Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[Music]
well with the hit Hitler work
um we were interested in um you know the
idea of of of trying to work out what a
work of art does and how well it does it
you know we were kind of we were
thinking well you know if if if a work
of art has a kind of a latent meaning to
it or some apparent sense of of
self-expression that you can look at Vos
uh um some flowers and and see those as
a as a as as an expression of Madness or
Insanity that somehow in the in the in
the the working of the surface or the
the the the manipulation of the paint
that somehow there's this uh um sense in
which the work is motivated by you know
this kind of terrible uh uh pain and
torment that the artist goes through we
were kind of thinking well if this if
that's the case with a vanov painting
maybe you should be able to look at a
Hitler painting and see you know that
there should be some kind of index of of
things to come in in in in the work
before he he you know went on to kind of
be a a mass murderer of of Epic
magnitude but the interesting thing with
the Hitler's work is that the the work
is blank there's no forensic evidence of
what what's to what's to come so we're
just interested in the idea that if a
work of art can say something about the
person how come in the case of Hitler
the work gives no indication there's no
symptomatic pathology in the work that
would then kind demonstrate what the the
kind of the latent sort of evil you know
this this this character you know
putatively putative evil that this
person kind of goes on to express so we
were kind of thinking well you know it's
a very interesting idea that actually if
you kind of think about the 20th century
and the the most evil person in the 20th
century and you have opportunity to look
at the work you know that actually it's
blank you know maybe the idea of of
being evil is being blank rather than
but also it's not especially blank no
it's just it's it's indistinguishable
from from thousands and thousands of
other pieces of of sort of second rate
art that was made around the same time
so it's kind of you know it's you know I
I think a person might be tempted to
think oh no it's it's it's it's devoid
it's especially devoid you know
psychosis but it's not there's nothing
there nothing there's something
interesting about the idea of the the
the absolute the absolute identity of
Hitler as a as a as a an unmistakable um
uh irreducible entity and the anonymity
of the work you have the two things
which are just completely opposite ends
of spectrum one is the absolute the
absolute presence of a of a of a of a
known entity and then the other thing
which is this kind of vacuous
superficial um you know ethereal thing
which is this kind of these the work
which which is is which so far
undermines and under repesent the
enormity of the individual so we're kind
of interested in how how those two
things work and the idea of actually
well you know
um uh drawing on these things just seems
it's it's there's lots of things
involved in it the idea that actually
you know that that that we are we are
destroying a um a limited resource a
limited uh set of objects which in some
ways you know um they should they should
they shouldn't be drawn on because they
should stand as documents which are
historically uh uh they historically
represent this person you know the idea
of drawing on them means to say that
you're actually raising
history and
um yeah it's I mean it and also I mean
it
does there's a point in some people's
argument
that whilst Hitler was making these
drawings and paintings he was still a
normal human being a functioning human
being and if if he had gone to art
school he wouldn't have been this
terrible terrible
Tyrant so kind of you know at a certain
point we decided that if we could jump
in at that point and even ruin that
notion of him then he's you know it it's
kind of it's it's a way of kicking
someone where they can't they can't
defend themselves at all you know
there's there's no point at which Hitler
you know we're going to get hold of
every single thing he's ever done and
change it so he he won't won't ever be
uh rescuable
[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
yeah with the Hitler paintings it would
seemed you know to to be faced with a a
picture by Hitler and to work out what
it is we wanted to do it seemed that you
know if if there was some idea of of of
you know the idea of actually you know
how do you transgress the most
transgressive thing I mean Hitler
painting when you're faced with it it's
it's a kind of it's a very uh disturbing
object you know historically is very
disturbing but the idea of actually
working out how to transgress its value
how to subordinate the the the the the
metaphysical value of its evil to turn
it into something you know and it just
seemed very appropriate for us to paint
little rainbows and and little stars and
um little um just very innocuous and
inoffensive things that what's
interesting is is that actually you know
the most innocuous and inoffensive thing
became the most offensive thing we could
actually turn um pretty little
multicolored rainbows into the most um
um um transgressive element you know
because it seems the most inappropriate
thing was then appropriate you know that
that here you have this thing which is
kind of which is the currency of of of
mass genocide to paint little um
rainbows on it seem to be the most
appropriate thing you know it's kind of
it's about the the mag magnitude of
scale the scale of it the the the the
the the Ridiculousness of it seems
absolutely appropriate um you know that
you know if you wanted you the idea of
thinking of of Hitler turning in his
grave because we painted rainbows on his
pictures is just
fantastically pleasurable fantastic
thought using My Little Pony to kick
Adolf Hitler is entirely appropriate
some people were um you know some people
thought it was the best thing in the
world some thought it was less not so
much you know there were people uh you
know there were you know the responses
are not so you know they're interesting
because in a sense there's no way in
which you can um draw a Hitler's
Hitler's paintings without kind of uh uh
maybe trying to second guess the the
outcome I mean the the work is about the
outcome um and so in some ways you know
those the arguments kind of range from
you know these things should be
preserved as historical documents to um
you know sort of should be destroyed
they should be destroyed or you know
then mid Midway you get kind of death
threats from neo- Nazis saying you've
draw you've drawn on the furrious uh um
you know work and you know so there's
there's a whole range of responses I
mean I think the thing is the the the
historical document one is is
interesting because because because
because in a sense you know if you have
actually and we have had the same um uh
same kind of AR arguments persist with
the Goya working on the Goya drawings um
you know the idea of actually sort of
saying well you know is this a gesture
are we are we simply saying yeah you
know we'll draw on a couple of these
things and see how it works no if we set
ourselves the task of saying we'll draw
on every single thing we can get our
hands on suddenly the the the the threat
and the project becomes much more
um much more worrying you know but
actually what we're saying is is that we
will we can
alter historical documents to the point
where they will become ours rather than
histories you know and in that sense
it's it's you can see the danger of the
project and that's and we're kind of you
know we we are the threat is real and
the threat the threat is because you
know with the Goya things you know we we
we bought the first set of goers drawn
them sold them the money we made we went
to buy the next one so you know and
after maybe two or three four versions
you know the idea of actually you know
that you can actually sort of make your
threats it becomes serious so the idea
actually you know might be a point in
time where people have to hide their
goers or hide their Hitler paintings
because you know it's quite a nice idea
it's like it's like it's like it's it's
it's um it's kind of aesthetic Eola and
it's it's it's malicious there there
it's not it I mean when we say we're
going to do that and it's it's it's real
and I mean you know in interestingly
enough Hitler prices have gone up and
goer prices have gone
up so I you know I think there might be
a point at which we can't afford to buy
the next set of of goers yeah we reach
that point yeah it's you know that I
mean you know it's interesting setting
setting a chain of events in motion not
knowing where that where they're going
to lead you know you you set up a a
process and the process is more is more
important than
you know the the points along that along
that that line you know as Jake said you
know you do the first set of goers
everybody goes that's a funny idea you
do the second one everybody goes oh
this is this is real this isn't kind of
no it's say well why did you do it twice
yeah you know so you have to do it third
time and then say why have you done it
three times
[Music]
[Music]
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.