Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[Music]
okay
socialism round three by cracky this has
been a long time coming okay so we left
it with social democracy and we now pick
up the baton in 1994 perhaps yeah 1994
when we had two things happen first of
all we had Bill Clinton elected in the
United States and we also had Tony Blair
take control of the Labor Party in the
United Kingdom and between the two of
them was defined the third way now in
order to understand the the third way we
need to go back we need to go back we
need to look at social democracy we need
to look at what such did with her
neoliberalism and have that infused the
third way it will help tremendously if
you've looked at my previous videos on
parties in the UK where I go through all
of these and I will link off to that in
the footnotes if I remember shouldn't
forget that okay so social democracy we
start with a fairly simple situation we
have got the rich the well-off and the
poor and obviously that is not a healthy
position for the society so keen says
well in order to make this better what
we need to do we need to sort out well
pretty much everything we've got this
big problem the poor are starving and we
have this huge level of social
inequality that's not good for business
so what we're going to do my business I
mean society and actually the economy so
what Keynes does he says we're going to
take a lot from you and we're going to
take a bit from you and we're going to
give it or at least some of it to you
and at the same time we're not just
going to give you a handout world
to make various social reform we're
gonna make various economic reforms and
that's pretty much it
well okay that's worked until about 1979
when everything changed this has been
neoliberal theory took over and we start
from the same premise we've got the wife
we've got the well-off forgot the poor
but then we change things you look this
is not really a very effective way of
managing societies a lot of work for
government trying to reorganize this
trying to take money from you and give
it to you and how much is the right
amount and what happens when we give it
to you and you know by the time we give
it to you then that changes we've got to
do something else and this is not
working so let's try something else
and the neoliberal theory was very very
simple it's about what we need here is a
growing economy if we've got economic
growth then we're creating a position
whereby of so people can sort themselves
out so if we have growth you can go for
the time being then we take our poor and
the economy's grown so they are no
longer as poor as they were and the
well-off their world their even better
off and the wealthier well they're
wealthier still now within this we have
got rising income inequality but we're
genuinely not worried about that what
we're impressed by is the fact that
these guys have gone from there to there
and these guys have gone from here to
here and these guys have gone from it is
they're sorting themselves out so all is
well
according to neoliberal theory if people
are sorting themselves out then they're
going to be maximizing their utility in
in the economy the economy is going to
be great they're gonna be making
reasonable choices about what they want
to do and if they're all good little
capitalists out there then our society
is gonna be formed of good little
capitalists and it's going to be
homogeneous and they're all going to be
working together we're going to have a
sort of atomistic empathy so everyone's
good little capitalists were all the
same and everything's great except
everything is not great Blair came in in
1994 he ultimately won power in 1997 and
he said look we have gold growth okay we
accept that these guys are doing better
off and these guys are better off and
these guys are fabulously better off but
look at this
these guys are still
below the bread line that means that
they're not really capitalist they
haven't got any capital we need to get
these very very cool people off the
bottom of the well they'll still be on
the bottom of the ladder but we can't
have them below the poverty line because
if they're below the poverty line then
they're really not in a position to
benefit from capitalism new labor
economic theory says look capitalism is
a good thing and we need to get
everybody on board so rather than saying
look everyone's better off of rising
tide lifts all boats we can do better
than that says new labour and what we're
going to do is we're going to take the
port and we're gonna lift them out of
absolute poverty we have to somehow get
these guns across the bread line thus
and that is exactly what Blair did and
that meant that these characters the
poor along with everybody else was now
enjoying a meaningful participation in a
capitalist society capitalism being a
good thing in this doctrine that
everybody is working really really hard
everybody is everybody is now in a
position to make meaningful choices
about what they want to do so at this
point you're probably saying we'll hang
on a second that just sounds like fat
tourism or neoliberalism and to a
certain extent you're right look we're
not concerned about relative income
we're not concerned about reducing the
income gap what we're interested in is
just creating people who can benefit
from society here so there's a
difference there between capitalism and
between the Thatcherism and Blair ISM or
between new and new labor the third way
sorry and neoliberalism but it wasn't
just that again this benefits a lot if
you have if you have an understanding of
Thatcherism and neil neoliberalism but
let's put it this way okay neoliberalism
is all about going for growth we have
economic neoliberalism we are embracing
these packages here that are there to
deliver growth and we're looking to
create a capitalist society so we have a
stability through common aspirations and
common values if everybody's a
capitalist then everybody is on the same
page
we have social stability as well as
economic stability and of course if
we've got growth and everyone's doing
better and the society should be getting
stronger just as the economy gets
stronger now that's all well and good
but for Blair he had two problems first
of all he had to differentiate himself
from Thatcherism and he had to deal with
those people who were excluded from
society
oh sorry excluded from capitalist
society and so he came up with two
principle ideas the first was social
justice now it says social justice on
the tip but in reality it's more package
of economic reforms these were designed
to lift the very very poor out of
poverty now we're not looking at
redistribution here we're not saying
look hey I have some money so now you're
not so poor the point was about making
capitalism work for them making work
accessible and work viable so in other
words if you were prevented from getting
a job not because you didn't want a job
but because getting a job would have
meant you couldn't afford to pay your
family or child care or whatever it be
so feed your family or child care then
this is what they were seeking to do and
we have a series of packages the three
that you really need to know about sure
start tax credit and minimum wage these
are not about giving you handouts
they're about and allowing you to get on
to the carousel get on to the big party
wagon that is capitalism so you can
start making meaningful life choices we
are here looking at a wholesale
rejection of social democracy we're not
looking at the government as a
reallocating mechanism of taking from
the rich and giving to the poor here
we're trying to make sure that everybody
is rich this is a hand up not a handout
so this is not welfare as understood by
your Social Democrats rather it's a way
of dismantling institutional barriers
that prevent the very very poor from
benefiting from capitalism so here's a
big departure not just from social
democracy although it is but also from
neoliberalism pure hardcore
neoliberalism you know you're saying
that there are social certain
institutional barriers that prevent the
very very poor from accessing capitalism
let's sort those out we're not just
giving them money we're allowing them to
get a job because that of course will
mean that they are now part of our big
capitalist society and then in addition
to that where that
and the neoliberals neo-cons sorry had
sought to achieve a more homogeneous
society in the case of neoliberalism we
sought to so in the case of new labor it
was more an argument along the lines of
pluralism and diversity if everybody's
different then everybody's the same so
we can achieve social unity through the
mechanism of multiculturalism and here
we had the proliferation of faith
schools when there appeared force 28
civil partnerships and lots of stuff
that was designed to encourage pluralism
and diversity were much more remember
that it was it was Blair who allowed
unlimited entry unlimited migration from
the European Union so you know he's very
much case of inclusion of pluralism and
diversity and that again was a
differentiation from Thatcher so we have
economic differentiation and societal
differentiation but again at the same
time we have a degree of continuity we
have growth we have capitalism but we
add to that pluralism and diversity and
social justice and in so doing blair was
able to correct what he perceived to be
the problems with Thatcherism while
simultaneously establishing some sort of
differentiation between himself and
capitalism to placate the more
intransigent left-wing elements of the
labor party who obviously made their
presence felt throughout the rest of his
administration so what does that mean
for you in terms of the third way we
accept that the market is more efficient
than the state in terms of economics and
services in terms of generating growth
and indeed of delivering services like
schools and hospitals and so on this is
where Blair came in with PFI and vastly
expanded the provision of private
services the state changed subtly I'll
explain that in a second the idea that
the government can't engineer improved
outcomes what it can do is create the
environment in which the individual can
improve themselves
we embrace capitalism a rising tide
lifts all boats and the government's
role becomes about ensuring access to
capital is I'm not trying to mitigate
capitis I'm not trying to take the edges
of capitalism but rather to ensure that
everybody can join the party
so not just sort of turning the music
down and so
come on lose every was something you're
having too much fun and they're not
having enough fun it's like come on
everybody have fun and those who were
locked out are encouraged to come and
join the party in terms of service
provision we're looking at the
government being a guarantor of service
and a broker of services rather
necessarily than the provider of the
services that themselves and we see that
in the building of hospitals and schools
and those them being leased back to the
states and Lea academies and all of that
sort of stuff so we're seeing service
provision being taken missus safe rum
the sole provision of the state and
we're getting the private sector
involved instead we're using capitalism
as a homogenizing force but all team
also multiculturalism the idea that
where everyone's different then we're
all the same and again I think I
mentioned earlier that I wrote an
article in politics review where we look
at and when we look at nationalism in
the state and I talked a little bit
about Indonesia and the way in which
Indonesia adopted multiculturalism
almost counter-intuitively
as a homogenizing force panca sylia it's
called unity through diversity or
anything gobber's belong like bajas is
very rustic the Americans did it as well
with explore and pluribus unum so what
we're looking at there is that now in
terms of equality yes we're looking at
moral value we're looking at equality of
opportunity but what we're really
looking at here is Universal choice that
everybody should have a choice and we're
using choice as a way of improving
services I'm running out of time I
didn't expect to spend quite so much
time on this we're looking at reform
systems with the individual forget
empathy embrace selfishness that is the
neoliberal mantra we're seeing a schism
there as we move from one form of
socialism to the next the third way it
really doesn't have anything in common
with social democracy at all again we're
looking at a revised version of the
state the state is not there to provide
but rather to guarantee that the citizen
can access what they want in the market
they are a guarantor of services they
ensure fair play and equal access again
everybody should be able to access the
benefits of capitalism in terms of
social organization we recognize that
society is a collection of autonomous
individuals but we recognize also
that it's about including everybody in
that big picture it doesn't matter what
you are you could be gay and be straight
you can be he'll be LGBTQ or X musical
you know what I mean
it doesn't matter we're not excluding
anybody from that particular party and
the same along race the same long
religions it's all about inclusion and
through diversity we achieve unity the
economy it's all about capitalism a
rising tide lifts all boats but again
the key issue there is that the
government's role is to ensure that all
have access to the benefits of
capitalism good I'm sure you'll be able
to go back think about this pulls in and
have a good look at it the other thing
is you don't have to worry about prep
because you know in my class I've done
it for you I'm gonna sign off at this
point I'm going to put up the notes on
the thinker's I hope you've enjoyed
these videos I hope they're helpful if
they're not let me know how I can make
them more helpful and if you did find
them helpful the Marines please tell
your friends remember that I can do
these things for you I can also do
online tutorials if that's the sort of
thing in which you're interested in just
drop me a line but most of all use these
videos I hope they are helpful they're
designed to be so and good luck in your
exams see you on soon I hope next up
some videos on ecologist everybody loves
that don't absolutely see you
[Music]
[Music]
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.