Original subtitles

We're fortunate to have with us one of the most important voices of the growing

worldwide effort to learn the truth about the events of 9 -11.

Among her other contributions, Barbara Honiger is the visionary artist behind

both the Boston Tea Party for 9 -11 Truth and the third beam, which

symbolized Building 7, that she organized in New York City on the ninth

anniversary of 9 -11.

And that has become the icon for architects and engineers for 9 -11

well as the 9 -11 Truth movement worldwide.

Barbara is also a national whistleblower. She served as White House

analyst and special assistant for domestic policy in the Reagan -Bush

administration, where she was the first to resign as a matter of conscience.

She then wrote her groundbreaking book, October Surprise, revealing the Iran

part of the Iran -Contra scandal.

Her book led to a full -scale subpoena -powered investigation as well as a

story in Newsweek magazine.

Barbara then worked from 2000 to 2011 as senior military affairs journalist at

the Naval Postgraduate School.

the premier science, technology, and national affairs graduate research

university of the Department of Defense.

In this position, she had access to the highest level civilian and military

officials of the Bush -Cheney administration, helping her to get the

of the 9 -11 Pentagon attack.

She published her findings in the Pentagon attack papers, which was

in Jim Maher's best -selling book on 9 -11 called The Terror Conspiracy.

Professor David Ray Griffin has said of her findings that they would change the

discussion of what happened on 9 -11.

Ms. Honaker has also done pioneering investigative work on the war games

exercises taking place on 9 -11, as well as the anthrax attacks.

She's one of the founding members of Patriots Question 9 -11 and a charter

member of Political Leaders for 9 -11 Truth.

Currently, she's completing a book on the Pentagon attack.

Please welcome Barbara Hunniger.

Thank you so much for coming out.

It's a really great turnout. I'm pleased.

It's wonderful to be in Seattle. I've never been in Seattle before. I actually

saw Mount Rainier with hardly a cloud on it yesterday.

And I was told that I would never be able to see Mount Rainier without a

so I considered that a good sign for tonight.

The title of my talk is Behind the Smoke Curtain, which I believe will also be

the title of my book, which I hope will be out this coming March, in a couple of

months. And I'm going to self -publish it, and it will be available on Amazon

.com. The alternative title for my talk is, Or Everything You Think You

Probably Know About the Pentagon Attack is Wrong.

And that would be even for people who have been members of the 9 -11 Truth

Movement for quite a while. I would be interested to know...

Show of hands if you're not too shy.

How many people have already investigated 9 -11 or consider

-11 truth people?

Oh, about a third of the audience. That's wonderful.

So what that means is two -thirds of the audience is here to be informed, and

that's also wonderful. I congratulate you.

The reason I have this slide up.

It's because for those of you who are members of the 9 -11 Truth Movement and

already believe you know about the Pentagon attack, I wanted to put these

two slides up so that you understand that even though what you're about to

is not what you think happened at the Pentagon, this presentation, the

information in it, has already been seen and reviewed by the world leaders of

the 9 -11 Truth Movement who have these rather phenomenal feedback.

about this presentation.

So the bottom line is it's safe to open your mind about what you're about to

hear.

And here's some more amazing work, truly historic.

So, what happened at the Pentagon and didn't and why it matters so terribly

for our future.

One year before 9 -11, on September 11th, the year 2000,

The neocon organization that called themselves Project for a New American

Century, or you may have heard the acronym PNAC or PNAC, actually called

in one of their publications for a new Pearl Harbor.

This famous quote is from the Project for a New American Century manifesto

page 51.

Quote, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change,

is likely to be a long one.

absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor,

unquote. As the Project for a New American Century manifesto was being

published, this offer was made to producer Aaron Russo a full year before

9 -11.

In September of 2000, Nicholas Rockefeller, of the Rockefeller family

the Twin Towers, told Russo, Quote, there's going to be an event, and out of

that event we're going to invade Afghanistan.

So we can run pipelines through the Caspian Sea, so we can go into Iraq, so

can take the oil, so we can establish bases in the Middle East to make the

Middle East part of the New World Order.

And then he says, in my relationships with some of these people, the

Rockefellers, the Council on Foreign Relations, et cetera, in my

with some of these people, I can tell you that is as evil as it gets.

That's Aaron Rousseau.

If he joined them, Russo was told, he would, quote, be spared the police state

measures, the domestic surveillance state measures, that would be imposed on

rest of the American public. That means you, after, quote, the event, unquote,

happened. This is a year before 9 -11.

And you can see this statement by Aaron Russo on a video on the

net.

The Project for New American Century neocons prepared the ground for 9 -11 so

would be seen as a surprise attack, which it wasn't, and for the chorus of

Harbor, Pearl Harbor, New Pearl Harbor on September 11th.

In the months leading up to the 9 -11 attack, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld

out literally hundreds, if not thousands, of copies of Neocon Roberta

Wohlstetter's 1962 book on Pearl Harbor, a book which pushed the

false surprise attack and intelligence failures official line of the original

Pearl Harbor attack.

She was the wife of Neocon godfather, who was Deputy Secretary of Defense Wolf

of its personal mentor.

Richard Pearl's father -in -law, and Zionist passionate war hawk Albert

Wohlstetter.

The movie Pearl Harbor hit theaters in late May of 2001 using real Navy

ships that were arranged with the Navy by the Navy's man in Hollywood who was

deck to assure so -called historical accuracy and pyrotechnic special

an attack on an iconic national military facility, however, could give them

their new Pearl Harbor. Just think about it.

Even though on 9 -11 the World Trade Center attacks were more spectacular,

sure, and they were the first attacks, the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2,

they would have been likely seen, in my opinion, as just a very much

bigger World Trade Center 93.

or a much bigger Oklahoma City.

But both of those attacks had already been handled by the civilian courts.

And these people did not want the 9 -11 attack to be viewed as a bigger Oklahoma

City or a bigger World Trade Center 93.

They wanted them to be viewed as a new Pearl Harbor, which required an attack

something like the iconic military facility at Pearl Harbor. And that

military facility was the Pentagon.

Only the Pentagon attack made 9 -11 into the new Pearl Harbor

that the authors of the PNAC manifesto wanted and needed to roll out their

global domination agenda.

They needed it to claim justification for endless preemptive wars, which we

still in, over 11 years later, for their global domination agenda.

and most people don't know, .3, for the creation shortly after 9 -11 of the

first U .S. mainland combatant command.

It's called NORTHCOM.

And what that means is, if you recall, that the Bush -Cheney administration

much wanted and said that the entire world, meaning including the mainland

United States, your homeland, was now part of the global battlefield.

And in order to make it literally a battlefield, they had to, for the first

time, create a combatant command over mainland United States called NORTHCOM.

It also enabled the New Pearl Harbor attack on the Pentagon, in addition, of

course, to the other attacks of 9 -11, but it was the key one is what I'm

arguing, enabled the Bush -Cheney administration to bypass.

On 9 -11 and before 9 -11, there was joint authority.

Over NORAD's response, over the jets that were so late in responding

to all of the attacks on 9 -11, took an hour and 15 minutes, which was absurd.

On and before 9 -11, the decisions as to NORAD responses were actually the joint

authority of the U .S. President and the Canadian Prime Minister.

So once NORTHCOM was created, they separated out the decision -making, the

unilateral decision -making authority of the U .S. president over those kinds of

responses.

Also, of course, the 9 -11, and in particular, the Pentagon made it into

Pearl Harbor, justified, they claimed, their domestic surveillance state that

are still within.

And they enabled Bush Jr., President Bush Jr., George W. Bush, to continually

evoke Article 2 of the Constitution, his so -called commander -in -chief powers,

which he did and members of his administration did over and over

justify violation of our Bill of Rights, of U .S. federal law, of international

law, and even Nuremberg Principles. Bush even said that it was the Pentagon

attack that made it war in his mind. And a new Pearl Harbor.

In his memoir, which has been published, his book, and in his speeches after his

memoir was published, he said that it was after the World Trade Center 1 hit,

thought it was due to it just being a terrible pilot, that it was an accident.

He said in print that when he was told of the second hit, presumably we are

when Andrew Card whispered in his ear, America is under attack, even then he

didn't think we were at war, not per se.

He said in his memoirs and his speeches after his memoirs were published that it

was with the Pentagon attack that he knew we were at war.

And you had to be able to sell to the American public in the world that we

at war in order to justify all these horrendous actions in the name of the 9

line.

Bush wrote in his diary on September 11th, quote, the Pearl Harbor of the

century took place today.

Because the Pentagon attack had, therefore, to succeed, to affect us

war, to affect the new Pearl Harbor, and to get their global domination agenda

and surveillance state, they couldn't rely upon mere hijackers, no matter who

they were, even if there were any. They had to control the operation.

And in order to control it, they had to execute it, and only...

pre -placed explosives, both at the World Trade Center, as David Ray Griffin

Richard Gage and Niels Heret and Professor Stephen Jones and many others

proven is the real story at the World Trade Center, both World Trade Center's

Towers 1 and 2, with planes, plane approaches and impacts as the mere cover

cause, so that it was apparent that the buildings would, it would be apparent

that the buildings came down.

to the uninitiated because of the planes that impacts and the fires, the same as

you will see from this presentation is true at the Pentagon, that the real

at the Pentagon is pre -placed inside the building explosives with a plain

approach and destruction as the cover cause.

To get their new Pearl Harbor, the Project for New American Century neocon

signatories, In order to be certain that they had it, they had to steal the 2000

election. And they did that in Florida where Bush's brother was governor, Jeb

Bush. A project for New American Century signatory.

Bush v. Gore was argued by none other than Ted Olson, whose wife Barbara's, we

now know, non -existent alleged cell phone calls from the alleged Pentagon

Flight 77 were the source, the most important source for the claim that the

alleged Pentagon plane hijacker story, that there were hijackers on that plane.

And without that story, there is zero evidence that Flight 77 even returned

east. even if it was Flight 77, as you'll see, that left Dulles Airport to

with. And the entire official story of the Pentagon attack falls apart.

And in case you question that the cell phone calls of Barbara Olson from Flight

77 have been deemed nonexistent, that is now the official position of the FBI in

the Massawi trial of the Pentagon and of American Airlines.

It's per David Ray Griffin.

Bush planned on being a, quote, war president, unquote, before he even ran

the office of president. He said so.

With Bush's election, the Project for New American Century signatories then

became the U .S. government. You will see that in the next slide, which I will

not be able to read because it goes on and on in fine print forever, of all the

PNAC signatories and participants.

There were two levels, signatories and participants.

who actually became the United States government.

Once in power, however, only the Pentagon attack guaranteed Bush and the

for a New American Century signatory and participants, Bush becoming a war

president, and they're getting their new Pearl Harbor to roll out their global

domination and domestic surveillance state agenda.

Now, these are just, if you could read this, and this will be in my book, all

this. But following the theft of the 2000 election, and by the way, Bush v.

was decided by the Supreme Court completely unconstitutionally, because

Constitution makes explicitly clear that in the case of a contested presidential

election, that the House of Representatives makes the decision, not

Court.

So following this after the 2000 election, the Project for New American

Manifesto signatories and participants literally became the U .S. government

uniquely with the motive, means, opportunity, and access to affect their

Pearl Harbor in the attacks of 9 -11. And what you could barely see here are

name after name after name of the individuals who were PNAC manifesto

signatories and participants.

and they're absolutely top positions in the federal government once the election

was stolen.

Only the Pentagon attack enabled We Are at War, which you notice this is from

immediately after 9 -11.

This is the National Security Agency NSA General Zahner, who was head

of their Signals Intelligence Directorate.

They apparently expected something to happen because they whipped out this we

are at war immediately after the attacks.

Zahner was in charge of the NSA unit that surveilled calls to and from, and I

put al -Qaeda in quotes, al -Qaeda's global communications center in Yemen

minimum of a year and a half before 9 -11.

They knew exactly what was coming down.

The new Pearl Harbor and war memes were pushed by the mainstream media as the

attacks were literally in progress, before either of the towers fell in New

and they were smoking.

This is just one example, but there are dozens.

As the attacks were unfolding, the BBC in London began playing clips from Pearl

Harbor. Tom Brokaw of NBC Today Show, as the attacks were unfolding in New York,

said, there's been a declaration of war by terrorists.

This is the most serious attack on the U .S. since Pearl Harbor.

Time magazine, in its special September 2001 9 -11 issue, said, quote, what's

needed in response to 9 -11 is a unified, unifying Pearl Harbor sort of

purple American fury, a ruthless indignation that doesn't leak away in

week or two, unquote.

Pearl Harbor was mentioned, mentioned, war was mentioned, mentioned by the

mainstream media.

9 -11 was clearly designed using the original Pearl Harbor attacks as its

template.

So what did the new Pearl Harbor insider script require the appearance of in the

actual execution of the attacks of 9 -11?

They had to appear to be surprise attacks.

They had to appear to be kamikaze pilot attacks.

With planes this time used as weapons on buildings instead of ships.

Both the original Pearl Harbor and 9 -11 attacks were in the morning.

There needed to be a critical mass of innocent deaths.

The next slide after this one is truly chilling.

Condoleezza Rice, the National Security Advisor, and Bush both said immediately

after the attacks, they just couldn't imagine planes having ever been used as

weapons in a kamikaze -like attack.

Well, she isn't a historian.

And a kamikaze attack triggered U .S. participation in World War II.

It is, I simply can't imagine, that Condoleezza Rice couldn't imagine.

And Condoleezza Rice and Philip Zelikow, who became the executive director of

the 9 -1 -1 Commission cover -up inquiry, and I put inquiry in quotes,

members of Bush Sr.'s A -team when he was president.

They had co -published a book.

They served on, as I mentioned, Bush Senior's National Security Council

together, and Zelikow became her top aide plenipotentiary at the State

Department when she moved to the State Department.

And Zelikow, not surprisingly, in his own bio, states that he is an expert on

creating public myths, you can read that as lies, and maintaining public

presumptions about those lies, and called that cover -ups.

He, Zelikow...

was effectively the sole author of the 9 -11 Commission report.

He wrote its detailed outline before this so -called investigation even

and Zelikow authored the Bush Doctrine for Unilateral Preemptive War under

Condoleezza Rice at the State Department.

I also interviewed Richard Clark, who was the so -called counterterrorism czar

in the Bush Jr.

Cheney White House. I interviewed him when I was at the Naval Postgraduate

School, and he told me in an article that was actually, I published it on a

website online, that, quote, the White House approved all major exercise

scenarios in advance.

Now, the White House can only mean the National Security Council.

and or Vice President Cheney. And the National Security Council was headed by

Condoleezza Rice, and the counterterrorism czar was Mr.

Clark himself.

So what does that mean?

I was the original researcher who uncovered the reality of and the

the modus operandi for the planning, execution, and cover -up of the real

perpetrator attack of 9 -11, that at the center of that were...

military exercises that were taking place on the morning of 9 -11 itself

were on hijack scenarios.

So what we're saying here is that Richard Clark himself, the White House

counterterrorism czar before and on 9 -11, told me personally, and I have

published it on a DOD website, that he and Condoleezza Rice knew of and pre

-approved the hijack scenario exercises taking place before and on.

9 -11.

To succeed the real inside job 9 -11 PSYOP required a critical mass of

deaths. Believe it or not, after the World Trade Center attack in 1993 that

killed, I believe, five people and injured about a thousand, federal agents

heard to say by reporter Stephen Emerson that, quote, there had not been enough

deaths this time.

After the 1993 World Trade Center attacks also, most people don't know

the World Trade Center towers' roof doors were locked, ordered locked, by

official New York City policy, so that on 9 -11 it happened, because of that,

that the innocent victims above the impact zones were trapped, terrorized,

killed.

They had no way to escape except to jump.

And even the New York Times published that I believe 105 victims had gotten

right up to the door, where in 1993 they did, they were able to go onto the

roof, but they were blocked.

Also, after the impacts and before the towers fell, dozens of military and

civilian helicopters, self -dispatched, wonderful people from the military,

started flying towards New York City.

intending to rescue survivors from the towers to risk their lives and their

helicopters. They were ordered to go to a nearby military base so that they

could not respond.

On 9 -11, two World Trade Center tower attacks 15 minutes apart, of course,

ensured the maximum PSYOP, ensured this maximum live audience for the second

World Trade Center hit and the towers collapsed.

After the 9 -11 attacks, Paul Wolfowitz, who was a top signatory and participant

in the Project for a New American Century manifesto, published exactly a

before 9 -11, and was Deputy Secretary of Defense on 9 -11, immediately under

Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, he actually had this to say about the

mass of death in the 9 -11 attacks.

This is after 9 -11 now. He predicted before the final numbers were in that

9 -11 attacks would soon be found to have resulted in a, quote, greater

of American deaths than any single day in U .S. history since the Civil War,

more than any single day in World War I and World War II.

and that Americans would now be willing to sacrifice their lives in great

numbers for the cause of defeating terrorism, the so -called global war on

terrorism. And quoted Winston Churchill, quote, America is like a great boiler.

Once it gets fired up, the energy it generates is enormous.

This was then echoed by Newsweek magazine immediately after, quote, more

were killed by the alleged suicide hijackers last week.

then the number of American soldiers killed in the entire American Revolution

at Antietam, the bloodiest one -day battle of the Civil War, or at Pearl

or on D -Day.

And locking the roof doors ensured that.

Zbigniew Brzezinski stated the number killed on 9 -11 for added effect.

Quote,

it, meaning 9 -11, is more murderous even than Pearl Harbor.

and the psychological impact is the same, unquote.

But none of any of this would have succeeded without the Pentagon attack.

So, proving its official story a lie, as Richard Gage and

David Ray Griffin and so many others have proven for the World Trade Center

attacks, to prove that the Pentagon attack official story is a lie is so

extremely important.

So what is the evidence that a 757, which Flight 77, according to the

story, was, did not hit the Pentagon at the alleged impact point, which was in

Wedge 1, and I will show you a diagram of the Pentagon in a moment to show you

exactly what the official story claims.

and did not hit at what the official story says was the alleged impact time

Flight 77, which according to the official story was 937 and 46 seconds.

almost 938.

When we prove this, we prove that the official Pentagon story is a lie.

First, so what didn't happen at the Pentagon?

We're going to go over this very quickly because the meat of my presentation is

what I've discovered did happen there.

So first, what didn't happen at the Pentagon? Well, what didn't happen at

Pentagon is what the government says happened, is what the 9 -11 Commission

report says happened, which Professor Griffin has called a 571 -page lie,

it is.

And the official story at the Pentagon says that Flight 77, a large 757

Airlines Boeing airliner, hit the Pentagon at column 14, which

you see in this slide.

photo. And this is actually a photo that was published on the Pentagon's own

website. You see their logo up at the left. Immediately after 9 -11 at either

the first or the second press conference held in the Pentagon itself right after

the attacks.

So the official story, which they were able to spin out that quickly, is

graphically shown with the overlay of this alleged plane here that impacted on

Wedge 1 in Wedge 1 on the west face or west side of the Pentagon.

Now, this is a diagram of the Pentagon that shows the rings and the wedges.

Now, at the bottom of the graphic, it's a little bit cut off, but

there's a, looks like a fireball, a little graphic of a fireball. That's the

alleged impact point.

And if you notice, it is to the right or south of the midline.

The Wedge 1 that had been upgraded to withstand a terrorist attack, to

either a truck bomb or a bomb at the wall or a high -force lateral impact of

a plane, specifically upgraded to withstand the kind of terrorist attack

the official story says happened at the Pentagon on 9 -11.

It's only in wedge one. And wedge one, most people think wedge one is the whole

west side. That is not correct.

Wedge one goes from that center line at the bottom of the graphic around that

right -hand corner at the bottom and up to the center line of the next side to

the right.

So from going back to the bottom of the graphic, from the center line to the

left, it's wedge two.

So Wedge 2 was going to start the upgrading process the day after 9 -11 or

most two days after 9 -11. In fact, the day after 9 -11, the Pentagon had

preannounced that they were going to declare that the upgrade to withstand a

terrorist attack, a plane impact, or a bomb on the outside of Wedge 1, which

includes the official story alleged impact point of Flight 77, was complete,

that they were then going to start upgrading Wedge 2.

Most people don't know this, but the Pentagon both had and has its own

And the reason is that the President and the Secretary of Defense and VIPs like

to helicopter in and out of the Pentagon.

They don't like to go into Reagan Airport or one of the civilian airports

then drive to the Pentagon. They like to go straight to the Pentagon. So the

Pentagon has its own heliport. And that heliport on 9 -11, this is actually an

aerial photograph before 9 -11,

this square structure out on the lawn, and that's the west face.

Now, if you notice, to the left, which is to the north of the heliport,

There's that little structure with a smaller structure on top of it, and

the Heliport firehouse with the Heliport air traffic controller where he sat on

top of the roof in that smaller structure on top of the roof of the

And that structure is going to become, and the Heliport itself, is going to

become extremely important when we see what did happen at the Pentagon versus

what the official story claims happened at the Pentagon. The official story

actually states that a plane came in.

at an approximate 45 -degree angle, and that its wing hit here, and that it went

in basically here into the building versus, as you'll see, because from

to window, it's 10 feet, according to the Pentagon Building Performance

So it's approximately, count the windows, at least 100 feet between the

story says the plane allegedly impacted and where, as we're going to see, there

actually was a plane that was destroyed at the Pentagon.

which was considerably to the left or the north of where the official story

claims it happened.

So this is a graphic of a Boeing 757 alleged impact per the official story.

And you can see how absurd it is. Wing tip to wing tip, 124 feet.

And as I mentioned, the window center to window center on the Pentagon is 10

feet. So it's easy to know the distance when you look at these images by just

counting the number of windows and multiplying by 10 feet.

This is a properly scaled and positioned Boeing 757,

actually positioned in, of course, it's an overlay, but it's positioned the

way the official story claims that Flight 77 came in, which shows the

and total absurdity of it.

As you'll see, it would be impossible for the official story to be true

the Pentagon Building Performance Report states that 90 % to 95 % of the

internal damage, which was alleged by the official story to be from the plane

somehow getting through the wall, and we will address that in a moment. That

couldn't have happened either.

But if it got through the wall and it went in and created what they called the

internal penetration path of damage, that that damage was 90 % to 95 % on the

ground floor.

Well, the ground floor is 12 feet high.

And they said that 5 % to 10 % max was on the second floor.

Well, it's impossible.

And this is why it's impossible.

First off, the 757's massive six -ton steel and titanium alloy engines extend

nine feet beneath its wings.

It would have gouged the lawn if it came in anything like at the height of the

official story.

And there it is again to show you these huge engines way down beneath the bottom

of the plane.

So based on the interior damage, which was 90 % to 95 % on the ground floor,

Pentagon's own building performance report found that, quote, the top of the

fuselage, or body of the plane, was no more than 20 feet above the ground. No

more. But a 757's body is almost 12 1⁄2 feet in diameter, leaving less than 8

feet between the bottom of the ground.

And yet the engines themselves extend 9 feet below. The official story is

physically impossible.

And, of course, it didn't happen. If the official story were true, those huge

engines would have gouged the lawn like this. And it's very important that the

official story claims that the plane came in effectively level, not at an

which would have avoided this.

Instead, the lawn outside the official story alleged impact point, and this is

very famous photograph that almost everyone in the 9 -11 truth movement has

wrongly, used as evidence that no plane was destroyed at the Pentagon.

This is outside the official story alleged impact point to the right or

that midline of the West Wall.

And there is no gouge on the lawn, and it's pristine, and there's no airplane

debris. And for this reason, many people in the 9 -11 Truth Movement use this

photograph and others like it.

to allegedly prove that there was no plane that was destroyed at the

but that's not correct.

However, as you'll now see, there is wreckage and a huge amount of it just

further to the left or north at and around the Heliport, which you've now

outside the wall's center point and to the north or left of that outside of

Wedge 2, which wasn't yet upgraded.

So this is just to remind you again that you're going to see the damage that I'm

about to show you the photographs of is just to the right of that little

firehouse building with the Heliport Air Traffic Control's

lookout above it. That's what you're about to see.

That's just one example. The lawn off Wedge 2 is anything but pristine.

The Pentagon firehouse in this photograph, you can see the top of the

just beyond that fire engine, and that's that firehouse that you saw in the

previous photograph.

Two Heliport firefighters who were on duty in that little firehouse that

of 9 -11 because, most people don't know this, President Bush, before the

attacks, was pre -scheduled to arrive by helicopter at the Pentagon Heliport

around noon, between noon and 1230.

So they were getting ready for that, and he had just before what I'm about to

show you happened, the firefighter, Alan Wallace, had backed that fire truck out

of the firehouse and parked it with its back to the wall, perpendicular to the

wall. All of this is to the left or the north of the line

demarcating Wedge 1 to Wedge 2.

It was considerably north, between 120 and 150 feet north of where the official

story says Flight 77, as you will see, didn't even come close to the building

for another 5 minutes and 16 seconds, as we'll see.

And here we're getting into the proof of the timing.

On the left in this photograph is the clock from that Healyport firehouse.

It was stopped by some violent event at 9 .32 and 30 seconds.

And guess what? That clock has been preserved, stopped, at that very time in

Smithsonian Institution's official 9 -11 exhibit, which you see here.

The clock is on the flat table. It's the third object from the left, just to

the left of Ted Olson's phone, in which he allegedly received calls from his

wife, Barbara, from the Pentagon plane, which...

The Pentagon, the FBI, and American Airlines all say that it's a lie that

phone was ever used to talk to his wife.

So the burning question before us, and this was the question I asked myself

this past year, what violent event, because it had to be a violent event of

kind, at or near the Heliport, where Heliport's firefighter, Ellen Wallace,

just backed.

one of the Heliport fire trucks out in preparation for President Bush's

arrival. What was it that stopped the Heliport firehouse clock at 9 .32 and 30

seconds? Especially when the official story claims that Flight 77 was miles

miles still outside of Washington, D .C., and wouldn't even approach the

building for 5 minutes and 16 more seconds at almost 9 .38, technically at

and 46 seconds. What stopped the Heliport clock?

Multiple witnesses state that at 9 .32 and 30 seconds, now they don't give the

time. You infer that from the combination of the converging evidence

witnesses' testimony that I'm giving you now and the stop clock at the Heliport.

Multiple witnesses, including those two firefighters from the Heliport firehouse

itself, state that a white, low -flying plane.

And if it's a white plane, it cannot be any American airline, civilian airliner,

which are polished aluminum, so they're silvery. They're definitely not seen as

white. But all these witnesses were very clear that it was a white, low -flying

plane approached the Pentagon on a south path.

In other words, south of that center line, to the right of that center line,

coming in at a diagonal, a south of Navy Annex path.

And hit, dragged, or scraped, as you'll see they use those different words, but

for the same event, hit, dragged, scraped its left wing at or near the

just before bursting into an immense fireball.

And as I mentioned, as American Airlines bodies are polished silvery aluminum,

this plane simply could not have been Flight 77, an American Airlines polished

aluminum body.

Witness Jim Sutherland saw a white twin -engine plane with multicolored

horizontal stripes flying an estimated 50 feet, he believed, above I -395 in an

almost straight -line approach towards the building on the south path.

Pentagon Heliport firefighters, as we've already seen, their names are Alan

Wallace and Mark Skipper, are direct witnesses to a white plane approaching

heliport and exploding into a massive fireball.

near the firehouse, which would have killed them had they not noticed it at

last second and literally run. One of them, Alan Wallace, ran away.

As he saw it coming in, he saw it maybe 200 and 250 feet from him, which is

difficult to estimate because it was coming right at him, to his left. As he

walked with his back out from behind by that fire truck, he was very clear that

he looked to his left, which was to the south.

And it was coming right at him at that diagonal angle.

And it would have killed him had he not immediately run out of the way to save

his life and rolled under a van.

You'll see that van in a moment. It was parked outside the wall of the Heliport

Firehouse. And Mark Skipper, the other firefighter, ran out onto the lawn to

north or to the left and literally leapt away. And they did survive. They were

burned, but they survived.

I believe, though this is an inference, he did state explicitly that he believed

Alan Wallace that the plane, which was coming in at an angle so he saw the

side of the plane on his left, that there was two stripes down the side. He

thought they were orange and blue, but they were almost certainly orange, red,

or red and blue in order to simulate an American Airlines airliner.

To avoid being hit by this white plane, Heliport firefighter Alan Wallace ran

toward the outer wall of the Heliport and leapt for cover under a van.

And this is his published testimony.

After coming out, immediately after, he said, quote, everything is on fire. The

grass is on fire. The building is on fire. The firehouse is on fire. There

fire everywhere.

Areas of the blacktop, meaning the helipad, were on fire. There was debris

everywhere. The trees were on fire.

The back end of the fire truck that he and Mark Skipper had just parked facing

away from the Pentagon wall was also in flames.

Inside the firehouse, the ceiling had crumbled, temporarily trapping the third

firefighter, Dennis Young, and was filled also with debris.

The official Pentagon report called...

Pentagon 9 -11 actually states that the fireball may have even gone into the

still -open firehouse door, out of which Wallace had just backed out the

firetruck or moved the firetruck out.

Multiple witnesses saw the planes, this white plane's left wing, hit, scrape, or

drag on the helipad just before it burst into a fireball.

These are just some of the testimonies. Quote, the left wing of the plane

touched the ground by the helicopter pad.

The left wing dipped and scraped the helicopter area. The left wing touched

helipad. These are all separate witnesses.

The plane dragged its left wing along the ground.

It looked like it hit the helicopter pad, then skipped up. The plane caught

edge of its left wing on the ground.

There is a helicopter pad right in front of the side of the Pentagon.

The left wing touched there.

After the fireball, there was...

suddenly what one witness called literally millions of small pieces of

which I think that the evidence shows is this wreckage of this plane, pieces at

and around the Pentagon heliport. Now, this is anything but a pristine lawn.

This is also well to the north, between 120 and 150 feet north or to the left of

the alleged impact point of Flight 77, further south.

The debris, according to witnesses, also rained onto I -27, which is to the

right, perpendicular to the wall, out, with some even, according to witnesses,

falling on the north side of the Pentagon and on the Fort Myer walking

This is completely different from the official account.

One of the witnesses, Penny Eggless, claimed that she also saw a white, she

very certain, white, low -flying, south -approaching plane, the above piece from

which she said actually fell through her car's sunroof.

The inside surface of this piece of evidence is dark red, which is nothing

all like the light green on the inner surface of the body of civilian

like American Airlines 757s. It looks like a kind of graphite material, which

may actually be similar or identical to the material used to stealth military

planes.

Former NSA, National Security Agency, and Military Electronics, expert Dennis

Cimino has told me that he believes this piece is from the wing or stabilizer of

a fiberglass drone that was shaped and painted to simulate an American

Airlines plane, and that the fiberglass would shatter upon impact into these

many, many, many pieces that you actually see.

Here's another photograph, firemen walking off the edge of the helipad

the Pentagon Wall.

Some of the witnesses actually referred to this debris wreckage as like

confetti. There were some large pieces, however.

Workers walking over the wreckage between the helipad and the Pentagon

closer you get to the wall, the more of this wreckage debris there is.

This is a very important photograph.

It's looking south towards the earrings collapse zone. So you can see where the

wall has collapsed over the alleged impact point of Flight 77, much further

south.

And the Pentagon firehouse is then to the left off the edge of the photo. So

you're looking at something in the middle now between the firehouse on the

and the alleged impact point of Flight 77 on the right.

Not too difficult to see where the pristine lawn begins.

So the pristine lawn you saw in that earlier photograph that members of the 9

-11 Truth Movement have been for 10 years or more citing as proof that there

no plain destruction at the Pentagon is way off to the south.

And all of this destruction that they don't show you for whatever reason,

inadvertent or otherwise, is further north.

And here's more confetti -like wreckage in the distance beyond this large piece.

There are some large pieces, which itself is right next to the helipad.

And this is incredible.

When I discovered this this past year, it was quite a shock.

There was not just a white plank that came in on a south pass, a diagonal

pass, at 9 .32 and 30 seconds.

was destroyed there in some way without, I believe, hitting the wall because

there is no evidence that it actually hit the wall. It was somehow destroyed.

And we're about to see how I believe it was destroyed without hitting the wall a

split second later.

There was not just a white plane there.

At the helipad, there was also a helicopter, a military helicopter at the

helipad. It had arrived at the helipad four minutes and 42 seconds just before

this white plane flew in and exploded in a fireball.

And this is amazing.

Lifted off only three seconds before the white plane exploded exactly there.

And how do we know that? We know that from this record.

This is the record from the Reagan National Airport for the MC, and that, I

believe, stands for a Marine Corps MC helicopter at the Pentagon heliport,

showing its arrival, and because this was by radar from Reagan Airport, the

arrival meant it had descended below the radar floor, which was about 100 feet,

and that was at 927 in 51 seconds, and it then returned above 100 feet to radar

visibility,

at 9 .32 and 33 seconds. And we saw that the Pentagon clock, the Pentagon

heliport clock, firehouse clock, was stopped only three seconds before that,

9 .32 and 30 seconds.

So I believe, although it is an inference, that that helicopter somehow

destroyed that plane.

As we will see in more detail at the end of this presentation, where we get into

the evidence for who... planned and oversaw the real insider plot of 9 -11,

not believe it is a mere coincidence that the defense contractor company of

Pentagon's own chief financial officer on 9 -11, Dov Zakheim, was the

manufacturer of a special proprietary system for remote -controlling drone

aircraft and for destroying drones that were used in military exercises at the

terminal phase of those exercises.

The near simultaneity of the helicopter liftoff, within seconds, literally, it

had to take a few seconds to get up so that it would avoid being hit by the

plane itself, and then could have destroyed the plane by a missile. Or by

onboard system like that designed by Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zakhin's

for destroying military exercise drones in their terminal phase.

That is, in this case, just before the drone at the Pentagon on 9 -11 would

otherwise hit the wall.

That's speculation, but the plane was then destroyed.

But it is more than telling that System Planning Corporation, or SPC, designs,

manufactures, and distributes highly sophisticated technology that enables an

operator to fly by remote control as many as eight different airborne

at the same time from one position either on the ground or airborne.

System Planning Corporation markets the technology to take over the controls of

an airborne vehicle already in flight.

For example, the flight termination system technology could hijack hijackers

bring the plane down safely.

The flight termination system can be used in conjunction with the CTS

that can control up to eight airborne vehicles simultaneously.

The possibility of nefarious use of these brilliant technologies...

developed and deployed by Systems Planning Corporation, certainly deserves

careful consideration in any full and impartial investigation of what actually

took place on 9 -11.

And the helicopter then did lift off. It was not destroyed.

In fact, naval historian John Sherwood told Pentagon eyewitness Jeffrey Mark

Parsons, an extremely important Pentagon witness, that a helicopter had been

sent to the Pentagon, quote, by the White House itself.

which would almost certainly, if true, mean that it was sent by either Vice

President Cheney or the Secret Service.

Quote, this is still from the naval historian John Sherwood, quote, to

the plane from going into the Pentagon.

Well, if he was referring to that white plane that exploded into a fireball at 9

.32 and 30 seconds, stopping the Pentagon heliport clock.

At 9 .32 and 30 seconds, then it certainly was prevented from going into

Pentagon because there is no evidence that it hit the wall just beyond the

heliport.

Witness Jeffrey Parsons himself.

From the 17th floor of his hotel, which was across I -395, he saw a helicopter

flying erratically between his hotel and the helipad, going back and forth like

a bumblebee.

And then it disappeared from his perspective below the Pentagon roof.

where he says it would have landed at the helipad. And then he said only a few

minutes later, he first left the window.

After he had left the window and seen this erratic helicopter, he then heard a

massive explosion, went back to the window, saw this big fireball, but he

actually see an impact, but he saw the fireball and smoke afterwards.

He himself was a helicopter pilot with the U .S. Border Patrol, so he knows.

What's unusual for a helicopter to be doing? And he says that was extremely

unusual, and he didn't understand what it was doing.

Air Force witness to CNN's Chris Plant.

Quote, I was told by one witness, Plant said, this is on air, live that morning

from the Pentagon, an Air Force senior enlisted man that he was outside the

Pentagon when it occurred.

He said that he saw a helicopter circling the building, the Pentagon.

He said it appeared to be a U .S. military.

I believe that is the MC or Marine Corps helicopter that we saw the radar record

from. And that that helicopter disappeared behind the building where

helicopter landing zone, meaning the Heliport, is.

And then the witness saw a fireball go into the sky, exactly like the Heliport

firefighters say.

This helicopter disappeared behind the building, and then there was an

explosion.

The near simultaneity of the liftoff of the helicopter and the explosion

explains why this witness and many others, whose vantage points only

them to see the helicopter and not also the plane come in, like the Heliport

firefighters, led to erroneous early reports that the Pentagon had actually

attacked by a helicopter.

In fact, Vice President Cheney said that himself to Reuters.

And all this happened at 9 .32 and 30 seconds.

which is more than five minutes, five minutes and 16 seconds before the

story says Flight 77 was anywhere close to Washington, D .C.

So for those of you who are 9 -11 truth aficionados, I'm going to answer this

question I'm always asked. Well, what about the Citizens Investigation Team or

SIT, Northside Witnesses? I honor those witnesses.

I, however, do not believe that the interpretation of what the witnesses

the citizens' investigation team is correct. I think it is very incorrect.

Why?

As there is no evidence of any plane destruction other than the white plane

exploded near the heliport at 9 .32 and 30 seconds, if the plane that a dozen or

so witnesses saw approach to the north of the center line, to the north of the

Citgo gas station, which is on that center line, and to the north of the

annex, which is on that center line, if that plane flew over, which many 9 -11

researchers believe, falsely believe, it cannot be the White Plane, which was

destroyed. It didn't fly over the building. It was destroyed if it was the

Plane.

So it would have to have been either a different second plane or...

The white plane could have come around twice.

As these Northside witnesses, who were interviewed by the citizens'

investigation team, however, themselves did not believe that plane that they saw

flew over. They believed it did hit because they heard this huge explosion

after seeing it. And given their experiences,

The plane that they saw coming in on what's called a north path either

approached, would have to have approached near simultaneously with the

plane. Basically, two planes coming in from different directions at the same

time, effectively.

And the plane that the SIT witnesses, that SIT claims went through the

would have gone through the fireball of the white plane being destroyed near the

heliport.

The plane that the Northside witnesses saw could have been the official story

plane that the official story claims came in at 9 .37 and 46 seconds.

In which case, though, if for the SID interpretation to be true, there would

have to have been a second explosion, which was in fact reported by many

witnesses at the Pentagon as it flew through, however, a pre -existing smoke

cloud. We just heard another loud explosion down at the Pentagon building

seconds ago.

That's our Audrey Barnes, who is standing nearby the Pentagon, saying

a second explosion. Audrey, did you see anything? Since these other attacks have

been aerial, did you see anything flying overhead just before this explosion?

We can't see exactly where the source of the explosion was, but you could hear

it very clearly with a loud boom.

Now that's just for 9 -11 aficionados.

Now back to what the official story says happened but did not.

further south as we've seen, at least 120 to 150 feet further south along the

West Wall, more than five minutes after all this had already happened.

This is again the official story lie from the Pentagon's own press conference

right after the attacks.

Now this is further proof that the official story simply cannot be true.

Immediately adjacent to the official story, alleged impact point to the right

south of that midline, way south of the heliport.

The official story says that Flight 77, a large Boeing 757, hit at effectively

ground level, 90 to 95 percent of the damage in the ground floor, which is

12 feet tall, to the ceiling.

at column 14.

So where you see the large circle of the fuselage is centered on column 14. And

just to the right, you can see that the columns numbered 15, 16, 17, 18, off to

the right or to the south.

Well, you will notice that where the right engine, that smaller circle is,

is over what's left of an external column that is bowed out, as are all of

They're not bowed in as they would be if impacted from a massive object from the

outside, especially a six -ton titanium and steel engine, which they didn't find

at the Pentagon, by the way, at all.

Some official spokesman actually claimed it was vaporized, which is absurd.

So it's impossible.

These columns are bowed out to the right of the alleged impact point of the

center line of the fuselage of the alleged Flight 77 impact.

And then there were also these large spools that were in front. And these

are six feet high, and they were not bowed over right in front of where they

claim that the plane hit.

And then this is a photograph to the left of the alleged impact point, which

at that red dot.

And it's a little bit more difficult to see in this, but what's remaining of the

columns on the outer columns of the west wedge are actually bowed out also to

the left of where the official story says the center nose of the fuselage

Okay. And then also a ground effect. This is all the evidence that the

story, in addition to what I've uncovered is what actually did happen,

official story did not happen as the government says it did. The ground

makes the 757 impact into the first floor effectively level, the official

says. at speed aerodynamically impossible.

It is physically impossible.

Under these conditions, the plane could not get closer, according to pilots and

aerodynamic experts, to the ground any closer than one wing length, or

approximately 56 feet, which would put it between, about what you see here, the

fourth and fifth floors up.

And yet, the official Pentagon building performance report said 90 to 95 percent

of the damage was in the ground floor, which is only 12 feet to the ceiling.

And this is a graphic representation of the ground effect because of these high

-pressure vortices that happen under the wings as it approaches the ground at

high speed.

The official story trajectory at the claimed speed is thus impossible.

Now, these are quotes from Air Force and commercial airline pilot Russ

Wittenberg.

It is totally impossible, the official story. A 757 could not possibly have

flown at those speeds without going into a high -speed stall to begin with.

The airplane won't go that fast when you start pulling those high -G maneuvers.

That plane would have fallen out of the sky at what the official story claims.

And certified Navy top gun pilot Ralph Kolstad, whom I have interviewed, with

over 26 ,000 flight hours, including 6 ,000 in Boeing 757, like American

Airlines Flight 77 was, including the physical plane that flew as Flight 77

allegedly that day.

He states, I could not have flown it the way the official story flight path was

described. I was a Navy fighter pilot and an air combat instructor and have

experience flying at low altitude, high speed aircraft.

In other words, exactly what the official story claims.

I could not have done what these alleged beginner hijackers allegedly did.

Something about the official story stinks to high heaven.

Now, the official story also claims that Flight 77, a large Boeing 757, coming

in very low at approximately 540 to 560 miles per hour, hit five light

poles in a row, there they are, without exploding.

But a 757 could not have hit one light pole, according to an expert I'm about

quote for you, let alone five in a row, and even made it to the wall without

exploding. Why?

Because the official story means that a 757, Flight 77 or otherwise, would have

to have had still 11 ,250 gallons of flammable jet fuel in its wing tanks.

Most people don't know. I certainly didn't until I did this research.

that the largest, or two of the large, almost as large as the center fuselage

tank, this is a graphic from Boeing's own website of its 757 -200 series,

is what Flight 77 was.

And this is flammable material, the jet fuel that is located in the two wing

tanks, including tanks off to the way tips.

And experts have told me, including Ralph Kolstad, who flew this very plane,

he was very clear that the fuel in the center or fuselage body tank is used up

first. And the official story says that Flight 77 or A757 went out and turned

around and came back. And before it hit the Pentagon, it was only out for an

hour and 17 minutes. And it would have used the fuel from the center fuselage

tank. And the tanks in the wings would have been flying fuel bombs.

And the official story says that the leading edge of those two wings that are

filled still with fuel, according to the official story, hit five 240 -pound

light poles like this in a row.

When the impact, I found this wonderful image, of a single flying bird does this

to a wing.

And here's an example of what a single flying goose does to the lightweight

carbon fiber nose of a plane.

And as I mentioned, I interviewed Ralph Kolstad, the top gun Navy pilot who flew

the physical plane that was Flight 77 on 9 -11. He said, if a 757 hit a light

pole going at that high speed, it would rip open the wing, rip open the fuel

tank in the wing. That wing would erupt into flames.

The wings and probably the entire plane with it would have been destroyed before

it could ever get to the building.

When a leading edge of a wing of this jet

Hit just a single light pole. It sheared the wing entirely off, spilled jet fuel

and wreckage over 100 feet, and crashed the plane to the ground.

When the same thing happened to a large airliner, Now, that plane was smaller

than a 757, but when the same kind of thing happened to a large airliner like

Flight 77, which was in Detroit in 1987, 18 feet sheared off the left wing,

which is the one that hit the light pole, when it hit two light poles, going

only 222 miles per hour, which was less than half the reported 540 to 560

miles per hour that Flight 77 was allegedly going when it allegedly hit

light poles in a row.

And no wings or large wing pieces like this were found anywhere at or in the

Pentagon.

And even if Flight 77 or any large airliner had gotten through the light

pole and tall six -foot -high spools obstacle course, a plane couldn't have

penetrated, I do not believe.

The evidence shows the newly hardened outer wall of the Pentagon.

Wedge One's outer wall, which you see a graphic to the right from the Pentagon

building performance report, how the wall had been hardened after the

City bombings.

The Pentagon decided that they wanted to harden all of its outer walls to

prevent that kind of an attack on the Pentagon.

And Wedge One's outer wall, which includes where the official story says

77 allegedly hit, had just been newly hardened to withstand terrorist attacks.

specifically the kind that the official story says happened on 9 -11.

Now, this very much parallels, doesn't it, the World Trade Centers, because we

know that the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 were specifically designed to

withstand the impact of a plane like the official story says hit those buildings

on 9 -11. Same thing with the Pentagon in just that wedge.

Interesting, isn't it?

Two feet thick after the upgrade, steel and Kevlar mesh, so the entire wall was

like a huge bomb and plane -proof vest.

This is what happened to the nose of a large airliner when it hit a non

-reinforced wall, unlike the hardened wall of the Pentagon on 9 -11, far

than the Pentagon's wall, going at a mere fraction of the speed, I believe it

was 88 miles per hour, claimed for Flight 77.

To summarize, This part.

The official story at the Pentagon on 9 -11 claims that after striking five

light poles in a row, the leading edge of the wings, and somehow making it

through the newly hardened wall that was specifically reengineered to withstand

just such a terrorist attack, as at the World Trade Center, without its sole

wing fuel tanks exploding, which Ralph Cole said would have happened,

A 757, according to the official story, then finally did explode, but only after

it was almost entirely inside the building.

And, this is the official story now, that once inside the building, after

progressively shredded and dispersed over 285 feet, going in at a diagonal 45

degree angle, that it turned into a quasi -liquid unexploded fuel and debris

slurry.

And that that slurry somehow magically reconstituted itself after going around

all of these still standing columns into a perfectly focused cone of energy,

which somehow magically cut this almost perfectly round alleged exit hole in the

ceiling wall.

Despite there being, according to Dwayne Dietz, Former NASA Director of Research

Engineering did an analysis of this slide from the Pentagon Building

Report. He has shown that there isn't a single path between the official story

alleged entrance point or impact point of Flight 77 and the alleged exit hole

the C -ring that does not have multiple still standing columns in the way that

would have dispersed this alleged quasi -liquid slurry.

according to the official story, somehow made it through the five standing light

poles without exploding the wing tanks, somehow made it through this hardened

wall like a huge Kevlar vest, somehow made it into the building

before some of the fuel exploding, and then this magical flurry reconstituting

itself around all of these still standing columns.

And then after all of that, the official story actually alleges, and this is

from the Pentagon Building Performance Report again, that, believe it or not,

Flight 77 passenger bodies and remains were found beyond the C ring exit hole.

In the AE drive between the C and the B ring, the B ring being further in

towards the center than even the C ring.

And by an amazing coincidence, this is a side note, but I think an important

one, because it talks to the passengers.

By an amazing coincidence, in the Pentagon rubble, the official story

that there just happened to have been found five unidentified body remains

that the government presumes were the hijackers.

But that happens to be the very same number, five, that the government claims

were unidentifiable remains.

that it assumes are not the hijackers, which just to be sure that no one could

ever be sure that they were one and the same, they reincinerated and dumped into

a landfill.

According to the Pentagon's own spokesman, there weren't any victims,

or any playing parts outside the Searing exit hole at all.

Terry Mitchell of the Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense for

Affairs Audiovisual Division, who was given immediate access, he was an

to the AE Drive to take the Pentagon's own official photos, answered media

questions about a photo of the C -ring hole that he showed at the September

Pentagon's own press briefing, press conference.

And he stated this for the official record, quote, There is a hole, yes, he

asked about this.

alleged exit hole. He said, yes, there's a hole in the searing.

They suspect, he doesn't say who they are, they suspect that this was where

of the aircraft came through.

Although, personally, he was physically there. He says, I didn't see any

evidence of an aircraft down there.

This pile outside the hole, he said, is all Pentagon metal.

None of that is from aircraft whatsoever.

This is Pentagon's own spokesman.

As you can see, he continues, they've punched a hole in here. This was punched

out for the rescue workers to clean out the debris.

And here you see the hole again, and it's a little bit difficult to see, but

the left of that hole is an upside -down A with a cross across it and the words

punch out. They were added after the hole was made, by the way.

Well, guess what? The inverted A is the International Personal Rescue System

symbol for dead victim removed.

This hole was made for the exit of Pentagon personnel and the entry of

and cleanup teams, just as he said.

And it was made, according to shape -charge explosive expert and mechanical

engineer, Ph .D. Michael Meyer, it was made with shape -charge explosives, not

by a plane or any part of a plane or any magical quasi -liquid slurry of a

plane.

According to shape charge expert Michael Meyer, quote, this so -called exit hole

is the signature of a shape charge explosive, not of a plane impact or any

of it. It is physically impossible, he said, for the C -ring wall to have

in a neat, clean circle like that, except by shape charge explosives.

And in addition, the alleged plane exit hole, which is at the point of the

arrow,

So where the arrow begins in the upper right, you can see that this aerial

photograph was taken after the collapse over the alleged impact point, according

to the official story. It came in at that diagonal, about a 45 -degree angle,

and according to the official story, poked its nose or some part of the plane

out of that at the point of the arrow on the inside of the C -ring.

That's the official story.

But guess what?

I found this graphic.

From the Washington Post immediately after 9 -11, that hole, alleged exit

is actually shown in the Pentagon's own data as one of three exit holes in this

legend. It's a little bit hard to see, but it says exit holes, third up from

bottom of the legend, exit holes, plural.

And then on the graphic itself, the actual holes are labeled with little

dots, one, two, and three.

And those...

perfectly matched with these three exit holes on the inside of the C -ring.

Now, evidently, my pointing this out, which I've been doing for a number of

years now, worried some insiders because an alleged 9 -11 truth researcher,

I won't say which one, has now on his website put out this doctored diagram.

where he has changed the original Washington Post graphic to say that

only a single plain exit hole.

So the elephant in the room, one of the big elephants in the room, not the only

one, proving that the official story at the Pentagon is false, again, is time.

Because we remember that the Pentagon heliports...

Firehouse clock was stopped by the violent event there at 9 .32 and 30

versus the official story alleged impact time of Flight 77 of 5 minutes and 16

seconds later at almost 9 .38.

The official story is not only wrong, in addition, about the time of the

Pentagon attack, which it claims was 9 .37 and 46 seconds, but is hiding the

real time of the attack for obvious reasons.

Interestingly, after the attack, the Army did not know the time. The Army

was trying to figure out when its building was attacked, let alone how.

And so they asked seismologists to check the five closest seismic readout

stations for any indication of the time of impact, as had been done for the

World Trade Center towers, and Pennsylvania for that matter.

And guess what?

They found no above -noise seismic signal at all for the official Pentagon

alleged impact time. None. Zero. There was no impact signal at the Flight 77

alleged impact time at all.

And yet, according to Dave Gap, who was a top Air

Force pilot and crash investigator for over 30 years, quote,

If a 757 had struck anywhere near ground level at the Pentagon, there definitely

would have been a seismic signal.

Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Dave Gap retired, 30 -year veteran senior

crash investigator, and who was chief of master air attack planning for both the

Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Now, this is one of the frames from the famous five frames that were taken from

one of the two Pentagon,

security cameras outside the West Wall.

And if you'll note that on the bottom left of this famous, one of the famous

five frames, is September 12th, not September 11th.

And if you'll notice, the time is 537 p .m.

All right?

Well, the Pentagon claims in its report in Pentagon 9 -11, the Pentagon claims

that this is the date and time that these frames were downloaded after the

attacks. That's how they explain that it's September 12th.

If so, however, because all security cameras have digital time records or

would be useless.

If so, the original date and time stamps have been removed before they were made

public.

So the time of whatever caused the fireball, this famous photograph that

leaked in the spring of 2002.

and was on the cover of every newspaper in the world as alleged proof that a

plane hit the Pentagon, which it does not, the time of whatever caused that

fireball is being actively hidden by the Pentagon and the FBI.

It is obviously not at the official story alleged time of 9 .37 and 46

Also, that one five frames video, there were actually two,

But those two almost identical videos from two cameras close to each other

outside the Pentagon West wall happens to be, we now know, the

only one at the time of this report that I'm about to read you, and now we know

since the Massawi trial in 2005, I believe it was, is only one of two of

the 85 videos that the FBI has in its possession.

That shows any evidence of an alleged impact, which it does not.

Below is the key paragraph from the sworn under penalty of perjury affidavit

report by FBI Special Agent McGuire in response to an FOIA request to

investigate, to look at, and report back about all 85 videos.

Quote, out of the remaining 13 videotapes, which did show the Pentagon

site even, 12, in other words, all but one of those videotapes, showed the

Pentagon after the alleged impact.

And she says, under oath, FBI agent, I determined that only a single videotape

showed the alleged impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11th, and

that is that famous five frames that has the wrong date and the wrong time, and

they are hiding.

the time of that fireball for obvious reasons.

So why is the Pentagon hiding the attack fireball time?

Because, of course, the first violent event happened over five minutes before

the official story says Flight 77 was anywhere close to that building.

And the real time exposes what really happened.

In addition to the early white plane approach and destruction at 9 .32 and 30

seconds, as we have already seen, This should give you a hint.

The FBI's official 911 investigation codename is PentBomb.

It's not PentPlane.

And this stands for, officially, Pentagon Twin Towers Bombing.

The FBI actually lied outright to one of the Jersey girls who had lost their

husbands in the World Trade Center towers on 9 -11, telling them that,

all of its investigation abbreviations end in bomb. This is a lie.

The anthrax investigation, for instance, which is, of course, related to 9 -11,

does not. It is codenamed by the FBI Amerithrax, not Ameribomb.

And as well, codenames for investigations known to be about

bomb. For example, the Oklahoma City bombing investigation is codenamed Oak

Bomb. So it should tell us something that the FBI's codename for the entire 9

-11 investigation is Pent Bomb.

That, it was, the code name of the entire 9 -11 investigation, was

by the FBI's own director, Robert Mueller, in 2011.

The terrorist hunter, this is the cover image on that issue, which was right

after the alleged killing of Osama bin Laden.

FBI Director Mueller to Time Magazine, May 10, 2011.

Quote, the FBI's Strategic Intelligence Operations Center filled to capacity on

September 11th and remained that way through PentBomb. The FBI's, this is

part of the director's quote, the FBI's cryptonym for Pentagon Twin Towers and

bombing.

The official story states there were no bombs at the Pentagon, that there were

no bombs at the World Trade Center, that there were no pre -placed explosives,

nanothermite or otherwise, at the World Trade Center or at the Pentagon. The FBI

knows otherwise.

The real story at the Pentagon, just as at the World Trade Center, is pre

-placed explosives.

But before we get into this compelling evidence for inside explosives, first I

want to go back to this very large elephant in the room, the real attack

The first attack on the Pentagon, and there was more than one, was not at

9 .38, or even the white plane explosion time.

of 9 .32 and 30 seconds, but according to inside witnesses, just after 9 .30.

Wedge 2, and remember Wedge 2 was from the center line of the West Wall to the

left in the north, which was not yet hardened.

Wedge 2 E -ring Army Specialist April Gallup, a very famous Pentagon witness,

her wristwatch was stopped by a major inside explosion.

She insists just after 9 .30.

Now, of course, Her watch may have been slightly off, in which case her watch

could have been stopped by the same violent event at 9 .32 and 30 seconds.

However, I doubt it because the explosions that she experienced went off

the building and did not go through the wall.

And whatever happened to the white plane also did not go through the wall. They

were separate events.

And she claims also that this major inside explosion just after 9 .30

as she hit the on button on her computer.

And she was also far from the Wedge 1 alleged impact point, much further to

left or the north in Wedge 2.

Also, when I looked at the early times of reports from presumably Pentagon

sources themselves as to when the attack on the Pentagon happened, they were

all... quote, about 9 .30 a .m., about 9 .30, USA Today, Reuters, New York

Times, Frederick Freelance Star, U .S. News & World Report.

And as time went by and as the official lie solidified, the times got later and

later and later until the Pentagon finally settled and the 9 -11 commission

report, big lie, settled on almost 9 .38.

Official testimony and records of the real...

Early time of the Pentagon attack.

White House counsel, later Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez himself, stated

an official taped Navy lecture, and I have the tape, quote, the Pentagon was

attacked at 9 .32.

The FAA official timeline says the Pentagon was attacked at 9 .32.

Denmark's about -to -be foreign minister, Per Stig Moller, says the

attacked between 9 .32 and 9 .34.

If the Pentagon was really attacked, not at almost 938, but a little bit after

932, you would expect major official reactions by the Bush -Cheney

administration to happen immediately after the Pentagon attack.

And that is true.

There was an E -4B command and control plane circling over Washington, D .C.

at 930.

And then the Pentagon explosion happened.

And then a White House evacuation happened while presumed Flight 77 was

miles and miles from Washington.

The Pentagon attack triggered the White House and other federal building

evacuations, which happened just after 9 .32.

Quote, Newsweek, at about 9 .30 a .m., Secret Service men told staffers

that is evacuating the White House West Wing, to run, not walk as far away as

possible. Washington Post online version on the day of the attack, September

11th itself, the crash at the Pentagon triggered immediate security steps in

Washington area, including evacuation of the West Wing of the White House. It

was the Pentagon attack that caused all of officialdom to finally act as if they

were really being attacked, not the World Trade Center attacks.

It's amazing.

The approximately 932 Pentagon attack also finally triggered the Secret

to remove Bush from the floor of the classroom.

Remember, he just kept sitting there.

I was watching in a split screen with Bush continuing to look at the kids

reading the book on a pet goat, while on the other side, innocent Americans were

jumping to their desks from the Twin Towers.

After inexplicably allowing President Bush to sit for eight to nine minutes in

floor of the classroom,

after he had already been told, according to him and Andrew Card, but we

take their words for it, don't we, that the Second World Trade Center tower had

been hit and that, quote, America is under attack, Card allegedly told him in

his ear, the Secret Service finally acted as if the ongoing attacks were a

emergency, but only after the Pentagon was attacked at the actual time of the

attack that I'm telling you about, 9 .32 and 30 seconds.

Only then did they whisk Bush out of the Florida classroom, and at approximately

9 .32, taking him to his limousine, which left at 9 .35.

In response to the actual approximate 9 .32 Pentagon attack, Andrews Air Force

Base went on alert, quote, between 9 .30 and 9 .35.

Official story says Flight 77 didn't even hit the building until almost 9

The offer of interceptors to the Secret Service by Major Daniel Kane of Andrews

Air Force Base came immediately after World Trade Center 2 was hit, was

initially declined.

But the Secret Service suddenly changed its mind right after the Pentagon at 9

.33.

Quite plain explodes there at 9 .30 seconds earlier.

At 9 .33, Langley Air Force Base interceptor pilot Dean Eckman received a

-down order for any planes coming within 30 miles of Washington, right after the

explosion of a plane at the Pentagon.

And I believe that was also after inside explosions that already happened near

April Gallup's desk at about 9 .30.

Even in New York City, where two attacks on the World Trade Center towers had

already happened and not yet caused a shutdown of the New York Stock Exchange.

The exchange was finally shut down, according to the New York Times, at 9

which is the shorthand for right after 9 .32 and 30 seconds.

Firefighters were at the Pentagon fighting fires before the official

almost 9 .38 alleged impact time of Flight 77.

And those were, of course, the Pentagon firefighters.

One of them leapt under the van, the other one raced out on the lawn, and

was a third who survived the destruction inside the Heliport firehouse, and they

immediately started fighting fires.

There wasn't any other plane approach or impact at that building at any level

that could have impacted, like the White Plain.

Additional evidence for inside the building, primary explosions at the

similar to what you already know about pre -placed inside explosives at World

Trade Centers 1, 2, and 7.

Evidence that the Wedge 1 collapse, Wedge 1, again, the official story place

the alleged impact of Flight 77, evidence of the Wedge 1 collapse over

alleged plane penetration damage path on the inside of the building was, in

fact, due to explosives.

I'm about to give you that evidence, including possibly thermite.

These are...

Images on the top of the Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building after it was

known to have been destroyed by inside bombs as well as an outside truck bomb,

but we know that there were at least four internal bombs in addition to the

cover story outside Ryder truck bomb.

And then at the bottom is the Pentagon after collapse of the section of Wedge 1

over the alleged impact point of Flight 77, using Al -Qaeda hijackers as the

cover story.

Witnesses to the sounds of a series of explosions also in the Pentagon use

almost identical language to World Trade Center firefighters describing the

going off of pre -placed controlled demolition explosives.

These are just some of these witnesses.

Lieutenant McCowan, first floor D -ring in the Naval Command Center of the

Pentagon on 9 -11, quote, it sounded like a series of explosions going off, a

series of bombs exploding, similar to like firecrackers when you light them

you just get that series going off.

Again, identical language to the description of firefighters from the Nod

Brothers video of the World Trade Center saying they went off like firecrackers

coming down.

Lieutenant

Colonel

Thurman, second floor D ring of the Pentagon on 9 -11.

To me, it didn't seem like a plane. To me, it seemed like it was a bomb.

Being in the military, I've been around grenade and artillery explosions. In

other words, he's been around bombs.

It was a two -part explosion to me. It seemed like there was a percussion blast

that blew me kind of backwards in my cubicle to the side, and then it seemed

if a massive explosion went off at the same time.

This graphic, which is a little bit difficult to see.

shows the explosion that McCowan and Thurman experienced. This is from the

Pentagon Building Performance Report.

That's a vertical rectangle that is in orange.

And the official Pentagon Building Performance Report itself states that

damage on the...

First floor was probably due to an independent, that is independent of any

impact, explosion, as fire would have at most, the official story is fire, would

have at most collapsed the second floor downward, not thrusted upward.

So what that rectangle is, is the area where the ceiling of the first

floor and the floor of the second floor was pushed upwards by a very major

force.

and it could not have been due to a lateral plane impact, which probably

that this famous photograph at the Pentagon Wall is of that explosion.

Why? If you notice that this fireball in the center of the wall, which may or

may not be the same fireball seen in that famous five frames, but this looks

like the white -yellow hot of a thermite explosion to me.

Whether it is or not, it remains to be seen. But if you notice, there are two

separate sources of smoke. To the right, which is to the south, is

the major billowing black smoke cloud that everybody knows about. But there's

second one to the left, which is at the heliport, and they are separate.

And neither of those smoke clouds are coming from that fiery point.

Now compare what you just saw at the Pentagon to the explosion of

a plane hitting a cement wall.

It's nothing like it.

There's no pulverized cement debris.

Instead, as we are going to see, that the Pentagon wall at that point turned

mush.

So I have to ask myself, was thermite placed somewhere at or around the

of the so -called plane penetration path on the inside of the Pentagon?

An autopsy of the concrete of the destroyed and damaged support columns on

inside of the Pentagon in the alleged internal penetration path of Flight 77

the E -ring.

showed the effect of intense concentrated and prolonged heat that,

the experts who analyzed it, turned some of the concrete literally to mush.

And that mush had a reddish and orange tinge due, according to them, to their

report, to the presence of iron.

Now, we know from the analysis of Niels Heret and Richard Gage and others at the

World Trade Center, both sudden intense heat, like you saw in that fireball,

that white, yellow hot fireball at the Pentagon Wall and the resultant molten

iron are signatures of the reaction of thermite on steel.

This is a photograph from the Pentagon Building Performance Report of what's

inside the columns of the west wedge.

These are reinforced steel supports.

In fact, a massive explosion happened at just the time of the collapse of the

outer wall over the alleged plane impact point, which is yet further evidence

that another internal explosion caused that collapse.

This is a live video clip from the Pentagon that morning.

Note the time on the clip of 10 .10 a .m.

And once again, on the left -hand side of your screen, you are looking at the

Tower 2, the first one. This is all New York now.

Michael, Michael, if you can hear me, we just heard another explosion down at

the Pentagon building. We just heard another loud explosion down at the

building just seconds ago.

That's our Audrey Barnes, who is standing nearby the Pentagon, saying

a second explosion. Audrey, did you see anything? Because these other attacks

have been aerial. Did you see anything flying overhead just before this

explosion? We can't see exactly where the source of the explosion was, but you

could hear it very clearly with a loud...

Boom. And I'm looking for another plume of smoke. I don't see anything right

now. It might be still in that same general area where the fire is burning

now. But you can clearly hear another loud explosion.

This Pentagon performance report graphic also falsely claims, if you notice

across the upper part, those little red or orange dots, those are on the

columns, the outside columns.

Column 14, kind of in the middle, is where the official story says Flight

nose hit, and then it went in at a diagonal angle. And down in the lower

is the alleged C -ring exit hole.

The Pentagon Building Performance Report falsely claims that eight, those are

those orange dots, that eight external columns were destroyed.

However, that is not true.

And this is the proof of it.

I was very excited when I found this extremely rare and extremely important

photograph. It's the only one I know of that is very clear that was taken after

the initial fires were out at the Pentagon Wall.

This is at the alleged official story impact point, but before the collapse of

the wall over this very area.

And what you see is that almost all the damage, in fact, And as the

Pentagon Building Performance Report itself said, I would say at least 90 %

the damage, if not more, was on the first floor, and only a very small

percentage where you see that kind of T with the two windows on either side

where the glass is blown out on the second floor.

But if you notice...

There are the columns, even though they're bowed out, are still standing to

right under the T and over to the left. And there are only four columns that are

missing, not eight, which is impossible for the official story of a plane that

had a wingspan of 124 feet.

you're looking at only 50 feet of a non -round impact hole. And many people in

the 9 -11 truth movement falsely have claimed that, inadvertently or

that this T area with the windows blown out on either side on the second floor

in the center of the photograph, that that is the so -called entrance hole of

the plane. It is not. And what they do is they show photographs that don't show

the bottom floor at all.

And then remember, of course, that the columns were bowed out and not in, as

they would be from an external impact of a very large, fast -flying object of

great force.

And at the Pentagon on the morning of 9 -11, you saw all of these fire trucks

putting out their mist and spray and foam.

I believe the real purpose of that mist and spray and foam, which really wasn't

putting out fires at that point, was to prevent you from seeing that there was

not an alleged impact hole where the official story claimed that it was.

So we have seen that the physical evidence clearly supports primary inside

explosives. By primary inside explosives, I mean that aren't the

impact of a plane or fires therefrom.

Yes, there were reports.

by eyewitnesses also, of explosions and explosives throughout the chain of

command from the very highest levels of the Pentagon on down.

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and his three -star top military aide.

When Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld was asked by Sam Donaldson what happened at

the Pentagon right after the attacks, he said, a bomb?

Acting head of the National Military Command Center, Captain Charles Leidig.

He, Captain Leidig, had no awareness of Flight 77,

coming back to Washington, D .C. at all.

His first awareness was a call from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's three

aide, that's an extremely high military officer, who asked if he, meaning

Leidig, felt the explosion in the building and asked Leidig to investigate

whether it might be a terrorist attack.

Witnesses to cordite and gunpowder, which has an extremely distinct smell

jet fuel and kerosene, burning jet fuel and kerosene. Chairman of the Joint

Chiefs of Staff himself, General Shelton, upon arriving at the Pentagon

-11, has said in his memoirs, page 434,

called Without Hesitation, quote, the smell of cordite or gunpowder was

overwhelming.

Don Perkle, another witness, people shouted in the corridor outside my

that a bomb had gone off. Even before stepping outside, I could smell the

cordite. Then I knew explosives had been set off somewhere, and many other

witnesses as well.

So, according to the official story then, the only primary damage at the

Pentagon was in the outer E, D, and C rings in Wedge 1, due solely to the

and result in fires and damage from a plane, 90 to 95 % on the ground floor, a

little bit on the second floor.

going only into the inside of the C ring. However, that is not what

There is, in fact, major damage on 9 -11 in the innermost rings, the A and B

rings as well.

In an interview that I personally did at the Naval Postgraduate School with the

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations on 9 -11, former Top

Marais, Robert Andrews, he told me, quote, as he drew a diagram of it, which

I've retained,

Quote, my aide and I had to walk over dead bodies on the inside of the

A ring, unquote.

Also, the B ring, next in from the C ring towards the center courtyard, the B

ring between the fourth and fifth quarters was decimated.

Washington Post.

Pentagon rescue team to the Washington Post. On 9 -11, it's online version.

that day of the attacks, quote, when we got into the building, we started to

feel the heat right away, and as we walked deeper down the hallways, deeper

means towards the center, not away from it, it got hotter and hotter, not cooler

and cooler.

It was just fire everywhere, not so much smoke, but just fire all around us. You

couldn't see the plane. You couldn't see anything of a plane, just debris

everywhere you looked.

And again, deeper means deeper towards the center of the building. And as we

have seen, there was a major internal explosion at or just after 9 .30 near

April Gallup's desk.

According to her sworn videotaped testimony, April Gallup experienced all

below at 9 .30, the time that a massive inside the building explosion near her

desk stopped her wristwatch.

This was in the outer E -ring in Wedge 2.

which, remember, is at least 150 feet north of where the official story claims

plane hit the wall almost eight minutes later.

April Gallup said she, quote, thought I had triggered it when I touched the on

button on my computer. I thought it was a bomb, unquote.

Gallup saw no plane, no plane parts, no seats, no passengers, no passenger body,

then no luggage inside the building.

And she said there was no smell of jet fuel and no jet fuel fires that she saw.

In fact, the only fires April Gallup said she saw were coming out of the

computers, which was also experienced by other inside the building witnesses,

for example, by Tracy Webb in the E -ring off of Corridor 4, which was in

alleged penetration path of the alleged plane.

April Gallup said the floor was not hot inside the building as she walked out

with just one shoe and one bare foot, and yet the sole of her bare foot was

completely unburned, as we're about to see in the photo in the next slide.

And in addition, some dozen other inside the building witnesses in the area

where April Gallup worked.

She meets with them, and they confirm her experience.

And here is a picture of April Gallup on the lawn.

This is what happened inside the wedge two to the north or the left of the

center line.

And notice that she is not burned, and those are the bottom of her feet.

And she has testified under oath to me in a two -hour under oath videotaped

interview and testimony that she lost one of her shoes, and she walked over.

Whatever it was she walked over, that was allegedly, according to the official

story, burning jet fuel, and she wasn't burned, including on the bottom of her

bare foot.

On September 11, 2001, I had returned back from maternity leave.

I had to get Elijah situated in daycare.

I walked into the building.

I had to clear Elijah to go to the area.

There were some things that they wanted me to take care of prior to me taking

him to the daycare.

I sat down at the computer.

to actually turn the computer on. As soon as I pressed the button, boom.

So at that particular time, based off what happened, I thought I had triggered

bomb.

I was covered from my neck all the way down to my back in debris.

My son was completely blown out of his stroller, and some of the floors had

collapsed within, and people were trapped in between the floors.

My son had stopped crying.

So I felt strength out of nowhere to actually low crawl from out under the

debris to try to find my son.

While I was coming out of the Pentagon, I didn't see any evidence of metal,

airplane seats, luggage, nothing that would give me any

indication that it was a plane that had hit the building.

I lost one shoe, so I was walking through the area barefooted.

So I was particularly careful to try to make sure I did not step on anything

sharp while I had my son on my shoulder.

I did not have jet fuel over my body. My son didn't have jet fuel over his body.

The people that I helped didn't have jet fuel on their body.

So again, there was nothing on the inside that would give me any indication

there was a plane on that particular day that hit the building.

Most of the people that were in the area where I was located,

You know, maybe I was off of my judgment, but in speaking with everyone,

conclusive that no one else in the area where I was located had seen any parts

of planes or luggage or baggage or anything of that nature.

Yes, I believe it's something part of much more sinister, and that's why my

is to try to push for a federal grand jury.

so that people can be brought forth for perjury and obstruction of justice.

When you go out of your way to fabricate an official story, when obviously the

evidence that appears, whether it's footage or the work that many people

done, shows that the official story couldn't possibly be true, then yes, you

should be brought to justice.

And when people can come together and feel like they can utilize human beings

lambs to a slaughter, Yes, that's what's unpatriotic. That's what's un

-American. We'll turn our own people and sacrifice them for whatever their

motive may be, regardless that their motive is of no significance, but the

that they would use innocent human beings as lambs to slaughter, to

whatever it is their cause or motive is.

Yes, they should be brought to justice, and it's obvious that the official story

is... It has been fabricated. And here is an aerial photo showing a large E

-ring cavity inside the outer E -ring wall of Wedge 2, not just Wedge 1, where

the official story says the plane impacted and there was later a collapse.

April Gallup, also you should know for 9 -11 truth aficionados, did not walk out

of the alleged entrance hole. Of course, there wasn't an entrance hole to begin

with to walk out of. But the first official interview that she gave, which

to the Army historians, she stated that she and her son exited through a window

behind the Fort Myer fire truck that you have already seen, the back of which

was on fire after the white plane exploded there at 9 .32 and 30 seconds

stopped. the Heliport clock at that time.

And she was, the Army historians also interviewed other people, the other

that helped her and her infant son out of that blown -out window just behind

fire truck.

And here you see the fire truck, and you can see the blown -out window behind

the back of the fire truck.

And then just as the outer columns, as we've seen to the right and left of the

alleged impact point of Flight 77 and Wedge 1, were about outwards, not

In other words, consistent with an internal explosion.

Pressure wave coming out instead of an external impact by a large, heavy, fast

-flying object.

Similarly, in Wedge 2, further north where April Gallup worked, a massive

internal force thrust office debris towards the outer windows. And you can

them. If this were a higher -resolution photo, you could clearly see that this

office debris is just forced out through the windows.

Windows also first bowed out and then back in.

Witness Lieutenant...

Colonel Victor Correa, who worked in the office of the Army Deputy Chief of

Staff for Personnel, in the direct path of the alleged official story,

penetration of Flight 77, said, quote, I noticed the windows going out and then

coming back in. We thought it was some kind of an explosion, that somebody had

got in there and planted bombs because of that.

Army Fort Monmouth TDY auditor Michael Nielsen, whom I personally interviewed,

told me, quote, hundreds of people raced down the halls past him at the south

side exit, shouting, it's a bomb, bombs, it's a bomb, i .e. explosives.

And as a plane did not hit at the wedge one impact point, this famous five

frames video, which we're showing again, is therefore evidence of what? Only of

an explosion and or the white plane destruction.

Not of an impact.

There were also multiple primary inside explosions independent of any impact or

fires they're from. We've already seen April Gallup says that her watch was

stopped by this massive explosion by her desk in Wedge 2 at 9 .30, at 9 .31, and

40 seconds. Stopped Navy area clock, which we saw very early with the

clock, and at precisely 9 .43.

According to the official story, sole survivor of the Naval Command Center,

which was the second and third rings in in the alleged penetration path of

Flight 77, stated at precisely 9 .43 was the explosion in the Naval Command

Center. At 10 o 'clock, explosives went off on columns in the alleged

penetration path.

And at 9 .48, there was another large Pentagon explosion.

There were bombs going off inside the buildings over quite a long period of

time. This slide shows the relative times of the inside -the -building

explosions at the Pentagon on 9 -11 relative to the outside explosions at

Pentagon that morning.

At 9 -30, as we have seen in Wedge 2, well to the north of where the official

story says Flight 77 allegedly impacted, almost eight minutes later,

April Gallup's wristwatch was stopped by a massive explosion inside the

building. At 9 .30.

At 9 .31 and 40 seconds, another inside -the -building explosion stopped the

Navy area clock.

Now, this was also the likely time of the D -ring explosion that thrust the

second -floor floor slab upwards.

And then there is an external explosion, the one we know about at 9 .32 and 30

seconds, when the white plane was destroyed near the Heliport, stopping

Heliport firehouse clock at that time.

But there was also another external explosion, and that was at approximately

.34 and 10 seconds.

That was when the huge billowing black smoke cloud started to billow upwards

from a diesel trailer fire outside the Wedge 1 wall near the official story

alleged impact point. And we know that time because it was caught on the

Doubletree Hotel security camera digital clock.

The next inside the building explosion, and this was at, quote, precisely 943.

According to Lieutenant Kevin Schaefer, who according to the official story was

the only survivor of the Naval Command Center that morning, he said that a

massive orange fireball explosion went off in the Naval Command Center at

precisely 943.

And at 9 .48, according to the Secret Service's log that morning, there was

another Pentagon explosion.

And the well -known explosion at the Pentagon at approximately 10 a .m.,

explosives likely went off on inside columns in the alleged penetration path

Flight 77, causing the Wedge 1 E -ring collapse over the alleged impact point

about 10 o 'clock.

The Pentagon also was expecting explosives.

According to AP report on 9 -11 itself, the Pentagon attack came minutes after

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld predicted there will be another event.

There were bomb -sniffing dog teams at the Pentagon before the attack.

Inside explosives at the Pentagon, just as at the World Trade Center, explain

why there was no advanced siren to alert personnel of alleged approaching danger

to evacuate the building, as there was no incoming at the time of the alleged

official story Pentagon attack.

The National Military Command Center didn't learn of any alleged incoming

hijacked plane until 9 .31, after the explosion.

There was no way for non -perpetrators of the actual inside job to know the

explosives were about to go off in order to trigger alarms and an evacuation.

And April Gallup and many others testified there was no alert to trigger

leave the building to save their lives.

Even after Pentagon workers shouted a bomb had gone off, still no alarm

according to Don Perkle.

The chief NBC Pentagon correspondent on 9 -11, Jim Mikloszewski, I believe,

stated, at 9 .45, still no sirens and no official evacuation order.

Primary inside explosions at the Pentagon are absolute proof of what? An

job. Outside terrorists, whether Al -Qaeda or Santa Claus, could not have

it.

None insider terrorists would have targeted the easy -to -hit roof or the

central courtyard or the offices of high -ranking officials on the far side from

the official impact.

point where Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs

had their offices.

They would never have chosen the least populated, newly hardened, only newly

hardened West Wedge, which was also the hardest to hit due to many physical

obstacles in the path, a hill, an antenna, light poles, a chain link

the six foot high schools.

Now you're going to see evidence that some of these, at least some if not all,

of the inside explosives were targeted to take out particular functions and

perhaps even individuals.

The Naval Command Center was targeted not by a plane but by inside explosives.

This is a graphic from the Washington Post immediately after the attacks. It

actually titled The Targeted Ones.

And it's a little bit difficult to see, but where they show that the plane,

allege that the plane hit at the official story point, Then there is that

of gray, darker gray area, and within that is the Naval Command Center, which

blown up in the legend up at the top.

And in the right -hand corner is number eight, which is the Naval Intelligence

Cell. That turns out to be very important.

The Naval Command Center official story is that only one person survived, the

Naval Command Center on 9 -11. That's important because that part was...

between two and three rings in from the official story alleged impact point of

the plane.

It says that only Kevin Schaefer was the survivor at the Naval Command Center.

He became a top staffer, I think not coincidentally, on the key 9 -11

subgroup that was allegedly investigating the Pentagon attack and

non -response, which was the heart of the 9 -11 PSYOP.

including three NORAD versions, at least, as Professor Griffin has pointed

at least two of which must be false, if not all three.

Just briefly, the Naval Command Center cover -up is important because I

interviewed Rear Admiral Hathaway, who was in charge of the Naval Command

on 9 -11, and he told me that the official story is not true, that

Kevin Schaefer was not the only survivor, that in that little intel

He stated that there in the intelligence cell, which was a hardened room,

hardened against bombs itself on the inside of the Pentagon, there were 18 to

intelligence officers, most of whom also survived.

Why is that not part of the official story?

Follow the money.

Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and the Pentagon's comptroller, Dov Zachheim,

publicly acknowledged the day before 9 -11 on September 10th.

that the Pentagon was missing and could not account for $2 .3 trillion.

The adversary is closer to home.

It's the Pentagon bureaucracies. According to some estimates, we cannot

.3 trillion.

Mr. Secretary, according to the Comptroller General of the United

are serious financial management problems at the Pentagon, to which Mr.

alluded.

Fiscal year 1999, $2 .3 trillion missing.

Fiscal year 2000, $1 .1 trillion missing.

And DOD is the number one reason why the government can't balance its checkbook.

The Pentagon has claimed year after year that the reason it can't account for

the money is because its computers don't communicate with each other.

My second question, Mr. Secretary, is who has the contract today to make those

systems communicate with each other? How long have they had those contracts?

And how much have the taxpayers paid for them?

Finally, Mr. Secretary, after the last hearing, I thought that my office was

promised a written response to my question regarding the four war games on

September 11th. I have not yet received that response.

but would like for you to respond to the questions that I've put to you today,

and then I do expect the written response to my previous question,

the end of the week.

Thank you, Representative.

The second question,

I've forgotten what the second

question was.

Susan Lindauer has stated publicly at the Vancouver hearings, which I was also

speaker and an expert witness, that the CIA knew this was actually $5 trillion

at that time.

The Army financial audit area and the records therein were destroyed in the

attack in the area close to April Gallup's desk with those inside

that she insists went off right around 9 .30.

And she also, if you recall, claimed that the only fires she saw on the

of the E -ring and Wedge 2 were coming out of the Army Area computers.

Flight 77 not only did not hit the Pentagon, it didn't get anywhere close,

it was never ID'd, ever, affirmatively ID'd, as the eastward -flying plane that

approached the Pentagon at almost 9 .38.

With Barbara Olson's phone calls now officially nonexistent per the FBI,

American Airlines, and the Pentagon, there is, according to Professor David

Griffin, and I agree with him, zero, that is no evidence that the outgoing

plane, whatever it was, even turned back east.

And with its transponder off, Dulles Air Traffic Control had only a blip, never

a positive ID, and did not have any altitude or speed, which has been

in a videotaped interview by Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, that

when he talked to the FAA, to Monty Belger, that Belger said they did not

altitude or speed.

and there was a C -130 pilot that allegedly saw the attack on the

is not true. He never ID'd the plane, and he did not see the impact, which can

be proven from the now -released audio tapes from the air traffic control tower

that the C -130 pilot was talking to and from the radar record.

Regarding the plane that took off from Dulles at 8 .20, the reason...

I said, quote, whatever it was, unquote, is because the official Bureau of

Transportation or BTS online database statistics for all live civilian flights

that flew on 9 -11 that morning does not include Flight 77.

The FDR, the Flight Data Recorder Data Fields, Also, this alleged flight data

recorder from Flight 77 that one group of officials at the Pentagon said was

found just inside the entrance hole and another group of Pentagon officials said

was found just inside the exit hole.

The flight data recorder data fields that could have positively identified

FDR as coming from Flight 77 or even from any American Airlines plane at all

been zeroed out.

And according to FDR expert Dennis Cimino, had been intentionally removed.

This is further proof that the flight data recorder data, importantly based

which the Pentagon has claimed that it learned the time of the attack of almost

938 from the FDR.

Further proof it was doctored is that the data from that FDR was downloaded

hours before the Pentagon reportedly found it.

Why the 937 in 46 seconds so -called, I call it the FDR or radar data plane,

cannot be Flight 77.

At 854 in 43 seconds, Indianapolis FAA Air Traffic Control, which was tracking

what they believed was Flight 77, began a descent before the official story says

it turned back east. And it had already descended, according to the Christian

Science Monitor,

Some 6 ,000 feet by the time its transponder was turned off. However,

to the official story to the Pentagon itself, the flight data recorder plane,

alleged to be Flight 77, didn't begin its descent until after the turn back

of whatever plane it was and didn't begin its descent until 901.

And as the same physical plane cannot do both, the official story

FDR plane cannot be Flight 77.

Thus, the flight data recorder allegedly found in the Pentagon rubble, whether

it was found wherever it was found, claimed to have been from this 938

also cannot have been from Flight 77.

So if the FDR plane that approached the Pentagon at almost 938 wasn't Flight 77,

what was it?

Evidence it was a military plane.

All of the Dulles air traffic controllers thought it was a military

Daniel O 'Brien, who was the Dulles air traffic controller tracking that blip,

said the speed, the maneuverability, the way he turned, and again, there was no

altitude and no speed information attached to this. We all thought in the

room, they were then many people standing around her back looking at the

we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers,

that it was a military plane.

In the room, it was almost a sense of relief.

This must be a fighter.

This must be one of our guys.

So what happened to Flight 77?

The bottom line is we don't know.

The government needs to tell us.

This is what we do know.

We know that at 9 .09 and 55 seconds, FAA, Indianapolis Air Traffic Control,

reported that...

The flight that had left Dulles Airport at 8 .20 in the morning reported it

missing and possibly crashed to the Air Force search and rescue.

It is not a coincidence, in my opinion, that it was at this exact second,

almost, that military air traffic controllers first, in quotes, reported

up the never positively identified eastward flying blip that they then

all... established protocol to assume and claim was Flight 77, but it was not,

clearly intended, in my opinion, to stop the Air Force from search and rescue.

The non -coincidence of this timing, I believe, is strong evidence that the

military had been tracking the eastward flying plane all along via military

transponder mode that only it and not the FAA civilian air traffic controllers

could see.

And thus, for the military, there was no so -called radar hole, making the plane

invisible for this part of its flight.

And also that the official story plane, alleged to have been Flight 77, was a

military plane giving off a friendly, identify friend or foe IFF transponder

signal, would explain why it did not trigger any interceptor response and was

not shot down.

Therefore, in my opinion, I do not believe that there was any stand -down

needed to explain what happened at the Pentagon for two important reasons.

One, it wasn't a civilian airliner. We've shown that by many means.

And it didn't get through the system, the defense system, to hit the building

any case.

In summary.

Flight 77 was nowhere near the Pentagon when inside explosives went off over

five minutes before it allegedly even approached the building, was nowhere

the Pentagon when a white plane with two stripes, red and blue or red, orange,

and blue, made to simulate an American airline plane, exploded near or at the

heliport, stopping the heliport clock at 9 .32 and 30 seconds, over five minutes

before the official story said Flight 77 got anywhere near the Pentagon.

Also, there is zero evidence that whatever plane left Dulles at 820 turned

east at all towards Washington, D .C., in any case.

And the westward flying blip was reported possibly crashed by FAA to

Air Force search and rescue before it even turned east.

And even if whatever plane was flying east had hit the Pentagon, which it

didn't, we have proven, It couldn't have penetrated to just the inside of the C

-ring, as claimed by the official story, and have caused the massive destruction

found all the way into the innermost A and B rings.

And finally, the FDR plane, alleged to have been Flight 77, was almost

a military plane.

The real story at the Pentagon, I believe I have proven to you.

is thus the same as the real story at the World Trade Center on 9 -11. That

story is pre -placed inside the building explosives with plane approaches and

impacts and or destructions of the plane as the cover causes.

And inside explosives at both the World Trade Center and the Pentagon can mean

only one thing. 9 -11 was literally an inside job.

How do we identify the operational mass murderers? We would need to know who

made and controlled the weaponized military -grade nanothermite that has

found, some of it unreacted, in the World Trade Center dust, number one.

And I believe we would need to know who made and controlled the weaponized

nanospores in the anthrax letters, which were dated September 11th, after all.

And who specializes in nanosol gel processes, which use silicon and...

that were found both in the World Trade Center dust and in the anthrax letter

spores.

And who would that be?

So who could have controlled weapons -grade nanothermite of the signature in

World Trade Center dust?

Well, I found out. This is at least one serious possibility.

It may not be the only one. But remember, this is an inside job.

Quote from Army Major Doug Rocky.

retired director of the United States Army's depleted uranium project, to both

myself and Professor Stephen Jones in Irvine, California.

I was standing only approximately one and a half feet from him when he said

this. The only guys I know who have this stuff are the golden boys at the Army's

Redstone Arsenal.

So who controlled the super military grade nano anthrax in the anthrax

According to the world's foremost independent investigator of the anthrax

attacks, Barry Kissin, who is an attorney in the Washington, D .C. area,

the answer is Battelle Memorial Institute, which is a U .S. government

intelligence lab and the CIA and possibly also the Defense Intelligence

the Army. There's the Army again, Dugway Proving Ground.

And I learned.

from my research, that William Patrick, who is now deceased, he was one of the U

.S. government's top bioweapons experts, used to work at Fort Detrick also, that

William Patrick held the private trade secret, one should ask why private, the

private trade secret to the process to create the one trillion spores per gram

anthrax that was found in the letters.

Who could handle military -grade explosives and anthrax?

that were found in the World Trade Center dust and the anthrax letters.

Once they have been created, I would think it would take a military special

operators, black ops, trained in super weaponized nanoparticles to set nano

explosives and deliver nanobiological weapons.

This would be a highly trained, highly specialized black joint special

operations team, I would think, like in particular the Joint Special Operations

Command, JSOC, and that works hand in glove with the CIA Special Activities

Division,

We learn from New York Times articles, operate above the law with exemption to

execute covert operations by the United States on behalf of the president.

In that time, of course, the president was George W. Bush.

But as we'll see, JSOC was actually overseen by Vice President Cheney.

The Joint Forces Command also happens to script, plan, and run the military's

exercises and war games.

And we have seen that on the morning of 9 -11, they were running NORAD Northeast

Sector, which was responsible for not responding, that the NORAD Northeast

Sector was running a hijack scenario exercise on the morning of 9 -11 itself.

And the FAA hijack coordinator on 9 -11, who should have been at his desk, Army

Lieutenant General Michael Canavan, guess what he'd done just before that?

headed JSOC.

When Canavan first took the job, only about nine months before 9 -11, he began

running and participating in military exercises that, according to FAA

Intelligence Division analyst John Hawley, quote, pretty damn close to the

plot itself.

And on the morning of 9 -11, Canavan's whereabouts were, quote, unknown, and

9 -11 Commission didn't consider it important enough to ask where he was.

Under whose command is JSOC?

According to Cy Hurst, Vice President Cheney oversaw the Joint Special

Operations Command before and on 9 -11.

And Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and forming top Army

Green Beret, there's the Army again, Robert Andrews, reportedly, according to

Alternative Press, headed Cheney's blackest dark ops under JSOC.

Susan Lindauer has sworn under oath that before 9 -11, her CIA handler ordered

her to threaten Iraq's U .N. ambassador that if they didn't turn over

intelligence about imminent hijack plots with airplanes, i .e. like the 9 -11

plot, that the U .S. would bomb their country, and that this threat came from,

quote, higher than the CIA director and the Secretary of State, which could only

mean the Secretary of Defense, Vice President Cheney, or President Bush.

Stephen Piznick, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State to three U .S.

presidents, has stated publicly that he is willing to name under oath to the

proper venue the military general who was on Deputy Secretary of Defense's

Wolfowitz staff on 9 -11 who told him that the 9 -11 attacks were a false flag

attack. Quote, they ran the attacks, the general said, of Wolfowitz, Cheney,

Cheney's aide Hadley, Elliot Abrams, Condoleezza Rice, among others.

How did they do it?

I believe the evidence shows that 9 -11 was a red, white, and blue smoke and

mirrors preemptive self -attack, planned and executed under cover of hijacked

scenario exercises, onto which the neocon high cabal, headed by Wolfowitz,

Cheney, and Rumsfeld, planned and orchestrated the overlay of inside -the

-building explosives to ensure its spectacular success, a la the Reichstag

while also taking out targeted offices and functions, i .e. the Naval Command

Center and the Army auditors who were trying to track the $2 .3 trillion that

Rumsfeld had acknowledged.

We cannot track $2 .3 trillion.

The day before 9 -11 was allegedly missing.

NORAD's Northeast Sector Operational Commander on 9 -11, Colonel Bob Marr,

happens to be an expert in red team gaming verisimilitude.

Verisimilitude is a fancy word for making an exercise or war game seem

There's no better way to make it seem real than to make it real, is it? To go

live.

He was an expert in red team gaming verisimilitude and has publicly

that his northeast NORAD sector was conducting hijacked scenario emergency

response exercises on the morning of 9 -11 itself. It's in this book, Touching

History.

Richard Clark revealed to me in an interview I did with him at the Naval

Postgraduate School as the senior military affairs journalist there on

30th, 2010, and I published this on DOD's website.

He said that the White House clears every major exercise, as I mentioned

meaning Condoleezza Rice and probably Cheney and Bush and certainly Cheney.

would have known about those hijacked scenario exercises being run on the

morning of 9 -11, which were then used as part of the pretext for why NORAD

didn't respond in time.

White House approval of hijacked scenario exercises being run on 9 -11

would have to have been known about and approved by at least Rice and Clark.

JSOC NORAD exercise scenario planners and executors were the core, I believe,

the operational plot.

Why? NORAD, which is an Air Force agency, lied at least twice and probably

times to Congress as well as the 9 -11 Commission, putting out three

contradictory timelines of its non -responses of its fighter jets in time.

And the 9 -11 Commission seriously considered referring NORAD DOD to the

Department of Justice for criminal investigation for lying and obstruction

justice.

9 -11, in my very educated opinion, was not just an evil inside plot. It was a

diabolical. Whose purpose was, in my opinion, to terrorize the United States

into putting Israel's interests above our own.

I call that treason.

To get the United States military into the Middle East, as Nicholas Rockefeller

told Rousseau a year before 9 -11.

This was a longtime goal of the Project for New American Century U .S. and

Israeli Zionists.

To affect Israel's goals using American blood and treasure, which is still

happening.

CENTCOM, which stands for Central Command, the Central Combatant Command

United States military of the Pentagon, had already before 9 -11 been moved to

the Middle East.

You would think that CENTCOM would be centered over the United States. Well,

of the reasons for that is, as you have already learned, there was no combatant

command over the mainland United States until immediately after 9 -11 when they

created NORTHCOM for that very purpose.

Reported dual Israeli U .S. citizen Paul Wolfowitz was Deputy Secretary of

Defense, number two immediately under Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.

Richard Perle, reported dual U .S. Israeli citizen, proclaimed himself one

the top Project for a New American Century manifesto signatories. He self

-proclaimed himself the Prince of Darkness.

And he chaired Rumsfeld's Defense Policy Board.

If Richard Perle is the Prince of Darkness, Dov Zakheim is the king.

Dov Zakheim is a rabbi and reported dual U .S.-Israeli citizen.

He wrote a paper advocating a stage catastrophic event to force the United

States into war to reconfigure the Middle East in Israel's interest and

presented it to the Project for New American Century before they wrote the

Project for New American Century manifesto.

Zachheim is credited with the actual New Pearl Harbor quote in that manifesto.

Zachheim headed all of the Pentagon's accounts as its DOD comptroller under

Rumsfeld, as the $2 .3 trillion was announced being missing the day before 9

on September 10th.

CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer says it was really $9 .1 trillion and that it

had gone for Israel.

Pentagon auditors tracking the missing money, killed on 9 -11 by inside

explosives in the Pentagon, and the records were destroyed.

Zachheim was the chief executive officer of Systems Planning Corporation, a

defense contractor that specialized in remote control of airplanes, especially

drone aircraft, used in U .S. military exercises.

and a special system which destroyed them in their terminal phases.

This is what the evidence shows actually happened at the Pentagon on 9 -11.

Systems Planning Corporation had a subsidiary that actually oversaw the

1993 World Trade Center One attack, so -called investigation, and through that

investigation obtained the secret World Trade Center blueprints.

which were needed to know where to plant controlled demolition explosives

throughout the building.

Dov Zakheim arranged for the Pentagon to receive leased converted Boeing

767 fuel tanker planes, which are consistent with what eyewitnesses saw

of the plane that actually struck World Trade Center 2 on 9 -11.

Reported dual Israeli U .S. citizen Philip Zelikow headed the 9 -11

cover -up as its executive director.

Reported dual U .S. Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff headed the Department

Justice alleged, quote, investigation, which is a cover -up of 9 -11, and

the second new Department of Homeland Security director.

So we must ask, whose homeland and whose security?

The insider 9 -11 plot.

was the highest evil because it was premeditated.

It was based on a Hitlerian scale big lie.

We have seen that not just the whole official story of 9 -11 is a lie, but

single individual part of it is a lie.

The 9 -11 plot was designed to kill masses of our innocent fellow citizens.

It was designed to falsely blame and demonize Muslims who could not have done

and did not do it.

It was created to justify the invasion of their lands in the Middle East for

geopolitical power, oil, and Israel's interests.

The aggressive 9 -11 wars that have killed hundreds of thousands, displaced

millions, and cost our country trillions.

are based entirely on lies and are the highest crime under international law

the Nuremberg Principles, which we wrote as the victors over the Nazis in World

War II.

So what is the source of this high evil?

Incredibly, it is the mentality of Nazism.

So who and what are the neocons, really?

The 9 -1 -1 Pentagon neocons.

Wolfowitz, Prince of Darkness himself, Richard Perle, Shalabi, Khalidzad,

were all students and are followers of neocon chief philosopher

Leo Strauss. They all studied under Professor Strauss at the University of

Chicago.

And Professor Strauss' ideology is even more extremist than his personal mentor

and sponsor in Germany, Hitler's own legal theorist, Karl Schmitt.

The Schmitt -Strauss doctrine is that the state needs enemies and must create

them if necessary and must fabricate lies for the many, for the people, while

its leaders, quote, embrace the darkness, unquote.

We also have to work the sort of the dark side, if you will. We've got to

time in the shadows.

Leo Strauss taught that, quote, those who are fit to rule are those who

there is no morality and that there is only one so -called natural right, the

right of the superior man to rule over the inferior.

This is from Leo Strauss in The American Right, a book published about Strauss's

so -called philosophy in 1997.

Leo Strauss' neocons literally brainstormed the attacks of 9 -11

those attacks.

Attorney Stanley Hilton studied under Leo Strauss with Paul Wolfowitz and

Richard Pearl at the University of Chicago.

Hilton's senior thesis under Strauss detailed a plan to establish a

dictatorship in the United States using a fabricated Pearl Harbor -like incident

as its justification.

Stanley Hilton, Richard Pearl, Paul Wolfowitz, Leo Strauss, and others

an array of different plots and incidents like September 11th and flying

airplanes into buildings way back in the 1960s.

And note that the book that Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, passed

hundreds of copies of,

Shortly before the 9 -11 attacks was the 1962 book by top neocon Roberto

Wolfstetter.

The 9 -11 neocon's mentor's mentor, therefore, was Hitler's own justifier of

evil, Nazi Karl Schmitt.

This is a quote from Professor Francis Boyle, an internationally renowned

professor of international law at the University of Illinois.

Quote, Schmitt was the most notorious Nazi law professor of his day,

justifying every atrocity the Nazis inflicted on everyone.

We're talking about the Holocaust.

We must understand that these so -called neoconservatives are, in fact, neo

-Nazis. They espouse the Nazi doctrine of Schmitt and Strauss and Machiavelli

and Nietzsche, the doctrine of the Superman, unquote.

This is what internationally acclaimed journalist Seymour Hersh had to say.

Quote, we, that is the United States, has been taken over basically by a cult.

Eight or nine neoconservatives, we've seen they're really neo -Nazis in their

mentality, have somehow grabbed the U .S. government.

Just how and why they did it so efficiently, we'll have to wait for much

historians and for better documentation than we have now.

but they managed to overcome the federal bureaucracy and the Congress and the

press with the greatest of ease.

This does say something about how fragile our democracy is, unquote.

Lawrence Wilkerson, who was chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell

the Bush -Cheney administration, about this same coup said, it's not a coup,

it's worse.

This is how retired four -star U .S. Army General and top NATO commander,

Clark, put it in a 2003 public address at the Commonwealth Club in San

Francisco.

What happened in 9 -11 is we didn't have a strategy, we didn't have bipartisan

agreement, we didn't have American understanding of it, and we had instead

policy coup in this country. A coup.

A policy coup.

Some hard -nosed people took over the direction of American policy, and they

never bothered to inform the rest of us.

Then I came back to the Pentagon. About six weeks later, I saw the same officer.

I said, why haven't we attacked Iraq? Are we still going to attack Iraq? He

said, oh, sir, it's worse than that.

He said, he pulled up a piece of paper off his desk. He said, I just got this

memo from the Secretary of Defense's office that says we're going to attack.

and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years.

We're going to start with Iraq, and then we're going to move to Syria, Lebanon,

Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.

I sat on this information for a long time, for about six or eight months. I

so stunned by this, I couldn't begin to talk about it.

And I couldn't believe it would really be true, but that's actually what

happened.

These people took control of the policy in the United States.

And I realized then it came back to me, a 1991 meeting I had with Paul

Wolfowitz. You know, in 2001, he was deputy secretary of defense, but in

he was the undersecretary of defense for policy. It's the number three position

in the Pentagon.

It was a pretty stunning thing. You mean the purpose of the military is to start

wars and change governments? It's not to sort of deter conflict?

We're going to invade countries. And, you know, my mind was spinning.

And I put that aside. It was like a nugget that you hold on to.

This country was taken over by a group of people with a policy coup.

Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld and you could

name a half dozen other collaborators from the Project for a New American

Century. They wanted us.

to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our

control.

It went back to those comments in 1991.

Now, did anybody ever tell you that?

Was there a national dialogue on this? Did senators and congressmen stand up

denounce this plan?

Was there a full -fledged American debate on it? Absolutely not. And there

isn't. The truth is...

Our government was and still is penetrated and controlled by a Zionist

fifth column that took over the White House, the Congress, the military

-civilian superstructure, key military officers and intelligence personnel, and

the mainstream media leading up to, on, and after 9 -11.

The level and extent of this penetration is unprecedented in the history of the

world and amounts to a literal invasion by an un -American and hostile force.

The same year, 2003, that General Wesley Clark gave that warning that the United

States government's civilian superstructure of the military, key

officers and special operators and intelligence personnel had been taken

an Israeli neocon fifth column coup, Israel's own prime minister, Ariel

frustrated that his Middle East destabilization and domination plan

as well and as quickly as planned, declared that the United States had

compromised. Remember Bush's famous false and absurd premature mission

accomplished speech from the deck of a Navy ship that same year, 2003?

Ariel Sharon went on that it was time that the U .S. marched against Libya,

Syria, and Iran.

Note that President Obama has made Sharon's Libya demand already a reality.

that the U .S. is now destabilizing Syria by supporting none other than al

-Qaeda -affiliated Syrian so -called rebels, and that the war drums are

now for an attack on Iran.

I do not believe it is a coincidence that the same lead actor who played in

movie Pearl Harbor, Ben Affleck, that prepared the ground for the American

public to accept the, quote, new Pearl Harbor, unquote, meme for the inside job

9 -11 attacks, just happens to be the producer, director, and leading actor of

the new movie Argo, a transparent piece of Hollywood CIA propaganda which is

intended to...

demonize Iran, and prepare the American public to now accept a war against that

final nation in the neocons' quickly falling row of Middle East dominoes.

Facts alone are not enough. Our 9 -11 truth movement, I believe, needs to

the heart and soul, maybe the main impetus of a global truth force

Mahatma Gandhi actually initiated precisely such a movement in India,

called Truth Force or Satyagraha, on, coincidentally, September 11th.

And this was pointed out by one of the speakers, I believe, from India.

at an extremely important event that just happened this past November 19,

at which Richard Gage was the speaker, Michael Chosodowski was the speaker,

Cynthia McKinney was the speaker, and individuals from all around the world

speakers. It's on YouTube. It was a conference that was called Revisiting 9

that was orchestrated and hosted by the former prime minister of Malaysia.

And in the audience were, they said, 30 ambassadors from 30 different countries

around the world.

And at that, I believe it was the Indian speaker who mentioned how important it

was that Gandhi's Satya Graha movement started on September 11th and that we

need to turn the 9 -11 truth movement into a worldwide truth movement to stop

these secrets that they only get by with their evil because they have

unnecessary secrecy.

So how can our reality -based community, as George Bush and Karl Rove called us,

as opposed to the lie -based community, how can we prevail over the power and

the lie -based community?

We need to unite the facts with the force, the satyagraha of the truth.

And we do that as individual citizens.

We have the power within ourselves to officialize the truth every single day

because credibility is a zero -sum game.

We need to take the oath of telling the truth into our own hands.

And you do that in a very simple way. You can take sworn jurid affidavits.

You don't have to be a notary public to do so, but I recommend that every single

one of us in the worldwide truth movement become, for a few dollars and a

bit of training, to become notary publics so that we can take sworn jurid

affidavits. And most people don't know it, but in California, at least, where I

live,

A notary public, when a notary public notarizes a document, it becomes an

official state of California document.

So because credibility is a zero -sum game, if you have the lie, the people,

insiders who did the job and have covered it up with the lie, they have a

and they have credibility.

But as we increase our credibility by officializing the truth and getting

witness testimonies, as I did with April Gallup, under oath,

And then doing the transcript and getting a sworn jurid affidavit making

an official state document, those can be used in court. And we need to do that

with every single one of the witnesses that have already come forward. It's a

simple thing to do. When I did my book, when I was researching my book, October

Surprise,

I was trying to, I, nothing had changed.

I had all the same evidence like I'm showing you here, but I hadn't

it yet.

And nobody would, they would pay attention. They would say, oh, that's

nice. Yes, I agree with you. And nothing would happen in the real world. The

rubber wasn't meeting the road in terms of politics or the law.

And one day I had the idea, well, what the heck? You know, I have a friend

a notary public, Betty Phillips in Pacific Grove, California. I'm going to

take my statement of what I experienced in the Reagan campaign and about the

October surprise, the truth behind the Iran side of Iran -Contra, I'm going to

take that in and I'm going to type it up and I'm going to have her swear me up

and do a sworn jurid affidavit.

And when I did that, it was like people's mental doors opened up.

The Democratic Party officialdom, it went all the way to the top.

And pretty soon there was a full subpoena power congressional

the House of Representatives.

We need to officialize the truth, and we do that in a worldwide pro -truth

movement, and we need to do that under the Aegis and umbrella of

Mahatma Gandhi's Satyagraha movement.

Where are we now?

I'm just going to very briefly review the major 9 -11 truth events of the past

year and how we lay the evidential groundwork to bring the real

justice.

Interestingly, even though the Pentagon attack has been kind of the black sheep

of the 9 -11 truth movement, which, for reasons that are pretty clear to me, at

the beginning of my talk I told you why it's the most important part of the 9

-11 attacks.

and therefore the real perpetrators would not want the 9 -11 Truths Movement

go there.

And many people in the 9 -11 Truths Movement even said, well, we shouldn't

at the Pentagon attack. There's too much controversy.

Some people say it was a North Pass, South Pass, so we shouldn't go there.

Well, even despite this,

amazingly, because I focus on the Pentagon attack and have for over 11

was the only invited expert witness to testify at both the Toronto 9 -11

hearings and the Vancouver 9 -11 hearings, which is a small miracle,

force is with us.

It truly is.

And then, of course, I mentioned the Malaysia conference.

By the way, the Toronto hearings, this is very important.

This is the 911 Toronto report.

It just came out, I believe, last November.

Every single American should own this document.

This report is my paper on the Pentagon attack. It's Chapter 13.

And there are chapters in here by all of the expert witnesses at Toronto.

And this cover was intentionally designed by James Gourley, who is the

the report and who sponsored the Toronto hearings, which were on the 10th

anniversary in Toronto, Canada. He intentionally designed the cover so that

distance it would look identical to the 9 -11 Commission report.

So if you just hold up the 9 -11 Commission report, the 571 -page lie,

hold up the truth by the 9 -11 Truth Movement.

So please get this, read it. It is incredibly revealing, and it shows the

of the evidence that we have already produced, which was the whole point of

Malaysia conference that was sponsored by the former prime minister of

held on the, I think, the day the 9 -11 Toronto report came out.

So also you should know that one of the four judges, they were called the

panelists, like a panel of judges,

to whom we gave our testimony at Toronto on the 10th anniversary of 9 -11.

One of the four judges, called panelists, was the Chief Justice of the

Court of Italy, and he is to this day the Honorary Chief Justice of the

Court of Italy and the President, as I recall, and also a title of the Supreme

Court of Italy.

And so this is an extremely important and serious time when we have reached,

9 -11 Truth Movement has reached a critical mass of evidence, including

evidence now being taken under Jared Affidavit's sworn testimony, which did

happen at Jim Fetzer's Vancouver hearings. All of the testimony was taken

under oath.

At the Malaysia conference, and, oh, I should mention,

former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Italy, who is one of the

judges at the Toronto hearings. He has the final chapter in this 911 Toronto

report, and he has gone public stating, including here, that it is his intent to

take it to the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, and it

doesn't really matter.

that to this point the United States is not a signatory to the jurisdiction of

the court because some 80 innocent victims of some 80 countries, most of

are signatories of the International Criminal Court and therefore have

jurisdiction, can bring this matter before the International Criminal Court,

that includes Italy, his country. The greatest accountability opportunity of

all, in my opinion, is the upcoming 9 -11 Guantanamo trial.

Believe it or not, as I was on the airplane coming here, which was on

10th, so I was reading the New York Times of January 10th about what

the day before, January 9th, a few days ago, the chief prosecutor of the

Guantanamo Military Tribunal announced Wednesday, January 9th, that he is

abandoning terrorism conspiracy charges against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the

other 9 -11 -5.

Why is that important?

Why is that incredibly important?

Why does it matter so greatly for our truth movement?

The 9 -11 truth movement, as I and others have shown, has proven that

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other 9 -11 -5 may have conspired and plotted

something like the 9 -11 attacks, it is physically impossible that they were the

actual perpetrators or executors of those attacks.

And therefore,

The chief prosecutor of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the 9 -11 Five has just

out the only charge that they could possibly be found guilty of under the

leaving only what they could never be found guilty of, which is the actual

This is extremely important, and the 9 -11 Truth Movement, I believe, needs to

get this report as well as sworn affidavits as soon as possible to the

attorneys of the 9 -11 Five.

And in conclusion,

The 9 -11 truce movement, and we the citizens, we the people, must never give

up. If we don't, because this is a zero -sum game, we will eventually win, and

the real perpetrators will be brought to justice.

Thank you.

We're now going to go to the Q &As, so just please come to the mic and one of

the two and ask your question, and I'll do my best to answer it. My name is Dick

McManus. I'm a retired counterintelligence agent from the U .S.

really agree with everything you said.

I'd like to point out that the flash you saw of one of your photographs It had

to be an explosive flash. It couldn't have been a regular fire.

That's the first time I've ever seen that photo.

He's talking about the still photo on the side of the building that I thought

might be thermite. Yes, explosive. I don't think it can be from an impact of

plane. Right. It's more like a flash from an explosion versus a fire.

That was a really interesting thing. And that's why I said at that point that I

believe.

I brought that slide out right after showing you the graphic from the

building performance report showing that there was this massive explosion inside

the first floor in the building that forced the floor of the second floor up.

Yeah, that was a very lucky photograph that I caught at that right time. I'd

just like to point out there were seven fake terrorist alerts after 9 -11.

They were all kind of coincide to the vote on the Patriot Act right after,

previously prior to the election, the second election of Bush.

And also those anthrax letters went to the two senators who were resisting the

Patriot Act.

I was interested to ask you, do you know that

nanoaluminum is a controlled substance?

That makes up nanothermite? Yes. Have you looked into, is there any records of

who had access to nanoaluminum, which is a component, a necessary component in

order to make nanothermite? That's a very good question. I haven't personally

because that's been a World Trade Center question, but I know that Kevin Ryan

has addressed that issue in one of his published articles. I would recommend

read. Do you know how much time it took? Before the alleged FBI came and

confiscated the videotapes from the... It was almost instant.

I mean, do you have a...

You know, like instant really gets you suspicious. No, almost, almost.

What we do know, for instance, at the Citgo gas station, and as I understand

this is interesting, the Citgo gas station, I believe, was owned by

the time, by Hugo Chavez.

I find that interesting.

But in any case, according to the person who managed or owned that station, I

don't know which, the FBI arrived.

almost immediately, I think he said five minutes, something like that, at the

Sitco gas station, and didn't even take the time to go up on a ladder or

something and take out the film. They just ripped the whole camera off the

And they were doing that around the area.

And you don't know how much time it took them to get from their FBI office to

the... They were already on the scene.

But the excuse or pretext they give for already being on the scene, including

there were Secret Service agents already on the scene, is that before the

attacks they were expecting the president to arrive between noon and

Very convenient.

They had to be passengers.

Barbara Olson was quite well known, and her husband even more so probably.

And they had to be relatives and friends.

of passengers.

So what happened to passengers, you know, supposedly, I mean, there should

whole group of people that want to know what happened to my, whoever was

supposedly on Flight 77.

Right. Well, we don't know, number one.

Number two, the Bureau of Transportation... BTS database, which is

states that Flight 77 was not scheduled to even take off on the morning of 9 -11

as a civilian airline flight.

So we have open questions as to what happened to the passengers. It's an

extremely important question. I do not know the answer to it.

There should be some kind of history of people going to the airport.

There has to be a manifest somewhere.

Dozens of supposedly passengers. Yes. It is interesting. It is very important, I

think, that the Pentagon's own official autopsy report states that there

was no Arab DNA in any of the remains from the Pentagon attack, either on the

alleged plane or inside the building.

Well, the official story says that Arab hijackers were in the plane.

Let's put it this way. If the official story is anywhere close to being true,

and I've already demonstrated that whatever was destroyed at the Pentagon

the Heliport five minutes or more before, the official story says Flight

even close to the building, there apparently were not passengers in that

at all. I believe that...

If Flight 77 took off with Barbara Olson and anyone else in it, any real

passengers, that it either crashed or was landed shortly after it was seen by

Indianapolis Air Traffic Control to lose approximately 6 ,000 feet before it

lost its transponder signal.

So it probably went down somewhere close to the tri -border area of Ohio,

Kentucky, and West Virginia.

Okay. When did you first begin to question the official story?

When I first started to question the official story, well, that's an

question.

I want to preface that with a context, and that is I started to question

the official story of the release of the 52 hostages in Iran

the moment that they were released as Reagan took his oath of office.

And that resulted in my book, October Surprise.

And I actually questioned 9 -11 as we weren't being told the whole story

on the day of 9 -11 itself.

And the red flags went up when I saw on my split screen, I don't remember which

mainstream television channel it was, with Bush still sitting in the classroom

looking like a deer in the headlights as the other split screens.

showed Americans jumping to their deaths from the Twin Towers. There was

something terribly wrong with this split picture.

And from that moment on, I dedicated myself to finding out the truth and

bringing the real perpetrators to justice.

My question has to do with...

The large -scale operation, this whole thing must be, you know, in the pre

-planning, the wiring of the buildings, you know, of the various part of this

whole operation that would involve hundreds if not thousands of people, you

know. And I can understand, you know, in a military mentality, the need to know

and the compartmentalized information is really important. And I can see how

people can be.

Well, instructed to do certain things, like, for example, the light poles being

down. Somebody had to put it there. You know, it didn't happen by itself.

And also being that, and I can see how this thing happened, and perhaps to a

of these people surprised that this had happened after the fact.

My question to you is, you work with a lot, I mean, you were a government

employee, and you work with a lot of military people. Yes.

I have to believe that most of these people are good people. They are.

Yeah. And my point is, like, well, where are they now? And how do they sleep?

And how do they keep silent over this whole thing? There's got to be thousands

of people out there who know almost as much as you do.

Yes. Well, first off, you're talking about what's called OPSEC, operational

security, in a highly compartmented black operation.

And you don't get to be a black operator at that level.

unless you follow orders, no matter what. And you know that if you talk, you

dead, and maybe your family's dead, too.

And then, on the other hand, people say, well, how could they keep it secret?

They kept the Manhattan Project secret, with far more people than that, number

one. Number two, how could my government do this? They did it at Pearl Harbor,

the original Pearl Harbor. That's why they wanted a new Pearl Harbor, if you

really know the history of Pearl Harbor.

Pearl Harbor, if you read the book by Dennett.

Day of Deceit.

Be sure and get the most up -to -date edition of Day of Deceit, and in

particular in the back, because as he was about to publish Day of Deceit, the

first edition, the National Archives, he had done an FOIA request to the

National Archives for proof that Roosevelt and Churchill and the high

the Navy knew that the attack at Pearl Harbor was coming. Now, in that case,

there was a real enemy.

But that attack was protected, and the high -asset carriers were moved out of

Pearl Harbor.

The others were ordered to remain there as sitting ducks, the Arizona and the

other ships.

And Admiral Kimmel, who was the chief admiral at Pearl Harbor, was explicitly,

the orders were given not to tell him of the intelligence that was already known

from breaking the Purple Code.

by the magic machines.

So we know that Pearl Harbor, like the Raksag fire, if you will, was a

attack by an enemy that was desired to happen for larger

geopolitical goals.

And so it's 9 -11.

Yeah, but I see that perhaps a difference in Pearl Harbor is that, you

were... we were led to believe that we have a common enemy being the Japanese

and the Nazi.

It was a true enemy. Yeah, it was a true enemy. And whereas 9 -11, we really

want to create fear to make this fictitious enemy so we can keep pouring

into this whole machine. Well, 9 -11, after 9 -11, what we have done in the

of the 9 -11 lie has created a real enemy.

It didn't exist before, I don't believe.

Yeah, and then, you know, I guess...

The point is the result is the American people losing our civil liberties. Yes.

You know, we've created this Gestapo -like organization.

Homeland Security Department. Yeah, exactly.

So everybody is seeing the effect of what happened. Correct.

You know, with 9 -11. So these guys, these friends of yours, they must be

They're not my friends.

Well, I mean. Sorry.

Shouldn't that be obvious?

You've got to have friends in there who are not, who are losing sleep over there

still. No, well, they're not my friends, and I don't know anyone close. I've

never signed any classification agreement ever. I would never do that. I

public journalist.

No, they're not my friends.

Well, there's got to be a lot of people who have conscience that would be still

part of that. Well, there are people with consciences who have spoken to me.

I've given you the quotes for many of them at a very high level.

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for heaven's sakes, has gone

with information that proves the official story is a lie.

Thank you. Go ahead.

The way the plane came in, besides how far it got or close to the building, it

flew over a highway, a major highway.

Weren't there people who saw what kind of plane it was who were traveling on

highway at that time?

And, of course, if the...

Your point of the explosions further in the building or other kinds of

explosions to get the plane to line up with where that would happen would take

very good pilot to do that.

And so the question I would have is, or two, didn't people see this plane who

were driving on the highway look like?

And what's said about how a terrorist pilot could line up and even fly into

Pentagon that way?

I've just shown you that a terrorist pilot did not fly into the Pentagon,

one. Number two, the official story path is not the way the plane came.

And it wasn't Flight 77 to begin with. It was a white plane that was formed and

painted to simulate an American Airlines plane.

And, yes, many witnesses did see it.

And after the official story was put out, assumed that it was Flight 77.

Yes. You showed, during your presentation, you showed a photograph of

explosion after the impact, and I just wondered if you knew. A possible

thermite. It was an explosion. It's a possible thermite. Okay. I wondered if

knew what the source was and whether or not there's more CATV.

photographs of the actual incident available.

Right. There are only two videotapes that the government claims exist at all,

and that's under oath by the FBI analyst who looked at all 85 that the FBI says

they have.

There are only two, and they were almost identical videotapes from the two

outside cameras, from the security cameras, and all they show is an

They do not show a plane.

That is the only video. The only photograph of the explosion we have is

photograph that I showed you that appears to be an explosion.

It may or may not be the same explosion. It probably is, but we don't know for

sure.

You've shown who the people are that you believe are actually pulling the

trigger on all of this. The question is, who is behind...

these people and what's their ultimate goal?

Does this work its way all the way into a one -world government business and all

that? I think at the beginning I made clear who I think is behind it. It is

signatories of the Project for a New American Century, and in turn behind

are people like the Rockefellers, the Council on Foreign Relations. The World

Trade Center towers were built and owned by the Rockefellers, and I believe that

they were built to be brought down.

And Rockefeller, David Rockefeller himself was asked, you can see it, I

that you can actually see it on a video, but if not, certainly the quote, it's a

public quote.

He was asked, he said words to the effect, you know, I've been accused of

wanting a one world government and being willing to do anything to get it.

And then after some more verbiage, he said, well, if that's what I'm accused

I'm proud to say that it's true.

Words to that effect.

This was necessary, I believe, in order to justify after the fall of

the Soviet Union, after the fall of the wall, and when they were allegedly a

unipolar power before the rise of China and other...

as they call them, peer competitors or potential adversaries in the military, I

believe that that was the time that the people behind the Project for a New

American Century, and they even say so, that they believe that they should

strike while the iron was hot, as it were, and have some kind of a pretext, a

new Pearl Harbor, to justify an American century. It was called Project for a

New American Century, to have a global domination.

Yeah, I've thought ever since about a week after 9 -11 happened that it was an

inside job, and I certainly agree with you on that.

And I think it was done in order to get us ready for protracted

war in the Middle East, which we've had now. We've been in Afghanistan for 12

years now, and now they're thinking about it, we will get out soon,

going to go back to sleep and say everything was fine.

But the thing is, sometimes it is necessary to go to war, and it's very

get the public of this country to do that, which is why... That's why Pearl

Harbor was protected.

Why, you know, they let Pearl Harbor happen so that we go to war. Facilitated

Pearl Harbor to happen.

And they can manufacture this Tonkin Gulf incident to get us into Vietnam.

Yes. Now, after Vietnam, nobody wanted to even hear about war anymore.

Right. But now after...

After 9 -11, people were hot. Let's go get those bastards.

But that was the whole point. Okay, but the thing is, okay, so why is all this

being done? And one thing that's not mentioned very often is that there's one

little habit we have in this country called driving around in cars, which is

using something like 30 % of the world's oil production. We're only 4 % of the

world's population.

How do we get away with that?

terrorizing everybody else into letting us have it.

That's what I think is going on. So I'd like you to comment on that.

Well, Michael Rupert's book, Crossing the Rubicon, would be what I would

recommend that you read on precisely that. By the way, chapters 19 and 20 on

war games are based upon my work, for which he credits me as coming up with a

holy grail of 9 -11 research, that the realization that the war games and

emergency response exercises on 9 -11 were on hijack scenarios.

That's a very important book, but the vast majority of the book, of course, is

his proposal that the powers that be in the United States and NATO countries,

especially Britain, saw or believed that peak oil was coming, and if it hadn't

already come. It's not clear that it has come, but if they believed that it had

come, that they wanted to be in a position with troops on the ground in

Middle East to control the movement of fossil fuels.

These flights, I didn't believe until last year that these flights were not

real. And I've become convinced in the last year that these flights...

have been fake. Last year, there was Professor Fetzer who came to town. And

was threatened when he was going to give his presentation.

And they had to put it in a little church in U District. Yes, I remember,

before the Vancouver hearing. For a small thing.

And he has come up with this theory.

Because I was suspicious from the beginning, because how did these planes,

you see it in the film, even on the World Trade Center buildings, how did

planes cut through the World Trade Center, which is concrete like butter?

Well, it didn't.

I want to go on record that I have a completely different point of view than

Professor Fetzer on the World Trade Center towers. There was at least a real

plane that impacted World Trade Center 2. I've interviewed witnesses who were

physically on the ground on the sidewalk, saw it go over, hit, and

plane almost killed them.

So just because you have proof that some of the videotapes of World Trade Center

impacts were faked, in whole or in part, tells you nothing about what happened

there. Right.

It doesn't rule out a plane impact at all. Okay, two more questions.

Okay, you had the point of following the money, right, and that like $3 .5

trillion was missing?

2 .3. Okay, whatever.

A lot of money? Uh -huh. What happened to that? Yeah, that's up. Okay, and I

that, you know, the people who were auditing that were blown up, but he

the money was gone, right? What happened about that? No, they said they couldn't

account for it. Well, okay, they couldn't account for it, so that just

disappeared when they blew up the accounting?

Okay, I address that very in great detail in my forthcoming book, which

have the same title as this presentation behind the smoke curtain.

I address it in detail, and it's a complicated question.

But one of the things that I have discovered is that that very office, the

Command Center, which was, I mean, one of the witnesses there, an exact quote

was that this looked like a bombed -out office.

And according to the official story, sole survivor of the Naval Command

which is two and three rings in.

Kevin Schaefer, he stated that the explosion went off there at precisely 9

According to the official Pentagon building performance report, the alleged

Flight 77 hit at 9 .37 and 46 seconds, almost 9 .38, and had gone

completely through the building through the Naval Command Center in less than

one second. So by 9 .37 and 47 seconds.

So you've got many, many minutes before Kevin Schaefer says a bomb.

He doesn't say bomb, but he says there was an explosion there, and it was

described as a bombed -out office space.

So why is that important?

It's important because I've learned that the Naval Command Center was not only

almost certainly part of Able Danger.

which was tracking the hijackers prior to 9 -11, almost a year and a half,

including three of the four cells that were allegedly involved.

They had records of that there. Those records were destroyed of not only that,

but I learned that there was something called the Black Eagle Fund that was

allegedly $240 billion that was controlled by the Central Intelligence

Agency and almost certainly by George Bush Sr. himself.

that had been used to sabotage the Soviet Union secretly, economically

the Soviet Union, which was one of the main reasons that it fell, and not

because of Osama bin Laden, who was our own CIA asset in Afghanistan, and that

those records, records of that were actually held in the Naval Command

also.

My question is, what is your opinion of the National Defense Authorization Act,

and what is your prediction for the civil liberties in the United States?

What is my opinion of the National Defense Authorization Act? Well, I think

you're talking about the provision of the national.

The provisions.

I think there are two of the National Defense Authorization Act, NDAA, which

just been re -approved by Congress.

that effectively the president is presuming to himself the authority

to kidnap, basically, an American citizen anywhere in the world, including

the United States, hold them without trial, without an attorney, indefinitely

torture them and even kill them.

All constitutionally. This is, of course, absurd.

And it needs to go to the Supreme Court, but only after the Supreme Court

hopefully has...

better mix of progressive versus conservative justices.

Thank you.