Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Although Richard Wyckoff did not use these terms in his studies, equilibrium
disequilibrium are still the reasoning behind sideways and trend movements.
An accumulation and distribution range, terms that Wyckoff did use, are
precisely equilibrium zones where buyers and sellers exchange their contracts as
a sign of market efficiency, a term used in auction theory.
The same is true of bullish and bearish trends, which essentially represent
inefficiency and imbalance.
Ultimately, The underlying logic of the principles of the Wyckoff method is
based on exactly this, on auction theory, on the acceptance and rejection
certain areas.
And this is what I try to convey to anyone who suggests that this approach
outdated and totally inappropriate for today's markets.
We also have the principle that the market, in order to facilitate trading
between its participants, will always seek to return to previous areas of high
activity, where both buyers and sellers exchanged a large number of contracts.
The principle is extremely useful for more accurate analysis and for locating
logical profit -taking zones.
One of the key concepts is the change in the perception of value.
When traders at the aggregate level converge in their valuations, sideways
ranges develop.
And it is only when an event occurs that causes these valuations to change that
the imbalances occur that cause the perception of value to migrate.
And if we look closely, in the end, All accumulative and distributive structures
implicitly carry this change in value perception and, to a greater or lesser
extent, the P and B turning patterns will always be visualized.
A bullish reversal with the pattern BP is implicitly an accumulation whose
change in value perception may lead to higher prices.
The B can be identified with the first part of the development of the structure
and the P with the second part.
the shock being the one that creates the base of the P and gives rise to the out
-of -range imbalance.
On the other hand, a bearish turn with a PB pattern is nothing more than a
distribution that will have a longer or shorter duration, which has been
confirmed by the value generation in the P and the value migration in the B, so
it is highly probable that lower prices will follow.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.