because the more you read
56
00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:45,200
and the more you're absorbing when you
57
00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,120
start to write, you're going to write on
58
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:49,280
a higher level than you would be if you
59
00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:52,319
if you didn't read these people. And so
60
00:02:52,319 --> 00:02:54,480
it's like the old saying, if you want to
61
00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:56,319
learn how to play tennis, you play
62
00:02:56,319 --> 00:02:58,080
tennis with somebody who's better than
63
00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:00,319
you. You don't play tennis with somebody
64
00:03:00,319 --> 00:03:01,920
who's not as good as you because you're
65
00:03:01,920 --> 00:03:04,400
never ever going to learn anything. So
66
00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:07,519
reading Ulisses by James Joyce, take a
67
00:03:07,519 --> 00:03:10,400
whole summer, just spend time reading
68
00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:13,360
it, and you'll first of all, it's a
69
00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:15,920
great work of art and it's enthralling.
70
00:03:15,920 --> 00:03:18,080
It's difficult, but it is truly
71
00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:21,200
fascinating. And you'll find that as the
72
00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:24,159
weeks go by, your vocabulary will start
73
00:03:24,159 --> 00:03:27,680
to improve. Your sense of language will
74
00:03:27,680 --> 00:03:30,560
elevate. And when you write, you may
75
00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:33,360
sound nothing like James Joyce. Nothing.
76
00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:35,200
But yet, you sound much better than you
77
00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:36,799
would have if you hadn't read James
78
00:03:36,799 --> 00:03:39,799
Joyce.
79
00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:45,760
There are two kinds of readings that are
80
00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:48,159
really helpful to young writers. One of
81
00:03:48,159 --> 00:03:51,519
them is spontaneous and improvised where
82
00:03:51,519 --> 00:03:53,840
you simply find a book maybe in a
83
00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:56,560
library or in a bookstore and you can
84
00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:58,560
even be drawn by the cover and just
85
00:03:58,560 --> 00:04:00,879
start reading it and be plunged into a
86
00:04:00,879 --> 00:04:03,360
world you didn't anticipate. You might
87
00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:05,920
really love that book. It might change
88
00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:07,599
your life or it might not be too
89
00:04:07,599 --> 00:04:09,920
important. Then the other kind of
90
00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:13,280
reading is systematic. You decide very
91
00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:15,920
you decide very clearly that you're
92
00:04:15,920 --> 00:04:18,639
going to read all of the young Hemingway
93
00:04:18,639 --> 00:04:21,120
short stories because it's mostly his
94
00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:23,040
short stories I think that are helpful
95
00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:26,479
to writers rather than the novels.
96
00:04:26,479 --> 00:04:28,880
Hemingway's novels are are good novels
97
00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:30,560
but it's the short stories that he was
98
00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:34,080
really a master at. So you just say to
99
00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:36,639
yourself, I'm going to read 25 short
100
00:04:36,639 --> 00:04:39,280
stories by Ernest Hemingway and I'm
101
00:04:39,280 --> 00:04:41,680
going to read them more than once and
102
00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:44,400
and learn from them. So that that kind
103
00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:47,120
of reading is what you may get in a
104
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,759
university course or community college
105
00:04:49,759 --> 00:04:52,080
or your own, you know, maybe it could be
106
00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,560
a course online or whatever. It's
107
00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:56,400
systematic. But the other kind of
108
00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:58,240
reading is just spontaneous. And I've
109
00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:01,120
had so many extraordinary experiences
110
00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:04,880
with just um improvised reading. In
111
00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:06,479
fact, one day I was just looking at a
112
00:05:06,479 --> 00:05:08,479
book maybe in a library. I'm not even
113
00:05:08,479 --> 00:05:12,720
sure that it was a book I that I picked
114
00:05:12,720 --> 00:05:14,639
up. I It was basically on a library
115
00:05:14,639 --> 00:05:16,800
table. I think I was looking at a
116
00:05:16,800 --> 00:05:18,720
history of America, maybe popular
117
00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:20,880
culture. And I turned a page and there
118
00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:24,479
was a picture of a girl about 16 and she
119
00:05:24,479 --> 00:05:27,759
had brown hair and a very pretty face
120
00:05:27,759 --> 00:05:29,919
though not glamorous. And I wondered
121
00:05:29,919 --> 00:05:31,440
like who's that? She looks like my
122
00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:33,440
mother or she looked like girls I went
123
00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:35,280
to school with. So I thought it was
124
00:05:35,280 --> 00:05:37,840
Norma Jean Baker the woman who would
125
00:05:37,840 --> 00:05:40,240
become Marilyn Monroe.
126
00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:43,120
And I was just astonished at this
127
00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:45,840
snapshot of this girl because she looked
128
00:05:45,840 --> 00:05:47,440
nothing like Marilyn Monroe. She didn't
129
00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:50,320
have that blonde hair and she wasn't
130
00:05:50,320 --> 00:05:52,800
radiantly beautiful. She was just
131
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,039
pretty. And so I thought, well, maybe
132
00:05:55,039 --> 00:05:57,919
I'll read about her. So it was just
133
00:05:57,919 --> 00:06:01,120
totally an accident. So eventually I
134
00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:04,560
wrote a 1400page novel really based on
135
00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:06,479
just the accident of seeing that
136
00:06:06,479 --> 00:06:09,440
snapshot, which is amazing because I I
137
00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:10,880
might not have gone into the library
138
00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:12,400
that day. I might have done something
139
00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:14,880
else. I might have decided I didn't want
140
00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:16,639
to look at that book. So it was really
141
00:06:16,639 --> 00:06:19,120
an accident. So I think along with the
142
00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:22,240
systematic and purposeful reading you
143
00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:26,039
have to have a lot of accidents.
144
00:06:29,919 --> 00:06:31,520
Obviously the reading is the first
145
00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:33,600
experience and if impressionistically it
146
00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:35,919
made a really strong impression on you,
147
00:06:35,919 --> 00:06:37,840
you want to reread it. So then you
148
00:06:37,840 --> 00:06:39,680
notice the second time through how it's
149
00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:43,039
based, how it's structured. A writer is
150
00:06:43,039 --> 00:06:45,039
seeing how it's put together. So I
151
00:06:45,039 --> 00:06:47,360
always notice like what's the title?
152
00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:49,280
What's the first paragraph, the first
153
00:06:49,280 --> 00:06:52,080
sentences, is the first chapter very
154
00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:54,960
short, is it long, is it divided into
155
00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:57,600
sections? To to me, all those formal
156
00:06:57,600 --> 00:06:59,280
qualities of the work are very
157
00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:01,759
interesting. But I wouldn't expect when
158
00:07:01,759 --> 00:07:03,360
my mother was reading my work, I
159
00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:05,599
wouldn't expect my mother or my father
160
00:07:05,599 --> 00:07:08,400
to have any interest at all or to be
161
00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:10,800
aware of any of that. Like my mother
162
00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:12,800
wouldn't say to me, "Oh, Joyce, I love
163
00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:15,759
this structure of your novel." And when
164
00:07:15,759 --> 00:07:18,319
I was on the Oprah show some years ago
165
00:07:18,319 --> 00:07:21,039
for my novel, we were the Mulanies.
166
00:07:21,039 --> 00:07:22,560
There were a number of women on the
167
00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:26,240
Oprah show with me. And all of them
168
00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:29,360
talked about my novel to me, but not one
169
00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:30,800
of them talked about the formal
170
00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:32,720
qualities. They only talked about the
171
00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:35,680
characters. In other words, most readers
172
00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:38,000
are reading for character and then
173
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:40,080
they're reading for a plot, but the
174
00:07:40,080 --> 00:07:42,319
writer has to present that in the most
175
00:07:42,319 --> 00:07:44,240
coherent way possible, in the most
176
00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:46,720
effective way. So, it's like you're
177
00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:48,720
making a film. People look at a movie,
178
00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:50,800
they sit back in the seat, and they see
179
00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:53,120
this movie and they really enjoy it and
180
00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:55,599
they love it. They have not one
181
00:07:55,599 --> 00:07:57,599
millionth idea of all the work that goes
182
00:07:57,599 --> 00:07:59,759
into it. They don't know how the movie
183
00:07:59,759 --> 00:08:01,680
had pre-production, how there was
184
00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:04,160
research, how years went by. They don't
185
00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:05,919
know how many people worked on it, who
186
00:08:05,919 --> 00:08:08,400
the script writers were. They don't even
187
00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:10,160
know who the directors. I mean, most
188
00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:12,319
people have no interest in the formal
189
00:08:12,319 --> 00:08:15,120
qualities. But if you're in that world,
190
00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:17,039
the formal qualities are really the only
191
00:08:17,039 --> 00:08:20,400
ones that matter. Like, how did how did
192
00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:23,039
James Joyce put Ulyses together to me is
193
00:08:23,039 --> 00:08:25,520
very interesting. Whereas to a reader,
194
00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:28,160
maybe not so much. So, if you're going
195
00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:30,240
to be a writer, it's like if you're
196
00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:32,080
going to be a cabinet builder, you have
197
00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:34,080
to look at a cabinet and you have to go
198
00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:36,640
to the cabinet maker and say, "How did
199
00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:38,240
you make this wonderful cabinet?"
200
00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:40,880
Because I can't see it with my eyes. I
201
00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:45,080
have to somehow learn about it.
202
00:08:48,959 --> 00:08:52,000
The formal qualities of a work are most
203
00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:55,279
obvious when one spends time maybe
204
00:08:55,279 --> 00:08:57,839
discussing them with other people. I
205
00:08:57,839 --> 00:09:00,800
think learning by yourself is not so
206
00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:04,000
effective. Most of my learning
207
00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:07,920
about Hemingway Faulner and James Joyce
208
00:09:07,920 --> 00:09:10,480
I did alone. I didn't really have a
209
00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:12,080
structure.
210
00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:14,080
But I think if you could take a college
211
00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:16,880
course, take a course in writing, a
212
00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:19,519
writing workshop where with other people
213
00:09:19,519 --> 00:09:21,279
sitting around a table, you're actually
214
00:09:21,279 --> 00:09:25,279
thinking and talking about Hemingway,
215
00:09:25,279 --> 00:09:27,680
it could be Jodie Picot, who is a
216
00:09:27,680 --> 00:09:29,839
wonderful contemporary writer, a popular
217
00:09:29,839 --> 00:09:32,160
best-selling writer. We have people like
218
00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:35,200
in a book club. So you have people
219
00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:37,680
sharing something that they read and
220
00:09:37,680 --> 00:09:39,600
somebody says, "Well, I really like this
221
00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:41,839
passage." somebody else said, you know,
222
00:09:41,839 --> 00:09:43,600
I don't like this character and then
223
00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:46,000
discuss it or what don't you like about
224
00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:48,240
that character or I really like the
225
00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:50,240
ending of the novel or somebody else
226
00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,399
says I didn't like the ending and to
227
00:09:52,399 --> 00:09:54,560
sort of discuss it in that formal way
228
00:09:54,560 --> 00:09:56,959
rather than saying I liked it or didn't
229
00:09:56,959 --> 00:10:00,160
like it is too simple but like why what
230
00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:02,320
did you like about it? Those are things
231
00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:04,480
that you learn by you know reading it
232
00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:07,040
more than once. But I I think the best
233
00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:09,760
way to to enjoy literature is with other
234
00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:12,160
people.17746
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.