Original subtitles

All right, you guys, I hope

everyone has been having a good Friday.

What are we going to discuss today?

Well, it has been going viral.

A mere minutes after Charlie Kirk is shot,

there are two men that look rather mysterious.

All right, you guys, I hope

everyone has been having a good chair.

And they take down the camera that's

directly or was directly behind his head.

Why did they do that?

Well, fortunately, I was able to establish

connection with one of those individuals.

And I was also able to see the footage with my own eyes.

What I saw was very interesting, but

what I didn't see was even more interesting.

So let's jump right back into this.

Welcome back to Candace.

[MUSIC]

Okay, rare Friday episode.

I got to do Friday episode here

because this is just so important and

the vultures are circulating above, man.

They are definitely insisting that we stop investigating this.

I should at first let you know that the Senate has voted and

they have passed a bipartisan

resolution to designate October 14th,

which is Charlie's birthday, as Charlie Kirk Remembrance Day.

And I have to say that is a very government maneuver.

Like we get a Martin Luther King Day,

we've got Martin Luther King Boulevard,

John F Kennedy gets a library and a national day of mourning.

But you know what?

You know what I was thinking?

I'd like to just find out who killed them all first.

That's interesting to me.

Who killed them?

Before we get them a library, I'd like to know who did it.

I think that's the best way for us to learn.

The best way for us to remember is to study, right?

That's what I learned at grade school.

That's what we're doing right now.

We're studying this and learning everything.

Let's at first address what many people have been emailing me,

constantly asking me, can't you gotta look into this?

You gotta look into this.

Look at these two strange men.

We're gonna refer to this as camera gate.

It is camera gate.

And I wanna say this shout out to all of the internet sleuths,

the TikTokers, the YouTubers,

those of you who were not playing around

and you noticed this because I did not in the beginning.

But yes, as I said, there's an individual who is at first,

in the moment just after the shooting,

he's like up on the rocks near the car

that Charlie gets taken away in

while he's being carried away.

Let's take a look at that footage actually first.

Let's look at that footage and don't worry,

there's no gore in this episode.

It's difficult for me to even look at that sort of footage.

Take a look.

You can see Charlie's there.

And one of you guys caught this.

You probably didn't even see it there.

And we can get in a little closer.

Do you guys have it slow it down

or do you guys just wanna circle here?

Okay.

Right there.

Right there.

An individual standing there.

Again, I am just amazed at internet sleuths

as I was like, wow, that is very strange.

That person appears to be calmly talking into their phone.

It's like a circus around them.

What's he doing?

Who's he speaking to?

Then just a couple of minutes afterward,

that same individual appears alongside another individual

and he moves Charlie's chair.

That's a crime scene.

That's not good.

And he moves it because he wants to stand on it

as he takes down the cameras or the camera rather

that is just above Charlie's head.

That's the camera that I'm talking about

on the right-hand side.

That's a camera that I'm referring to

and we are going to now take a look at him.

And he is also the individual, as many of you pointed out,

that was near Charlie or just before the assassination.

But let's check out that footage of him

in the immediate aftermath kind of switching around

the cameras, the two of them.

Take a look.

(people chattering)

(people chattering)

Safety team is here.

I just heard them say the active shooter,

Charlie Kirk has been shot.

Charlie Kirk got hit is what the security detail just said.

(people chattering)

(people chattering)

Don't worry guys, we're gonna get closer.

This is just a wide shot so you can see what's going on here

and then we'll get a bit closer.

I know you guys have pulled apart this footage

a million ways and thank you for that.

And here's the closer version of that.

You can see, slow down here, he pulls out the chair.

He stands on it and yes, that is,

would be a big no-no for a crime scene.

You don't move anything.

He takes down the camera that is directly above

where Charlie was sitting and would be able to provide,

therefore, a lot of insight.

And then you can see he kind of sits the camera

onto the desk and it looks like he removes

the SIM card from it or the SD card, if you will,

which we're watching right here.

(people chattering)

So I'm going, I'm going when I saw this footage,

who is that?

Like actually, I should be able to figure this out

because I've got a pretty big network at Turning Point USA.

I'm the person who's wearing shades.

I'm not recognizing the individual

and I reach out to somebody on the inside

and I'm just like, who's this person?

And they tell me the person's name and I go,

"Well, wait a second."

And I look again, I'm like, "I know this person

because it's been a few years, but I know this person.

This person's been around Turning Point

for quite some time, for years, like I said,

back when I was working at Turning Point, early days."

So I'm like, I'm just gonna reach out, obviously,

I know this individual.

I'm gonna reach out and I'm gonna say,

"Hey, what's up with this?

Where is this footage?

Why did you do this?

What were you doing up there on the rocks?

What's up?

This is not the first thing that I would do

if I had just witnessed Charlie Kirk being shot."

And I'll say this right now, he was extremely forthcoming.

As soon as I reached out, I just sent a text

because I still had his number

and he was extremely forthcoming,

immediately got onto the phone.

And first and foremost, I should say,

obviously he's seeing all of these clips going viral

and he is fearful for his family.

He doesn't have any security and people are looking.

And he said, "Look, as you can see in the footage,

I was sitting right to the left or to the left of Charlie

when Charlie got shot.

And I instantly knew that he was not going to be okay.

Instantly knew that he was dead.

And I then, like, as you can see people that are running,

anybody that was in that zone ran to the back

and he caught his breath.

He wanted to check in with and communicate to other people

that were working with and around Turning Point USA.

That's why he's on his phone,

communicating to them what had happened.

That's what he told me.

Then I asked, "Okay, well, what about this camera thing?

Why would you grab the cameras?"

And he says, "Because the first thing that I thought

is that I better secure the footage and be helpful

and give that footage, hand that footage over to the feds."

Well, obviously that's where things get into a pickle

with me because we don't trust the feds, right?

I'm like, "No, we don't trust the feds.

We don't gotta do that.

Just let me have the footage."

I'm like, "Just send me the footage.

Please let me look at it.

There's a lot of conspiracies

that are floating around right now.

People don't know what to believe.

People are doing very, what I would say, credible videos.

People that certainly have the credibility

are ballistics experts that are saying

that what we see in the front is an exit wound,

not an entry wound.

I don't know one way or the other

because I'm not an expert.

I'm getting inundated with messages from people that hunt,

people that are in the military saying

that this had to come, have come from another direction.

This footage could help.

If nothing else, let me help you.

Let me formally debunk that by seeing this footage.

Like, could you send this footage over to me?

Well, he didn't want to send the footage over to me

without checking with Turning Point lawyers.

I said, "Look, technically you own the footage.

You and some other people own the footage.

Let me just see the footage because why go through lawyers?

I just want to see the footage."

And also I asked the question, "Why not just release it?"

We've already seen the worst thing

that you could possibly see from the front.

The front is what is the traumatizing video.

And I understand that he wants to afford his wife

some protection like this has to experience that.

Erika, so many people watching the love of your life

in the last second of their life, it's traumatizing.

I'm traumatized by it, right?

That's not my husband and the father of my children.

And so out of a loyalty to Erika,

he also doesn't want to give more footage to the internet.

But I said, "Look, I'm not going to publish it.

I just want to see it.

And I think you should let me see that

because people trust me.

They know that I'm very serious about this.

I don't care about anything right now

other than figuring out who killed Charlie Kirk."

So in the short run, he agrees that

rather than send the footage,

he will get onto a FaceTime call with me

and he will show me the footage on his computer.

He did that and I watched the footage

and I'm going to tell you what I saw.

And to the people specifically,

the people that are in the military,

people that know weapons,

I'm telling you this because you might be able

to add more color or more clarity here,

what you would expect to see.

Given the weapon that they have said did this,

the bullet they have said did this,

I don't know anything about any of this.

So I'm just telling you what I saw, okay?

First and foremost, there is nothing gory

about this shot at all.

And so again, I am still going to work with him

to get me the footage so that,

I think it should be shared.

There's nothing gory about this footage from the back.

The thing that really stood out to me

and I just kept asking him to replay it

over and over and over again,

is that there's no blood.

There's no blood from the back.

There is no blood.

So I think a lot of people were wondering

whether or not that bullet pierced and went out to the back.

I think I vaguely even remember,

and Skylar, you can maybe live look this up,

but I thought the feds were saying

they were looking for a bullet at some point,

which is now very alarming to me.

I don't understand that.

How could they have been looking for a bullet?

Because if I'm not seeing, and there isn't,

I'm telling you, what happens in the front

is not what happens in the back at all.

If I'm not seeing any blood,

what are we to take from that?

The only thing that could make sense

if what they're saying is true

and that person took the shot from the place

that they are saying that individual took the shot from,

it would suggest that it was inside of Charlie, right?

And they would know that.