Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Let's move on to the second trading principle, the continuation principle.
We will apply this principle in markets that are one -sidedly unbalanced.
In these environments, most participants at the aggregate level disagree on
their valuations of the price of the asset, and their actions cause the
to initiate an imbalance in search of a new zone of acceptability where price
and value converge and participants return to trading.
What the continuation principle tells us is that if price attempts to enter the
value area and fails to do so, by being rejected at the VA end or elsewhere, it
will most likely initiate an imbalance in favor of that direction.
One point to bear in mind is that price can come from outside the value area or
from inside.
The trading logic would be exactly the same.
Trading with the continuation principle will therefore be to wait for the price
to approach the extremes of the value area, and generate a sufficient reaction
to them to create a trend movement that moves the market away from the value
area.
This is the post breakout test trade.
The price leaves the value area and creates acceptance.
This acceptance sets the most likely direction to be in favor of the previous
breakout. In other words, if the price is above a value area or is coming out
a breakout profile from above, the main scenario would be to wait for a test of
that value area high in order to look for the continuation of the uptrend.
On the other hand, if the price is below a value area or comes from a break of a
profile from the bottom, the main scenario would be to wait for a test of
value area low in order to look for the continuation of the bearish movement.
Here is the first example.
As we can see, the market opens within the value zone of the previous session,
so at this point the context is one of equilibrium and therefore the trade to
apply would be the range trading principle.
The market generates two bullish reactions at the bottom of the value
examples of the application of the range principle.
But from there, a context of imbalance is generated that manages to break the
value area of its upper part.
At this point, the market context changes, and so should the trade to be
applied.
Knowing at this point that the directional bias is now bullish, we will
the trading level above which we will wait for the price to confirm the buy
opportunity.
This level is none other than the value area high of the broken profile.
The key question is how do we know that the imbalance has been accepted?
In this example, how do we know that the bullish breakout is effective and not a
false breakout?
From a volume profile analysis point of view, we will simply be left with the
definitive fingerprint that the price does not have the ability to re -enter
value area.
This is ultimately the signal that alerts us that such a price breakout has
failed, and therefore the market context has changed again.
Anything short of an effective re -entry into value area is a signal that we
need to watch for in order to continue to favor the continuation of the
imbalance movement.
And by effectively re -entering, I mean developing some price action back into
the value area so that there is evidence of acceptance to trade at these price
levels. What happens in this example is that the market generates a strong
reaction at the value area high of the profile, and that is where we would get
our signal to enter the market.
Here are two more charts of the beginning of a bullish continuation.
In the example on the left, the opening is above the value area high of the
previous session's profile.
So the first interpretation we have to make is that there has been an imbalance
to the upside, where buyers have had enough capacity to move the price away
its last value.
With this basic reasoning, where the market seems to indicate that the buyers
are in control, The first scenario approach would be to wait for some kind
test before continuing the development in favor of the imbalance, in this case
to the upside.
The price is approaching the value area, leaving two clear reactions on the
value area high.
These would be our signals to go long.
In the example on the right, the initial context is different as the opening
takes place within the previous day's value area.
The initial scenario, which we already know, would be to wait for the reaction
on the extremes of the value area, which favors the application of the range
principle. But what happened is that it quickly positions itself effectively
above this value area, changing the context and thus activating the scenario
the application of the continuation principle.
After several reactions on the high of the value area that prevent the re
into the range, the continuation of the bullish imbalance takes place, moving
away from the range.
In this last example, analyzing the principle of continuation on session
profiles, we have an example of a bearish continuation.
The market opens below the value area of the previous session, so the main
scenario would be to look for the acceptance of the bearish imbalance at
value area low of the profile.
And indeed, the market rejects the possibility of re -entering the range
generates a reaction that initiates the continuation of the bearish imbalance.
In terms of longer -term trading, where we analyze more price action and try to
identify larger structures, here is an example that we have already seen using
the continuation principle.
This is an accumulation area where, after an imbalance occurs, the market
generates the bullish breakout and returns to the value area to see if this
discovery is accepted or rejected.
In this case, the attempt to re -enter the value area is rejected, confirming
the acceptance of the imbalance.
and giving rise to the bullish continuation out of the area.
This other example is of similar application, but in reverse.
It is a distribution area where, after a bearish imbalance is created, the
market returns to the value area and confirms the breakout by not reentering
area. This non -reentry takes the form of the reappearance of lower -priced
sellers who use the lower zone of the value areas to enter aggressively and
generate a new bearish impulse.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.