Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
(intense fast music)
For over a century, the planet Mars
has been an enduring theme in science fiction.
From martian invaders, to human plans to transform
the Red Planet into a second home world.
Today, science fact is replacing science fiction.
And, to many people, it seems clear that
mankind's destiny as a spacefaring species,
lies here on Mars, rather than on the moon.
They're known as the Mars Direct Lobby.
Others disagree, concerned that such a step
may be a giant leap too far.
They are known as the Moon First Lobby.
Mars has been the planet that has captured
the imagination of science fiction writers,
and a lot of people in my business,
cut their teeth on science fiction.
So, they read science fiction, and they watched
science fiction movies and television as kids,
now they're adults, they're working in the business,
they always wanted to, and to them,
it's obvious you go to Mars.
Mars is the planet that's most Earth like,
of all the rocky planets, in the sense that it has
a reasonably equitable climate, it has evidence
for pass internal heat, it has evidence
for presence of water in a variety of states.
So, of all the planets, it is the one most likely
to have originated life.
And people want to know if that's true or not.
So that drive, that question, send a lot of
people off the deep end, of saying,
"Well, Mars is the obvious target, it's the next target.
"We've been to the moon, we've done that."
And I think that's looking at it the wrong way.
I don't deny that the origin of life is an important
scientific question, but there are a lot of
scientific questions, and that's one of many.
And the reason I have the (mumbles) is that if
you build my system, you can go everywhere.
See, I don't just want the moon, and I just don't want Mars,
and I just don't want asteroids, I want all of that.
And the way to get all of that, is to build a system
that's robust, that's incremental, that allows you
to gradually, but continuously, extend your reach.
I don't necessarily look at moon versus Mars.
I basically look at, you know, what's the
logical progression to get to Mars.
Can I use the lunar surface as a proving ground
before I go to Mars?
Now, the environments are obviously different.
Mars has an atmosphere, even if it's tenuous,
it's seasonal variations are different than the moon,
but there's enough things that you can do on the moon
that could help you get to Mars.
What's going on now is a lot of countries are
looking at Mars as being a bridge too far at the moment.
That's fine.
And, therefore, the moon makes a lot more sense.
It's relatively close, the United States has been
to the moon, so to a certain extent, it's not a been there,
done that, but it's we know we can do it again.
There are countries that are just literally
getting outside of Earth orbit for the first time.
So, going straight to Mars, really doesn't make
a lot of sense for those countries.
The people in China, and people in India,
and Japan, they want to see people on the Moon,
from their country, in their lifetimes.
They want to do it, they don't want to sit around
and talk about it, they want to do it.
So, I think that's why there's intense international
interest in the moon, it's a goal that's achievable,
it's a goal that has value, in terms of creating
space like capability, and it's something that
excites a lot of their supporting public.
So, they're very interested in the moon.
To many in the Moon First community,
the practical benefits of being able to test
a new generation of off world technologies,
are very appealing.
Not least because if anything goes wrong,
help is only days away, rather than months, or even years.
But that's not the only reason to return to the moon
The second thing, though, is the moon on its own
has tremendous resources, and a reason for
being there besides just science.
And so, whether it's the minerals, and the types
of different metals that may exist on the Moon,
whether it's water, those are things that society can use.
So, in 30 or 40 years, hopefully we've started
to not just go to the moon and look at the rocks,
and set up telescopes and things like that,
but we're actually trying to use it commercially.
And on the face of it, the commercial
value of the moon, could be literally out of this world.
Distilling rocket fuel out of moon rock,
could be extremely profitable.
As could mining platinum metals, and rare earths.
And the rare isotope helium three,
could turn out to be priceless.
It may be the most valuable substance known to human kind,
and unlike the Earth, the moon has millions of
tons of this stuff distributed across its smiling face.
The list of lunar goodies just keeps growing.
This has obvious commercial value.
And in fact, it will never be done as a government program,
it's always going to have to be,
there's going to have to be some commercial value,
and some group of investors and operators,
to make this thing work on a long term basis.
Now, my feeling is that the best way to induce
commercial activity on the moon, is to have
NASA lead and show that it's possible.
To show how difficult it is, and what it costs.
And then have the private sector
take that over and innovate.
In the last few years, over a dozen
companies have begun to make their
spacefaring intentions public.
Some are offering economical trips to low Earth orbit.
Others are offering innovative space habitat solutions.
Yet, others are promising to cash in on the
resources to be found on the moon, and on asteroids.
In each case, the plan is to hasten slowly.
To take small steps that can build upon the one before.
Remember, we didn't first land the Lunar Module on the
moon, we first landed a small little thing called Surveyor.
And we actually crashed a few things, called Ranger,
before that, so we started small, to show,
to learn how to do it, to show that it could be done,
and that's sort of the approach being taken
by the small companies like Moon Express, Nastrobotic,
and the Israelis, who are all competing
for the Google X prize.
And that's the first step, that's the way to, sort of,
let people get their feet wet, with the concepts
of designing space craft, delivering small payloads,
that's one way to develop a commercial industry,
is to seed it with a prize, and let people compete for it.
The Google Lunar X prize,
challenges privately funded space flight teams,
to land a robotic space craft on the moon,
travel 500 meters, and then send back high definition video,
and images of the terrain.
The winning team will net a cool 20 million.
But the bigger goal is to incentivize entrepreneurs,
to create a new era of affordable
access to the moon and beyond.
And to inspire the next generation of
scientists, engineers, and explorers.
Many observers believe that the next boot print
on the moon will be Chinese.
Closely followed by those from the host of other nations,
who dream of becoming spacefarers.
They, too, will proudly plant their national flags
in the moons unforgiving regolith.
Interestingly, some say symbolically,
when they get around to looking for the six
American flags planted by the Apollo astronauts,
they may be surprised by what they found.
Those flags have been on the moon now for almost 50 years.
And they've been exposed to the full fury of
14 days of lunar sunlight, where the sun is searing
their surface, and it gets up to...
The surface temperature is 100 Centigrade at noon.
And the numbing cold of lunar night,
which follows 14 days later, and it gets down to -150 C.
And if you look at any flag that's been out on Earth
for a long period of time, you'll notice
that the colors are faded.
I suspect that the flags on the moon are largely white,
because they've been bleached by
solar ultraviolet for 50 years.
In a way, that's kind of symbolic.
We got six flags planted by Americans on the moon,
all of them are now white.
That symbolism reflects the essence
of the United Nations outer space treaty,
which clearly states that the exploration
and use of outer space, including the moon,
is the province of all mankind.
Time will tell whether that treaty will hold,
as a new era in space exploration and development dawns.
But what is certain, is that our moon,
and our solar system, are about to be changed forever.
(dramatic music)
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.