Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
On Capitol Hill today, a bipartisan call for more government transparency on
UFOs, or as the military calls them, unidentified aerial phenomena, UAPs.
The objects have been detected essentially where all operations, Navy
are being conducted across the world. The technology that we faced was far
superior than anything that we have currently or that we're going to have in
next 10 to 20 years.
Unidentified aerial phenomena are a potential national security threat.
and they need to be treated that way.
The United States government has gathered a great deal of information
over many decades, but has refused to share it with the American people. That
wrong, and additionally, it breeds mistrust.
I spent 11 years in the U .S. Navy as a fighter pilot. For 18 years, I flew
fighters for the United States Navy.
I spent 20 years working in the U .S. intelligence community.
I served as the fourth director of national intelligence. I spent 25 years
senior official with the CIA.
I retired from the Navy as a one -star admiral after 32 years of service. I
worked on highly classified UAP programs for the government as a senior
scientist. I've spent 32 years in and out of government in national security.
I've worked 28 years as an astrophysicist on highly classified UAP
the United States government and for the defense industry.
I'm a professor in the Department of Pathology at Stanford University School
Medicine. And for the last 10 years or so, I've been working with the
of Defense and people in the CIA on the UAP topic.
I've come to the conclusion that we are not only not alone in the universe.
But we have been discovered by an intelligence from some other part of the
universe. There's evidence we are not alone.
Humanity is not the only intelligent species in the universe. We're not alone
the universe. It wouldn't be so arrogant to suggest there are no other forms of
life out there.
Humanity is not the only intelligence in the universe.
UAPs are real, they're here, and they're not human. There are other
intelligences that have highly advanced exotic craft interacting.
with the human population.
They are here.
This is real. It's happening.
It's happening now.
Non -human intelligence exists. It's been interacting with humanity and it's
been doing so on this planet for a long time. We are not the only intelligent
life form in the universe. There's something here on the planet with us
intelligent and more intelligent than us. This is the biggest discovery in
history.
My name is Lou Elizondo.
In 2009, my life changed forever.
That's when I was recruited into a highly sensitive government program that
investigated unidentified aerial phenomenon, UAP, also commonly known as
My work for the U .S. government goes back almost 30 years to when I joined
U .S. Army.
From there, I had the good fortune of being recruited into various programs
within military intelligence.
During my career, I served my country around the world managing and directing
missions, including counter -narcotics, counter -espionage, counter -terrorism,
and counter -insurgency.
And it was later in my career that I actually began running special access
programs for the U .S. government, and in some cases reported directly to the
White House and the National Security Council.
My name is Jay Stratton, and for over 16 years, on behalf of the U .S.
government, I worked as a senior intelligence official on the
aerial phenomenon topic.
I joined the Army at the age of 17 and left for a career in military
intelligence with eight combat deployments, including Iraq and
After the Army, I joined Naval Intelligence, and then I transitioned to
Defense Intelligence Agency, where I was the Chief of Air and Space Warfare
inside of the Defense Warning Office.
It was at the DIA that my colleagues and I started getting reports of what are
now called UAP. We went all over the government, the Pentagon, every
intelligence agency, anywhere we could think to try to find the UAP program,
assuming there was one. As far as we could tell, no one in the United States
government had a UAP program. So my colleagues and I began a new program,
ultimately became AATIP, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program,
AATIP.
The funding for this effort was sponsored by then Senate Majority
Senator Harry Reid.
And together, myself, Jay Stratton, and our team, for nearly a decade,
investigated UAP incidents around the world.
Based on hard evidence and data, we learned that UAPs present serious
security concerns and a potential existential threat.
Simply put, transmedium crafts.
Vehicles that have the capability to operate in space, air, and
water, and seemingly defy all that humanity knows about physics, have been
operating with complete impunity around the world since at least the 1940s.
At AATIP, we had access to some of the most sensitive videos in the Department
of Defense inventory. If you could be in my shoes...
and see what I've seen in folks like Jay Stratton, there would be zero shadow of
a doubt that these things are real and they are not made by humans. The things
that I've seen, the clearest videos, the best evidence that we have that these
are non -human intelligence remain classified.
The classified data that we had access to when we joined the program was
indisputable. There's 80 years of this data that the public isn't even aware
I have seen with my own eyes non -human craft and non -human beings.
For 23 years and 10 months, I was in the United States Air Force as an A -10
pilot. And while I was at NORAD, I witnessed an event that I will remember
forever.
There was an unknown object we were tracking on radars and the commander.
says, I want that target. That means intercept it. Fighters all the way down
eastern seaboard were scrambled.
And none of the fighters were successful in intercepting or running it down. We
were unable to maintain air sovereignty over North America.
On November 14, 2004...
We were on board the USS Nimitz, which is a nuclear aircraft carrier.
I was the most senior person in the squadron flying.
I had launched off Nimitz to do an air defense exercise off the coast of San
Diego, California.
And I ended up chasing a UAP known as the Tic Tac UAP.
It was about 40 feet long, and just sitting there in space, you can kind of
it start to accelerate, and as it gets in front of us, it's gone.
This thing was doing 32 ,000 miles an hour. So obviously that technology is
the United States.
As we were watching this Tic Tac object maneuver in this bizarre way,
it was obvious that it wasn't conventional. This was defying those
physics, laws of gravity that as pilots we live and die by. We literally had
these things docking Navy vessels on deployment.
The frequency in which UAP were being reported to us was increasing.
They were ubiquitous. We were seeing them nearly daily out there.
And then we actually almost had a midair with one of these objects.
This now became a safety issue.
Two aircraft from my squadron were flying out in close proximity to each
in section formation, so about 150 feet apart or so. One of these objects went
right in between those two aircraft.
right past the lead aircraft, and the lead aircraft was able to visually see
object, and he simply described it as a dark gray or a black cube inside of a
clear sphere.
To be clear, non -human intelligence has been actively conducting ISR,
intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance, of some of our most
.S. military facilities and nuclear sites.
They have both deactivated and activated nuclear weapons with both the United
States and Russia. The nuclear weapons that were activated in Russia were
pointed at us. And from that perspective, the stakes really could not
higher.
This is an emerging and disruptive threat for the United States and truly a
national security concern.
And by the way, this isn't just happening here in the United States.
happening all over the world and it's occurring with greater frequency.
When I met Lou Elizondo in the Pentagon, he made me aware not only that this
phenomenon was real, but it was an ongoing, persistent phenomenon.
The Secretary of Defense didn't know, the Congress didn't know, senior
policymakers didn't know, and nobody was doing anything about it other than Lou
and a handful of colleagues.
I was shocked and I was stunned, and immediately...
was concerned about intelligence failures that have occurred in the past
disasters that have ensued and determined immediately to do whatever I
help get Lou to the Secretary of Defense to move that information forward.
Each time Jay and I and others tried to raise the alarm bells and bring this
issue up to the appropriate level, we were met with fierce resistance.
The stigma alone and the taboo of the topic, the historical association of
was something that for most people in leadership positions was too big of a
to swallow. In fact, the stigma was so strong that people either believed, A,
the topic wasn't real, or B, the stigma was going to somehow taint or
tarnish their career so they didn't want to touch it. We couldn't get the
leadership in the Pentagon to look at the actual scientific data that showed
that there is a strong national security threat.
They were more worried about the impact on their reputation than they were about
the safety of the nation.
On top of that, we were shocked to find we were getting pushback from people in
the Pentagon based on their religious beliefs.
There really were religious fundamentalist extremists within the
had a severe adversity to this topic. These are national security experts,
senior members of the national intelligence community who are putting
religion above national security.
A senior DOD official actually stopped me in the hallway in the Pentagon and
told me that we were doing the devil's work. I had to deal with people who were
senior to me who were telling me... In their world, these are demons, and we
poking demons and messing in Satan's world and all these other things that,
me, I was like, I can't believe this is coming out of your mouth. I'm briefing
about an advanced aerospace vehicle that has been detected on multiple sensors
that's absolutely there, and you're telling me that you think these are
and that we shouldn't even look at them and study them. My mind was blown.
While we were trying to overcome all of these hurdles, we discovered another
deeply hidden and much larger UAP program.
This program was so sensitive that it was withheld from the
Secretary of Defense, Congress, and even the President of the United States.
This program is referred to as the Legacy Program.
This program had been capturing, retrieving, and reverse engineering UAPs
at least 1947.
On numerous occasions, these retrievals included the bodies of non -humans,
some sort of intelligence, intelligent being that is not human.
When Jay and I began knocking on doors and trying to get access into the Legacy
program, there was this almost like an immune response.
by the Legacy Program, and antibodies came out of everywhere to try to shut us
down. We began communicating with scientists involved in the Legacy
their leaders, when they learned of this, shut it down aggressively.
Not only were we met with fierce resistance and stonewalling, we actually
people angry at us that were even asking the question itself, as in, you know,
what right do we have to inquire about the Legacy Program, despite the fact
we were running AATIP? Put yourself in my shoes.
I'm conducting investigations of ongoing UAP activity, and there's this legacy
program that has at least 80 years of information that could help us better
understand this problem and protect national security, and they refuse to
it to us.
When it became clear that we couldn't work through the system, I knew from
experience having worked with the Senate Armed Services Committee what it takes
to move this oil tanker. Think about this.
immense, immense ship that has massive inertia.
And you're trying to get it to change course. When it comes to the Department
Defense, only Congress has the wherewithal to do that.
And the way to get Congress's attention is first and foremost through the press.
I knew we had to get the press engaged, to help get the Hill engaged, to then
get back.
to changing the Defense Department to study this problem to figure out, is
a threat? Where are these things coming from and how do they work?
As government employees, we're not allowed to talk to the media.
So Lou and I strategize on how to overcome this hurdle.
There were really only two choices.
The first choice was make peace with silence and sit on what is humanity's
greatest secret, all the while keeping Americans in the dark.
Or two.
I could resign my position in protest and fulfill my obligations to the
people by telling the truth about what I know about UAP.
There was this difficult moment where Lou had to decide, do I throw in
the towel?
Do we give up on this? Do we ignore this?
Or does he fall on his sword?
I couldn't nor would I ever reveal classified information, but I knew that
could say just enough at the unclassified level to make the media
government officials aware of the reality of the UAP topic, then Jay
would be able to use that momentum to go ahead and achieve the goals that we set
out to achieve inside the government.
And we had a number of difficult conversations because Lou was giving up
very... promising career he loved what he was doing he was very good at what he
was doing it's such a profound life decision for lou to make
for himself and his family during one of my routine hellish commutes back home
as i was stuck in traffic looking in front of me and behind me and seeing
thousands of cars i had this profound sense of isolation a feeling i had never
felt before in my life a feeling that that i was completely alone i might as
well been living on the dark side of the moon none of these people around me in
fact no one anywhere had any idea of what was actually going on around them
not a clue i thought to myself these individuals
deserve to know the truth, the mere fact that we're not alone in the universe.
How can any one organization, institution, religion, or government
or censor that or gatekeep that?
No one has the right to keep fundamental truths away from the American people
and humanity.
CNN has learned the Pentagon had a secretive program to research UFOs. The
existence of a secret government program to investigate UFO sightings. A recent
report by the New York Times unveiled the existence of a real -life X -Files
department. Their secret government program to investigate mysterious flying
objects. This seems potentially like one of the biggest stories of my lifetime.
These aircraft, we'll call them aircraft, are displaying
that are not currently within the U .S. inventory nor in any foreign inventory.
This is a very serious national security issue. Something is in our skies. It
has been there for quite some time.
If you have objects that are doing things, maneuvering in ways without any
obvious sign of propulsion, my submission is that what we are looking
truly... By definition, exotic technologies beyond next generation
And the bureaucracy in the Department of Defense really limited our ability to
keep leadership informed of what we were seeing.
As soon as the media started paying attention, Congress started paying
attention. I started getting calls from the Hill for briefings. Senators
received a classified briefing about UFOs at the Pentagon.
Senator Mark Warner, who is the vice chair of the Intelligence Committee,
look, I think it's important that the military is taking this more seriously
than they did in the past.
Senator Rubio and Senator Warner, to their great credit, put national
above their own personal political careers and took the risk of engaging
publicly on this issue.
When they began to engage, the Defense Department had to admit to the world
this was real and it was happening. And that immediately took the entire
credibility of the issue up a huge notch.
The U .S. Navy has finally acknowledged that videos appearing to show UFOs
flying through the air are real.
Commander David Fravor describing it like a 40 -foot long tic -tac. The
to hover over the water and then start a vertical climb from basically zero up
towards about 12 ,000 feet.
and then accelerate in less than two seconds and disappear is something I had
never seen in my life.
We've had repeated instances of something operating in the airspace over
restricted nuclear facilities, and it's not ours, and we don't know whose it is.
That alone, just that statement alone, deserves inquiry, deserves attention.
deserves focus.
If you have objects in the sky that you cannot identify, that's a problem
because it could be China, it could be Russia, it could be any adversary.
Well, any explained phenomenon could pose a natural threat.
That's the way you have to treat those things. There's something violating our
airspace. There's something fouling our ranges that even the people we've tasked
in the executive branch to understand this cannot...
provide an explanation.
So I would say, in addition to the national security implications, this has
implications for basic trust and confidence in the American government.
We just simply don't know the origin of the phenomena.
And we're going to try to get to the bottom of it because for national
purposes, some of these have been in areas that we train.
These have been in areas where we've got some of our best equipment, and yet our
best equipment has not been able to tag these things. We've not been able to go
in and catch them. No matter what they are, they're invading our airspace, and
we don't...
know exactly why they're doing it, what their intent is, and what their
capabilities are.
In addition to the national security concerns, this violation of all -nation
sovereign airspace presents a safety of flight concern for all military and
civilian aviation.
And the even scarier thing is that the Federal Aviation Administration stopped
using radar to track our air travel. They only track aircraft.
predominantly commercial and civilian, that are squawking. So they're actually
putting a signal into the system saying, here's where I am.
The only way they know the UAP are there is if the pilot sees something and says
something.
The fact that the FAA is not tracking UAP is putting American lives at risk
every day.
I'm Brett Fetterson. I served as the Director of Aviation Security in the
National Security Council.
and as the acting director for the Federal Aviation Administration's
Security Programs Office, I can say through my experience that we are
not alone in this universe.
The biggest thing that concerns me with UAPs is the national security concern.
It's the unknown. It's the fact that this technology does stuff that we can't
do. And if we can't figure out what it is or what it wants or what it's being
used for, it keeps me up at night in the idea that we're behind the power curve.
We want to be able to maintain the cutting -edge technology and the
here in the United States so that we can sleep comfortably at night and feel the
safety of what the American government has provided. There's sort of, I think,
four hypotheses out there, one of which is that this is foreign adversary
technology that we simply don't understand or weren't aware of, and that
amount to probably the biggest intelligence failure in modern American
The second of which is that this is a robust counterintelligence program to
cover up for a U .S. government effort that has fallen kind of away from
congressional oversight.
A third hypothesis is obviously that this is interdimensional or
extraterrestrial. And then fourth could be a combination of the previous three.
Some of the biggest strategic blunders in human history. The foundation of
blunders were a lack of imagination. The belief that an adversary or whoever
could not do something because it had never been done before. The U .S.
it was safe for those ships in Pearl Harbor because we didn't think that the
Japanese could get there, much less have torpedoes that could navigate such a
narrow strait and hit these ships until they did.
We never thought in our wildest dreams.
that terrorists would strike us in the homeland by training for a year to
pilots and then hijacking commercial aircraft and crashing them into
And they did.
So the thing that always keeps me up at night, something in the human psyche
that says, I don't have time or energy to sort of prepare for the unforeseen or
what I've never seen done before.
And, you know, that leads to strategic surprise and sometimes strategic
surprises that change the course of human history.
There was one classified briefing that I gave to members of the House and Senate
where I took military pilots to tell them the story of their encounters with
UAP. Those stories left them so rattled that they had trouble sleeping that
night.
The United States' most trusted military servicemen and women and irrefutable
data from our intelligence collection systems have been observing UAP for
decades.
Everything observed can be categorized by five distinct performance
characteristics. At AATIP, we call these the observables.
The first observable is hypersonic velocity.
Our current fastest aircraft can go roughly 4 ,600 miles per hour. However,
the UAP we are observing are traveling at 40 ,000 miles per hour and sometimes
faster.
The next observable is instantaneous acceleration, the sudden change in
velocity. At full speed, the SR -71, known as the Blackbird, requires roughly
half the state of Ohio to complete its turn.
What we are seeing with UAP are vehicles that can make immediate right -angle
turns, instantaneously accelerating and stopping on a dime.
at speeds up to 10 times faster than the SR -71.
If you're in a sustained fight, you can get up to 7 .5 Gs. It gets physically
painful over time to be under that amount of gravity. And that's just going
0 to 200 miles an hour in about 2 .5 seconds.
Now think of going 0 to thousands of miles an hour in less than a second,
the force would be on your body. The human body can only take so much before
internal organs start to separate themselves from everything they're
which is usually bad.
Even if it was a drone, it would rip the drone, the unmanned vehicle, apart.
The next observable is low observability. All modern technology
signature.
For example, most aircraft leave visible contrails as they fly.
We usually hear a sonic boom associated with the sound barrier being broken.
UAP, however, leave almost no observable signatures.
Our airplanes actually throw out exhaust behind it and thrust behind it to push
it forward.
Whatever these things are, they're not doing that. There is no exhaust, no
particles coming off of them that we can see.
The next observable is transmedium travel.
UAP have been observed operating in space, in air, and underwater.
And they are moving seamlessly through each of these environments without any
normal signature and without compromising performance.
We've observed a transmedium capability of these phenomena to move from space to
the atmosphere to the ocean.
In the Aguadilla, Puerto Rico case, a DHS helicopter caught the spherical
flying.
It entered the water and exited the water, so transmedium, without losing
velocity. It goes into the ocean and makes no splash or wake at 74 miles per
hour. I calculated how much force you would require just to propel a
under the water at 74 miles per hour, and you would need a Bezos 7 rocket
or two Learjet engines. That would churn the water up like crazy. So this is a
technology that's frictionless.
The next observable is anti -gravity. UAP seemed to be defying the natural
effects of Earth's gravity without any obvious means of doing so. No signs of
propulsion or lift, meaning no wings. No control surfaces or ability to
maneuver. In 2014 to 2015, we were operating off the coast of Virginia
off the eastern seaboard.
It was during this time that we upgraded our radar from the APG -73 to the APG
-79 radar.
And this allowed us to essentially see more objects we weren't expecting to
And there's a particular case of one of these objects maintaining a complete
stationary position inside of 120 -knot winds, essentially inside of a
hurricane. We're all going against the wind. The wind's 120 miles to the west.
Look at this thing.
It's rotating.
It just seems like they're not affected by the environment the way we are. They
were tracking them from above 80 ,000 feet.
So for those that don't know, above 80 ,000, that's where you start getting
space. So these things were coming down. They would sit for like three hours,
and they would go back up, which to my knowledge, we don't have anything that
has the capabilities as far as the energy required to come down, hang out
three hours, and go up. The observed UAP capability exceeds that.
of even the most advanced human technologies that are developed in
black programs.
From our exposure, I mean, there's nothing we have that comes close.
There's actually a sixth observable, which is not a flight characteristic.
That is biological effects.
I got started working on this actually in this office.
There was a knock at the door, and two individuals who represented themselves
being with the CIA in an aerospace company came to me and asked for my
They had data of military personnel, intelligence officials, and others
associated with the Department of Defense who had direct interactions with
and because of that direct interaction, suffered some kind of medical harm.
They wanted my help to look at the so -called inflammatory secondary events
might be measured in the blood.
Anything from the...
horrific burns that i've seen on some of the individuals that leads to secondary
problems with autoimmune diseases and sclerosis etc and then the internal
scarring that i've seen on some individuals these people had scarring
their bodies and inside of their brains and if you think about it you know if
you get too close to the back end of a jet engine or for instance if you get
close to the transformer system that is powering your neighborhood
There's energy coming out of those things. I mean, those are just human
technologies. Now imagine you've got something which is a more advanced
technology, which is generating some kind of field that allows these objects
move. You can imagine if you get too close to it, you're going to get harmed.
I spent 10 years as an intelligence officer for the Navy, and before that,
years as Air Force intelligence.
And I spent time on the UAP task force.
I'm one of the intelligence officials that has experienced biological effects
encountering UAP.
Since my first encounter, I've observed other craft
or we'll call it exotic energy fields.
Unfortunately, those of us who have investigated it... We become part of the
investigation or investigated by our colleagues. The population had about a
mortality rate within seven years of having an interaction.
Probably important that the public understands that this is more than just
aerial phenomena.
When you have an anecdote that is accompanied by medical data, that's
that I can hand to another scientist, another doctor, and say, here it is, you
explain it. We can argue about what the conclusion is, but we can't argue that
the data is real.
The Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence, who understood the
concerns of UAP, directed me to start quietly building out a whole government
interagency effort that ultimately became the UAP Task Force.
This new program was much bigger than AATIP ever was. Our mission was to
analyze, and catalog UAPs that posed a threat to U .S. national security.
I had hand -picked members from all 16 agencies of the intelligence community.
The Secretary of Defense formally announced the UAP Task Force in August
2020, naming me the first director.
Everyone in authority was paying attention to this topic.
One very distinctive moment for me was briefing then Secretary of Treasury
Mnuchin. I got through my briefing, and at the end of the brief, he sat back in
his chair, and he said, you know, Jay, you may wonder why I asked for this
briefing. And he said, What are the economic impacts of the president going
the microphone and telling the world we're not alone?
I have to think about those kinds of impacts in order to prepare if the
president were to make that move.
Meanwhile, Chris Mellon and I were working with the Senate behind the
craft UAP legislation that was then.
taken by Marco Rubio and pushed into the coronavirus relief bill.
When President Trump signed this legislation into law, it then forced the
Pentagon and the UAP task force to provide written reports to Congress,
classified and unclassified.
The long -awaited Pentagon report on UFOs has finally been released.
The director of national intelligence just a few days ago released a new
on 144 sightings. When we talk about sightings, we're talking about objects
have been seen by Navy or Air Force pilots or have been picked up by
imagery. Frankly, there are a lot more sightings than have been made public.
report clarifies that most incidents over the past two decades are not from
U .S. military or other advanced U .S. government technology.
So the issue now is, why are they here, where are they coming from, and what is
the technology behind these devices that we're observing?
As noisy as that first unclassified report was, it barely scratched the
The few elected officials that actually got to read the classified version of
the report, it really opened their eyes to the national security concerns
surrounding this topic. There's enough obvious evidence here that we need to
take this seriously, not downplay it. I don't believe they're coming from
foreign adversaries.
If they were, why, that would suggest that they have a technology which is in
whole different sphere than anything we understand.
And frankly, China and Russia just aren't there.
And neither are we, by the way. They say trillions of gas. galaxies out there,
so who knows what might have developed somewhere else. Does the United States
believe that there may be life outside of Earth?
What we believe is that there are unexplained aerial phenomena that have
cited and reported by pilots, Navy and Air Force, that these phenomena have,
in some cases, had an impact on our training ranges, on our pilots' ability
fly, train, operate.
You can stay ready.
That alone makes it a national security issue worth looking at.
We don't know.
We don't have the answers about what these phenomena are.
As we continue to make progress, a very powerful disinformation campaign
began.
This effort was to destroy my reputation and credibility.
Full stop.
When the government started running this despicable disinformation campaign
against Lou, I actually received an email one day from the Pentagon Public
Affairs Office with this narrative that they were providing back to the media
that was completely false.
And I replied also to that email and said, this is wrong. And they ran with
anyway.
They actually told the American people that Lou Elizondo did not work there,
that was an outright lie.
My family and I suffered greatly for it.
All you have in your life is really your credibility and your work.
It's heartbreaking.
They don't want anybody that's based on facts being involved in this. So what do
they do?
They go online and try to belittle.
Elizondo and me and anybody else that's trying to do it a scientific way.
As hard as it was, I was still being privately encouraged by former members
AATIP to continue the fight. And so that gave me the motivation to continue to
press forward. And the fire that we started continued to spread. After
of public denial, the Pentagon now admits there's something out there.
And the U .S. Senate wants to know what it is.
UFOs, unidentified flying objects, are real. The government has already stated
for the record that they're real. I'm not telling you that. The United States
government is telling you that. There's footage and records of objects in the
skies that we don't know exactly what they are. What's your viewpoint on what
these objects that seem to defy all laws of physics are?
Well, first of all, that's a legitimate question now. There are lots of
mysteries out there. It should keep us humble.
There's a lot of stuff we don't know.
There have been sightings all over the world. And when we talk about sightings,
the other thing I will tell you is it's not just a pilot or just a satellite or
some intelligence collection.
Usually we have multiple sensors that are picking up these things. There's
always the question of...
Is there something else that we simply do not understand that might come
extraterrestrially? I think it's a bit presumptuous and not arrogant for us to
believe that there's no other form of life anywhere in the entire universe.
I've seen some of those videos from Navy pilots, and I must tell you that they
are quite eyebrow -raising and might in fact be some type of phenomenon that
is the result of something that we don't yet understand.
And that could involve some type of activity that some might say constitutes
different form of life.
We don't know if the non -human intelligence that is already here is
extraterrestrial or perhaps some sort of crypto -terrestrial. Some people who
are into...
The physics of time travel thinks, well, maybe they're time travelers. Even some
sort of proto -human that somehow branched off from the human family tree
ago and is as natural to this planet as we are. Some ancient civilization that's
sequestered away somewhere on the Earth or on the seabed.
We've heard testimonials from pilots as well as civilians from different
countries having seen things come from the ocean.
Unexplained things. And these aren't missiles. They aren't rockets. They
aircraft or submarines.
These are otherworldly things that are performing maneuvers that haven't been
seen. In fact, we have tracked UAP underwater going at speeds in excess of
several hundred miles an hour, but without the associated signatures.
I retired as the oceanographer of the Navy, being the senior advisor for the
chief of naval operations in the Pentagon.
Our knowledge of the ocean is rather limited. We haven't even explored 80 %
the ocean volume.
We have mapped the surface of Mars and the moon to a higher resolution than the
Earth's seafloor. Is it possible that whatever we're seeing isn't from out
there? It's from down there.
Are we looking at an entire world?
underneath the water. I think it's very safe to say that with so much of the
ocean volume unexplored and the sea floor unmapped, that if any intelligence
were to arrive here and not want to be detected, it would stay in the ocean.
All these possibilities could come with different intentions and motivations.
Whoever it is, they're here.
And they're operating here.
And they have been operating here for a long time.
In 2022, we started pushing Congress hard to hold public UAP hearings. And
that's when disclosure started to get to the next level.
A House panel is holding a public hearing.
on mysterious flying objects.
The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee describes this as one of the
great mysteries of our time. And it's a big day for all of these people who have
spent so many years pushing for more transparency into this topic. Out of
everything in Congress and everything happening currently in our country and
world right now, the UAP topic has been one of the only topics that's received
this level of bipartisan support.
It's just not an issue, at least as of yet, in this country that lends itself
some sort of partisan or ideological divide.
Democrats and Republicans just want to understand what's going on.
This hearing and oversight work has a simple idea at its core.
Unidentified aerial phenomena are a potential national security threat, and
need to be treated that way.
UAPs are unexplained. It's true.
But they are real.
They need to be investigated.
and many threats they pose need to be mitigated. There is something there
measurable by multiple instruments, and yet it seems to move in directions that
are inconsistent with what we know of physics or science more broadly.
There are a number of events in which we do not have an explanation, in which
there are flight characteristics or signature management that we can't
We know there are service members...
have encountered unidentified aerial phenomena.
And because UAPs pose potential flight safety and general security risks, we
committed to a focused effort to determine their origins. The
systems, processes, and sources we use to observe, record, study, or analyze
these phenomena need to be classified at appropriate levels.
We do not want, we do not want potential adversaries to know exactly what we're
able to see or understand or how we come to the conclusions we make.
Therefore, public disclosures must be carefully considered on a case -by -case
basis. The hearing was a historic bipartisan effort towards transparency,
left both the American public and Congress with more questions than
While I was making progress, I learned that the legacy program was quietly
behind the scenes pushing back, and they were creating bureaucratic hurdles.
They were somehow able to block the funding that was approved for the UAP
force. I can't describe it any other way than I was just angry. There's this
hidden hand that is blocking all of these actions and things that I'm doing.
A subversive government overriding the real government. It's so bad that we
really aren't going to make progress until someone shines the light on them.
And then the staff and the members start to dig in more.
They begin to understand the landscape.
They begin to understand how much secrecy there is, how much resistance
to coming clean on this.
As Congress began hearing from whistleblowers in classified settings,
to the realization of the existence of the legacy program.
The main players in the legacy program have long been the Central Intelligence
Agency, the United States Air Force, the Department of Energy, and major defense
contractors. The Central Intelligence Agency is responsible for the oversight
the overall effort.
You might think of them as a little bit of a headquarters element.
The Deputy Director of Science and Technology at the CIA controls the UAP
retrieval portfolio.
The United States Air Force is responsible for field operations.
These are the folks that are responsible for deploying within moment's notice
anywhere in the world to go secure and retrieve crashed UAP.
We have intelligence teams quickly notified if there's some UAP event that
involve a crash vehicle or pieces from a crash vehicle.
The United States Air Force uses their own special forces, but they also
coordinate with other special forces in the other branches of the U .S.
military.
They're so well organized that they basically can get to a site, gather
material, whatever it is, and once it's in their possession...
They have the authority to classify it and therefore make any information about
it unavailable to the public, even admission that it exists unavailable to
public. The defense contractors, they're responsible for the exploitation and
the reverse engineering and analysis of the materials. They provide technical
and advisory services that the government doesn't have.
And last but not least is the Department of Energy.
They are the world's experts in anything that is related to either atomic or
nuclear technology or anything that gives off radiation.
But there's another advantage because the Department of Energy has its own
security classification system well outside the overview and oversight, if
will, of traditional classification systems like the Department of Defense
the intelligence community.
They've used the security and classification.
in the Atomic Energy Act to hide the legacy crash retrieval program.
The intelligence officials that have briefed on these crash retrievals have
talked about a number of different species having been observed to be
with the crash.
The bodies recovered are not all the same type.
I'm aware of at least two advanced non -human species.
one of which made contact with the Legacy Crash Retrieval Program, the
which the bodies were recovered by the Crash Retrieval Program in various
crashes. One of the questions that's often raised, if they're so advanced,
are there crashes?
But of course, I mean, you know, cars are well made and people drive them
carefully, but there are crashes. It can happen.
Another option that's being considered is that maybe some of these were not,
quote, really crashes but that they were left here for us to examine in
order to advance our technology forward at a faster pace so in that sense they
can be seen as gifts from more intelligent species one of the questions
would then be raised would be well are gifts distributed differently among
different nations or more or less homogeneously to see who
survives and makes progress to pass this.
It could be a giant IQ test, you might say.
As we brought whistleblowers to Congress, we learned that the legacy
involved in a long -running secret war with other nations to collect and
engineer vehicles not made by humans.
In this secret theater of war, the U .S. has both allies and adversaries in a
winner takes all scenario.
This is a very complicated geopolitical landscape where alliances and
allegiances shift like sand in the desert.
We would certainly prefer a situation where the retrieval is either
in international waters or some other uncontested location, or maybe in an
allied country, but every country in the world would do everything in their
power to try to retrieve an exquisite piece of technology.
The first country that cracks the code on this technology will be the leader
years to come. This is similar to the Manhattan Project. We developed the
weapon, we won the war, and it made us a superpower for almost a century now.
This is the atomic weapon on steroids.
Some of the craft could be the result of, say, our legacy program.
Or, on the other hand, it might be the result of advancements made by potential
adversaries. We have seen...
Highly credible U .S. government intelligence on the Soviet recovery of a
crashed UAP in 1989. They recovered a tic -tac -shaped UAP that was twice as
as the tic -tac that was encountered by the USS Nimitz carrier strike group, and
they did recover four bodies of humanoid aliens.
The Soviet scientists took apart the recovered craft and discovered...
a very advanced directed energy weapon.
China is at the top of everybody's list of concern right now in the Defense
Department. Some of this UAP activity we are seeing here in the United States
may actually be a result of a Chinese UAP reverse engineering program.
If Xi Jinping had access to this, if Putin had access to this, and they
that we did not have access to similar capabilities than what they did,
Do you think for a second that they wouldn't consider using it to achieve
ends of domination?
And if their approach to it is driven by science and a desire to match what they
think is ours, we'll wake up one day and realize, I don't know how they got
there, but they got there ahead of us and now we're screwed.
This technology can absolutely either revolutionize the way we do things or
completely destroy everything that we know.
It often reminds me.
of the famous speech by President John F. Kennedy when we were right at the
threshold of entering into a new era of discovery in space.
There is new knowledge to be gained and new rights to be won.
And they must be won and used for the progress of all people.
For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of
its own.
Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man.
And only if the United States occupies a position of preeminence
can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of
peace or a new terrifying theater of war.
So secret, there have been very, very few people in our entire government that
have been allowed or provided access to it.
Some presidents have been briefed on the basic facts about the situation, but
they are not provided with all the details.
I think there's this assumption that presidents can walk in the Oval Office
day one and say, all right, take me to Roswell, show me the alien bodies. I
to see the video of the autopsy. I want to see the whole thing, open it up. I
think that really is a naive.
understanding of how our government works.
Even presidents have often been operating on a need -to -know basis.
That's certainly true from a historic standpoint.
The rationale, the justification was the president shouldn't know about these
things because that way the president always has deniability.
All they need is a nod in this direction or in that direction. But that begins
to ramp out of control. Frankly, I don't even know if the president would know
who to ask.
You could go to the director of the CIA, nowadays the director of national
intelligence, and ask them. And even that person may not know because those
people rotate.
But the people, three layers underneath them that are there for 30 years, to
them, it's like I've seen these people come and go. I have no obligation to
them it exists.
It just never percolates out. A lot of people have this assumption that the
director of CIA is right on to everything and knows everything. The
CIA is a political appointee.
Quite frankly, they're temporary help. Whereas the director of science and
technology at CIA, this is a career intelligence professional.
That's where you're going to put the program.
I had a few private conversations with former President George Herbert Walker
Bush in 2003, in which he told me that when he became the CIA director in the
Ford administration, he was not briefed.
on the legacy UAP crash retrieval program, but he later found out about
he informed me that there were a number of crash retrievals that had taken place
since the mid -1940s. And he also informed me of a UAP event that took
Holloman Air Force Base in 1964, where three UAPs approached the Air Force
One of them landed on the tarmac, and a non -human entity
de -boarded the craft that landed and interacted with uniformed Air Force and
civilian CIA personnel.
And when he asked for more details, he was told that he did not have a need to
know.
I served over 30 years as an Army Green Beret in the United States Army. I ended
my career as Secretary of Defense.
official decided i the acting secretary of defense did not have a need to know
about the uap topic several of my colleagues participated in a panel
by the george bush administration when the administration contemplated going
public with disclosure what it was a group of 10 or 12 people from
agencies from the military some business people and they said here's what's
going on the americans The Russians and the Chinese all have crash -retrieved
craft from some other civilization. And there's some belief at this point that
maybe this should be revealed to the public. And we want to know, well, what
would the consequences be?
This is a topic that has the potential to create serious ontological shock to
society. It's not just national security.
It's psychological.
It's sociological.
It's... theological, and it's philosophical.
It's undermining, in many ways, it's troubling to a lot of people to say that
there's something else out there. Is it either otherworldly, interdimensional? I
think, unfortunately, it goes against our traditions, our cultural traditions,
our religious traditions, and it challenges the beliefs of a lot of
The Vatican has irrefutable evidence that non -human intelligence exists,
although publicly they don't want to acknowledge it.
Privately, they are very well aware of this.
What happens when society realizes everything it's been taught about the
history of our species has been wrong, and everybody learns all at once that
we're not the top of the food chain, we're not the alpha predators?
It would be a shake -up for institutions,
it'd be a shake -up for norms, it'd be a shake -up in society.
One has to be careful and one has to remember that it's conceivable that
something that's so disturbing or disruptive or negative that there is a
rationale for not immediately disclosing all of that information.
We actually came up with a list of 64 areas that really would be impacted to
some significant degree by such a disclosure.
When we add up all the numbers, it looks like this would be kind of a bad idea.
Did you go through the secret files, the UFO document? Now that you're out of
office, you can do anything you want, right? True, yeah.
But I'm not telling you.
Without a doubt, there's hardly been any program that has been so successfully
kept out of the public eye as anything like crash retrievals of unknown craft.
This line...
of strong control started, at least in the Truman administration, with the
Roswell crash.
In AATIP, we learned that the UAP event at the U .S. Army airfield in Roswell in
1947 did actually occur.
It was described to be a boot -heel -shaped UAP that broke into two pieces
impact.
And observers saw what looked like hieroglyphics or some type of writing on
You might describe them as runes or glyphs, hieroglyphs, that were actually
the craft itself.
And within that crash, non -human bodies were recovered.
Four non -human bodies were recovered from the UAP crash at Roswell.
The recovered material from the crash, including the bodies, were all sent up
Wright Field, which is now called Wright -Patterson Air Force Base.
That's where the U .S. had their best reverse engineers.
Think about the context for everything in 1947.
The U .S. had just won World War II and was entering into a Cold War with the
USSR.
These UAP presented a technology of unfathomable power.
It was imperative that the U .S. be able to reverse engineer this new technology
before anybody else or before anybody else even knew about it.
You can't tell your friends without telling your enemies.
That's a key component to every decision as to what we do or do not release.
Back in 1947, when they looked at this and they realized it was real and they
realized they had no idea what it was, this was something you couldn't just
about because...
The role of the President of the United States and the role of the military is
to defend the United States and to protect its citizens.
If this is something that they can't protect against, well, they're not going
come out and say it. They're not going to scare anybody.
They don't want to tell the American public about the threat because there's
nothing they can do about it.
It was only a couple months after Roswell that President Truman signed the
National Security Act of 1947, which established both the Air Force...
and the Central Intelligence Agency.
That was the start point in which both the CIA and the Air Force began to take
operational control of the UAP topic. But it wasn't until a couple years later
when Truman signed the Central Intelligence Agency Act that really
endorsed the CIA to be able to run secret intelligence operations outside
normal routine oversight channels. Basically, be able to run operations
anybody knowing.
From Roswell on, the strategy for dealing with the public and ensuring U
secrecy is maintained was to basically adopt the strategy of deny everything,
admit nothing, make counter accusations, put out false narratives, intimidate
and discredit witnesses. In essence, deny, deny, deny, establish stigma
surrounding this topic in order to prevent any type of disclosure.
Executive Order 12333 bans covert action to influence the public and the media,
but the Legacy Crash Retrieval Program has been ignoring that. In fact, they
aggressively influencing public opinion by using an active disinformation
campaign. To create the tradition of disbelief, where you basically start
early, that, nah, nah, everybody who sees UFOs are crackpots.
And then that gets built in, you know, to the media enterprise. It gets built
into Hollywood. It gets built into the public. CIA funded Hollywood movies in
order to create that ridicule factor that they still use to this day.
Do you believe that the recent spike in UFO encounters... I get the UFO
question? Come on, man.
I'm not...
I'm just, you know, I loved E .T., the movie, but I'm just going to leave it
there. Up until very recently, there was zero incentive for a naval aviator to
come forward and say, this is what I saw. And honestly, up until very
there was zero incentive for a U .S. senator to talk about it because people
would think, what's wrong? This guy's a weirdo. Over the years, military service
members, intelligence officials, and even private citizens have been
and made to look crazy.
to the point where people have lost their jobs, they've lost their ability
provide for their families, they've lost their security clearances.
These people had their lives ruined simply because they spoke the truth
what they learned or what they saw.
People that come forward with this, I feel like they've taken their life in
their own hands.
People say, well, government can't keep a secret. Well, there are a number of
programs I've been involved in that have never.
gotten revealed. The truth of the matter is people and programs can be kept
secret. Usually it's just out of personal wanting to protect oneself.
This is the most successful disinformation campaign in the history
government. The irony in this is that the deception campaign to create stigma
was so successful, it actually inadvertently created a new unforeseen
Stigma has been a tremendous problem that is actually a national security
to the United States. Other countries are not suffering from the stigma that
are. So we are already, as Americans, at a disadvantage.
How can we expect to maintain a strategic advantage when 99 .999 % of
scientists here in this country don't even think it's real. Science moves
forward on the basis of exchanging information, and when it's all tied up
held down, you just can't make progress.
You had information being locked away that, frankly, could improve the lives
every human being on this planet and change the trajectory for species.
This information was and is still being locked down by the Legacy Crash
Retrieval Program.
Too much information resides in different stovepipes.
It's controlled by different baronies and different fiefdoms spread throughout
the national security kingdom.
They each view information as power.
They're each reluctant to share information. They hoard it. They like to
it like a currency.
All of these things conspire to prevent us from getting the big picture and
bringing the information together.
any or maybe just a tiny number of uh reports of uap notwithstanding
the fact that the air force controls the north american aerospace defense
command they're responsible for space surveillance they have aircraft with
superior radar systems operating in the same training ranges where the navy is
seeing and reporting these aircraft and yet They claim they don't have evidence
of this.
Imagine we had a situation where we're saying there are unidentified submarines
off the coast of the United States, and the only reports we got were from the
Air Force, and the Navy had nothing to say about it.
During the George W. Bush administration, the president routinely
his ranch in Stevensville, Texas, and I see reporting of UAP activity over the
ranch.
F -16s from a nearby Air Force base were alerted to intercept this object.
People on the ground thought.
So I go down and I start asking questions. Hey, what did you chase? I'm
on behalf of the U .S. government and we're trying to understand what you saw.
And they looked me in the eyes and said, Jay, we cannot tell you what we saw
because the OSI, Air Force Office of Special Investigations, came in here,
us sign nondisclosure agreements.
We did see something. We did scramble on something, but we can't talk to you
about it.
Historically, every time a military member had a UAP encounter, it was very
quickly swept under the rug and they were discouraged from talking about it.
They put a form down. It was a nondisclosure form.
He came storming across to me and said, don't you ever say that again. You're
never going to speak of this. And I made it very clear that it's something we
shouldn't be talking about and just keep our mouth shut. There was a culture of
silence. I didn't talk to anybody about it, not my wife, not my colleagues, not
people I knew. I just shut up. There's ramifications if you were to divulge any
of this information to anyone.
We received an alarm at our closest missile site.
There was an object directly above that ICBM nuclear missile, right on top of
the blast door.
No noise, no sound whatsoever, and it looked like a mini sun sitting in the
It was the size of a super Walmart building.
Not just a Walmart, I mean a super Walmart. This thing was gargantuan. And
it could suspend itself was just completely unnatural to what we know of
anything that can fly or hover.
The captain was looking, just looking up with his mouth open, and I look up and
I see this object right over the missile launch tube.
Multifaceted, matte black finish, an oddly shaped diamond.
Absolutely silent, made no noise. There was no means of propulsion.
Fifty feet up in the air, sitting absolutely still.
And it was amazing.
We kind of looked at one another and we're just human beings witnessing
something extraordinary. And while we're watching this thing, it went from dead
still and it shot off toward the horizon and was gone.
Absolutely instant acceleration.
We had 60 cameras so that the engineers at Boeing and Douglas could see every
millisecond of the ignition.
The missile in question that we photographed was an Atlas D carrying, as
an experiment, a dummy nuclear warhead.
As it was flying along, the warhead, the shaft, something else entered the
frame. It sent a beam of light and hit the warhead, flew up like this.
Shot another beam of light down at the warhead. Went like this, shot another
beam of light at the warhead.
Went under here, shot a beam of light at the warhead, and then flew out the way
to come in.
All the while, everything in our frame was moving along at 8 ,000 to 9 ,000
miles an hour.
There's nothing in there for us that could have done that.
Could have done that.
There was this red -orange light hovering above the front gate.
It was about 40 feet in diameter, sort of oval shape.
And each missile was announcing guidance and control system failure. Our
missiles were starting to go down, so we had all 10 of them go down.
Within the span of eight days, we lost 20 nuclear missiles to UFOs.
Vandenberg is home to...
the infrastructure that supports our national missile defense project, the
system that defends our country from incoming ballistic missiles and nuclear
weapons. So it's one of the most important bases we have.
On October 14, 2003, I showed up to work at Vandenberg Air Force Base, and
immediately everybody just started to tell me about this UFO incident that had
happened earlier that morning. I reported for work at Vandenberg Air
We were given a briefing earlier in the day, some Boeing contractors.
had witnessed a UAP incursion. Three Boeing contractors had called in and
reported that a gigantic red square object was floating over the launch pad
low altitude. It was making no noise.
It had no obvious signs of propulsion, and it was just hovering silently.
It was a very serious security breach of the area.
And we were told just to be vigilant when we were out on our shift that
And I spent most of the day driving around the base looking for these
Later that night, myself and five security forces members, we observed a
light approaching the base. As it got closer, the light was no longer visible,
and it was massive, the size of a football field, almost rectangular in
It was just floating there, no propulsion system, no windows.
It was matte black.
We observed it for another 45 seconds, and then it shot off.
thousands of miles an hour up the coast.
I talked to all the direct witnesses, over a dozen people, and even from their
different vantage points, they all told the same story. They all saw the same
thing. The UAP activity surrounding nuclear weapons is not a historic issue.
It's an ongoing issue.
Despite the long -standing denial by the United States Air Force, we now have...
Both former and current very senior Air Force officials stating for the record
that in fact the Air Force has had a long -standing involvement in UAP.
I served in the Air Force for about 32 years.
And my last job in the Air Force was Chief of Air Force Intelligence prior to
becoming Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
When I served in the Air Force, there was an active program to track.
anomalous activities that we couldn't otherwise explain. Many of them
with ranges out west, notably Area 51.
As Congress learned more about the legacy program, they realized how
and influential the defense contractors have become.
As we look at the actual structure,
of the interaction between the government and private industry in this
Over the years, it has morphed, transitioned into it being largely in
of the contractors.
If you do something within the government, eventually it can be
Freedom of Information Act. But if you do something through contractors,
not. available through Freedom of Information Act. I had been involved
projects where we made sure that the material was under contractor labels so
that it couldn't be accessed easily by the public.
But what happens with government, you need continuity. People move, people
people retire.
And so what winds up happening is you have these legacy efforts going on in
government contractor side involving UAP. And then I, the government official
charge of this program, leave.
and someone else takes my place and that person might have a little bit of
awareness that this project existed but then they're replaced by a third person
who has no idea the project existed but the corporate entity that received this
technology is still trying to develop it and so they begin to commercialize that
some of the stuff begins to seep out and these great innovations that some
companies coming up with and making money on and they claim it belongs to
and it's proprietary and the people in government who know where it came from
originally
They're long gone, and their successors have no idea that it was there at all.
And so you can start to foresee where you create in corporate hands an
extraordinary amount of power. The real risk that in transferring technology
that is not useful to us today to a corporate entity, over decades that
corporate entity comes to basically possess and control access to it for
own purposes, not for the purposes of national security.
In the councils of government, we must guard against.
the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought,
military -industrial complex.
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will
persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or
democratic processes.
The reason why our democracy is so strong, because it's of the people and
people and for the people. It's not acceptable to have secret parts of
government that no one ever sees. It would be unconscionable. It's against
Constitution, and it's wrong.
Non -human intelligence is not government information, and the
not be keeping that knowledge from the people.
Before he passed away, I had the privilege of seeing Senator Harry Reid
few times in his private residence.
He explained to me that he was once provided information on the legacy
but denied access. He was incensed by that. And when the opportunity came to
sponsor AATIP, he jumped at the opportunity in order to ensure that
the government had visibility into this topic.
And frankly, we wouldn't be where we are today if it wasn't for the courage of
Senator Harry Reid. Why the federal government all these years has covered
put brake pads on everything, stopped it.
I think it's very, very bad for our country. Shouldn't we study this stuff?
The answer is yes.
And that's all this was about.
For decades, our government assumed there must be different exotic
responsible for each of the observables.
But our scientists realized one breakthrough technology could actually
responsible for everything.
With enough energy, you could create a bubble, a warp bubble, around a
spacecraft that would have a different property of space -time inside the
than on the outside of the bubble.
This energy field would completely isolate the craft from the environment.
So you might ask then, how does the craft actually move forward within its
bubble? The craft inside the bubble has a way of altering the bubble's
properties in order to change its direction of motion.
Such that you have a downward press in front and an upward press behind.
So it'd be like riding space -time in the same way that a surfer would ride a
wave in the ocean.
And we observe hypersonic velocity and instantaneous acceleration.
And the reason is that time is moving differently for people inside the bubble
versus people outside the bubble. Whoever's inside the craft would feel
they're just cruising along. They wouldn't be feeling the effects of what
like speeds and accelerations that would turn a human being into pudding.
This one breakthrough can be the key to interstellar travel, where you want to
travel long distances without taking enormous amounts of subjective time.
We'd also have low observability because the bubble acts as a barrier between
two space -time environments.
This would eliminate or conceal most of the known signatures of conventional
technology. This is why radar would have difficulty tracking a craft, because
the signal from the radar would be distorted by the energy field around the
craft. The radar signatures literally just move around the bubble and doesn't
reflect back to the radar emitter. So it's not surprising when someone takes a
photo of a UAP, they finally get a... fuzzy and distorted picture because
they're actually taking a photo through a space -time barrier.
What's been happening recently is that we have upgraded our sensor systems on
our fighter aircraft.
And these images that are now picked up with our advanced sensor systems, we can
begin to see the actual structure of the energy field around the craft, which in
the past they would not have been able to do.
We also observe transmedium travel because the craft is moving within its
space -time and the outside environment through which it's moving is
inconsequential. This would allow a craft to go seamlessly from space
the atmosphere and into the water.
And they could do so because the warp bubble that surrounds them shunts air
molecules or ocean water molecules around the craft so that it could move
effortlessly through any medium.
We also observe anti -gravity because the Earth's gravitational field is no
longer having any effect on the craft inside its space -time bubble.
This is why a craft does not need, say, engines or wings or...
other aspects that we would associate it with a craft that needs to fly in the
atmosphere. It's really disconnected from the atmosphere.
And the energy field associated with these craft causes a highly energetic
of radiation, which is why people getting too close to UAP can experience
biological effects that are harmful to humans.
Now that we understand that these craft exist in...
a space -time environment that's different from the exterior space -time
environment. This can begin to explain claimed observations by, say, military
people who have approached and gotten into a craft and find that time is
at a different rate inside the craft than time running outside the craft.
They think they're only there for a few minutes, and they come outside the
craft. Some hours have gone by, so they feel like they've got missing time.
Or similarly, with respect to the size of the craft, if someone is outside the
craft and looks like a small craft, and they go inside, it's the size of a
football stadium. Once you've realized that space and time are being engineered
to be different, inside the craft than they are outside the craft, then these
anomalies that people report that sound completely absurd can actually make
sense.
The top issue is what is their energy supply?
because the evidence for how much energy they're using per unit time so exceeds
any kind of power levels that we can generate.
UAPs have exhibited propulsive performance characteristics that imply
generation of 1 ,100 billion watts of power. This is more than 100 times the
daily electrical utility power generated in the U .S. Let that sink in.
100 times.
the daily power generation of the entire nation.
There are two prevailing hypotheses for how UAPs create the energy that warps
space -time around them. And one is that the spacecraft can produce its own
bubble of vacuum energy around the craft, which is also known as zero
energy. And the other one is that The craft could be using quantum
to draw on a remote distance source of energy.
If we can understand the technology that we're observing, it has so many
potentially beneficial impacts, including clean energy.
We're seeing these craft doing unbelievable things, and it's not
engineering.
This is technology that could replace oil, gas, and coal, and protect our
planet for future generations.
How can we use these technologies and all the capabilities that might come
it, not to fight a war, but to increase our standard of living, to increase our
ability to get from place to place? We can talk more about teleportation. We
could talk more about hypersonic travel. Being able to take human beings to the
next evolutionary step, which is the stars. Being able to explore new star
systems and planets.
On the other hand, you'd have to weigh the consequences of sharing with the
world, knowing that there are bad actors out there. If our adversaries would
have access to that same technology, they could flip that into some very,
powerful weapons of mass destruction.
You could put a nuclear bomb inside one of these things and let it fly, ride it
through a building, through concrete, through steel, wherever you want it,
anywhere in the world. We want to talk about it publicly and encourage folks to
talk about it.
While we're talking about it publicly, our adversaries are paying attention to
context clues, to piece things together about possible technologies that we may
have that they don't have access to. So it's a fine line.
I would opt for making any new energy source a humanitarian
issue, that it should be open.
And we know how to do that. We've done that with nuclear power. If the
capabilities that exist...
come to the forefront and they become known to the world, it might very well
that it is to the benefit of mankind.
While Congress had learned a great deal about the legacy program, whistleblowers
were still afraid to reveal the most secretive details about the UAP
and non -human bodies in the program's possession.
We've been interviewing folks that would have had evidence of or first -hand
direct contact with either materials or a program itself.
They have worked on craft, out -of -this -world origin.
But until they leak a video before they commit suicide
by shooting themselves in the back of the head four times, I just don't know
that that's going to get out.
Those people whose job it is to make sure information doesn't get out will
whatever tool they can find to try to convince people they shouldn't come
forward. We have people that have very high clearances, both today and in the
past, who did really important work for our government or continue to do
important work for the government, who have come forward with some claims about
the U .S. having in the past recovered exotic materials and then reverse
engineered those materials to make advances in our own defenses and
And that they signed agreements that...
They would face jail time or, in some cases, some people claim it would cost
them their lives if they spoke out about these things. When I have a
whistleblower coming forward telling me that they are in fear of their life and
that people have been hurt protecting and hiding this information, that gives
reason for concern.
Determined to get to the truth, it was Chris Mellon who led the charge to help
Congress draft unprecedented UAP whistleblower protections.
And in December of 2022, President Biden signed the legislation into law.
So even for those who signed NDAs, they still have a right and an opportunity to
talk about this in a very healthy and productive way that informs the American
public.
Bombshell claims from a military whistleblower. UFO wreckage recovered by
.S. kept classified by a secret government program for decades.
The UAP task force has refused access to a broad crash retrieval program.
Retrieving non -human origin technical vehicles, you know, call it spacecraft
you will, non -human, exotic origin vehicles that have either landed or
I handpicked Dave Rush to be part of my UAP task force.
Everything that Dave uncovered is true, but it barely scratches the surface.
There's a sophisticated disinformation campaign targeting the U .S. populace,
which is extremely unethical and immoral. Have people been killed to
secret? That was an ongoing concern.
Dave has been working tirelessly behind the scenes with Congress as well. And
we were really poking the bear. We were making a lot of progress. We were
getting a lot of information to Congress.
And it wasn't necessarily symbiotic with the legacy program and their desires.
I remember one evening I was sitting with my wife on the front porch,
and I received a call.
I recognized the voice of a friend of mine, and he happened to be one of the
staffers on the Hill.
And he was very shooken up and said, listen, we had a very interesting
on the Hill.
extremely senior person in the U .S. government, in the intelligence
told Congress, for the record, that there was a committee of 27 individuals,
I'm not going to go into code names here, that were mulling over the idea of
using extreme measures to silence David and myself.
Kill us.
Now, people say, oh, come on, that's a conspiracy.
No, it's not.
We have done it before.
Under certain circumstances, we have killed Americans without due process.
If they are a clear and present national security threat, we can kill Americans.
Now, it's not done very often, but we can.
Without a fair trial, they just disappear, right?
So here I am.
If I wind up in a month from now floating in the Potomac somewhere, you
what happened.
You know what happened. This is the truth.
What else you want to know?
Last year, the House Intelligence Committee held a hearing on UAPs. They
in some Pentagon bureaucrats who only had two answers to the questions they
asked. I don't know, or that's classified.
This hearing is going to be different. This time, we had credible witnesses
testifying before Congress and American people under oath.
This was a tremendously proud moment for my colleagues and myself to watch the
fire that we started continue to grow. The subcommittee hearing on unidentified
anomalous phenomena, or UAPs, will come to order.
The reality is the American public deserves to know.
And you better be careful about a government that doesn't trust its
because there's no telling what they'll pull on you. It's really important that
we're hearing it in a bipartisan way.
to have this conversation, which really, to the heart of it, is about national
security. The American public has a right to learn about technologies of
origin, non -human intelligence, and unexplainable phenomena.
You solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help you God.
Yes, sir.
I was informed in the course of my official duties.
of a multi -decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program.
I am hopeful that my actions will ultimately lead to a positive outcome of
increased transparency.
We were primarily seeing dark gray or black cubes inside of a clear sphere
the apex or tips of the cube were touching the inside of that sphere.
Since the events initially occurred, I've learned that the objects have been
detected essentially where all operations, Navy operations are being
across the world.
These objects had been observed for over two weeks, coming down from over 80
,000 feet, rapidly descending to 20 ,000 feet, hanging out for hours, and then
going straight back up. It wasn't until 2009 until Jay Stratton had contacted me
to investigate.
Unbeknownst to all, he was part of the ATIC program and the Pentagon.
Are you aware of any individuals that are participating in reverse engineering
programs for non -terrestrial craft?
Personally, yes.
Do you believe that our government is in possession of UAPs? I know the exact
locations. I actually had the people with the firsthand knowledge.
provide a protected disclosure to the inspector general. Do we have the bodies
of the pilots who piloted this craft?
Biologics came with some of these recoveries, yeah. Non -human biologics.
Non -human. I was wondering if you could speak a little bit about the
interaction between defense contractor companies and any UAP -related programs
or activities.
The contractors, you know, are the metal benders, so to speak. They're the ones
actually... doing specific performance on government contracts.
How does a program like that get funded?
Misappropriation of funds.
Does that mean that there is money in the budget that is said to go to a
program, but it doesn't, and it goes to something else? Yes, I have specific
knowledge of that. Mr.
Graves and Fravor, in the event that your encounters have become hostile,
you have had the capability to defend yourself?
Absolutely not, sir.
No.
What we experienced was well beyond the material science and the capabilities
that we had at the time that we have currently or that we're going to have in
the next 10 to 20 years. We have nothing that can stop in midair and go the
other direction, nor do we have anything that can, like in our situation, come
down from space, hang out for three hours, and go back up. Is it possible
these UAPs would be probing our capabilities? Yes.
Yes, definitely.
Do you have any personal knowledge of people who have been harmed or injured?
In efforts to cover up or conceal these extraterrestrial technology?
Yes.
Personally.
Anyone been murdered that you know of? I have to be careful. I directed people
with that knowledge to the appropriate authorities.
There clearly is a threat to the national security of the United States
America. Brave witnesses here. They took an oath to uphold the Constitution of
the United States, and they're doing it.
And we owe them a debt of gratitude.
On Capitol Hill today, a bipartisan call for more government transparency on
UFOs.
One was asked about alien bodies. Two others talked about seeing UAPs.
The U .S. government operates a UFO crash retrieval program and has a UFO
the remains of, quote, a non -human or non -human pilot in it.
And when Dave Grush said the word non -human biologics, there was an audible
gasp. I worked with David Grush when we both contributed to the UAP task force.
And everything he said under oath to the Congress and what he put down in his
whistleblower complaint is 100 percent true.
A Pentagon report is detailing a dramatic increase in UFO sightings. The
Pentagon released its report on UFO sightings today, saying an additional
sightings have been investigated since 2021.
Now the Defense Department is admitting not just a couple of incidents, hundreds
of incidents, scores of incidents with multiple sensor systems, multiple
witnesses. A NASA task force is holding its first meeting on UFOs. NASA
commissioned an independent study team to examine unidentified anomalous
phenomena. And this is the first time that NASA has taken concrete action to
seriously look into UAPD. Are we alone?
Personally, I don't think we are. I wasn't prepared for the number of
that I see. This emerging capability outstrips the operational framework that
have to address it.
Since mankind first started developing atomic energy, there has been consistent
UAP activity at sites involved with the atomic and nuclear process.
We have evolved more technically in the last 80 years than we have in the
previous 200 ,000 years.
And the uptick in UAP activity has increased in line with our advancement
harnessing energy.
We realize we are on the path to exploiting the energy levels needed to
space -time, and UAP have been observing and clearly been interested in our
rapid progress.
Despite developing massively new technologies, we don't see an equivalent
moral increase in how we deal with each other.
We are still invading sovereign nations.
We're still threatening nuclear war 80 years after dropping atomic bombs that
vaporized hundreds of thousands of human beings.
Let's face it, we are a violent species.
So if I were a species from somewhere else...
even if I were a hidden species on the planet, who saw how we were coming up
this curve of atomic energy and nuclear energy and then began to realize
what it takes to do their kind of technologies with warping time and
space and so on.
I can imagine that could be seen as a threat to another species because they
would recognize that, well, it's only a matter of time and they're going to be
doing what we're doing and then we're going to have to deal with them. So it
doesn't surprise me that their highest priority would be to identify what
threats they might face and learn everything about them. This pattern of
activity seems to me utterly logical.
It seems to me to be the extension of the evolutionary process that governs
life. writ large as we know it which is self -preservation is number one when i
hear stories of either nuclear weapon sites being shut down or turned on what
that tells me is something quite interesting first off is that something
technology capable of reaching into our nuclear weapons systems at a distance in
ways that we don't understand okay that's just
But if you ask the question about intent, at the very least what it tells
that they're showing us what they can do to us at will or with us or they can
stop us. Now, they didn't stop us from blowing something up in Japan.
They didn't stop the first of the bombs.
So at some level, they're willing to let us see the consequences of our actions.
But at another level, they're willing to also show us that.
You might think that you could hurt us one day, but you can't. We really can
just reach in and stop you or cause you to blow each other up because at the end
of the day you're getting in our way and you're really starting to annoy us.
So even though it has been reported that some of our fighter pilots have chased
these objects and even fired missiles at them.
there has not been some kind of strong negative retaliation. So it would be
pretty easy to come to the conclusion they're friendly and that's fine and
there's no real threat there.
But the truth of the matter is you have to take into account, well, under what
condition that might change.
For example, if you have ants at the back of your yard, they're not a threat
you, so that's fine. But if they come and invade your house, suddenly they're
threat.
It could be the same in this situation. So at least within the defense and
intelligence industry, we automatically assume the worst because we want to be
prepared against the worst if it should happen. There's a concern within the
defense and intelligence communities that UAPs have been undertaking long
surveillance of human technological advancement for the possibility that
may need to intervene.
to prevent a conflict between us and them. One of the reasons that I am so
ardent about this issue is because I think it has the potential to change the
perspective and the outlook of world leaders and the populations of those
countries to see more of what we have in common and the challenges that we face
together. If we're going to survive as a species,
We need unprecedented levels of international collaboration.
I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish
if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.
Thomas Jefferson once said, I'm not an advocate for frequent changes in laws
constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress
of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new
discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions
With the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep
with the times.
Our current Senate leadership feels the same as our founding fathers.
And throughout the fall of 2023, my colleagues and I met with Senate
to help give them clarity on the facts as they fought for the most historic UAP
legislation we've ever had.
Never in the history of our nation have we ever seen any type of legislation
regarding UAP that is as detailed and specific and as directive as this one.
The United States government has gathered a great deal of information
over many decades but has refused to share it with the American people. That
wrong, and additionally, it breeds mistrust.
There is, we believe, information and data that has been collected by more
just... the Department of Defense, but by other agencies of the federal
government as well. Information on UAP has also been withheld from Congress,
which was a violation of the laws requiring full notification to the
branch. The bill I worked on with Senator Rounds offered a common -sense
solution.
The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act. This would be the most
aggressive measure that we've frankly ever seen in history when it comes to
disclosure about what the government knows and has as it relates to UAP. The
measure would also give the federal government control over all recovered
technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of non -human
intelligence eminent domain.
allows the U .S. government to take control of anything for national
reasons or for the betterment of the American people. A requirement as a
transparency measure for the government to obtain any recovered UAP material or
biological remains that may have been provided to private entities in the past
and thereby hidden from Congress and the American people. The eminent domain
section was not crafted.
It was designed to be put in there clearly to lay out our expectations.
Contractors may have information that they have held or materials that they
held over an extended period of time.
And this is our way of addressing it and making it clear that it should be
delivered in an appropriate fashion and that they need to be negotiating with us
now. Their bipartisan plan for more transparency is getting some major
though.
Defense contractors give money legally to a lot of my colleagues that provide
a great deal of the pushback on this. There's a lot of money coming from the
defense industry to support elected officials with their campaigns. And then
when the time comes for these elected officials to try to get to the bottom of
things, they're compromised.
Something with the capabilities of traveling light years, not showing.
A heat signature and the energy capabilities of that, that would put the
Pentagon out of business. We wouldn't be fighting these worthless wars overseas
over oil, and American boys and girls wouldn't be dying. It would put the war
pigs out of business.
Unfortunately, there was too much resistance, and the most historic
the proposed legislation did not become law.
We've got a big mess on our hands. We've got 80 years of lies and deception
that, quite frankly, ruined a lot of people's lives. And nobody wants to take
responsibility for that. This is not an endeavor here to go out and punish
anyone. But nonetheless, we would need to know what they've learned.
Taxpayers paid for this. And I think offering amnesty is extremely important.
Let the past stay the past, then collectively move forward. It's
keep working on our proposal.
I'd like to just acknowledge my dear friend.
the late Harry Reid, a mentor who cared about this issue a great deal. So he's
looking down and smiling on us, but he's also importuning us to get the rest of
this done, which we will do everything we can to make happen. But where there
was smoke, there was a fire. And Congress is now aware of it. And so what
allows us to do is circle the wagons and try again.
Welcome to today's historic hearing.
There are certain individuals who didn't want this hearing to happen because
they feared what might be disclosed.
I
do.
Yes.
Yes.
Excessive secrecy has led to grave misdeeds against loyal civil servants,
military personnel, and the public, all to hide the fact that we are not alone
in the cosmos.
The U .S. is in possession of UAP technologies, as are some of our
We are in the midst of a multi -decade secretive arms race, one funded by
misallocated taxpayer dollars and hidden from our elected representatives and
oversight bodies.
Now that we know UAP are interacting with humanity, we should not turn a
eye, but instead boldly face this new reality and learn from it. One of the
important actions that can be taken relative to exposing the truth of UAP is
combat the stigma.
NASA personnel stepping forward and participating in such discussions would
a powerful statement to the scientific community that UAP should be taken
seriously and researched accordingly.
To the incoming administration and Congress, I say to you, we need
public transparency.
And this hearing is an important step on that journey. The truth is out there.
We just need to be bold enough.
and brave enough to face it.
America wants their pizzas in 30 minutes or less, and that's about our attention
span. I think the legacy program is that they think that America will
draw its attention somewhere else, and I just don't think that's the case. I
think we've lit the fuse.
I think the American people are ready.
to receive the truth.
Sitting here in a Senate building, recognizing what change has
been occurring, I never thought I'd see this day come, frankly.
And now that I see it here, I am unbelievably hopeful that it's
going to filter down into our society.
to where everyone realizes that the human species is actually in a melting
of many species throughout the galaxy. What I expect to come out of that is,
first of all, a greater appreciation of what it means to be a human.
And to me, that kind of change on the human character is probably more
significant than what we can learn about.
atoms and molecules and propulsion systems, my grandchildren are going to
up taking into account and thinking about the fact that the universe is full
life. We're on the threshold of an entirely different understanding of the
universe and our place within it and technological opportunities and
possibilities that were the stuff of science fiction just a few years ago.
The people behind the Legacy program truly believe that the secret is so
that they can't share it with the American people.
There may be aspects of this that are so intense they can't share it. However, I
think the basic fact that we are not alone in the universe, we can share that
with the American people. We can handle it at this point.
Hopefully, one day, the American people will learn the bigger story and how it
impacts us all.
I want to tell the American people what I know.
But I can't because a vast majority of it remains highly classified. I feel
tremendous pressure to share what I can because I know there will come a time
where we all wish we had done things differently.
That moment is imminent.
And when that moment comes, I know people will say, I wish somebody would
told me sooner.
Remember, as far as we've come, We are still only just beginning the greatest
paradigm shift in human history, the age of disclosure.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.