Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
All right, here's week two of the weekly
hot seat episodes. You guys are getting
some good value out of this by the sounds
of things and it's good to see a lot more
submissions this week as well. So we'll
work through these from the top and get
through as many as possible and break them
all down and run through the trade setups.
So we'll start off with Nick here. Nick
submitted a few trades in this screenshot
but looks like he's highlighting the 1
.47pm trade. So he's ranked it as a B rank
trade with two confluences and here it is.
So 1.47pm you've got your trade here off
the previous day value low, overnight
value low and I'd actually rank this in A
setup Nick because you've got the
developing session value low as well and
it looks like you took your trade at 7
.33pm which is about in between the value
low of the developing session and then in
between those value levels just above. So
I really like this trade. It's about as
good a trade as you can get in terms of
confluences, three confluences lined up
and even better it's three value lows. So
previous day overnight and developing
value low which have broken past and below
and now retesting on the underside. So
that's a really good short setup but as
confident as you can get for a short
setup. Three aligning value lows broken
through and retested on the other side. So
really good trade selection on that. Just
the only thing I'd say to note for you is
this is an A rank not a B rank. You've got
three confluences there. So really good
trade selection. I know you didn't submit
these ones for the hot seat but I can see
you took some other good scalps here. This
one being more of a B rank trade. Single
confluence overnight point of control.
Quick scalp off that level. Same thing up
here. Quick scalp off the previous day
point of control. Both wins here and then
one loss. Looks like you shorted the
previous day point of control which was
correct. It did run down. Tickled your
take profit by one tick and came back and
stopped you out. So the only feedback I
could say there is maybe if you'd entered
that trade a bit closer to the value level
you would have hit take profit on that
trade. I can see you entered a bit further
down. So that's the only feedback on
those. Otherwise really happy with your
trade selection here around 147. Fantastic
trade. Great confluences. Three aligning
value lows equals a really really good
trade setup. So well done. Next one is
from Mr. Brad. Bradley Willington. Alright
so we've got two trade setups here. And it
looks like the first one here was a loss.
Second one was a win. So let's break these
down. Actually the same trade that Nick
took. Except he took both times. So the
first one here. It got traded through
right. So he went short from the previous
day value low and overnight value low.
Shorted those levels. The price ended up
breaking through. Back up to the previous
day's point of control. Before coming back
down. So nothing really you can change
about that one. That's still fantastic
trade selection Brad. Also a trade I would
have taken as well. Depending on how the
profile would have looked at the time. But
at the very least that would have been a B
rank setup. At the very least potentially
A rank. Depending on how the profile
looked at the time. The developing
profile. So nothing I would default with
that trade Brad. That's good trade
selection. Good confluences. I mean price
had failed off the point of control.
Failed off fair value. Broke below the
overnight fair value. And also broke below
the previous day and overnight value area
lows. So all good reasons to short. But
the market had other plans there. Pushing
back up to the previous day's fair value.
And current session fair value before
melting again. So nothing to fault there.
Just luck of the draw on that loss
unfortunately. But obviously second time
around. That trade there again. Still a
valid trade. Previous day value low.
Overnight value low. And developing
session value low. In fact the same trade
that Nick took as well. You guys took the
exact same setup there. So great trade
selection. Just the first time around
didn't work. Okay so nothing to fault
there. Both trade selection really really
good. But the second trade there. With the
developing value low. As added confluence.
It was just a perfect trade selection. So
well done on that. And no feedback on that
first one. Other than random luck. Next
one here is from Andrew. And Andrew hasn't
put down the confluences for his trades
here. But I can assume I can find them
here in the trade selection. But in future
reference guys. When you submit these.
Make sure you also list down what
confluences you're looking at. Just so I
have a little bit of context. But I can
see here with Andrew's trade. You've got
the previous day value area low. Overnight
point of control. Kind of stacked together
there. With the developing session point
of control. And then using the previous
day's point of control. As his resistance.
So trading back and forth here. Really
carved up the markets here. These are
really nicely done. Really nice scalps.
You can see he's bought at the developing
session point of control. Normally not a
great area to buy. Unless you've got
existing surrounding confluences. Which
you do here. Previous day value low.
Overnight point of control. And that point
of control of the current session. All
developed in that one spot. So you've got
three reasons to have support there. And
that's what he's done. Bought. And then
sold back at previous day point of
control. Which is as you can see. Perfect
spot to sell at. So buy sell. Then at the
top here he's then sold. And then bought
back at the same level he previously
longed from. And he's done it again here.
Shorting the top. Buying back at previous
day point of control. So great entries.
And great exits. Really good read on those
scalps. Then I can see down here. You went
to go buy at the overnight value area low.
And got a small little trade up to the
overnight point of control. So you traded
level to level. As well as the developing
profiles value area low. Level to level.
Exited that trade for a few points. So not
bad. And good timing on that exit as well.
Because that's where price also melted
back down below the value levels from. So
really good trades here Andrew. I can't
fault any of these. These are great
scalps. Level to level. You followed the
rules on the entries and the exits. And
overall just really happy with that for
trade selection. So well done on that.
Next one here is from Anim. And Anim's
trade here. It's trading the S&P. It's
ranked as a B rank. With two confluences.
Overnight POC. And high volume node. And
the trade taking about 20 minutes. So he's
expected price to come back to the
overnight value low. And current session
value high. When I saw that price used the
OPOC as resistance before breaking. I
decided to put a limit order in to the
expectation of it becoming support. So
he's expecting a broken resistance to and
support here. So let's have a look. And
here's the trade. So overnight POC. Yes
indeed. Broken to the upside. And then
used as support for a nice easy long trade
there. A nice in and out trade. So what
you can see here. I think you've made a
really good read on this trade. Seeing
that value develop up the top here. If you
guys remember from our earlier Q&A. That
when you see value developing right by a
value level like this. And there's no
quick downside reaction. But instead a
high volume node develops and accepts that
level. That's a good indication that price
is potentially going to break to the other
side. So seeing that value develop. You've
got the high volume node. Price had a
small reaction from the overnight POC. But
ultimately you made the right decision in
waiting for that breakout. Seeing that
value develop. Then price pushing to the
upside with very little resistance.
Pushing to the upside. And then your idea
of buying as a limit order right here.
Which is now on a B rank location. You've
got overnight POC and a high volume node.
Developed for a really nice entry. Minimal
drawdown. And a nice quick take profit
there as well. So really good read on
that. And seeing that price was extended
above the value area high of the
developing session. And back into value of
the overnight session. Really good call on
taking that breakthrough to the upside.
And then a retest. So that's really well
done. I would rank that. Obviously it's a
B rank. But I would rank your trade
selection there. A rank selection. Really
well done on waiting on that breakout.
Versus fading the level alone on a C. So
well done. Next one here is from Graham.
So this is the S&P as well. Time and
trade. Nine minutes. Ranking at a C. Maybe
a B. Confluence was trade was a retest of
the previous day value high. Reinforced
HVN below the level. Cool. Outcome win for
24 ticks. What did I do well? Correctly
read the retest of the PDVAH. Had support
from the high volume node. And read the
trend. Cool. Cool. Let's have a look at
the trade. So here's your trade setup. So
you took this previous day value area
high. Was broken through. Again similar to
that trade. What we just looked at of
Annam's trade. Seeing price develop this
at a value level. Without a quick reaction
to the downside. Is a good sign to expect
that breakout. So you have correctly
identified that. Upwards trend. Developing
volume node. Right below the level that
it's about to break out from. Price
inevitably breaks out. And you've gone and
taken that retest of that previous day
value level. And of that high volume node.
So that's really well done in your
selection. Take profit target being 801.5.
Really decent. I'm pretty happy with that.
You are correct on saying the high volume
node as resistance here. Could be a bit of
an obstacle for your take profit target.
But I'd say that with the trend in mind.
And with what just happened with the
previous day value area high. I'd say
you've got pretty good downside protection
here for your trade long. So it's not
something to worry about too much. You can
pretty confidently still hold this trade
long. Even with that resistance right in
front of you. And in saying that your take
profit target wasn't that far off it
either. More on the edge of that node. So
really well done on that trade selection.
I would not fault this trade. That's
really well done. Again a good hint guys.
If you're wanting to look for anticipating
a breakout versus a fade. If you see value
like this developing in a high volume
node. Develops right adjacent to a value
level. Before a breakout. That's a good
sign that price is potentially looking to
push higher. As the market is finding a
lot of interest at those price points. So
something to keep in mind. And really well
done on this trade. Very happy with that.
Great quality trades so far. Another one
from Graham. This one he's ranked as a C
trade. Confluence is developing value area
high fade. So that's the only confluence
here. Outcome loss of 20 ticks. Okay. So
let's have a look at the trade. Alright.
So here it is. He said he's faded the
value area high. Developing value area
high. And that was the only confluence.
And I can say Graham. These type of
trades. With the developing value area.
Unless it's clearly a D shape or an even
distribution profile. Ideally you want to
avoid just trading the developing profile
value highs and lows. These can change
pretty frequently. And aren't very
reliable as sole confluences. So I would
have personally avoided this trade
altogether. But it's good you've noticed
that and reflected on that. And were able
to identify. You know it wasn't the best
quality trade. So even if this was a D
shape or even distribution profile.
Ideally you want to line that up with a
surrounding confluence. And around here
there were no other surrounding
confluences. Until up here at your
overnight value area high. So overall this
was a trade that definitely could have
been avoided. So good reflection on that.
But just remember if you're going to use
the developing profile levels. Normally
best to pair that with a previous day.
Previous week. Or a previous session value
level. Versus just trading on its own.
Those trades are going to burn you more
often than not. Next one here is from
Brendan. Overall win. Two previous trades
I took where I moved my stop to break even
a little early. And got stopped out before
the move. Okay let's have a look. Okay
cool. So I can see a couple of trades here
Brendan. I'm not sure what the confluences
are on this short you made. Back down to
previous week's value low. Looks like you
tried to. Maybe there was a high volume
note at the time there. But depending on
what the profile looked like at the time
of that trade. Best to avoid taking trades
near the point of control. Looks like you
sold that trade above the previous week
value low. And above point of control. So
not sure where the confluence is on that
first trade. But maybe you can clarify
that. But other than that. That's a trade
that I would have avoided. Given on what I
can see on the screenshot. Second trade
here. You made a really good choice for a
B rank trade. High volume node from the
profile. That had been put in earlier. And
then retest of the previous day point of
control. So one. Two confluences. You got
short. And really good trade idea. That
would have been a really nice trade. But
like you said. Moved your stop to break
even too early. Definitely a psychological
thing to work through Brendan. As you
said. But otherwise really good trade
selection on that. That's great. Two
confluences. And a retest from the
underside. Really clean set up there. So
well done on that. Sick. The third trade
here. You took a previous day value area
low. With a bit of a high volume node. A
little shelf there on the profile. And
also the developing value area low. So you
have basically three confluences in this
area. You got long off the high volume
node edge. Which is exactly what you want
to be doing. And bought that back at I'm
assuming an arbitrary target. So happy
with that trade as well. You got that
reaction for that quick scalp. That would
overall be an A rank setup. Especially if
that value area low was there at the time
of your trade. As you can see. So one,
two, three confluences for a quick scalp.
Well done. So yes. All I'll do is like you
said. Work through that. Moving your stop
to break even too early. Work through
that. Even attempt just not moving your
stop to break even. We've had another
post. I can't remember who posted it. But
someone else had the same issue of moving
stops to break even too early. That's
something you might want to add in later.
Once your discretion builds. And once your
intuition builds up. After spending some
time trading this strategy. And purposely,
consciously observing the markets. Within
the framework of this strategy. Maybe
something to add later. Because moving a
stop to break even can be a real intuitive
type thing. Where you'll kind of sense and
know when you should do that. Versus just
letting the trade breathe. So one practice
you could do is just sizing down a bit.
And then letting your trades breathe
completely. Don't move that stop to break
even yet. Just let the trades play out.
And see them win. And you know build that
confidence. Before you start to add in
that intuitive skill of moving to break
even. Because there's no really hard and
fast rule. I know I like to use the 75% of
the way to targets. And then moving the
stop to break even is my personal rule.
But even then I don't do that all the
time. It's only when I feel like the juice
of that move has been squeezed already.
Will I then move to 75%. Move to break
even at 75%. So it's definitely more of an
intuitive thing. Versus a hard mechanical
rule. So for the meantime. You could
definitely experiment with just letting
those trades breathe. Okay Michael. Four
trades in the same area. All B-rank
trades. Price move from underneath.
Michael's overall question here. Is what
would have signaled me in the moment to
avoid at least two of the first three
trades. I feel like it's taken me too long
to read the market. Have been getting more
losses than I should due to misreads.
Okay. I felt there was a bullish strength
of the bottom to the P2POC level. Was
going long on the pullback to stack value
there is an enforced note. Okay. So this
one's a bit hard to see. It's a bit zoomed
down. But I can kind of get an idea for
what you're doing here. So it looks like
we've got the developing profile. The
value area low is down here. Your previous
day POC. Previous day value area low. Both
stacked. So you've got three stacked
levels here. Price has broken to the
downside and pulled back up to retest from
the underside. What I can see immediately
is it looks like you've gone long one, two
times. Initially you're longing into
resistance levels here. So that's the
first thing here. Michael is the fact that
price already showed it's willing to
travel outside of value to the downside.
It's traded below the previous day's fair
value. It's already well below overnight
fair value. And is now extended past the
previous day's value lows. So we're
trading deep into discounted levels with
no sign of any fighting back from buyers
on the way down. So the first issue I can
see with these trades is the fact that you
are buying into resistance. So yes, it did
push back to these levels. But ultimately
it's just pulling back into to retest this
value before continuing to the downside.
There was no indication of a confident
break to the upside which would cause you
to want to then use this as support. So
yeah, longing in this area here I would
not class as a good quality trade. So what
you should be seeing here is that when
price breaks away and confidently breaks
away from value lows, you're looking to
anticipate a retest and continuation as
price pulls back towards value. You're
initially going to look for a retest to
continue that move down especially when
price is shown. You know overall a bearish
trend. It's pushed through fair value and
through value levels retesting on the
other side and breaking down overall. You
want to follow that trend and because this
spot here was the perfect spot to look for
a short continuation. So don't buy into
the resistance levels as they've been
broken now. Support broke in terms of
resistance. So don't buy into those. You
had the better idea on that last trade you
took where you sold. You took the retest.
In the end they ended up taking that
retest and that's where you got your
winners from. As I can see from the next
couple of trades as well you ended up
taking quite a few runners on that trade
as well. So that's the idea. To avoid
those first two trades just reading that
context again bearish downtrend extension
away from value lows and pushing below
fair value. So you want to be looking for
that retest of value to continue the trend
versus trying to break back into value. So
last trade was really good. You had the
right idea there in the end. But again you
could have ended up taking that trade a
bit higher and getting an even more
favorable position had you had the same
idea in mind initially when it pulled
back. It's the perfect pullback. Perfect
area to enter for a short. So don't try
and predict the market breaking back into
value. Just trade what you see. If price
is clearly extended away from value to the
downside just go in line with the market.
Trade that. Look for that retest to
continue versus anticipating and trying to
predict a break back into value. Let's go
and count the trend. Stay with the trend
and enter where you get a good price to
retest that short as you eventually did on
that last trade. Next one's from Graham
again. These are a couple of trades. He's
attached to the Notion Volpro trade review
sheet. So that's cool. So we've got one
confluence, a C rank and here's the trade.
So yeah, previous week value area low
broken and retest and a four hour pivot.
Cool. That's a personal confluence of
Graham's. Not one I'm familiar with too
much but we'll take it into account here
as well. And cool. Gained 24 ticks. Okay.
So if we look at the trade here, he's
highlighting this particular trade. The
break from previous week's value low and
push down. Previous week value area low
broke to the downside. Graham's gone and
taken the retest and sell back down to
point of control. So good exit on that
point of control. Good target for your
take profit placement. And entry being a C
rank trade. A little bit risky but given
you understood the risk and you understood
it was a C rank trade going in. Nothing I
can fault there. You saw price fail off
the previous week value low. You took that
immediate retest and exited at the
developing point of control. So I really
can't fault you with that. It's a good
scalp. Good entry and good exit. So well
done. Next one's from Malik. Malik has a B
set up. One minute trade. Trade looked
good because we were below previous value
levels. So I was looking for sells. All
right. Let's have a look. Okay. So there's
your trade. You entered the trade at the
previous day point of control. Overnight
value high. And also above the developing
session value high. So that's quite good
Malik. You got a couple of good
confluences in there. And pretty clean as
well. You can see that level actually gave
a couple of setups like you said. So
really good trade selection. That's about
as clean as you can get for a B rank. You
could argue it's an even an A rank trade
being above the value area high of the
current profile being a sort of extended
level then heading into two resistance
levels. So really good trade selection
there. Nice move back down. Again
arbitrary targets. In hindsight it would
be nice to have a runner on this as well.
Seeing price fail off that previous day's
fair value. But other than that that's a
really good scalp. Really good selection.
Minimal drawdown. Can't fault this trade
selection. And good exit as well. Exiting
above the point of controls. So you had a
pretty safe run to take profit there. So
that's a really really nice. Good trade.
And last one here from Johannes. See
setup. Overlapping value high in previous
day point of control gave me the
confidence to get in. Missed the first one
so I thought I should dollar cost average
in to get it. But it didn't touch my
second limit 1.5 hour. Let's have a look.
Okay nice. So you've got your stacked
value levels here across this point. Price
is traded above those levels. And put in a
sort of high volume note across this point
here. Which is I assume where you got your
trade when price pulled back. You can see
there. So I assume that was a confluence
and you got your trade on the pullback. So
this is good. This is something I wanted
to highlight. Someone asked a question
earlier a couple weeks ago actually. About
what to do when there's a high volume note
plus the value levels. And say if the high
volume note is you know a decent couple of
points away from the value levels but sort
of in a similar area. What should you do?
Should you wait for price to pull into the
value level or trade the high volume note?
Well when the developing profile is
showing you there's a shelf of volume
across this point. A shelf of interest
across this point. And that's in front of
the value level. Ideally you want to start
building your position at the very least
when price taps the edge of that node. So
if you want to be play it safe you could
add one contract as price taps the edge of
that node. And then if price digs in
deeper closer to the value level then add
in the rest of your position at the value
level. Because a lot of the time the
market's going to react to the high volume
node or the market is more likely to react
to the high volume node versus the value
level once it's traded through that point.
Because this is the most recent the
market's most recent thoughts if you want
to say on the value level. So the market
here has broken through these value levels
to the upside and has already shown
acceptance here by building these value
these high volume nodes above that level.
So when price pulls back towards the value
level seeing this little pocket of value
this shelf right above kind of adjacent to
the value level would be the best spot to
enter versus waiting for that to pull all
the way back. So that's a really good
trade entry there. Really happy with that.
And obviously nice take profit taking
profit right at the edge of this larger
node to the upside. Great place to exit
because that's where you could expect
either some sort of retracement or a large
reversal back down into value. So really
happy with that trade. Well done good
selection and good choice getting in at
this point here rather than waiting for
price to come all the way back. The only
thing I'd say is your stop loss is a
little bit risky here because like we said
yes price should reverse at this high
volume node and should find support at
that level given that it's right above
this value point. But there is a chance
obviously it can still come back and
retest it as it has not retested that
level yet. So I would have had my stop
loss a little bit wider to give it room to
tap that point had price come back down.
But other than that can't fault you on the
trade selection on the entry that's really
good. Just be mindful of having your stop
loss on a value level. You're probably
more likely than not over the long run
going to get stopped out having your stop
loss placed on a value level like this. So
those are some great submissions this
week. Really happy with those trades guys.
Really well done. Trade selections looking
really nice. Hope you guys find this hot
seat segment really helpful. I'm really
enjoying doing these. It's good to run
through and keep the tools sharp for
myself as well. So I'll be posting up the
next one here. You can see the post that
this video is currently linked on. Submit
your trades for episode three and I'll see
you guys again at the end of the week.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.