All language subtitles for ádfsgfuuuuuuuukdmcasfd65526_Subtitle 1

So I want to play Montel
William Cook first.

All right, let's go to the killer
because this is what we

should be talking about anyway,

the killer.

So I want to play Montel
William Cook first.

This is what we should be talking
about anyway, the killer.

So I want to play Montel
William Cook first.

And to me, beyond the Jew thing,
this is a bigger issue.

The Jew stuff is fantasy world.

The Jews, the Jews, these people
can see Jews in anything, man.

They can be they can be they
can be pouring

some tea and the bag breaking
the tea, the

tea bag breaking.

They like technically the tea

company made their bags
from Israel.

So the Jews are trying
to poison.

You know, technically, Charlie
was a Zionist.

But then he said Benjamin Yahoo
was not doing what he wanted.

So they killed him.

I put my life on it.

Go listen to anybody
who hate Jews.

They will find a way to make Jews
responsible for everything.

They go, what's his name?

Jeffrey Epstein.

It's like it's not about what Jeffrey
Epstein did to the women.

It's about the fact that he
was a part of it.

He was a Jew.

You know, he was messing
with the Jews.

It's like, no, no, he
abused people.

Let's talk about that.

No, no, no.

It's that he was a Mossad agent

blackmailing people connected
to the Jews and nothing

about the victims.

It's about his connection
to Jews.

That's what we see.

Now he may be and I don't care.

I mean, the victim don't care if
he was with the Jews or not.

He was abusing them.

He's going to jail, not from
being with the Jews.

He's going to jail for what he did
to people who were innocent.

What else they say with
the Jews?

The moon landing.

They probably faked it.

The moon landing was fake because
the Jews said it.

Jews got telescopes and the
Jews run the world.

The Jews are struggling
to run Israel.

What you mean they're going
to run the world?

OK.

But the Jews got to be a
part of something.

The Jews run our banks.

The Jews run pornography.

Well, one of the biggest pornographic
sites is OnlyFans.

They're gross.

They're making billions of
dollars more every year

and it's not run by a Jew.

Somebody-- even the porn hub
and all that other--

like the whole conglomerate, I don't
know what the parent name

is.

That's not even run by a Jew.

It just so happened to be a Jew
is in the investment company

but have no ownership
in that thing

because a Jew is in the
investment company.

Therefore, the company is
running pornography

by the Jews.

I just-- even Charlie made a
distinction between Jews

and the secular Jews
who are stupid.

But everybody else got to say all
the Jews run by the Jews.

No, no, run by secular Jews
who are leftists.

That's the Jews we talk-- just
like black folks.

No, don't say black people
support Democrats.

No, them black people support
Democrats.

It ain't black.

It's them blacks.

We ain't doing that.

We don't vote for that stuff.

We are Christians.

We believe in God.

We don't vote for Kamala
Harris because she

ain't even a Christian.

Same thing with the Jews.

No, them Jews are voting
for all this stuff

and donate all their money
to all these causes

and enter pornography.

And all this stuff.

That's them.

These Jews over here, the Dennis
Prayers of the world,

the-- I forget his name now--
Bishapiras of the world,

you name it.

You don't have to like them.

But these-- they ain't pushing
that agenda.

And ain't this funny?

All of the hatred and my opinion
that the Jews get

from these nut jobs, the
Jews are the one

that put the Christians on.

If you claim the turning point
was run by the Jews,

all of us came from
turning point.

All of us.

Almost all of the popular
people that you

see that's at the high and mid
level of popularity

has something to do with turning
point at some point.

They were part of the chapter.

They were part of the Black
Leadership Summit.

They were in the positions
at the highest--

the director positions.

You name it.

If you popular at this
point from 2017,

you came through turning point
at some point in time.

And we ain't going to talk about
turning point faith.

We ain't going to talk about
turning point action.

All these people getting
elected.

The reason Trump is in office is
because turning point action.

OK, now, Dennis Prager.

I have a five minute video.

I don't know how many-- they
have five minute videos

about Christianity.

Prager putting you on.

Then you go to Daily Wire.

Now, I wasn't as involved
in Daily Wire.

Daily Wire and turning point
are like this.

Campus tours with Daily
Wire was doing it

before turning point
was doing it.

And everybody that worked for
Bishop Piero are Christians

except him.

Am I right?

Brett Cooper was a Christian,
I believe.

A Catholic.

Christian Catholic.

Michael Noses a Catholic.

What's the name who don't
like that much?

He did the-- what is the woman?

What is his name?

Matt Walsh.

Matt Walsh is a Catholic.

So you got some of the biggest,
most prominent people who

work for turning point USA were
Catholic and Christians.

I mean not turning point, but
Daily Wire, Catholics

and Christians.

So you know, but the Jews
are the problem.

But the Jews are running
the man.

All right.

Let's get to the clip with
Monte Williams,

because it's crazy.

I wrote a clip.

Talk about a love-torn child.

A kid.

This was probably his first
real relationship.

And somebody was disparaging
the person that he loved.

He sat on that building for 30 minutes
before he took the shot.

Why do you wait until the first
word trans came up?

Then he took the shot.

You think he heard it?

He could hear it.

I think he could hear it.

I think he also--

I don't believe he was motivated
politically.

I think this was motivated
emotionally.

Guys.

Guys.

The evidence here is
overwhelming.

He said, Charlie Kirk, I can't
stand his hate anymore.

I'm going to take him out.

The testimony from him and the
statements of his family,

he had become more left wing.

He etched the statements that
are made by the left

about Republicans and conservatives
and Charlie Kirk

fascists on the bullet cases.

He made a joke about it
in his last text.

But it doesn't sound like
a joke to me,

because someone's dead and
about to be buried.

So it doesn't sound like
a joke to me.

So I'm just telling you,
there is an effort.

There was an effort all weekend
long on the left

to try to make this guy sound
like he was a conservative.

That failed.

That was passed around all
over the weekend.

That has now failed.

The evidence has now come out.

He was motivated by hate.

He was motivated by left
wing radicalism.

He got mixed up with some trans
ideology in his life.

We'll learn more about
that, I'm sure,

when more evidence and
testimony comes out.

We are looking around the edges
of this for something other

than what's staring us
in the face.

Left wing radicalism
got this kid.

He went up to a roof, and he
murdered our friend.

And that's what happened.

Can we, for one second,
understand that?

As we continue, Scott just got
all angry, real mad.

"I'm facing Scott.

Scott, Scott, Scott, Scott."

Why can't we have a discussion
about how long is it

going to take for us to figure
out where they come back to?

Just to be clear, I am angry.

Can we just let him finish
this, Scott?

I am angry. I'll let you do it.

I'll let you talk in
just a second.

Go ahead.

Can we spend as much time figuring
out how we bridge this

and come back together again?

Now you just have a note on
the producer's desk.

I did my show that was
said, we don't

believe in what happens.

We try to figure out
why it happens

and come up with solutions.

Right now, all we're doing is
delivering what happened,

over and over and over
and over again.

We're not going to sit down
and try to figure out

how do we stop it.

We want to stop it.

You've got to go after
left-wing terrorists.

That's actually exactly the
conversation we're having,

is we're acknowledging there's
a problem.

So anybody who disagrees with him
is a left-wing terrorist.

Actually not, but if they
target a conservative

and murder him in brutal
fashion--

Let me answer your question.

That person is a murderer.

We can all acknowledge that.

You said that.

I am angry.

And I'm just telling-- I am
channeling the emotions

of millions of conservatives
who are angry.

They knew Charlie.

They loved Charlie.

They viewed Charlie as a
mainstream conservative

Republican voice who talked
about issues

that millions of Americans
believe.

He also talked about his faith.

And he did it by going to
college campuses, which

are not normally hospitable
to conservatives,

and offering his opponents
a microphone

to have what we always say--

It's support of what?

To have--

It's support of what?

Civil discourse.

Not only that, but it's support
of the First Amendment.

And guess what?

He made sure that people
had an opportunity

to stand in a room and talk.

He was murdered trying to do
what we always say.

Why don't we talk to
each other?

So yes, there is-- it's not
even been a week.

So you're going to have to give
us a little grace on being

angry about somebody who
did what you always

say that we should do.

Let's talk.

More than a week's grace
over to Michigan.

Stop.

I can't stop.

I can't do it.

I can't do it.

These son of a guns.

They jumped to the Michigan
people.

What would it--

why is it we need to find a
way to come together?

They murdered Charlie.

What do you mean?

There ain't no coming together.

I mean, there's no immediate
necessity

to have empathy for this kid and
say, let's come together.

Justice needs to be served.

Then we can talk.

What are you saying?

Let's think about his feelings.

And this is not the time--
no, Charlie's dead.

He ain't coming back.

We don't get a second chance.

Screw this.

I want a cuss.

He ain't getting a second
chance.

What do you mean?

Let's slow down-- no, you shouldn't
say let's slow down

when they were pushing that
rhetoric that he was evil

and he was hateful and
he was a fascist.

That's when you slow down
the rhetoric.

Now that this man done
killed Charlie,

he got to pay the price for it.

I don't hear nothing about
his first love.

Somebody disrespect-- people
say stuff about my--

because I'm married to
a white woman.

Now I'm going to go out to the
store blasting people.

Don't get me started with this
sugar honey iced tea.

When people talk like Montel
Williams, it erages me.

I want to be cool.

But then it enraged me to say, oh,
is this how you guys think?

All right.

I'm not going to say nothing
else because it's cool.

Boy, I want to say something.

Maybe I should do it behind a
paywall or something.

Y'all get my real feelings
out there.

I don't want to hear that.

Oh, we need-- oh, his
first love.

Man, him and his first love.

He killed somebody.

It's not that he went out there
and argued with Charlie

and yelled a little bit because
he was upset about his first

love.

He killed somebody in cold blood
in front of the world.

And y'all want to have
sympathy.

But the thing is, they don't do
that when George Floyd died.

George Floyd is not honorable.

What so mother freaking ever?

He a crackhead, stealing, fighting
the cops when he died.

Charlie Kirk is just expressing
his free speech,

talking about Jesus Christ
before he got killed.

But y'all didn't want to
slow down and ready

when George Floyd got killed.

Y'all didn't say stop burning
these buildings.

Y'all on TV talking about
it's mostly peaceful

and the building is burning
behind you.

People didn't got killed in
these protests in 2020

during the George Floyd riots.

Y'all weren't toning
nothing there.

Y'all didn't want to talk
about nobody issues.

You didn't want to say nothing
about the police officer.

What about the police officer's
feelings?

What about his burnout?

What about the fact he tried to
deal with ends all day?

They don't know how to have
common decency.

Y'all don't want to have no
empathy for a cop

when a cop do something.

But you want to have empathy
for a weirdo

that because he want another
man on top of him

who don't know if he
a man or not,

that somehow he need to
get compassion

because he getting stung
at night.

Just because you gait on me,
you get compassion.

Just because you want to be a--
what they call him?

A fairy.

Y'all lucky I'm saved.

I would be cussing and threatening
people on here

if I wouldn't say, let's
go to Ted Cruz clip

so I can calm down.

This will give me a chance to
take a break and calm down.

Roll the clip.

You said a lot there.

And we don't have a motive yet.

We don't know yet.

We're waiting.

Obviously, we've heard what the
governors had to say

with the--

Of course we know.

But come on, we don't have
a motive yet.

We know what's happening with--

Really?

That's CNN's position.

I think we're law enforcement,
Senator.

He just happened to fire the
gun in celebration.

You can't tell the motive yet.

Senator, that's not
what I said.

And I said law enforcement hasn't
laid out a direct motive.

They've laid out a lot of evidence
here of these messages

and what--

Actually, they have.

They said that he was a
left-wing activist who

hated Charlie Kirk.

Pardon?

Senator, with all due
respect, you

know exactly what I'm saying.

I'm not arguing with you
politically.

I'm saying that law enforcement
has not

put a specific motive.

You know that there's a
difference of what

they're putting in a legal
argument--

That they have.

That's what you're talking
about.

And you're not even--

What you just said is false.

We're not even arguing about--

Stop, stop.

I stop.

Hold on.

Hold on.

They wrote an indictment.

What you mean they don't
have a motive?

He's indicted, fool.

How do they write an indictment
with no motive?

You're telling me they don't
have a motive,

but they have the messages
where he said

that he planned it because he had
an opportunity to take out

Charlie Kirk because he's sick
of him spreading hate.

It's a motive in the
text messages

that they had before they released
it to the public.

You idiot.

And you don't have to know
another freaking thing.

You don't have to know nothing
to tell why he did it, fool.

Why would he kill Charlie at
an event like this?

Because-- I don't need to
see a text message.

He shot Charlie Kirk.

What text message you
need to read?

Play the clip.

What you just said is false.

Senator--

Caitlin?

Caitlin.

Facts-- hold on a second.

Let me answer your statement
because what you said is

factly false.

Senator, with all due respect--

Law enforcement--

With all due respect, you're
putting a lot of statements

that I did not say.

And I want to get back to--

we just laid out the facts in
the opening of the show.

You just said law enforcement
has not

made it out of motive.

That is objectively false.

And we just spoke to the deputy
attorney general.

That is objectively false.

They have not set a concrete motive
of exactly what it was.

They went out every evidence
we know so far.

And CNN should not be engaging
this information.

Caitlin, answer my question.

If you've seen the polling that
shows the vast majority

of Democrats believe this
murderer is

a Republican and a Trump
supporter,

have you seen that polling?

Let me get back to my questions,
though, Senator,

because the question here
was actually--

You're not going to answer
that question?

Are you going to answer
that question?

You were saying about
investigations

that you'd like to see--

So you're not going to answer
the question.

Senator, I'm the one asking
the questions here.

And the question--

No, we're having a
conversation.

I understand that you want to say
things that are factually

false, and then you don't actually
want the facts--

Do you believe that right
wing groups also

are being laid out?

OK, give your speech.

That's not true, Senator.

I'm asking you a question.

Tell me.

Go ahead.

I don't know what your
question is,

because we have a delay because
you're an England.

So I can't hear what
you're saying.

You said that you believe that
left wing groups should

be investigated.

You want to know where
the financing is

coming from for protests.

Do you believe that they
should also

be looking into right wing
groups as well,

or do you believe it should
only be limited to that?

Stupid question.

Look, I believe anyone engaged
in acts of violence

should be prosecuted
and go to jail.

But I will say there has been
an enormous amount,

and CNN has been guilty of this,
of both sides of this.

And gosh, both sides
are violent.

And understand, yes, there is
some violence on both sides,

but it is the left that overwhelmingly
celebrates

this.

It is leftists that have
been celebrating.

You look at Blue Sky, and it is
a cesspool of leftists

celebrating the murder
of Charlie Kirk.

You look at recent polling
that shows over 50%

of Democrats saying violence
against Elon Musk

is justified, violence against
Donald Trump is justified.

You look at Democrats who do things
like what Kamala Harris

did of giving money and urging
people to give money

to bail out violent rioters
and Antifa riots,

it is only one side that justifies
this violence.

My view is if you commit
acts of violence,

you should be prosecuted.

And so, yes, we should
follow the money.

Anyone funding acts of violence,
we should go after.

But this is a left
wing problem.

How can you argue that it's--

I think the argument that people
have been talking about

recently is what's going on with
the Charlie Kirk case.

I think people have raised
that because there

have been other acts of
political violence

as well when it comes to
targeting Democrats.

I mean, we've seen that with
a lawmaker who

was killed in Minnesota this summer
alongside her husband.

We've seen it with the breaking
of Nancy Pelosi.

But the assassin there
was a deranged--

We've also seen it with Justice
Brett Kavanaugh and others.

Hold on a second.

If you're going to say facts, you
need to get your facts right.

The assassin there was not
a right wing assassin

acting on a political motive.

The assassin there was someone
who had been

an appointee of Tim Waltz.

And he was a deranged lunatic.

And yes, there are deranged
lunatics

who attack people both
right and left.

But if you look at murders
carried out

for political agendas, they are
overwhelmingly on the left.

Whether it is the assassination
of Charlie Kirk,

the two assassination attempts
of Donald Trump,

the assassination attempt
on Brett Kavanaugh,

over and over and over
again, whether it

was the congressional
shooter who

came to Washington to the
baseball game and said,

I want to find congressional
base with the Republicans

to attack. And so we've noted
all of those instances.

We noted all of those
instances.

But we're also noting that
there have been others

including the Democratic lawmakers
who were targeted

just a couple of months ago.

So I think that is the point
that people have made here.

But it wasn't by a Republican
for a political agenda.

And by the way, that lunatic
should be prosecuted

and go to jail.

So what I'm not doing is what
leftists are doing.

Leftists are celebrating
that murder.

I think the murder in Minnesota
was horrible.

It was horrible.

And that violent criminal
should be prosecuted

and going to jail.

You would have a point
if I said, gosh,

let's set up a bail fund
for that murderer.

Then you'd have a point.

But it's only one side that
is doing that.

Do you agree that on
Blue Sky there

are thousands of leftists
celebrating and reveling

in the murder of Charlie Kirk?

Senator, I don't think that anyone
should separate someone

regardless of what that person
believed in.

But do you agree that they are?

You're right.

Blue Sky is representative
of how people feel.

If you celebrate it, I think
that's wrong.

And I think that's equal.

It's representative
of leftists.

It's only left-wingers
are on it.

Senator Ted Cruz, thanks for
your time tonight.

She's so stupid.

It's crazy to me.

Y'all, I was struggling
through that.

Because I want to interject
and scream in her face

through this TV.

But this is--

I can't go back in time
or teleport.

I don't know why these people
got to be so disingenuous.

If you're not a left-winger,
why are you

trying to defend left-wing
stupidity?

I will never understand
these things.

It is very clear that it's a
left-wing ideology that

preaches these levels
of violence.

And the thing is that the people
who are mentally ill

are on the left.

There may be a few on the right,
but the overwhelming majority

of these weirdos are
on the left,

hypnotized with hatred.

There has never even been an
assassination attempt

on the leftists in office.

Donald Trump had two of them.

From the skin of his chinny
chin chin,

he didn't get killed after--

when he was-- when he was
at the rally.

He barely almost missed that.

And if they could, they'd
killed him.

We don't know the motive yet.

What do you mean?

They told you the motive.

They could kill-- dude came to
get a gun in a briefcase.

And I know I don't like
Nick Fuentes,

but the dude came to Nick
Fuentes' house.

He killed somebody.

Then he tried to go kill
Nick Fuentes.

What are we talking about?

Stupidity.

Stupid.

I got a bunch of stuff I
want to talk about.

I'm going to get to these
super chats

and we'll get back
to the thing.

Let me get to these super
chats real quick.

I got a bunch of people
super chatting.

I think I see-- I hope people
ain't paying to say stupid

stuff.

And people paying to say
stupid stuff, Nick?

I'm going to go with the
red ones first.

I think we got one red one.

The one that's red.

[INAUDIBLE]

I think they all--

it says, Brandon, at this
point, I feel that you

have to speak about Candace.

I watch you both, and
I'm so confused.

This isn't from a bad place,
so many are just lost

and confused.

What is the truth?

I know I'm not alone.

So many want to hear from you.

So if you guys--

those of you who have wisdom, you
can see that I'm avoiding

bringing up her by name.

Can you see that?

You see that I'm addressing
points.

I'm not addressing her by name.

Why?

Because I have a personal
relationship with her,

and I don't want to
be doing that.

I know a person.

I texted her just yesterday.

We have conversations with
just me and her.

And I don't think it's
necessary for--

I mean, people want clickbait
and want us to argue,

want me to be-- want to be able
to put in their comment

section, Brandon, Tatum,
Candace, Owen.

I don't want to do that.

I can't talk about ideas.

Now, some of these people
that I don't know,

I don't mind blasting them.

But I know her personally, and
I don't want to do that.

I don't want you all to have
clickbait of us arguing

and me dissing her and her,
dissing me and doing that.

We just don't do that.

And they don't mean
we all agree.

I didn't agree with everything
Charlie said.

I don't agree with everything
Candace say.

But you would never see me calling
Charlie out by name.

You would never see me calling
Candace out by name,

and you would never see them
calling me out by name.

It's about the topics.

And these other people,
I don't know them,

and I think that they're evil.

I don't think that Candace
is evil.

So me and her will have a
discussion privately,

but the topics of concern
are the topics.

The ideas that are out there
are the ideas

that I will challenge.

And I know some people may
feel like, oh, you

should do that, do that.

I get what you're saying, and I'm
not mad at you for saying

that, but I just have made
the decision

that I'm not going to be caught
on no camera doing that to one

of my really good friends.

I disagree with certain things
she says, and I pray for her.

These other people, I don't know
them, and they're evil to me.

Don't play this conspiracy
hate game.

It will all come out.

Don't allow these people to
consume your heart.

Don't get sucked in.

Life is balanced.

We carry the burden of entitlement,
of keeping it.

It's what made you and
I a good cop.

Don't let that go.

I'm kind of confused
on that, but I

think I know what you're
saying.

So I wish I could just make
a video and be like,

this is what you're not
going to hit.

They stop asking me, but I'm
addressing the issues

that I brought up.

I'm addressing these things
that I brought up.

Hey, I don't know if you remember
my last message,

but just wanted to let you
know that I did it.

I'm the new Louisiana Citywide
chairman of Lexit.

Unfortunately, I got it the day after
Charlie was assassinated.

I'm sorry to hear that, but
congratulations for you.

Send me a message in
the Super Chat.

I mean, not in the Super Chat,
but send me a message on IG.

What's also weird is that right
before Charlie died,

he told me that he agreed with
me on everything, guys.

The sources is crack
pipe demons.

Trust me, bro.

I mean, that's the weird
part, man.

I don't know.

I just don't believe in sharing
messages from people

that I communicate with unless
they are aware

that I'm going to share a personal
message that they've

communicated to me.

I just don't do that.

I got messages.

I got conversations probably
that I

had with so many other people.

And I don't feel the need to
disclose that stuff,

especially if they die.

At some point, you go, the
person's dead, man.

Let me just ease off this.

I know we had beef or whatever.

Let me just take a break
on this.

There's no way in the world that
if somebody I know personally

died and we disagreed, that I'm
going to mention anything

about our disagreement
for a while.

I don't need to address
that right away.

I don't need to make that a focal
point of my conversation.

I don't need to.

And I view Charlie-- and
I don't know

if he felt the same
way about me.

I have no idea.

I don't know what's in
people's minds.

But I viewed Charlie as a good
guy, a young man,

who was going through life,
learning fast.

He had a variety of ideas.

He was very intelligent.

And he was 31.

I'm seven years older
than Charlie.

And I had kids when Charlie
was young.

I was seven years older
than Charlie.

I had my kid when I was
23 years old.

Charlie wasn't even
an adult yet.

He wasn't known enough to
drive a car yet.

And I already had a kid.

So I have lived a lot of
life or more life

than Charlie has to a
certain degree.

I went to college.

I have the college university
experience.

I've had-- I was a cop.

I played college football.

I grew up in the inner city.

I grew up in the hood.

I have a lot more experience.

And so therefore, things that I

may disagree with, in
my opinion,

therefore things I may disagree
with Charlie on,

I disagree with them.

I don't cast him away because
some of the things

I disagree with him on is I
think it's because of age

and because when you live longer
and you get exposed

to different things, you begin
to think differently.

But I don't feel the need
to air out laundry

when the man ain't been put
in the ground yet.

Let me tell you all, there's things
that people have done

to me, have said to me.

There's organizations who have
treated me unfairly

and treated me fairly like--
back and forth.

And I don't feel the need to
put things out there

in the ethos because just because
my one experience

doesn't mean that's the totality
of the experience.

And sometimes you need to be
cautious of creating

division unnecessarily.

So Brandon Tatum, if I want
to be salacious

and I want to give you the T
and I want to maximize off

Charlie's death, I could tell
you all kind of stories

about Charlie and about
other people.

And I don't have any negative
things to say about Charlie,

but I could tell you all
kind of stuff

that somebody told me, whether
it's negative, positive,

whether--

I go down the whole
rabbit trail.

But why in the-- would I do
that when somebody I claim

I care about has been dead
and been killed?

It's not important to me.

Even if me and Charlie was at
each other's throat,

imagine that.

And we weren't.

But let's just imagine me
and Charlie had beef

and nobody knew because we were
secretly texting each other.

And I was talking to you,
talking to me,

and I'm like, man, f
that dude, man.

I don't want nothing to
do with that dude.

And he dies.

Yeah, that's a lot of tea.

I could tell you all right
before he dies, man.

That's what he said to me.

Look, that's what he said
to me, man.

He a fraud.

He a-- or I could say the movement
is bigger than me.

Unity is bigger than me.

I play a part in this.

It ain't about me.

So when I go to say I got
tea and I got this,

I say, well, it ain't about me.

So you don't need to hear
tea from me.

Let's make it about him.

Let's make it about his legacy.

He ain't here to defend
himself.

I don't need to say nothing

about the man unless
it's flattering

or don't say nothing at all.

And if it's going to
cause division,

I don't need to say nothing.

There's people in the
movement that

have said the craziest things
to me, that have gave me

all kind of tea about this
person, this person,

this person, that person, doing
this with that,

and this another person.

I got all the tea.

Some of y'all favorite people.

If you knew what I knew,
they may not

be your favorite people
no more.

But at the end of the
day, do I feel

like it's absolutely necessary
and life-changing for me

to divulge certain things
that I've

heard about certain people,
it is not.

Is it worth more to do that
and fracture youth

in the way people think
about people

who are doing mostly good?

It's not worth it.

Let me get this last Super
Chat, then

we're going to get back
to the stuff.

Somebody wrote Super Chat,
$99 Super Chat,

I don't want to blast her.

I do not want you to blast her.

I want to know why someone thinks
that way, why you think

some people think that way.

It's a spiritual thing for us
followers at a point

where it's do I need to go to the
Catholic Church, I think,

and get educated question?

I'm spending my money in good
faith and answer.

Listen, I wish you would have
hit me on the inbox

so you wouldn't have to spend
money because in good faith,

I don't mind answering
your question.

The first question was
much different

than this question, in my
opinion, right Nick?

I think this was a little
more explanatory.

So there's multiple reasons why
people think the way they do.

There is religious reasons,
meaning that some people's

religious dogma or religious
ideology

that come from a certain
denomination,

believe certain things that lead
them to a certain point

of interpreting situations
that come about,

interpreting our relationship
with Israel,

interpreting our relationship
with the Bible talks about

the Jewish people or the
chosen people.

It's some people's denominational
theology

that interprets those
things to them.

And if they're committed
to that ideology,

then they only can see it
through this lens.

Or therefore everything they
believe is now fraudulent.

Some people deal with grief
differently,

meaning that some people
have a hard time

compartmentalizing something
so heinous

that have happened to somebody,
therefore they lash out

in ways in which that are maybe
not as productive

because they don't have no
other way to lash out.

Like you see somebody watch a
horrific thing happen

and they laugh.

That don't mean that they think
the horrific thing is funny,

that's a defense mechanism because
they don't wanna face

the sadness, so they try to
revert that into a joke

or try to revert that into
being funny.

Just like cops do it
all the time,

when somebody gets killed or
something like that,

sometimes we joke about their
bodies and stuff like that.

And it's not because we really
think it's funny,

it's because it's the brain's
mechanism

of diverting the trauma and saying,
"Ah, that's funny."

But at night it ain't
funny to you.

At night it's horrifying.

At night you're waking up
with nightmares.

But sometimes people have
a defense mechanism.

And then there's the avoidance
mechanism,

which means that I don't want
this to be true

because then this makes me vulnerable
and I am a threat

and I can easily lose my life
like Charlie lost his life.

So instead of me accepting the
fact that any little weirdo

with no life, no value can
find a way to kill me

and I'm a juggernaut, I don't
want that to be true.

So what makes me more comfortable
is if there's a conspiracy

that all of these parts
have to happen

before that ever can
happen to me.

So I'm safe and secure because
I'm not a part

of all of these dots that
have to be connected

in order for me to
lose my life.

Over here is I can lose my life
any day, anywhere,

anytime by anybody, no matter
what the value system

of that person is or not
the value they hold

versus I'm safe because I'm
doing the right thing

and I'm protected and you got
to be a part of XYZ

to end up getting in yourself
in a situation.

So those are theoretically positions
that I think people take

and why they take them.

Some people are just malicious,
they're tactical.

They know where to get clicks
and subscribers.

They know where to go viral.

So they strategically put
things in place

where they find ways
to go viral.

And there's people that do
it intentionally,

people that do it
inadvertently.

So there's a myriad of
different reasons

and I can't pretend to get in
somebody's brain and say,

this is the reason a
person does it.

There are times where people
do things in good faith

but it's viewed upon
in poor faith

because of the timing of
what they're doing.

A person can genuinely believe
that this shooting

has a conspiratorial aspect
to it, genuinely.

But when they put it out
at the wrong time,

it looks off, it's off-putting.

They put it out at the right time,
it's genuinely received.

Now people who are dumb, they
gonna follow whoever

they wanna follow and say everything
somebody do is right.

I could be wrong, there are
people that say I'm right

when I'm wrong and I know I'm wrong,
they'll say I'm right.

There's people that will argue
with me that I'm right

when I know that I'm wrong.

Officer Tatum, it was great
meeting you at the UFC.

I appreciate you coming over
to talk to my brother.

Hope you too can collab
soon, yeah.

Oh yeah, good meeting
you too, man.

Yep, we should do that.

Hopefully, yeah, I think
I gave my number.

I respect you and your man
and I understand

you don't want to burn
that friendship

but soon you will have
no choice

and you'll have to
call him out.

Before I ever get to
that point,

sorry Nick, I'm sorry bro.

I'm gonna get you some help
in here, all right?

And then you don't have to worry
about it being so long.

But the difference between,
and this is just me,

because my loyalty is there.

I would never call Charlie
out in public.

If anything, I would say Charlie,
let's have a discussion.

Let me come on your show, let's
discuss our differences.

Or I'll call Charlie
on the phone.

I would never blast Charlie in
public, I just won't do it.

Even when we disagree or agree.

Same thing with Candace.

If I really thought it
was necessary

to confront Candace about
something,

me and Candace would just have
a conversation about it.

And we could do a public
conversation

before you find me publicly
excoriating her

and blasting her for clickbait.

I know people want to
see the clicks.

If I came out right now
and I said,

I'm going all in, stay tuned,
I got receipts.

I have five million people
watching that video.

And I'll make a lot of money
from that video.

Five million people, you
want me to tell you

how much we'll make with five
million people watching it?

How much will we make, Nick,
on one video?

Five million people.

20,000?

25.

About 25,000 on one video.

If I had five million people
watching my video.

Put an advertising on there,
there'd be more than that.

It'll be, I'd be making $50,000
on one video.

But my loyalty, my friendship,

and my dedication to being
loyal to my word,

it means more than a
$50,000 check,

just to capitulate and make people
excited about drama.

I could drip, drip, drip,
drip, drip receipts

and drip, drip this and stay
tuned, look at this.

And I could feud with Candace
back and forth

on social media and some people
would love to see that.

But that's counterproductive
to my friendship

and my relationship with
my friend,

somebody who had my back from
the very beginning.

And I think you guys should
be able to see

that we don't agree, but to get
a video of me bashing

my friend is not gonna happen.

And that's because I may disagree
with what a person say,

that doesn't mean I don't
love the person,

because I know the person.

And when me and her first started,
we were nobodies.

Nobody knew our name, nobody
followed us,

we weren't making no money, we
weren't doing nothing.

It was red pill black and
officer Tatum.

And we had our first meeting
at a restaurant.

I ain't never met her before,
we met up at a restaurant,

we see if we could collab.

You know, I could tell the story
about the whole thing,

it was a great experience.

And every time she got
an opportunity,

she made sure I had an
opportunity.

And every time I had
an opportunity,

I made sure my sister had
an opportunity.

And every time somebody
came after me,

she always had my back.

And so to me, that's off
limits to me.

If I wanna yell and scream it,
I just called on the phone,

I got a phone number right here,
I texted last night.

If I wanna yell and scream,
I yell and scream it.

But I don't want that in
the public sphere

of me and my sister, because
what happens

when we begin to agree on it?

And now publicly we hated
each other,

and people ran with that, and
then now we talking

and we agree, because we talked
to each other.

But now we got on the internet
that we had all this beef.

Now if me and Kenneth want
to make some money,

we could do it, we'll do it
all the entertainment

for you guys, we'll go on her show
and we'll have a debate.

And it'll be 600,000 people
watching live.

That'd be a $100,000,
$200,000 check.

But I don't want no money.

I don't want friendship,
loyalty,

and you being old enough and
wise enough to know

that this too will pass
at some point.

Some bridges you just
don't burn.

Sometimes you don't give
the pleasure

of putting air in your family's
dirty work out in the public.

And maybe I'm wrong for this,
maybe people may think

I'm wrong for this, but that's
just how I roll.

One person, can y'all give
me one person

that I'm not gonna
do that with?

I'll crash out on every one
of y'all favorites.