Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Well, it's going to be a heck of a Tuesday for us, guys.
Where should we begin?
I'll tell you this.
Something is not right.
Something is not right.
And I am going to need you, whoever it is
that's listening to this podcast right now,
to wake up.
Because I am telling you this is
not a battle between left and right.
We all thought that at some point.
We believed that.
You're my enemy.
You're my enemy.
It is not a battle between Russia, Ukraine.
I don't care what your political issue of the day is.
What is happening right now in the world and
what just happened to my friend Charlie Kirk
is a battle of sheer evil versus goodness.
What do I have for you guys today?
Okay, well, first and foremost, the
indictment against Tyler Robinson was just released.
And I have a lot of questions that I think
need to be answered regarding his trans boyfriend,
Lance Twiggs.
I just spoke to a family member who told me
a lot about Lance Twiggs because the media
is kind of presenting him as this do-gooder.
You might be interested to know that
his family has a different perspective.
Also turning point employees are contacting me, a lot of them.
And I am not liking what I am hearing from
them about things that took place leading
up to that Hamptons event, some changes at
the organization in the months leading up
to that event and what had been happening
more broadly at the company over the last
year.
Speaking of which, Bill Ackman, you may have caught that he
responded to me about the Hamptons
with a lot of words to really say nothing at all.
And I want to be clear, I am not done, okay?
I'm coming for everybody.
Charlie Kirk's death is really just a beginning.
So welcome back.
Let's start with some major
updates regarding the Charlie Kirk case.
First and foremost, what always stood out to
us about this shooting was decoy boy, right?
We're all on social media.
We all watch the news.
We have all, whether we wanted to or not,
witnessed thanks to social media and the news
a lot of shootings, a lot of shootings,
whether it's gang related or otherwise.
And I have to say, I don't know if I'm the
only one, never in my entire life have I seen
a situation when a shooting happens and then somebody
completely unrelated to the shooting
that just happened jumps up and down and
says that they did it and gets arrested for
saying that they did it, implying that they did it.
Well, for whatever reason, George Zinn, who
is a 71-year-old man, was moved to do that,
right, instantly.
Charlie Kirk gets shot.
Suddenly the 71-year-old man jumps up and creates what is
obviously some sort of a distraction,
okay?
We have eyes.
That's not normal.
He creates a distraction.
So let's just take a look at this clip of
him being arrested in the aftermath of the
shooting.
Well, now it's about to get even stranger
because since he's been arrested, he's now
facing charges of obstruction of
justice because he didn't do it, right?
Why would you do that?
Why would you obstruct justice in this manner?
And now in addition to those charges, we learn that he's been
harboring images of child abuse,
okay?
He has kiddie porn.
This is the headline.
I can't make this up.
Man arrested for allegedly faking confession
to Charlie Kirk's killing, George Zinn, accused
of obstructing justice, was also booked in connection with
images on his cell phone related
to child abuse, okay?
So we learn from this article that after
being arrested, the 71-year-old man for this
second degree felony, which is obstruction
of justice, he was also when the police had
approached him, he was being weird
about giving them his cell phone, okay?
So they took him into custody.
They treated him for a medical condition.
And then they start asking this guy
questions about, you know, "What are you doing?
Can we see your cell phone?"
And he's being really cagey about giving over his cell phone.
They're like, "Okay, we're trying to get
to the bottom of why you would stand up and
scream shoot me, shoot me, immediately
following the aftermath of this murder, okay?"
And what they discover is that when asked by
an officer, okay, after he, like they figure
out that like he's not being
cooperative, is that he has images.
He has images of kiddie porn.
There's another way to say this,
related to child abuse on his cell phone.
Now what does that tell you about this guy, okay?
What does that tell you about George Zinn?
What that signals to me about George Zinn
is that I've, I mean, I've read a lot about
Jeffrey Epstein.
I've read a lot about blackmail operations.
The people they tend to go after are
people who are into children, full stop.
Now I'm not saying, obviously, he's just been charged here.
I guess we have to say allegedly, but that's
what's coming out now, that they found images
on his cell phone.
So this guy who is into this sort of thing,
we also figure out that in the past he has
given interviews related to September 11th and Al Qaeda.
He is in Utah and he is obstructing justice.
And he also happens to have this totally
disgusting addiction of some description.
I'm assuming it's an addiction and that's what he's harboring.
He's harboring child abuse images on his phone.
That's what I'm going to tell you.
That's my instinct immediately.
I don't like this guy.
That is suspect, okay?
Something to watch.
Now in terms of this indictment, now that
we can formally read the indictment, there's
been a lot that's been said that I think a lot of the
miscommunication is perhaps coming
from Governor Cox.
I think he in and of himself, I
probably should look into Governor Cox.
I'm not sure why he said some
things that are apparently untrue.
Maybe he misspoke.
I understand there is a lot of
pressure when it comes to this investigation.
But let's just take us through this indictment.
I think it's important for us to go through
it so that we can see the setup here of what
took place on September 10th.
Now first, they provide
basically an overview in this indictment.
It's a probable cause statement.
They tell us that basically after 33
hours, they really love saying 33 hours.
I don't know why they keep signaling that to us.
On September 11, 2025, when Tyler James
Robinson surrendered to police at Washington County
Sheriff's office, that was when it happened.
They found DNA consistent with Robinson on the rifle trigger.
After shooting Mr. Kirk, Robinson hid the gun.
They're going to get into that.
They ordered the clothing that he was wearing
when he fired the rifle and he told his lover
slash roommate to delete incriminating
text messages and not to speak with police.
And also they will be charging him count
six because children were present at the time
of the shooting.
Okay.
Now to get through this, we are told that
the suspect after this shooting took place
that there was a police officer who
immediately looked upward and realized he had heard the
sign of a rifle, knew that it was
obviously coming from the rooftops.
They then began crawling through the
footage, began crawling through the footage to see
what had happened.
They tell us that this discovery led to an intensive review.
Let me go actually back up to this paragraph.
Police reviewed surveillance from the
camera that was covering the roof and discovered
that it recorded an individual that was dressed in dark
clothing who had crossed the railing
from the public walkway and dropped
onto the roof at approximately 12, 15 PM.
Now just very quickly, I'm going to just
tell you according to our timeline, we know that
Charlie gets shot at 12, 23 PM.
So they're now telling us that he
was on that roof since 12, 15 PM.
So he's setting up that shot, we
can assume for about eight minutes.
Okay.
It goes on, "Although the individual moved
out of the camera's view for a short time,
the camera again captured the individual running across the
roof and then low crawling to the
area that the officer had recognized as where the suspected
sniper had dropped into a prone
shooting position.
After a short time, which matches the known
time of the shot, the individual arose and
then ran across the roof to the northeast."
So nothing in here implies that he had taken apart the shotgun.
I mean, that just seems to be now
removed from the narrative altogether.
It goes on to read that, "This discovery
led to an intensive review of UVU surveillance
recordings to attempt to track and identify the suspect.
Surveillance revealed the following that at
approximately 11, 51 AM, the suspect had entered
campus from the north.
He is wearing a black shirt with an American flag in its
center, a dark baseball cap, large
sunglasses.
Throughout the surveillance, the suspect keeps his head down
and rarely raises his head enough
to get a clear image of his face.
As he proceeds across the campus, he
is seen walking with an unusual gait.
The suspect walks with very little bending
in his right leg, consistent with a rifle
being hidden in his pants.
This unusual gait continues until the
suspect is seen crossing the railing off the open
walkway and onto the roof where he leaves the camera's view."
Okay, so the first thing I'm going to say
is they've only sent us screenshots, right?
We've only seen a picture of him coming up the staircase.
It looked to me like both his legs were bending.
I don't see why they don't just release.
Why don't they just release this fully so
we can make sure that this is the same person
that we see walking across with a limp, right?
That footage, which was provided by TMZ.
Also you will notice that nowhere in this
indictment as we go on are they going to mention
which Governor Cox spoke about.
Like first he came in a different outfit.
Remember Governor Cox said he was
wearing the light shorts and marooned shirts.
The implication here being that maybe he
came to come scout things, to check things out.
At first this is him, but then
he comes back in the black outfit.
This is missing from the indictment and I'm wondering why.
What is the explanation for that?
That would be a part of it if you were scouting the shooting.
Now they're just like, "Let's jump into the
guy that is wearing black and we're not going
to give you footage.
We're going to tell you that this is him and
you can assume that he slowly walked up this
staircase and was obscuring his face from view."
Okay, then it tells us that a camera later
captures the suspect as he runs across the
roof.
It gets into the shooting position and then
immediately after the shot was fired, we know
that he runs across carrying an item
whose shape is consistent with a rifle.
The suspect is then seen climbing down the roof.
He appears to drop the item that he was
carrying as he hits the ground in a controlled fall.
He then picks up the item and runs
toward the northeast end of the campus.
It tells us that's how they then
expand their crime scene investigation.
They followed his escape path to the northeast end of the
campus where they believe the suspect
left campus and entered a wooded area.
In that wooded area, investigators found
a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel.
So again, there was no disassembly.
It's wrapped in a towel.
Presumably that's how he covered it while he was running.
The rifle contained one spent round and three unspent rounds.
This is consistent with the facts officers
observed at the time of and immediately after
the shooting.
No shell casings that were found on the roof suggesting a
bolt-action rather than an auto-loading
weapon and only a single round was fired.
Then they tell us what was actually inscribed.
These are essentially memes.
"Hey fascist, catch!" says one on one cartridge.
You've got "Notices bulge."
What's this on another cartridge?
"Oh Bella Chow, Bella Chow, Bella Chow, Chow Chow."
On the third cartridge and on the fourth
cartridge it reads, "If you read this, you
are gay, LMAO."
Okay, they detailed that.
The rifle, the ammunition rounds and the
towel were then sent for forensic processing and
that the DNA was consistent with Robinson
that was found on the trigger and other parts
of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing and
two of the three unfired cartridges and the
towel.
Okay, they were able to immediately locate the shooter.
They were unable, pardon me, to immediately
locate the shooter so that's when they published
the photos of the shooter from their
surveillance and they asked for the public's help.
Now we're going to get a little bit
more of a narrative change, right?
They tell us that as they continued their
investigation on September 11th, Tyler James
Robinson then walked in to the Washington
County Sheriff's Office and he is accompanied
by his parents and a family friend to turn himself in, okay?
Now again, he didn't confess yet
but he's here to turn himself in.
Robinson's mother stated the following to
police that on September 11th, the day after
the shooting, she saw the photo of the shooter in the news and
thought that the shooter looked
like her son.
She then called her son and asked him where he was.
He said he was at homesick and that he had
also been homesick on yesterday, September
10th, when the shooting occurred.
Robinson's mother expressed concern to her
husband that the suspected shooter looked
like Robinson.
So she's calling her husband and she's
going, "Hey, this kind of looks like our son."
And then his father agrees that that looks like their son.
So Robinson's mother explained to the
officers that over the last year or so, Robinson had
become increasingly more political.
He had started to lean more left.
He was becoming more pro-gay and more trans-right oriented,
that Robinson began to date his
roommate which is a biological
male who was transitioning genders.
We're going to get to him in a second.
This resulted in several discussions with
family members but especially between Robinson
and his father who have very difficult,
different, pardon me, political views.
In one conversation before the shooting, Robinson mentioned
that Charlie Kirk would be holding
this event at UVU which Robinson
said was a stupid venue for the event.
Robinson accused Kirk of spreading hate.
Robinson's father reported that when his wife showed him that
surveillance image of a suspected
shooter in the news, he agreed that it looked like their son.
He also believed that the rifle that the
police had suspected the shooter had used matched
a rifle that was given to his son as a
gift and as a result, he then contacts his son
and asks him to send a photo of
the rifle that was gifted to him.
Robinson did not respond to that.
However, Robinson's father spoke on the
phone with Tyler at that moment and Tyler implied
that he planned to take his own life.
Now his parents were then able to convince
him to meet at their home, not to do that.
And as they discussed the situation,
Robinson implied, implied is the word they use here,
that he was the shooter and stated that he
could not go to jail and that he just wanted
to end things.
When asked why he did it, Robinson
explained that there was too much evil and that this
guy Charlie Kirk spreads too much hate.
They talked about Robinson turning himself in and they
convinced Robinson to speak with
the family friend who happens to be a retired deputy sheriff.
And at Robinson's father's request, the
family friend met with Robinson and his parents and
they convinced Robinson to turn himself in.
Okay.
Again, he did not confess, but he turned himself in.
And they then detail that they tell him, "Hey,
look, also bring in any clothes that you used
because you don't want the police to then
have to search the property of your parents.
So anything that you used, you need to bring over."
Okay.
That doesn't exactly make sense because
Robinson is living with his trans boyfriend, but that
is apparently Robinson replies that at
that moment that he had disposed of clothes in
different area.
So they're looking into that.
Okay.
Now we're getting to the roommate portion,
which is very interesting to me and I will
tell you why.
It's interesting to me because I
obviously have had a lot of tips.
I've had a lot of conversations with
people that knew both of these individuals.
When I say both, I'm referring to Tyler Robinson who was being
indicted, but also his boyfriend
who has not been indicted.
And the conversation that I am having is that Tyler's
classmates and the neighborhood are
very shocked that Tyler would be first
and foremost involved in this at all.
So right away they told me, "No way.
This guy is wearing the same outfit
from 33 hours ago because he was very tidy.
He sort of kept to himself, but he worked
with his hands and he was kind of a good person."
There were no signs here.
Like this appears to them to be like this
is a very good family and that there were
certain narratives out there that didn't make sense to them.
They could not compute them as it pertained to Tyler Robinson.
Okay.
And they're saying there's no way if like
they're not saying he couldn't have been
involved.
I very much want to be clear.
I believe that Tyler Robinson was involved
on the basis of this evidence, but rather
that there's no way he could have acted alone.
That this had to be a part of some wider plot.
Okay.
And when I'm speaking to people that are close to this
situation, what they are shocked about
is the fact that only Tyler could have been
arrested because it's a different perspective
when it comes to Tyler's trans boyfriend.
Okay.
Tyler's trans boyfriend's name is Lance Twiggs.
And they are very shocked.
In fact, the people that are intimately involved in the
situation are saying, "We thought he
was definitely going to get charged because
apparently," and again, I'm going to say this
allegedly, "he had been arrested or taken in on the same day."
Now the media narrative is that
that guy was being really cooperative.
He had nothing to do with anything.
Okay.
We're going to go through that.
And again, I'm going to tell you what his family is saying.
I'm referring now to Lance Twiggs.
Let's get to what the indictment tells us about him.
Police interviewed Robinson's roommate, a
biological male who was involved in a romantic
relationship with Robinson.
The roommate told police that he had received messages from
Tyler Robinson about the shooting
and he provided those messages to police.
And then it goes on describing those messages.
On September 10, 2025, oh wait,
they're not telling us the time.
I don't like that.
I hope that's just you forgot, but I need to
know exactly when you're saying these messages
were sent, okay?
Because I need to fit them into my timeline, okay?
Clearly on the basis of what I'm about to
read, these messages had to have gone out
after Charlie Kirk was shot, if I'm using my
context clues, my blues clues to put things
together, but they're not clear here.
They just say on September 10, 2025, no time given, the
roommate received a text message
from Robinson which said, "Drop what
you are doing and look under my keyboard."
The roommate, Lance, then looks under his
keyboard and he finds a note that states,
"I had the opportunity to take out
Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it."
The structure that is weird.
"I had the opportunity to take out
Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it."
Okay, that's just structurally,
that's not proper English, okay?
It's either "I have," okay, or "I had."
Past tense, again, not clear.
Police found a photograph of this note and
the following text exchange then took place.
After reading that note, the
roommate texts Tyler and he says, "What?
You're joking, right?"
Robinson writes, "I'm still okay, my love,
but I am stuck in a ram for a little while
longer yet.
Shouldn't be long until I can come
home, but I got to grab my rifle still.
To be honest, I had hoped to keep
this secret till I died of old age.
I am sorry to involve you."
The roommate replies, "You weren't the one who did it, right?"
Robinson replies, "I am.
I'm sorry."
The roommate replies, "I thought they caught the person."
Robinson replies, "No, they grabbed some crazy old dude that
interrogated someone in similar
clothing.
I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop
point shortly after, but most of that side
of town got locked down.
It's quiet, almost enough to get out,
but there's one vehicle still lingering."
The roommate says, "Why?"
Robinson says, "Why did I do it?"
Roommate says, "Yeah."
Robinson says, "I had enough of his hatred.
Some hate can't be negotiated out.
If I am able to grab my rifle
unseen, I will have left no evidence.
Going to attempt to retrieve it
again, hopefully they have moved on.
I haven't seen anything about them finding it."
Roommate says, "How long have you been planning this?"
Robinson says, "A bit over a week, I believe.
I can get close to it," referring to the
rifle, "but there is a squad car parked right by
it.
I think they already swept that
spot, but I don't want to chance it."
Robinson says, "I'm wishing I had circled
back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my
vehicle.
I'm worried what my old man would do
if I didn't bring back grandpa's rifle.
I don't know if it had a serial
number, but it wouldn't trace to me.
I worry about prints.
I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits.
Didn't have the ability or time to bring it with.
I might have to abandon it and
hopefully they don't find prints.
How the eff will I explain losing it to my old man?
Anything I left was the rifle wrapped in a towel."
What?
You're worried about explaining
losing the rifle to your father.
Not worried that you left the rifle and therefore it's
obviously going to be found out.
The only thing that you left was the murder weapon?
This is weird.
This chain is weird to me.
It's weird to me that we don't know what time.
I don't know what he means.
Where is he stuck here, guys?
Do you have a clue here?
I'm stuck in a room for a little while longer.
It shouldn't be long until I can come home.
Is it a typo?
I should have asked you guys.
That's the town?
Okay.
Okay.
That's the town.
I'm stuck here for a little while longer.
It shouldn't be long until I can come
home, but I got to grab my rifle still.
So is this happening during lockdown?
He tells him to check under and to see.
Oh, check under quickly and see.
And I took care of it and he's where.
And now he's giving him an accounting of
exactly what's taking place, which means if
this is right after and they're still in lockdown, he's what?
Monitoring the situation?
Because this is going to give us a timeline, whether they tell
us when these messages happened
or not.
The fact that he already knows that they grabbed some crazy old
dude and that they also interrogated
someone in similar clothing, we're going to
be able to go back and plot exactly when that
happened or at least when the public was
informed because this whole correspondence
is very strange to me.
It's very strange to me.
He then is even more explicit, talk about
trying to cover your tracks, but then explicitly
texting everything to your lover.
He says, "The only thing I left
was the rifle wrapped in a towel.
Remember how I was engraving bullets?
The effing messages are mostly a meme.
If I see notices bulge on Fox News, I might have a stroke."
All right, I'm going to have to leave it.
That really effing sucks.
Okay, so if this is our guy, oh, we're not done.
Let's finish.
Finish.
That really sucks.
He's got to leave it.
And then he says, "Judging from today,
I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine.
I think that was a $2,000 scope."
And then he does a winky face.
And then he tells him, "Delete this exchange."
And then Robinson says, "My dad wants photos of the rifle."
He says, "Grandpa wants to know who has what.
The feds released a photo of the rifle and it is very unique.
He's calling me right now, not answering.
His dad's calling him.
Okay, well, the dad, this is interesting.
When is this text chain taking place?
Because we just heard that the
dad, they figured it out the next day.
They're making it sound like this all happened back to back.
Is this happening over two days?
Why not tell us this instantly
so I can work it into my timeline?
Okay, are these messages day one?
And then what?
They had no correspondence at all until he
jumps right back in and says, "My dad's calling
me.
Where were you when your dad called you?
You guys live together.
Why are you texting at all?
Why didn't this kid immediately call?
If they're in lockdown and he needs to go
back and get his rifle, right, this kid could
have," and I'm speaking about Lance,
"could have contacted immediately and said, "I'm
getting a confession right now."
I don't like that we are not being told the
exact timestamp of these messages because,
you know, my timeline demands it."
To close loop on how this enters, again,
not knowing when this happened, Robinson says,
"My dad wants photos of the rifle."
He says, "Grandpa wants to know who has what.
The Feds released a photo and it's very unique.
He's calling me right now, not answering."
Robinson says, "Well, since Trump got into
office, my dad has been pretty diehard magga."
Robinson says, "I'm going to turn myself in willingly.
One of my neighbors is here.
He is a deputy for the sheriff."
Robinson says, "You are all I worry about, love.
I'm much more worried."
The roommate says, Lance says,
"I'm much more worried about you."
Robinson says, "Don't talk to the media, please.
Don't take any interviews or make any comments.
If any police ask you questions,
ask for a lawyer and stay silent."
How are you guys feeling about that?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Mark is going to jump on and say something.
Go ahead, Mark.
Yeah, he's the guy that's always in my ear.
Not always.
I just noticed that around some of these
exchanges, there's ellipses above them.
You want to break it up a little bit?
What did you say?
Around some of these exchanges, there's ellipses.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.