Original subtitles

"Born indefinitely, you will not

win the fight. We show up to win!"

"Our culture needs a lot of you young

people in here to step up and stand out."

"There is nothing, or no principality,

power, division, devil can stop us when united."

"They can only get you when you're divided."

"When I see the American flag, I see us progressing to

something that can be awesome and great."

"And if you don't plan on winning

things, you might as well go on the day."

[Music]

Ladies and gentlemen, gentlemen and

ladies, welcome back to The Officer Tatum Show.

For some reason, I've been kind of cold lately. That's why I'm

wearing this hoodie over top of

my head like a lunatic. But we got a lot to talk about today.

And I know I say that every day,

but every day is a bunch of stuff to talk about. There's a part

of me that want to take a break

and not get on the internet at all and just let it go. You know

what I'm saying? Because I realize

human beings, I have lost faith in them. The

sheer amount of stupidity, cult-like behavior

that I've seen over the internet since Charlie's passing and

this Israeli war stuff has just

turned me off, bro. Like I can't believe

humans are this stupid and naive and cult-like and

keyboard warriors. I can't believe it. But

I guess it's my turn. Everybody has to face

the music of reality of how ignorant people can be. And I guess

it's my turn. But the conspiracies

around Charlie Kirk's death has just been

something that just continues to bother me.

And it's because there are people who are out

here spreading misinformation intentionally.

And it's kind of weird and sad. It's

really, really sad because it's like, why?

Why? Why if you're doing an investigation

and a deep dive into Charlie Kirk's death,

why are you not exposing some

fact-based things that are court documents?

Stuff that's established in the court

that's going to be used in the trial.

Why are people evading evidence-based court

documents when they talk about this topic?

So I'm going to have Nick put this on the screen and I'm just

going to read a little bit of it

because I think people have not actually heard evidence that's

going to be submitted to the court,

or they had been submitted to the court,

that they are going to use in this trial

against the alleged shooter of

Charlie Kirk. And so therefore people are,

they got all these mysteries out

here and rumors and skepticism and

and let me just clear some things up for you guys.

If you're interested, let's go down

to, I could scroll down and get it.

Let's go down to the end of page

four because on this document, right,

you see this in the fourth district court, a judicial district

court, Utah County state of Utah,

case numbers here, information here, plaintiff is here.

And then the first is the defendant, which

is this idiot. I don't like to say his name.

And then it goes through and this is pretty

much the document that's submitted to the court

of probable cause, what charges they're going to charge him

with. Right. These are the charges.

These are the articulable reasons

why each charge is going to be charged.

And it's all there. So if you're going to

speculate or want to know more about it,

you need to read this stuff. Probable cause statement.

The probable cause statement is the

most important document that one can have,

retrieve or read as it relates to the shooting. This is the

actual evidence that they are going

to present, which they claim they have

evidence of. You cannot fluff this. You cannot deviate

from this or you have no trial. So everything that you see when

I read this probable cause statement,

everything that you see here, they have the

evidence of this that they present to court

in their initial hearing. And they can't fluff it and say this

and this is this without evidence.

And I'm going to try to read it with you guys. I'll try to scan

it if you can follow along with me.

I'm going to start with probable cause

statement. Brian Davis of the Utah State Bureau of

Investigations have probable cause to believe that the

defendant committed the above list of

defenses submitted the following evidence

in support of the filing of this information.

On September the 10th, 2025, at approximately 12 23 PM, Mr.

Charlie Kurt was shot and killed

while speaking to the large crowd on the campus of University

or Utah Valley University in Utah.

Counts one and two says police found the

suspect murder weapon, a bolt action 30-06

rifle nearby. Over the next approximately 33 hours police

conducted a manhunt for a shooter

until the evening of September 11, 2025,

when Tyler James Robinson surrendered to police

at the Washington County Sheriff's Office.

DNA consistent with Robinson was found on the

rifle's trigger. After shooting Mr. Kirk, Robinson hid the gun.

Count three discarded the clothing

that he wore when he fired the rifle, count

four, and told his lover roommate to delete

incriminating text messages and not to talk to police. Count

six, children were present at the

time of the shooting, count seven. Now some people are saying

the FBI lied because Charlie's kids

weren't there. They're not charging him because Charlie's kids

were there. They're charging him

because there were children present. This

is what you call throwing a book at somebody.

When you are committing a crime in the presence of minors, that

is an additional charge that they

charge you with. There were people there who had kids and in

the presence of those kids he committed

these crimes. That's why he got charged with children being

present. The shooting, I may not

need to go through the whole shooting scenario. We could scroll

through that part. That's pretty

much mundane. I want to go through the surveillance and I'm

going to give this document so you guys

can read it. I'm going to go through the surveillance

investigation, right? Because this is an incredible

part that a lot of people miss out on because they don't know

exactly what the government is even

saying against Robinson. The UVU

surveillance investigation, it says at the moment of the

shooting, UVU police officer, UVU officer was watching the

crowd from an elevated vantage point.

As soon as he heard a shot, he began to scan the area for

threats. Believing the shot came from a

rifle because of the sound, he looked for potential sniper

positions. He noted a roof area,

approximately 160 feet, 160 yards away from Mr. Kirk as a

potential shooting position and rushed

there to look for evidence. The suspect, the suspected shooter

position is adjacent to an open,

publicly accessible walkway to access the suspect's location. A

person must climb over a railing and

then drop to the roof only slightly below. The UVU officer

climbed over the railing and down

onto the roof. He then walked to the suspect

shooting position and confirmed a clear shooting

corridor between the position, between that

position and Mr. Kirk's seat. He also noticed

markings and gravel on the rooftop,

consistent with a sniper having laid on the roof,

impressions of gravel, potential left by the

elbow, the knee, and the feet of the person

in a prone shooting position. This is what

they're telling the courts with evidence.

Okay, so they obviously took pictures of this

prone position and they submitted this to the

court as evidence. And obviously they got to

submit this to the defense. Police reviewed

the surveillance cameras covering the roof and discovered that

the recording or that it recorded

an individual dressed in dark clothing, crossed the railing

from the public walkway and dropped

onto the roof on approximately 12 15 pm. Although the

individual moved out of the camera's view for

a short time, the camera again captured the

individual running across the rooftop and then

low crawling to the area of UVU

officers recognized as where the suspect sniper

had dropped into the prone shooting position. So they have

evidence, video footage that they may

not have showed the public that they are showing the courts via

this affidavit and probable cause

statement that they show him running to his

shooting position and going in low crawling to a

prone position. After the shooting after the

short time which matched the known time of the

of the shot, the individual arose and

and ran across the roof to the northeast.

This discovery led to an intensive review of the UVU

surveillance recordings and attempted

to track and identify the suspect. Surveillance revealed that

surveillance revealed the following

at approximately 11 51 am the suspect centered or entered a

campus from the north. He is seen wearing

a black shirt with an American flag in the center and a dark

baseball cap and large glasses or

sunglasses. Throughout the surveillance, the suspect keeps his

head down and rarely raises his head

enough to get a clear image of his face. As he

proceeded across the campus, he is seen walking

with a unusual gait. The suspect walked with this little walk

with a very little bend to his right

leg, consistent with a rifle being held in the pan in his

pants. The unusual gait continued until

the suspect is seen crossing the railing over the open walkway

onto or and onto the roof where he

leaves the camera the camera's view. Now with

that being said, they are articulating evidence

of a camera that they have submitted to court. I haven't seen

this video, they haven't released

this video to the public, but they released it to the court

which will be visible from the judge

and the defense attorney. A camera later captured the suspect

running across the roof to the suspect

shooting position. Immediately after the shooting, the shot was

fired. A camera captured the suspect

running across the roof carrying an item whose shape is

consistent with the rifle. The suspect

is then seen climbing down from the roof. He

appeared to drop the item he was carrying as he

hit the ground in a controlled fall. He then picked up the item

and ran towards the northeast end of

campus. Expanded crime scene. Law enforcement

officers followed the suspect escape path to a

northeast end of the campus where they believed that the

suspect left campus and entered into a

wooded area. In the wooded area investigators found a bolt

action rifle wrapped in a towel.

The rifle contained one spent round and three

unspent rounds. So this is what people need to

understand is that a spent round means that a

bullet was fired from the from the gun but he

did not eject the round. He left the spent casing in the round

I mean inside the gun barrel. So what

does that mean? They are submitted evidence of his DNA finger

on the trigger of a gun that was fired

with the shell casing still in the gun. So I don't know I don't

know what anybody would think but

there's a spent casing in the gun. So that means that at some

point his finger was on that trigger

and shot a round out of that gun

that left the spent casing in it.

This is consistent with the fact that officers

observed at the time of an immediate after the

shooting no shell casings were found on the roof suggesting

that a bolt action rather than an

automatic loaded weapon and only a single round was fired. And

why would you use a 30 out of 6

and not eject the round because you don't

want to leave evidence at the crime scene.

Okay. Here's a little bit of the evidence of what was written

on the gun or whatever all this is

submitted into the court. The rifle

ammunition rounds and the towel were sent to forensic

processing. DNA consistent with Robinson's was found on the

trigger other parts of the rifle,

the fire cartridge casings, two of the

three unfired cartridges and the towel.

Law enforcement officer was unable to immediately locate the

shooter. So they published photos of

the shooter from the UVU surveillance camera

and asked for the public's help to identify him.

Meanwhile, law enforcement continues to try

to identify the shooter through other means.

Washington County investigation. On the evening of September

11, 2025, a law enforcement continued

their investigation of dumb dumb when the

Washington County Sheriff's office with his

parent with his parent. Hello, let me see

that. It says went to so the dumb dumb went to the

Washington County Sheriff's office with his

parent and a family friend to turn himself in.

Robinson's mother stated the following two

police. Now I want you guys to understand this.

This is recorded documentation that they submitted to court.

I'm going to keep telling you this

because they will not and cannot write in

the affidavit or probable cause statement

that something happened that they do not have evidence of

happening. So it says Robinson's

mother stated the following two police on

September 11, 2025. The day after the shooting,

Robinson's mother saw the photo of the shooter in the news and

thought the shooter looked like her

son. Robinson's mother called her son and asked him where he,

where he was. Now they're not going

to say, and I'm just telling you about evidence. They're not

going to say that Robinson's mother

called her son and asked where he was by taking her word for

it. They are going to have electronic

communication from her phone that's submitted into evidence of

this actual phone call taking place.

He said he was at home sick and that he

also been at home sick on September the 10th.

Robinson's mother expressed concern that her husband that are

to her husband that the suspect

shooter looked like Robinson. Robinson's father agreed. These

are statements submitted to the

court. So now we have for all the conspiracies out there and people that are not reading this

document that's old now, but these are testimonies from his

parents. Okay. Robinson's mother explained

that over the last year or so, Robinson had become more

political and had started to lean more to the

left becoming more pro gay trans rights oriented. She stated

that Robinson's began to date his

roommate, a biological male who was transitioning his gender.

This resulted in several discussions

with family members, but especially between

Robinson and his father who was very difficult,

who had very difficult political views.

And one conversation between the shooter,

Robinson mentioned that Charlie Kirk would be

holding an event at UVU, which Robinson said

that was a stupid venue for the event.

Robinson accused Kirk of spreading hate.

Robinson's father reported that when

his wife showed him the surveillance image

of the suspect shooter in the news, he agreed that it looked

like their son. He also believed

that the rifle that the police suspected the shooter to use

match the rifle that was given to

his son as a gift. This is his parents giving

statements to law enforcement regarding this

this information here. As a result,

Robinson's father contacted his son,

asking him to send a photo of the rifle. They have electronic

communication between the father

and son regarding him asking him about the rifle. Okay.

Robinson did not respond. However,

Robinson's father spoke on the phone with Robinson. Robinson

implied that he planned to take his own

life. Robinson's parents were able to convince him to meet at

their home. This is statements that

were given to the police by Mr. Robinson on Robinson's dad.

This is not conjecture. This is

not conspiracy. This is documented evidentiary stuff that had

been entered into evidence with

the court that this is what the father had said. As they

discussed the situation, Robinson implied

that he was the shooter and stated that he

couldn't go to jail, just wanted to end it.

When asked why he did it, Robinson

explained there is too much evil in the in the guy,

Charlie Kirk, spreading too much hate. This is what he said to

his father that was given to the

police testimony. They talked about Robson's

turning himself in and convinced Robinson to

speak with his family friend who is a retired deputy sheriff.

At Robinson's father's request,

the family friend met with Robinson and his parents and

convinced Robinson to turn himself

in. So now you got the sheriff deputy who was

a friend who is now testifying to this reality

that the parents had consulted him or communicated with him to

agree to get Robson to turn himself

in. The family friend spoke to police and reported telling

Robson that it was in his best interest

or it would be best if he brought all evidence with him to the

sheriff's office to avoid police

having to search his parents home. The family

friend also asked Robson if he had any clothes

that were related to what he did. Robson replied that he had

disposed of the clothing in a different

area. The roommate, police interviewed Robson's roommate, a

biological male who was involved in

a romantic relationship with Robson. The roommate told police

that the romantic or the roommate

received messages from Robson about the

shooting and provided those messages to police.

So they contacted the roommate. The roommate

gave over evidence to the police regarding the

communication between him and Robson. These

statements that are given are evidence given

or presented in the initial hearing is going

to be presented in initial hearing before judge.

If anything that is said in here is not true or backed up by

evidence, it is inadmissible in

court and thrown out. I just want people to be aware of that.

On September 10, 2025, the roommate

received a text message from Robson which said, "Drop what

you're doing, look under the keyboard."

The roommate looked under the keyboard and found a note that

stated, "I had the opportunity to take

Charlie Kurt and I'm going to take it." Police found a

photograph of this note. That's another

point of evidence that they have to submit to the court. The

following text exchange then took place.

After reading the notes, the roommate responded, "What? You're

joking, right?" And then we know

we see the text exchange that everybody has

been talking about. And I want you to understand

points here. Let's go up real quick. When you see, this is

not... Okay, just so you guys know,

these are text messages. This is not a

discord message. So this is not appearing to the

investigators and they're extracting of

the conversations, not appearing like this.

It's in the phone, messages that were

there, some messages that were deleted,

that through forensic evidence, they can extract. That's why

you see the dot, dot, dot here and

dot, dot, dot here because they're skipping around and showing

conversations here. They skip into

this conversation and dot, dot, dot. They skip into another

conversation and then they're skipping

around to other conversations. So all of this is not one

consistent direct conversation. These are

skips in conversational texts that they put together and put it

on the forum so you can see it.

But this is not what they saw. They're

recovering this from an actual cell phone.

And I think that everybody in America has probably looked at

these text messages. I don't think I

need to read them again. I think we all are seeing these. I

don't think there's anything new in this.

But some people are saying he don't say the word vehicle and

all this other stuff. And it's like,

we got plenty of videos of him using the word

vehicle when he's talking about a car. We got

plenty of video of people who say nobody used the word vehicle

and they're using the word vehicle.

You know, it's, it's, you know, I think people should just

listen to it. Let them explain it in

court before you make a judgment. But for

people saying, nobody talks like this, this is not,

this is not, most people aren't killers either. Most people

aren't deranged enough to go and kill

a person because they don't like what they

had to say. Search of Robinson's residence.

Let's look at that real quick. Police executed a search warrant

of Robinson's residence. During

the search, police discovered shell cases with etched or

etchings like the etchings found on

the shells in the rifle near UVU. So when it

got to his place, they found also other etchings

at his house that were consistent with the essence they found

on the scene. Police also found several

targets with bullet holes in Robinson's home. So that tells you

that it appears that he was going

target shooting and practicing. So they found targets with

bullet holes in it. Can't say that

for a fact, but it can be perceived that way based on the

totality of circumstances. Count one,

it says aggravated murder pertaining to Robinson's shooting and

killing of Charlie Kirk and manner

exposed others. Okay. These are just the counts of the murder.

And then they ended the, the, the,

the affidavit this way. Now, why am I saying

this? It's because I think people need to realize

that there is a plethora of evidence.

There are family members who told investigators

that their son, they believe their son did this. Now, if you

take just what's in the probable

cause statement to trial, I think that this pretty much is a,

is an open and shut case. I think they

can win this at 80% if you just took the probable cause to

trial, just that nothing else. However,

the key to this being a shut open and closed

case is if after the autopsy, well, the autopsy

has already been done, but the findings of the autopsy, if that

round that was lodged in Charlie

Kirk's body after being test fired, meaning

that they're going to take that rifle and they're

going to test fire it in a lab and every rifle barrel has

striations that are consistent only

with that rifle. It's almost like a fingerprint. So they're

going to fire rounds through that

barrel and then they're going to compare the bullet that they

found in Charlie with the caliber and

bullet that they test fire to see if it lined up with the being

consistent with firing from the

barrel of that gun. If they have evidence that that bullet

matched that gun and that shell casing

there's nothing else to be said. If they don't, if they find

that that gun didn't match the 30 out of 6,

then they got some explaining to do. And

I wouldn't say explaining to do it just

mean that they don't have the right

person. But when you have a person's father

and mother tell police that they

believe this is their child and

we don't have other parents saying that they believe that was

their child. These are the parents

that said they believe this is their child. You have a missing

rifle that the father noticed that

it looked like the rifle that was gifted to him. Why would his

parents lie on their son and he didn't

have nothing to do with it? I know that people have come out

and said that the family don't think he

did it. People that I've heard say that is saying that they

talking to a third-party person that's

associated. They're not talking to the parents.

They're talking to a third-party person that's

saying the parents are saying this. Maybe the parents could

change that too because they don't

want them to get the death penalty. But when you go to the

police and you make a statement

to say, "I think it was my son." Oh, do you really? Why do you

think it's your son? Because when we

saw the surveillance this is what we saw. Well, I saw the gun

and I think it was the missing gun that

was gifted to my son. Oh, his DNA is found on

that same gun on the trigger, not just holding

the gun, but on the trigger of the gun. DNA is found on the

shell casings. DNA is found on the tile.

You know, at some point people got to

realize that it's not beneficial for you to push a

conspiracy theory. What's beneficial for you to do is for you

to wait until the evidence is fully

exposed so that you have something to go off of. And I'll add

to the other conspiratorial stuff.

It's okay to question things. It's okay to want answers, but

don't be a D-bag and don't be a

mindless idiot listening to everything you hear on the internet

as facts and truth, saying that

the lapel mic exploded on Charlie and killed him is the

dumbest, most ignorant thing I ever heard in

my life. You got to understand energy. Like, if you have a

lapel here, and I hope he go to,

he burn in hell for what he's saying because he's a liar. He

know he a liar. What is his name? Pete?

What is his name? Stu Peters. I hope he burn in hell for being

a liar and a devil. You got, you have

a microphone that's only connected to your shirt with a magnet

on the backside. You're telling me

that had a projectile shoot out of the lapel

into Charlie's neck, which caused his injury.

It didn't shoot on the same side the

lapel shot on. It shot around the other side

because there's no entry room. I know that for a fact. The

autopsy revealed that there's no

entry exit. It's only an entry room. That's a

fact. Now for you to think that this exploded

with a munition that fired out and projected out with no

anchor, that, that, that thing is going

to sit here and project a two, two, three round out of it,

which essentially went into his body

and down his back. What are you saying?

What are you, what are you really saying?

It's the dumbest thing ever. It exploded, but

it didn't blow up on his shirt. It had no stain,

no explosion. It's just shot around out of it. How, how could,

how could that propulsion be possible?

You don't have any anchor of the device. So

once you, once the bullet propels out of it,

there's going to be an opposite and equal reaction. That means

that it's going to go like this

unless you got a stable platform. Have you ever had a gun and

then you pull the trigger on it,

you're not holding a gun. What's going to happen? The gun and

the bullet are going to go like this.

But somehow a lapel on his shirt, we don't even know of

technology that even exists like this,

a lapel on the shirt, shoot a two, two, three round out of it.

And the only anchor is a magnetic

clip on his shirt. And you believe that's what killed

Charlotte. It's the preposterous stuff

that I got a problem with saying, Hey, a 30

odd six tend to do more damage than what it did.

That's a fair argument. And maybe you know, maybe you don't,

but you can't say it's impossible.

How do you know what's possible? I shot

every round except the 30 odd six, but bro,

a three, oh eight to go through through youth as well. Uh, two,

two, three ago, three and through

for 200 yards. Well, you mean every round from a five, five,

six, two, two, three, three, oh eight,

three hundred blackout, uh, uh, seven,

six, two will probably over penetrate

more than likely. And only reason

that around would not over penetrate

especially if you had a, you know, you have

green tip, but if you, if you got a hollow tips,

that may be a different story. Now I don't know if they make

30, I'd say 30 out of six hollow tips.

I don't know if that exists, but one of the reasons we use

hollow tips in law enforcement is

because we don't want over penetration. We

want to, we want the round to hit you and tumble.

So it gets trapped in your body and it don't

go through and through. What you looking for?

Okay. Let me look and see if there's

such thing as a hollow point 30 odd six

because I want to know myself.