All language subtitles for nvn.0910.002

All right, you guys, I hope

everyone has been having
a good Friday.

What are we going to
discuss today?

Well, it has been going viral.

A mere minutes after Charlie
Kirk is shot,

there are two men that look
rather mysterious.

All right, you guys, I hope

everyone has been having
a good chair.

And they take down the
camera that's

directly or was directly
behind his head.

Why did they do that?

Well, fortunately, I was
able to establish

connection with one of those
individuals.

And I was also able to see the
footage with my own eyes.

What I saw was very
interesting, but

what I didn't see was even
more interesting.

So let's jump right back
into this.

Welcome back to Candace.

[MUSIC]

Okay, rare Friday episode.

I got to do Friday episode here

because this is just so
important and

the vultures are circulating
above, man.

They are definitely insisting that
we stop investigating this.

I should at first let you know
that the Senate has voted and

they have passed a bipartisan

resolution to designate
October 14th,

which is Charlie's birthday, as
Charlie Kirk Remembrance Day.

And I have to say that is a
very government maneuver.

Like we get a Martin Luther
King Day,

we've got Martin Luther
King Boulevard,

John F Kennedy gets a library and
a national day of mourning.

But you know what?

You know what I was thinking?

I'd like to just find out who
killed them all first.

That's interesting to me.

Who killed them?

Before we get them a library,
I'd like to know who did it.

I think that's the best way
for us to learn.

The best way for us to remember
is to study, right?

That's what I learned
at grade school.

That's what we're doing
right now.

We're studying this and
learning everything.

Let's at first address what many
people have been emailing me,

constantly asking me, can't you
gotta look into this?

You gotta look into this.

Look at these two strange men.

We're gonna refer to this
as camera gate.

It is camera gate.

And I wanna say this shout out to
all of the internet sleuths,

the TikTokers, the YouTubers,

those of you who were not
playing around

and you noticed this because I
did not in the beginning.

But yes, as I said, there's an
individual who is at first,

in the moment just after
the shooting,

he's like up on the rocks
near the car

that Charlie gets taken away in

while he's being carried away.

Let's take a look at that
footage actually first.

Let's look at that footage
and don't worry,

there's no gore in
this episode.

It's difficult for me to even look
at that sort of footage.

Take a look.

You can see Charlie's there.

And one of you guys
caught this.

You probably didn't even
see it there.

And we can get in a
little closer.

Do you guys have it
slow it down

or do you guys just wanna
circle here?

Okay.

Right there.

Right there.

An individual standing there.

Again, I am just amazed at
internet sleuths

as I was like, wow, that
is very strange.

That person appears to be calmly
talking into their phone.

It's like a circus around them.

What's he doing?

Who's he speaking to?

Then just a couple of minutes
afterward,

that same individual appears alongside
another individual

and he moves Charlie's chair.

That's a crime scene.

That's not good.

And he moves it because he
wants to stand on it

as he takes down the cameras
or the camera rather

that is just above Charlie's
head.

That's the camera that
I'm talking about

on the right-hand side.

That's a camera that I'm
referring to

and we are going to now take
a look at him.

And he is also the individual,
as many of you pointed out,

that was near Charlie or just
before the assassination.

But let's check out that
footage of him

in the immediate aftermath kind
of switching around

the cameras, the two of them.

Take a look.

(people chattering)

(people chattering)

Safety team is here.

I just heard them say the
active shooter,

Charlie Kirk has been shot.

Charlie Kirk got hit is what the
security detail just said.

(people chattering)

(people chattering)

Don't worry guys, we're
gonna get closer.

This is just a wide shot so you
can see what's going on here

and then we'll get
a bit closer.

I know you guys have pulled
apart this footage

a million ways and thank
you for that.

And here's the closer
version of that.

You can see, slow down here,
he pulls out the chair.

He stands on it and
yes, that is,

would be a big no-no for
a crime scene.

You don't move anything.

He takes down the camera that
is directly above

where Charlie was sitting and
would be able to provide,

therefore, a lot of insight.

And then you can see he kind
of sits the camera

onto the desk and it looks
like he removes

the SIM card from it or the
SD card, if you will,

which we're watching
right here.

(people chattering)

So I'm going, I'm going when
I saw this footage,

who is that?

Like actually, I should be able
to figure this out

because I've got a pretty big network
at Turning Point USA.

I'm the person who's
wearing shades.

I'm not recognizing
the individual

and I reach out to somebody
on the inside

and I'm just like, who's
this person?

And they tell me the person's
name and I go,

"Well, wait a second."

And I look again, I'm like,
"I know this person

because it's been a few years,
but I know this person.

This person's been around
Turning Point

for quite some time, for
years, like I said,

back when I was working at Turning
Point, early days."

So I'm like, I'm just gonna
reach out, obviously,

I know this individual.

I'm gonna reach out and
I'm gonna say,

"Hey, what's up with this?

Where is this footage?

Why did you do this?

What were you doing up there
on the rocks?

What's up?

This is not the first thing
that I would do

if I had just witnessed Charlie
Kirk being shot."

And I'll say this right now, he
was extremely forthcoming.

As soon as I reached out,
I just sent a text

because I still had his number

and he was extremely
forthcoming,

immediately got onto the phone.

And first and foremost,
I should say,

obviously he's seeing all of
these clips going viral

and he is fearful for
his family.

He doesn't have any security
and people are looking.

And he said, "Look, as you can
see in the footage,

I was sitting right to the left
or to the left of Charlie

when Charlie got shot.

And I instantly knew that he
was not going to be okay.

Instantly knew that
he was dead.

And I then, like, as you can see
people that are running,

anybody that was in that zone
ran to the back

and he caught his breath.

He wanted to check in with and
communicate to other people

that were working with and
around Turning Point USA.

That's why he's on his phone,

communicating to them what
had happened.

That's what he told me.

Then I asked, "Okay, well, what
about this camera thing?

Why would you grab
the cameras?"

And he says, "Because the first
thing that I thought

is that I better secure the
footage and be helpful

and give that footage, hand that
footage over to the feds."

Well, obviously that's where
things get into a pickle

with me because we don't trust
the feds, right?

I'm like, "No, we don't
trust the feds.

We don't gotta do that.

Just let me have the footage."

I'm like, "Just send
me the footage.

Please let me look at it.

There's a lot of conspiracies

that are floating around
right now.

People don't know what
to believe.

People are doing very, what I
would say, credible videos.

People that certainly have
the credibility

are ballistics experts
that are saying

that what we see in the front
is an exit wound,

not an entry wound.

I don't know one way
or the other

because I'm not an expert.

I'm getting inundated with messages
from people that hunt,

people that are in the
military saying

that this had to come, have come
from another direction.

This footage could help.

If nothing else, let
me help you.

Let me formally debunk that by
seeing this footage.

Like, could you send this
footage over to me?

Well, he didn't want to send
the footage over to me

without checking with Turning
Point lawyers.

I said, "Look, technically
you own the footage.

You and some other people
own the footage.

Let me just see the footage because
why go through lawyers?

I just want to see
the footage."

And also I asked the question,
"Why not just release it?"

We've already seen the
worst thing

that you could possibly see
from the front.

The front is what is the
traumatizing video.

And I understand that he wants
to afford his wife

some protection like this has
to experience that.

Erika, so many people watching
the love of your life

in the last second of their
life, it's traumatizing.

I'm traumatized by it, right?

That's not my husband and the
father of my children.

And so out of a loyalty
to Erika,

he also doesn't want to give more
footage to the internet.

But I said, "Look, I'm not
going to publish it.

I just want to see it.

And I think you should
let me see that

because people trust me.

They know that I'm very serious
about this.

I don't care about anything
right now

other than figuring out who
killed Charlie Kirk."

So in the short run,
he agrees that

rather than send the footage,

he will get onto a FaceTime
call with me

and he will show me the footage
on his computer.

He did that and I watched
the footage

and I'm going to tell
you what I saw.

And to the people specifically,

the people that are in
the military,

people that know weapons,

I'm telling you this because
you might be able

to add more color or more
clarity here,

what you would expect to see.

Given the weapon that they
have said did this,

the bullet they have
said did this,

I don't know anything about
any of this.

So I'm just telling you
what I saw, okay?

First and foremost, there
is nothing gory

about this shot at all.

And so again, I am still going
to work with him

to get me the footage so that,

I think it should be shared.

There's nothing gory about this
footage from the back.

The thing that really
stood out to me

and I just kept asking
him to replay it

over and over and over again,

is that there's no blood.

There's no blood from the back.

There is no blood.

So I think a lot of people
were wondering

whether or not that bullet pierced
and went out to the back.

I think I vaguely even
remember,

and Skylar, you can maybe
live look this up,

but I thought the feds
were saying

they were looking for a bullet
at some point,

which is now very alarming
to me.

I don't understand that.

How could they have been
looking for a bullet?

Because if I'm not seeing,
and there isn't,

I'm telling you, what happens
in the front

is not what happens in
the back at all.

If I'm not seeing any blood,

what are we to take from that?

The only thing that could
make sense

if what they're saying is true

and that person took the
shot from the place

that they are saying that individual
took the shot from,

it would suggest that it was
inside of Charlie, right?

And they would know that.