Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
All right, we've got a 15-month-in update.
The 2-Hour Trader framework was released
about 15 months ago. I wanted to share a
quick update going over some of the stats
of the people that have passed through. So
since inception, since the material was
actually recorded and released in the
Traders Think Tank, we have had a little
bit over 500 people pass through the
material. What I found most interesting
about the stats here is that only 68% of
people actually went through all of the
material. So I was going through all the
stats kind of on the back end that I have
here, looking at some of the 2-Hour Trader
kind of back-end information. And yeah,
more than 500 people have purchased the
program. Only 68% completed the material,
which I found alarming and interesting.
And so when I was looking at some of the
actual lessons of people who did not
complete all of it, when I was looking at
what they actually went through, it was
very interesting. People were going
through the introduction, the risk
management, and then jumping through some
of the core lessons and just jumping right
into the real examples of the actual setup
when looking at the actual curriculum, the
2-Hour Trader curriculum. And I recorded
it in a way that you're supposed to go
through it piece by piece, lesson by
lesson. It's only 43 minutes. And so this
was a little bit surprising to actually
see these stats. And so I did make some
changes to the back end. So now the course
material does require you to go from start
to finish. You can't access any of the
prior lessons before actually watching the
one before. And this is actually, if
you're watching this live, I am pushing
this live in the think tank. If you're
watching this live, this is all going to
be recorded and posted as a lesson update.
So pretty interesting there. Now of the
500 plus people, a little more than 500
that have gone through it, I've only had
two people reach out to me and actually
complain about the program. And both of
them were unhappy because they already
knew it. They already knew the material,
which again, something else I found
surprising. Because if I, from my
perspective, if I had purchased something
from someone that I perceived to be, you
know, skilled at XYZ tasks that I wanted
to learn, and they taught me something
that I already knew, I would just see that
as a signal that, okay, what I already
knew is actually maybe even stronger than
what I thought it was. And it would just
give me more confidence in that thing. We
got those people taken care of, you know,
part of the program is, you know, I want
people to be happy with this actual
material. And so, like I said, in the, in
the write-up on the website, if you are
actually unable to be profitable with this
framework over 30 to 60 trading days,
reach out to me and let's jump onto a call
and actually see if you are applying it
correctly. Now, that takes me into the
most frequently asked question that I
actually get about the framework. And that
is how close is close enough to VWAP? So
when we're actually talking about the
signal, how close is close enough? So you
have situations like right through here.
This is obviously going to be an ideal
situation, right? Price is directly
overlapping VWAP. You've got a pretty nice
signal bar right through there, bearish
engulfing with a little bit of a wick
above it. So almost like a shooting star
as well. But as we know, or as you may
soon discover, it does not always unfold
this way. It does not always happen that
way. And one of the quick examples that I
found was actually in ES yesterday. So,
you know, sometimes price is going to
unfold like this and you're going to have
a gap between the actual signal and VWAP.
What do you do in these scenarios? What do
you do in these scenarios? So what we have
to remember here is that the framework is
based off of price actually testing VWAP.
You want to have that signal ideally
overlapping VWAP like we saw with this NQ
setup. This is like a textbook setup and
I'm going to cover this here in a couple
of minutes. But I want to talk about this
frequently asked question here first. What
do you actually do in these scenarios?
What we have to remember is that in these
scenarios, because this is a short setup,
right? So your signal is there. Your entry
ideally is right there. And your target is
down here. Now, when price is far away
from VWAP and we're kind of deciding
whether or not we want to take the trade,
we have to remember that the risk point is
still going to be way up at VWAP. So you
just have to decide, is the risk still
worth it at this particular point? What
you don't want to do is find yourself in
an entry. Like we see right through here,
entering here, and then price ends up
bouncing and you take your stop right
through here. And then it actually
respects VWAP. That is not a good
situation to find yourself in. And that's
not really following the framework because
the framework is based off of how price is
responding to VWAP. Now, if you want to
modify it and kind of say, I'm going to
trade, you know, this lower high as kind
of a market structure play based on
something else, you can do that. But
again, if we're talking about the actual
two-hour trader framework, it's based on
how price responds to VWAP. So any
situation that you have where price is far
away from VWAP. Let's use an extreme
example. Let's say, you know, this is your
signal bar, right? And we're talking about
actually taking a short position there. We
think it's close enough. Our risk point is
now way up here. So you have to consider
that the, and this, you know, because of
the magnitude of this move, this may still
be a favorable to our plus trade. But we
have to consider all of this open risk up
into VWAP. So the risk point is always
VWAP. Obviously, price being closer to
VWAP or even overlapping VWAP is going to
be the ideal scenario. But it's just not
always, it's not always the case. It's not
always the reality of the situation. And
this is part of one of the challenges with
trading is kind of navigating that gray
area. Is, is this going to, in this
scenario, is price actually going to mark
that high right through here and do one of
these? And we're not going to get the real
test of VWAP. What do you do there? Well,
one thing you can do is as price starts to
approach VWAP and you're thinking that
it's getting close enough, this is also
going to depend on your experience level.
But as, as it's getting close, you think
it's close enough, you see a pretty strong
signal, but you still have some upside
risk. You just want to consider, all
right, if I actually put on a trade here,
am I comfortable with the risk point up
into VWAP? Or do I want to just put on
half size because I think this may be the
local high and price is actually going to
start coming back down. So you can go in
with half size to kind of mitigate some
risk just in case it does come back up
into VWAP. And then your game plan would
be to add your second half of your
position right through there. Or you just
enter full right through here and you just
keep your risk point where it should be up
at VWAP. So that, that, that is definitely
the most frequently asked question that I
get about the program. How close is too
close or how close is close enough rather.
And it's really just a function of risk,
right? So remember your risk point for the
two hour trader framework is going to be
VWAP. If you front run it, that does not,
you know, if we're following the framework
and you front run it and you put your stop
right here, you're not really following
the framework anymore. Because price can
very easily just kind of do one of those
and then actually respect VWAP and then
come back down. And now you took your
stop, you're no longer in a position. The
other, some of the other kind of less
frequently asked, but common scenarios,
common questions that I get about the
framework is. When we have scenarios like
this, where price, it tests VWAP and then
comes and retests. Now, this is not going
to be an ideal scenario, right? We don't
really love to see the retest there. We
want these situations where price gives an
immediate move away from VWAP that tells
us that our entry was well-timed. We're in
at the, at the right time. And, you know,
we can start to manage the trade
accordingly. Now, if you, if you find
yourself in a situation where you're short
through here, right? As long as price is
not yet breaking VWAP, the trade is still
valid and the trade is still on. So that,
that's going to be more situational
depending on big picture context and what
we're working with. The other thing to
remember about the two-hour trader
framework is that the purpose of the setup
is to help you position to participate in
some sort of trend move. So if you
identify very choppy conditions on any
index or any stock in play that you're
looking at and you're wanting to trade
VWAP, just remember the trade, the setup
does not work that well. In many cases, it
does not work at all if conditions are
very choppy. So if you just see range
bound conditions and price is just kind of
churning through VWAP, let's take a look
at a recent example here. So we're looking
at ES. This is just a sideways day. And
you'll see some isolated scenarios in here
where VWAP is actually respected. The
intent of the framework is not to position
you in this sort of action. Not at all. So
if you identify this sort of action early
in the session, the suggestion is to
consider different strategies or not trade
or just not trade for that day. Now,
again, you're going to find some isolated
scenarios where it kind of looks decent,
right? Maybe through there, maybe through
here. But caution is definitely warranted
when price action is much choppier. Now,
while we're actually looking at this setup
right through here, there are going to be
some scenarios with the two-hour trader
framework where you see kind of a blip
above VWAP, right? Remember a minute ago
we were talking about proximity to VWAP?
Blip above VWAP and then you start to get
that signal bar. Is that an acceptable
scenario? Absolutely. Absolutely. So long
as the signal bar and what you're looking
at for your entry is actually beneath
VWAP, if we're thinking about short and
not above VWAP, should be good to go.
Should be good to go. Target remains the
same. We're going for the prior session
low. So this is not the cleanest example,
but again, this is just a reality of how
price will unfold during certain times
near VWAP and how the market trades in
real life. We could talk about textbook
situations all day, but there are going to
be scenarios that are just not as clean.
Remember, as a trader, you have a choice
to not trade those scenarios that you
don't see as picture
perfect. So on that note, on the note of a
picture perfect trade, let's actually
review one right through here. We had this
was a 10R short opportunity in NQ
yesterday. And one of the ways to really
start to improve the two-hour trader
framework. Now, remember, let me back up a
second. On its own, standalone, the two
-hour trader framework does have positive
expectancy. It is going to provide you
with a solid edge in the market. If you
really want to sharpen that edge and you
really want to improve the framework, once
you start to kind of master the basics of
what it is that you're looking for within
this framework, what you can do is you can
start to incorporate levels of interest
and reference points. These are going to
add confluence to the actual setup. Now,
looking at this NQ trade from yesterday,
what we see is, number one, there's a lot
of overnight weakness, right? You have a
data print right through there. We have
some weakness off of the open and a pretty
tremendous bounce into VWAP. In addition
to VWAP right there, we have a level of
interest. So I love these scenarios
personally where you have a level of
interest that is overlapping or at the
very least pretty close to where VWAP is.
In these situations, if you can leverage
both a level of interest or a reference
point and VWAP, you're going to have a
much stronger trade opportunity. And you
definitely want to be looking at those
opportunities more closely. So again, we
have a level of interest right through
here. We have VWAP right through there as
well. We have a pretty strong signal bar.
This is the NQ one minute chart. So you
have kind of that bearish and goal thing.
It's a little bit of a shooting star look
right through there. Now, remember on this
trade, on any trade within the two hour
trader framework, the entry requires the
signal bar to close completely. And then
your entry is with confirmation of that
signal bar. And confirmation comes when
price actually trades through the high or
low of the signal bar. So if we're looking
for shorts, it's obviously going to be the
low of the signal bar. If we're looking
for longs, it's obviously going to be the
high of the signal bar. And in this
scenario, you have the low of the signal
bar perfectly aligned with that level of
interest. So it makes it really easy for
us as traders. We just put our limit sell
right through here, say 21099
.5, something like that, like a tick or
two below the 21100 level of interest. And
then as always, the stop goes right up
through here. And our target is way down
here into session lows, right? Now, price
technically never hits that target. Of
course, with a move like this, you know,
you want to be incorporating some sort of
trailing system, which kind of brings me
to my next point about the two hour trader
framework. There's going to be scenarios
where price does not get all the way to
the target, right? It gets close. Maybe it
even gets more than halfway. By the way,
remember that risk when we enter a trade,
if we make no changes to our risk
management approach. Let me clear this
drawing off and bring back a visual here.
There's another question I see about the
framework. So if we have this setup and
our risk point is right up here and our
entry is through here, we're looking at a,
you know, nearly a 10R trade, which means
for every unit of risk, we have 10X
reward. If we see prices now down here,
right? And we've not moved our stop from
right here. What does that do to the R
multiple? What does that do to the risk to
reward of the trade? Well, it makes it
more like this, right? Takes it from a 10R
trade to something that is now less than
2R. So our risk point is becoming larger
and larger. Then remember, as price gets
lower and lower, basically as it does what
you expect it to do, if you, again, if you
make no changes to your risk, you just
keep your risk point static, what happens
to your risk to reward? Now we're kind of
looking like this. So now our risk is
disproportionately larger than our reward.
So the important thing to remember with
not only this trade, but any trade that
you put on within any strategy, as price
moves, your risk profile changes. Risk is
not a static thing. We're dealing with
price that is moving. For every second,
there's new movement. So we get more
information and the risk profile changes.
So typically, my suggestion is, you know,
just as kind of a baseline rule of thumb,
if price is getting, you know, halfway or
more to your target on the two-hour trader
framework, it's typically a good call at
that time to start to move your stop from
a loss and bring it into profit. Right? So
we still can capture this additional
upside. In this case, it's downside, but
upside as far as the expected value of the
trade. And we're not at, we're not putting
ourselves in any risk, right? So if price
comes in, takes our trail, it takes us
out, we miss some additional upside, but
at least we're not going to be taking a
loss on this play. So that is my update on
the two-hour trader. If you guys have been
enjoying the material, let me know. If you
have questions, let me know. Feel free to
reach out. My DMs are always open. If
you're not in the Traders Think Tank, and
you're just purchasing the two-hour trader
framework, and you have questions within
the platform, you can still send me a
direct message. So you don't have to be a
Traders Think Tank member to send me a
message. Feel free to reach out with
questions, or as always, you can email me.
This is going to be posted as a recording
to the two-hour trader material. I'll see
you guys in the next one.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.