Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
400 years ago, one man launched a
crusade against the forces of darkness.
To people who believe literally in
magic, these are murder weapons and
they're terrifyingly effective.
>> That man was King James, the first ruler
of both Scotland and England. He
believed that Satan and a conspiracy of
witches were trying to kill him.
>> I do not know Satan, sir.
>> What powers did Satan offer you?
What diabolical promises did he make to
you?
>> He even wrote a manual on the dangers of
witchcraft.
This is the story of how one man's
paranoia sparked persecution across the
British Isles.
>> The witch hunts have to be one of the
greatest injustices ever seen in British
history. It involved hundreds, if not
thousands of women being put to death
for crimes they could never have
committed.
In this film, we reveal extraordinary
archaeological discoveries showing that
belief in witches survived the King's
Crusade.
>> They knew that it was dangerous, but if
you believe something deeply enough,
then the fact that your your life is in
danger for doing it is not going to stop
you.
In 1590, the British Isles were ruled by
two monarchs, the English Queen
Elizabeth I and King James V 6th of
Scotland.
In May of that year, James was returning
home from Denmark with his new wife,
Anne. But this honeymoon voyage turned
into a nightmare.
As the flatillaa crossed the North Sea,
an enormous storm blew up.
According to a sensational account of
the incident, the king's ship in
particular was buffeted by extreme winds
and huge waves.
>> It said that the ship behaved
differently from all the other ships in
the flatillaa that was coming across
with with the Royal ship itself. that
the winds affected it differently, that
it couldn't be controlled by the sailors
in a natural way, and therefore it was
thought that the storm must have been
caused unnaturally,
that James and Anne must be its target.
The idea that the storm had been
generated specifically to kill the royal
couple seeded a terrible fear in James'
mind.
The young king was already nervous, with
good reason.
He had powerful enemies and he had been
abandoned as a baby when his mother,
Mary, Queen of Scots, was forced to flee
the country.
James grew up in a pretty terrible
context for a young monarch. Uh, he
succeeded a mother who gets her head
hacked off an English jail. His dad's
already dead, strangled after an attempt
to blow him up. There are four guys in
charge of Scotland while James is
growing up. And all of them are either
murdered or executed or driven into
exile. And when James becomes a man,
before he leaves Scotland, there are
apparently two attempts to kidnap or
assassinate him. One of which is foiled
only by him pinning the assassin's head
under an arm and screaming for help. No
wonder he's edgy.
As James brooded on the storm that had
almost killed him, he became convinced
that this was another assassination
attempt. But this time it had been
orchestrated by sorcerers and witches.
His fear of the threat posed by
witchcraft had grown during his stay in
the Danish royal court.
Denmark is one of the intellectual
centers of witch hunting in the age. So
it's probable that he's been discussing
witches and demons with some of the most
interesting minds in Europe and come
back to Scotland interested in putting
this into practice.
There's no doubt that he's simply
reflecting a Europewide trend. This is
the very period in which witch trials
are starting to boom all over the
continent.
Witches were believed to be allies of
Satan and his demons.
In the late 16th century, fear of
Satan's power was at its height because
of hatred between rival factions in the
church. And altogether in Europe, the
period of most witch trials is that in
which Protestant and Catholic are most
at each other's throats, where the
traditional Western Christian Church is
being torn in half between waring creeds
who truly believe that the others
inspired by the devil.
The urge to eradicate evil lit fires of
hatred throughout Western Europe.
In France and Germany, tens of thousands
were sentenced to a terrible death.
>> There's one description that talks about
a forest of stakes where basically
people have just being burnt in vast
numbers. And there's a sense that the
whole thing has got out of control.
A real panic sweep certain parts of
Europe. If you want a quintessence of
horror, go to a small north German town
called Keddlinburg in 1589 where 133
women were burned alive in one day.
It's a horrifyingly painful way to die.
You're lucky if it's quick.
You only need to burn about 20 or 30
people at a time. an averagesized North
European town of the age to create the
impression of a forest of flaming stakes
and to ensure that if there's the
slightest breeze blowing the houses on
the Leewood side of the square opposite
the wind are going to be coated from the
cobblestones, the pavement, the roofs,
the human fat.
In 1590, the full horrors of mass witch
purges had not reached the British
Isles.
But King James was about to change that.
The storm that had almost sunk his ship
convinced James that Satan was trying to
destroy him.
The king now unleashed a war on satanic
terror that would bring persecution and
death to hundreds of his subjects.
His
fear extended to the widespread popular
belief in magic.
This now became a thought crime
punishable by death.
In the 16th century, every village had
folk magicians who used herbs and spells
to cure illnesses, solve people's
problems, or even influence the weather.
These men and women were called wise or
cunning folk.
In the Museum of Witchcraft in Bos
Castle Cornwall, there is remarkable
evidence of the importance of magic in
daily life.
This is a handwritten book of magic
dating from the late 16th century and
it's the personal notebook of a wise
woman or cunning man. And it is
fascinating evidence of the role that
magic played in people's everyday lives.
It's a real mixture of herbal remedies,
love charms, how to obtain magical
objects. So, this is a spell for
obtaining magical stones out of a
swallow. Take him out of the nest and
cut him in the middle, and you shall
find within the belly of it three stones
of diverse colors. The virtue of the
first is if thou wilt give it to any
woman that travileth with child, she
shall be speedily delivered. The virtue
of the redstone is if thou wil put it in
thy mouth, thou shalt obtain anything
thou wilt demand.
Healing magic was particularly important
because doctors were very expensive.
These traditional healers were really
very central people in their communities
right at the heart of people's lives and
magic actually liberated and empowered
ordinary people and helped them to cope
with the challenges that they faced.
>> One of these healers was Agnes Samson
who practiced in Keith in Scotland
during the 1580s.
Her clients included wealthy gentry as
well as the very poorest.
She had won wide respect for her work as
a healer and a midwife
>> over the ruthful rod.
>> But she would soon become ins snared in
one of the biggest witch trials in
Scottish history.
>> The ruthful
force from the flesh.
>> Healing magic could shield people from
illness and misfortune,
but it could also have darker purposes.
It was believed to have the power to
injure as well as cure. This is a very
striking spell because it shows how
protection magic could blur into
cursing. People did use curses, but
generally in retaliation when someone
had done them some wrong. And this is a
spell to make a thief confess.
You make a picture of an eye and then
you drive a nail into the eye. The thief
will then suffer pain in his eye until
he comes and confesses to the theft.
Most of the objects here are for
destructive magic.
They're the classic image of a victim
into which the person making the image
inserts pins or daggers or other means
of destroying their lives.
>> The church made no distinction between
the good and the evil forms of magic.
To people who believe literally in
magic, these are murder weapons and
they're terrifyingly effective.
Orthodox elite Christian belief can't
really believe that magic can come from
anywhere but the devil. The old
practical folk distinction between good
and bad magic with magic being a neutral
force rather like any technology is
completely transformed in established
Christian belief into a part of the
allout war between good and evil.
>> In 1590, James V 6th became a crusader
in that war on evil. He presided over
the arrests of dozens of people who he
suspected had raised the storm that had
almost drowned him.
One of the women caught in this troll
for suspects was Agnes Samson, the
respected healer from Keith in northeast
Scotland.
James' obsession with rooting out evil
drove him to interrogate her himself.
When did Satan first come to you?
>> I do not know Satan, sir.
>> What diabolical promises did he make to
you? What form did his imps take?
>> One of the extraordinary things about
what happens in Scotland in the 1590s is
that James the king gets personally
involved in the interrogation of the
suspected witches and actually himself
conducts the questioning of Agnes
Samson. This is a very strange thing for
a monarch to be doing at this time, but
it's a reflection of how deeply involved
James is with the subject of demonology
and not just with the abstract
intellectual idea of demonology, but the
practical application of witchcraft in
his own kingdom.
He's an academic scholar conducting
research and wants to do it firsthand.
And also he found it fascinating.
>> And where on your body did you suckle
these imps?
>> I know no imps, sir.
>> What powers did Satan offer you? And did
you believe his lies?
>> No, sir.
>> To start with, Agnes says that she's a
healer. She says that she's not a witch.
Um, she doesn't do any of that kind of
thing, but then she's taken away and
tortured.
>> Agnes was subjected to excruciating
pain.
>> She tried to explain to her torturers
the techniques that she had used to
treat the sick.
She even recited a healing prayer.
All kinds of ills that ever may be in
Christ's name I conjure thee. Birth of
the flesh and of the bone and in the
earth and in the stone
I conjure thee in God's name.
>> It combines magic with Christianity
which was a very important part of folk
magic. Most people who practice magic
regarded themselves as devout Christians
and that the magic that they were using
was a gift from God, part of the way
that God's power manifested itself in
the the natural world.
>> For witch hunters, this mixture of
religion and magic suggested that
Christianity had become corrupted by
demonic forces.
With the king's permission, Agnes
Samson's torturers inflicted pain and
sleep deprivation to extract a
confession.
Under this pressure, she accepted that
she had made a pact with the devil.
She was brought back for further
interrogation. Her bizarre confessions
were used as evidence against her.
So, you took this black toad and hung it
by its heels for three days and
collected the venom as it fell into an
oyster shell.
>> Yes, sir.
>> And if you had obtained a piece of linen
cloth that I had worn,
you would have bewitched me to death.
>> Yes, sir.
But Agnes' confessions of spells and
devilry were so extraordinary that James
struggled to believe them.
>> Well, this is so miraculous and strange
that I can only believe that you are an
extreme liar.
>> Come closer, sir.
Then Agnes shared a secret that
convinced James she was indeed guilty of
witchcraft.
>> On your wedding night.
>> She whispered details of James' intimate
conversation with Anne on his wedding
night in Denmark.
>> But at the time, Agnes had been hundreds
of miles away in Scotland. This
revelation seems to have persuaded James
that she must have supernatural powers.
I think that moment is really
significant for James. It's a moment of
of his being convinced that what is
going on is witchcraft and that he's the
target of it.
>> James seems to have ignored the most
obvious explanation for Agnes' knowledge
about his pillow talk with Anne.
>> One of the things I think to remember
about early modern marriages is they
were not as private as modern ones are,
especially if you were a king and a
queen. So, it's quite likely that
perhaps a servant would have overheard
something that was said. Um, there may
have been gossip about what was said.
She might have picked it up that way,
but I don't think she got it from magic.
>> According to a detailed account of the
trial, in a sensational pamphlet called
News from Scotland, Agnes Samson also
confessed that she was part of a demonic
conspiracy of 200 witches summoned by
Satan to worship him in a church.
Witchers would meet the devil, renounce
their Christianity, and pay homage to
him, often in the most gross form
involving kissing the devil's backside.
The devil had even offered this unholy
assembly, an image of the king, to try
to destroy him.
James was convinced that Satan was
leading the witches in an assassination
plot against him.
Agnes Samson and several others were
burned to the stake.
Her death marked the beginning of a
series of witch panics. Scotland
executed a higher proportion of its
population than almost every other
European country.
It's estimated that 2 and a half
thousand women and men were hanged or
burnt at the stake.
The witch hunts came in waves as
suspects under torture incriminated
dozens of others.
But in 1597, Scotland's witch hunting
crusade was thrown into chaos.
It began when Margaret Atkin, a suspect
herself, turned informer. She claimed to
be able to identify witches by a secret
mark in their eyes.
But then Akin destroyed her own
credibility.
>> She was taken around officially for
three or four months and asked to do
this. So she incriminates quite a lot of
people. The problem is that on one
occasion she starts to identify somebody
as a witch and somebody says to her,
"But you've identified this person as
not being a witch before. They've just
got different clothes on."
And at that point, the whole thing
collapses, of course, and there is a a a
worry that all of the witches have not
been witches. All of the trials have
been mistrials.
>> It was a pivotal moment.
The exposure of Margaret Atkin as an
unreliable witness threatened to
discredit the witch trials.
James leapt to defend his belief in the
satanic threat. He published an
extraordinary call to arms against
witchcraft. He called his book
Demonology.
>> The fearful abounding at this time in
this country
of these detestable slaves of the devil.
>> James's book is incredibly short and
incredibly lucid and incredibly well
structured.
It's a good piece of literature,
>> but only to dispel the doubting hearts
of many.
Both that such assaults of Satan are
most readily practiced.
>> James's book, Demonology, really becomes
a handbook for the hunting and the
persecution of witches. It's enormously
influential and remains so for the next
50 to 60 years at least. And there are a
number of very high-profile trials that
draw directly on the influence of
James's book.
>> Demonologyy's influence might have
remained in Scotland, but in6003,
Queen Elizabeth I died, and James V 6th
of Scotland inherited her throne as
James I of England.
He brought his terrifying book with him.
Demonology puts the king himself in the
forefront of witch hunting. As a result,
it makes witch hunting an official part
of the new British state. There is now a
line to be followed. It provides a brief
simple text which all sorts of further
ideas and publications can spring.
In6004,
James passed a new witchcraft act in
both England and Scotland that tightened
penalties for this supernatural crime.
He even ordered the burning of a book
written by an Englishman called Reginald
Scott.
Scott's volume, The Discovery of
Witches, argued that philosophy and
science disproved their powers.
I think that Scott got to James. He
angered him. He was good enough to make
James worried and affronted and came at
just the wrong point, which is when
James himself is trying to convince
everybody of the reality of the evil he
is describing.
James inherited a kingdom crackling with
religious tensions. In6005,
Catholic conspirators including Guy
Forks almost succeeded in assassinating
the king in the gunpowder plot.
To a devout Protestant like James,
Catholic images and rituals could easily
become equated with magic and even
witchcraft.
Catholicism was still widely practiced
in areas like Pendle in Lanasher. This
created a perfect breeding ground for
demonologyy's deadly ideas.
>> This is a county where there is a lot of
political and religious devian.
And that so this is really this is the
kind of powder cake really. And what you
really need on top of this is an
incident that touches the whole thing
off. And you also need crucially you
need a magistrate in this case a man
called Roger Nell who is very keen to
persecute those who are associated with
Catholicism. And this is a situation a
very feverish and fraught situation
where Catholics and witches can be
associated with one another.
>> In this climate of intolerance and
suspicion, it took just one incident to
trigger a witch hunt.
Allison Device, a girl from a poor
family in Pendle, would be at the center
of the nightmare to come.
>> Allison's the granddaughter of somebody
called Elizabeth Demdikeke, who is
thought to be a witch or a cunning
person, and her mother also is thought
to be a witch as well. So, she has this
background where she's part of a family
who are cunning people who are magicians
of one kind or another, and who are also
very poor, so that they often come into
conflict with their local community.
Allison met a peddler called John Law
who was traveling to a nearby town. She
asked him for some pins which had uses
both in white and black magic.
>> There are records from time of people
using an apple or an onion as an image
of the heart of the person who they
wanted to fall in love with them and
sticking pins into it as a form of
sympathetic magic.
As she was a teenage girl, that may well
have been what she and her friends were
particularly interested in.
>> But John Law refused Allison's request.
As he left her, he was stricken by
paralysis on one side of his body.
He later complained that he had been
bewitched.
Allison was brought before the Pendle
magistrate, Roger Nell.
When Allison Devis is interrogated, uh,
she confesses that she did it. She may
be shocked that her magic can have such
power. She may even feel guilty. Um, but
confess she does. And this this mixture
of the misfortune, the accusation of
witchcraft, and the confession, and also
the magistrate who's prepared to take it
seriously is a very kind of toxic mix
which starts this whole witch hunt
going.
Searchers of Allison's home discovered a
human effigy. The family claimed it was
for healing magic, but it was seized on
as physical evidence of witchcraft.
>> I think it's very important
the way that demonology demonized
traditional folk magic. It is really
quite remarkable that someone's healing
charm, a charm that they specifically
said they used to heal the sick, could
be produced in evidence at their trial.
>> Allison's entire family was questioned
in the search for more evidence of
witchcraft,
including her younger sister, Janet
Devis.
But Jennet was just 9 years old and
under English law, child testimony was
inadmissible in a normal trial.
James notoriously
says that special kinds of evidence are
permissible in witch trials because
proof is so hard to find, including, for
example, the evidence of children and
the evidence of a child is absolutely
central to the Pendle trials.
King James's own book, Demonology, had
fed the fear that would consume the
Pendle Witches.
When you look at the record of the
Pendle Witch Trials, point by point,
it's virtually a checklist of James's
main arguments about witchcraft. If
James is the theory, then Pendle is the
practice. James describes the different
kinds of witches, poor and rich, so do
the Pendle trials. James describes the
process by which people become witches.
The Pendle trials tick those off point
by point in the confessions.
Janet Device gave evidence against her
mother and brother. They were hanged
with her sister Allison next to seven
others ins snared in the witch hunt.
But despite James's efforts to stamp out
witchcraft, it still seemed to have the
power to strike close to the king.
In 1618, Francis Manners, the sixth of
Rutland, one of the king's privy
council, accused witches of murdering
his young son, Henry.
Manners was Lord left tenant of
Lincolnshire and frequently entertained
King James in Beaver Castle.
Historian Tracy Borman is investigating
the bizarre tragedy that struck the
Earl's family.
>> I first became aware of the witches of
Beaver through the pages of a novel
actually which I was reading for
pleasure and I was just absolutely
gripped by the story from day one and I
thought this can't be true. I knew it
was loosely based on a real sort of
legend, a local legend. And therefore, I
sort of set out on this quest to find
out more about the witchcraft case.
Francis Manners had traveled in Europe
at the height of the witch hunts when
witchcraft was seen as the terrorism of
its day, striking innocents with deadly
force.
One of the most remarkable elements of
this is that here on this tomb in black
and white is a statement by the himself
saying that my two sons were done to
death by wicked practice and sorcery. It
was incredibly rare to find on any tomb
such an accusation, let alone on one of
the most noble families in the country.
It's a statement and he wanted everybody
in the future to know that this is what
had happened to his sons. And his sons
are also depicted here on this tomb in
rather solemn procession. The eldest of
the sons, Henry holding a skull to
represent um his fate.
>> But behind the sad tale of loss recorded
on the tomb, lies a disturbing mystery.
The Earl blamed witchcraft for the death
of both of his young sons, and he found
suspects close at hand. A single mother,
Joan Flower, and her two daughters had
all been employed as lowly servants at
Beaver Castle.
>> Margaret, the eldest daughter, was found
guilty of stealing provisions from the
castle, and they were all dismissed. And
it was that that supposedly prompted the
mother to set out on a path of revenge
and destruction against the family at
Beaver Castle.
>> The women were arrested in 1618 and
charged with killing young Henry Manners
by witchcraft.
The sensational pamphlet reporting the
case recorded that while Margaret and
Philipper were working in the castle,
they had stolen the boy's glove.
They had given it to their mother who
treated the glove as if it represented
the boy himself. She repeatedly stabbed
it and then she burnt it.
But the boy had died 5 years before
these charges were brought.
So why had the earled so long to accuse
the women of witchcraft?
One clue lies in Mana's close
relationship with the king.
James's book, Demonology, had recently
been republished.
>> It does seem that it was a bit of a
setup and probably I think it was the
Earl of Rutland who was doing his king
James a favor by bringing James's work
demonology back into the public eye
because the pamphlet that describes the
case actually refers to demonology
upfront in the preface. It reminds
people of this king's great work on the
history of witchcraft and exactly how
witches ought to be dealt with.
The pamphlet claimed that the women had
taken wool from a mattress at Beaver
Castle.
Joan Flower then allegedly mixed the
wool with blood and water and boiled it
to curse the earl and his wife with
infertility.
The Flower family were taken to Lincoln
Castle for trial.
The prison where they were held is as
forbidding today as it was 400 years
ago.
>> Coming down into this dungeon, the
atmosphere immediately changes. It's
very cold. There's a real sense still
hundreds of years later of desolation of
the desperation that the prisoners must
have felt down here and still we see
where the chains would have been bolted
back to the walls and the prisoners
tethered there. It really is quite a
miserable wretched place.
The judge who tried Margaret and Philip
Flower and several others caught up in
the Beaver case may have been the same
man who had sent the Pendle witches to
the gallows 6 years earlier.
Even the evidence laid before him
closely matched the claims made in the
Pendle trial.
>> You can see very similar evidence
brought forward. It was very formulaic.
Um there was all the sort of classic
elements of the witchcraft case, the
familiars, the pact with the devil, um
the curses that were uttered by the
accused. They all come out in this case
as they did in several others at around
this time.
>> The chief witness for the prosecution
was King James's close friend and ally,
the Earl of Rutland.
There would have been one witness in the
case of the Beaver Witches and that was
the Earl himself, Francis Manners, who
was um the first up on the witness
stand. And of course, you can imagine
how his evidence was heard by the, you
know, the hush in the courtroom. There
could be only one outcome with such a
high-profile witness as the Earl.
>> Margaret and Philip Flower were
executed. Their mother died in custody.
The Pendle and Beaver trials demonstrate
how demonology had become a handbook for
witch hunting.
>> James' belief in witches very much
flattered his own view of himself as
king because he was setting himself up
as Satan's chief opponent on earth. So
there was very much a political
undertone to his persecution of witches.
It gave him a very powerful role as
king. What he's actually doing as well
is establishing a reputation for a king
who is absolutely certain of his views,
absolutely unyielding upon them, and
thereby in fact going to cause people
who don't entirely agree to make their
views as rigid and flexible and
articulated in return. The stage being
set for a colossal clash between the
monarch and his nation. But by the end
of his reign, James himself was
beginning to question some of the
bizarre evidence and confessions used to
convict witches.
The growing interest in science in the
early 17th century made it harder to
believe in such fantastical tales of
demons and devilry. By the time James
died in 1625,
almost 30 years after demonology was
published, witch hunts in England seemed
to be dying out.
The king had done his best to root out
witchcraft,
but amazing new evidence from an
excavation in Cornwall suggests that his
campaign failed. Archaeologist Jackie
Wood has uncovered a series of pits
which appear to contain disturbing
ritual offerings. The earliest date from
the 1640s,
long after James had died.
>> These three pits are actually grouped
together, and we've actually got a
radiocarbon date for this one. And
what's really amazing about this one,
it's the only one of the only round pits
we've got, as most of them are
rectangular. They've skinned a swan, put
the swan pelt, lined the pit with the
swan pelt. You can actually see the swan
pelt still in here. They put two magpie
birds either side, and then between it
55 eggs, seven with with baby chicks
ready to hatch inside from banttom to
duck egg size. And that's a lot of
commitment.
This was at the time when people were
hunting witches and anybody doing
anything pagan, it was a really
dangerous thing to be doing.
>> Jackie has found further evidence of
magical practices at the same site.
She has discovered a specially dug pool
filled with strange offerings.
>> These are the contents of a votive pool.
We've got an incredible selection of
textiles,
heather branches, cherry stones, human
fingernail pairings. Usually when they
throw pins into votive pools, they bend
them and then make a wish. This seems to
be a traditional thing. But all our pins
are straight. So, we think that possibly
the pins have been actually used as a
pin by pinning things like the human
fingernail pairings and the human hair
to the textile and throwing it in,
therefore throwing a part of themselves
into this pool.
>> This wishing well seems to have been
destroyed in the 1640s,
probably as part of a crackdown on magic
and witchcraft.
The pit was dug from the medieval period
and the thing is it was capped. It was
purposely filled in.
>> The evidence suggests that it was filled
in during the English Civil War. This
exploded in 1642 when Parliament took up
arms against King James's son Charles.
>> There was a parliamentarian called Major
Celely based in St. times during the
Civil War and he employed local men to
fill in all these ritual pools um these
pagan pools and we think this was
actually filled in then because we've
got ceramics from the top dating from
that period.
>> In the chaos caused by the war, witch
hunts burst out again in England and
Scotland claiming hundreds more lives.
The legal system broke down so that
experienced judges who might have
dismissed witchcraft cases could no
longer tour the country on circuit.
Into this vacuum in East Anglia steps a
nobody, a minor gentleman who isn't a
judge, isn't even a professional lawyer
called Matthew Hopkins who's dying of
tuberculosis probably. He's certainly
dying. He's raised his consciousness by
reading continental stuff on witchcraft,
and he is determined before he dies to
purge his region of evil.
Hopkins lived in Manningree in Essex. In
1645,
one of the most murderous witch hunts in
British history began here when he
teamed up with another Puritan gentleman
called John Stern.
There's something incredibly evocative
about this foreshore in Manning Tree. As
you can see, this is kind of was once a
port. You can see there's still boats
here today. But it was once an
incredibly thriving place where there
was trade being brought in from the
North Sea and the continent, but also
ideas, too. radical ideas, political
ideas, religious ideas, which partly
explains why this in the Stauer Valley
was a hotbed of Puritanism in the first
half of the 17th century and exactly the
sort of place where witchfinders like
Hopkins and Stern could have played out
some of their demonic fantasies.
>> Matthew Hopkins even claimed that he had
heard witches gathering in Manningree.
Some seven or eight of that horrible
sect of witches had their meeting close
by his house and had several solemn
sacrifices
there offered to the devil.
He left a record of his actions starting
with a chilling verse from the Bible.
>> Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
Hopkins and Stern harnessed existing
grievances and fears of witchcraft
between neighbors. The witch hunters
brought these disputes before Essex
magistrates as full-blown criminal
charges.
One of the most shocking occurred in the
nearby parish of Lorford.
One Sunday morning in the spring of
1645, Prudence Heart, a pregnant woman
of the parish, uh was worshiping here in
the church behind us and experienced
severe abdominal pain. She staggered
from the church in agony and collapsed
somewhere out in the lane over there,
immediately went into labor and gave
birth to a stillborn child.
Now, this was incredibly powerful
evidence that the hearts had been
bewitched. A local widow, Anne West, and
her daughter, Rebecca, were blamed for
causing the miscarriage. They were
arrested and charged with witchcraft.
Hopkins and Stern now tooured other
towns in the east of England, looking
for more suspects.
Their accusations became wilder as they
were bewitched by their own fears.
The modus operandi would be to get the
suspect isolated, to keep them awake for
as long as three days, three nights, to
march them up and down, to use a form of
brutal leading questioning, which didn't
leave much room for denials and for
protestations of innocence.
>> Matthew Hopkins recorded some of these
interrogations in an account he wrote
soon afterwards.
In it, he claims to have witnessed the
monstrous creatures summoned by the
suspected witches.
>> Elizabeth Clark, this old woman,
disabled woman, is interrogated
personally by Hopkins. And after the
period of 3 days, she cracks and she
says, "I'm ready for my imps to come."
And she gives them names. They're called
things like Sack and Sugar and Grizzle
Greedy Gut and Pywacket.
The accounts basically say that this
parade of animals comes into the room,
but they are obviously not natural
animals, which seems to confirm that
finally this old woman is a witch and
that these are the creatures through
which she commits her crimes.
>> Hopkins pamphlet shows how victim and
accuser could share the delusion that
their hallucinations were demonically
real.
There are these watchers who are
watching day and night, possibly by
candle light, who are expecting that
something is going to happen.
They are actually very afraid.
Maybe then when a a mouse walks into the
room or a dog or a cat, their minds play
tricks with them. And I think that there
are reasons for thinking that the
descriptions of these weird creatures
are honest and sincere, even if it was
nothing other than a cat casting a long
shadow or something.
The self-styled witchfinder general
arrested and tortured as many as 300
women across eastern England. About 100
were executed.
But in the late 17th century, the witch
panics fueled by demonology began to
burn out. The last execution for
witchcraft in England was in 1682,
almost a century after James's book was
published.
But the remarkable finds in Savio
Cornwall show that the king's fanatical
crusade failed.
>> The site proves that magical beliefs
lived on for centuries afterwards.
I believe that this is a really unique
site and from the archaeology there
doesn't seem to be any more pits found
like this in Britain or in Europe as far
as we know but they give us a a brief
insight a a special insight into
somebody's belief system that's been
very private and very sort of secret
until now
>> over the last 12 years Jackie has
discovered more than 40 pits lined with
the skins of different birds and animals
They are all within yards of the one
containing swan feathers that dates from
1640.
>> And this is a 100 years later than that
one. It's dated to 1740s. And it's lined
with fur, not feathers. And when we
actually analyzed it, it's lined with
cat fur. So, they've skinned a cat,
lined the pit with this black cat fur,
um put a piece of quartz 2/ird of the
way up, and extraordinarily
above the quartz was 22 eggs, and every
single egg had a baby chick in it ready
to hatch. I do believe that that it is
some kind of witchcraft.
These bizarre ritual burials appear to
span 350 years from the 17th century
right up until remarkably recent times.
>> This is the latest one we had. And this
is really exciting cuz this one is
actually lined with different colored
brown and black fur all the way around
the outside of it. And then it's got the
legs of a goat put around the inside of
the base of it. and then the head of the
goat with its teeth and around its head
under its head was a piece of plastic
and a piece of orange ba twine. Now the
thing is ba twine is invented in the 60s
and basically it didn't come to Cormal
to the 1970s. So we've got 1970s pit. So
we've got we're dating from the civil
war of 1640 to 1970 of people putting
these pits in this valley.
The animals and birds buried in the
Savio pits seem to be part of a lost
tradition of belief.
But none of the finds on the site show
any association with satanic rituals.
They were a terrible myth that cost
thousands of lives.
There is no evidence whatsoever that
anybody who was tried for witchcraft in
early modern England actually worshiped
the devil. There's a fair amount of
evidence that some of the people who
were put on trial did practice magic in
a folky kind of way. Some of them almost
certainly did curse their neighbors in
fits of ill temper and for purposes of
revenge. But the satanic conspiracy, the
anti- relligion imagined by witch
hunters was purely a fantasy.
One of the great ironies of the witch
hunt is that the demonological
descriptions of what witches do at the
Sabbath, of all these terrible things of
killing children, of a world being
disturbed and turned on its head,
actually those things are do really
happen, but they happen in those
episodes of witch hunting. So that the
fantasy of the Witcher's Sabbath never
existed. But actually in a strange way
it is projected onto the Witchers and
that these scenes of the mass burnings
are actually visions of hell made real
on earth.
The horror of what was done to women
like Agnes Samson has given us the term
witch hunt as a shockingly vivid
description of the worst kind of
injustice. This really was such an
unjustified persecution of these poor
women who really had done no wrong other
than being slightly different to their
neighbors. They may be um older. They
were often poorer or single unmarried
women and they were seen as a threat
therefore because they didn't quite
conform to the usual pattern of society.
King James's book, Demonology, provoked
an ideological war that swept up
thousands of innocents.
It's a warning from history that we dare
not ignore.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.