Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Previously on The Hack.
I'm friends with Claire Rue Castle -Brown, the journalist and sister -in
Gordon Brown. He's leaning in.
Mordoff's ambition is limitless, but he's overstepped here.
Part of a new operation.
Operation Wheating. We're investigating allegations of phone hacking. Contact of
mine in the fourth has been put on it. He's feeding me.
Well, that's a felony in lap, okay?
This could get you in serious trouble.
Hello? Dave, it's Mike at the Sun.
Give Panorama, Mike Sullivan, Nick Davis, anything about our cases and
strung up for all to see.
I was in the database.
News of the World, April 14th, 2002.
Millie Dowler. Jingle says there is a page on Dowler in Marquez notebooks.
The News of the World will not be forgiven for this.
I was being drawn to stories again and again with the same theme. A deep
urge to hit back at anybody at all who takes power and abuses it.
Our guest now joining us from the newsroom of The Guardian is Nick Davies,
-winning journalist who has brought phone hacking into the light. Hi.
Now, Nick Davies, could you have predicted the furore that the Millie
Dowler case seems to have caused?
Predicted, no, but I do think it speaks well for the British public, for the
world public, that a furore has been provoked.
You have Rupert Murdoch firmly on the ropes.
I have to say, I'm horrified that they closed the News of the World. Good
journalists have lost their jobs.
I believe this was a cynical move on Murdoch's part to help aid his capture
-Sky B.
And what do you think it is about the Millie Dowler case that has had such an
impact? Well, what we discovered was that during the period of her
disappearance, News of the World were using a private investigator to listen
her voicemails. So that in itself is horrid. Deeply personal stuff. Friends
family. still thought she may have run away and were imploring her to come
The voicemail filled up, which is why they deleted the messages.
Now, friends and family who had previously heard the message voicemail
surprised by this, and the presumption became that Millie was still alive.
I guess we all want to know whether Rupert Murdoch will feature in front of
Leveson inquiry, and why. Well, before Leveson, actually, Rupert Murdoch is due
to speak at the House of Commons Media Select Committee.
We want to get answers from him as to what he knew about phone hacking,
widespread practice in his newspaper, when he knew about it, and why he didn't
act.
Nick Davies, thank you for joining us.
Thank you for having me.
Whether Rupert bails on us, I don't know.
Well, you could compel him. The thing you need to ask is, can you truly compel
Murdoch to do anything?
Are we singing Happy Birthday? So, who's getting to ask the first question?
Well, I do, though. Nick is intent on writing it for me.
I think we should sing... No, Happy Birthday's a terrible song. Nick thinks
Happy Birthday's fascistic. It is culturally fascistic. Everyone has to
same song on their bloody birthday. Where's the individuality? Well, we
sing...
What's the one where we count the candles on the birthday cake? Have we
energy? Well, speak.
At least we deserve a speech. Yes, yes, on your face.
Uh, no.
But, okay, I would like to thank you all for coming, and I would like to remind
you we have work to do. The select committee is our chance, with Murdoch on
stand. And I won't let you down.
No, no, no, Tom, I'm not saying that. Maybe I should have let you retire.
You were going to retire?
Move to Belgium.
Ah! Chocolate. And then with Levinson making sure that we're fully prepared.
Nick, Nick. Today we celebrate. A prep session would have been much more
preferable to any kind of birthday.
Not only are the songs fascistic, but Nick thinks birthdays are narcissistic.
likes to work. True. How nice then that none of his friends came, just the
people he works with. Now you're treading a very fine line between
Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday dear Nick.
Happy birthday to you.
So, good news and bad news. Good news, it's all cooking nicely for the Select
Committee. The bad news, you are going to have to give evidence at Leveson. It
needs your heft.
Alan's house may have been compromised.
What? He hired someone to sweep his house for bugs. That person
it. The person who subcontracted it, too, worked for him as an associate of
Rhys.
How do you know? I can't tell you.
I know Rhys has been bragging about how he knows the bug sweeper.
You sure?
Ask Alan about the socks. He keeps some of the piano.
The socks.
Oh, Christ.
It's true.
I like him.
I'd get a better feel for the piano if I played barefoot. Alan, you do not have
good hiring practice. It seems possible to claim. You hired someone to debug
your house, and instead they may have compromised.
Are my children in danger?
Dave doesn't think so.
Don't know about you and me.
We've got Murdoch on the stand.
They know they're being hunted.
Call it Hannibal, most vicious Hannibal of all.
Fuck.
I thought the worst of it was over.
The day after Cameron announced the Leveson inquiry into phone hacking, the
Select Committee issued an order summoning Rupert Murdoch.
and his son, James, to attend Parliament on the 19th of July to basically
explain themselves.
The significance of this moment was not lost on any of us. If we asked the right
questions, we could ensnare them, both father and son.
OK, everyone, settle now, please.
We are now in session. Mr Watson will ask the first question.
Mr Murdoch Senior, Mr Murdoch Junior, good afternoon. Thanks for coming in
today. My first question is for Mr Murdoch Senior.
You have repeatedly stated that News Corp has zero tolerance to wrongdoing by
employees. Is that right?
Is that me?
Yes.
In October 2010, did you still believe it to be true when you made your
speech and you said, let me be clear, we will vigorously pursue the truth and we
will not tolerate wrongdoing?
Yes.
So if you were not lying then, somebody lied to you.
Who was it?
I don't know.
That is what the police are investigating and we are helping them
But you acknowledge that you were misled?
Clearly.
If I can take you to 2006, when Clive Goodman was
arrested and subsequently convicted of intercepting voicemails.
Were you made aware of that?
I think so. I was certainly made aware of when they were convicted.
And what did News International do subsequent to the arrest of Clive
Glenn Mulcair to get to the facts?
We worked with the police on further investigation and eventually we
very quickly appointed, a very leading firm of lawyers in the city to
investigate it further.
What did you personally do to investigate that?
After Mr Goodman went to prison, you were obviously concerned about it.
I spoke to Mr.
Hinton, who told me about it.
Okay.
In 2008, another two years, why did you not dismiss News of the World
chief reporter Neville Thirlbeck following the Mosley case?
I'd never heard of him.
So none of your...
UK staff drew your attention to this serious wrongdoing, even though the case
received widespread media attention?
I think my son can perhaps answer that in more detail. He was a lot closer to
it. I will come to your son in a minute.
Um, can I ask you, when did you first meet Mr Alex Maranchak?
Mr...? Alex Maranchak.
He worked for the company for 25 years.
I don't remember meeting him. I'm out of shaking hands walking through the
office, but I don't have any memory.
Mr Murdoch Senior, you seem to indicate that you had a rather hands -off
approach to your company.
Could you just give us an illustration of how often you would speak to the
editors of your newspapers?
For example, how often you would speak to the editor of The Sun or to the
of the News of the World?
Very seldom.
Sometimes I'd ring the editor of the News of the World on a Saturday night
say, have you got any news tonight?
But it was just to keep in touch.
Well, I'm intrigued as to how the conversations might go.
I imagine that to the editor of the News of the World, it might go along the
lines of anything to report.
And the editor of the News of the World says no.
No, it's been a standard week. We paid Gordon Taylor £600 ,000.
He never said that last sentence.
I mean, surely in your weekly conversation with the editor of the News
World, with something as big as that, paying someone a million pounds, paying
someone £700 ,000, I mean, surely you'd have expected the editor to just drop it
into the conversation at some point during your weekly chat.
No, I'd say, what's doing?
Sorry? I'd say, what's doing?
And what sort of response would you expect?
He might say we've got a great story exposing X or Y or he would say more
nothing special.
He might refer to the fact that however many extra pages were dedicated to the
football that week.
But he wouldn't tell you about a million pound pail?
I just want to say that I was brought up by a father who was not rich but who
was a great journalist.
And he, just before he died, bought a small paper specifically in his will
saying he was giving me the chance to do good.
Now, I remember what he did and what he was most proud of and for which he was
hated in this country by many people for many, many years, which was to expose
the scandal at Gallipoli, which I remain very, very proud of. I think that all
students of history will be...
Um, the sitting is suspended.
The defence told the court the father of one from Windsor had wanted to throw
his revulsion over the scandal at News International.
I couldn't get my hands on that phone.
He then cut it. He thinks, what, that his amateur dramatics are more useful
what we were doing in that room. Good questions were asked.
Yeah, they were, and they weren't answered.
And that obfuscation is important.
Oh, it was.
Awful senile act Murdoch was putting on. That needed writing about, but now
every paper will carry one thing and one thing only. Wendy Murdoch fighting for
her man.
You're worrying too much, Nick.
You don't understand news circles.
Yeah, but it's still Leveson. Yeah, nothing else but Leveson. There is no
but Leveson air. If Leveson doesn't produce... Then what?
You're going to hide under a tea towel for the rest of your life?
Look, Nick, a serious inquiry led by quite a clever bloke is happening
of your journalism.
It could mean regulation, ethics, maybe even an appropriate relationship between
press, politicians and police.
When did you become the positive one?
Oh, fuck off.
Lord Leveson's report's given us a new press and a new Dave Cook.
Fuck off.
Wait.
What's the latest with the select committee?
We're going to get James Murdoch back in. On what grounds?
Clarity on whether or not he was told about the Neville email.
Why are there police officers in our newsroom?
What?
They want to talk to Amelia.
Amelia? What about her?
They're sorting the official secrets out.
Yeah. Hi, where are you? On my way somewhere. I can't tell you where.
Amelia, this is Alan.
Alan, I'm just on my way to meet someone.
What's going on?
I think you should come in.
They're upstairs.
They're saying they won't leave until they've spoken to you.
No, no way. Not without a lawyer.
Agreed.
They don't like my biscuits and they don't like my small talk about Chopin.
They're saying they need your notebooks.
If you can't find your notebooks, they'll get a warrant and head to your
They're also saying that notebooks aren't in your flat. They could visit
mother. Tell them I'm not going to give up my tools or my notes.
I'd rather go to prison.
Right.
Good.
I'll contact some friends, give you some recommendations, or you can find a
lawyer for yourself, a human rights specialist.
This'll get leaked.
Right? I expect that.
But you might need to stay somewhere else tonight with your friends. Look
happens.
We were exposing them, not the other way around. It isn't what happens.
But it does seem to be what's happening.
I'm so sorry.
Hi.
Hi.
How are you?
I'm okay.
I'm calling about Levinson.
I'm going to apply to be a core participant.
The group packed off. I don't know if you've... Yeah, yeah.
Well, they saw the Channel 4 interview and they've been pretty insistent that I
say something.
Not that they're making me... They seem very good
people. They don't really have anyone to talk to about the Met from the inside
and I think that's why they want me.
Oh, and they have you and they have me.
You're doing it too?
I registered yesterday. I was going to email.
There are implications.
Sure. For the kids.
We'll have to speak to their school, their friends. We could be targets.
Why is it worth me doing it than you?
Because of Daniel Morgan.
Because the case collapsed.
They said you were feeding lines to a witness. You don't think they're going
use that against you if you give evidence? No, listen, listen.
Jackie, I just want this out there.
You do, OK?
Hi, Nick. Sue Akers. I hope I'm not disturbing you.
Deputy Assistant Commissioner.
This is quite... Call me Sue, please.
Quite the surprise, Sue.
I was hoping you might have a moment to make me a cup of tea.
Of course I do, yeah. Of course, come in. Sorry.
Through here. Thanks.
You've come to my house.
Not a short distance. On a Saturday, so... Whatever this is can't be good.
I mean, I have to assume... Can't be good at all.
Maybe take a seat.
Oh, God.
Nick, I'm afraid that part of the story you published about Milly Dowler is
inaccurate.
Inaccurate how?
It looks likely that the News of the World did not delete voice messages from
Milly Dowler's phone.
It's probable it was the phone company.
That's not... I have two separate sources.
The networks used automatically deleted messages after 72 hours.
That's how we presume they were wiped.
You're using words like presume.
Probable, likely.
And we believe those deletions happened prior to Glenn Mulcair being instructed
to get inside her phone.
Before Mulcair.
Nick, I came here in person to acknowledge all you've done.
Without you, weeding is impossible.
Without you... You can't know for certain who deleted what. I'm sorry.
We'll be releasing a statement to correct the record.
The article said messages were deleted by journalists in the first few days
after Millie's disappearance.
That's the only inaccuracy.
It's a large one.
I have a good source which tells me Surrey Police turned off the automatic
deletion system on the fourth day and some voicemail appeared to have been
deleted after.
Are they sure?
No. Sure?
They were inside the phone.
Yes. They may have subsequently deleted messages.
My source tells me they did.
I believe my source.
Then there is too much for them to lose in court.
Right. Well, let me issue a retraction and an apology.
We made a mistake. We may not have. We made a mistake, Snakeman. There we are.
Ten lashes for you, ten lashes for me. Two Acres agrees with most of our story.
They did hack the phone.
Surrey Police did know about it, surely.
I have two priorities.
That they don't use this to try and obfuscate the crime they have committed.
A dead girl's phone was hacked.
And my other priority is you.
What was that Carl Bernstein quote?
All great reporting is the same thing.
Best obtainable version of the truth.
I'm going to be absolutely monstered.
It serves them very well to try and destroy your reputation. I don't want to
apologize.
Then don't.
The paper has to. You don't.
Stand up, put on some iron underwear and fight.
The monstering was high energy.
Fuck you.
Doubt turned into certainty that we had got it wrong. Fuck you.
Richard Caseby, managing editor of The Sun, told the House of Lords committee
that Alan Rusperger had sexed up his investigation into phone hacking. Fuck
Rod Little in the Sunday Times said baldly the Guardian had made it up.
you.
But beneath all... Beneath all that exaggeration and hostility was
the fact that I had stated as a fact something which now appeared to be
I had damaged myself and I'd exposed the Guardian.
How are you enjoying it?
Yeah, it's quite a thing.
The outside of your house?
Whatever fuel they have, they're readying to throw on the fire.
So why are you so calm?
Oh, I'm an optimist slash pessimist. I presume I'm capable of great things, and
yet I assume the worst about that.
You always thought you'd be found out.
Well, my mother said it would be.
Maybe I should be an optimist slash pessimist.
I wouldn't recommend it. It does horrible things to your guts.
Are you really going to New York?
The police haven't charged me.
I'm free to go.
Well, you could just stay here. You'd be up to this stale toast in no time.
The Evening Standard tried to do a story about me sleeping with my source.
A few weeks later, they rang and said I was sleeping with an MP.
Wrong Amelia, and she's married to him. I just... I can't.
I don't want to be the story.
No.
No, I'm not sure I do either.
Luckily, they had a booking free for me on Newsnight tonight, and Jeremy
Paxman's a notoriously kind interviewer. You're going on Newsnight?
Against whoever.
News international thing will do me most damage.
But steel underpants filled with stale toast would be fine.
If I don't come back... I mean...
I want to say something.
When this is all done, and they tell the story of it, you know, when you look
back or write about it, don't paint me as your protégé.
I mean, I've been at this a long time.
I worked Jinkle across multiple cases for years.
I mean, it was your story, and Millie would have never happened without you.
But it wouldn't have happened without me either.
You don't need to say anything. Don't let them whitewash all the other people
out. You don't need to say any of this.
I actually do.
Here's my wallet.
Okay.
Email me when you get there.
If Paxman hasn't killed you first... I don't know my corpse.
Good luck, Nick.
Tonight, who knew what and when in the phone hacking scandal?
Could James Murdoch really have been unaware?
Why did the Guardian claim the news of the world deleted voice messages when
they had no evidence?
It was the Guardian newspaper's claim, stated as facts, that they'd been erased
by the news of the world, which triggered the shutdown of what was once
biggest selling paper in the English -speaking world.
I think, David, let's cut to the chase. What you claim to be a fact wasn't a
fact, was it?
The story we published in July was squarely based on the evidence
correct in saying that her voicemail was deleted. And it remains the case that
News International are not denying that News of the World journalists may have
been responsible for those deletions. Well, let's look at the front page here.
News of the World hacked Millie Dowler's phone during police hunt. And the paper
deleted missing schoolgirls' voicemails, giving family false hope.
He's saying the copy, the messages were deleted by journalists in the first few
days after Millie's disappearance.
Everybody who was involved in that story accepted it was true. It's a very
interesting thing that when that story was done... No, no, no. What, you're not
allowing me to answer? Well, no, I'm not, because you're not answering.
Well, you're not asking the right questions.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Everybody involved in that story accepted that... that story was true and
believed it to be true to accept until four months right four months later new
evidence which was not available to everybody surprised you did not report
like that showed that one element of that story is now in doubt. It has not
proved to be untrue. So you accept it wasn't true.
Jules Stenson was a featured editor of the News of the World. What do you say?
Well, the key point to this as well is that this wasn't any old story.
This was a story that was the most important story in the Guardian's
was vital that every single element of it should be right. And Nick Davis
repeated that allegation 34 times.
Let's get things in proportion here. Your newspaper had hacked a murdered
telephone. What we did was indefensible, not just... to Millie, but to all the
victims of hacking. I'm not here to justify that in any way. What I am here
do, though, is to attack the shoddy journalism of The Guardian and the
journalism of Nick. This is a classic example of the way tabloid newspapers
work. You're in a heap of trouble because for four years, you personally
taken Murdoch's money and ruined people's lives, invaded people's
engaged in criminal activity. You've hired private investigators in the past,
haven't you? Private investigators who have broken the law, haven't you, Jules?
I'm not here to justify... Haven't you, Jules? You accuse me of shoddy...
journalism, when your name is all over the records of Steve Whittemore, private
investigator who was convicted of using illegal means, your name's there.
Information about Jeremy Thixton, about Anne Robinson, about Anna Frewell. There
are public interest factors.
You know what, Jules? You should just stop. Take a leaf out of Rupert
book and get a bit humble, or else just go quiet.
People don't believe you anymore. Right. We're not going to be bullied by people
like you anymore. We've had enough of you.
Two years after this, Jules Stenson pled guilty to conspiracy to hack phones,
but...
Well, I wish I knew that at this moment
Detective Chief Superintendent Dave Cook.
David, what's this number?
Listen, Jackie, I, um... I need you to pick up my kids.
Where are you calling from?
It's, um... It's actually a police station number, Jackie. I'm being
What?
On what charge?
It's misconduct.
Data protection.
They raided the house.
Well, did they find anything?
Some old files.
What files?
Why did you have files at home?
I don't know.
What the fuck are they doing?
I don't know, Jackie.
I don't know.
What do we do?
How can we help them?
I'm not sure we're going to help until we know what they have.
Well, we have to do something.
We both know he was passing information to both of us. And they've arrested
Amelia's son.
Sit tight.
We'll find an answer.
Okay, bye.
I don't know what you think you have here. Would you like a cup of tea, sir?
I would like to leave.
I'm supposed to be given evidence tomorrow.
I'm a participant in Leviton.
But then I suppose you already know that.
This conversation is being recorded, so... Yes.
I understand that you've refused legal representation.
Yes. And I do need to check that you do fully understand your rights.
I'm 40 years in the police force, son. Yes, I understand my rights.
Good. All right, let's start from the beginning then, shall we?
Tell me about your relationship with the journalist Mike Sullivan.
No comment.
So you deny passing information to journalists?
And, as you know, police officers working for Operation Elveden. Operation
Elveden is about bribery. I have never accepted money from a journalist in my
life. It's an operation looking into the corrupt relations between police and
the press.
News International sent an email. News International sent an email. Do you deny
you were in regular contact with the journalist Mike Sullivan?
Mike Sullivan and I worked together.
It was John Yates who introduced us.
He had access to my investigation in return for writing helpful articles in
newspaper. I have done nothing that a million police officers before me
done. It is standard police practice.
You did nothing wrong.
Nothing.
Forty years in the police service and you didn't know you broke the law.
Shame on you.
They're trying to get a door.
They're waiting for any mistake.
Then let's try not to make any mistakes.
Come inside.
Lindsay found a spare duvet from somewhere.
I don't need to stay.
You should.
I'd like you to.
Doing a sleepover with the editor of the Guardian.
Not editor.
Friend.
This, um... This may not be entirely comfortable.
I should be helping.
Yes, you should.
A journalist running away to America. Two police officers under arrest.
You're so paranoid. You're having this house periodically debugged, and it's
your fault.
Yeah.
You remember when we first met?
I felt like a child who forgot his pencil.
You were so thrusting, and, well, I wasn't.
You were ambitious.
Hugely.
Compensating for who knows what.
And I thought, well, if everyone at the Guardian's like him, I'm done for.
Thankfully, they weren't. Thankfully, as it turns out, I had something to offer
you.
As you had something to offer me.
Nick.
Don't mistake the fact you were first through the door with the fact that
everyone else went through the same door willingly.
The sacrifices weren't for you. They were for your cause.
You're part of a team, Nick.
The funny thing is, you always have been.
I think he's going to get away with it.
No, Doc, I think he's going to get away with it.
Perhaps.
Perhaps that's what abusers do.
Get away with things.
Or perhaps not.
Not really. Maybe... Maybe... Deep down
inside them, there's just... Damage.
Yes, there's sometimes.
Yes, but sometimes the damage they cause, sometimes.
But you're not trying to excuse her, him.
No, Nick.
I'm not trying to excuse your mother or him.
I'm saying... all we can do is fight the
best we can and...
I hope we've proved to be a valiant opponent.
And personally speaking, I'm so proud to have been a part of
this great valiant act.
Whatever happens... know that.
You're welcome.
Don't worry, you're before me.
I'm just... insanely horrifically early.
It's Jackie, isn't it?
Yes.
I read her statement.
Strong stuff.
Harrowing. Punchy.
Neck, by the way.
I know, and thank you. Coming from you, that's some thank you.
May I...
I mean, I hope it's okay to ask.
How's David?
Oh, it's been a week since we spoke, but he's back in his house at least.
He won't take my calls.
He will when he's ready.
It won't be you. It'll be him.
It's generally him.
He helped, by the way. I'm not sure whether you're aware.
But he helped all of us. He was P.
We wouldn't be here without his help.
Sorry. You do it.
Make your prep, run your lines.
Oh, God.
I'm usually good with details, but for some reason today my mind keeps going
blank.
I didn't sleep much.
I didn't sleep much last night.
Not a wink.
Then I don't sleep. I'm not someone who sleeps.
You've always been like that.
Since I was a boy, yeah.
Dave did tell you I wasn't a simple guy to understand, right?
I've had days recently where I can't remember my own name.
I've been in rooms full of people and forgotten why I'm even there. I suffer.
I have done for years with panic attacks.
Every time I sat down to write this.
statement item.
But this morning I woke up and I felt clear, clearer than I have done in
That's good.
Yeah.
Just remember, in the storm of all of this, in all their mea culpa
of news of the world, they decided that in
the middle of this inquiry,
To launch the sun on Sunday.
That
thing you were
doing with the ball?
I don't mind.
It helps to calm you. Oh, God, what are you saying?
I've been tested by bigger things. Please.
Do what you need to do.
Yeah.
I'll be honest, I'm scared of this inquiry.
I'm scared because I think you'll take the wrong recommendations.
And because you'll destroy something.
which is precious, without rebuilding something better.
I don't want destroyed the notion of the unofficial source.
Sue Akers has arrested 37, 38 people in the four inquiries she's been running.
There have been a couple of arrests of police officers in cases where I know
quite a lot about the circumstances.
What's happened there is those officers have been told...
they will be charged with the common law offence of misconduct in a public
office.
Despite, to the best of my knowledge, there being no allegation of any kind of
bribe or inducement, what those officers are being told is you will be charged
and you can expect to get a prison term of up to 18 months because you've spoken
to a reporter without permission.
Now...
Two cases are live. We don't know how they'll turn out. It may well be that
Crown Prosecution Service will say, hang on a moment, this doesn't apply.
But I think it's worrying, and this is in the wake of the phone hacking.
I worry that it might be a completely unjustifiable and unnecessary backlash
the allegation of collusion between News International and the Met.
And the ultimate effect here may be to prevent... unauthorized contact between
journalists and police when as a matter of fact without this unauthorized
contact the metropolitan police would have been allowed to carry on misleading
press public in parliament about this whole scandal i'm also scared that this
inquiry might misstep in a different direction might soften itself
as its attack from outside sources
I have been under attack in one form or another ever since I first attempted to
reveal the practice of hacking. I represent here today a team of people,
all of whom have been under similar attacks.
In fact, the very extraordinary things to be part of this fight, they've done
so because what you're doing here today is precious.
News, I think, I think the best definition of it, news is what someone
doesn't want you to know.
The most difficult, skillful, interesting, important stuff that
about finding human sources and motivating them to help reveal that
tell you someone at the front line of that.
News is also often what someone is reluctant to tell.
So it's hard to motivate a human source to reveal their truth.
They'll say, look, if I talk to you and they realize I've done this, then I'll
lose my job or my career.
Or I'll be beaten up. I'll be arrested or embarrassed or ashamed. I will hurt
people who love me. It's a very sensitive moment.
You have to make those people safe.
You have to make those people realize
Their truth is worth the risk.
What these hackers did was about cutting out that human connection.
These so -called journalists didn't find the truth. They didn't persuade people
to come with them. They just stole.
They took.
And humanity was lost in that moment.
Not only in the privacy that was invaded, but also in the stories told
Our papers became dishrags of distorted content.
A set of rogue journalists working for a rogue corporation undermined the very
tenets of journalism.
The very tenets of truth -telling.
If this inquiry succeeds, we may be able to rebuild our newspapers.
We may be able to make them what they should be.
Fail, and News International will have trapped us all in their shadow.
And I'm scared that we will never get out.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.