Original subtitles

O beatiful, for spacious skies,

For amber waves of grain.

America, America,

God shed His grace on thee,

From sea to shining sea.

You'll hear some say ignorance is bliss.

If you prefer that ignorant bliss, then now's the time to turn the TV off,

because you'll have no excuse left by the

end of this to not take your rightful place,

as a warrior protecting and preparing the next generation.

We're the Starbucks.

We left the entertainment business because we knew that a silent war was being fought

for the minds of America's children.

And we knew that nothing would matter more than exposing it and stopping it.

That's why we're here now to expose the war on children.

How long has this been going on? How did it happen? Who's responsible?

How far down the rabbit hole does this all go?

We know it's overwhelming, so let's start here.

First, you need to understand that one of the most

effective forms of normalizing the woke agenda

is via something called the mere exposure effect.

The mere exposure effect is a psychological phenomenon by which people

tend to develop a preference for things or people

that are more familiar to them than others.

That means the more you show someone something,

the more they start to like it or prefer it.

This psychological mere exposure effect is the reason society is now flooded

with imagery of what would have been considered

fringe by most people only ten years ago.

I was a director in Hollywood for some of the biggest stars,

so I speak from experience when I tell you that the mere exposure effect

is how the media creates the reality we live in.

Simply exposing the public to fringe concepts makes us normalize things

that have never been considered normal before.

This social engineering is how you make people see theories as facts,

facts as theories, opinions as violence, silence as safety,

and men is fully able to become women with the snap of their fingers.

With the power of the mere exposure effect, you can make almost anyone believe anything

with enough pressure and exposure.

This makes it one of the most dangerous weapons the kids face today.

For instance, you might be wondering why some

politicians propose seemingly ludicrous bills

like the one in Michigan threatening people with

five years in prison for misgendering someone.

It's not because they believe they can get away with it now.

It's because they understand the process of

normalizing prison over pronoun violations today

so that it can become a reality in the future for the next generation.

The mere exposure effect is why the concept of putting a screen in front of your child

as a babysitter became normal.

You saw people do it on TV when they were exhausted.

You saw it in commercials.

You saw it on social media, and then finally, it was normal.

The mere exposure effect is also why Hollywood

is flooding children's shows with woke agendas

and sexual content, while most parents aren't looking because

they have a trust bond with the shows they watched as a kid.

I am Gonzarella, calling me a she or a he doesn't feel right to me.

I'm sorry, I used the wrong name and pronouns.

Hey, Blue.

The mere exposure effect is why scholastic is

featuring books pushing transgender ideology on kids.

It's why Bugs Bunny was naked at a pride parade.

It's why kids are bombarded with

pharmaceutical ads on nearly every TV station.

It's why the White House is flying a trans flag at the center of their flag display

and it's why nearly every corporation and sports team on the planet

feels the need to create a custom pride logo that they use every June.

It's why the Washington Post ran a piece

encouraging kids to see kink at pride parades,

and the New York Times ran a film review lamenting that the

new Little Mermaid didn't have enough kink for their liking.

It's why Target is selling trans pride toddler onesies and tuck-it swimsuits,

and it's why they did TV shows and magazine covers to normalize sex changes for kids.

But never did a show recover updating you that those kids no longer

identify as the sex they pretended to be on the shows or covers.

So why would corporations take part in this effort

to destroy the fabric of reality as we know it?

To find out, we sat down with Justin Danhoff.

He's a Wall Street expert who's made it his mission to answer this question.

So how did Wokeness take over corporate America?

It was a tripart takeover. It was bottom up, it was top down, and it was outside in.

Top down, if you look at the banking industry, if you look

at the past political affiliations of the board members,

it's over 80% leaning to the left as opposed to the right.

So there's no longer a balance at the top. What do I mean when I say bottom up?

The same thing that's happening on college campus, we're now seeing on

the corporate campuses, where conservatives, they keep their mouth shut.

The Woken employees, they feel very empowered because they now

know the C-suite and the board agree with their Woken positions,

and then there's the outside in. When you talk about

companies like BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard,

you know, they're probably your largest shareholder,

and they're demanding you take certain actions.

What is ESG and how is it used to push Woken ideology?

It is social change by changing business behavior, by changing culture.

So I, for example, went to the shareholder meetings of Amazon, Facebook, and Google.

At all three of those meetings, they announced that they were adopting

affirmative action policies for the board in reaction to shareholder proposals.

Jesse Jackson was at two of those three meetings applauding.

And Woken shareholder proposals important, that's

one reason. But they also moved the cultural needle.

Fast forward three years. That's when Goldman Sachs announced

that they were no longer going to finance any company's IPO,

unless they had at least two diverse board seats in the terms of affirmative action.

That's when NASDAQ put a rule in place where they

said they are going to delist you from the exchange.

If you don't have two diverse boards of spots, one

for a woman, one for an underrepresented minority.

Why is it that our kids today are faced with pride flags

everywhere they go, no matter what it every company.

Now to keep your perfect score on the corporate quality index, you have

to have three events each year that promote the LGBTQ plus community.

So, you know, you've got your Super Bowl ads that have gotten crazy. There's one.

You get your, you know, flag up on all of your, you

know, social media and your website during Pride Month.

You better find a third really quick before the year

runs out or you're going to lose your perfect score.

What happens if a company steps out of line and they don't do those three things?

They are tired and feathered and shamed.

As a consumer, as a mom, it feels like corporate

America has given us all a giant middle finger.

Are they banking on us going back to those same buying

behaviors after these Alenciaga and Target boycotts are over?

Yeah, they frankly are.

Talking with Justin got us thinking, how well do we know where our money

is going when we shop at Target or get our insurance from State Farm?

We looked and found that Target has given over 2 million to GLSEN, an organization

that promotes schools secretly transitioning

children and undermining parents.

While State Farm went the extra mile after their donation to

GLSEN by partnering with an organization called Gender Cool.

The program that they supported gave LGBTQ plus books to kids as young as 5

years old to introduce concepts about gender identity and transitioning to them.

These companies aren't alone though.

A quick look at GLSEN's website displayed sponsorships from Hollister,

Disney, PetSmart, Gucci, YouTube, New Balance, Hulu, Amazon, Calvets,

Amazon, Calvin Klein, Nickelodeon, Walmart, and many more.

GLSEN also supports pornographic books and schools and opposes the removal of them.

GLSEN is only one of the nonprofits using funds donated by

corporate America to fundamentally change the reality we live in.

These are other groups that many corporations

are giving money to without your knowledge.

Even Walmart has funded drag shows and gender ideology for kids.

Every once in a while, powerful people pull back the curtain to expose the plan.

This video is one of those times.

In Davos a couple years ago Vice President Biden met privately with those of us

working behind the scenes and he sat down

with us and looked us in the eye and he said,

you companies can do what we government cannot and will never do.

You have to change the world on this issue.

We are committed to change the world for LGBTI inclusion around the world.

How many companies have signed on to that now?

270, our goal is to get many, many more and then to work around the world.

We are bigger than most a lot of countries. So tremendous power.

After talking to Justin, we still had questions.

So we sat down with a former top executive, one

of the largest ad agencies in the world, Deutsche.

So it's Chief Creative Officer at Deutsche. I was there for

eight years and before that I was 12 years at TVWA Shia Day,

which is the other probably biggest agency in the West Coast.

What does diversity equity inclusion look like at a major ad agency?

Diversity is conformity. Equity is unfairness and inclusion means exclusion.

Every ad is about advancing wokeness of some kind.

We used to sit around and say, what is our

agency stand for? What is this brand stand for?

We're not asking that question anymore. We stand for

diversity equity and inclusion, which is wokenism.

Just packaged up for corporations.

Are they intentionally sexualizing our children and stealing their innocence?

I think they're trying to introduce the radical

gender theory, radical gender ideology to your child.

They're using commercials and merchandise and what

they're selling to get your kid to believe that.

That is how advertising works. Over time it's

building equity, brand equity in your mind.

Fortune 500 companies, Fortune 100 companies, have decided that they're

going to indoctrinate your children with radical gender ideology.

And that's 100% what they're going to do and they don't

even question it. And you should just expect that.

It just seems like there's no moral construct at all or end to this.

No boundaries to message sexuality to kids to the gender ideology.

If we don't speak up, it's over real fast from

here. I don't think it's going to take long now.

So as long as they can protect their own kids from this insanity, they're perfectly

okay with pushing it on unsuspecting

children whose parents maybe aren't present.

I think that's right. I think they feel at this

point the incentives are greater to do that.

What do you think people parents out there should

do to prevent this from hurting their kids?

Basically the thing I would tell parents is

there's an all-out assault for the four-year,

the brains of your children and it's coming

through every form of media you can imagine.

And if you don't know that, you're naive and it's going to transform

your child's mind and it won't take long unless you guard their mind.

So what can you take away from this? Look at the example set

this year by conservative boycotts of Bud Light and Target.

Those companies have lost over 40 billion since the start of those

boycotts. Use your money as a weapon to fight back and the war on children.

Go the extra mile to buy from companies or small

businesses who aren't pushing woke agendas.

This is key to reclaiming America and it's a far

smaller price to pay than our ancestors had to pay.

Know what your kids are doing online and protect

them from the harmful content before they see it.

Talk to your kids about how advertisers and major corporations are

using the mere exposure effect to change their values and beliefs.

There's power in knowing and often you'll see that they

resent being manipulated like this by powerful entities.

Knowledge is power and a generation that seeks

truth is a generation that can save America.

Every parent needs to realize that what you've seen so

far is only one part of the mere exposure effect that's

been driving what can only be described as a far left

cultural revolution that's meant to destroy our country.

But that's only part of the story. For the revolution

to be successful, kids are the attack point.

If this is a war on children, then what are the weapons being

used? One of the most destructive weapons is social media.

It's a weapon that communist dictators like

Mao or Fidel Castro would have blushed over.

With it, these powerful forces have the ability to

censor what they don't want you to know and amplify what

they want you to believe while normalizing the social

media alone will have the power to transform a generation.

Have children died because of social media?

Absolutely.

Have they been trafficked off of social media?

100%.

Have they been sexually exploited off of social media?

On going. Yes.

How did social media influence your transition?

Well, honestly, I didn't even know that

transition from female to male was an option

until I was on social media and began being exposed to those type of communities.

It just really appealed to me as a scared, traumatized, you know, girl

going through puberty, pre-cocious puberty, and I just clung to that idea.

What platform was the first platform you saw it on?

Instagram, but I think a lot of content trickled

over from Tumblr and it was reposted there.

Did the algorithm eventually start feeding

you this stuff in your four U-pages and things

like that where you would immediately see it even if you didn't follow the accounts?

I do think the algorithm was definitely geared toward

and would recommend more accounts and stuff like that.

There were pushing the idea of transitioning.

Right, look at a lot of LGBT pages and stuff like that.

It's definitely a learning, you know, the idea

of, you know, a super accepting, loving community.

How accepting and loving have they been since you detransitioned?

Honestly, if anything, I feel like I've been hushed.

I've been told I'm going to hurt trans people by speaking about my experience.

And that I'm taking their rights away.

So they want to erase you? That's what would make them happy.

Essentially.

At what age did you get into porn?

So I got into porn at 18 years old and up until 23.

And how did you get into it?

I came from a family, an immigrant family, that didn't have a lot of money.

I wanted to have, you know, financial freedom.

So for me, it was very accessible.

This social media affected your life, your peers, and your generation as a whole.

I'm scrolling on TikTok and I see these crazy

people putting up the most awful things.

And I imagine I see little kids with TikTok.

What are they looking at?

I think that we have teenagers that grow up in

society today and they feel heavily influenced.

Now we're going to turn to the new warning from the certain

general this morning about growing concerned around social media

and its impact on teens and why these cognitive

companies for rigorous health and safety standards.

It really is influencing our generation in more of a negative way than a positive way

because people feel like they have to compete with these other people.

I don't think a 10 or 11 year old should have social media.

A child is easily influenced.

Social media addiction is a growing concern for many parents.

In fact, according to Pew Research, 97% of US teenagers go online every single day.

Like I'm young and I scroll through TikTok.

And I see all of these people who have jumped on the transgender bandwagon.

Our generation is seeking affirmation constantly and that feels good.

And I think a lot of people are aged don't

even care whether that's a real person or not.

Do you feel like your fed explicit content though

as a young person by the social media companies?

Oh definitely.

100%.

I feel like it's making it allowing it easier to get to pornography.

You see something you can't always like unsee it and stuff.

To their finding this identity in social

media, in pornography, from the LGBTQ religion.

There's a higher percentage of women that are addicted to pornography now.

I know for myself I've fallen victim to this type of thing.

Sometimes I'll see like a drag queen being so sexual and gross.

And I'm like, what if the little kids who I babysit who I see on their iPads

are going through TikTok see that?

People will get bullied if you don't have Instagram.

TikTok.

You don't have Snapchat, Twitter, whatever it may be.

How is it affecting your friends?

Like what have you seen from them in terms of even changing behavior?

I saw the kids who I grew up with turn into these transgender's.

And I would have to call them ZZem Zerr or I got in trouble.

I've seen a steady year by year change in their patterns and their belief system.

A friend of mine clicked on the site, kept looking

and ended up starting addiction to pornography.

Kyrae Chuk, the founder of Lips of TikTok, who for a very long time was anonymous.

Nobody knew who you were.

Let's talk about how you got here.

It started during COVID time.

There were all these TikTok videos going very viral on Twitter.

And it was mainly just COVID themed.

I saw a whole other side to TikTok that was went

beyond the vaccine songs and the dancing nurses.

And that was the LGBTQ activism on there.

TikTok specifically is designed to target

young, young people that to their audience is.

When you got on TikTok, you downloaded it.

How quickly were you service those videos on, you know, trans content?

Right away, almost immediately.

It's the first thing that pops up.

They feed you content about pronouns and about

transgenderism and drag shows and all that kind of stuff.

How do you see this when you watch these videos?

Like what is it that we're doing?

Attention and mental illness.

And what is being done by our government?

I don't see anything being done.

Having young kids on social media is really, really dangerous.

Does something need to be done, whether it's finding a way

to segment and remove porn so that kids aren't exposed to it?

Definitely. I think porn should definitely be restricted to 18-pause.

I don't think it should be able to access porn.

Do you think that it's irresponsible or even unethical or wrong

that social media companies invite children at age 12 and out to

come out of their platforms knowing that there's pornography all

over the platform and even predators that have access to kids?

Absolutely. I feel like it is the responsibility of all

these social media platforms to put an age limit again.

If it would be me, it would be 18 years old.

After that, we were curious.

Would young people today give social media to their kids?

So would you give your children social media?

Absolutely not.

Not at all.

No.

Absolutely not.

Definitely not when they're younger.

I don't think under 18, I would not give it to any child under the age of 16.

I would not allow my children to have social media.

I would not let my kids have social media as well.

I think that social media is not good for kids.

You know, looking at this whole landscape from social

media, the Chinese influence when it comes to TikTok and AI.

Do you feel like this is a war on children?

I know it's a war on children.

And not just from a malicious foreign adversary,

but from adults in this country who are

visiting very corrupt values on children, sexualizing

them, and doing so in some ways for profit.

I think we can all see the evidence of our eyes and our ears.

Especially on social media.

And maybe becoming a mom awakened me to the stanger

and sort of the scales fell from my own eyes.

But like they said, you know, we're coming for your kids.

Yeah.

And they are.

And they have.

Yeah.

We're here.

We're coming for your kids.

Yeah.

What do you guys think is a bigger addiction problem and

is hurting more people right now within your age group?

Sigarettes are social media.

Social media.

Yeah.

Social media.

No, it's a big.

Social media.

I think that China is laughing at us.

I think that Russia is laughing at us.

And I think that you can't have a strong country if you have confused citizens.

The honesty from these young people hit us hard.

They seem to know that their generation is addicted.

And that social media is hurting their generation more than anything else.

Their instinct already is to protect their young.

But what are they protecting them from?

Remember this.

No matter what the powerful entities across the world try to tell you.

What the media industrial complex tries to tell you.

You are your child's greatest teacher.

And they won't always like what you say.

But keeping them safe from predators and exploitation is

more important than them being upset for a little while.

We have to prioritize our job as the greatest teachers and protectors.

Embrace the outdoors.

Embrace family time.

Embrace connection.

Emfaith.

Embrace wonder.

Embrace curiosity with you as their guide.

Reject the culture that seeks to destroy traditionalism.

Reject isolation.

Reject synthetic experiences.

And choose real adventure.

This is a cultural revolution that operates both

online and offline in the open and in the shadows.

You are the warriors charged with protecting kids from it.

If you still need convincing that this is a modern cultural color revolution.

What's another sign that we're living through?

The remaking of parenting and education.

But to understand where we're going, you have to understand

where we are, where we were, and where we're going.

Let's start with where we were.

Sexualization in school used to be almost nonexistent.

Parents raised their kids instead of relying on screens.

They took them out shooting targets,

swimming, playing games, and exploring nature.

Life was built around real experiences.

And at school, we didn't have books with graphic illustrations

of different kinks we could explore in the library.

States didn't sue school districts and attempt to force them to hide the

gender identity or sexual orientation of students from their parents.

We didn't have teachers forcing us to watch videos where we were

exposed to pride videos featuring adults and intimate embrace.

We weren't taught about blood play or bondage during sex ed.

And we were taught to never keep secrets from our parents

because predators could use that secrecy to groom you into abuse.

Is it concerning that we're normalizing keeping secrets

from parents or that you would be asked to do something?

Does that make you feel that you're putting your students at risk?

Absolutely.

I'm going to get emotional because I've been in that position as a child.

Where really awful things happen to me and

that individual wanted me to keep it a secret.

I think, believe, you know, from a young age, I've always

like stood firm and what's good and right and true.

And I immediately, the second my mom picked me up from school, told her what happened.

And she took it to the police.

It was so scary for me. I was put in a police car and we

went to his house and I was so scared he was going to see me.

But they let me know he can't see you. We have

bright lights on him. We just need you to tell us.

This was his. And I said yes. And it turns out that he was abusing his kids.

And my mom and grandma told me that I was the little girl's angel because that

abuse was finally taken out of her home because I didn't keep a secret from my mom.

And if I had, we can imagine how that would have

played out, that abuse would have continued.

I try to look at everything happens for a reason.

And we have the choice to handle it in truth.

Comprehensive sexual education or CSE is the name of the

sex ed most kids are getting today in public schools.

But where does CSE originate?

A woman named Mary Calderon who believed that children are born

sexual beings and that kids of all ages needed to learn about sex.

Like CSE is this like very broad umbrella kind of education in term to

what to to smuggle or sneak in all of the priorities of progressiveism.

So you know, gender spectrums, transgenderism, abortion.

So where does sex ed come from? Where does

the kooky obsession with pushing porn on kids?

We might go back to Alfre Kinsey who in the late 1930s and early

1940s starts to parent this belief about the sexuality of children.

But the first director of the World Health Organization was named G. Brock Chisholm.

And in 1945 G. Brock Chisholm goes to DC and gives three lectures on sex ed.

And he says, quote, we have to eradicate the concept of right and wrong.

Well, one of the senior chief administrators at the World

Health Organization at the time was named Frank Calderon.

Was going around the country bringing the Las Vegas burlesque and putting

on sexual titillating public performances for people in the 1940s.

Frank Calderon was married to Mary Calderon who left Planned

Parenthood as Planned Parenthood's medical director in 1964.

To found the sexuality information and education council of the United

States, Seacus, which today is the major primary group at the helm of

creating, promulgating, and raising up the next generation of teachers to

integrate comprehensive sexuality education into Americans public schools.

Founding members of Seacus had said that children were sexual from

birth and that we had to affirm the strong sexuality of the newborn.

The seed money to found Seacus came from Hugh Heffner and Penthouse.

The history behind this is far darker than most Americans understand.

Mary's dead now, but her work is very much alive in Seacus and

it's influencing sex education in America more than anything else.

Seacus advocates now for sex change surgeries.

Seacus also partnered with a group called

B-Vive that sells bondage accessories and

bondage teddy bears. The kids might be drawn to.

What about the books in school? Readers are leaders, right? If you've engaged in the

subject of books online and there's a good chance you've seen comments like these.

People like you have been bold enough to say this

doesn't belong in our schools. This is not the case.

People like you have been bold enough to say this doesn't belong in

our schools. This is what you don't want kids to see. Is that correct?

Exactly. Why is that? Why do you think this is inappropriate for

children? That is grooming, but it's also a form of mental rape.

You don't think that this is empowering or inclusive

in any way when they talk about eating their own bodily

fluids from sexual functions.That's not something that

you think is empowering or inclusive for our children.

You know, I'm filled with righteous

indignation. We have people in this country.

They will go to any extent to push their level of normalcy which is really abnormal.

It's abnormal to put that level of content in front of a child. In the

name of making sure that a gay boy or lesbian girl can feel good at school.

What educational benefit will a child learn from even

thinking about the idea of ingesting their own body fluids?

These are celebrated books by the largest association for

librarians in America. So, parents need to understand that. So, if

you've ever heard this idea that there's just no pornographic

books in our schools. I think we've proved that wrong today.

So, we're not into banning text books. We want to ban filth.

I had a really hard experience with these books that I was reading

from freshman year to sophomore year and even in eighth grade.

There was books about masturbation and books about rape. And I'm a teenage

girl and I'm reading this and it's horrifying. It made me uncomfortable.

We want to ban pornography and we want to expose children to wholesome literature.

We're each busting a load into this bottle. If you don't come, you

have to drink it. Ha ha ha. Give me that. I'll show you how to do it.

It comes with illustrations. This one is called Flamer. Okay? Every one of these

books can be found that we're showing today in a school library in America.

And again, this is depicting children. This is

supposed to be kids. People in the Democratic

Party who say there are no pornographic books

in our schools. What would you tell them?

I would say that they have reprobate minds and that

their conscience has been seared with a hot iron.

I think in many ways the adults had to become desensitized

first to be willing to subject children to this type of content.

What happened to society where we've all been

groomed to now think that there's some sort of

subjective interpretation of a blowjob or anal

sex tutorial showing that to minor children.

Oftentimes we hear about Mama Bears speaking up at school boards and

addressing these issues. I'm trying to call forth the Papa Bears men.

And so I'm reminding men in America to stand up, square your shoulders, use the

authority that God gave you because men are called to be providers and protectors.

Today our men in the culture, our pastors in the culture are not

engaging the intruders. The enemy has not crept around the back door.

We have brought in the enemy through the front door

and we're giving him the red carpet to push his agenda.

I don't know that there's a more important call

than that right now. You know that men need

to stand up because we've been involved in

this fight and I've seen so many moms stand up.

But dads seem to be slinking in the background.

And I'm asking for men in the culture to stand on their post and to address

these issues because we are almost at the point of noting you return.

After investigating these books we had to ask are teachers okay with

this? To find out we looked into the views of the Teachers Unions.

The National Educators Association is the largest teachers union in America and we

quickly found that this year they put gender queer on their summer reading list.

And we found these recent panels at their annual conference. They include panels on

critical race theory, so-called pedagogies of change, modeling climate change action,

using education as a lever for environmental justice, decolonizing, recruiting

allies, how to establish safe spaces, how to counter the quote right wing echo chant.

Right wing echo chamber had to bring social justice into curriculum, reparations,

gender theory, pronouns, encouraging student

activism to achieve equity and justice.

They also went on to have panels on

transformative social change and using social

emotional learning to bring about the transformative change that they desire.

Social emotional learning programs are in just about every school now.

And the warm fuzzy name makes a lot of people feel good. But what is it?

Social emotional learning is a mental health and

anti-bullying program that was originally brought into

schools to teach kids how to manage their emotions

and how to build healthy relationship with others.

Unfortunately now that has been completely changed. In 2020 the

Estelle standard bearer castle, which is a collaborative for academic

social emotional learning, changed the definition of Estelle and its

five core competencies to be a thing called transformative Estelle,

which is a completely different way of teaching SEL in that

it does it through a racial and equity lens. What exactly

does that mean? Right, so they think the original way that

social emotional learning was taught was racist itself.

They said that it made children of color had to conform to the norms and

standards of this white supremacist culture.

And therefore it needed a whole redo.

And what they're doing now is they're taking subjects that are usually taught in

Estelle like empathy and perspective taking. And they're saying that in order to be

empathetic, you have to understand that the whole systems of America, all the institutions

have been set up to purposely oppress people of color and other oppressed groups.

They're saying now that you have to understand that in order to be empathetic, you

have to show compassion, you have to do something. So that means you have to become

a social justice activist for these racial and gender causes and then work to tear

down the systems of America to make them more equitable for those oppressed groups.

Social emotional learning has been the biggest weapon in this war on kids.

They spend millions pushing SEL into schools, which is

supposed to in theory make children more socially aware and

able to have more positive interpersonal skill sets and

connections yet we're seeing a lot more violence in classrooms.

Where's the disconnect there? What's why is this happening?

Well, you said that there were supposed to be more socially aware and more connected.

In that sense, this is true. They're socially

aware of things like microaggressions.

They're more socially aware that people can have

infinite genders. They're more socially aware. They are

more connected. They're more connected to men going

to women's bathroom. They're more connected to them.

We're seeing objective reality play out where there is more violence and teachers

hands are behind their back to stop it because

of these restorative justice practices.

So when restorative justice came in, it basically said, depending on your skin

color, you can't be punished this way

because it would be not cultural responsive.

So now the child gets picked on to get bullied. They have to

sit with the other child and understand why they acted out.

The danger to that is that once at least public school you see it now in a lot of

cities like San Francisco where they don't even arrest anyone for like chop lifting.

And we're seeing victims of horrific sex crimes have to sit face to face across

from their abuser and negotiate what that restoration process looks like.

All these virtues are being taught through either the lens of

a critical race, serious or a transgender court recruiter. And

then when they get older, they don't follow laws because they've

been taught in schools that what they do is not their fault.

And it's the same reason when a child sees a man or a girl sees a man in

the bathroom locker room, they have to go through that struggle session.

They have to get counseling to understand better,

be more socially connected, be more socially aware.

And so that's the danger of social emotional

learning to understand language contamination,

understand to ask the question through whose lens is this being taught through.

And if I tell you something and I tell you this is from a mass murderer, you're going

to take that advice very differently. And if I told you always from a trusted mentor.

At this point, you might be thinking that this sounds closer to communism than the

school you remember going to. And while not all teachers are communists, consider this.

In Colorado, the teachers union representing 40,000 teachers voted

this year to disavow capitalism entirely in a statement that read...

They believe that capitalism inherently exploits

children, public schools, land, labor and resources.

Capitalism is an opposition to fully addressing

systemic racism. The school, the prison pipeline,

climate change, patriarchy, gender and LGBTQ

disparities, education inequality and income inequality.

In Oregon, a high school teacher at Churchill High School recently

asked the students to write stories about their sexual fantasies.

The California Teachers Association conference had a presentation on

how to introduce unlimited genders and transgendarism to toddlers.

While yet another English teacher in Pennsylvania

showed his students penises and videos of ejaculation.

And another had kids in her class read a book we

discussed with John Amachewu called This Book Is Gay.

Stories like these seem to happen on such a regular basis, the shock

factor almost begins to fade away. And all of this is happening

as Democrats in the Biden administration create hundreds of

millions in funding for something called, quote, community schools.

Those are schools that provide health care in addition to the

regular curriculum. Like social emotional learning, that might sound

nice at first glance. But it really means that your child can receive

sexually oriented care or counseling that you aren't told about.

And then we have teachers going on national TV to say that parents

don't have rights once they send their kids to public school.

But allowing movies such as this assist teachers in opening a

door for conversations that have no place in our classrooms.

That just shows me that she's ignorant and has not come and volunteered at all because

are these conversations these doors they're

open. These students have one to one devices.

The amount of things that they're able to pull up that we have

to shut down, these conversations these doors that she's talking

about that's telling me I'm stripping her rights as a parent. Those

rights are gone when your child's in the public school system.

Activist teachers like this used to pretend the CRT didn't exist in schools. But

now they're the first to tell you how important DEI and CRT are in education.

This is why when we're talking about let's say critical race theory and school

people go they're not teaching critical race theory. It's actually much worse.

When a child walks into a K-312 today, they're

not learning about critical race theory. They're

learning how to behave, can act and think and

make decisions like a critical race theorist.

And that means that America is oppressive, America is racist,

your skin color determines your success and so on and so forth.

That's why we should call them state schools. These are government run schools.

Yes, these are not public schools. They're run by the

government who is ruled by an authoritarian left wing party.

And so that's why when you walk into a public school today, it's a discipleship.

It's not even an academic brainwashing, it's an emotional brainwashing.

So it's truly a discipleship. And that's why these kids they

behave like missionaries because they're trained like one.

And that's so whatever they're whatever their social contagion

they want the child to regurgitate, that's their mission.

And so anything, whether it be climate changeism,

whether it be gun control, abortion, anything,

whether you have one opinion on this or not,

they're teaching children in schools only one way.

And that's how they're that's that's that critical

consciousness that underpinds a lot of the critical race theory.

And transgenderism is just one of the ways. It's not a

separate thing. It's just one branch. And it's an effective

branch because it sexualizes kids and obviously it

destroys them and that creates very useful angry soldiers.

So we wondered, do D.E.I or CRT make John A. Monshuwu feel included as a black

man in America? What does it mean to you as a black man as a black father?

Do you feel protected or included by knowing

that there's a D.E.I officer at every school?

No I don't. It doesn't benefit blacks through D.E.I. In North Carolina, in

particular when you consider Wake County, we've had a D.E.I. office since 2013.

And they have spent nearly $8.7 million on that office.

And where are the measurable outcomes? You can't find any.

But what about the good teachers? There has to be some good teachers

left, right? Right. But to find the schools and teachers who

aren't embracing this woke revolution, you have to be involved

and not be afraid to ruffle a few feathers by asking questions.

You're a teacher who refused the transgender

ideology at your school and in return you were

fired and the school refused to accommodate your

religious beliefs. How did that make you feel?

It felt surreal and it still does honestly. You could have never told me that I would

spend seven years going to college to become

a teacher, you know, without my dream.

Impacting and influencing, you know, the next

generation is only two, six years into my career, be

let go of because according to my school district

they could not accommodate my religious beliefs.

That's where it gets really interesting and because it started with,

as you mentioned, the transgender policies that were placed on me.

These policies they presented me really essentially are wrapped

around lying. So lying to students first and foremost because they've

asked me to call children by whatever they want to be called by,

whatever gender, pronoun it is, I have to go along with that.

And so if you really think about that, right, that is lying to a child

because they're confused. And as adults we're supposed to step in and

guide them, you know, on the path of success and prosperity and hope

and positivity and to go along with the lies that they're experiencing.

That would not be in my eyes doing my job and so it was so bizarre for the district

to say, no, no, you have to get it to keep your job, you have to go along with it.

So to be very clear, the policy was, if you

have a student and they say that they go by ZZM

or clown, clown self, which is a real pronoun

that some people use, you had to call them that.

Correct. And it gets worse than that too. When they presented that

policy to me that I had to, they said refer and respect students,

gender preference or pronouns. That was in writing. And they

then said vocally, you also need to withhold that from parents.

And I looked the superintendent assistant superintendent like dead in the

eye and I said, are you asking me to lie to parents? And he said, yes.

The problem with cultural revolutions is that they

build underground almost invisibly for many years

until they happen seemingly all at once and such

a dizzying pace that it will make your head spin.

And while they're all different, every destructive cultural

revolution has a few things in common. One is separating

parents from their children. This even happened to my

family in Cuba where they survived a communist revolution.

Kids in state schools were reported for reporting on their family

members, not dissimilar from how somewhere asked to report on their

families during COVID if they broke COVID guidelines. And if you

think you're automatically safe in private schools, think again.

So if a parent says, I want to get away from this craziness in the public

schools, they send their kid to private school. Their kid is safe now, correct?

Unfortunately, no. I think it used to be that simple,

but today unfortunately is not. And so most private

schools are under the umbrella of the NAS, which is sense

for the National Association of Independent Schools.

Just because you send a child to private school, it

doesn't mean that they're automatically safe at all.

So there's really two reasons for that. Number one, the NAS, they have

these decrees that they come down and say, you have to follow these.

Because every private school follow it to the T, no, but a lot of private schools do.

NAS is an organization thousands of private schools in America associate with.

And it's at the forefront of pushing this far

left ideology. They even make recommendations

that they stop using terms like boys and girls

in favor of gender neutral terms like students.

And at their annual people of color conference, they had panels called

white boys behaving badly. And another panel called no more white tears.

It's suffice to say that if your child is in a private

school, ask that school about their association with NAS.

Besides the NAS, they're still largely using the same

pool of teachers. So just because the teacher goes

to a private school, they're still being trained under

the same colleges that indoctrinate the teachers.

Parents are trying to find a path of these resistance.

What's the least I can do to get my children to education?

The dis-movement of separating children of Korean revolutionists

is everywhere. It's in cereal boxes, it's on YouTube

shorts and YouTube kids and Instagram stories and private

schools and public schools and in bonds and ovals and everywhere.

And so you can't, as a parent, ever say, my child is good because

you're always, you need to have your hands in everything that they do.

The regime change in revolutions is to separate

children from their parents. Bad actors

are working to do this now through various means. One of those is gender ideology.

Your daughter was secretly transitioned at school.

My father passed away unexpectedly and then I was diagnosed with breast cancer. So my

daughter was in fifth grade at the time and was

distraught over some of our family dynamics.

I reached out to a guidance counselor and told her that she thought she was a boy.

That guidance counselor immediately walked her after that meeting back to class.

And asked her if she wanted to be called her boy name and boy pronouns

at school and went ahead with that transition without me knowing.

I'm in a policy in place right now that if your child

identifies as a transgender and they just have to

say that they're not ready to tell their family that

the school can transition them without your knowledge.

This policy has to do with children as young

as five all the way through high school.

Of five year old can be transitioned at school without

parents ever being notified and stay to California.

All the child has to say is that they aren't ready for their family

to know. And it's all in the name of the child's right to privacy.

Well, if they're able to consent to something as

serious as changing their sex without their parents

knowing, wouldn't the next natural step be people

saying, oh, they can consent to sex with adults then.

To me, that sounds crazy, but also what's going

on when it really happened. I felt was crazy and

that's why I worked my way up with a district

saying, how could you allow this with my child?

When summer hit and she was removed from that environment and she wasn't around

that counselor and that school, she

immediately went back to wanting to be a girl.

She came to me after a couple of months and said,

mom, what happened to me at school was just so wrong.

I just feel like it was really fast and I really

didn't understand what me and trans really meant.

This agenda has been more successful than some

realize. The CDC's most recent report on youth

found that a record 25% of high school students

identify as something other than street.

That's an over 600% increase from the 2.8% of baby boomers who identify as LGBTQ.

Pro mutilation activists have said this is because of increased acceptance,

but we found that this is a number not replicated anywhere else in the world.

Something else is happening and that's something else is a social contagion.

A social contagion is the spread of emotions or behaviors

from one individual to another, sometimes without awareness.

Social contagion processes become problematic when

they lead to spades of self-injurious behaviors.

That sounds an awful lot like what's happening when TikTok feeds you videos

about transgender ideology and you start to question your own gender.

The attack on identity becomes even clearer when you see a mom describe how

they knew their kid was trans based on their green vegetable eating habits.

The pattern of everything that he had experienced

as a child including eating green vegetables because

that boosts testosterone were just methods of

his body trying to become who he was meant to be.

You see successful countries a lot like successful people have a track record of

certain traits like strength, resilience, outside the box thinking and confidence.

One key ingredient of confidence is identity knowing who you are.

If you want to shake the confidence of a person

or a country you must create an identity crisis.

It might seem to many like this ideology with

pronouns as crazy as clown and clown self spring up

overnight but in reality the groundwork was laid

many years before by John Money and Alfred Kinsey.

Money tried his theories first on twin boys who he experimented on.

One brother was mutilated and raised as a girl but he never felt like one.

Despite pretending this was a success both brothers ended up committing suicide.

At this point I doubt it will shock you to find out that Hugh Hefner

and Playboy were key parts of Kinsey's plan to sexualize our country.

If Kinsey is the bridge and his science is the bridge to the law to change

the laws well then Hugh Hefner was the bridge from Kinsey to culture.

Alfred Kinsey actually met Hugh Hefner when he was

in college and Hugh Hefner was a virgin at the time.

And he revolutionized this Hugh Hefner into the Playboy that he would become.

Hugh Hefner would say things like fornicate

early, fornicate often and fornicate everywhere.

So what's the motto of Playboy? Money.

Yeah.

And what do bunnies do? They hump.

And what is Hugh Hefner's bunny wearing? A bow tie.

Every photo of Alfred Kinsey he's wearing a tweed suit and a bow tie.

And by the way Kinsey built his public appearance with this lie that

he was a happily married man, a heterosexual and faithful to his wife.

His biographer would later admit that Kinsey was a

sadomasochist homosexual, sexual deviant pedophile.

When we begin to understand the history behind this agenda, which

wasn't just to disciple children through the public school system,

it was to actually change laws all around America that were passed with

the explicit intention of protecting children, family and marriages.

The goal was to actually work through the American Law Institute

and other revolutionary groups to bring in this new social science.

How then are we going to get this kind of curriculum into the schools?

Well, we have to pass laws, but they had to

get this new social science into curriculum.

But then we got to get, we got to do the state

boards of education, they accept it, right?

So you know what they did.

They start sending sex experts to lobby and

argue before state boards of education to accept

this new radical sex ed as just the norm,

healthy public health kind of curriculum we need.

Penthouse, footed the bill to send the sex experts to lobby before state

boards of education to allow for this kind of comprehensive sexuality.

Education, yes, penthouse and playboy, of course.

Some of Seacus's early pamphlets in 1964 and 1965

never used the term person or child or human.

They always use the term sexual being to refer

to human beings because that's how they see us.

One of the early board members of Seacus was named Wardel Pomoroi.

Wardel Pomoroi was a very close friend of Kinsey, some people actually think a lover.

Guess who became the executive director of the Kinsey Institute? Wardel Pomoroi.

In 1980, in an article called Attacking the Last to Boo,

Wardel Pomoroi was described as part of the pro-incess lobby.

And in this interview with Time Magazine, he says, incest between children and

adults can sometimes be beneficial and it need not be a sign of mental illness.

That was said by the executive director of the

Kinsey Institute, one of the first board members.

The primary problem with Kinsey was that his entire

social science and science on sex was based off of lies.

So his book, published in 1948, was called Sexuality and the Human Mail.

Then in 1958, he published a sexuality in the human female,

which is the same year the playboy is launched by Hugh Hefter.

And he claims that most American men, about 90%

of American men are not faithful to their wives.

Most of them have homosexual tendencies and engage in homosexual sex.

You read his numbers and his predictions in his

books and you're like, where does this come from?

Well, what he had done is he had gone into the prisons and he

had interviewed rapists and pedophiles serving life sentences.

And so he went into the prisons and he actually interviewed pedophiles.

And so he asked them about their sexual

experiences with children, guys, is what he does.

And so table 34, this is the kind of the infamous

table in his book Sexuality and the Human Mail.

It documents the rape of children as young as

about 18 months old and as old as about 10 or 11.

With how many orgasms the children had over a 24 hour period, time with a stopwatch.

And Kinsy believed that even if these children were

wriling, writhing, screaming and moaning in pain,

that that was just proof that they were taking

pleasure from this sexual act being done on them.

Is there an agenda to normalize pedophilic behavior?

And so when you look at Kinsy, when you look at his

obsession with incess and with the sexuality of children,

it's hard to not believe that the agenda was not to

normalize eventually any form of sexual behavior.

Queer theory is also why you might see activists using

terms woman with a Y or woman with an X. Those aren't typos.

Those are to remove the word men from women.

Another sliver of reality they seek to destroy.

Coupled the vile beliefs of John Money, Alfred Kinsy and Queer Theory with TikTok

and our social contagion of identity confusion among youth is what you get.

In some pockets of the country, this social contagion is even

clearer, like California's Davis Joint Unified School District,

where students self-identify as transgender 4.3 times the national average.

What do you guys say that people who are identifying

as all these things are being treated better?

Well, they're getting affirmed by culture and culture is the big

elephant in the room because it's like everything is affected by culture.

And so if culture affirms it, that means you're universally accepted.

What happens is they come from these environments

that they don't feel value, they don't feel loved.

So what happens is they get this admiration from people around them and these people

around them encourage them to continue doing

what they do and then they get too deep.

And they value the affection and the attention that they get

because they so so wanted but they have never gotten it before.

Absolutely, that's why they gave Mr. Thomas

William Thomas the trophy rather than Riley Gaines.

Yeah, that's like one of the best examples he could use.

Exactly.

Well, at this private school people, the teachers

would favor these kids who were going through this.

And they would give them extra attention.

Them, like after time, after class, more attention towards them.

They're just like worshiping these kids and that makes them feel

good and that makes them want to continue to do it and make it worse.

Put it out there more and indoctrinate other people,

their friends, their family into this ideology.

California's 2020 to 2021 main report of the California Healthy

Kids Survey also found that kids who identify as non-binary,

self-report, far more mental illness than other kids

do, including chronic depression and suicidal ideation.

If you think kids can't be influenced by a litany of algorithms on

TikTok, then you're not familiar with a famous psychological experiment,

conducted by a man named Robert Kweck.

He was a psychologist at Dartmouth University.

In the experiment, they put a fake scar on people's

faces who were going into a room with other people.

But right before they went into mingle with the crowd, the makeup artist

made what the subject thought was a touch up to make the scar more visible.

But in reality, they removed it before they entered the room.

At the end, they were asked if they were discriminated against over their scar.

Nearly all of them reported that they were discriminated against.

They were confident that their scar was being

stared at or that people made rude comments.

They felt that way after only one impression seeing

the scar on their face via a small pocket mirror.

Now imagine how sure a team feels about their identity confusion if they're

fed a steady stream of videos on the TikTok algorithm about transitioning.

At least the social contagions when we were kids didn't hurt you long-term.

Maybe at a weird haircut, a pure singer, a very unique style, but you outro it.

You can't outgrow a double mastectomy though.

If you watch the news, you've probably heard

politicians impundit saying things like this.

My gender children are not having surgeries. That's really important to say.

In his tweet, he talked about stopping surgeries for people

under 18, which is not a thing. That is not a thing that happens.

There is misinformation presented that somehow that we're doing

surgery on minors or even children. And that simply is not true.

So, Laila Jane, how old were you when they gave you a double mastectomy?

It was a month after my 13th birthday.

And how long was the process before that with the doctors to prepare you for this?

I initially started seeing doctors for my gender dysphoria when I was 12.

So, it was within that time frame within a year.

What age were you when they put you on puberty blockers?

I was 12 years old.

12 years old, doctors gave you a drug called Lupron.

The drug has been used to chemically

castrate sex offenders, pedophiles in prison.

But they prescribed it to you to stop your hormones. Is that correct?

Correct.

A 12 years old.

Do you believe that you were given informed consent about the risk of puberty blockers?

I don't think so. I think it was spoken out very lightly.

I mean, they really did say it. It's just a pause.

There were slight concerns about my phone development.

But, you know, they just told me it takes them vitamin D.

That's it. That's the only thing they were concerned

about while giving you a chemical castration drug

that they give to pedophiles that isn't

actually designed or made to stop your puberty.

It's not even approved for that.

They're just playing, you know, doctor, they're

doing science experiments on little kids.

You know, at that age, you were still, we're still very much a kid.

Right?

Right. I mean, I was really naive. I didn't have the understanding of the world.

I wasn't even high school yet.

It'll never leave my mind how Leila looked when she walked in the room with us.

She was a damaged young girl.

Her anxiety was palpable.

Before she ever said a word, my heart sank,

because I wondered how a doctor could ever operate on such a vulnerable child.

They took an oath to do no harm.

How? Then it hit me.

We have a daughter older than Leila was when the doctors did this to her.

The other side says to listen to trans people.

Well, Leila did identify as trans.

And when you were experiencing the gender dysphoric feelings,

was there any inquiry as to what that root cause might be?

Or was there just, you know, seemingly this shift laser focus on the gender transition?

Definitely. There is definitely a shift.

And they really kind of ignored my comorbid

mental health issues like anxiety and whatnot.

I remember one of my doctors said that if I transition,

my anxiety and my mental health would get better.

Did the doctors warn you at all about potential

side effects from a double mastectomy?

Like seriously, warn you about the long-term

consequences of a dangerous surgery like that?

Really, the main thing was they told me, and this is what the words they use,

they told me I wouldn't be able to chest feed.

I might have some slight cosmetic.

They called it dog ears.

This is like the term. I think it's like when the scars sag.

But that's really all they warned me about.

Like when I was in the healing phase the first year or so,

the nerves kept reconnecting over my scar tissue and it was just excruciating.

Any of those regressive gender stereotypes used as a factor of,

oh, you might like this color or this

clothing, so therefore you should transition.

I was a bit tomboyish as a kid. I used to love hot wheels and

I used to follow my dad around the garage and stuff like that.

I wasn't big on dolls and I definitely was like, you know what makes sense?

I kind of latched onto that as more proof that I was trans.

Can you speak a little bit to your experience

and how that pressure affected your body image,

your self-perception and your idea of what it means to be a woman?

Yeah, I mean around the time I fell into all this,

like now it's like in to be like curving and whatnot.

But back then it was the thigh gap and I didn't have that build.

Yeah.

Were there some, you know, body issues as far as

eating disorders or anything that played a role

that maybe then turned into that more gender dysphoric esyptomology?

Yeah, definitely.

I definitely had some issues with my

relationship with food and my body and whatnot.

That just went completely unresolved.

And they got really bad after I had top surgery and I need something

else I guess for my brain to focus all the negative energy on myself.

Is there a difference between somebody who's anorexic

or bulimic going to a doctor and requesting liposuction

and a child going to a doctor and requesting

to have their healthy body parts chopped off?

You know lately I'm having a harder time seeing the difference especially.

If they would have gave me liposuction I wouldn't, I would have done it.

That's very important you said that admitting

that you would have gotten liposuction.

If they would have allowed it that tells us that you

couldn't have possibly consented to anything else.

Do you feel like you had informed consent?

No, I mean even the way they watered down their wording and

just called it top surgery instead of a double mastectomy.

You know and there's just a lot of information

that I didn't know about like my own anatomy.

Because mind you I was so young I hadn't taken

a sex ed class I hadn't even seen like diagrams.

I think the biggest thing that they left out that I still deal

with sometimes is the nerve damage on my scars and my chest.

You know they told me I might lose sensation but I was expecting numbness.

I wasn't expecting like the electrifying jolt

and just itchy sensation that I can't scratch.

What were some of the effects of testosterone in your female body?

Increased permanent body hair.

My voice is deep and I don't know if you could see it under

the lighting but I actually have a slight Adam's apple.

Is your hope that those things will go away?

I've just kind of accepted that some of these things I have to live with.

You know this Adam's apple is always going to

be here unless I get it shaved down surgically.

You know I have increased bodily hair and a

little bit of facial hair that continues to grow.

I was in the impression that would stop if

I stopped taking testosterone and it didn't.

That's another thing they didn't inform you about.

Correct.

Who paid for all these medical interventions?

Was it insurance or their private groups?

It was covered by Kaiser.

Everything?

Yeah.

Now just Kaiser cover your aftercare now that you've transitioned.

No, not really.

Laila's case is heartbreaking not only because of what

she was put through but because she's not an anomaly.

She's a drop of rain in a storm that's coming.

A reddit group called D-Trans has grown to nearly 50,000 members this year.

Some critics say I thought you believed in parental rights but parental

rights don't allow you to abuse your child by giving them a sex change.

Any more than it allows you to legally turn them into a heroin addict.

In the US one study found that 70% of

pediatric patients are diagnosed with autism,

ADHD or some other mental health problem prior

to being diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

Kids are not the only people being abused in this scheme.

Parents in the oath to do no harm are being abused as well.

When I heard a pediatric doctor from Stanford using the phrase,

daughter with a penis during a TED Talk, I

knew we had entered dangerous new territory.

Right when Avery was handed to her mom, her mom sensed a

special bond, a mother's intuition, that Avery was different.

And her parents, as soon as Avery was a preschooler, used that as

a daughter with a penis, they needed to advocate for her rights.

The trust bond where kids believe doctors and do as they say is a

no-brainer when you consider the milgram experiments from the 1960s.

In the 60s a social psychologist named Stanley Milgram

conducted several studies at Yale on obedience and authority.

Milgram wanted to know why people do evil things.

In his book, Obedience to Authority, Stanley used that most evil

acts are committed by normal people who blindly obey authority.

Basically he believed that most people would stray from

basic morality if someone in authority told them to.

And he was right. In the experiments Stanley had

an authority figure tell unknowing participants

to deliver electric shocks of increasing intensity

to what they believe to be a real patient.

And deliver the shocks all the way up to max

intensity even when the fake patient begged

them to stop, asked for mercy and even when they told them they had a heart condition.

So when a doctor tells a confused child that they are

in fact born in the wrong body by immediately affirming

gender dysphoria, they are in effect the supervisor telling

the child to turn the electric shocks all the way up.

What are some of the more egregious programs that

our taxpayer dollars are funding that harm children?

I think it's mainly through the schools. My concern is

really about kids who aren't ready to make this decision.

People say, oh you're a libertarian, what are you

getting involved with this, the bedroom and all that.

And I was like, I don't care what adults do in the bedroom,

but I do care if they have to tell my children about it.

Why they involve with this has to be something they need to tell the

children in elementary school. They've got to tell them at the library.

They've got to tell them in all these public venues.

You know, ten years ago, do you think anybody, I don't remember

any, conservators complaining about a drag show for adults.

You know, there are adult places that you can go around town, bars have ages.

We've always had sort of this idea of adults can

make decisions and we may not approve of other

people's decisions, but for the most part we're

like, live and let live, leave people alone.

But with kids there is an obligation. I mean, for

example, if a child is being abused at home, even

by the parents, physically or otherwise, the state

has an obligation to go in and rescue that child.

I think it's the same here, but it's the opposite. The government's funding the

schools and then the schools are saying, oh we're not going to tell the parents.

We're going to change the kids clothes, call

them by another name, encourage counselors.

I mean, ultimately we're going to talk

about, are they going to give the counselors

going to give them medication there at school without their parents permission.

I mean, I think we're leading towards an absurd and

horrific time and there already are these cases.

You know, parents taking their kids to California, you know, your 13 year

olds going to have irreversible surgery and the father doesn't want it.

And they're calling the father somehow a hater

and the father has no rights over the child now.

I mean, this is leading to a time in which there's

going to be war between families, war in our culture.

You know, this is a bad time and I never thought we'd

get there in our lifetime, but this is where we come.

Can you tell us the answer since Dr. Rachel Living, wouldn't

kind of child consent to these transgender surgeries?

You know, it's a question that's been going on

for a long time. What's the age of adulthood?

When can children make decisions about their medical

care? We always had it. It was pretty much decided.

I mean, I've worked as an emergency room doctor. If kids came in

with even with a small assurration, we'd begin cleaning it up.

But we wouldn't sew it up even a small ill-incision till the mom or dad got there.

In Oregon, your kid can transition at 13, have parts of their body

removed, but can't get a tattoo without their parents' permission.

It's kind of sort of absurd. And it's sort of

the opposite of what you hear from the media.

If in the media you hear all these kids are being bullied,

they're going to commit suicide because they're being bullied.

I think it's the opposite. I think they're being encouraged.

They're being affirmed. Everybody's saying we're so proud of you.

If you go or someone advises you go to a gender dysphoria clinic, I guess they

don't even call it dysphoria, a gender

affirming clinic, where they want to call it.

When you get there, there's nobody giving you the other side of the story.

You know, people who work in these clinics or people who have either had the

surge of themselves or huge advocates for this. It's a one-sided process.

What can you do? Speak up. That's what every abuse

survivor we've talked to has asked you to do.

Conversations are going to be uncomfortable. You may lose

a friend or a client, but speaking up is how this ends.

Some may even ask you, why do you care? These

aren't your kids. Let them do what they want.

But this line of thinking ignores the reality that our kids are going to have

to grow up alongside these issues and sometimes inside a locker room with them.

We were forced to swim against biological male, Leotamas, who is far really

well-tomised, who swam three years on the men's team at University of Pennsylvania,

forced them transitioning to the women's category

his senior year to where he dominated the women.

For the first time we weren't for a war and

we would be sharing a locker room. We had no

idea. We're in the locker room I'm changing.

I had my back turned silent. I turned around.

A 6'4", 22-year-old man disrobing fully intact with an exposing male genitalia.

The only time we became aware that this was the

arrangement was when we had to see it with our own eyes.

So any man would have had full access to that bathroom,

any coach, any parent, any pervert who wanted to,

would have had full reins to be in there and

bare minimum we weren't even told about this.

So they most certainly want to normalize this.

They want to take away our rights to privacy.

Is it fair to refer to what happened to you with Leotamas

exposing his penis to you and other female swimmers mental rape?

No, it most certainly is fair to say that.

If a man would have walked into a woman's

locker room, a DA is walking in there arresting

this man and he is getting charged with sexual

harassment, voyeurism and decent exposure.

I'm sure the list can go on of charges. But

now it really is celebrated. It's encouraged.

That next day of competition was the day that Thomas and I

raised and almost impossibly enough, it resulted in a tie.

We get out, we go behind the awards podium where the NCAA

official looks at both Thomas and myself and says, great job.

But you guys tied and we only have one trophy. We're going to

get Leo the trophy because Leo has to have it for pictures.

That's when I was no longer willing to why.

And that's when I ultimately took this public

stance and acknowledging how it's harmful

to women, not just female athletes to women.

Leotamas was nominated for Insta-Lay Woman of the Year. That's

how they honored Thomas for taking away our rights to our privacy,

for taking away our scholarships, our spots on that podium. Our dignity,

this award was devalued to me. It was meaningless. I didn't want this award.

They're encouraging men to go into women's locker

rooms and for others to be complicit in the process.

Average people like us, we look at what happened and we go,

Riley, Riley won. You know, no normal person is going to Leo won.

I think what's really worse is the situation happening in the locker room

because this is sexual assault and instead of treating it like sexual assault,

we've got a group of people in our country who are running a large

majority of our country, who are actually more likely to charge

someone like you with a hate crime for saying something about

it than they are to go after the man who's exposing themselves.

When they can't win this argument or get confronted with victims of their ideology,

they often turn to something Marxist revolutionaries have always turned to.

Old-fashioned lying. That's why they try to claim these surgeries don't

exist despite mountains of evidence that they're happening at record rates.

And it's why you'll hear people pretending that there's no competitive

advantage for men or boys playing sports against actual women.

Women in some that are short?

That a biological male has a physical

advantage in sports over a biological female?

Not as a definitive statement.

How many female members of the NBA do you see?

Well, I can say that, you know, there's been this news article about

men that think that they could beat Serena Williams in tennis, right?

That they think that they could actually score a point on

her. And it's just not the case. She is stronger than that.

What's your experience being male female?

Both Serena and Venus lost to the 203rd ranked male

tennis player, which they're phenoms for women.

My experience, my husband, he's swam at University of Kentucky

as well in terms of accolades and in terms of national ranking.

I was a much better swimmer than him. He could kick my butt any day of the week.

Oh, that's it!

Oh, I like that!

How you feeling right now? I'm feeling excellent. That was sweet, huh?

Did you like that?

Every woman in this tournament better look out. I'm freaking coming.

So why are there no cases of females like you deciding

that they're a man and coming to compete against men?

My size. You know why? Why isn't that happening?

This is only happening one way. Women don't want to go into men's restrooms.

All of these stories, it's only contributing to the erasure of women.

This is actually a point that I think is so important. In regards to that InstaVla

Championship, we had another swimmer from Yale, who was a female transitioning to.

The only male swimmer that Isaac beat was a male swimmer with one arm.

And it's because Isaac would have never and will never

be able to compete against the men at that same level.

This is the fastest meet in the world. And it goes back to

the question of why isn't this happening the other way around.

It's because there's only something to gain from men.

Being in women's facilities, bathrooms, prisons,

sororities, locker rooms, sports, Peyton

McNabb, the volleyball player from North

Carolina who was spiked in the face by a male.

Still to this day, she's partially paralyzed on her right side.

She has vision impairment. She can't play college sports now.

She has to have special accommodations at school for testing

because she can't retain information like she could before the hit.

So this is a legitimate concern. So back to the message

that's being sent that I'm constantly reminded of.

It's that we don't matter. It's that our safety doesn't matter.

What matters to the InstaVla to the people leading this

country, whether that's the state level, the federal

level, all of these different sport governing bodies,

what matters to them, is the feelings of a male.

Not our feelings, not any of our success or sacrifices as you mentioned,

that doesn't matter. And that's the message that they're sending.

The mental rape of Riley Gaines and other girls like her is only possible

because of silent accomplices who refuse to speak up about these issues.

So today does a girl have a right to a space where for her to undress

without men staring at her or without her having to look at male genitalia.

If it's up to the Biden administration, then

no. This means that men could join sororities.

Men would have full access to bathrooms, changing areas, locker rooms on campuses.

They could take academic and athletics scholarships away from women. They

could be housed in dorm rooms with women and you can do nothing about it.

Actually, if you were to say something about

it, you're guilty of sexual harassment.

They want to normalize this so bad and you have to ask yourself the question of why.

Why do they want to normalize this? Men and women's locker rooms, undressing next to

young girls? Yeah, we should have a right to privacy, but we don't as women anymore.

You might even be tempted to say, well that's one

example, but this isn't happening outside of college.

But it is. Girls now must worry at all ages about

a man exposing his penis to them in a locker room,

raping them in a bathroom, or they have to worry

about being beaten by a man claiming to be a girl.

You might still be tempted to think that you could hold strong and not

give in if your child was affected by gender ideology or queer theory.

But in California, they passed a law that would classify a parent not

affirming their child's self-professed transgenderism as child abuse.

This law would also give custody preference to parents who are affirming

the child this trans, while punishing those who refuse to affirm it.

One man that would affect his Harrison, a dad

whose son is called non-binary by his mother.

My son actually knows he's a boy. He'll tell you he's a boy if you

ask him. If you say anything to the contrary, he'll actually get mad.

The media has reported that Sawyer's mom has borderline personality disorder.

And there's also a major study that was done that showed that 53% of moms who

have children that they are transitioning have borderline personality disorder.

Does that seem like something that should be setting off red flags to people?

That those types of numbers are showing up when

it comes to mental illness associated with this?

Absolutely. It's horrifying, first of all, but

secondly, I mean to see that staggering of a

number of 53%, and I believe it's of moms that

have boys that are transitioning specifically.

And to see that, it's pretty scary to think that that could be happening

at such a big number, and I do think it has a big relevance to it.

But his mother is able to take him to these meetings or to

these appointments in furtherance of having him be transgender.

Well, she takes him to a doctor that's okay

with it. This doctor actually testified in our

trial. They actually court ordered after our

trial that he has to continue to see that doctor.

And this judge was a member of the LGBTQ community, is that correct?

That was part of her election process. It was like that was her big thing.

Okay, so there's some bias there. Did she come up with this on her own

as far as like I want to raise these babies as sometimes they call it?

Or was this something that she saw a stereotypical behavior

and decided to associate that with a particular gender?

When he was really young, she actually would

call him a boy on social media and everything.

It wasn't until about when I started getting custody of him that this happened.

I just started seeing things on social media where she was calling him.

They and things like that. And then I found pictures of him in dresses

and wearing makeup. And just a lot of really scary stuff to see.

Did he ever talk with you about that experience that, you know, was he,

was his idea? Did he ever want to play dress up with you at your house?

Or was this something that happened exclusively at the mom's house?

When he's with me, he fully expresses, he loves being a

boy. He's like a picture perfect little boy playing the mud.

He likes to fight and wrestle and climb and play sports.

If he were to say, I want to play with a doll or I like the

color purple or pink, you know, how would you respond to that?

I would probably just give it no meaning.

In the Republican Party, state legislatures seem to be

the primary group fighting back against this ideology.

That's why we spoke to Representative William

Lambroth and Tennessee, a champion to bill that

banned sex changes for kids and voted to ban

sexual adult performances like drag shows for kids.

Just yesterday, the Tennessee legislature faced a domestic terrorist

attack where somebody sent a letter with white powder in it.

I don't think there's any determination on what that was yet,

but this is clearly being done to try to make you guys afraid.

When you see these activists do this, and in

this case, we know from reporting that this is

most likely a trans activist, it was sent in the

name of somebody who was trans and they died.

What do you think, are they able to make you afraid?

Absolutely not. So here's a thing. We're

going to fight for what's right in Tennessee.

And these folks from all over the country

that have obviously never visited our state,

that have obviously never met at Tennessee, and they don't really understand us, okay?

We stand up for what's right. We stand up for what's

going to make Tennessee better tomorrow than it is today.

We are the volunteer state. We literally volunteer to go all over

the world to help out other people to fight battles for other states.

That goes back to Davey Crocket. Absolutely. There

be no Texas if there were not for Tennesseans.

And so this is who we are. Tennesseans have got an

awful lot of grit and mailing some powder to an office

in a cowardly act to try to intimidate somebody is

both not going to work and it's also kind of stupid.

Okay, because think about this. There's a staff member

in one of our members offices who opened that envelope.

She sees white powder in a threatening letter and yet it scared her.

She's a young lady who's pregnant with their first child.

And all of a sudden she's got this white powder in front of her. The only thing that

that person did was terrorize an innocent state employee who's just doing her job.

It not even be a Republican. You know, like that's the thing is when they send

these letters, you don't know if a Democrat or a Republican's opening them.

Yep. To the people who oppose these bills that would

protect children from sterilization, chemical castration, or

even these sexually explicit adult shows really understand

the nature of what these procedures and experiences entail.

Well, unfortunately some did and they're still in

favor of it, but many of the folks that we talked

with when they were really told like, look, this

is what this procedure is. This is what it does.

This is what the negative effects that are going to last a lifetime.

When they really heard from these young people that were so brave

to come down here and just testify as to some of their most intimate

and difficult decisions in their life that could have been made.

When that happened, when that was exposed, it

changed a lot of minds and I hope it changes more.

What do you think it is that the left is making this some sort of civil rights

issue as if it's akin to when Rosa Parks sat down and refused to get up from a bus?

It mixes different issues together and that's insulting to

those folks that fought and bled and died in our country

for us to have civil liberties so that nobody is judged

based on their ethnicity, their religion, or their sex.

And that sex is something you can't change. That's

built up in our civil rights that protect men and

women and when you start blending that it actually

erodes those civil liberties. It doesn't protect them.

After a wave of Republican led states passing laws to

prevent more innocent people from being victimized,

many Democrat run states have pounced back what one

expert described as trans youth trafficking bills.

Late in 2022, California had a SB 107 and that was the first one. It's

essentially trafficking. Very briefly, the bill basically says out of state

children can cross over to California and they will not reunite them

with their parents if the parents do not agree to transgender procedures.

That's the puberty blockers, cross-ex-homone

surgeries. That was the first one. And since

then there's been at least five or six states

that have done copycat bills to SB 107.

And so the transgender trafficking bill is an extension to all the secrets that

are being kept in schools by school counselors and social workers, teachers.

And so they've set the tone that parents are unsafe and

abusive. Then they're expanding on that foundation that these

transgender trafficking bills like SB 107 in California like

HF 146 in Minnesota and Washington State, there was a SB 5599.

And those are copycat bills that does exactly that as separate of

children from the parents because parents are deemed unsafe and abusive.

So why would a state try to undermine the laws of another state,

especially when that law is built to protect kids from sex change

surgeries? To find out, we tried to interview a lawmaker from

Colorado, representative Brianna Teton who identifies as transgender.

In fact, Brianna is only the eighth trans state representative.

To tone got a trans youth trafficking bill signed

into law that makes Colorado a state where minors can go

for sex change surgeries, hormones, and puberty blockers.

If they're home state, rightfully bans those abusive medical experiments.

We were going to initially reach out to the first

trans representative in American history. But they were

unavailable seeing as how they were recently arrested for

child pornography charges in an absolutely horrific story.

But as the interview date grew closer with Brianna, Brianna

canceled after researching me. I decided I had to give him a call.

Hello.

Hey, is this Brianna?

Yes, who's this?

Hey, Brianna. This is Robbie Starbuck. I want to see if you had a second to talk.

Oh, no, no, thanks. I'm not interested.

I guess I'm just confused because your interviews you said that you want to

talk to people who disagree on this. And you know, we want to just have a

respectful discussion with you to see if I'm missing something I'm totally open

to, you know, you're kind of stuff that you say on a daily basis all the time.

There's still, there's a reaching you. There's the point.

And then in the call, they say call and reply back.

Do you think that little kids can consent to sex

changes? Well, that's it. Brianna did not want to have a

discussion. And that shouldn't be a surprise because

everyone on this pro child mutilation advocacy side.

They avoid conversations at all costs because they know that

they can't win the argument against people who are empowered with

facts, statistics, and the horror stories of what kids have

been through who've gotten double mastectomies at ages like 13.

Okay. They don't want to speak to people like that. They want to speak to the

people who are manipulatable. They want to speak to the people who are weaker.

That's why they target children. They want to

speak to people who are not resolute in their

values because ultimately they know that's the

only group that they can get on their side.

That's why they run away from these conversations. So it shouldn't

be a surprise to you that they're not interested in conversation.

In fact, in the email before this, they said

they didn't want to do the interview anymore

because they don't want to go into the lions den

and stick their head in the mouth of the lion.

You know, it's kind of a compliment because I do kind of

feel like that's what parents need to be right now. Lions who

protect our pride, protect our children. That's the pride there

should be on all our minds is the one that we need to protect.

An ongoing theme we noticed when we tried to learn more

about the opinions and beliefs of people on the left who

adhere to this ideology, we realized they don't want to talk.

They declined interview after interview after interview.

We were left with no other choice. We tried to call them.

Really sad that you feel that way. We actually represent a lot of,

you know, detransitioners that also have a voice and should be heard.

Do you not believe there's anything such as detransitioners?

We heard of detransitioners that have had their

genitals medilated and are on hold like God.

Have had surgeries and double mastectomies at 13 years old.

And out of your asking these questions, is it perfectly why we're declining?

Why does society-

We want to know if detransitioners can get help?

I hope you find exactly what you're looking for.

Why does society ideology not allow questions? Isn't that,

you know, a sign of grooming when you can't ask a question?

I don't understand why you're continuing to ask a question.

This war even reaches newborn babies now.

The Biden administration's CDC recently issued a guidance for

men who identify as women to, quote, chestfeet their babies.

This comes after recent viral videos of men identifying

as women, forcing babies to suck on their nipples.

Make no mistake, this is sexual abuse.

The CDC's guidance doesn't warm once about the lack of nutrition,

the potential for harm through ingestion of the drugs these men take,

or the reality that this is a known sexual kink

of at least some men who identify as women.

This war on kids is institutionalized within our government.

The Assistant Secretary of Health appointed by

Joe Biden is a confused man named Rachel Levine.

He says that sex changes for kids is healthcare that will

literally prevent suicides, but I think Abigail might disagree.

He started at that school. She was going through depression in middle school.

It was in eighth grade when I went talk to the principal what happened.

I took her to the hospital because on that day she

took some pills over the, so it was allergy pills.

So that's how everything started.

When to the doctor, she was fine, but they didn't release my daughter with me.

They called CPS.

Since that moment, I had CPS at my house coming twice a week.

When her grades was going down, that's when I went

to the high school, and talked about her depression,

and I was hoping to get help to give her more time for the test.

Instead of that, what they did is send her to LGBTQ group.

I didn't know anything about it.

So my daughter started to change.

She looked pretty mad, upset, depressed.

One day she talked to her sister that she thought that maybe she liked girls.

But later on she wants to change her name.

Her name is Yaeli. She changed her name to Jay.

A couple months later she didn't like it, so then she changed it to Andrew.

And then she started to talk about she felt like she was in the wrong body.

I'm here, you see a girl, but inside I'm a boy and I go like since when?

I didn't know that she was going to these groups at school.

Nobody at the school told you.

No, they secretly sent her to these groups.

How is her mental health in the limited visits you have with her?

She was not able to sleep.

After you know going through all these

depression is worse than what it was before.

Why? Because now they are dealing with pain, with

medication, going back and forward to the doctor.

Surgery is not just one. They don't tell them that.

I thought she was going to go into therapy first.

That they will explain the positive, the negative and you know the side effect.

If you want to help my daughter help her inside out.

What's in here? Why is this depression after the testosterone shot?

She tried to suicide twice.

When CPS came to remove your daughter, we walk us through that process.

They planned all this with the mother and this other kid from the high school.

Oh my gosh, I was crying.

Then what should I do?

I need to do something. My neighbor had cameras.

So they were able to see.

That car was there for five minutes waiting for my daughter to get out.

That made me feel like my daughter was in sure doing this plan.

All the time that they had my daughter, they sent it to a group home.

I couldn't go to visit after court. It was her new home now.

After we went to court, we had a meeting there.

With LGBT CPS, the people who worked there, the group home, trying to

convince me that what my daughter needs is going to the transition.

And I have to respect her.

And you have to refer to that.

Not to my daughter, you have to say, my son.

And I say, no, I can't do that.

Who's my son?

They say, well, if you don't do that, you rather

have a dead daughter and not a life as son.

And I said, none of that is going to happen just because of a name.

Why did they do that to parents?

Because I've heard that from every kid who has a de-transition.

They want to manipulate the parents and see if they gave up.

And they are very cruel with parents. They're not there to support the parents.

One of them came to my house and I asked her to leave because she asked

me that why it was so difficult for me to accept a boy instead of a girl.

And I said, I don't think you have children.

But it's easy. Just plan a funeral for your daughter in a adopt your son.

Oh, and the moment I ask her to leave my house.

Don't you ever come because you cannot tell me, I'm

going through this depression trying to commit...

And you're telling me to prepare a funeral?

I'm cruel as that.

What they did, people should go to jail for life for what they did to your daughter.

And then September 4.

She decided to melt in front of a drink.

They begged even the funeral at the funeral

home that I wanted to see her for the last time.

He said there's note that you can't.

And I said, well, just let me see one of her hands.

When he asked me that, he went backward. He had my daughter.

And he said, let me check. Let me see what I can do.

He was an ex-marine.

And when he came inside, he looked different to me.

And he said, can I have you got his seat?

He asked me, I'm going to tell you I'm an ex-marine.

And I saw a lot of...

I'm going to therapy because of that.

But I never got to see something like that.

So I will encourage you not to see her like that,

because if you're but if you insist and I cry and I said,

can I see one of her hands finger something?

And there's nothing that you can really see.

Well, I think from heaven, you can see how hard you fought for her.

And you told the truth always.

And I think that's a gift that a lot of kids aren't getting right now.

They don't have parents that care enough to tell the truth and to fight for them.

And you fought very hard for her.

You're a good mom.

Take a few of your hugs.

Thank you for being such a good mom.

I'm so sorry what did it to you guys.

Thank you.

It's my heart.

What would you say to parents that don't

understand the very serious result that can happen

by not taking action to protect their children?

What I will say is not to trust the school, the principal,

the school psychologist, because now they are working on this agenda.

So I will ask the parents to get involved in school.

Go inside and ask them what are they reading.

Because now it's not math, it's not science, it's not English.

It's going to this ideology.

This ideology is killing our kids.

Do you think more people need to speak up to protect kids like your daughter?

Yes.

I do.

Because if they pretend this is all normal or they're just

afraid of somebody being upset at them or whatever it is,

whatever reason they're using to be silent, isn't

it just helping evil people do this to kids?

Yes.

The government's complicity doesn't end there though.

Even the Pentagon is involved in this.

The Department of Defense admits that their doctors are transitioning kids.

One of these DOD doctors actually said that transitioning

kids can cause psychotic illnesses to quote,

melt away.

The only issue is that his own study using

DOD treatment records told a different story.

Not only did his study find no significant

psychological benefit to transition drugs for kids,

but many kids' psychotropic drugs increased after taking transition drugs.

The most pronounced increases in psychotropic

medication were in anti-psychotics and lithium.

So surely the government stopped these experiments on children, right?

In fact, Klein and other DOD doctors, Noel Larson and Natasha

Schveig, argued in the American Journal of Public Health,

that kids must be affirmed and immediately moved onto

puberty blockers or hormones if they have dysphoria.

Dr. Klein even claimed that kids as young as

seven can make this decision on their own.

He called this a human right for the child.

This is who the military has in charge of this issue.

Some major Pentagon doctors recently came out and they said that they

believed that children had the ability to decide which gender they are,

that they could change back and forth and they

also were promoting transitioning children.

We've also found that they are in fact transitioning children.

How did this happen within our own military that we've got

doctors who are transitioning the children of our service members?

I think it's awful, it's reprehensible and they should be fired for doing this.

I think it's a crime against humanity to do this kind of stuff.

The thing about a child making the consent is, how do you make the

consent to remove your sexual organs if you have never used them?

I don't even know what this is. A seven-year-old

barely knows the difference between a boy.

They probably have a vague idea of the difference between boys and girls.

But they really don't have yet any kind of

comprehension of how boys and girls interact sexually.

And it's like, oh, you're just going to give

up on that. That's not an informed consent.

The parents might be able to make informed consent,

but I probably wouldn't let the parents consent to that

for children because a child has to make the consent to

have to be old enough to know what they're giving up.

They also aren't informing them basically of the

urinary child complications that go on and on and on.

Joe Biden has recently been saying our children

as in the US government has a stake in each of our

children and that they're not wholly ours as parents,

but that they belong somehow to the government.

Is that a slip of the tongue or do you think

that's intentional that that's entered his message?

I think the language is very purposeful and you

remember Hillary Clinton that takes a village.

It isn't about the parents. It isn't about the

individuals. It isn't about a mother or a father.

You know, then there's a birthing person and maybe

somebody else around sometimes. I mean, it is really about

thinking that the traditional family unit, the traditional

family values, the religion makes no difference.

Mental health issues should be no surprise

among the kids affected by the social contagion.

Dr. Lisa Lippmann, a former professor at Brown University School of Public

Health, did a study of 256 trans

identifying teens that found 82% were girls.

62.5% had at least one other mental health diagnosis before identifying as trans.

Nearly 40% had a friend group where the majority identified as transgender.

Nearly 50% tried to isolate away from their family. 25% stopped hanging out with

non-transgender friends. 86.7% showed an increase in social media or internet use.

And to quote the study, 60% of the friend groups

were known to mock people who were not transgender.

Despite the mental health issues that exist prior to

identifying as transgender, one of the top methods used

to induce guilt by trans activists who support child

medilation is citing a study from the Trevor Project.

That study says that giving kids hormones for a sex change will reduce their

suicide risk. What they don't tell you is that it wasn't a scientific study at all.

It was a quiz which found youth through targeted ads

and offered them $50 prizes to respond. The results

also excluded data on the self identified 36% of

responding youth who did not want hormone therapy.

They also used this desecration of science to say that

puberty blockers would lower the suicide risk for kids too.

I think it's safe to say that pharmaceutical company

AvB got their money's worth when they donated 50

grand to the Trevor Project since they make the drug

lupron that's given to kids as a puberty blocker.

It's also given to pedophile child rapists to chemically

castrate them, but I'm sure they don't want to talk about that.

The FDA has never approved these drugs to be used for transitioning.

Yet doctors still prescribe it and other

so-called gender affirming care drugs off label.

This is the very definition of an experiment

and it's been done on America's children.

The drug companies AvB and Endo were asked by doctors

to seek FDA approval for these drugs but both declined.

Many believe they want to avoid safety studies. Why isn't the

media hounding these pharmaceutical companies you might ask?

Well, in 2020 pharmaceutical companies accounted

for about 75% of the TV ads spend in America.

That's what. Many describe what the Trevor Project is doing as convenience sampling.

Convenient sampling involves using respondents

who are convenient to the researcher.

What is the cost of transitioning kids anyways?

A Swedish study concluded that transgender people

have increased suicide risk after transition.

The study says sex reassigned trans persons of both genders had

approximately a three-time higher risk of all cause mortality than controls.

Childhood transition can also result in micro penis,

total sterilization, and the inability to ever orgasm.

One well-known surgeon who transitions young people

recently gave an interview where he admitted to

needing the help of a robot to castrate a child and

create a wound that they call an artificial vagina.

I want you to listen and ask yourself how is this different from any of the

most evil medical experiments performed on children in the history of humanity?

That is very new is genital surgery in

someone that is under one puberty suppression.

You don't have enough tissue to line the vaginal canal so you either have to

take a skin graft or take skin from elsewhere or use an artificial product.

The way that we're dealing with it is by using a robot and we're

basically performing intro abdominal components of the surgery.

So we're using paratonam which is the interlining

of the abdominal line most of the vaginal canal.

In the process of making this documentary we tried to reach out to the left.

We sat down with Joellyn Vargas. She's a

tick-tock influencer with over 30 million likes.

She practices something called gender-creative parenting.

Something happened that I didn't expect. She admitted something that stunned us.

It was a silent knowing that what's going on online

with this transgender social contagion is wrong.

Some very sick people are profiting often.

I think there is a big group of people out there who push back against his parenting

staff who also push back against people who are transitioning their children.

They'll say, you know, essentially that the internet is creating social contagion.

That kids are on tick-tock and they see a thousand videos of

kids who are saying that they're non-binary or whatever it is.

And they're just following the trend. And do you think there's any truth to that?

You guys' questions. I love them.

I will say another big reason why I took my kids offline is because there

were a couple of accounts who did center their accounts around their children

and their children's transitions and things like that.

And I started to realize that they were causing

somewhat of a discredit to the community

because a lot of people obviously would

assume they're only doing this for the cloud.

These people have millions of followers. Every video they post of their child and

it has anything to do with their transition,

gets millions and millions of views.

And they essentially are getting paid and some

of these accounts are doing ads with these kids.

Yeah, and so I didn't want to add to that

discredit because I feel like if I am sharing

my kids that side of the political spectrum

does get to say you're doing that for cloud.

And granted, there are still some people who are

like you're doing that for cloud because even

though you're not sharing your kids, you're

still gaining cloud from talking about your kids.

My son, we did a, we did film with Disney before the

pandemic. While we were filming, he had like so many rights.

So like we had to get a Cougan account which meant the money

would go to him. Most of the money would go to his account.

And that he had like a tutor on site, even though he was only like four at the time.

And that tutor made sure that he was hungry.

He ate. If he needed a nap, he took a nap.

She was there to like be there for him. And it made me

realize like there's nothing like that for internet.

Like for social media parents, there's no Cougan accounts. There's nobody

on set making sure that the children are not working 10, 12 hours a day.

And then you see these parents doing like ads and stuff

and you're just like that child is making the money.

This movement isn't hiding its aims. A drag

queen named Little Miss Hot Mess made that clear.

And in academic paper, they wrote explicitly recognizing

that pride and drag for kids was meant to be political.

The sudden inclusion of kids in pride and attending drag

shows has nothing to do with tolerance or acceptance.

It's not only about sexualizing them either.

It's about creating lifelong left-wing voters.

Like other activists, Little Hot Mess ghosted

us after scheduling an interview with us.

This is awesome mom for their kid house. We're a

family friendly drag show ladies and gentlemen.

Drag queen story time and drag shows for

kids are a political operation at their core,

meant to divide society, sexualize kids and destroy the innocence of children.

That much seemed clear to us, but we wanted to make sure. So we

sat down with a Nashville drag queen named Veronica Electronica.

Hello.

Hi.

Thank you for joining us.

Thanks for having me.

I have a question for you guys. What do you

guys do when you're not in front of the camera?

We're with our family.

What are your last names? Start up.

Starbuck.

Yeah.

I'm going to have to end the interview.

Why is that?

Because I feel very uncomfortable.

Can I ask the camera to get turned off for just a second?

I want to have a real conversation. I think that when you start equivocating

a live performance like drag that is not an adult themed art form,

and it's not adult content. It's not a 21

and a triple X content. It's just, it's not.

I'm concerned about children's safety and being exposed to sexually explicit adults

who want to take off their clothes and grind and gyrate in front of children.

Could you at least announce that?

I'm there. I am unable to.

I wasn't going to do this, and this isn't like,

I think this is the stuff I have a problem with.

And you're probably not okay with this. The kids right

there in the background, that's not an enriched child.

They're not learning something from this.

But today, that really isn't showing any part

of the body that would be considered as illegal.

If I show you the full video, you will see it.

But we have many, many, many things that are happening in our state

and our country that are jeopardizing the lots of children like guns.

You're deflecting the conversation, though, and not answering the question.

I so, you cannot denounce behavior that is sexually explicit around children.

I am not saying that. I'm saying I am declining to comment.

And even for children?

Oh, it's for those kids. I get it. We have laws protecting children.

Have you seen any sexually explicit fractions

marketed as only just for kids that you

would denounce or think that are a problem

and that you want to distance yourself from?

No.

You know this is wrong.

So, that photograph could very easily have been

taken at the 50-yard line of the Titans game.

I would have the same problem.

They don't wear G-strings.

But they do.

They wear G-strings and spread their legs and children's faces.

Well, they may be not wear G-strings, but I don't know if that's a G-string.

The sound by of that photograph shows a glimpse

of a moment and probably a moving picture.

I'm sure that that person wasn't spread-eagle there for any...

Do you want me to put it up in time?

She denounced behavior that was sexually explicit like

that of somebody spreading their legs showing their

G-string to a child audience in a show that was explicitly

marketed as all ages family-friendly, just morally.

Then would you spread your legs in front of a child like that?

No, not on purpose.

As a person of faith, I feel personally attacked for the stances that you have and

what you and the views that you have toward me, my co-workers and my community.

The amount of times I've been told that I hate drag

queens and I want them all to die is ridiculous.

I want nothing but good things for people.

I just don't want kids to be exposed to sexually explicit stuff.

I think that your line of questioning was very misleading.

The question we've asked has been respectful, has

been about trying to understand that respect it.

If these conversations are shut down and we were not

going to get anywhere, this interview was not about us.

But the interview is to hear your perspective.

This is your opportunity to tell people that you at least

announce this sexually explicit, egregious behavior for children.

Do you still think regardless of the laws, you don't have a problem with

that behavior in front of children because it's protected by free speech?

You know this is right.

So, I feel why.

It's just a very simple question.

Well, I'm just an entertainer.

You're a professional drag queen. That's why I wanted to hear from.

I am, but just because I'm a professional drag queen doesn't

make me an expert in some of the legal conversations.

We never asked you any legal questions.

No legal questions.

So, you cannot denounce behavior that is sexually explicit around children.

I don't have to.

If you want, he can walk you out to the best area.

The area, my life on the school's ground.

I do not have a mic on me.

What's your head?

I can see.

Have a wonderful afternoon.

It's still here.

Oh yeah, that one.

Oh, good.

Psychology today reports that 99% of child sexual abuse involves grooming.

The methods to groom a child include selecting a victim.

A pedophile named Jack Reynolds gave what's now a famous

interview where he was asked how he selected his victims.

How did you get them alone?

Grumming.

I would check out their family situation.

I would check out their clothing to see how well they were.

When we were on the ball parks or on Jim Ford, you

know, I would make sure which ones I wanted to molest.

I would give them special attention.

Were there certain characteristics that you

looked for in children before molesting them?

In children, yes, but more I also looked at their families.

If I thought the father was a threat, I would not approach the child.

Predators admit that they select the vulnerable.

Those with little supervision online are prime targets.

That's one way predators gain access to them.

Then those predators develop trust.

This can be done many ways, but one is to give

rewards such as attention or likes on social media.

Step 4 is to desensitize the child's sexual content and physical contact.

Look no further again than the social media algorithms to do that.

Step 5 is what's called post-abuse maintenance behaviors.

Those can look like persuading a minor that it's normal to be sexually exploited.

Social media does this as well when a kid

sees that sexualized girls get all the likes.

Social media isn't just sexualizing our kids.

It's also a vector of attack in the child trafficking trade.

To learn more about this, we talked to someone who is

sold online over a thousand times, beginning at age 14.

The big news outlet, the Atlantic, ran a headline saying

child trafficking essentially is a conspiracy theory.

Is that true?

No, that's not true.

I wish that was the case, to be honest.

I wish that was really what was going on, but

in reality as I work with hundreds of survivors,

not only in my state, but all across the country.

No, it's happening.

When we look at our status as the 80% of victims are US citizens.

I think sometimes we get this idea that it

comes from third world countries and it's not.

It's happening in our own backyard.

As I work in safe houses, as I run support groups, the survivors are from here.

I've had two survivors in the last five years that I've been working

with survivors that two of them came from a different country.

Two.

All of the survivors I currently work with are from the United States.

When I look at one with the idea that it's only

happening somewhere else, it's not happening in America.

In my story of exploitation, I was sold in over 12 states total.

12 states.

But it wasn't just me.

There was a whole trafficking ring.

There were other children, 12, 13, 14 year old.

And I think that in some cases we begin to think

that some people believe it's just prostitution.

Kids cannot consent to prostitution.

Our kids are being trafficked.

It's interesting because I think that that same thought process is a

part of what allowed me to stay in modern day slavery as long as I did.

Because people didn't think it was happening.

So, Keelan, as a survivor of child trafficking, tell us a little bit about

the process that yourself and many other kids go through called grooming.

Yeah.

So the grooming process is very intricate and something that can take either

a couple weeks to a couple of years depending on the type of trafficking.

If we're looking at CSEC, which is a commercial sexual exploitation

of children, it's going to be a maybe a shorter process.

But if it's familial trafficking, which is it's happening in the home,

it's happening by a guardian that can take up to a couple of years.

So with my grooming process, my trafficker took a couple of months

and I was actually boyfriended into the life of exploitation.

And what grooming process really looks like is the perpetrator

taking the time to fully understand what are the vulnerabilities?

Where can I enter into your life to then manipulate you

into the actions that the perpetrators want you to do?

When kids are groomed today, where is that happening?

I think that that's the scariest part in the world that we live in.

When we look at the grooming process, the easiest way that kids are

being groomed right now are on social media and online platforms.

I think with COVID, it's kind of increased the nature of kids sitting behind the

screen without parental control and guidance,

which is a scary place for kids to be.

If I told a parent, you know, would you feel comfortable dropping off your kid?

At a park where you knew there were three or four pedophiles hanging around

the park and just take the chance that nothing's going to happen to them.

Every parent would say, absolutely not, that's crazy.

But aren't we essentially doing the same thing online? We're just dropping them

off with almost no supervision, all a bunch of pedophiles hanging out around them?

Absolutely. I think it would be crazy to think that they're not on there.

I think the hard part is as parents is sometimes we kind of

run away from that idea because it makes us uncomfortable.

When I think about my exploitation and starting as being

trafficked when I was 14, my buyers knew how old I was.

And they purposely purchased me because I was under age.

As we listened to Keel and I was struck by the fact that she was the

same age when she was first sold that our oldest daughter is now.

Made my heart sink. Who could do this to a child?

How could this have been prevented? So I asked her.

I watched this video where a pedophiles in jail

was asked, what did you look for in your victims?

And what he responded with was honest and kind of jarring. And he

said, I looked for the kids who had weak fathers or no fathers at all.

Is that what you've seen is that the kids who are most at risk are the ones with no

fathers around or fathers who are weak and are not going to stand up for their show?

I think that is definitely vulnerability. When we look at

single parent homes, I was raised in the single parent home.

What did dads need to do to step up to make sure that their kids

are not those kids who end up vulnerable to online exploitation?

Yeah, they have to be a great example of what

a real healthy father relationship looks like.

I think a lot of times in relationships we

always seek after what we've seen in the home.

So if we're in homes that are broken, we often find that in psychology

you continue that cycle and broken relationships over and over again.

And so how do you show up for your kids even if

you're not in the same home with the other parent?

Sometimes that's just not viable for everybody. Parents

go through divorces, but it's still a father stop

to show up for their child and be able to sit in

those very hard spaces but have honest conversations.

So there's a lack of understanding when it comes to the

kind of the structure that a good father brings into that.

So when you don't have a parent in the home, what we

find a lot of the times is that children are missing it.

So if you're not getting in the home, they're

going to seek that validation and outside sources.

The harm for kids doesn't end with the internet, big pharma,

wall street, academia, entertainment, or even our own government.

The very food that they eat in tap water they drink is cause for concern too.

Atrazine's a pesticide that's in much of the tap

water kids drink today and the food that they eat.

When Berkeley professor of integrative biology Tyron B. Hayes investigated

Atrazine, he did an experiment on frogs where he introduced Atrazine to the water.

The result was that many of the male frogs

turned gay and made it with other male frogs.

One intent actually began to produce eggs and 75% of them were chemically castrated.

So what is Atrazine doing to our children? No one seems

to want to invest in finding out the answer to that.

One limited study on grown men produced results showing

that many exposed to Atrazine had very poor seam inequality.

While a rodent study found that Atrazine could

pose a cancer risk, and Atrazine isn't alone.

Similar studies have found other toxins in non-organic foods in tap water.

After reviewing Tyron Hayes Atrazine's study on frogs, it got us

thinking about how often people we interviewed brought up masculinity.

I think there's an attack on masculinity. I think that it's watering these men down.

Yeah, most people are looking towards celebrities

and they're looking up to people like Santa Smith.

That's not even a picture of masculinity. It's just a very, very toxic culture.

It is extremely hard and challenging to find. Like mine did, godly masculine men.

We just have a generation of weak men. We need men to rise up and become men.

You mentioned boys being boys. That's how a lot of people see boys looking at porn.

And this is sort of an interesting weird thought

I had a long time ago and it's that somehow

there was like a flip in the matrix where we

switched up the way we thought about this.

Because if you caught a boy outside and he's staring

at a girl's window watching her change, he's a creep.

What a weirdo. I'm calling the police.

If you see him peering in on earth through his computer

screen and he's paying two dollars on only fans,

suddenly it's just boys being boys getting out some weird

urge. But the truth is, you know, if you go back in time,

these were seen as the least masculine qualities you could have.

You were so amazulated that the only way for you

to ever see a woman naked was to be voyeuristic.

It's now flipped to that being empowering in some way. How did that happen?

Oh, that is a good question. That's an interesting question. I don't know.

Neither do I. I don't understand. I think it's

interesting because we stopped requiring men to be men.

I think that's exactly where it stems. We stopped raising

the bar for them to navigate world in a different way.

And the same thing with women, right? Like there was a standard. But

now we've lowered the standards to it's okay to be super sexualized.

When back in the day, that was not okay. Not just okay, but it's better.

It's better and it's desirable. And they lie

and pretend that men are going to want you then.

This will probably be a controversial take, but it's

true. Most men, if they want to get married to a woman,

they're not looking for the person who's super

sexual. They might go on their page or whatever.

But they're actually putting them in a totally

different category. And it's not wife category.

And if we're thinking about the context, you know, yes, there's anomalies.

Some people don't want to get married. Some people don't want to have kids.

They can do what they want to do. The vast majority

of people want to get married and have kids.

And in that context, we're lying to kids.

These kids are crying out to us, aren't they?

I mean, do you see that in the trafficking survivors you work

with? Are they crying out to us to do something and to act like

adults and for men to be men and dads to step up and women to

be that nurturing and pathetic voice that's finding out like,

what's going on in your heart? Are you okay?

Oh, absolutely. I think that's the one thing that's missing and that

creates the vulnerability and a lot of survivors is they don't have that.

But I do think that it's the men's stance that really will

create the difference in our children being trafficked or not,

because they will stand in the way of the vulnerability

that's happening if they're being exposed to it.

We're at this point where it seems like

nothing's real that used to be real anymore.

And it almost feels like the medical industry and our

schools are abusing kids. Am I wrong to think that?

Oh, no, I think you're completely right. It almost

feels like they're test subjects. I think what's

happening is they are doing tests and we're not

going to see the effects until about 10 years later.

When we're sitting here and we're like, we were completely wrong.

But at the expense of who? Like at the expense of our children

and that's it. No child should have to go through that.

When I think about me in high school, like, I was a tomboy. There was

nothing in me playing sports and watching video games and playing comics.

Like, there was nothing in that space that was like, well, maybe you're a boy.

Right. Like, maybe you should change your gender. Like, there

was nothing. I didn't have to deal with that. But you're right.

Now we've gotten into this narrative of like, well,

if you feel that way, then you should change it.

Porn is another weapon in this war on children.

Why is it important to have sex at on PornHub?

Well, it's important to have sex at everywhere.

Are you concerned that having sex at on PornHub might

entice miners to come to the site to have access to sex at?

Absolutely not. And when it was created, it was

created. We never advertised it outside of PornHub.

Was it ever promoted on social media or anywhere else in the news?

And no, we don't really promote it.

PornHub's sex at is here.

Today we're going to talk about healthy and

masturbation habits. The proper way to use a condom.

Female and mad at me.

What is normal and what is not for people with a penis?

What age should sex and start for kids?

I believe sex has to start in inner guard,

in the sex education because they work back.

Fortunately, a lot of people think, oh my god,

they're going to teach my children how to have sex.

Well, I think they think a sex.

Do you believe some of these schools of thought

believe that children are inherently sexual?

Is that something that you believe starts at

a young age or at what point do you feel like?

Of course. Of course. Have you never seen a 18-month-old masturbating?

No, I have it.

But the hand on their pants, a little boy,

they catch themselves because it feels good.

Their penises get hard. All little boys ask, hey, look, mommy, my penis is hard.

Like, blind my penis is hard.

Do you think pornography that portrays child simulation, like with

women or men dressed as young children or simulating child behaviors,

drive the pedophilic behavior and tendencies?

No, I don't think so.

I think I have a big head of a child who has a big head

of a child representative, I think, in the, you know,

she has a big account influencer, but also as a spokesperson at

Corn Hub that made a comment about having sex with teenagers.

Did you even do that?

This 13-year-old, I think I'm...

He could have easily passed away.

Okay, if I were you...

He wasn't necessarily like an old-looking 13.

You look at him and he's definitely a child.

He's just like really, like, he had the perfect 10...

He's doing adult-######r and...

That shouldn't be considered statutory rape and like, it's consensual and...

No one would consider that rape except maybe his mom.

And that's what we have shoes like to...

I think there's not one person that would think that's

abuse and would just think how lucky that kid is.

Pretty much.

I mean, and we're specifically talking about Asa and this 13-year-old kid.

So, would you feel morally dirty if I went to the other room and...

Yeah.

this kid, like, would you look at me different?

Yeah.

Okay, not maybe would you look at me different, but

like, would you think that I'm doing something wrong?

I would be a bad for the kid.

I would be so proud of both of you guys.

Maybe a proud of me.

Because you go to prison and you really...

I'm trying to think about the problem right now.

What are you a ####ing like?

Snitch?

Are you a snitch?

Oh yeah.

Would you snitch on us?

It sounds like you would.

Yeah.

Because you're so sure we'd go to jail.

No, we would never go to jail.

I would just hurt you guys.

What are you talking about?

What are you the protector of 13-year-olds or something?

I think somebody has to...

Is that something that you support or endorse?

It depends.

Again, the age of sexual consent is 16 years old.

So, let's go with the law.

Is there...

There's no sufficient of authority over that 16-year-old and

legally they can choose to have sex with anybody they want.

Do you think it's problematic that poor and hub doesn't require age?

I don't think so.

I'm not speaking for that.

I'm not the both story-own, you know, your version, so I don't want to ask.

I don't want to...

Oh, I don't have a version.

It's just a fact.

Poor and hub doesn't verify age or consent.

Are you familiar with the work, you know, Dr. Alfred Kinsey?

Of course.

Yes.

Do you, you know, find his work to be instrumental

in shaping your views or modern sexuality framework?

Well, I think that he did the biggest...

The one of the biggest large-scale studies.

So, I mean, obviously, it opened the door to

looking at so many different aspects of sexuality.

He was the first really to...

Especially to look at.

So, I've back then called deviant sexuality or fetishes

or like people really were able to talk about the huge...

The range of sexuality out there.

So, certainly, he opened that door.

Poor and companies seem to have no interest in

protecting kids because they know it means less traffic.

So, in Virginia where they've passed a law to mandate age verification,

Poor and hub has chosen instead to shut down in the state.

A gamble made in hopes that Virginia politicians will give in and change course.

Parents could fight this by rallying a wave of legislation

in other states requiring age verification for porn

until it's impossible for companies like Poor and

Hub to do business without verifying age and consent.

Social media companies should face similar restrictions to

ensure miners aren't exposed to porn or exploited on their sites.

This is all in our control if the adults in the room stop putting

their porn viewing habits in front of child safety and do their job.

This generation also reports the highest uses of

birth control and psychiatric drugs we've ever seen.

A recent study showed use of birth control was linked with higher rates of depression.

I saw a statistic the other day that really bothered

me too, not just the failing numbers and academics,

but the absolute crushing levels of depression and despair.

This poll was on eighth graders and twelfth graders.

And we have near 50% level answering yes to questions like,

my life has no meaning.

I don't want to get up in the morning.

I don't think life is worth living.

This does not bode well for our future in this country.

We're taking away all of the things that throughout history have given life meaning.

Family, faith, a believe in personal achievement, a belief that you could

do things and that you matter and that faith matters and your family matters

and that your parents are looking out for the best for you.

All of those messages are being taken away and look at the levels of

depression and despair and just really just sadness and loneliness in our kids.

We're looking at a generation that is the most faithless we've had in America.

They report the highest levels of not believing in God that we've ever seen.

Are you afraid that that need to believe in something

is being replaced with worshiping, wokeness?

Yes, absolutely.

Several other people have pointed out especially during COVID when kids

are spending so much time online and the messages that they're getting.

And a lot of times the natural feelings that kids

have during puberty or twin years where they're

uncomfortable in their body or they're feeling

lonely or they feel like nobody likes them.

They're finding this group online who are telling them, well that's because you're

trans or you're this and your parents don't understand you but will be your family now.

And it's disturbing that there are many teachers and

counselors who are trying to then affirm these confused

kids as opposed to years ago you would find your group

in your neighborhood or in your family or in your church.

Now they're being told that the answer to these

feelings is to somehow be medicalized for a lifetime.

These kids probably aren't being told that once you go down

that path you're a medical patient for an entire lifetime.

And they're a slave to Big Pharma.

Yeah, the alternative is being a slave to

Big Pharma in a different direction being put

on anti-depressants at a super young age

instead of dealing with whatever the problem is.

And maybe there's an argument that some kids may need some sort of

pharmaceutical intervention in some rare cases and stuff but I think most of

the problems people in my generation, your generation dealt with, if

you were sad or something like that, these were dealt with in real life.

You didn't pop a pill to fix it.

It was human interaction. It was going outside.

It was changing your environment, exercising, all types of different

things, try to deal with the problem first before you jump to that.

And it seems like we're putting kids on these

tracks that all end with either Big Pharma

or some sort of woken-dever that's supposed to push them in the direction of leftism.

If we look at cultural Marxism or socialism throughout

history, it always ends in authoritarianism.

It always ends, as you know, from Cuba,

bloodshed, China, Matt under Mao, Pol Pot, Russia.

Once you sort of break down the family unit and

you break down the things that make life meaningful

like traditions and like values and faith that it

becomes very easy for governments to take over.

They also report the highest levels of depression, mental

health issues and lack of faith in God that we've ever seen.

It's never been clear that this generation desperately needs God,

something to believe in and an aspirational goal for their life.

Some might bristle at calling this a war on children, but

let's go through a checklist. In wars there's propaganda.

And I don't think anybody can argue that propaganda isn't being used.

There's weapons used to mutilate people.

Look no further than the images of surgeries being

done on kids today to confirm that that's happening.

Wars have soldiers willing to kidnap, maim and destroy for their ideology.

And wars have victims.

We have to use our voices. Use our levers of power. Take risks,

set boundaries. Be willing to be unpopular or called a prude.

Embrace family and traditionalism. Embrace the olds that

the modern redguard of wokeness wants you to reject.

Embrace the outdoors and human connection. Embrace monogamy and

marriage. Embrace being your child's leader, not their best friend.

Your kids need you. And so do kids who don't have anyone fighting for them

because there's one thing about this war on children that we haven't discussed.

Wars have winners and losers. If evil wins then all of our kids lose.

The question we face now is whether good or evil will win this war.

Who wins is up to us? It's up to everyone of you.

Will we make changes to save our own children?

Will we wake up friends and families do the same?

Will we return to a time where adults did their

greatest duty of protecting childhood innocence?

Will we begin to truly hold predators accountable with long prison

sentences or the death penalty instead of slaps on the wrist?

Will we rise to the occasion or be a footnote in history where the winning

side of evil laughs about our naive silence as they indoctrinated our kids?

The choice is ours. We can choose to be warriors for

children or bury our heads as the next generation

is influenced by people who hate our values, hate

our faith and hate the foundations of our country.

We choose to raise warrior children and to be

warriors for our children. What do you choose?

The enemy is closing in, it seems there's no way we can win

A generation lost and drowning in our sin

We've built these gods of gold

Now the common for the young and old

To take our power and control

Turning us to stone

Silence led to apathy

Cowards living comfortably

Just thinking of ourselves

Just doing what was easy

We can't go back, we can't rewind

It's gone too far, they've crossed the line

These mountains are coming down

We're standing on crumbling ground

And we go down

And the land is flying

Until we have no more enemies to fight

Yeah we go down

And the land is flying