Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
It's very exciting to experiment with
structure. I think that many stories are
best told in some elliptical way or some
unusual way.
There's only one rule of of show
business or writing and that's don't be
boring. So, anything that you can do
that's interesting and novel and keeps
keeps an audience engaged. Almost
anything you you can do that's not
boring will be successful. Like you
could have a story that was just all the
beginning. Now, I've never tried that.
Just a story that kept having a
beginning but never went anywhere. But
yet, it could have its own ending that
would be very experimental and it
couldn't be too long. You could have a
story that was just the middle. You
could have a story that was just final
paragraphs.
I've asked my students sometimes to do a
story that was just description of the
scene
where you're setting the scene very
carefully for a story
using really good descriptions and
really original metaphors, but then
that's the story. The whole story is
setting the scene. So that would be
experimental. I've seen a story by
somebody whose younger brother died of a
drug overdose and they didn't know he
was even a drug addict. It was a shock
because no one knew he was a he's taking
heroin. So, he's reported he's dead. So,
people in the family are so stunned by
this. They just keep remembering when
they last saw him. And did they have any
hint? You know, people are always
saying, "Oh, we had no hint." When
people commit suicide, everybody said,
"I I had no idea." Or, "Well, I might
have had an idea." Or, "That's my fault.
I didn't help." Or, "I didn't know what
I could have done."
All these thoughts lend themselves to a
kind of like question and answer. You
could have a whole story that was a
questionnaire.
I probably have done that, you know, a
question, a question and answer. Okay,
that'd be that'd be a nice story for a
writer who wants to experiment a story
in a question and answer mode. Another
story could be just answers. I once
wrote a story that was answers like the
question you don't see. You just see the
answers and that that was fun to do.
So, I recommend for any story that you
have that you like that you're haunted
by to find some unusual way of telling
it. Some experimental writers like like
Donna Bar and Robert Coover and John
Barth have done all sorts of wild
things.
I once wrote a short story that was just
notes to contribute on contributors. You
know at the end of a magazine I have
notes on contributors. So my story was
called notes on contributors and it was
in the magazine. So when people who read
the magazine thought that thought that
was the notes of the contributors but it
really wasn't. It was a short story, but
anybody could do that. I mean, that's
something that somebody else could try.
Notes on contributors.
I think it would be really great for a
new writer or young writer to say to
herself or himself, I'm going to write a
series of pros works
so a novel that there's no name for what
they are. And somebody will say, well,
is it pros? Is it poetry? Is it work of
art? and have each each story will be in
the form of some interesting shape that
no one's ever done before because to do
something that no one's ever done before
is really quite an accomplishment.
So that's a challenge.
Some time ago in in my own life, I was
very interested in experimental music
and there are piano pieces by Henry Cow
who lived in early 20th century and I
I'm not sure that I was trying to play
these piano pieces but I was listening
to them in recordings and Henry Cow had
this really wonderful
weird eerie technique opening the piano
and playing the strings of the piano And
when you play the piano in that way with
the strings, this is very ghostly and
strange sounding. It sounds like the
piano, but it's different.
And there's no resonance. Like when
you're playing piano, usually you're
using a pedal. So there's a little
memory, the resonance of the music and
and the vibrations continue. But with
Henry Kyle, everything was kind of
broken. And so it was discontinuous in a
very exciting way. So ma I had the idea
to write a story that would mimic that
that structure. So the story would have
these floating paragraphs like the
chords of a piece of music and each
little paragraph would be very small and
just have a fact
each fact and then some paragraphs got
longer. The title of the story is heat.
So it was midsummer, the heat rippling
above the catam roads, cicas screaming
out of the trees and the sky like pewtor
glaring. So I worked on that first
paragraph for a while with the commas
and the sky like pewtor comma glaring.
That seemed important to me. So, I had
that first paragraph
and then the second paragraph, the days
were the same day, like the shallow mud
brown river moving always in the same
direction but so low you couldn't see it
except for Sunday. Every day is the same
day. Then church in the morning, then
the Sunday newspaper, the color comics
and newsprint on your fingers. So, when
I got to the second paragraph,
the word you came up. So now it seems
that somebody's remembering something.
The days were the same day. There'll be
church in the morning on Sunday, the
newspaper, the comics. So that suggests
that these are children
in this world and the newsprint on your
fingers, which is something I remember.
So then the third paragraph,
I introduced Ria and Role.
So now there are two girls. Now, we
don't know how old they are, but they're
flying on their rusted old bicycles down
the long hill toward the railroad yard,
Whipples Ice, the scrubby pasture land
where dairy cows grazed. They'd stolen
$6 from their own grandmother who loved
them. They were 11 years old. They were
identical twins. They bask in their
power. So, the third paragraph, it's not
necessarily related to the others. It's
like this Henry Cow music that is kind
of floating.
And then the fourth paragraph is out of
time. It's just sort of an observation
from the future. Rita and Roa Conungle.
It was always Ria and Roa. Never ROA and
Ria. I I don't know why. You just
couldn't say the names that way. Not
even the teachers at school would say
them that way. So, this seems to be some
girl classmate of theirs remembering
them, but she doesn't know too much
about what she's saying.
Then the fifth paragraph,
we went to see them in a funeral parlor
where they were waked. We were made to.
So, by the fifth paragraph, we see
they're already dead. Ria and Roa, we
saw them on their bicycles, but by the
fifth paragraph, they're dead already.
We were made to go see them in the
funeral parlor. We were made to meaning
we were children and we had to do it.
Our parents made us. The twins and twin
caskets, white, smooth, gleaming,
perfect as plastic with white satin
lining puckered like the inside of a
fancy candy box and the waxy white liies
and the smell of talcum powder and
perfume. The room was crowded. There was
only one way in and one way out.
So that paragraph is packed with a lot
of meaning. We see that the girls are
dead and they're in this very plastic
looking situation with white
like a candy box
and waxy liies and a smell of talcum
powder and the room is crowded. There's
only one way in and one way out. This
suggests like there's one way into our
lives.
and there's one way out and the children
are made to go in the funeral parlor.
Then the next paragraph, Rean wrote it
with the same girl. They'd wanted it
that way. Only looking from one to the
other could you see they were two. This
is a child speaking in kind of illogical
almost like a comic voice. They were the
same girl, meaning they looked
identical. They were twins. They wanted
to look identical. You have to look from
one to the other quickly to see that
they were two. Try to figure out which
is Ria and which is Roda.
But the person who's saying this is a is
childish. And so her method of speaking
is a little bit naive. Then the next
paragraph
is out of time. It's some different
time. The heat was gauzy. You had to
push your way through it like swimming.
On their bicycles, Ria and Roa flew
through it, hardly noticing from their
grandmother's place on Main Street to
the end of South Main where the paved
road turned to gravel leaving town. This
was the summer before seventh grade when
they died.
Death was coming for them, but they
didn't know.
So the whole story proceeds in these
paragraphs that are cutting back and
forth in time
and we get introduced to other people
and you're introduced to their murderer.
The murder is introduced very soon.
It's said that he's arrested before we
know who even who he is because the girl
who's remembering the story remembers it
in a discontinuous way which is the way
our memories were.
The whole story was imagined as this uh
experiment in in paragraphs. And so I
just started writing it and I wrote the
paragraphs in no particular order the
way a child might remember them. If you
were remembering somebody you knew in
grade school, so you somebody you knew
in seventh grade and this person died,
you have a discontinuous memory like you
remember uh well you remember the first
time you met the the girl, you might
remember the girl with your mother, you
might remember the girl who was already
dead, you remember how she died, you
remember thoughts about her, you
remember something that she did. None of
it's none of it's continuous because our
memories are very broken and fragmented.
Nobody has a chronological memory.
All our memories are just sort of like
ripples in the pond and they're very
discontinuous, but they're very u it's
very exciting that way because there's a
certain delayed continuity. The
chronology is definite.
Something happened 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. The
the chronology is very clear, but the
memory of it is discontinuous.
So for me it was very exciting to write
it because once in a while the girl she
thinks death is coming for you but you
don't know when and suddenly she thinks
that's true for her too. You know it's
when you're a child you don't think that
death is coming for you. When you get
older you do I think that we become
ghosts in our own pasts and there are
certain places that we haunt in our
memories. We keep going back to those
places and looking at them again. And
the idea of the girls on the bicycle is
something that is very haunting to me.
If you're a writer, you want to find
something that's haunting to you,
something you may remember, but not
completely.
You remember parts of it.
There's a very famous short story by
Charlotte Perkins Gilman called The
Yellow Wallpaper that people probably
know. I recommend that story, but that's
all just sentences and almost no
paragraphs. And that story is written
from the point of view of a woman who's
suffering a nervous breakdown. She's
been put in a room at the top of a house
that almost feels like she's been put
away like she in a her own family's put
her in an asylum like her husband's put
her up in that room. And that story when
you look at it is very manic. She's
manic. The sentences are like machine
gunfire. She's in a manic state all the
way through. She's breathless.
And when you look at that story as a
typological phenomenon, you really want
to read it. Now, there are other stories
and other pros where it's all one
paragraph. And there have been novels
that are all one paragraph. They
represent a certain challenge to the
brain because we we like continuity
and discontinuity. We like continuity to
end. We like finite things. We like
minutes to minutes lead to hours and
hours end. Hours are hours lead to a day
and that ends. You cross off that and
then it leads up to a month and you
cross off the month and then we have a
year. Now in nature there are seasons
but there are not these finite things.
You know birds and animals have no sense
of what what the chronology is. But
there's something about the human brain
that likes things to be finite. So you
like something to come to an end. And
when it's all one paragraph, like a long
novel,
that's a challenge. It's a challenge.
Your readership diminishes. You don't
have as many people read it. A typical
Stephen King novel moves very swiftly.
And all the novels, probably every novel
that's a bestseller
ever is something that moves pretty
fast. And some of the sentences are are
pretty short in the declarative
sentences. I wanted to write a story
that was about a maze and as you go
around the maze you get farther and
farther till you're in the middle and it
might have been something I called the
maze or the captive. So the story
has sentences all around like in in a
large type all around. So you you read
it like this and then the next line in
is slightly smaller font. So you're
going in and that's slightly smaller. So
you keep going around and around
slightly smaller font until it gets way
way way in. Then in the middle there's
like a a rectangle
that ends with like two words
and a period. So the idea is that some
person has gone through this whole maze
and ends up in the middle and it's it
was reprinted printed in a magazine. So
you had to keep turning the magazine
around and so I was pasting things in
and then I photocopied it. So it became
more like a work of art. But I would
like to experiment with something like
that again. And I should I should
encourage my students to do that kind of
uh
typological experimentation.
There are there's a whole kind of poetry
you know that like a poem in the shape
of a tree, a poem in the shape of a key,
a poem of the the shape of a bird. Um, I
have had I've tried to write poems in
different shapes like the shape of a
tree with a little thing on the bottom.
Those are very interesting because they
acknowledge the the fact that's neur
neurological that art comes to us
through our eyes.
So art and and literature come to us
through our eyes and you can do things
with the white space. That's very
arresting. If I were an editor, I used
to be an editor. If I got a st short
story that had different
uh typography and different shapes and
fonts, I would read that story with more
more interest than a conventional story.
I would find that very exciting visually
and I would hope that I could publish
it. There may be other editors who feel
that way.
But most stories that come in are just
conventional. So I would like to do more
unusual things like like that. So as I
think more about it, maybe I'll go home
and write some of these strange stories.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.