Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[Narrator] Construction, heavy machinery,
tight schedules, millions at stake.
What could go wrong?
Everything.
Whether it's faulty equipment, poor design,
human error, or just bad luck,
these are Construction Fails.
In this episode...
There's trouble under the overpass.
[Onlooker 1] Oh, [bleep], oh, [bleep]!
[Onlooker 2] Oh, my god!
[Narrator] Add fuel to a fire and things go up in smoke fast.
Sometimes things go from good to bad in a snap.
This is one astronomical fail.
Ever feel like you're on cloud nine?
That's the appeal of a soaring skyscraper.
But life in the clouds isn't always
what it's cracked up to be.
Building materials-- use the wrong ones,
and no huff, no puff,
the house just comes down.
Ever get that sinking feeling?
The airport in Osaka sure does.
So how on Earth are they fixing it?
Architecture is subjective.
Is this a masterpiece?
Or a master miss?
It's not crystal clear.
Highways.
We love them.
We hate them.
We love to hate them.
They connect our towns, cities, states, even countries,
and get us where we need to go...
eventually.
Most days, we take them for granted.
But when something goes wrong, really wrong, we take notice.
On June 11, 2023,
Philadelphia commuters on Interstate 95
really took notice...
[Commuter 1] Oh, [bleep], be careful!
[Narrator] ...when an overpass bridge of the highway
set ablaze.
[Commuter 2] Oh, [bleep], oh, [bleep]!
[Commuter 3] Oh, my god!
[Narrator] Interstate 95 is one
of the United States' major highways.
Weaving a 1,900-mile path of road
with multiple overpass bridges
from Florida
all the way up to Maine,
connecting 15 states.
The I-95 is a vital artery of the Eastern Seaboard.
Sometimes, arteries get clogged up.
That's what happened when this overpass caught fire.
Detours redirected thousands of daily commuters,
some up to 45 minutes out of their way.
Flooding, construction mistakes,
and overload are some of the leading reasons
why bridges collapse.
But not this one.
It's the load carried under the overpass
that caused this calamity.
A tanker truck, like this one,
carrying 8,500 gallons of gasoline caught fire
beneath the overpass bridge.
The result?
A partial bridge collapse onto the road below.
The I-95 overpass bridge isn't the first to catch fire.
Overpasses catch fire for multiple reasons.
In 2017, an overpass in Atlanta caught fire
after construction materials ignited below it.
Another tanker fire happened in Montreal, Canada,
and on Ohio's State Route 8 in the United States.
But it didn't end with a major bridge collapse like this one.
So what went wrong?
Aren't bridges fireproof?
The short answer: not really.
Most bridges are designed with little to no consideration
for fireproofing.
The United States' design bridge criteria
provides little guidance
on engineering bridges for fire resistance.
America's National Fire Protection Association
does have some guidelines,
but they only apply to bridges over 1,000 feet long.
There are more than half a million bridges
currently in use across the U.S.
And the majority of collapsed overpasses
fall short of 1,000 feet.
The I-95 overpass bridge was built to code,
with little to no consideration of fireproofing,
just like most bridges.
What do we know?
The overpass bridge was built from concrete
supported by steel girders.
Steel typically remains unchanged
until reaching about 600 degrees Fahrenheit.
At 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, it loses 50% of its strength.
At 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit, it melts.
Fires range in heat.
A candle flame burns at about 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit,
a propane torch at 3,400 degrees Fahrenheit
and can rise all the way up
to a scorching 6,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
So what made this fire hot enough to take down a bridge?
We know there was fuel literally added to the fire.
But how much of it?
Tanker trucks can carry
more than 11,000 gallons of gasoline.
The tanker on the I-95 was loaded with 8,500 gallons;
well within its capacity.
Things took a turn for the worse
when the driver turned off the I-95.
A tanker truck, like this one, can be tough to handle
on an off-ramp, where the road curves
and the speed goes down to 25 miles per hour.
There are even truck rollover warning signs.
Although the driver's taken this exact route
at least 30 times that year alone,
on June 11th of 2023, he lost control,
despite being equipped with special features
to prevent tipping, like advanced roll stability sensors
and speed reduction sensors,
the truck tipped
and was engulfed in flames almost immediately.
Once a tanker truck rolls over, all bets are off.
Its aluminum tank can rupture, releasing gas fumes
that can ignite fast and spread even faster.
The truck's diesel tank can meet a similar fate.
Improperly secured seals and hatches
are similarly dangerous.
All of these can lead to gasoline spilling...
lots of it.
Once this highly flammable load offloads and makes its way
to a source of ignition like a hot engine,
it's over.
Investigators discovered that the manhole cover
on the forward tank compartment wasn't fastened properly.
It wasn't fastened at all.
This security image taken at the tanker truck's
final loading station shows the manhole cover was open
when the trailer left the facility.
The fire fueled by gallons of gasoline
pouring out of an open hatch served as an accelerant,
creating a fire hot enough
not only to melt the steel supports of the bridge,
but to fail them altogether, resulting in collapse,
and taking the life of the driver.
The impact of the I-95 incident doesn't go away
with a case closed or a highway cleanup.
When a bridge like this shuts down a section of highway,
it also impacts jobs.
Commercial shipping, retail shopping, deliveries.
It impacts the economy.
When a similar incident in 2003
shut down a portion of the MacArthur Maze
in Oakland, California, the estimated cost
of having the maze out of commission
was in the millions per day.
Mindful of the costs,
the I-95 overpass was back up and running
a mere 12 days later, thanks to fast-acting engineers
who put in a temporary section of bridge
while the permanent bridge continued to be built.
Philly residents eagerly watched the progress live.
It was an engineering feat.
Six lanes of traffic were operational
until permanent work on the bridge was finally completed
in May of 2024.
To answer the biggest questions about our universe,
we have to think big.
Real big.
Radio telescopes are behemoth pieces of technology
that can cover the area of 26 football fields.
Powerful enough to pick up some of the weakest signals
from space, allowing us to study stars, galaxies,
even planets beyond our solar system.
The larger the surface area of the dish,
the more data it collects.
So size is king.
The Arecibo dish was 20 acres.
To get an accurate reading, radio receiver equipment
must be suspended on a giant platform,
hovering over the dish.
Building and maintaining a structure
that can weigh more than 20 tractor trailers in midair
is an astronomical feat itself.
Workers can snap under heavy stress,
and so can cables.
♪ ♪
♪ ♪
♪ ♪
This is what happened in Arecibo, Puerto Rico,
on December 1st of 2020.
The Arecibo Observatory was built in 1963
in a natural concave sinkhole,
nuzzled in the mountains of Puerto Rico.
The secluded location minimized electromagnetic interference
from TV, radio or radar.
And its proximity to the equator offered
an exceptional view of asteroids, comets, and planets.
It was initially commissioned
by America's Department of Defense
to track long-range weapons from the Soviets
during the Cold War.
A few short years later,
the observatory began a more peaceful role
of listening to the stars.
Arecibo's radio telescope became the biggest
and the most powerful radio transmitter on Earth.
It uncovered the first planets outside our solar system
and beamed our first intentional message
to the stars.
It contributed to numerous scientific breakthroughs,
until 900 tons of research equipment came hurtling down.
[Narrator] The Arecibo's unique concave dish
used electromagnetic radiation
to explore space with unparalleled precision.
Suspended above was a platform
housing all radar-receiving equipment.
Three support towers held it all in place using cable.
Lots and lots of cable.
A network of cables ran from each tower
to the suspended platform, to secure it in place.
Additional cables ran from the towers to the ground
anchoring the entire structure.
More than four miles of steel cable was used.
That's more than twice the length
of the Golden Gate Bridge,
which happens to use a similar steel cable system.
With six lanes of traffic and two sidewalks,
rush hour is a stressful time for its drivers and its cables.
But this suspension bridge can handle a hefty load
of more than 200,000 tons.
The cables of the Arecibo were designed
to support the 900-ton load.
But they didn't.
They snapped.
Obliterating the dish and damaging
surrounding observatory buildings.
Miraculously, no one was hurt.
The radio telescope's last transmission
was nothing but a loud crash,
echoing through the Arecibo Valley.
So what went wrong?
The steel cables were strong enough to support
double the weight of the platform.
But what supports the supporting cables?
This type of cable is made up
of over 100 steel wires woven together.
The end of the cable is anchored into a socket.
These wires are fanned out, and molten zinc is poured over top.
Once solidified, those wires are locked in a solid block
within the socket.
They're not going anywhere.
The cable and socket system is widely used in construction
to suspend some of our heaviest structures.
The cable sockets aren't known to fail.
But the cable is known to slip.
A process called zinc creep
is when the zinc inside the socket gets deformed.
This can happen under stress,
and contribute to cables slipping out of their sockets.
During assembly, a certain amount of zinc creep
is accepted, even expected.
But no one expected this.
The domed reflector was a late addition to the Arecibo.
It was installed in 1997
to boost the telescope's capabilities,
weighing in at 110 tons, as much as a blue whale.
That would certainly put a strain on the cables.
But engineers had the foresight to add more cable
to support the extra weight.
In 2017, Hurricane Maria ravaged Puerto Rico, Dominica,
and caused serious damage to several islands
in the Caribbean, taking 4,600 lives in Puerto Rico alone.
Nearly 900 tons of instrumentation
dangling 450 feet in the air seems like an easy target.
For a while, Hurricane Maria seemed like a likely trigger
behind the catastrophic crash at the Arecibo Observatory.
Until 2024, when a committee of experts
finally came to a consensus on the shocking reason
behind the catastrophic collapse.
They think the telescope itself may be to blame
for the zinc creep.
The constant electrical currents
running through the cables and sockets
during the telescope's transmissions
caused the zinc metal that binds the wires to the socket
to loosen.
Once individual wires begin to slip out of the socket,
the outer wires start popping out, one by one.
The weight is no longer equally distributed, and snap.
The electromagnetic radiation that made
the Aricebo radio telescope the most powerful transmitter
in the world also caused its demise.
The catastrophic collapse at the Arecibo Observatory
left a black hole in the astronomical community.
China's Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope,
better known by its acronym, FAST,
was quick to fill that void.
It holds the current world record
as the largest single-dish radio telescope.
Hopefully it doesn't meet the same fate.
[Narrator] Everything is bigger in the Big Apple,
especially the buildings.
New York City is a mecca for some of the world's tallest
and most iconic skyscrapers.
Sticking their skinny necks into Manhattan's
ever-evolving skyline are skyscrapers
that are a new type of tall: super tall,
defined by a minimum height of 984 feet.
Providing breathtaking bird's-eye views
of Central Park, these are the runway models
of New York's real estate market.
Super tall and super thin.
Not to mention, super pricy.
This stretch of Manhattan skyscrapers
is dubbed Billionaire's Row.
And for good reason.
With price tags as high as the buildings,
a condo similar to this one
can go for a steep 23 million U.S. dollars.
For penthouses that look like this,
you're looking at upwards of 100 million.
432 Park Avenue joined Billionaire's Row in 2015.
The 96-story building is a record-breaking
1,396 feet tall.
It quickly became the "it" building.
432 Park Avenue was the tallest residential tower ever built;
not just in New York City, but the Western Hemisphere.
The penthouse was listed for a jaw-dropping
$169 million.
That price tag includes 30,000 square feet
of state-of-the-art amenities
and panoramic views of the city,
thanks to 10-by-10-foot windows that surface the building.
A dream home... on paper.
But as many sky-high condo residents around the world
can attest, when your home is in the clouds,
you gotta expect some turbulence.
Tall towers encounter high winds.
In this case, you better hope what goes up doesn't come down.
Up high in the sky, even the smallest design flaw
can drain your bank account
and roast you on your investment return.
The residents of 432 Park Ave are discovering
that their top-dollar dream home in the clouds
is a little bit of a nightmare.
The condo board is suing the developers
for $125 million in damages,
listing a whopping 1,500
construction and design defects.
So what went wrong?
Skyscrapers are often defined as having more than 40 floors
or a minimum height of 427 feet.
432 Park Avenue is more than three times taller.
In New York City, space goes for a premium; even air space.
And developers found a loophole
to literally make money out of thin air.
Development companies buy up unused air space nearby
and add it on top of their maxed-out lot
to erect wildly tall buildings
with oddly tiny footprints.
432 Park Avenue has
a height-to-width ratio
of 15 to 1.
To put things in perspective, the original World Trade Center
was the tallest building in the world when completed in 1971.
The ratio of its height to base was less than 7 to 1.
New York City's super tall, super slender trend
caught on worldwide.
All of these tall buildings face the same problem: wind.
It's simple: the taller you build,
the more wind you encounter.
The slimmer you build, the more sway you get.
On a typical day, a 1,000-foot-tall tower
might sway a couple of inches.
In 50-mile-per-hour winds,
it can sway as much as half a foot.
In the rare event of 100-mile-per-hour winds,
a building of this height would sway up to two feet.
This information isn't likely part of the sales pitch.
To help combat high winds, dampers are typically installed
at the tops of these ultra tall towers.
432 Park Avenue has two.
A damper is a massive shock absorber
strapped to the walls of the building
with cables and hydraulics.
Its weight is used to counteract the wind
and pull the building back towards the center.
In a building of such tall height
and such small footprint,
movement can't be avoided completely.
Although the dampers keep residents in the sky
from feeling like mariners at sea,
some are still complaining
about the building's unusual sway.
But that's just one of the many problems listed in the lawsuit.
Early wind tunnel testing showed that 432 Park Avenue
was suffering from significant vibrations,
even in low wind conditions.
When wind moves past a building,
it leaves a low-pressure area in its tracks,
causing vibration known as vortex shedding.
Extreme vortex shedding can cause,
well, extreme structural shedding.
[bleep]
[Onlookers] Oh, [bleep].
Ohhh!
[Narrator] The solution?
Leaving some floors of the building
completely empty and windowless.
Like making holes in the sail of a boat,
this allows wind to pass through the building,
essentially making it more aerodynamic.
This design solution effectively decreased
some vortex shedding, but created wind tunnels
that caused a flurry of other issues.
The lawsuit lists "horrible and obtrusive noise and vibrations"
as major problems.
Some residents compare the noise from the trash chute
to that of detonating a bomb.
Others have been trapped in malfunctioning elevators
due to the building's vibrations.
So 432 Park Avenue's wind-resistant design
isn't exactly a slam dunk.
Now-deceased Rafael Vinoly, the architect behind 432 Park Ave,
admitted that the building had a couple of screw-ups.
This isn't the first time Vinoly took heat
for one of his designs.
The curvy glass facade of his Walkie-Talkie tower in London
bounced sunlight into one concentrated area below
so harshly it literally fried bike seats at street level.
Rather than sun, this structure is plagued by wind.
Perhaps 432 Park Avenue lives up to the design
that inspired Vinoly in the first place:
an elegant wastebasket.
[Narrator] Buildings collapse for all kinds of reasons.
Some are planned.
[explosion]
Others, not so much.
Mother Nature certainly plays a role,
but a lot of the time,
shortcuts in design, execution and materials
play a bigger one.
Lagos, in the African nation of Nigeria
is no stranger to construction fails.
In the city of Lagos,
buildings are collapsing at an alarming rate.
Every two weeks, another one bites the dust.
[shouting]
According to Nigeria's Council for Regulating Engineering,
350 lives have been lost over 12 years.
But these collapses are not prompted by natural disasters.
These buildings are just falling down.
As Lagos continues to grow outward and upward,
so does its death toll.
In 2021, the city saw one of its most notorious collapses
when a 21-story luxury high-rise plummeted
claiming at least 42 lives.
The high-rise was under construction in Ikoyi,
a prominent neighborhood that's become
a beacon of status and wealth,
known for its luxury real estate.
An apartment here easily goes for 1.5 million U.S. dollars.
To put things in perspective,
the average monthly salary in Lagos is 200 bucks.
The wreckage of these luxury flats revealed
a structural failure in the columns on the ground floor.
So what went wrong?
A report revealed that the engineers employed
to design and build the columns lacked the know-how to do it.
They did not have the necessary expertise to build a high-rise.
High-rises mean high stakes.
If the building's load-bearing system isn't designed
and executed properly from the ground up...
boom!
A tall building needs a deep foundation
to withstand forces from
lateral loads, like high winds,
and vertical loads, like the
weight of the structure itself.
Columns can play an essential
role of bearing the load.
When they aren't strong enough,
the building collapses.
And it's not just high-rises.
The buildings in Lagos don't seem to stand a chance.
Instances of building without obtaining a proper permit,
inadequate execution of design,
and violation of building code
are just a few of the reasons listed
for these tragic collapses.
Two-story buildings are among the most common types
of structures in Lagos.
These low-rise buildings often benefit
from straightforward construction methods.
Though they're not immune to collapse.
To build a low-rise, a simple load-bearing wall structure
is set up where the walls support the building's weight
without needing a lot of extra steel or concrete for support.
Sturdy and straightforward,
if you're using the right materials.
Concrete is one of the most vital building materials
in Nigeria, heavily used across most construction projects.
Concrete is designed to hold up for about 100 years.
But some buildings are failing much faster in Lagos.
As much as 25% of Nigeria's building collapses occur
due to poor quality building materials.
The issue?
A super popular building material
called sandcrete blocks.
Sandcrete is a form of concrete
that uses a mixture of sand and water, bound by cement.
The materials are mixed together
and compacted into a mold.
Substandard sandcrete blocks are a growing concern.
When experts ran compliance tests,
their findings were shocking.
They uncovered numerous building standards
that weren't met.
Listing a lack of quality control,
poor selection of materials,
and inadequate curing time by manufacturers.
It's no wonder even straightforward
construction projects are failing,
with 95% of Nigeria's building walling materials
made of sandcrete blocks,
from luxury high-rises to public buildings
and low-rise residences.
This building material plays a key role
in the catastrophic rate of building collapse in Nigeria.
The landscape of construction in Nigeria
certainly won't change overnight.
Big strides will need to be taken.
Recently, the Lagos State Building Control Agency
took its first steps.
They embarked on a vigorous campaign to find and rectify
structural deficiencies in the city's architecture.
[shouting]
Only time will tell how the new regulations will be enforced.
For hundreds of years, humans have harnessed water
to process their food, build their homes,
and light their cities.
It's easy to think water has been our faithful servant.
But if you think we hold the power, you're all wet.
It's perfect weather for working outside.
[Worker] Go on!
[Narrator] Warm and sunny with a 10% chance of showers.
Make that 100%.
[laughter]
I'll have that dripping faucet fixed in a jiffy.
There you go.
As you can see, it's no longer dripping.
Ever get the feeling you've got a rain cloud
following you around?
[Woman] Look at the--!
Y'all, I cannot.
[Narrator] When we rented the place, nobody mentioned
that the tenants upstairs had a water park in their apartment.
[Woman] I can't believe this [bleep]! I can't. Y'all!
[Narrator] They even put in a slide.
They should totally lose their security deposit.
[Man] I don't think that's good.
[Narrator] On this episode of D-I-Why Me?,
the shocking finale.
Planting his boot on its gaping maw,
the great hunter subdues the writhing beast,
as the serpent thrashes and spits.
Another warrior tries to snare the coiled monster,
but it rears up and breaks free.
Now the hunters became the hunted,
dodging the deadly spray.
The great hunter approaches stealthily,
and in a daring strike, seizes the serpent from behind
and tames the massive creature.
Ew. Please tell me that's water.
Dude, it's not water.
This job totally stinks.
For only a few dollars more per night,
hotel guests can soak away their stress
in our deluxe spa suite.
And every parking voucher comes with a complimentary car wash.
Didn't you say you had to take a leak?
[laughter]
No worries, it's just a little H2... oh, my god!
As part of its Highway Beautification Program,
this city is constructing a rest stop with an outdoor pool.
Please proceed to Gate 10 with your boarding pass and towel.
If you're not skilled or careful, or just plain unlucky,
pretty much any situation can become
an instant recipe for disaster.
Just add water.
[Narrator] When a growing city needs to build a new airport
or expand an existing one,
sometimes the best option is the least expected.
Being out on the water isn't just for boats anymore.
Osaka, Japan.
The city was in desperate need of an aviation upgrade.
The Osaka Itami International Airport was busy.
Too busy.
And too loud.
Residents complained about the noise from the jet engines.
There simply wasn't enough room on land to expand.
So, they looked to the sea.
Osaka Bay, to be exact.
The Kansai International Airport
would be built on an island.
The catch: the island didn't exist yet.
A new airport would bring expanded economic benefits,
help with overcrowding at the mainland airport,
and best of all, it would be far away
from the ears of light sleepers.
But how do you build an airport on water?
Simple, just initiate one of the world's most incredible
engineering feats of the 20th century.
Construction began in 1987.
Before reclaimed land can support the required weight,
it needs to be built into a concentrated foundation.
To build the island on the surface of the water,
the construction crew needed soil,
and lots of it.
They dredged Osaka Bay
and shipped in soil on giant barges.
[horn blows]
The amount of reclamation fill material used to create
the islands amounted to over 560 million cubic yards.
That's the equivalent volume of 430 Empire State Buildings.
Next came more than 2 million vertical pipes.
These pipes were pummeled into the clay and packed with sand,
which absorbed moisture pockets from the layers below.
So far, so good. Right?
Well, wait.
After seven years of construction,
the airport consisted of one runway, a seven-mile seawall,
two terminals, and a cargo facility.
It was connected to the mainland
by a 2.3-mile-long, two-story bridge.
When the airport opened in 1994,
10,000 people visited a day for the first month,
just to see the bridge.
And it truly was an incredible feat of ingenuity, creativity,
and construction success!
But the accolades didn't last.
Turns out the airport is sinking into Osaka Bay.
That's right, sinking!
No surprise to the engineers who predicted
the island airport would sink.
But they predicted it would be incrementally over decades.
Estimates suggested it would take 45 years
for the airport to sink 26 feet.
That benchmark was reached in just five years.
So what went wrong?
It started with the construction
of that reclaimed land.
Below the surface of Osaka Bay,
layers of clay and sand have been built up over time.
The alternating layers pose a unique challenge.
Engineers took great pains solidifying the upper layer.
But it's the lower layer that is causing all the problems.
Clay is anywhere from 40% to 70% water.
The more weight put on the layers,
the more the water squeezes out of the clay.
This is a phenomenon called consolidation.
With less water, the clay gets harder.
And the weight on top,
in this case, about a 3 million-ton airport,
sinks.
So, the Kansai Airport engineers were correct
that the airport would sink;
their calculations were just off.
Below the airport, the depths of the settlement varies,
causing the sinking to happen unequally.
Engineers made adjustments to the building
to combat the uneven sinking.
Sensors alert workers when one of the 900 support columns
has lowered.
Columns can be adjusted using hydraulic jacks
and metal plates are placed under the columns
to keep the upper floors level.
The design allows for walls to be jacked up
and stairs to be added as needed,
because the airport continues to sink.
Outside, the runway is made with flexible asphalt
for movement if the ground shifts or sinks.
The airport may be sinking,
but all planes need to land is a level runway.
And as long as the engineers keep it sinking
at an even pace,
the airport shouldn't have any further bumps in the road
or the runway.
[Narrator] Art can be subjective.
And in this case, so can the museum it's housed in.
In 2007, the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, Canada,
the ROM for short, unveiled its new face lift.
Some might say not a very good one.
The Michael Lee-Chin Crystal,
a 175,000-square-foot
aluminum and glass-covered structure,
was the centerpiece of a massive museum renovation,
converting its entrance from this...
to this.
The renovation project was a year and a half late
and 50 million Canadian dollars over budget.
Yet, it wasn't crystal clear
whether the project was a success.
Critics seemed divided.
They either loved it or loathed it.
One thing was for sure: people loved talking about it.
All press is good press, right?
The Washington Post called it "both ugly and useless."
The Globe and Mail described the Crystal as a "tin pinata"
to be smashed down.
Hmm, maybe not.
There were also defenders of the ROM's new facade.
Like architect Alexander Josephson
who called the ROM's Crystal
"an important addition to Toronto."
He famously said,
"Beauty emerges when design misbehaves."
And boy, did this design misbehave.
Improper lighting, slanted walls,
a disorienting entryway.
The space didn't seem to match its function:
to display artifacts.
So what went wrong?
The Royal Ontario Museum first opened its doors in 1914
becoming Canada's largest museum.
Today, it houses a world-class collection
of 18 million artworks, cultural objects
and natural history specimens.
At the turn of the century,
the ROM team decided it was important that the building
not be as antiquated as some of its treasured collections.
Museums often turn to architecture
to stay current and garner global attention.
Architecture plays a starring role
in the identity of the museum.
Would Paris' Louvre remain relevant
without I.M. Pei's pyramid,
bringing the former medieval fortress into this century?
What would the Guggenheim in New York City
be without its spiraling corridors?
It seems every museum has its thing.
And in 2001 the Royal Ontario Museum decided
this was going to be its thing.
Inspired by the museum's gem and mineral collection,
architect Daniel Libeskind sketched the Crystal design
on a napkin.
Typically, napkins go in the waste bin, but not this one.
The design on this one was selected as the centerpiece
of the ROM's renovation.
Each of the five distinct crystals
would meet in the middle
to create the three-dimensional design.
The aim was to create openness and accessibility
by using transparent and translucent glass
supported by steel beams.
3,800 tons of steel and 38 tons of bolts were used
to create the skeleton.
There were more than 2,000 pieces of steel
with as many as 12 connections each.
Construction workers had to use laptops to view a 3D mockup
to put together the gargantuan steel jigsaw puzzle.
The Crystal addition quickly became one of the most
challenging construction jobs in North America.
The steel skeleton was supposed to be covered in glass.
There was only one problem:
it gets pretty cold in this city.
Toronto winters average around 22 degrees Fahrenheit
with cold spells that can dip down to -13 degrees Fahrenheit.
The high cost of building a glass structure
that can withstand the harsh Canadian climate
shattered any plans of an all-glass design.
Instead, an opaque aluminum cladding was used
over 75% of the structure,
with 25% glass incorporated throughout.
Short of being what some called an eyesore on the exterior,
the building materials combined with the structure's
unique geometry caused numerous problems on the interior.
The renovation opened the museum's galleries
to more daylight, which risked bleaching priceless artifacts.
The museum had to put up special blinds
that filter out 96% of ultraviolet light
and blackout curtains to block out daylight.
But lighting wasn't the only issue.
Ever try displaying an object on a slanted wall?
Hard to do.
Inside the Crystal galleries,
slanted walls are often the case.
There are no right angles to create vertical walls
suitable for displaying artifacts.
Best of luck to the curators.
The solution was to make some galleries home
to unconventional pieces that don't require walls
to be displayed, like the dinosaur exhibit.
When doors finally opened to the public,
they were somewhat hard to find
and deemed too small for a building of this stature.
Once inside, many visitors found the new lobby
and galleries hard to navigate.
Some complained of feeling disoriented in the space.
The shortcomings of the interior kept on coming.
But so did the public.
Almost a million visitors came through the ROM
the year of the Crystal's unveiling.
The renovation put the ROM on a global map.
Maybe for the wrong reasons.
17 years later, a new renovation is underway,
looking to right a few of those wrongs.
Step one: a partial demolition of that controversial Crystal.
The 130 million-Canadian dollar project will improve flow
between galleries, open up the entrance and lobby,
and expand gallery space on the first floor.
In 2027, when it's complete, we'll see if the public
can finally get clarity on how they feel about the Crystal.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.