All language subtitles for SHARE THIS! THE DIGITAL ID DOMINO EFFECT! NYC LAW WILL LIMIT TEENS TO 1 HOUR OF SOCIAL MEDIA PER DAY

YouTube says it has had enough of
vaccine misinformation on its site. And

stories from phony sites to run circles
around major news outlets.

Many people don't know the difference
between something real and something

created to deceive them.

Open your eyes.

Have you ever had this feeling that
something was terribly wrong with the

that we live in, but you couldn't figure
out just what it was?

Then you've come to the right place.
Secret societies, mystery religions, and

the Illuminati have been controlling our
reality since the beginning of time.

But not anymore, because there is an
awakening happening, and you are about

become a part of it. Wake up, because
this is A Call for an Uprising.

A New York City council bill could soon
limit how much time kids spend on social

media. The bill proposes calls for those
under 17 to be limited to one hour a

day on social media unless a parent
approves more time.

It would also ban targeted ads aimed at
kids as lawmakers try to address growing

concerns about social media's impact on
mental health.

Supporters say it's about protecting
young people, but critics argue it could

hard to enforce and may even raise free
speech issues. The bill is now headed to

a city council hearing later this month.

this is a call for an uprising welcome
to today's show obviously anybody who

sees a story like this about limiting
social media for children is probably

going to be on board with that story
because of course we know social media

nothing but poison can it be used for
good in some ways like youtube channels

like this perhaps yes but overall

We can all agree that social media is
toxic, it is poisonous, and it is

the minds of children along with,
obviously, the never -ending large

globs of fake information that people
are consuming on a day -in, day -out

basis. This isn't just the old days
where you turn on the TV.

And you're getting fed propaganda from
Channel 2 or Channel 4, ABC or NBC.

We have social influencers. We have
constant media everywhere.

Even media that you don't think is
intentional media that's trying to

and manipulate your thoughts is.

That's what I mentioned, social media
influencers for these famous people that

they've put out there who are makeup
artists or doing other things that start

talking about politics or things going
on in the world. They are constantly

trying to warp and manipulate your
perspective of what's happening.

And that's how they blur the lines of
what's real and what's not, because we

know the majority of the news is
actually scripted and fake. So when we

story like this, we should cheer. But of
course, what really should be occurring

is that the parents in the household
should have control over what their

children are actually doing, which means
you shouldn't be buying your children

phones, for starters, let alone buying
them phones and allowing them to be on

social media. But this is where the
state comes in. This is where Big

comes in and says, look.

You can't parent your own kids,
obviously, so let us do it. And this

them trying to protect you, just like
when we saw the COVID pandemic occur. It

wasn't about the government trying to
help you and giving you a vaccine that

will make you immune to a disease that
they created. It was really a disease

that was coming from.

Oh, let's just say frequencies that are
all around us from towers specifically

that were put up at that time period.

It was about, of course, the government
trying to get inside of your body and

having control over your body. That's
why the government was never caring

getting you healthy or getting you
better. The government was caring about

manipulating you into doing what they
wanted you to do, which is why they

you with free.

Visa gift cards, free meals at
McDonald's, free lap dances, free

whatever they could think of, the
government was offering it to you if you

and put this poison inside of your body,
which we all obviously realized was the

government ploy, even though there's
still suckers out there that are still

lining up at CVS and Walgreens,
poisoning themselves, believe it or not,

year 2026, which shows you how far gone
common thought and actually thinking and

having a real perspective on what's
happening in the world, how far gone we

from that.

It is a world that is completely under
manipulation. So this story, you have to

look at it and you have to say, well,
what are they getting at? Because

obviously every common person, their
brain goes down to a delta wave when

they're watching television. They're
getting programmed. They're thinking,

is great.

Not realizing, wait a minute, if the
government's doing this, then the

government has an agenda behind it
because the government doesn't care

and they don't care about my children.
They've proven that time and time.

Again, so what does this mean, right?
What is this New York City bill that

limit minor social media use to one hour
every day? Well, what this means is how

are they going to do that? How do you
think they're going to limit your child

and your home from being online for one
hour a day? What do you think, the

phone's going to automatically shut off?

No, of course not. This is what leads to
a digital ID, which leads to

biometrics, of course, for starters,
which means that they'll be able to

the individual who is on the specific
device, and they'll be able to shut it

when they choose. Now, of course, this
will be what the world looks like five

ten years from now with Agenda 2030 and
having full -on control over your

electricity and your water in your home
with all these smart devices where the

government's going to force you into
rationing by telling you it has

to do with climate change and your
carbon footprint.

But this right here, nobody thinks. They
just go, oh, that's a good idea. My kid

shouldn't be on.

Facebook for an hour a day. I don't know
what they're doing. Well, for starters,

as a parent, you should know what your
kid's doing. That's your number one

priority in life is your children.

Your number one priority in life should
not be you.

It should not be your job. It should not
be things that you enjoy doing for fun,

recreation. It should be focusing on
your kids and policing them. That's the

of what a parent is. But, of course, we
live in a world where the parents are

allowing the system to raise their
children, which, again, is part of the

propaganda we've seen with women getting
forced into the workplace, telling you

that being a mom isn't a job.

And thus the government is obviously the
one raising your children, getting them

in the institutions at a young age. The
parents just go, you know what, let's

get them into school. We were in school.
We're fine, even though they're not

fine because they believe in a world of
lies.

Then the kids are just indoctrinated
with a false reality of the world and

history of the world.

And they're stuck in the system and
they're programmed to believe that

the truth, that we go to the moon and we
do all these things that we don't

actually do. And this is another way of
the government saying, hey, look, we'll

help raise your kids. The parents are
going, that's a great idea.

Let's limit it. But they don't even
think for five seconds, well, how would

government actually do it? So you may
have heard some of these stories that

out there, right?

Mark Zuckerberg, Meta, and YouTube
designed addictive products that harm

people, the jury found, right? Jury in
Los Angeles awards plaintiff damages of

$6 million.

These stories that are coming out now
about Zuckerberg and Facebook and

are making people addicted to their
platforms, which is causing people to

suicide and causing people that mental
illness and mental health problems and

leading to deep depression.

If you think for five seconds that you
can sue Facebook or you can sue YouTube

and get in court, you know how many
people would have sued them by now?

about how many people were removed from
YouTube. I told many of you out there a

year or two ago before I got this
channel back, I attempted to find

sue YouTube for discrimination because
there were certain channels with similar

content that were allowed up.

It's obviously not – I wouldn't say
content that's extremely similar to mine

because most of these people who talk
about similar topics still believe the

news is real and still feed you these
stories like Epstein, et cetera, as if

they're true stories.

But nonetheless, I tried to find a
lawyer. Oh, I had a lawyer tell me,

you'd have a better chance of being in
the KKK and suing YouTube over

discrimination as a racist white person
than you would be as a conspiracy

theorist or anybody out there.

Defense, advanced research.

project agency in the United States of
America. The, you know, high risk, high

reward research and development. It
creates through breakthrough

It's all bull crap. It's all a cover for
all of this stuff. You know, GPS,

drones, stealth technology. It's all
stuff that they're implementing on us.

Facebook is no different. That's why
they immediately came out with movies on

Facebook, how it was created, about
Zuckerberg stealing the idea from these

twins. They write these stories so that
you cannot get it through your head when

you hear people like me tell you that
these are government creations.

No, that's not a government creation.
That's Zuckerberg. He did this. This is

how he became big and famous. That's how
Musk became big and famous. That's how

this guy became big and famous. It's all
make -believe because if you knew it

was government technology, you wouldn't
allow it in your life.

LifeLog, again, the LifeLog project
created by the Pentagon, shut down

4, 2004.

How convenient. The same day that
Facebook was founded. If you look at

DARPA is and you read through exactly
what LifeLog's DARPA is, you will see

exactly what Facebook is.

LifeLog, was a project of the
Information Processing Technologies

Defense Advanced Research Project, ACD
DARPA, of the U .S. Department of

Defense. According to its bid
solicitation pamphlet in 2003, it was to

ontology -based system that captures,
stores, and makes accessible the flow of

one's personal experience in and
interactions with the world in order to

a broad spectrum of associate assistants
and other system capabilities. You

might say, that doesn't sound like
Facebook. Exactly what it is. The

of LifeLog.

The concept was to be able to trace the
threads of an individual's life in terms

of events, states, relationships, okay,
literally reading your mind. Because

think about what Facebook is. Not only
are you telling people where you are,

you're talking to, who you're dating,
where you're living, where you're

You're telling them what's on your mind,
right? And now we see that with

Instagram and TwitterX as well.

Think about it. An event occurs.
Somebody goes on there and posts, oh, my

died a year ago today. And they tell
you, this is how the government gets

your mind. Something happens
politically. You go online and you post

feel about it. This is how the
government gets inside your mind without

being inside your mind, although we know
they have the technology to actually be

inside of your mind. So LifeLook aimed
to compile a massive electronic database

of every activity and relationship a
person engages in. Does it sound like

Facebook? It's exactly what it is. So we
have Meta and YouTube.

Being found guilty deliberately. They're
not paying a penny to a family. They're

not in threat of being eliminated. What
they're trying to do is convince you

that we need regulations and
restrictions.

So, of course, every person out there is
going to go, yeah, maybe we do. Maybe

we are too addicted. But they don't go,
well, how in the world would the

government restrict it?

Well, for starters, what have they done
recently? Age verification, right?

We've seen it on YouTube.

Oh, if we think you're watching content
that you shouldn't be watching, like a

call for an uprising and you're 15, we
don't want you to wake up or you're 12.

We don't want you to wake up and
question the crap you're learning at

We're going to do age verification. So
if you're, if you put in there that

you're, you know, you're 12, we're going
to block the channel. But if you put in

there that you're 21, maybe we'll let
you watch the channel, right? This is

verification process we're using now,
but it's obviously a flawed system

you can put in any age you want. Who's
actually putting in the age?

that they are, right? Perfect example.

This is another way they're bringing
this in. It's starting with these age

verifications, but it's moving to
digital ID.

The stuff we've heard in Texas,
conservative state.

Normally, conservatives would not be on
board with this type of stuff because

they say it violates their rights and it
gives the government too much power.

But... They use pornography.

We can all sit here and we should just
go, well, pornography shouldn't exist.

shouldn't be on the Internet. People are
addicted to porn. People are coming up

with sick thoughts and sick ideas
because of porn.

We see all these murders that continue
to happen, abductions of children, more

so at a rate than we've ever seen
before. And I'm not talking about the

underground stuff with the CIA
trafficking children. I'm talking about

driver who abducts a kid who has this
impulse to go after a kid because he's

seeing all this disgusting pornography.

This is what pornography is fed to.

OK, an addiction that continues to grow
where people want to live out these

fantasies that they're seeing through
pornography. So we could all sit here

we should just be going. There shouldn't
be pornography.

It shouldn't be allowed on the Internet.
But instead, of course, we know the

government wants that out there because
it corrupts people's minds. It makes

people sinners, makes people just
mentally unhinged and sick and willing

commit crimes that they normally
probably wouldn't have ever thought of

they saw some of these sexual acts being
committed.

So the government comes in and they go,
well, we want to protect your kids from

this stuff. And the parents go, yes, we
need to do that.

So they go, well, we're going to pass
age verification for porn sites.

And everyone goes, yes, let's do that,
right? So that's how it starts.

We get these age verifications in. But
as all of you have seen, right, these

screenshots. If you type in age
verification for websites on Google

Google Search, right, are you over 21?

You have to meet. This isn't just for
pornography. It's websites that, you

could be selling guns or something like
that.

Will they make you click yes or no?

Now, we all know that anybody could just
click yes who's 12 years old, and, of

course, they probably do. They're not
sitting there going, oh, darn it, I'm

21. I guess I got to go away, right?
This is the beginning of how they bring

a digital ID by having these
verifications in place first, and then,

we'll eventually hear stories about.

Oh, a 12 -year -old went to a website he
shouldn't have went to and killed

himself. And over and over you'll hear
things like that, and the government

say, well, we've got to do something.
The age verification isn't good enough.

what can we do?

Well, we can do things like we're seeing
implemented in countries like

Australia. The government can begin
developing a new digital ID system,

But we have to gain your trust.

First, because, again, there's pushback
on a digital ID, just like there's

pushback even on the real ID.

The government knows this, so they have
to come up with stories to convince you

to get a digital ID in place without you
realizing it's in place. So they're

starting with children by parents going,
you know what?

My kid will have to have some type of
digital ID that way.

Even if I'm away on business or I'm at
work or the kid's up in his room,

of giving the kid a phone or allowing
him access to a computer, we'll let the

government monitor it for us. And he
only gets an hour a day, and then it'll

shut off automatically, right? There'll
be a little timer in the corner. But

first, he has to have a digital ID so
it's verified. This is my kid. This is

kid on any different device because I'm
sure there'll be stories about kids

getting their parents' devices and going
on the internet longer than they

should.

I mean, it's very easy for them to
manipulate.

These stories to convince people out
there that there needs to be something

stricter in place to protect the
children. Because it always starts with

children. They play on people's
heartstrings. They say this about

people like me and you. And they're
like, we're going to put an hour

on a call for an uprising.

I'm going to put an hour restriction on
Joe Blow. I'm going to put an hour

restriction on George Glass.

People go, that's not fair.

I work online. I do this online. I'm not
looking anything bad online. You aren't

going to tell me what we can do. So it
starts with the children.

And then it eventually spreads to the
adults because, of course, they'll do

things like what we see in the U .K.,
digital ID mandatory to work in the U

And then adults go, well, I need digital
ID to work. And they go, well, it has

nothing to do with you and the Internet.

That's just for the kids and the ID for
the kids to make sure we can protect

them on the Internet. The ID for you is
voter fraud, immigration, right? That's

what they're convincing adults of.

telling them that we need digital ID for
adults so we can keep immigrants out

and we can stop this voter fraud and
mail -in ballots, right?

And what this leads to is biometrics.
You've probably seen it. I've covered it

million times. All this crap every time
you log in, right? I've logged into,

I've had over 100 channels.

You know, I forget the number, but it's
in the 80s of channels I've had that

have been shut down by YouTube. I've
constantly had to make new emails and

channels. And every time I've done that,
With YouTube, for those of you that

don't know, you have to put a phone
number in.

So I've gone through burner phones.

I had to get burner phones. I'm like a
drug dealer or something trying to

a YouTube channel. I'm going to go buy a
burner phone because how many phone

numbers can you have? You need a unique
phone number for each channel you

create. And then when those channels get
deleted, obviously I just dismiss of

the burner phone. But you can't get back
into any of those Gmail accounts. I've

lost all the Gmail accounts because they
make you do two -step verification.

That's my point.

Two -step verification. If you don't
have the phone number, guess what? You

the middle finger. You can't contact
anyone at Google.

But if you do passkey, which I'm sure
every time you've gone into Amazon,

time you've gone into some of these
websites, they're trying to push key

passkeys onto you where you could just
do a face scan or a fingerprint or a

device pin, which they give you the
device pin, which they don't want you to

that choice.

Because they want you to just go, oh,
it's annoying. I can't remember my PIN

number. Let me just do the facial scan
every time I log into Amazon. I won't

asked these questions and bombarded to
put in a phone number or a code.

You may have noticed every time you log
into a website now, they literally are

making codes sent to your email account
or to your phone.

You constantly have to put in a code
everywhere you go. Every time you call

somebody on customer support, they're
like, we're going to send a code to your

phone. This is all being done by design
deliberately.

again, to condition you into accepting a
digital ID and biometrics because it's

easier and more convenient because
they're annoying the crap out of

right now, telling you, oh, all of a
sudden the Internet's dangerous. It

dangerous 10 years ago, even though
technology's supposed to be advanced.

Everybody's stealing everyone's
information and hacking and everything,

have to constantly annoy you and send
you codes that you have to manually type

in. Or you could just do biometrics. So
people eventually give in to biometrics.

So you might hear this story and go,
well, they're not going to pass this in

York. Right. They're not going to pass
some type of thing with an hour limit on

kids because it's too much. It's already
being done. Australia is doing this

right now and it's being done in
Virginia.

All right. Here's a Virginia law. I'll
show you the video where they're

social media screen time. I keep an eye
on the, you know, and I'm not going to

sit here and judge people as parents.
It's based off a clip from the fake

But watch how this mom even responds.
She's like, I think it's a great idea. I

think it's a wonderful idea. Then they
can interact with other kids.

Then I have to worry about what my kids
look at. How did you just be a mom?

How did you be a mom?

You get the phone out of the kid's hand,
or you actually parent your child,

which means you watch what they're
doing, you're aware of what they're

constantly doing, so they're not getting
manipulated and poisoned and corrupted

by the system. But instead, of course,
this is the problem.

All of these parents are still children.
They're not responsible.

So what does that mean? It means that
they're looking for big brother to raise

their kids for them because they're
lazy, they're stupid, or they're too

narcissistic and distracted with worldly
things to do it themselves.

Here's what's happening in Virginia, and
it's going to spread to all states

eventually because of stories like the
one that they're fabricating with

Zuckerberg, Meta, and YouTube telling
you that Oh, my goodness. They have to

something. People are too addicted to
social media. The government wanted you

addicted to social media. They got you
addicted to social media. And that's

of the plan for the digital ID because
you're going to have to make a choice

eventually. Or you're going to have to
give up your phone. You're going to have

to give up all of these things that
you're now addicted to or rely on for

information like the Internet.

You're not going to be able to use it
unless you have a digital ID. But here

Virginia. I know this question is
constantly on your minds. Are your kids

spending too much time on social media?

Starting January 1st, Virginia state law
will set limits on how much teenagers

under the age of 16 can spend on social
media platforms.

The new law already faces legal
challenges, but one of its co -sponsors

is confident the courts will uphold
what's become a growing trend, state

legislatures pushing back against big
tech.

And he spoke with our John Barr earlier
today about a law that is about to lead

to some interesting conversations in
Virginia households.

Megan Capella leads a house divided.

She's all for limiting her kids' time on
social media. Her oldest, 13 -year -old

son, Mike Tucker, not so much.

I think it's good to limit the amount of
time they're on social media.

I don't know what videos and information
they have access to, so I think it's

good to kind of cut them off. But not
only that, also maybe give them some

time to spend with each other and not
just have their face buried in the

We shouldn't have this one thing.

That is like taking up and sucking up so
much of people's time. It's not

healthy. Senator Skyler Van Valkenburgh
introduced the bill that would become

law January 1st in Virginia, limiting
social media time to one hour per

per day for teens under 16, unless those
teens get parental consent to get more

screen time.

We are going to see kids on these apps
less, and we are going to see them more

engaged with their academics or their
friends or whatever they're doing.

And is there going to be bumps along the
road? 100 percent, you know, in the

implementation of it, in the enforcement
of it. But I think like with the cell

phone bans, we don't want perfect to be
the enemy of the good because we know

that good can be really good. Already,
there are legal challenges to a law not

even on the books.

An organization called Net Choice,
representing social media companies like

and Google, filed a lawsuit in November
claiming limiting social media even for

kids. was a denial of their free speech
rights.

The Constitution leaves the power to
decide what speech is appropriate for

minors where it belongs, with their
parents, the lawsuit states.

For her part, Megan Capella was shocked,
as we were, to find out how much her

son Mike uses his phone each day.

Right here. What is it? Daily average,
11 hours and 43 minutes. 11 hours and 43

minutes?

Parents concerned about eye -popping
screen times like that will soon have

control in Virginia.

Starting January 1st, they can either
keep the one -hour time limit or provide

consent for more screen time, meaning a
law that's already being challenged in

court is sure to be challenged in
households across the Commonwealth.

For 7 News, I'm John Barr.

John, thank you so much for that. And
now it is your turn to weigh in on this

topic. Take out your phone and use the
camera to scan that code on your screen

so you can jump in on this poll and
share your thoughts here. The question

do you support legislation limiting
social media use for minors? Yes or no?

you will see, of course, the real -time
updates as you vote right now. More than

half, 56%, say yes. 44 % of people say
no. They don't support limiting time

of... Kids on social media apps. So
we're going to keep checking back in on

these numbers throughout the evening if
you want to weigh in there.

And of course, you see the poll in the
video. Do you support legislation

limiting social media for minors?

56 % say yes, and they'll continue to
grow because the more fake stories they

put out there about people killing
themselves because of social media, the

people will support legislation that
limits social media use for minors. And

reality of the matter is we shouldn't
have social media. It's gay.

We don't need it. And I'm not counting
places like YouTube where you can get

different information, but we know
obviously YouTube has been fully

Okay? And you go, oh, what about Rumble?
Look, we know a lot of these

influencers are bought and paid for.

Are these guys that come out of nowhere,
the Tim Pools?

Just the clown world that continues to
talk to you about these news events like

they're real, like Charlie Kirk or this
Trump assassination or these school

shootings that happen. They don't talk
about government, deep state, how it

really works and how the news is
actually a simulation. They carry out

black op events by filming them,
sometimes on a green screen, sometimes

AI. And then they tell you that these
events actually occurred. And then these

guys talk about it like they're real
instead of saying, hey, you know, our

perspective of the world is is blurred.
And that's why we're all divided,

because we're being manipulated
constantly.

by this propaganda machine.

So, of course, as we go, people are
going to agree more and more that we

legislation instead of just eliminating
social media.

And this is where the domino effect
comes in, right? The chain reaction. One

event leads to more, right? Like we see
going on in Australia, right? Because

Australia has the ban on social media.

What are some of the things they're
doing around it? Well, we cannot let

ourselves be bullied. News Corp boss
pushes for social media reform because

there's too much misinformation, which
means people like me, they consider us

misinformation if you critically think
or question their fake, bogus news,

everyone should question because the
stuff they show us is so fake, including

these moon landings that are so bogus
where you can see the green screens

used. And all they have to do is come
out and say, oh, these people are

conspiracy nuts. And that type of mind
control works on them because they've

been programmed to think tinfoil hat
lives in their grandma's basement, all

these stereotypes.

They dismiss actual evidence that we all
present versus the absolute nonsense

that they show us on the news. But this
is another story, right? The way kids

are getting bullied online, leading to
more and more restrictions, and then the

government having control over who is
saying what online.

Cybersecurity Minister Claire O 'Neill,
just about every problem that we have as

a country, is either being exacerbated
by or caused by social media.

And we're not seeing a skerrick of
responsibility taken by these companies.

And why is this happening?

Because on social media, bad behaviour
is good for business.

The social media giants, they profit
from evil videos.

They profit from bullying.

They profit from online con artists.

They profit from glamorising eating
disorders.

In the words of a British father who,
like Wayne, lost their child to suicide,

they monetise misery.

In Medda's case, according to a recent
report in the UK's Sunday Times

that profit is a staggering US $136
million every single day.

It's understandable that we focus on the
content that is causing the harm, but

the other truly damaging aspects of all
this is the partnership between the

content and the conduct of the
businesses that distribute it.

The content and the conduct are partners
in crime.

We know this is the case from Facebook
whistleblower Frances Haugen.

She says that Facebook knew its
algorithms were damaging teenagers'

health. It knew that posts instigated
ethnic violence in countries like

Ethiopia.

And it failed to curb misinformation
before the Capitol Hill riots on January

6th.

Around the world, people are demanding
that the days of the digital Wild West

have to stop.

The algorithms and those that operate
them in total secrecy are the biggest

villains.

It's time we made them accountable.

Right, and then from there...

where you hear them in Australia saying
we need, you know, we have to follow,

everyone needs to be held accountable.
So you're going to be arrested if you're

saying something online that we consider
misinformation, which means if you're

questioning what we're doing, you're
going to be arrested because you're

convincing some other kid out there that
what we're doing is wrong and that's a

crime, right?

And then you get the other guys with the
World Economic Forum, Mr. Comeback,

talking about ending anonymity online.
See how this whole thing works with

dominoes? You go from the story about
limiting time online, getting a digital

in place. Then, oh, well, with a digital
ID in place, you'll have to have a

digital ID to upload.

Then we'll decide if what people are
uploading is poisonous or toxic or not,

like questioning the vaccine, which we
were all right about. We're not even

questioning. It's just 100 % proving
that it was poison.

Well, they took all of us offline for
years and years and then let us come

because, oh, well, we're in a different
time now. And, of course, we're all back

online because they're having AI trained
off of us. But nonetheless, we moved to

that. and bullying online to stuff like
this, where they say being anonymous

online should be illegal. We need to
know what everyone's doing and saying

online so we can hold them accountable
and arrest them for thought.

I propose putting an end to anonymity on
social media.

In our countries, no one can walk the
streets with a mask on their face or

a car without a license plate.

No one can send packages without showing
an ID or buy a hunting weapon without

giving their name.

And yet, we are allowing people to roam
freely on social networks without

linking their profiles to a real
identity.

This is paving the way for
misinformation,

hate speech, and cyber harassment.

Because it is facilitating the use of
bots.

And it is allowing people to act without
being held accountable for their

actions.

Such an anomaly cannot continue.

In a democracy, citizens have the right
to privacy, not to anonymity or

impunity. Because with those two, social
coexistence would be

impossible.

That is why I believe we must push
forward the principle of...

pseudonymity as the functioning element
of social media, and forced all these

platforms to link every user account to
an European digital identity wallet.

This way, citizens could use nicknames
if they want, but in the case of a

crime, public authorities would be able
to connect those nicknames to real

people and hold them responsible.

Because accountability is not an
obstacle to freedom of speech.

It is an essential complement to it.

On social media user, or much better to
say,

one social media user, one real ID.

This is the only way to really ensure
that minors do not access inappropriate

content. that people who commit crimes
are banned or prosecuted from social

networks, and that the millions of fake
profiles that exist and influence the

public conversation are removed.

Right, it's the end of anonymity. And of
course, this was even discussed in the

Bill Gates documentary with Lady
Barfbag, where they're openly talking

oh, this person says that online. We
need to put an end to it because we need

control the information flow because if
anyone out there is critically thinking

and questioning us, they should be
thrown in jail because they're a threat

our democracy.

I think it's not something that we can
just blame social media for not making

sure that they have better practices.

Well, we made it so easy to just post
anything, you know, so somebody who, you

know, on the playground would have been
rude and nasty. A few dozen kids hear

that, that's not great, you know.

but hopefully they'll grow up. But
you're sitting in your own home. It's

you know, you just sit there and type.

What I think right away is, you know, if
enough people were on the playground

shouting at each other at the same time,
I feel like someone might calm it down.

On that playground, if, you know, things
go too out of control, there was some

adult who would show up. And even when
you attack somebody on the playground,

you can see their face.

When you're sitting there typing and
you're feeling like you're so clever,

don't see that human reaction that makes
you think twice about it. And even when

you attack somebody on the playground,
you can see their face.

Whereas when you're sitting there typing
and you're feeling like you're so

clever, you don't see that human
reaction that makes you think twice

it. And then you might say, well, that's
never going to really happen. But it

is. It is, and it's already happening
because China's the blueprint, right?

talked about it a million times here.
Well, the in -system in China, I've

you Black Mirror. Remember Black Mirror,
the social credit score?

This is what it looks like. This is what
they want.

Oh, you said these things online.

Oh, you didn't like these pictures. Oh,
you gave somebody a low review, right?

Think about the review system with Uber,
with everything else, Yelp, right?

We're all being conditioned into a
system that looks like this.

And then if they decide your behavior
isn't good, well, you're not going to be

able to board a plane.

There's one standby seat on another
plane leaving tonight.

That's reserved for members of our prime
flight program. You've got to be a 4 .2

or over to qualify.

Oh, I'm a 4 .2. I'm afraid you're
actually a 4 .183.

You're just so close.

There's just nothing I can do.

Christ, I mean, surely. I'm going to
have to ask you to moderate your

there. Can you call the supervisor?

I cannot do that. Can you just call the
supervisor? I cannot do that. Okay,

that's profanity. We're zero tolerance
on profanity. I'm sorry, it's just...

Yeah, I have to serve Nick. Help me!

Well,

of course, that looks like hell on
earth, but most people would say, well,

that'll never happen.

Because most people aren't educated on
what's actually happening in the world,

and people who think they are are only
being educated by control information,

left -right shills that are out there
that keep them stuck in the left -right

paradigm. where the only news they
report on is something that the other

doing, and they go, oh my gosh, the
other side wants to approve a bill that

allows transgenders to read to kids in
school.

Oh, and then the other side wants, you
know, more gun, you know, to be allowed

to have guns that have larger
capacities. These ridiculous stories

just stay stuck in. When you look at
China, everybody united the hell going

over there, but you could see over in
China with this social credit system

have that looks just like out of a black
mirror, that the people are under

such... deep mind control, just like we
see now, that they actually like it.

They're like, this is great because they
think it's like a video game. Ooh, I

get rewarded for good behavior. I can
get an extra stick of celery because I

agreed it was okay for the government to
shoot some civilians in the head

because they disagreed with the
government deciding that they wanted to

their children out of their household
because the government decided they

only have one kid and not two. Yeah,
that's life in China, folks. And this is

what it looks like.

They're constantly monitored by facial
recognition cameras that are able to

instantly put a face to a name.

Now the Chinese are also ranked, given a
mark out of a possible 950 points.

A score in the 700s is considered good.

Around the 500 mark is not.

For now, the number is a sort of bank
credit rating, keeping track of

spending habits.

I think being ranked is a good thing. A
society has to have rules.

It forces us to be well -behaved.

It may seem scary, but it's just like
that here. We're used to it, and anyway

don't have a choice.

But in an effort to keep all of its
subjects in line, Beijing is taking the

system a step further in 2020.

It's aggregating data gathered by banks,
private companies and the state to rate

if someone's a good or bad citizen.

By using the most data possible, the so
-called big data, the system will play

an important role in rebuilding a moral
society.

The state will go over every detail of a
person's life with a fine -tooth comb.

A financial situation, spending habits,
career, even behavior on social media.

Criticizing the government online or
displaying outward signs of wealth is a

-no. On the other hand, praising the
party or giving blood increases your

credit.

Xiaowen Wang is a model citizen.

She lives in Nanjing, a testing ground
for social ranking.

Married with a child, she has a job in a
retirement home, no debts, and she

wouldn't dream of jaywalking.

As a good citizen, I respect the rules
of the road. If I didn't, I'd lose

on my social credit.

In theory, everything can be taken into
account in the social score, even the

most innocuous errands like supermarket
shopping.

When Xiaowen Wang makes an electronic
payment, her purchases tell the state a

lot about her.

Buying cigarettes would count against
her. On the other hand, nappies show

an attentive mother.

Beer could indicate alcoholism. She'd be
better off buying water.

In this pilot city of 8 million people,
there are only 18 ,000 model citizens.

For Xiaowen Wang, there are perks to be
had, such as paying half price for the

bus.

I get discounts for all public services,
even at museums.

And the library is free for me, thanks
to my school.

A good score brings benefits, but people
with low scores lose rights.

The cinema names and shames people
considered untrustworthy, plastering

details, even their addresses, across
big screens.

It's a matter of principle.

Those people have to be condemned.

Those people aren't honest, so they have
to pay the price.

It's only right to pay your debts. You
have to blacklist those that don't.

The Supreme Court has created a
blacklist for so -called bad citizens,

whose ratings have dropped to zero.

On it are companies, but also 23 million
people to date.

Among them is this journalist Liu Hu.

He got a little too close to uncovering
corruption among high -profile party

members. After being sued for defamation
by the subject of a story he'd written,

he was blacklisted.

He only realized when he tried to buy a
train ticket.

and was told he was banned from
traveling.

That tells me I'm still on the
blacklist.

Punished because he's been branded
untrustworthy by the state.

Once you're blacklisted, you can no
longer get a bank loan, start a

buy an apartment, or even send your
children to a private school.

Yu, who is among a tiny minority of
people who have dared to criticize the

system, which some are calling a digital
dictatorship.

I worry because I think many people like
me will be deprived of individual

freedom, and all of us will live with
restrictions of one kind or another.

After our meeting, Liu Hu learned that
his name had been removed from the

blacklist, but he still has a long way
to go. He doesn't want to languish at

bottom of the social credit hierarchy.

So, again, all of these things that are
being done with digital ID and then with

bullying and misinformation, it's all
about behavioral control.

All these psychopaths that we constantly
see, like Larry Ellison, who looks like

he literally, I mean, look at this guy's
face.

I mean, this is leather face in real
life.

I mean, you don't need to go to Texas to
see leather face in the Texas Chainsaw

Massacre. This guy looks like leather
face. All these guys, Larry Ellison,

Fink, all of them constantly.

Palantir, right? All of them talking
about what?

The things that they're doing with
technology are ultimately about being

control how you behave.

Them telling you what's right from wrong
and then you acting accordingly.

So if they tell you that Jesus is bad
and the Bible is wrong and you believe

the Bible, you're going to be punished
for it.

You're going to live the way they tell
you to live because what they're doing

with technology ultimately is about
behavioral control. And that's what the

social media score.

And Credit System brings it. Listen to
it out of these scumbags' mouths

themselves. Citizens will be on their
best behavior because we're constantly

recording and reporting everything
that's going on.

And it's unimpeachable. The cars have
cameras on them.

I think we have a squad car here
someplace.

But those kind of applications using...

AI, if we can use AI, and we're using AI
to monitor the video. By the way, and

the camera's always on. You don't turn
it on and off.

And by the way, the way you turn it on
and off, you can't turn it off. I'm

to the bathroom.

Oracle, I need two minutes to take a
bathroom break, and we'll turn it off.

The truth is, we don't really turn it
off.

What we do is we record it so no one can
see it.

But no one can get into that recording
without a court order. You're going to

have to change. And this is one thing
we're asking companies.

You have to force behaviors.

And at BlackRock, we are forcing
behaviors.

What we're doing internally is if you
don't achieve these levels of impact,

compensation could be impacted. OK, you
have to force behaviors.

And if you don't force behaviors,
whether it's gender or race.

or just any way you want to say the
composition of your team, you're going

impacted. Behaviors are going to have to
change. And this is one thing we're

asking companies.

You have to force behaviors.

And at BlackRock, we are forcing
behaviors.

What we do is we use what legal scholars
call predicate -based research. So we

would look at you.

And then we would go out and say, oh,
there's lots of different things in your

life that may be indicative of someone
involved in bad behavior.

Then we were asked if we were willing to
supply our product.

philanthropically basically for free and
i was very in favor of this because our

primary mission is in fact to set a
global standard for the world for

well we built pg which single -handedly
stopped uh uh the rise of the far right

in in in europe we built foundry which
uh was used to distribute the covid

vaccine and saved millions of lives
globally central question in my view of

civil liberties is how it's not if the
government has data because let's assume

the government has much data as a health
insurance company.

How is that data being used? Is it being
used in a way that's lawful? Meaning,

do they have the right to use it? And is
it being migrated into places it's not

allowed to be used?

We allow the enforcement of rules that
the government ought to enforce. And by

the way, my experience is they want to
enforce or at the very least know they

need to enforce.

And if it's framed in that way, then you
can have what is the ultimate Silicon

Valley. So that's the domino effect.

That's where it starts.

But people's minds don't connect the
dots. They hear a story about social

and they go, yeah, social media is bad.

Yeah, kids shouldn't be on there for
more than an hour a day. When we were

we were outside running around and
playing. Well, why don't you be a parent

not give your kid a phone, not give your
kid a computer, not give your kid an

iPad, have them play sports, have them
interact with people. Oh, because what?

Because the kids see you on your phone
24 -7, right?

So because the kid sees you on your
phone 24 -7, then they want to be on the

phone 24 -7 because that's how it works,
right?

The kids are influenced by the parents,
and the parents throw them into the

school system. And even if the parents
don't get their kid a phone, and they're

like, I'm not going to do that, you're
still putting your kid in the

where they're exposed to life. So what
else are they exposed to?

They're exposed to other kids.

who are getting phones from their
parents and devices, and then they want

And whether you're like, well, I'm still
not going to buy it. Well, they're

going to be on the other kids' devices
or getting influence from these things

finding other ways to get on social
media, et cetera, because they're going

feel like they're not fitting in because
everybody's got Instagram and all this

stuff and taking pictures of themselves.
And this is the new norm. And if you

don't have it, you're weird, right?

That's the upside down that we're living
in right now. And the domino effect

from that.

It has nothing to do with protecting
children from social media. They knew

it was going to be addicting. They
wanted it to be addicting. This was a

into your mind. This was a way into
social grooming and social influence.

But they knew it would lead to a digital
ID because they can get these suckers,

these parents who aren't doing the job
themselves, to say, hey, we need to do

this. My kid's looking at porn. I want
it restricted.

I can't do it myself because I can't be
around 24 -7 because the government's

made it so all the parents have to be at
work 24 -7.

So they could jump on our computer at
home without us being there.

What can we do?

Well, we could give them an ID code,
each kid. That way, everyone have an ID

code when they go online. That way, we
can monitor how much time you're

online. We'll let adults have six to 10
hours and kids under 16, one hour. And

it'll just shut off.

And they'll see a little clock. And
we'll restrict that they can't go on

sites because we have age verification.
And they can't go on these sites.

Everyone will cheer.

That's great. But they could learn
online for a little bit. But they can go

social media for an hour.

And that's about it. They can't go on
porn sites. They can't go on sites I

want them on. Yay, right?

And then they go, okay, well, what about
the adults? Well, he's working with the

kids. He's protecting the kids. The kids
are healthier. What about the adults?

Well, the adults want to be told what to
do, so we'll convince the adults in

other ways. We'll tell them that we've
got Mexicans all over the place and

got immigrants coming in on boats from
Cuba and we've got voter fraud. The

Democrats mail in fake things without
having to prove they're American

We need a digital ID for you. And then
all these suckers who think their vote

actually counts, which, of course, it
doesn't.

Say we do need a digital ID because I'm
getting sick and tired of losing these

elections because the news is telling
me, you know, remember, these are the

people say the news is fake. But all the
stories in the news talk about, you

know, CNN denying election interference.
It has something to do with Democrats

winning. But if Republicans win, then
CNN will promote it and say, oh, the

Republicans cheated and it was election
fraud. Right. All being programmed into

accepting a digital ID, which then leads
to that social credit hell that I

showed you.

Ending anonymity online.

Who's saying what online that's going to
be criminalized? Of course, hate

speech, questioning the synagogue of
Satan in Israel, questioning or saying

anything that might be considered anti
-gay or transphobic. All these things

will have you prosecuted.

Not persecuted, prosecuted. You will be
going to prison longer than a rapist

because of your thoughts.

And they'll end anonymity online.

Then they'll have their whole social
credit system in place. And the people

cheer for it because they've been raised
on video games. They'll love the fact

that you get some little allowances from
the government.

If you behave. So when the government
says, oh, you had two kids. You're only

allowed to have one.

Well, we're going to take that one of
the kids. You can pick which one. We'll

let you pick which kid that we're going
to take out of your household. This is

true in China. You have one kid per
household.

We'll let you pick which one. They go,
okay, we're going to pick this one. All

right. At least they let us pick. They
took the one that we didn't like as much

or whatever.

Whatever psychotic thing they decide to
do.

And then you go along with it. And then
your social credits will go up because

you didn't push back on the government
taking your kid. And you'll be happy.

they'll say, look, you can have a free.

You know, we'll give you a free night at
the Ramada for you and your wife, a

little romantic getaway.

And you'll go, yay, instead of going,
wait a minute, what am I living in? What

kind of upside down?

All through manipulation and mind
control. Being distracted constantly,

paying attention to stuff, falling in
love with technology. And this is how we

get where we are. Not raising your kids
yourself, letting them be raised by the

institution, then having the institution
and big brother parent your kids for

you because you're too distracted being
on your phone. That's the irony of it

all, right?

Kids are on social media, which I
guarantee the parents we see in these

are on their phones longer than the kid.

That's how they're influencing the kids.
So they're not even looking in the

mirror going, oh, yeah, maybe I should
limit it and be a good example for my

kids. No, no.

They want big brother to step in, which
tells you where we're at in society.

We've got government overreach, which is
beyond belief, which after COVID you

would have thought common sense would
have kicked in and people would have

no, no more of this, right?

But now the government's going, oh,
we're going to do this for you, help

kids out. And these people are going,
that's a great idea.

Instead of looking in the mirror going,
maybe I have a problem with social media

and all this stuff. Maybe I'm the
problem. Maybe I need to parent my kids.

they're going, let the government parent
my kids, right?

And then eventually let the government
take your kids out of the household. And

this is how global communism really
spreads. So it all starts with stories

that in New York.

And it really never ends from there
because the domino effect eventually

to the social credit hell system that
they're building out. I thank everybody

for being here. Hope you're all doing
well.

God bless you and your families as
always.