All language subtitles for pf-3x08

Previously on Picket Fences.

The man may have killed a 16 -year -old
girl.

No polygraph.

And I don't want you even talking to
him.

We've been looking everywhere for this
girl.

I didn't do anything.

In the name of God, she deserves a
Catholic funeral.

Tell me someplace to go.

Give me a hand.

That statement was coerced without
counsel. The statement was voluntary.

Deputy Lacus prevailed on my client's
Christian sympathies.

Mr. Latham, you are going to trial.

If the Supreme Court has a problem with
that, they can come and get me.

We find the defendant guilty as charged.

This case is going to the Supreme Court.
You and I are going to argue before the

Supreme Court.

Carter, come on in.

Okay, very funny.

Whose blood sample was this?

Just give me the results.

Carter? I don't have to tell you whose
blood it was. I just asked you to do a

simple test, so please, give me the
results.

You led me to believe this was your
blood.

Let's just assume that it is, Jill.

Give me the results.

Please?

Okay.

Congratulations, you're pregnant.

I know you're good, Mr. Wambaugh. It
isn't that.

Brian, there is no way.

No lawyer, F. Lee, Bailey, anybody.

There's no way that anybody could be
more prepared than me.

But you don't believe I'm innocent.

It really doesn't matter. It does to me.

See, Mr. Wambaugh, you got it wrong.

I don't want my lawyer to act like his
life depends on it.

I want the guy to act like my life
depends on it.

because it does.

I want a lawyer who knows that I didn't
do it.

When those judges look at my lawyer, I
want them to see it in his eyes that I

didn't do it.

Are you that lawyer, Mr. Wambaugh?

I haven't been, but I will be.

Go to Washington.

But don't you dare go for you.

Go for me.

Positive.

That means we're about seven weeks.

I still can't believe it.

I mean, I guess I just can't believe it.

Okay, now, Stacy, your privacy concerns
aside, you have to start making regular

doctor appointments.

And it's not too soon for an ultrasound.

And I'm going to be wanting to do an
amnio when the time comes, too, so...

not get ahead of ourselves, Carter.

I like to be thorough.

Oh, God.

I'm going to be a father.

Yeah.

Wow.

I want to schedule an immediate checkup.

Oh.

I didn't mean to intrude. I just came to
see you, Carter.

You remember Stacy Halford?

Stacy, this is Jill Brock.

Hi.

Well, congratulations, I guess.

Thank you.

Are you two together?

No, we're not.

But you plan to be parents together.

I plan to be the parent. Stacy has
agreed to be my surrogate.

What?

We did it in vitro. It was all
scientific. Lots of people do it today.

Oh, I know that, yes. I guess I'm just
surprised.

There are worse ways I can spend my
time, I guess, than give somebody a

What's wrong with that?

Nothing, nothing. And it's certainly
none of my business.

Why don't we leave it at that, then?

Okay. Okay.

Me? I get to go?

Of course, you're my assistant.

I'm going to the Supreme Court?

All those cases we copied, I want them
alphabetized. I need to refer to them

quickly. Brian Latham's life is in our
hands.

And don't forget to pack my oxygen tank.
And if you see me start to wheeze, just

whip it out.

I've never been so nervous before.

You're going to be great.

I've never been so nervous before.

Did I say this?

I repeat myself when I get nervous.

Did I say this?

It's just another case.

No, it's not just another case.

Why would the Supreme Court agree to
hear this so quickly? Something is up.

What do you mean?

There are two things on the rise in this
country. Crime and police misconduct.

Now, the court may have chosen this case
as a test to squash one or the other. I

just wish I knew which.

When do you leave?

Tomorrow morning.

We argued Thursday.

Shouldn't I go with you? It might help
if the father of the victim was in the

room. No, no, they would view that as
manipulation.

It's not wise to stunt with the Supreme
Court.

The highest court in the land.

They may free the man who murdered my
daughter because they don't like the way

you caught him.

Yes, sir.

No offense, Mr. Littleton, I know you
have talent, but shouldn't the Attorney

General be handling it at this level?

Are they sending me?

Please don't lose.

Carter?

Stacy, hi. Come on in.

Sit, sit.

I can't.

You can't fit?

I can't.

But it all seemed to make sense
intellectually.

Oh, Carter, we've become such good
friends now.

When you came to me and asked me, I
don't think I've ever been more

And to give life, what would be so
wrong?

What are you saying?

It feels wrong.

I'm not comfortable being a surrogate.

Here's the check.

I'm returning the money.

Stacy, Stacy, what are you doing?

I'm not going to have the baby, Carter.

I know you're disappointed, but I just
can't go through with it.

We had an agreement.

I know.

except my deepest apologies.

My brother -in -law's a travel agent. He
always bumps me up.

You'll have to thank him for it.

Why shouldn't we be up here?

Hey, miss.

We're off to the Supreme Court.

Excuse me. Could you speak just a little
softer? I'd like to sleep. Of course.

Miss, I'll have his French toast.

You got profiles?

The Supreme Court just says you got
profiles?

It's these little things that make the
difference. The extra effort.

Oh, let me look at them.

They're mine.

You scared, John?

Please.

Yeah, completely.

Rehnquist, Scalia, Stevens, we're going
to be standing up there in front of

them. I shouldn't tell you this, but
Rehnquist... You have to call him Mr.

Chief Justice. I know.

When Nixon swore him in, he called him
Regberg.

Can you imagine?

The man makes it all the way to the
Supreme Court, and on his big day, Nixon

calls him Regberg.

Terrible with names, Nixon.

Try to sleep.

I have an appointment with Dershowitz at
3 o 'clock.

Alan Dershowitz.

He's in Washington. He agreed to tutor
me on what to expect.

I'm leaving nothing to chance, John. I'm
going to win this case.

No, you're not. Oh, yes, I am. I must.

Doug, if prepared as you think you are,
you're not.

I plan to bury you.

We'll see.

Yes, we will.

I

don't

perform abortions.

I know. I was hoping you could recommend
a doctor who does.

A good one.

So...

Well, wouldn't your OBGYN be able to
make that recommendation?

The truth is, I haven't told her I'm
pregnant.

I'd sort of prefer not to. I'm a little
humiliated.

All right.

I saw your car parked out front.

Stacy, I'm begging you. Oh, Carter,
please. Why don't you two go in here?

You

can't

abort this child.

I can't go through with it, Carter.

I'm sorry for doing this to you. I
should have known before. No, you can't.

I know surrogacy is right for a lot of
people. It's just wrong for me.

I have to do this.

I'll stop you.

You can't stop me.

Well, Well, here we are, Wambo and
Dershowitz talking law, discussing

strategies, constitutional scholars
waxing. Mr. Wambo, please, my time

limited. I do have a couple of other
cases, so if we can get right to the

Well, I'm ready on the law, but I need
to know from somebody who's been there,

somebody who's been in that room.

I know it's just another courtroom,
except with more judges, right?

Nothing to be... Mr. Wambaugh, this
courtroom is unlike anything you have

seen in your life.

For starters, you'll be staring down
nine Supreme Court justices spanning the

entire width of the room.

That can be a very daunting experience.

One justice will ask you a question from
here. Then you'll be attacked from

there, and it will be an attack.

This is an aggressive court. This is a
confrontational court. This is an

argumentative court.

This is not going to be a friendly
experience.

Franklin Dell, appearing for Carter
Pike, Your Honor.

Where's Wombo?

He's off to Washington.

Your Honor, this is an ex parte motion
seeking a restraining order to enjoin

Stacey Halford from terminating her
pregnancy.

What did you just say?

My client entered into a surrogacy
contract with this woman. She became

impregnated through in vitro
fertilization and now... She's

terminate the seven -week pregnancy, and
we are asking the court to intervene.

Mm -hmm.

Well, there's an obscure case called Roe
v.

Wade. Has nothing to do with it, Your
Honor. She may have a right to an

abortion, but she waived it when she
entered into the surrogacy contract.

there's no health risk here.

We're entitled to an enforcement of the
contract.

Well, if a woman wants to have an
abortion... Her body, her right. Yes, we

know the slogan, but this woman leased
out her body for $12 ,000. She no longer

has that privilege.

And I would submit, what about his
rights?

He went through in vitro.

He took drugs to boost his sperm count.

His child is in that womb.

What about his rights?

I can't force a woman to carry a baby to
term. Of course you can, Your Honor.

The law already does that. A woman in
third trimester, she seeks an abortion,

the court says no. The law mandates that
she carry the baby to term.

That's a third trimester fetus, which is
viable.

This pregnancy is only seven weeks.

Yes, Your Honor, but the point is that
the courts can and do force women to

children in some circumstances.

It's done.

Well, this is another circumstance where
they and you could do it.

We're not asking you to take away her
Roe v. Wade right.

We maintain she already gave it away.
We're simply asking you to enforce the

contract.

I want to hear from the woman and her
attorney before I do anything.

Well, what if she decides to... I'll
give you a one -day temporary

order. We'll have a full hearing
tomorrow.

Adjourned.

What the hell could be next?

Will I get slaughtered?

The law's on your side, at least for
now. But Scalia, Rehnquist, Thomas,

probably even O 'Connor, are looking for
any excuse to get rid of Miranda.

This is a perfect case for them. A
drifter killed an innocent teenager.

It would be a very popular decision.

Scalia, you have to be really careful.

He is brilliant, but he can get very
testy.

He's gifted at trapping lawyers, and he
loves to watch a lawyer squirm a little

bit. Well, what about those on my side?

Won't they come to my defense?

Ginsburg, Stevens are probably going to
be your best allies, but tomorrow

they're not going to help you one bit.
You're all alone.

There's only one person who can fight
off Scalia, and that's you.

You okay?

When I'm nervous, I get winded.

Recently, I was diagnosed with multiple
sclerosis. Maybe I could play it for

sympathy. That would not be a good idea.

Just a thought.

Renquist has a bad back.

Sometimes he just gets up in the middle
of argument and walks behind the curtain

just a stretch. Don't let that throw you
off.

Remember, you must always call him Mr.

Chief Justice, not judge, not your
honor, not justice.

You must call him Mr.

Chief Justice.

Nixon called him wrenchbag.

Nixon made mistakes.

Now, Thomas.

Thomas, you don't have to worry about
tomorrow. He never asks a single

If you want to win over Thomas, just win
over Scalia.

Thomas always follows Scalia.

Ginsburg. She asks sculpted, word
-perfect questions.

But listen carefully.

She's a nitpicker.

One more thing.

Don't lecture them on the law.

After all, they wrote the law.

Where your advantage lies is in the
facts.

You were at the trial. They weren't at
the trial.

Play up the facts. If you can persuade
the justices that you know more about

facts than they do, it's going to help
you on your credibility regarding the

law.

Let me see if I got it right. Let's see
if I got it right.

Watch out for Scalia and Rehnquist.

Play up the facts.

Pay no attention to that man behind the
curtain.

Oh, don't bother with Thomas.

And leave out multiple sclerosis.

Is there anything else?

Yes, Mr. Wombo, one more thing.

I don't want to make you nervous, but
this is a really important case.

Not only for your client.

but for the civil liberties of all
Americans.

So the stakes are high.

Constitutional protection, police
procedures, and accordingly the pressure

you is very great. But you're up for it.

One thing.

Tomorrow.

Douglas.

Be yourself.

Don't try to be something you're not.

You're going to do just great.

Zag is in.

We're locking up in 20 minutes.

I won't be here that long.

Give me a second, Kimberly.

Kind of want to get the feel of the
place.

Tomorrow, it all happens.

I hope I don't embarrass myself.

Doug, you've earned the right to be in
this court.

You made that appeal. You deserve to be
here.

Thank you.

You're going to be great.

Make no mistake, I plan to kick your
ass, but I'll be cheering for you, too.

And me for you.

We are here.

We are actually here.

The Honorable, the Chief Justice and
Associate Justices of the Supreme Court

the United States.

Oyez, oyez, oyez.

All persons having business before the
Honorable Supreme Court of the United

States are admonished to draw near and
give their attention for the court is

sitting. God save the United States and
this Honorable Court.

We will hear arguments in People of
Wisconsin versus Brian Latham.

Mr. Bombau, you may proceed.

Mr.

Chief Justice, may it please the court,
I waited 51 years to get on this stage.

In that case, we'll give you 30 minutes.

I represent Brian Latham on the appeal
of his first -degree murder conviction,

which conviction resulted from a
statement obtained by unconstitutional

In Minnick v.

Mississippi, this court held, when
counsel is requested by the accused, all

interrogation must cease, and police may
not reinitiate any interrogation later

after the lawyer is gone.

And that's what happened here.

After I was gone, Deputy Lacus asked my
client to tell him where the body was.

It was an unconstitutional
interrogation.

Are you saying that after the accused
says he wants his lawyer, the police

even talk to him anymore?

The deputy can't even say, hey, how's
the weather, unless the attorney is

present? What I'm saying, Justice
Scalia, is that he can't reinitiate an

interrogation. How is the weather is not
an interrogation.

Except maybe in New England.

Tell me where the body is.

That's an interrogation.

Suppose I were arrested.

I ask for my lawyer.

Then the police reinitiate an
interrogation.

As a matter of law, I would have no
capacity for a voluntary statement.

Under Minnick, no.

It would be impossible for the Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court to

waive his right to a lawyer if the
police initiated the encounter.

Yes, that's the law.

Well, that seems absurd, Mr. Wambaugh.

Maybe Minnick is bad law.

Oh, it's Supreme Court precedent.

I would submit, Mr. Renshberg.

No, I mean Mr.

Rehnquist. Mr.

Chief Justice.

Sometimes I mispronounce names on
account of my multiple sclerosis.

Quiet down, everybody. I want it on the
record.

That I'm making no backdoor
negotiations.

It'll be on the record. I just want to
do this in here to protect their

She has a constitutional right. There is
no such express right in the

Constitution. Which entitles her to an
abortion without his consent. Quiet.

How can you even entertain such a
motion?

Because I'm a funny guy.

Fathers can't prevent abortions. The
Supreme Court has said so. The Supreme

Court also says that a constitutional
right can be waived. The Latham case

on this very minute. The issue being
whether the defendant waived his

constitutional right to counsel. If he
waived it, he loses it. The very same

principle is at work here.

She made no such waiver. She promised to
carry that baby to term. So what?

You want specific performance?

Come on, did you go to law school? I'll
choose my own legal remedies. Thank you

very much.

Why are you doing this?

I said quiet.

Why are you?

All right.

First, is there any dispute that it's
his child?

No. And Carter, are you sure you want to
challenge her on this?

I'm sure.

This is ridiculous.

Lady, it usually takes me a full five
minutes to dislike somebody.

I'm ahead of schedule.

All right, I'm going to review the law.

The law is very clear.

The Constitution provides... The
Constitution is silent on this matter.

The right to an abortion is only as
clear as the nine justices sitting on

Supreme Court.

Do you know who's sitting up there
today?

Didn't you meet with your client, Mr.
Wambaugh?

Yes, I did.

And didn't you apprise him of the risks
of speaking with police?

Of course.

In fact, I suspect, as a good lawyer
would, you gave him a rather explicit

warning. and that you caused your client
to understand his rights.

So why shouldn't we find his statement
here to be a voluntary waiver of his

right to counsel?

Because he was Corey.

Deputy Lackus knew my client was a
devout Catholic, and he preyed upon my

client's Christian sympathies to get
information.

Is it your position, Mr. Wamba, That the
incorporation of religion into a line

of questioning would mean that any
response per se as a matter of law could

be deemed to be voluntary?

Or is it your position that in this
particular encounter, given the

hypersensitivity of the accused, that as
a matter of fact, Mr.

Latham's response could not be regarded
as voluntary?

I would ask you to repeat the question,
but my time would be up.

I'm a character.

I would submit that in this particular
incident, Mr. Latham's response was not

voluntary.

Minnick said, as a matter of law, the
statement is automatically involuntary

when the police reinitiate the
encounter.

Well, how would the police ever get a
confession?

Almost every suspect immediately asks
for a lawyer.

If he's not allowed to change his mind,
if the police aren't even allowed to ask

him if he wants to change his mind, how
are we to obtain valid admissions?

Well, I'm concerned today about the
invalid ones.

Why shouldn't we apply an objective test
for each case?

If the waiver is voluntary, let it in.
If it feels coerced, keep it out.

Why apply this absolute restriction?

Because we need the absolutes.

We need a prophylactic that gives 100 %
assurance against chorus confessions. If

you give the police any margin, they'll
abuse it.

That is a pretty sweeping indictment.

Well, your honor, I don't mean to
suggest policemen are bad people.

I personally know the arresting officers
in this case.

Officers Maxine Stewart and Kenny
Lockers. People I admire.

But they're caught up in a system and a
society that is gripped with fear.

And when afraid enough...

Instead, people become willing to
suspend civil rights.

It's going on all over this country. It
went on in this trial when Judge Bone

stood up and said, I don't give a damn
what the Supreme Court says. The hell

with his right to counsel.

Well, that's what he said.

And he said, if the Supreme Court has a
problem with that, they can come and get

him.

And the people of Rome, enlightened
people, good people, they stood on their

feet and cheered Judge Bone when he
said, to hell with the Constitution.

They cheered.

That's what's going on in America today.
People are afraid.

There's pressure on the police to do
everything to catch the bad guys.

And they are doing everything, including
crossing constitutional barriers.

That's why we need the Supreme Court.

When the police go too far, that's where
you come in.

Well, they went too far in this case.

They denied Brian Latham his
constitutional rights.

So this is where you come in.

Hi.

Hi.

I've been thinking about how all of this
is none of my business.

And I know that I should leave you
alone.

But then it occurred to me that maybe
the reason that you're doing this is

because you're so alone.

Surrogacy is an extreme step, Carter.

Going to court to enforce it, I'm not
going to lie to you. I'm worried about

you. What is so crazy? That I would like
to have a child?

That I want to share in the experience
of parenting like everybody?

I know I could adopt, and maybe I will
someday, but I wanted my own flesh and

blood, too, you know?

Carry on the Pike name.

I'm 38, Joe.

I can cling to the idea that maybe I'll
meet somebody.

Have children together.

But I also have to recognize the
reality.

I'm 38.

And I've never been in a relationship
with anybody. Never.

I didn't know that.

Yeah, well, it's not something I...

Look, I'm not denying how ridiculous
this is, doing what I'm doing.

What's that old saying? Behind every
desperate act, you'll find a desperate

You're not a desperate man, Carter.

I have nobody in my life to love, Jill.
What does that make me if not desperate?

This was no interrogation.

Deputy Locos volunteered to leave.

Brian Latham at least implicitly
consented to the conversation.

And that's what this was, a
conversation.

There was no accusation, no attempt to
elicit incriminating evidence.

Simply a question.

Do you know where we might find Susan
Ingram?

To categorize that as an interrogation,
to say it rises to the level of

coercion, is completely contrary to
fact.

You're maintaining that Minnick doesn't
apply because this isn't an

interrogation. That's correct, Your
Honor.

Counselor. He asked the suspect to point
him to the body.

The suspect tells him.

It's a pretty incriminating answer, and
exactly the kind of answer that the

deputy was looking for.

I maintain that Deputy Locco's intent
was not to elicit incriminating

It doesn't matter. If the police ask a
question that can reasonably elicit an

incriminating answer, it's an
interrogation.

You're familiar with Rhode Island v.
Innes? Yes, I am.

Then how did you get around Minnick?

The law says that you cannot re
-interrogate after the accused makes a

for counsel.

Which is exactly what Deputy Lacoste
did.

How do you get around that?

Are you suggesting Minnick doesn't
apply?

Or are you advocating that we overturn
Minnick?

I am suggesting to this court that
Minnick be overturned.

This court erred in Minnick v.
Mississippi.

Well, isn't this exciting?

Mr. Chief Justice, you yourself flagged
the problem.

It's become impossible for the police to
get a confession.

Now, the point of Miranda and all these
prophylactic protections is to guard

against compulsory self -incrimination.

We want defendants to know their legal
rights.

We want their statements to be
intentional and voluntary.

Minnick has distorted this protection to
a ridiculous extreme.

It establishes a systematic formula that
can result in a complete travesty not

only of justice, but of common sense.

To hold as a matter of law a suspect
can't change his mind about having

in the room?

To say he automatically lacks capacity
to make voluntary statements? Nothing in

the Constitution supports this type of
premise.

Nothing. These are court -articulated
protections that have expanded into

constitutional fairyland.

If you want to stretch a ruling on
Minnick to its most illogical extreme,

need look no further than this case.

Brian Latham was a sane, competent man
who knew his legal rights.

He'd been given Miranda.

He'd been warned by his lawyer.

Take a look at those trial transcripts.
This man's testimony was precise.

He clearly knew what words to choose.

His statement to Kenny Lacos was
knowing.

Intentional and voluntary.

And we are applying an automatic formula
to redefine it as involuntary and throw

it out.

Well, if the Minnick test results in
such an atrocious rape of the simple

then Minnick should be reversed.

Suppose the suspect is not so savvy as
Mr. Latham.

Maybe he's more easily tricked.

How do we prevent the police from
exploiting that situation?

Maybe the best way is simply to draw an
absolute.

If he asks for a lawyer, stay away.

That's simple counsel.

Why can't the police just stay away
until the lawyer gets there?

We can err too much on trusting the
police, I guess, or on trusting them too

little.

Which error, in your opinion, would be
more consistent with our Constitution?

I don't think you need to make either
error.

I think your rulings should trust law
and order and trust that the underlying

intent of the Constitution is to ensure
a free nation.

Crime is making us all less free.

Now, the Constitution is certainly there
to protect the guilty as well as the

innocent. I don't dispute that.

But the objective of the Constitution is
not to set the guilty free.

The people of this country need to know
that.

They need to hear that from this court
today.

Please step back, sir. I won't let you
back. Take your hands off me.

What's your name?

My name is Michael Duffy.

Never hit me, Mr. Duffy.

She contracted away her right to an
abortion. She gave it away when she

into the circus. Your Honor, that is
completely without merit.

Husbands have tried to sue mothers for
emotional distress after abortion.

But the court threw out those cases.
Why?

Because there is no precedent. Those
were lower court decisions never ruled

at the appellate level. Excuse me, I
would like to finish my argument. Will

let me finish? I'll finish.

Excuse me, Your Honor.

Could I be heard?

It would be refreshing.

Let's have the lawyers take their seats.

I'm not going to get into the abortion
debate, whether the fetus is a life or

not. I know that it's a legal question
for the lawyers.

I also know that it's a woman's personal
choice as to whether she considers it a

life or not.

I would just like to say that the
father, it's my personal belief that it

is a life, that it's my child.

And that is why I feel I must try to
save it.

I also know, according to the Supreme
Court, I,

as the father, have no rights here.

Legally, I'm irrelevant.

And I think that's wrong.

Without completely vitiating pro
-choice, we should find some way to give

father some rights. After all, it's my
child.

Before the Supreme Court can address
this question, the case has to get

And in order for that to happen, we need
some brave trial court judge who's

willing to make a ruling that putative
fathers do count in this decision.

I've listened to your rulings for years,
and I don't know any judge who has more

courage than you.

I guess I'm asking for me.

And my child.

I'm asking you to be the most brave
you've ever been.

I need five minutes.

That's too much time on minutes.

It's like a ball to Brewer, played up
the court.

You got it, Brewer.

How soon before they rule?

There's no telling. Could be quick,
could take months.

I can't believe I said it.

Rentschberg.

Mr. Wambaugh, you were fantastic.

I was?

You stood up in the Supreme Court and
were equal to nine judges.

I couldn't believe how good you were.

I wish Miriam could have seen it.

Brian Latham could have seen it.

I saw it.

I was very proud of you.

Watching you fight the way you did, you
made all lawyers proud.

Thank you, Kimberly.

And you did, too.

Very much.

Be seated.

On pregnancy matters, Roe versus Wade
gives all the rights to the mother.

The father has none before viability.

The Weber argument was a novel one, Mr.
Dell, but...

to enforce a contract claim to prevent a
woman from terminating the pregnancy,

that would be against public policy.

The only way for me to grant Carter
Pike's request would be to flat -out

the Supreme Court, which I've done.

One thing about being old, it can make
you brave.

But I'm not that brave, Carter.

This case involves... a baby, two
parents, and a controversy

that no judge can ever truly solve.

The issue of abortion is a deeply
personal one.

I am neither wise nor brave enough to be
Solomon.

Plaintiff's petition denied.

Miss Halford is free to terminate the
pregnancy.

Adjourned. They

came at me,

especially Scalia.

But I fought them, Brian, I fought them
with all I had.

When will they rule?

Well, there's no telling, but it would
be nice if those Reagan appointees could

retire first.

But the law is still on our side.

Minnick is the key.

Now, I ordered a transcript, so you'll
be able to read every word.

Douglas Wombo and the Supreme Court.

I had a moment.

Kimberly, what are you doing here?

This came in.

What?

How could they rule so fast?

Our appeal was denied.

What does it mean?

What does it mean?

It's over.

We've lost.

You said the law was with us.

You said they follow the law.

I don't know what to say.

But the law just changed.