All language subtitles for nvn.0910.040

"Born indefinitely,
you will not

win the fight. We show
up to win!"

"Our culture needs a lot
of you young

people in here to step up
and stand out."

"There is nothing, or
no principality,

power, division, devil can
stop us when united."

"They can only get you when
you're divided."

"When I see the American flag,
I see us progressing to

something that can be awesome
and great."

"And if you don't plan
on winning

things, you might as well
go on the day."

[Music]

Ladies and gentlemen,
gentlemen and

ladies, welcome back to The
Officer Tatum Show.

For some reason, I've been kind
of cold lately. That's why I'm

wearing this hoodie over top of

my head like a lunatic. But we got
a lot to talk about today.

And I know I say that
every day,

but every day is a bunch of stuff
to talk about. There's a part

of me that want to take a break

and not get on the internet at all
and just let it go. You know

what I'm saying? Because
I realize

human beings, I have lost
faith in them. The

sheer amount of stupidity,
cult-like behavior

that I've seen over the internet
since Charlie's passing and

this Israeli war stuff has just

turned me off, bro. Like
I can't believe

humans are this stupid and
naive and cult-like and

keyboard warriors. I can't
believe it. But

I guess it's my turn. Everybody
has to face

the music of reality of how ignorant
people can be. And I guess

it's my turn. But the
conspiracies

around Charlie Kirk's death
has just been

something that just continues
to bother me.

And it's because there are
people who are out

here spreading misinformation
intentionally.

And it's kind of weird
and sad. It's

really, really sad because
it's like, why?

Why? Why if you're doing
an investigation

and a deep dive into Charlie
Kirk's death,

why are you not exposing some

fact-based things that are
court documents?

Stuff that's established
in the court

that's going to be used
in the trial.

Why are people evading
evidence-based court

documents when they talk
about this topic?

So I'm going to have Nick put this
on the screen and I'm just

going to read a little
bit of it

because I think people have not
actually heard evidence that's

going to be submitted
to the court,

or they had been submitted
to the court,

that they are going to
use in this trial

against the alleged shooter of

Charlie Kirk. And so therefore
people are,

they got all these
mysteries out

here and rumors and
skepticism and

and let me just clear some
things up for you guys.

If you're interested,
let's go down

to, I could scroll down
and get it.

Let's go down to the
end of page

four because on this document,
right,

you see this in the fourth district
court, a judicial district

court, Utah County state
of Utah,

case numbers here, information
here, plaintiff is here.

And then the first is the
defendant, which

is this idiot. I don't like
to say his name.

And then it goes through
and this is pretty

much the document that's
submitted to the court

of probable cause, what charges
they're going to charge him

with. Right. These are
the charges.

These are the articulable
reasons

why each charge is going
to be charged.

And it's all there. So if
you're going to

speculate or want to know
more about it,

you need to read this stuff.
Probable cause statement.

The probable cause statement
is the

most important document
that one can have,

retrieve or read as it relates
to the shooting. This is the

actual evidence that
they are going

to present, which they
claim they have

evidence of. You cannot fluff
this. You cannot deviate

from this or you have no trial. So
everything that you see when

I read this probable cause
statement,

everything that you see here,
they have the

evidence of this that they
present to court

in their initial hearing. And they
can't fluff it and say this

and this is this without
evidence.

And I'm going to try to read it with
you guys. I'll try to scan

it if you can follow
along with me.

I'm going to start with
probable cause

statement. Brian Davis of the
Utah State Bureau of

Investigations have probable
cause to believe that the

defendant committed the
above list of

defenses submitted the
following evidence

in support of the filing of
this information.

On September the 10th, 2025, at
approximately 12 23 PM, Mr.

Charlie Kurt was shot
and killed

while speaking to the large crowd
on the campus of University

or Utah Valley University
in Utah.

Counts one and two says
police found the

suspect murder weapon, a
bolt action 30-06

rifle nearby. Over the next approximately
33 hours police

conducted a manhunt
for a shooter

until the evening of September
11, 2025,

when Tyler James Robinson
surrendered to police

at the Washington County
Sheriff's Office.

DNA consistent with Robinson
was found on the

rifle's trigger. After shooting Mr.
Kirk, Robinson hid the gun.

Count three discarded
the clothing

that he wore when he fired
the rifle, count

four, and told his lover
roommate to delete

incriminating text messages and
not to talk to police. Count

six, children were present
at the

time of the shooting, count seven.
Now some people are saying

the FBI lied because
Charlie's kids

weren't there. They're not charging
him because Charlie's kids

were there. They're
charging him

because there were children
present. This

is what you call throwing
a book at somebody.

When you are committing a crime in
the presence of minors, that

is an additional charge
that they

charge you with. There were people
there who had kids and in

the presence of those kids
he committed

these crimes. That's why he got
charged with children being

present. The shooting,
I may not

need to go through the whole shooting
scenario. We could scroll

through that part.
That's pretty

much mundane. I want to go through
the surveillance and I'm

going to give this document
so you guys

can read it. I'm going to go
through the surveillance

investigation, right? Because
this is an incredible

part that a lot of people miss out
on because they don't know

exactly what the government
is even

saying against Robinson.
The UVU

surveillance investigation, it
says at the moment of the

shooting, UVU police officer,
UVU officer was watching the

crowd from an elevated
vantage point.

As soon as he heard a shot, he
began to scan the area for

threats. Believing the
shot came from a

rifle because of the sound, he
looked for potential sniper

positions. He noted
a roof area,

approximately 160 feet, 160 yards
away from Mr. Kirk as a

potential shooting position
and rushed

there to look for evidence. The
suspect, the suspected shooter

position is adjacent
to an open,

publicly accessible walkway to access
the suspect's location. A

person must climb over
a railing and

then drop to the roof only slightly
below. The UVU officer

climbed over the railing
and down

onto the roof. He then walked
to the suspect

shooting position and confirmed
a clear shooting

corridor between the position,
between that

position and Mr. Kirk's seat.
He also noticed

markings and gravel on
the rooftop,

consistent with a sniper having
laid on the roof,

impressions of gravel,
potential left by the

elbow, the knee, and the
feet of the person

in a prone shooting position.
This is what

they're telling the courts
with evidence.

Okay, so they obviously took
pictures of this

prone position and they
submitted this to the

court as evidence. And
obviously they got to

submit this to the defense.
Police reviewed

the surveillance cameras covering
the roof and discovered that

the recording or that
it recorded

an individual dressed in dark clothing,
crossed the railing

from the public walkway
and dropped

onto the roof on approximately
12 15 pm. Although the

individual moved out of the
camera's view for

a short time, the camera
again captured the

individual running across
the rooftop and then

low crawling to the area of UVU

officers recognized as where
the suspect sniper

had dropped into the prone shooting
position. So they have

evidence, video footage
that they may

not have showed the public that they
are showing the courts via

this affidavit and probable
cause

statement that they show
him running to his

shooting position and going
in low crawling to a

prone position. After the
shooting after the

short time which matched the
known time of the

of the shot, the individual
arose and

and ran across the roof
to the northeast.

This discovery led to an intensive
review of the UVU

surveillance recordings
and attempted

to track and identify the suspect.
Surveillance revealed that

surveillance revealed
the following

at approximately 11 51 am the suspect
centered or entered a

campus from the north. He
is seen wearing

a black shirt with an American
flag in the center and a dark

baseball cap and large
glasses or

sunglasses. Throughout the surveillance,
the suspect keeps his

head down and rarely
raises his head

enough to get a clear image
of his face. As he

proceeded across the campus,
he is seen walking

with a unusual gait. The suspect
walked with this little walk

with a very little bend
to his right

leg, consistent with a rifle being
held in the pan in his

pants. The unusual gait
continued until

the suspect is seen crossing the
railing over the open walkway

onto or and onto the
roof where he

leaves the camera the camera's
view. Now with

that being said, they are
articulating evidence

of a camera that they have submitted
to court. I haven't seen

this video, they haven't
released

this video to the public, but they
released it to the court

which will be visible
from the judge

and the defense attorney. A camera
later captured the suspect

running across the roof
to the suspect

shooting position. Immediately after
the shooting, the shot was

fired. A camera captured
the suspect

running across the roof carrying
an item whose shape is

consistent with the rifle.
The suspect

is then seen climbing down
from the roof. He

appeared to drop the item he
was carrying as he

hit the ground in a controlled fall.
He then picked up the item

and ran towards the northeast
end of

campus. Expanded crime scene.
Law enforcement

officers followed the suspect
escape path to a

northeast end of the campus where
they believed that the

suspect left campus and
entered into a

wooded area. In the wooded area
investigators found a bolt

action rifle wrapped
in a towel.

The rifle contained one spent
round and three

unspent rounds. So this is
what people need to

understand is that a spent
round means that a

bullet was fired from the
from the gun but he

did not eject the round. He left
the spent casing in the round

I mean inside the gun
barrel. So what

does that mean? They are submitted
evidence of his DNA finger

on the trigger of a gun
that was fired

with the shell casing still in the
gun. So I don't know I don't

know what anybody would
think but

there's a spent casing in the gun.
So that means that at some

point his finger was
on that trigger

and shot a round out
of that gun

that left the spent
casing in it.

This is consistent with the
fact that officers

observed at the time of an
immediate after the

shooting no shell casings were
found on the roof suggesting

that a bolt action rather
than an

automatic loaded weapon and only
a single round was fired. And

why would you use a 30 out of 6

and not eject the round
because you don't

want to leave evidence at
the crime scene.

Okay. Here's a little bit of the
evidence of what was written

on the gun or whatever
all this is

submitted into the court.
The rifle

ammunition rounds and the towel
were sent to forensic

processing. DNA consistent with
Robinson's was found on the

trigger other parts
of the rifle,

the fire cartridge casings,
two of the

three unfired cartridges
and the towel.

Law enforcement officer was unable
to immediately locate the

shooter. So they published
photos of

the shooter from the UVU
surveillance camera

and asked for the public's
help to identify him.

Meanwhile, law enforcement
continues to try

to identify the shooter through
other means.

Washington County investigation.
On the evening of September

11, 2025, a law enforcement
continued

their investigation of dumb
dumb when the

Washington County Sheriff's
office with his

parent with his parent.
Hello, let me see

that. It says went to so the
dumb dumb went to the

Washington County Sheriff's
office with his

parent and a family friend
to turn himself in.

Robinson's mother stated
the following two

police. Now I want you guys
to understand this.

This is recorded documentation
that they submitted to court.

I'm going to keep telling
you this

because they will not and
cannot write in

the affidavit or probable
cause statement

that something happened that they
do not have evidence of

happening. So it says
Robinson's

mother stated the following
two police on

September 11, 2025. The day
after the shooting,

Robinson's mother saw the photo
of the shooter in the news and

thought the shooter looked
like her

son. Robinson's mother called her
son and asked him where he,

where he was. Now they're
not going

to say, and I'm just telling you
about evidence. They're not

going to say that Robinson's
mother

called her son and asked where
he was by taking her word for

it. They are going to
have electronic

communication from her phone that's
submitted into evidence of

this actual phone call
taking place.

He said he was at home
sick and that he

also been at home sick on
September the 10th.

Robinson's mother expressed concern
that her husband that are

to her husband that the suspect

shooter looked like Robinson. Robinson's
father agreed. These

are statements submitted to the

court. So now we have for all the conspiracies out
there and people that are not reading this

document that's old now, but these
are testimonies from his

parents. Okay. Robinson's
mother explained

that over the last year or so,
Robinson had become more

political and had started
to lean more to the

left becoming more pro gay trans
rights oriented. She stated

that Robinson's began
to date his

roommate, a biological male who
was transitioning his gender.

This resulted in several
discussions

with family members, but
especially between

Robinson and his father who
was very difficult,

who had very difficult
political views.

And one conversation between
the shooter,

Robinson mentioned that Charlie
Kirk would be

holding an event at UVU,
which Robinson said

that was a stupid venue
for the event.

Robinson accused Kirk of
spreading hate.

Robinson's father reported
that when

his wife showed him the
surveillance image

of the suspect shooter in the news,
he agreed that it looked

like their son. He
also believed

that the rifle that the police
suspected the shooter to use

match the rifle that
was given to

his son as a gift. This is
his parents giving

statements to law enforcement
regarding this

this information here.
As a result,

Robinson's father contacted
his son,

asking him to send a photo of the
rifle. They have electronic

communication between
the father

and son regarding him asking
him about the rifle. Okay.

Robinson did not respond.
However,

Robinson's father spoke on the
phone with Robinson. Robinson

implied that he planned
to take his own

life. Robinson's parents were able
to convince him to meet at

their home. This is statements
that

were given to the police by Mr.
Robinson on Robinson's dad.

This is not conjecture. This is

not conspiracy. This is documented
evidentiary stuff that had

been entered into evidence with

the court that this is what the
father had said. As they

discussed the situation,
Robinson implied

that he was the shooter
and stated that he

couldn't go to jail, just
wanted to end it.

When asked why he did
it, Robinson

explained there is too much
evil in the in the guy,

Charlie Kirk, spreading too much
hate. This is what he said to

his father that was
given to the

police testimony. They talked
about Robson's

turning himself in and
convinced Robinson to

speak with his family friend who
is a retired deputy sheriff.

At Robinson's father's request,

the family friend met with Robinson
and his parents and

convinced Robinson to
turn himself

in. So now you got the sheriff
deputy who was

a friend who is now testifying
to this reality

that the parents had consulted him
or communicated with him to

agree to get Robson to
turn himself

in. The family friend spoke to
police and reported telling

Robson that it was in his
best interest

or it would be best if he brought
all evidence with him to the

sheriff's office to
avoid police

having to search his parents
home. The family

friend also asked Robson if
he had any clothes

that were related to what he did.
Robson replied that he had

disposed of the clothing
in a different

area. The roommate, police interviewed
Robson's roommate, a

biological male who was
involved in

a romantic relationship with Robson.
The roommate told police

that the romantic or
the roommate

received messages from
Robson about the

shooting and provided those
messages to police.

So they contacted the roommate.
The roommate

gave over evidence to the
police regarding the

communication between him
and Robson. These

statements that are given
are evidence given

or presented in the initial
hearing is going

to be presented in initial
hearing before judge.

If anything that is said in here
is not true or backed up by

evidence, it is inadmissible in

court and thrown out. I just want
people to be aware of that.

On September 10, 2025,
the roommate

received a text message from Robson
which said, "Drop what

you're doing, look under
the keyboard."

The roommate looked under the keyboard
and found a note that

stated, "I had the opportunity
to take

Charlie Kurt and I'm going to
take it." Police found a

photograph of this note.
That's another

point of evidence that they have
to submit to the court. The

following text exchange
then took place.

After reading the notes, the roommate
responded, "What? You're

joking, right?" And
then we know

we see the text exchange
that everybody has

been talking about. And I want
you to understand

points here. Let's go up real
quick. When you see, this is

not... Okay, just so
you guys know,

these are text messages.
This is not a

discord message. So this is
not appearing to the

investigators and they're
extracting of

the conversations, not
appearing like this.

It's in the phone, messages
that were

there, some messages that
were deleted,

that through forensic evidence,
they can extract. That's why

you see the dot, dot,
dot here and

dot, dot, dot here because they're
skipping around and showing

conversations here.
They skip into

this conversation and dot, dot,
dot. They skip into another

conversation and then
they're skipping

around to other conversations.
So all of this is not one

consistent direct conversation.
These are

skips in conversational texts that
they put together and put it

on the forum so you can see it.

But this is not what they
saw. They're

recovering this from an
actual cell phone.

And I think that everybody in America
has probably looked at

these text messages.
I don't think I

need to read them again. I think
we all are seeing these. I

don't think there's anything
new in this.

But some people are saying he don't
say the word vehicle and

all this other stuff.
And it's like,

we got plenty of videos of
him using the word

vehicle when he's talking
about a car. We got

plenty of video of people who say
nobody used the word vehicle

and they're using the
word vehicle.

You know, it's, it's, you know,
I think people should just

listen to it. Let them
explain it in

court before you make a
judgment. But for

people saying, nobody talks
like this, this is not,

this is not, most people aren't
killers either. Most people

aren't deranged enough
to go and kill

a person because they don't
like what they

had to say. Search of Robinson's
residence.

Let's look at that real quick. Police
executed a search warrant

of Robinson's residence. During

the search, police discovered
shell cases with etched or

etchings like the etchings
found on

the shells in the rifle near
UVU. So when it

got to his place, they found
also other etchings

at his house that were consistent
with the essence they found

on the scene. Police also
found several

targets with bullet holes in Robinson's
home. So that tells you

that it appears that
he was going

target shooting and practicing.
So they found targets with

bullet holes in it.
Can't say that

for a fact, but it can be perceived
that way based on the

totality of circumstances.
Count one,

it says aggravated murder pertaining
to Robinson's shooting and

killing of Charlie Kirk
and manner

exposed others. Okay. These are
just the counts of the murder.

And then they ended
the, the, the,

the affidavit this way. Now,
why am I saying

this? It's because I think
people need to realize

that there is a plethora
of evidence.

There are family members who
told investigators

that their son, they believe their
son did this. Now, if you

take just what's in
the probable

cause statement to trial, I think
that this pretty much is a,

is an open and shut case.
I think they

can win this at 80% if you just
took the probable cause to

trial, just that nothing
else. However,

the key to this being a shut
open and closed

case is if after the autopsy,
well, the autopsy

has already been done, but the findings
of the autopsy, if that

round that was lodged
in Charlie

Kirk's body after being test
fired, meaning

that they're going to take that
rifle and they're

going to test fire it in a lab
and every rifle barrel has

striations that are consistent
only

with that rifle. It's almost like
a fingerprint. So they're

going to fire rounds
through that

barrel and then they're going to
compare the bullet that they

found in Charlie with
the caliber and

bullet that they test fire to see
if it lined up with the being

consistent with firing from the

barrel of that gun. If they have
evidence that that bullet

matched that gun and that
shell casing

there's nothing else to be said.
If they don't, if they find

that that gun didn't match
the 30 out of 6,

then they got some explaining
to do. And

I wouldn't say explaining
to do it just

mean that they don't
have the right

person. But when you have
a person's father

and mother tell police
that they

believe this is their child and

we don't have other parents saying
that they believe that was

their child. These are
the parents

that said they believe this is their
child. You have a missing

rifle that the father
noticed that

it looked like the rifle that was
gifted to him. Why would his

parents lie on their son
and he didn't

have nothing to do with it? I know
that people have come out

and said that the family
don't think he

did it. People that I've heard
say that is saying that they

talking to a third-party
person that's

associated. They're not talking
to the parents.

They're talking to a third-party
person that's

saying the parents are saying this.
Maybe the parents could

change that too because
they don't

want them to get the death penalty.
But when you go to the

police and you make a statement

to say, "I think it was my son."
Oh, do you really? Why do you

think it's your son?
Because when we

saw the surveillance this is what
we saw. Well, I saw the gun

and I think it was the
missing gun that

was gifted to my son. Oh,
his DNA is found on

that same gun on the trigger,
not just holding

the gun, but on the trigger of
the gun. DNA is found on the

shell casings. DNA is found
on the tile.

You know, at some point
people got to

realize that it's not beneficial
for you to push a

conspiracy theory. What's beneficial
for you to do is for you

to wait until the evidence
is fully

exposed so that you have something
to go off of. And I'll add

to the other conspiratorial
stuff.

It's okay to question things. It's
okay to want answers, but

don't be a D-bag and don't be a

mindless idiot listening to everything
you hear on the internet

as facts and truth, saying that

the lapel mic exploded on Charlie
and killed him is the

dumbest, most ignorant thing
I ever heard in

my life. You got to understand
energy. Like, if you have a

lapel here, and I hope
he go to,

he burn in hell for what he's saying
because he's a liar. He

know he a liar. What is
his name? Pete?

What is his name? Stu Peters. I
hope he burn in hell for being

a liar and a devil. You
got, you have

a microphone that's only connected
to your shirt with a magnet

on the backside. You're
telling me

that had a projectile shoot
out of the lapel

into Charlie's neck, which
caused his injury.

It didn't shoot on the
same side the

lapel shot on. It shot around
the other side

because there's no entry room.
I know that for a fact. The

autopsy revealed that
there's no

entry exit. It's only an entry
room. That's a

fact. Now for you to think
that this exploded

with a munition that fired out
and projected out with no

anchor, that, that, that
thing is going

to sit here and project a two,
two, three round out of it,

which essentially went
into his body

and down his back. What
are you saying?

What are you, what are you
really saying?

It's the dumbest thing ever.
It exploded, but

it didn't blow up on his shirt.
It had no stain,

no explosion. It's just shot around
out of it. How, how could,

how could that propulsion
be possible?

You don't have any anchor
of the device. So

once you, once the bullet
propels out of it,

there's going to be an opposite
and equal reaction. That means

that it's going to go like this

unless you got a stable platform.
Have you ever had a gun and

then you pull the trigger
on it,

you're not holding a gun. What's
going to happen? The gun and

the bullet are going to
go like this.

But somehow a lapel on his shirt,
we don't even know of

technology that even exists
like this,

a lapel on the shirt, shoot a two,
two, three round out of it.

And the only anchor
is a magnetic

clip on his shirt. And you believe
that's what killed

Charlotte. It's the
preposterous stuff

that I got a problem with
saying, Hey, a 30

odd six tend to do more damage
than what it did.

That's a fair argument. And maybe
you know, maybe you don't,

but you can't say it's
impossible.

How do you know what's
possible? I shot

every round except the 30
odd six, but bro,

a three, oh eight to go through through
youth as well. Uh, two,

two, three ago, three
and through

for 200 yards. Well, you mean every
round from a five, five,

six, two, two, three,
three, oh eight,

three hundred blackout,
uh, uh, seven,

six, two will probably
over penetrate

more than likely. And
only reason

that around would not
over penetrate

especially if you had a,
you know, you have

green tip, but if you, if you
got a hollow tips,

that may be a different story.
Now I don't know if they make

30, I'd say 30 out of
six hollow tips.

I don't know if that exists, but
one of the reasons we use

hollow tips in law enforcement
is

because we don't want over
penetration. We

want to, we want the round to
hit you and tumble.

So it gets trapped in your
body and it don't

go through and through. What
you looking for?

Okay. Let me look and
see if there's

such thing as a hollow
point 30 odd six

because I want to know myself.