Original subtitles

break and it's going to be a good one as always.

All right, you guys.

Happy Thursday.

Last show until I take a much needed

break and it's going to be a good one.

As always, as we continue this

investigation, we are definitively getting closer.

So what do we recall?

Well, we were told that Charlie just had

healthy bones, that it was a miracle that

the gun did not take his neck out

and that his spine somehow stopped it.

I can now officially debunk that

Marvel storyline and therefore we focus our

investigation on what actually happened

on 910 because I have new information and

I'm presenting it to the public today.

Plus later on the show, Josh Hammer has emerged.

You know, he's the one that thinks that

all white men, all white European men are

anti-Semitic.

Well, he is now releasing text messages

between him and Charlie that literally

prove absolutely nothing other than that

Josh Hammer is a dummy and didn't realize

that the text messages make his

storyline somehow even less credulous.

Good news is that he at least didn't plug his book.

Welcome back to Candace.

All right, you guys, where to begin?

Obviously we have a lot to unpack before I go on vacation.

I'm looking forward to reading.

I'm also looking forward to processing a

lot of the information that is coming to

me and researching more.

The place that we should start on today's

show is with, well, I first and foremost

have to tell you right at the top.

I can't tell you exactly who the

information came from or which parties were

involved in getting me this information

because I don't want to get anybody in

trouble.

But I can say that I have positively

verified something about the injury that

Charlie sustained to his neck that I

think is going to go a very long way in

terms of helping those of us who have

been sleuthing, those of us who want

answers, those of us who are

dedicating our time to this because what we are

being told by the authorities beggars

belief, as John and Arena Mappin said, it

just simply beggars belief.

We also want to make sure that we are

presenting evidence and debunking one

another where we can so that all of us

can collectively zero in and build upon

whatever facts we have in this decentralized investigation.

This is about the injury.

Okay.

So Andrew Colvett was, I can tell you,

telling the truth in part when he wrote

that very long tweet in which he tried

to explain why there was no exit wound.

Do you recall this?

A long story short, he said, I'm going to read it.

I want to address some of the things that

the lack of an exit wound, uh, about the

lack of an exit wound with Charlie.

I'm usually not interested in delving

into most of this kind of online chatter.

And I apologize that this is somewhat

graphic, but in this case, the fact that

there wasn't an exit wound is probably

another miracle and I want people to know.

I just spoke with the surgeon who

worked on Charlie in the hospital.

He said the bullet absolutely should

have gone through, which is very normal

for a high powered high velocity round.

I've seen wounds from this caliber

many times and they always just go through

everything.

This would have taken a moose or two down

an elk, et cetera, but didn't go through.

Charlie's body stopped it.

I mentioned to his doctor that there

were dozens of staff, students and special

guests standing directly behind

Charlie on the other side of the tent.

And he replied, it was an absolute

miracle that someone else didn't get killed.

His bone was so healthy and the density

was so, so impressive that he's like the

man of steel, it should have just gone through and through.

It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.

In the end, the coroner did find

the bullet just beneath the skin.

Even in death, Charlie managed to

save the lives of those around him.

Remarkable.

Miraculous.

Now keep that up for just a

second because it's really around here.

His bone was so healthy and the density

was so, so impressive that he's like the

man of steel that we just went, "Mm, something's not right."

Something's not right.

A lot of stuff's not right.

I just don't know why a surgeon would be

saying something that actually only the

medical examiner, somebody that

specializes in forensics could really contribute.

Yes, a surgeon can tell you, or actually

any person with common sense can tell you

that your bone density is better when you're younger.

But this seemed a little bit too performative.

Now I can tell you, the part that he is

telling the truth about is that Charlie's

neck indeed did stop the bullet without question.

Okay.

And this is going to dispel a

lot of theories that are out there.

And I'm telling you this 100%,

Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and the

bullet did not exit and at least a

fragment of the bullet was recovered from

his neck and I'm going to tell you

exactly where it was recovered from.

I have fact checked this information from multiple sources now.

I've actually been sitting on

this for a little bit over a week.

Right around here.

So think about almost in line with

your shoulder blade right in the center.

Now, why is that helpful?

Because it gives us a bullet trajectory.

Okay.

We went in here where you saw that and it

was stopped and a fragment was pulled from

think right, if you're just touching

your spine in line with your shoulder blade.

That leads us obviously to the part that

he's maybe not being forthcoming about.

They did not recover a bullet from a 30-06.

They didn't recover a bullet from a 30-06.

This didn't happen.

Okay.

They found a 30-06 bullets.

Charlie's death certificate certainly

would have reflected that in suicide in

suicide situations as just one example,

medical examiners feel free to chime in.

I've spoken to quite a few, but when

the gun and the bullet are known, they are

reflected onto the death certificate.

Okay.

There is not one reflected onto Charlie

Kirk's death certificate because they did

not recover a bullet from a 30-06.

Hunters and military men rejoice.

It turns out that common sense still rules the roost.

Okay.

You guys were right.

You were absolutely right.

And this is why I hate politics because

it requires us to submit to the idea that

we were all somehow born yesterday.

That it really can just, life really can

just be a Marvel comic with people that

are, I guess, a DC comic where there

are men of steel that are able because

they're young to stop 3,000 pounds

of energy that is coming at them.

That didn't happen.

So where does that leave us guys?

Well, the part that is now

extraordinarily suspicious is that Andrew was claiming

that he had a conversation with the

surgeon who offered up the idea that it

really was just your modern Christian miracle.

Charlie was just young and his bones had

a lot of density, which made him stronger

somehow than a Cape buffalo, enough

pushups and asparagus, and you too can

stop 3,000 pounds of energy coming at you.

What are we to make of that?

What are we to make of the fact

that Charlie did not do that actually?

It means that he was shot with a

completely different kind of gun, obviously.

The kind where this would make

sense, that it didn't cut through him.

The kind where it would make sense that

outside of an artery effectively exploding

from the front, his neck didn't

explode, which that particular weapon that they

were trying to tell us Charlie was killed

with would have gone through about seven

necks.

You will recall that throughout all

of this, or during this mayhem, rather,

there were people who were insisting,

by the way, they were on the ground, the

witnesses that were insisting that they heard multiple shots.

It's another element of this.

But those individuals were not the ones

that were awarded with mainstream media

interviews.

In fact, one guy in this kind of

went viral at the time even got pushed,

physically pushed, and was not

given the ability to speak at all.

They shut him up.

It looked, if we were just

examining the situation, it certainly

looked like turning point employees or

staff or students thugged to him so that

he wouldn't say what he thought happened.

Let's take a listen to that clip that has gone viral.

I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom.

I saw him.

I heard the shot ring out.

I looked to my left and then I looked over to my right.

I saw him slump over in his chair forward.

He slumped over.

He had blood coming from the left side of

his neck down his shirt and he slumped over

and he was carried off.

Get off me.

Get off me.

Emotions are running high right now.

Certainly emotions were running high.

He was just trying to speak and to say what he saw.

And interestingly, though, if you think

through what he said there, he said I was

in the third row.

Right.

And a shot rang out and I looked

to my left and I looked to my right.

Now, we're not specific on where exactly he was standing.

But if a shot, a high powered rifle came

from 250 yards behind you, you'd probably

look back first, right?

Like common sense.

If you heard the sound coming from

behind you, you would look back probably even

before your brain came online.

Your instinct would be to duck into, into

make sure that you're not going to get hit

by something.

That's coming from behind you now to

clarify immediately here and to again, debunk

some other internet conspiracy theories.

That is not Andrew Colvet in that video.

A lot of people were like, is this Andrew

Colvet from Turning Point USA hiding under a

hat?

It is not true.

I spoke to Andrew on this actual day.

He definitively flew in to Utah after the shooting took place.

He's not therefore on the ground.

But the person that is in that video, as

soon as I just put up a picture and I said

I'd like to identify this person, his

friend first left a nasty comment like, why are

you trying to look out for this guy?

He did the right thing.

How dare we ask questions?

How dare we try to get testimony from

anybody else that day kind of then messages me

privately because I reached out and I'm

like, I'm just trying to confirm the story.

And I reached out and he says, he says

to me, well, and I'm paraphrasing here, he

doesn't want to speak to you.

He doesn't want to speak to media because

he's been instructed not to speak to media

because he's gotten the Turning Point

chapter into trouble before for speaking out in the

media.

And he just doesn't want to do that.

And I said, that seems very strange to me.

What are you what are you saying to me?

You have a TP USA person who can't speak out about things.

There were tons of people that

were talking about their testimonies.

It's very odd.

In the immediate aftermath of the shooting,

you're telling me that Turning Point USA what

sent around a text and said, nobody speak to the media.

That's what that was an excuse, by

the way, for why he shut that guy up.

People were saying, oh, you know,

they're not allowed to speak to the media.

So they were just doing what they were told.

Well, then it's kind of interesting.

You should know that I then determined

that the person doing the shoving is first and

foremost, not a Turning Point USA employee.

He is first.

He is beyond that, not a student at UVU.

He is not a Turning Point USA student, therefore, either.

He was actually brought in as a

volunteer, which I found to be quite strange.

Like, look, I've done a lot of campus

stops and typically it's the chapter of that

school that does everything.

It's the chapter that handles everything.

Now, bigger events, they certainly work with other

organizations and it's possible.

I guess it registered to me as odd that a

volunteer would have the courage to shut

down a kid that's speaking in

that way, in that aggressive manner.

I would imagine Turning Point would tell

their volunteers not to get physical with

students on campus.

But what do I know?

I just have common sense.

Now, how do I know that he is not a

Turning Point USA employee and he is not a UVU or

Turning Point USA student?

Well, because despite him stopping a college

kid from speaking about what he heard, that

young man, whose name is Cooper, and I'm very comfortable

telling you this because, well,

he went on Fox News that very night to provide eyewitness

testimony to exactly what he heard

and what he saw, because apparently he was

the person that was holding the mic when the

shot rang out.

Take a listen to what he told Jesse Waters on the night of.

Cooper Brown was an event volunteer who was

just feet away from Charlie when he got shot.

Cooper, what happened?

Yeah, so this requires a little bit of background knowledge.

But so I work for an organization called Leadership Institute.

And what we do is we work hand in hand with

all the different conservative coalition groups

on college campuses.

So the Young Americans for Liberty, the

Students for Life and the Turning Point USA's.

And so at Utah Valley, we had been really,

really excited to be able to host Charlie Kirk

this semester.

And we had spent weeks and weeks and weeks

getting volunteers advertising for this event

and just so excited to be able to

host Charlie Kirk at this university.

And then unfortunately, it had to end in absolute tragedy.

So I'm trying to get in touch with this individual once I

realized that not only did he speak

the night of, he also spoke on Fox News

the very next day, which would mean what did

Turning Point USA?

I don't know the answer to this.

I'm asking genuinely, did they say speak

to this person who's not actually a TP USA

students, but he was there.

I don't know how this works.

But the next day, sure enough, he appeared on Fox News again.

And I'm not sure if we had that clip,

Skyler, but if we do, let's roll it.

That day, we had 30 or so student volunteers that were

designated roles that were going

to be helping pass out Turning Point USA

merchandise and getting people signed up for

the event.

And my responsibility was when the event

actually started to help manage just the

microphone.

So something simple as just raising it and

lowering it, making sure students were able to

speak into it clearly.

And I thought this was a fantastic

opportunity to be up really, really close to be able to

witness all the amazing dialogue that

what it's going to be happening on campus.

A couple of things about Cooper Brown that

to me is a bit of a mystery at this moment.

First and foremost, you provide witness testimony.

You start doing the rounds on Fox News.

You are fair game.

OK, I'm going to start asking questions.

I need to know everything.

Everything's got to fit neatly into my timeline.

So in trying to reach out to him and in

publicly posting, hey, I'm trying to identify this

individual, I received a ton of emails.

One email said, hey, I'm actually

his cousin and here is his number.

Now, I noticed that that cousin

happens to live in Phoenix, Arizona.

So I went and just checked some profiles on social media.

I found some Browns, but they

were all living in Phoenix, Arizona.

OK, maybe this person's from Phoenix, Arizona.

Well, actually, when I went through what he

has as his resume on this website where he

says that he works with this institute,

I could in fact check any of the things.

Went to school, a minor, a very small college in New Hampshire.

I'm from the Northeast.

If you're going to school in New

Hampshire, especially not the University of New

Hampshire, you can go ahead and

bet that you're going to be a local.

So I'm looking for a kid that's from

New Hampshire to go to this tiny school.

I found someone from that name with his

name, but it was actually a girl that had that

name and graduated in the year of he says he graduated in.

He doesn't look to me like he just graduated college.

But according to his resume, he did.

And the number that she gives me, which is

the first thing that registers to me as odd,

is a Utah.

I mean, I mean, sorry, it's a it's a Phoenix based number.

So I'm going, who is this person and why

is it linking that number to somebody else

who is 32 years old and has that same last name?

I don't know.

I intend to get those answers.

But there's something here that strikes me

as a little bit odd, especially given the

fact that as a volunteer, as he expresses

there, they decided to allow him to hold the

microphone. That's supposed to be

like kind of an honor at Utah events.

Turning Point USA kids work really hard to put these events on.

They decide is going to hold the microphone.

They went with a volunteer.

I don't know, but I'm going to find out.

OK, I don't know.

I'm going to find out.

So if you went to the Southern New

Hampshire University with this Cooper Brown and you

majored with him in politics and you can

provide some insight, I'd like to hear from

you. I am again asking these questions

publicly because we are getting no answers from

Turning Point USA or the feds or

anything that makes any practical sense in this

scenario. Why was everything so brand new on this day?

Now, for those of you that are still

caught up in what I just told you, which is that

for a fact, Charlie was shot from the front.

So we know the bullets directory.

There's no there's no games here.

There's no magic bullets.

It's a smaller weapon.

OK, your ears didn't betray you.

My ears didn't betray me.

We definitely did hear a very

recognizable sound of a rifle shot.

But I'm telling you that Charlie wasn't hit with that rifle.

And there is not a medical examiner's report or a death

certificate, which will stipulate

otherwise. It doesn't exist.

So what exactly are the feds building

their case on vibes or sheer corruption?

Because I'm thinking it might be the latter.

And who would be the person that can make that fit?

Look, I did receive a tip.

And guess what?

There was another person in this never

ending brand new cast of characters that was also

involved in this story.

And this person in an email insisted to me that this is

somebody that we should look further

into. That's the medical examiner.

It is a woman named Dr.

Deidre Weiss Amaro.

Deidre Weiss Amaro is her name and she blew in from California.

She was announced as the new

state medical examiner in May of 2024.

I'm sorry, from Missouri.

I think she also worked at some point in

California and she was announced as the new Utah

medical examiner, state Utah medical examiner in May of 2024.

So I'm interested in learning as much

as I can about this medical examiner.

I'd like to know more about this medical examiner.

And if you've got something you know, or personally got a

story, please do send it to us at

more tips at Candace Owens dot com.

Now it is possible given what we know about fed

type operations and what we know about the JFK

shooting, which we are still not allowed to know the truth

about, but we all know what the truth

is, that there are often decoys, even decoy sounds, that it is

totally plausible that there were

multiple people there that day who found out maybe even in the

final hour, which last hour, which one

of them is going to take the shot.

Right.

It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a

smaller gun, which maybe actually kind

of had to, if we're considering the trajectory that I'm telling

you here to here, kind of had to

come from the front of Charlie.

And I will say that that is now my well informed opinion, well

informed opinion, that we are looking

for a person that was a lot closer

to Charlie and likely in the audience.

And that goes a long way, by the way, in terms of trying to

explain why they're maybe hiding the

footage from behind Charlie's head.

Maybe that is the reason that that footage was so crucial.

First and foremost, another tons of

other cameras, that one gets grabbed first.

It seems to me that there's a lot of hiding and there's

definitively a lot of lying that's going on.

I told you Tyler Boyer lied.

He just lied.

The person who took the cameras down was absolutely not

instructed to do so by law enforcement.

Just wasn't.

Okay.

So why say that?

Also, why grab the one behind his head first?

All the cameras, why that one first and foremost?

And when I actually think about the clip

that I was shown, it was more to the right.

I actually feel that there is this remarkable blind spot on the

left of Charlie, which is why I was

asking if anybody had footage, not footage if you're sitting

there and taking footage this way.

But if you are Charlie, I want to see what he

would have seen looking slightly to his left.

By the way, despite the fact that we had

this amazing cast of characters, all these

caldera engineering, engineering connected people who made it

to the mainstream media to talk about

what they heard, there was actually one eyewitness there who

could not be shoved out of the way and

was able to make his way onto Fox News immediately after to

provide a description of where he believed

the shot came from.

And that's Jason Chavitz, right?

Jason Chavitz is a foreign politician and a Fox News

contributor who was a witness to this event

because he is from Utah.

He attended this event.

He apparently was in

communication with Charlie ahead of the event.

And I have to say that of everyone that day,

he's maybe the one of the few people that I would

say on the mainstream media that

seemed genuinely shaken by the event.

He went live, was speaking through what he

saw, what he heard, what he was expecting.

And he was rebutting because he was on a couple of shows,

rebutting the idea that the shot was

from far away.

That's very interesting to consider.

You've got a bunch of kids who are

trying to speak and they're getting censored.

And you have a bunch of people that are

giving a platform and they seem weird, right?

Tiffany Barker on Good Morning America.

Vibes were weird there.

OK, not assigning any necessarily

badness to her, but didn't feel right.

Jason Chavitz, however, genuinely, when I looked at the

footage, he seemed shaken by the

event. And let's hear where Jason

Chavitz says he believes the shot came from.

Take a listen.

Being there, seeing it within

proximity, it seemed like it was a close shot.

The venue is such that there's a four story

building, which is the administrative building to

the south. The other buildings around the side

are not quite so high, but you could be on the

second level and watch Charlie.

The police had moved the people.

There were some people that were above Charlie.

So that awning that you're seeing

there, there's a place to be there.

But the police moved people out to the sides.

And so you couldn't be right above where you were at.

But if I had to guess, and again, it's still raw.

But if I had to guess and give a police statement right here,

right now, today, see where that

water is, it looked to me like it was in great

close proximity straight ahead, right in that

area. If I had to guess again.

Quite interesting.

And then elsewhere, when he's on Fox News and

people are saying the shot was from like the

Lozy building, he doesn't believe that.

He doesn't believe that.

By the way, Jason Chavitz, he's

been honest about his background.

His parents are in the government.

They're literally in the FBI.

So he's telling you that shot was closer.

So what gives?

Also, why is everybody telling lies?

I want to be very clear, it's possible that

people at Turning Point are simply terrified.

That's definitely a possibility here.

They are very much aware of what these people are capable of.

And maybe they're just trying to get by and

they're being told what to say and what to do.

And they want to keep the peace.

But here's what I think may have happened.

I think that accidentally, I

accidentally ruined the fed narrative.

I think the plan was to never allow the back

footage of Charlie to see the light of day.

Never was allowed to see the light of day.

That way, they were going to say that

they recovered a 30-06 bullet, right?

Instantly, we recovered a 30-06 bullet.

They were maybe when they were digging

stuff up and there it was and it went through.

We wouldn't have known, we would

have been none the wiser, right?

No one else is telling us anything or showing us anything.

And I think they were going to say, or the other option, like

it completely took his neck out.

We wouldn't have been any wiser.

But then I watched it and the thing that

jumped out at me was that not only did the

bullet not pierce through, that there

wasn't a single dot of blood on Charlie's

bleach white shirt until he falls

out of frame and onto the ground.

I think we accidentally ruined what

they were going to try to do to frame this.

I think they wanted this to be a 30-06 narrative.

And now they're going to have a lot of

difficulty getting that through a courtroom.

They panicked, they tried to explain it away.

They're saying that it's a miracle.

I don't think it is.

It obviously was not a miracle.

I think it is likely that what we

should be looking for are two people that had

weapons that day, somebody that was in the

audience, somebody that was elsewhere with

a rifle.

That explains also why, by the way, when

I take a look, there are so many adults.

There's no UVU kids that were in the mainstream media.

Cooper's not even a UVU kid.

He's not a TPUS kid.

Why were they not able to find UVU students

to say what it is that they heard and what

they saw that day?

And what's really interesting is I told you

guys already about Nick who has been assisting

me on the ground.

And one of the first things he said to me

was that I felt like they were coming around,

the feds were coming around, and they were

trying to implant memories into our heads.

So he was like, I felt like there were

these people walking around that we didn't

recognize.

And they were like, you heard one shot.

You heard we heard one shot.

We heard one shot.

And he's like, I know that sounds weird and

conspiratorial, but it seems like they were

trying to make us believe that this is what we heard.

And it's interesting also because remember,

Phil, when Phil Lyman gave us his footage and

he walks outside of that building, the two

now infamous goth girls were not goth at all.

And they're just wearing black.

They say that they heard two shots.

They never made it to Fox News.

They never made it to the mainstream media.

But they too also said that they heard two shots.

Take a listen.

What can I say, guys?

I think it's pretty obvious that our

instincts about this have been correct from the very

beginning.

We probably need to be now looking for a

shooter that was in the audience and to the

left.

I've seen you guys.

I saw some guy, Alex Jones, I created like

he created a whole web and explained and did

this all on a computer of what

where the trajectory would have to go.

We need you again.

Ballistic YouTubers, gun people, gun

enthusiasts, military men, the people that they're

discounting and saying you have no right to get clicks.

No, please get clicks.

Explain to us what it is that you know in

this decentralized, intelligent agency, given

the information that I am telling you, OK,

that it had it unless we have a bullet that's

doing the worm like a WWE wrestler.

OK, bullets fire straight.

And this one went straight into the front

left lower side of his neck, essentially exploded

his artery and did not exit out of the back.

But that is where a bullet fragment was found.

So map it out for us.

There's something else that I would like

to point to that is getting interesting.

And that is regarding caldera engineering, caldera engineering.

Now, I said from the very

beginning that this company was shady.

It flagged me as weird.

All I was trying to do at that point was

not looking to caldera engineering, but rather

to track down the footage.

Irwin Steel, this steel, so many steels were involved.

It turns out the steels are big with caldera

engineering and things aren't adding up with

this company.

OK, it's just not adding up with this company.

And I can tell you I was receiving

information from people who work with valves who have

been in the industry for 30 years that live nearby.

And I have never heard of caldera engineering.

That's not normal.

I've never heard of them.

I've never worked with them.

I've never received any of their valves.

Something's not right here.

Right. I knew something wasn't right, but you can't just always go off

of just we know something's not

right.

We have to figure out what

exactly it is that is incorrect here.

Then I also decided to prod the narrative further.

Another person gave us a tip and said, hey,

did you know that there's literally someone who

works at caldera engineering who is a professional actor?

Like no background engineering went to school for theater,

worked in theater, was in plays, was

involved in plays.

I looked through everything, went through it.

I'm like, this doesn't make sense.

Why is he suddenly at caldera engineering?

Like not later in life, just like

randomly on his resume is caldera engineering.

Why are they hiring gay actors?

I don't know.

I don't know the answer to that.

I'm telling you guys what are the

things that I have stumbled upon.

Then somebody emailed us and this was strange.

We have not been able to corroborate this.

We can tell you the link was real and that

the but we don't know if the internet was

scraping and got things incorrect, but there was an Israeli

individual who was listed as the

founder of caldera engineering.

We obviously know that caldera engineering

had said that they did projects going with their

website in Israel.

I don't know what projects they worked on.

We weren't able to corroborate currently

that that individual is still working with the

company.

We don't know if this was accidental.

Sometimes the internet can do some funny

things and scrape and put information where it

doesn't belong.

This particular individual has a very

long background in engineering in Israel.

Maybe it's because they work together and

that's the internet thought that this person

was the founder and the individual

was not, but it's picking our interest.

Now we are confused, I would say at best about this company

because we wanted to go back and

just determine who the founders were.

Well, just our bad luck company was established in 1997.

So you won't be able to get those formation LLC docs.

You can find LLC docs in general, but they didn't start

digitizing those until the early

2000s.

So you're not going to get anything where you're going to be

able to see the actual formation

docs.

You can see changes they made in the early 2000s.

You can see who the manager or the president, all that stuff we

found, but I would love to find

those base formation docs.

And in order to get them, you have to go in person somewhere.

And I am certain I'm not going to

be able to get my hands on that.

Something else that was really interesting as I was looking

into caldera engineering was that

they opted to, in their very early years

of their company, use a lawyer for trademark

purposes down in Arizona.

And I'm looking at these early

documents and I'm like, wait a second.

I know this lawyer.

This lawyer was introduced to me

by Tyler Boyer, a turning point USA.

I have worked with this lawyer.

I paid this lawyer.

This is crazy.

So what is the pipeline between Utah and Phoenix?

I don't know.

You can use a lawyer anywhere, but usually when you're

formulating your company, maybe it was a

friend.

I don't know.

But I now have a ton of questions about caldera engineering.

So if you have any information or you're able to find anything

about them, or maybe you are an

engineer and you're like, I've been buying their valves

actually for 20 years, actually.

And they're fantastic.

They work great.

I'd like to hear from you again.

More tips at Candace Owens dot com.

All right, you guys, I'm going to throw it to some sponsors.

First and foremost, pre-born.

You guys know I love them because I have watched too many

people who I'm close to be vilified

for standing up for truth.

And many people have felt this thing of injustice for that.

But I've also realized that people are feeling encouraged and

are done with plain defense, not

watering down what we believe needs to be watered down in order

for it to be palatable because silence

isn't kindness.

Of course, it's consent.

And right now, the greatest silence is around the lives being

ended before they even take their

first breath.