Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:02,333 --> 00:00:03,833
- [Tony] Over 70% of
the Earth's surface
2
00:00:03,833 --> 00:00:07,542
is covered by water, yet so
much of it remains uncharted.
3
00:00:07,542 --> 00:00:09,458
What if the greatest
mysteries of the deep
4
00:00:09,458 --> 00:00:11,583
are still waiting
to be discovered?
5
00:00:12,792 --> 00:00:13,917
- [Onlooker] What
the [bleep] is that?
6
00:00:13,917 --> 00:00:15,417
Go, go, I don't
know what that is.
7
00:00:15,417 --> 00:00:16,792
- [Tony] From the
darkest trenches
8
00:00:16,792 --> 00:00:18,417
to the vast open waters,
9
00:00:18,417 --> 00:00:20,042
what is lurking
beneath the surface?
10
00:00:20,042 --> 00:00:22,083
- [Onlooker] Yeah, it's
really pushing forward now.
11
00:00:22,083 --> 00:00:23,458
- Now watch, its
head's gonna pop out.
12
00:00:23,458 --> 00:00:26,333
- [Tony] Is a mysterious
underwater forest
13
00:00:26,333 --> 00:00:29,208
stranding deep sea
fish in California?
14
00:00:30,417 --> 00:00:32,583
- Some UFO theorists talk
about Sycamore Knoll,
15
00:00:32,583 --> 00:00:33,792
that it might represent
16
00:00:33,792 --> 00:00:36,750
some type of
underwater alien base.
17
00:00:36,750 --> 00:00:40,333
- [Tony] Are dinosaurs still
present in the ocean's abyss?
18
00:00:40,333 --> 00:00:43,000
- Perhaps we're looking
at a prehistoric creature,
19
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:44,958
specifically a Mosasaur.
20
00:00:44,958 --> 00:00:46,042
- [Tony] And what's that
21
00:00:46,042 --> 00:00:48,375
disturbing the
waters of Loch Ness?
22
00:00:48,375 --> 00:00:50,708
Has the fabled monster
been caught on camera?
23
00:00:50,708 --> 00:00:53,958
- Some researchers have called
this the most significant
24
00:00:53,958 --> 00:00:57,333
Loch Ness footage in
the last 20 years.
25
00:00:57,333 --> 00:00:59,750
- [Tony] On this special episode
of the "Proof is Out There,
26
00:00:59,750 --> 00:01:01,375
Unexplained Edition,"
27
00:01:01,375 --> 00:01:03,958
our team of top experts
investigates evidence
28
00:01:03,958 --> 00:01:07,000
of mysterious
underwater creatures.
29
00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:08,167
- [Onlooker] What
on earth is that?
30
00:01:08,167 --> 00:01:09,542
- These remains
31
00:01:09,542 --> 00:01:11,875
aren't like anything
I've really seen before.
32
00:01:11,875 --> 00:01:13,583
- [Tony] Then, we'll
pass a verdict.
33
00:01:13,583 --> 00:01:15,875
- We were able to confirm the
authenticity of this video
34
00:01:15,875 --> 00:01:17,042
and it is genuine.
35
00:01:18,167 --> 00:01:19,875
- The Proof starts now.
36
00:01:19,875 --> 00:01:22,500
[upbeat music]
37
00:01:27,875 --> 00:01:30,625
Good evening and welcome to,
"The Proof is out There."
38
00:01:30,625 --> 00:01:34,375
We know the ocean is as
mysterious as it is deep,
39
00:01:34,375 --> 00:01:35,708
but what we don't know
40
00:01:35,708 --> 00:01:37,750
is why there's been a
spate of odd creatures
41
00:01:37,750 --> 00:01:42,250
from the depths washing up in
the same area in California.
42
00:01:42,250 --> 00:01:43,708
See if you can figure it out.
43
00:01:45,208 --> 00:01:48,542
It's 2021 in scenic
Crystal Cove, California,
44
00:01:48,542 --> 00:01:51,125
a seaside nature preserve
in Orange County.
45
00:01:51,125 --> 00:01:53,333
While out for a refreshing
surfside stroll,
46
00:01:53,333 --> 00:01:55,708
one beachcomber comes
across a carcass
47
00:01:55,708 --> 00:01:58,542
that looks like something
imagined by Jules Verne.
48
00:01:59,625 --> 00:02:02,292
The photo shows a
bizarre, huge round fish
49
00:02:02,292 --> 00:02:04,500
with a gaping tooth
mouth and an odd
50
00:02:04,500 --> 00:02:07,708
joystick like appendage
protruding from its body.
51
00:02:07,708 --> 00:02:10,458
It seems to lack eyes and fins
and its near black coloring
52
00:02:10,458 --> 00:02:14,542
only adds to its disturbing
phantasmagoric appearance.
53
00:02:14,542 --> 00:02:17,625
And this incident was not
a fluke, pun intended.
54
00:02:18,917 --> 00:02:23,083
- [Onlooker] Yeah, it's a
barracuda, it's a barracuda.
55
00:02:23,083 --> 00:02:25,292
- [Tony] No, a barracuda
looks like this.
56
00:02:26,208 --> 00:02:27,583
What we see here is another
57
00:02:27,583 --> 00:02:29,458
bizarre, out of
place sea creature
58
00:02:29,458 --> 00:02:31,167
that washed up in recent months.
59
00:02:32,083 --> 00:02:33,417
A few miles up the coast,
60
00:02:33,417 --> 00:02:36,417
a strange fish flailing
about on the beach.
61
00:02:36,417 --> 00:02:38,000
Are these creatures natural?
62
00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:39,458
And if they are,
63
00:02:39,458 --> 00:02:41,542
what accounts for their
appearance on these shores?
64
00:02:41,542 --> 00:02:44,500
- Some UFO theorists talk
about Sycamore Knoll,
65
00:02:44,500 --> 00:02:47,583
a strange anomalous
structure about 2000 feet
66
00:02:47,583 --> 00:02:50,292
under the water off the
coast of California.
67
00:02:50,292 --> 00:02:52,458
UFO enthusiasts have speculated
68
00:02:52,458 --> 00:02:56,417
that it might represent some
type of underwater alien base.
69
00:02:57,708 --> 00:02:59,208
- [Tony] The Sycamore
Knoll is three miles wide
70
00:02:59,208 --> 00:03:01,125
and 2000 feet
beneath the surface.
71
00:03:01,125 --> 00:03:03,750
That alien base theory
stems from its oval shape
72
00:03:03,750 --> 00:03:05,708
and perfectly flat surface.
73
00:03:05,708 --> 00:03:08,625
One theory is that the Sycamore
Knoll is emitting signals
74
00:03:08,625 --> 00:03:11,208
that are driving deep
sea fish to the surface.
75
00:03:12,208 --> 00:03:14,625
Another theory is that we are.
76
00:03:14,625 --> 00:03:17,542
- Another possibility
is that the US military,
77
00:03:17,542 --> 00:03:19,458
and other military
forces around the world
78
00:03:19,458 --> 00:03:23,875
deploy new types of sonar and
underwater experimentation
79
00:03:23,875 --> 00:03:26,833
driving these strange looking
creatures to the surface.
80
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:30,375
- Another note,
81
00:03:30,375 --> 00:03:33,542
22 miles off the coast
of Southern California
82
00:03:33,542 --> 00:03:37,083
lies Catalina Island, a place
where some of our own experts
83
00:03:37,083 --> 00:03:38,292
have recently been documenting
84
00:03:38,292 --> 00:03:40,875
anomalous activity in the skies.
85
00:03:40,875 --> 00:03:44,208
In other words, this
area is a noted hotbed
86
00:03:44,208 --> 00:03:46,167
for unexplained phenomenon.
87
00:03:46,167 --> 00:03:47,917
So what are these
strange creatures
88
00:03:47,917 --> 00:03:51,542
and why are they washing up
on shore with such frequency?
89
00:03:51,542 --> 00:03:52,917
Let's hear from the experts.
90
00:03:57,625 --> 00:04:02,042
- This is a football fish which
is related to angler fish.
91
00:04:02,042 --> 00:04:04,833
Football fish have this large
lure on top of their head
92
00:04:04,833 --> 00:04:06,833
to bring in prey to eat,
93
00:04:06,833 --> 00:04:07,958
but this is not an animal
94
00:04:07,958 --> 00:04:10,125
that we would expect to
see washed up on a beach
95
00:04:10,125 --> 00:04:12,667
because it is a very
deep sea animal.
96
00:04:14,042 --> 00:04:15,708
- [Tony] She also identifies
the long, skinny fish
97
00:04:15,708 --> 00:04:19,500
from the video, which is very
unusual to find on dry land.
98
00:04:19,500 --> 00:04:21,542
- This is the lancet fish
99
00:04:21,542 --> 00:04:24,708
and they're typically
very deep dwelling.
100
00:04:24,708 --> 00:04:27,833
A lot of benthic or abyssal
fish are built like this
101
00:04:27,833 --> 00:04:30,500
where they have
really striking fins
102
00:04:30,500 --> 00:04:33,375
that help them stay
upright in the water
103
00:04:33,375 --> 00:04:35,542
and they have these
long, sinuous bodies
104
00:04:35,542 --> 00:04:38,708
because they live under
a lot of pressure.
105
00:04:38,708 --> 00:04:41,208
- [Tony] By abyssal, she
means the zone of the ocean
106
00:04:41,208 --> 00:04:44,250
roughly 10,000 to 20,000
feet below the surface
107
00:04:44,250 --> 00:04:45,625
where no light reaches,
108
00:04:45,625 --> 00:04:47,583
resulting in perpetual darkness
109
00:04:47,583 --> 00:04:50,375
and an absence of oxygen
producing plant life.
110
00:04:50,375 --> 00:04:51,583
But the mystery remains,
111
00:04:51,583 --> 00:04:53,333
why are these deep sea creatures
112
00:04:53,333 --> 00:04:55,583
turning up on the
beaches of California?
113
00:04:55,583 --> 00:04:58,708
Steingass considers the
Sycamore Knoll theory,
114
00:04:58,708 --> 00:05:00,708
but she says it's
not an alien base,
115
00:05:00,708 --> 00:05:03,833
it's a natural geological
formation called a sea mount.
116
00:05:03,833 --> 00:05:07,083
- This is probably just
a normal ocean feature
117
00:05:07,083 --> 00:05:08,542
and sea mounts like this
118
00:05:08,542 --> 00:05:11,208
are actually really
important for ocean life.
119
00:05:11,208 --> 00:05:12,708
- [Tony] But what could
cause the creatures
120
00:05:12,708 --> 00:05:15,583
congregating around the
Sycamore Knoll to wash ashore?
121
00:05:15,583 --> 00:05:18,833
Steingass moves on to the
top secret experiment theory.
122
00:05:18,833 --> 00:05:21,750
- Military testing is
definitely an explanation
123
00:05:21,750 --> 00:05:24,500
of why we might
find deep sea fish
124
00:05:24,500 --> 00:05:26,625
abnormally washed up on shore.
125
00:05:26,625 --> 00:05:29,625
Sonar testing is
incredibly powerful,
126
00:05:29,625 --> 00:05:33,208
being hit with that high
impact of sound and pressure
127
00:05:33,208 --> 00:05:38,333
can be very injurious or even
deadly for marine animals.
128
00:05:38,333 --> 00:05:41,208
- [Tony] Steingass also
suggests a natural cause,
129
00:05:41,208 --> 00:05:43,083
underwater seismic activity.
130
00:05:43,083 --> 00:05:44,875
- Many of the
earth's fault lines
131
00:05:44,875 --> 00:05:48,083
are actually off the
coast of our continents,
132
00:05:48,083 --> 00:05:49,792
so there could be earthquakes
133
00:05:49,792 --> 00:05:52,542
and that's why we have
tsunamis for example.
134
00:05:52,542 --> 00:05:54,583
There's a lot of
volcanic activity
135
00:05:54,583 --> 00:05:56,208
under the ocean as well,
136
00:05:56,208 --> 00:05:58,125
and it's not unfeasible
137
00:05:58,125 --> 00:06:01,542
that this would cause
animals to wash up on shore.
138
00:06:01,542 --> 00:06:02,750
- [Tony] But at
the end of the day,
139
00:06:02,750 --> 00:06:05,375
she thinks the
real culprit is us,
140
00:06:05,375 --> 00:06:07,583
specifically the global
fishing industry.
141
00:06:07,583 --> 00:06:08,917
- Within the last decade,
142
00:06:08,917 --> 00:06:12,833
there's been an uptick
of species washing up
143
00:06:12,833 --> 00:06:15,542
that are traditionally
deep water species.
144
00:06:15,542 --> 00:06:17,708
The reason for this
may have to do with
145
00:06:17,708 --> 00:06:20,083
when humans are out fishing,
146
00:06:20,083 --> 00:06:24,708
we catch a whole variety of
species in those fishing nets
147
00:06:24,708 --> 00:06:28,500
and the animals that aren't
marketable are discarded
148
00:06:28,500 --> 00:06:30,625
and eventually they
float to shore.
149
00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:36,542
- Our verdict?
150
00:06:36,542 --> 00:06:39,083
We're looking at a football
fish and a lancet fish,
151
00:06:39,083 --> 00:06:41,167
both deep water creatures.
152
00:06:41,167 --> 00:06:44,375
As to why they washed up,
that remains a mystery.
153
00:06:44,375 --> 00:06:46,250
I'm drawn to the fishing theory,
154
00:06:46,250 --> 00:06:48,042
but you can pick your favorite.
155
00:06:48,042 --> 00:06:50,292
[dramatic music]
156
00:06:50,292 --> 00:06:51,958
People have always
been surprised
157
00:06:51,958 --> 00:06:53,167
by stories of creatures
158
00:06:53,167 --> 00:06:54,917
with human-like traits.
159
00:06:54,917 --> 00:06:58,708
A dog singing or squirrel
surfing will break the internet,
160
00:06:58,708 --> 00:07:00,875
but can some animals
with special powers
161
00:07:00,875 --> 00:07:03,833
adopt human features
intentionally?
162
00:07:05,042 --> 00:07:09,500
November 7th, 2019, Miao
Village In Kunming, China,
163
00:07:09,500 --> 00:07:12,250
a visitor is wandering
through a park near Kuwei Lake
164
00:07:12,250 --> 00:07:13,708
when she takes this video.
165
00:07:15,458 --> 00:07:19,750
[onlookers speak
foreign language]
166
00:07:21,125 --> 00:07:24,000
The footage shows a fish, but
there's something more here.
167
00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:26,708
There are two dark dots
that look like human eyes,
168
00:07:26,708 --> 00:07:29,583
two vertical lines which
resemble the sides of a nose
169
00:07:29,583 --> 00:07:31,083
and one horizontal one
170
00:07:31,083 --> 00:07:34,458
underneath where a man's
mouth would be, it's uncanny.
171
00:07:34,458 --> 00:07:36,417
Take another look as we zoom in.
172
00:07:36,417 --> 00:07:38,708
- What I'm seeing is
obviously a large fish,
173
00:07:38,708 --> 00:07:41,875
but as it swims
closer to the camera,
174
00:07:41,875 --> 00:07:44,208
it appears to have
a human-like face
175
00:07:44,208 --> 00:07:45,375
where you can actually make out
176
00:07:45,375 --> 00:07:48,917
what appear to be eyes,
a pronounced nose,
177
00:07:48,917 --> 00:07:51,333
this is really creepy
and disturbing.
178
00:07:51,333 --> 00:07:52,917
- [Tony] Field
researcher Ken Gerhard
179
00:07:52,917 --> 00:07:55,750
speaks of this fish's
resemblance to a local legend.
180
00:07:55,750 --> 00:07:57,417
- Dragon's Gate represents
181
00:07:57,417 --> 00:08:00,083
one of the most famous
Chinese legends.
182
00:08:00,083 --> 00:08:03,875
The story describes a carp
in the China's Yangtze River,
183
00:08:03,875 --> 00:08:08,375
which began to swim upstream,
slowly mutating as it went.
184
00:08:08,375 --> 00:08:10,042
And when this carp
finally reached
185
00:08:10,042 --> 00:08:13,125
the head of the Yangtze
River, the Gods rewarded it
186
00:08:13,125 --> 00:08:16,500
by transforming it
into a golden dragon.
187
00:08:16,500 --> 00:08:19,375
In modern depictions
of Chinese dragons,
188
00:08:19,375 --> 00:08:21,417
we often see these large scales,
189
00:08:21,417 --> 00:08:24,708
which is almost a tribute
to this carp fish.
190
00:08:24,708 --> 00:08:29,083
Perhaps this carp or this koi
type of fish is in the process
191
00:08:29,083 --> 00:08:32,542
of transforming into one
of these golden dragons.
192
00:08:32,542 --> 00:08:34,583
- [Tony] Gerhard explores
another possibility
193
00:08:34,583 --> 00:08:36,000
that this creature
194
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:38,292
could be the result of
covert government activity.
195
00:08:38,292 --> 00:08:40,000
- There have been many theories
196
00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:43,667
that China have been
conducting experimentation
197
00:08:43,667 --> 00:08:45,292
with marine animals.
198
00:08:45,292 --> 00:08:47,333
You have examples of porpoises
199
00:08:47,333 --> 00:08:50,417
and seals that have been
trained for military use.
200
00:08:50,417 --> 00:08:52,417
Perhaps they are somehow
201
00:08:52,417 --> 00:08:54,750
trying to manipulate
the genetic makeup
202
00:08:54,750 --> 00:08:57,125
of different of aquatic animals.
203
00:08:58,625 --> 00:09:00,583
- Is this ringing any bells?
204
00:09:00,583 --> 00:09:02,708
It certainly reminded
our team of something,
205
00:09:02,708 --> 00:09:06,417
the human faced shark we
previously investigated.
206
00:09:06,417 --> 00:09:08,417
We decided that
was a birth defect
207
00:09:08,417 --> 00:09:10,958
caused by pollution
in the ocean.
208
00:09:10,958 --> 00:09:14,583
So what exactly is going
on in the waters of China?
209
00:09:14,583 --> 00:09:16,917
We'll turn it over to
our experts to decide.
210
00:09:20,708 --> 00:09:23,375
Biologist Dr. Floyd
Hayes mulls the theory
211
00:09:23,375 --> 00:09:24,833
that the Chinese government
212
00:09:24,833 --> 00:09:27,125
might be trying to mutate
fish with other species.
213
00:09:27,125 --> 00:09:29,167
There have been cases
of fish undergoing
214
00:09:29,167 --> 00:09:30,625
gene editing techniques
215
00:09:30,625 --> 00:09:32,833
that resulted in the
development of limbs with bones,
216
00:09:32,833 --> 00:09:35,208
joints, and musculature.
217
00:09:35,208 --> 00:09:37,333
But Hayes says the
morphology of this fish,
218
00:09:37,333 --> 00:09:40,208
particularly the dorsal spines
and the large thick scales,
219
00:09:40,208 --> 00:09:43,708
are in line with what we'd
expect from a normal carp.
220
00:09:43,708 --> 00:09:46,458
- Hadn't seen any evidence
that it has been mutated
221
00:09:46,458 --> 00:09:48,333
with any kind of other animals
222
00:09:48,333 --> 00:09:50,292
such as a reptile or a mammal.
223
00:09:51,417 --> 00:09:52,958
- Next, Dr. Shea Steingass
224
00:09:52,958 --> 00:09:54,792
weighs in on how the
fish got this way.
225
00:09:54,792 --> 00:09:56,875
She compares the
phenomenon in this video
226
00:09:56,875 --> 00:09:59,708
to our previous case
involving that bizarre shark.
227
00:09:59,708 --> 00:10:01,083
- The human faced shark
228
00:10:01,083 --> 00:10:05,500
had really severe
developmental defects.
229
00:10:05,500 --> 00:10:09,250
What I see here doesn't seem
to have any structural issues.
230
00:10:09,250 --> 00:10:11,125
Because fish hatch from eggs,
231
00:10:11,125 --> 00:10:13,667
it really is survival
of the fittest.
232
00:10:13,667 --> 00:10:15,958
And for an animal
to get this size,
233
00:10:15,958 --> 00:10:17,875
it would have to
be very healthy.
234
00:10:17,875 --> 00:10:21,083
And what we see here are
really distinct markings,
235
00:10:21,083 --> 00:10:22,792
but I don't see
anything biologically
236
00:10:22,792 --> 00:10:24,375
wrong with this fish.
237
00:10:24,375 --> 00:10:27,792
What we see appears to be
a really healthy live carp.
238
00:10:27,792 --> 00:10:30,208
- [Tony] The key here is
that the carp is known
239
00:10:30,208 --> 00:10:32,917
as the plastic species,
with a marked tendency
240
00:10:32,917 --> 00:10:34,750
to produce varieties and races
241
00:10:34,750 --> 00:10:36,375
in response to
selective breeding
242
00:10:36,375 --> 00:10:38,250
and environmental influences.
243
00:10:38,250 --> 00:10:41,417
Steingass says those
markings are no coincidence.
244
00:10:41,417 --> 00:10:43,417
- There have been
other cases of carp
245
00:10:43,417 --> 00:10:44,917
that looked like a human face.
246
00:10:44,917 --> 00:10:47,750
Having markings is a
really common technique
247
00:10:47,750 --> 00:10:49,250
that we call mimicry.
248
00:10:49,250 --> 00:10:51,833
- [Tony] And why would a
fish wanna look like a human?
249
00:10:51,833 --> 00:10:54,417
It's all about survival
of the fittest.
250
00:10:54,417 --> 00:10:56,292
- Having marks
that look like eyes
251
00:10:56,292 --> 00:11:00,042
is a really disconcerting
thing for a predator
252
00:11:00,042 --> 00:11:02,292
because in that split
second where the predator
253
00:11:02,292 --> 00:11:06,167
has to decide if it's going to
go after a prey item or not,
254
00:11:06,167 --> 00:11:09,125
having something that causes
a little bit of uncertainty
255
00:11:09,125 --> 00:11:10,375
is advantageous.
256
00:11:14,708 --> 00:11:15,750
- Our verdict?
257
00:11:15,750 --> 00:11:17,875
Adaptive marking patterns.
258
00:11:17,875 --> 00:11:20,000
Yes, this species of carp
259
00:11:20,000 --> 00:11:22,292
has developed these
strange features over time
260
00:11:22,292 --> 00:11:25,208
to help it survive
in its environment.
261
00:11:25,208 --> 00:11:26,625
And this specimen
262
00:11:26,625 --> 00:11:28,417
just happens to be
exceptionally well-adapted.
263
00:11:32,667 --> 00:11:34,833
- As elusive as the
Loch Ness monster,
264
00:11:34,833 --> 00:11:37,833
but maybe not as famous,
is a legendary sea serpent
265
00:11:37,833 --> 00:11:40,875
said to inhabit the waters
of the Pacific Northwest.
266
00:11:40,875 --> 00:11:43,583
Today, there has been
no actual hard evidence
267
00:11:43,583 --> 00:11:45,667
that this sea monster exists,
268
00:11:45,667 --> 00:11:48,333
but that might
have just changed.
269
00:11:50,042 --> 00:11:53,792
2009, Nushagak Bay, Alaska,
270
00:11:53,792 --> 00:11:56,708
salmon fisherman, Kelly Nash
is on a boat with his sons
271
00:11:56,708 --> 00:11:59,042
Jason and Kyle, when suddenly,
272
00:11:59,042 --> 00:12:02,333
they spot unusual movement
in the water next to them
273
00:12:02,333 --> 00:12:05,000
and start recording this video.
274
00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:06,583
The shaky black
and white footage
275
00:12:06,583 --> 00:12:10,125
shows what appears to be a
long, dark serpentine creature
276
00:12:10,125 --> 00:12:13,042
with humps on its back moving
rapidly through the water.
277
00:12:13,042 --> 00:12:14,625
- [Kelly] Now watch,
his head's gonna pop up.
278
00:12:14,625 --> 00:12:15,375
Check this out.
279
00:12:16,542 --> 00:12:18,042
- [Onlooker] Blue.
280
00:12:18,042 --> 00:12:20,542
- [Tony] Let's
look at that again.
281
00:12:20,542 --> 00:12:22,500
Kelly estimates the
massive creature
282
00:12:22,500 --> 00:12:25,208
to be about 20 to 30 feet long.
283
00:12:25,208 --> 00:12:27,458
While this footage
is curiously unique,
284
00:12:27,458 --> 00:12:29,208
it may actually be showing us
285
00:12:29,208 --> 00:12:31,333
a clearer view of a
legendary creature,
286
00:12:31,333 --> 00:12:33,500
a cryptid as they're known
287
00:12:33,500 --> 00:12:35,250
that's been widely
reported before.
288
00:12:36,542 --> 00:12:41,167
- Cadborosaurus or Caddy is
a mysterious sea creature
289
00:12:42,542 --> 00:12:45,417
that's been reported off the
coast of Pacific North America.
290
00:12:45,417 --> 00:12:46,917
The name is associated
291
00:12:46,917 --> 00:12:48,875
with the location where
it's most been seen,
292
00:12:48,875 --> 00:12:52,625
which is Cadboro Bay,
British Columbia.
293
00:12:52,625 --> 00:12:54,917
Cadborosaurus is
generally described
294
00:12:54,917 --> 00:12:58,083
as an immense serpentine animal,
295
00:12:58,083 --> 00:13:00,875
anywhere from 60 to a
hundred feet in length,
296
00:13:00,875 --> 00:13:04,583
with a horse like head,
sharp, fish like teeth,
297
00:13:04,583 --> 00:13:07,292
giant forward facing eyes.
298
00:13:07,292 --> 00:13:09,667
- [Tony] There have been
more than 300 sightings
299
00:13:09,667 --> 00:13:11,833
of Caddy over the
past 200 years,
300
00:13:11,833 --> 00:13:13,917
including one case in the 1930s
301
00:13:13,917 --> 00:13:15,042
that may have produced
302
00:13:15,042 --> 00:13:17,542
actual physical evidence
of the creature.
303
00:13:17,542 --> 00:13:19,917
- During the summer of 1937
304
00:13:19,917 --> 00:13:22,375
off the coast of
British Columbia,
305
00:13:22,375 --> 00:13:24,042
there was a strange animal
306
00:13:24,042 --> 00:13:26,833
that was found in the
stomach of a sperm whale.
307
00:13:26,833 --> 00:13:30,167
This animal popped out that
was snake-like in form,
308
00:13:30,167 --> 00:13:35,042
had a horse like head, two
flippers and a fluke tail.
309
00:13:36,208 --> 00:13:37,917
The man in charge
actually had these workers
310
00:13:37,917 --> 00:13:39,500
take some photographs of it.
311
00:13:39,500 --> 00:13:43,292
Subsequently, this became known
as the Naden Harbor Carcass.
312
00:13:43,292 --> 00:13:45,375
In my opinion, this
is the same animal
313
00:13:45,375 --> 00:13:47,250
that we see in this video.
314
00:13:47,250 --> 00:13:49,167
But there are other
theories as well
315
00:13:49,167 --> 00:13:50,833
that perhaps we could be looking
316
00:13:50,833 --> 00:13:53,875
at a primitive type
of snake-like whale
317
00:13:53,875 --> 00:13:55,333
known as a basilosaur.
318
00:13:57,042 --> 00:13:59,917
- [Tony] The basilosaur
or Basilosaurus,
319
00:13:59,917 --> 00:14:01,958
was a fearsome predatory whale
320
00:14:01,958 --> 00:14:04,500
which swam the oceans
nearly 40 million years ago.
321
00:14:04,500 --> 00:14:07,083
And while scientists
first described this
322
00:14:07,083 --> 00:14:09,875
as a giant reptile,
further research
323
00:14:09,875 --> 00:14:12,042
determined it to
be a marine mammal,
324
00:14:12,042 --> 00:14:14,750
one that could grow up
to 65 feet in length.
325
00:14:14,750 --> 00:14:16,542
Could this be the same creature?
326
00:14:16,542 --> 00:14:17,875
- There have been hundreds
327
00:14:17,875 --> 00:14:19,375
if not thousands of
eyewitness accounts.
328
00:14:19,375 --> 00:14:21,708
So I think that we could
build a pretty strong case
329
00:14:21,708 --> 00:14:23,833
that this animal
really does exist.
330
00:14:25,917 --> 00:14:27,875
- Right after this
video was revealed,
331
00:14:27,875 --> 00:14:30,208
two Cadborosaurus researchers
332
00:14:30,208 --> 00:14:33,375
went to visit the Nash
family who shot this footage.
333
00:14:33,375 --> 00:14:35,542
They claim the creature
fully lifted its head
334
00:14:35,542 --> 00:14:39,250
out of the water and even
turned to face their camcorder.
335
00:14:39,250 --> 00:14:40,875
But of course, that
piece of evidence
336
00:14:40,875 --> 00:14:42,833
isn't on this recording.
337
00:14:42,833 --> 00:14:44,167
Let's see what our
experts have to say
338
00:14:44,167 --> 00:14:46,125
about the evidence that remains.
339
00:14:50,250 --> 00:14:53,125
We first wanted to check the
authenticity of this tape.
340
00:14:53,125 --> 00:14:56,042
- This video has indications
that it was enhanced,
341
00:14:56,042 --> 00:14:58,750
it has processing
done to enlarge it
342
00:14:58,750 --> 00:15:00,083
as well as stabilize it.
343
00:15:00,083 --> 00:15:02,125
There's too many
unknown variables here
344
00:15:02,125 --> 00:15:05,208
to actually arrive at some
sort of accurate conclusion
345
00:15:05,208 --> 00:15:07,583
because the video
has been enhanced.
346
00:15:07,583 --> 00:15:09,500
- So there's already a red flag.
347
00:15:09,500 --> 00:15:10,625
But to be fair,
348
00:15:10,625 --> 00:15:14,125
we spoke with marine
biologist, Shea Steingass.
349
00:15:14,125 --> 00:15:16,375
She first looks at this
creature's possible connection
350
00:15:16,375 --> 00:15:19,375
with the prehistoric
Basilosaurus.
351
00:15:19,375 --> 00:15:21,333
- I don't think that's
what we're looking at
352
00:15:21,333 --> 00:15:23,625
because the body type
of the Basilosaur
353
00:15:23,625 --> 00:15:27,375
was actually pretty solid, it
wasn't a snake-like animal.
354
00:15:27,375 --> 00:15:29,375
- [Tony] However,
Steingass believes
355
00:15:29,375 --> 00:15:31,125
this creature does
have more in common
356
00:15:31,125 --> 00:15:33,542
with the marine
mammal Basilosaurus
357
00:15:33,542 --> 00:15:37,292
than the supposed reptile
corpse from Naden Harbor.
358
00:15:37,292 --> 00:15:41,958
- Nushagak Bay is part of
a polar arctic environment,
359
00:15:41,958 --> 00:15:44,417
very cold environment
to live in.
360
00:15:44,417 --> 00:15:48,333
It's very unlikely that any
kind of reptile-like animal,
361
00:15:48,333 --> 00:15:52,583
especially this size, would
be existing in Nushagak Bay.
362
00:15:52,583 --> 00:15:56,333
The animals that thrive here
are typically either fish,
363
00:15:56,333 --> 00:16:00,083
invertebrates that live on
the bottom or marine mammals.
364
00:16:00,083 --> 00:16:02,042
There's really no
reptiles or snakes
365
00:16:02,042 --> 00:16:03,917
that this could be mistaken for.
366
00:16:04,875 --> 00:16:06,333
- [Tony] Many online critics
367
00:16:06,333 --> 00:16:09,083
claim we are just looking
at some piece of trash
368
00:16:09,083 --> 00:16:10,542
or floating debris,
369
00:16:10,542 --> 00:16:12,542
but the dozens of tech
people and fishermen
370
00:16:12,542 --> 00:16:14,417
who have studied this video
371
00:16:14,417 --> 00:16:18,042
can't explain how debris could
move in such an organic way.
372
00:16:18,042 --> 00:16:21,042
So with all of these potential
possibilities ruled out,
373
00:16:21,042 --> 00:16:24,083
does Steingass have
any idea what this is?
374
00:16:24,083 --> 00:16:27,542
Unfortunately, like many who
have chased Caddy's tail,
375
00:16:27,542 --> 00:16:28,542
she's stumped.
376
00:16:28,542 --> 00:16:29,917
- This is really
interesting footage
377
00:16:29,917 --> 00:16:32,583
and part of the charm
of it for me is that
378
00:16:32,583 --> 00:16:35,625
it's difficult to tell
exactly what we're looking at.
379
00:16:35,625 --> 00:16:39,542
So this might be one of those
classic sea monster videos
380
00:16:39,542 --> 00:16:41,625
that's gonna stick
around for a long time.
381
00:16:46,500 --> 00:16:47,667
- Our verdict?
382
00:16:47,667 --> 00:16:50,625
Possible cryptid if
the video is legit,
383
00:16:50,625 --> 00:16:52,250
and yes, that's an if,
384
00:16:52,250 --> 00:16:54,917
whatever this thing
is has stumped our
385
00:16:54,917 --> 00:16:56,542
ace marine biologist.
386
00:16:56,542 --> 00:16:59,375
People have been looking
at this footage since 2009
387
00:16:59,375 --> 00:17:02,000
and to this day, it
remains a mystery.
388
00:17:05,875 --> 00:17:06,958
On this show,
389
00:17:07,375 --> 00:17:08,583
we love nothing more than
a good deep sea mystery,
390
00:17:08,792 --> 00:17:11,208
especially when there's a
very large creature involved.
391
00:17:11,208 --> 00:17:14,042
And this next video
is so mind bending,
392
00:17:14,042 --> 00:17:16,750
it would have Jules
Verne himself saying,
393
00:17:16,750 --> 00:17:18,125
"Come on, Monsieur."
394
00:17:20,208 --> 00:17:23,417
2017, the Mediterranean Sea.
395
00:17:24,667 --> 00:17:27,917
A team working a debris
sweep along ocean pipelines
396
00:17:27,917 --> 00:17:30,208
comes across what at first
397
00:17:30,208 --> 00:17:34,167
looks like just another deep
sea carcass to be cleared away.
398
00:17:34,167 --> 00:17:36,417
But closer inspection reveals
399
00:17:36,417 --> 00:17:39,125
this is truly something unusual.
400
00:17:39,125 --> 00:17:42,083
What appears to be a 90
foot long dusty spine
401
00:17:42,083 --> 00:17:44,708
sits undisturbed on the
bottom of the ocean.
402
00:17:44,708 --> 00:17:46,042
A remote controlled crane
403
00:17:46,042 --> 00:17:48,167
reaches out to
investigate the skeleton,
404
00:17:48,167 --> 00:17:51,292
turning over one of the
vertebrae, which disintegrates.
405
00:17:53,167 --> 00:17:55,917
British podcaster and
investigator Debbie Hatswell
406
00:17:55,917 --> 00:17:58,708
was one of the first people
to see this intriguing film
407
00:17:58,708 --> 00:18:01,542
after a member of the
pipeline maintenance team
408
00:18:01,542 --> 00:18:03,250
reached out to her.
409
00:18:03,250 --> 00:18:05,792
- He said they've seen a lot
of carcasses on the sea floor.
410
00:18:05,792 --> 00:18:08,500
And I've seen whale carcasses
and our fish and all that
411
00:18:08,500 --> 00:18:11,125
and it just doesn't fit, it
doesn't fit with what they are.
412
00:18:11,125 --> 00:18:14,083
He's saying this is an anomaly
413
00:18:14,083 --> 00:18:16,833
and he's felt that he was
a very, very old animal
414
00:18:16,833 --> 00:18:18,292
of some kind.
415
00:18:18,292 --> 00:18:21,458
So I reached out to a
number of marine biologists
416
00:18:21,458 --> 00:18:25,000
and nobody really got back to
me with it as to what it was.
417
00:18:25,000 --> 00:18:27,375
- Ken Gerhard explores the idea
418
00:18:27,375 --> 00:18:29,208
that perhaps these
are the remains
419
00:18:29,208 --> 00:18:33,917
of a long extinct ocean
predator, the dreaded Megalodon.
420
00:18:33,917 --> 00:18:36,625
- In 2022, the Atlantic
Shark Institute
421
00:18:36,625 --> 00:18:39,458
out of Rhode Island
was deploying sonar
422
00:18:39,458 --> 00:18:42,083
when they encountered what
they believed to be a shark
423
00:18:42,083 --> 00:18:44,333
of unbelievable proportions,
424
00:18:44,333 --> 00:18:47,208
perhaps 50 to 60
to feet in length.
425
00:18:47,208 --> 00:18:50,750
Now if so, this would
be the best account
426
00:18:50,750 --> 00:18:52,375
of a modern Megalodon.
427
00:18:52,375 --> 00:18:54,417
- [Tony] The Megalodon,
a nautical nightmare
428
00:18:54,417 --> 00:18:57,583
that experts believe could
weigh as much as 50 tons
429
00:18:57,583 --> 00:19:00,250
has been thought extinct
for nearly 3 million years.
430
00:19:00,250 --> 00:19:01,833
Have these Rhode
Island researchers
431
00:19:01,833 --> 00:19:05,500
uncovered a modern day version
of this historical monster?
432
00:19:05,500 --> 00:19:08,542
And if so, could we be
looking at the remnants of one
433
00:19:08,542 --> 00:19:09,667
in this video?
434
00:19:09,667 --> 00:19:12,292
- This would certainly
fit within the paradigm
435
00:19:12,292 --> 00:19:14,542
of what we know about Megalodon.
436
00:19:14,542 --> 00:19:17,667
- Gerhard also sees a connection
between this discovery
437
00:19:17,667 --> 00:19:20,167
and the classic
mythology of the region.
438
00:19:20,167 --> 00:19:21,292
- In Greek mythology,
439
00:19:21,292 --> 00:19:23,792
different sea
monsters like Cetus,
440
00:19:23,792 --> 00:19:26,542
Charybdis, the Lernaean Hydra
441
00:19:26,542 --> 00:19:28,792
were said to live throughout
the Mediterranean sea.
442
00:19:28,792 --> 00:19:30,625
- [Tony] And while
there are many suspects,
443
00:19:30,625 --> 00:19:33,292
there's one sea dragon
sighting in particular
444
00:19:33,292 --> 00:19:35,708
that Gerhard thinks
could be connected.
445
00:19:35,708 --> 00:19:38,583
- In October, 1907,
446
00:19:38,583 --> 00:19:42,000
fishermen on the
island of Corsica
447
00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:43,417
claimed that they
were terrorized
448
00:19:43,417 --> 00:19:46,625
by a horrible 200
foot sea dragon
449
00:19:46,625 --> 00:19:49,250
that actually ripped
apart their nets.
450
00:19:49,250 --> 00:19:51,750
And the fishermen were
so scared to go back out
451
00:19:51,750 --> 00:19:55,000
and fish that they actually
called on the government
452
00:19:55,000 --> 00:19:58,333
to bring in a torpedo boat
in order to kill the monster.
453
00:19:58,333 --> 00:20:00,042
And that just happens
to be the location
454
00:20:00,042 --> 00:20:04,250
where we've got this footage
of a 90 foot spinal column.
455
00:20:07,750 --> 00:20:10,750
- Sea Dragons can be found
in all sorts of ancient texts
456
00:20:10,750 --> 00:20:13,542
and tales dating back
thousands of years,
457
00:20:13,542 --> 00:20:16,042
from Norse Mythology's
Midgard serpent
458
00:20:16,042 --> 00:20:19,208
to the ancient Babylonian
saltwater dragon, Tiamat,
459
00:20:19,208 --> 00:20:21,292
who many say was rebranded
460
00:20:21,292 --> 00:20:23,958
as the Leviathan in
the Old Testament.
461
00:20:23,958 --> 00:20:25,708
Is there a connection here?
462
00:20:25,708 --> 00:20:29,125
Let's see if our experts can
help slay this oceanic mystery.
463
00:20:29,125 --> 00:20:31,708
[upbeat music]
464
00:20:34,542 --> 00:20:37,958
- It's been hypothesized that
this might be a sea dragon.
465
00:20:37,958 --> 00:20:39,542
That's probably not the case
466
00:20:39,542 --> 00:20:42,375
'cause we really don't have
any scientific evidence
467
00:20:42,375 --> 00:20:44,708
of these creatures existing.
468
00:20:44,708 --> 00:20:47,250
- [Tony] Steingass also
points to the fact that
469
00:20:47,250 --> 00:20:49,708
we can see what
appears to be a pelvis,
470
00:20:49,708 --> 00:20:51,875
something not found in
the numerous depictions
471
00:20:51,875 --> 00:20:53,375
of these serpent like creatures.
472
00:20:53,375 --> 00:20:56,500
- What we're actually seeing
here is a very old skeleton
473
00:20:56,500 --> 00:20:58,833
of some kind of modern animal.
474
00:20:58,833 --> 00:21:01,667
- But the only documented
modern marine animal
475
00:21:01,667 --> 00:21:04,542
that could possibly grow to
this length would be a whale.
476
00:21:04,542 --> 00:21:06,208
Could that be what this is?
477
00:21:06,208 --> 00:21:07,917
- I would say the chances
478
00:21:07,917 --> 00:21:11,042
that this is a really large
whale skeleton are really slim
479
00:21:11,042 --> 00:21:14,375
because we would likely see
other types of large bones
480
00:21:14,375 --> 00:21:17,292
like a skull if we were
to see a spinal column.
481
00:21:17,292 --> 00:21:18,958
These remains aren't
like anything
482
00:21:18,958 --> 00:21:20,542
I've really seen before.
483
00:21:20,542 --> 00:21:22,542
- With Dr. Steingass at a loss,
484
00:21:22,542 --> 00:21:25,375
we checked with wildlife
biologist Stephanie Manka
485
00:21:25,375 --> 00:21:27,750
to see if this could
be a modern Megalodon
486
00:21:27,750 --> 00:21:30,583
like the one thought to be
discovered near Rhode Island.
487
00:21:30,583 --> 00:21:34,375
- If it were a Megalodon, I
wouldn't expect to see the bone
488
00:21:34,375 --> 00:21:36,833
as intact as this.
489
00:21:36,833 --> 00:21:40,750
Megalodons, like other sharks
instead of bone skeletons,
490
00:21:40,750 --> 00:21:44,292
they have cartilage skeletons
which don't fossilize well.
491
00:21:44,292 --> 00:21:47,083
Bone contains minerals
whereas cartilage doesn't.
492
00:21:47,083 --> 00:21:49,167
Bones are much harder,
493
00:21:49,167 --> 00:21:51,833
and if you think about your ear,
494
00:21:51,833 --> 00:21:54,208
this part where it
bends is the cartilage
495
00:21:54,208 --> 00:21:57,292
and that's what shark's
skeletons are made of.
496
00:21:57,292 --> 00:21:58,792
- [Tony] When
cartilage breaks down,
497
00:21:58,792 --> 00:22:00,958
it turns into a
jelly-like substance
498
00:22:00,958 --> 00:22:02,833
that dissolves into the water,
499
00:22:02,833 --> 00:22:05,792
which is why the only proof
we have for Megalodons
500
00:22:05,792 --> 00:22:07,292
are their teeth.
501
00:22:07,292 --> 00:22:09,708
And as for that alleged
Megalodon spotted
502
00:22:09,708 --> 00:22:12,458
by the Atlantic Shark
Institute of Rhode Island,
503
00:22:12,458 --> 00:22:15,708
further research indicates
this sonar image is more likely
504
00:22:15,708 --> 00:22:18,167
a large school of
Atlantic mackerel.
505
00:22:18,167 --> 00:22:20,208
So with all of our
theories ruled out,
506
00:22:20,208 --> 00:22:22,125
what is Manka's best guess?
507
00:22:22,125 --> 00:22:25,000
- I believe that
this is a whale.
508
00:22:25,000 --> 00:22:27,625
What is probably going on
here is the whale skeleton
509
00:22:27,625 --> 00:22:30,542
has been on the ocean
floor for so long
510
00:22:30,542 --> 00:22:34,250
that organisms have
eaten away at the bone
511
00:22:34,250 --> 00:22:36,542
and there are fin whales
in the Mediterranean,
512
00:22:36,542 --> 00:22:38,708
which are the second
largest whale species.
513
00:22:38,708 --> 00:22:42,292
They usually don't
get up to 30 meters,
514
00:22:42,292 --> 00:22:45,125
so there is a little
size discrepancy,
515
00:22:45,125 --> 00:22:50,000
but everything else seems to
allude that it is a whale.
516
00:22:54,833 --> 00:22:55,458
- Our verdict?
517
00:22:55,458 --> 00:22:57,250
Unknown sea beast.
518
00:22:57,250 --> 00:22:58,958
Stephanie Manka
thinks it could be
519
00:22:58,958 --> 00:23:02,208
an abnormally large whale,
but our marine biologist,
520
00:23:02,208 --> 00:23:04,833
Dr. Steingass says no way.
521
00:23:04,833 --> 00:23:07,042
Until there is further
investigation
522
00:23:07,042 --> 00:23:10,292
of the skeleton itself beyond
this video evidence,
523
00:23:10,292 --> 00:23:12,000
these bones will
remain a mystery.
524
00:23:16,042 --> 00:23:18,208
- The imagery of the creature
from the black lagoon
525
00:23:18,208 --> 00:23:22,125
has captivated our imaginations
for almost 75 years.
526
00:23:22,125 --> 00:23:25,083
But what if I told you
there was a real creature
527
00:23:25,083 --> 00:23:26,708
from a mud lagoon?
528
00:23:27,750 --> 00:23:31,542
August 8th, 2017, North
Queensland, Australia.
529
00:23:31,542 --> 00:23:33,500
David White who runs cruises
530
00:23:33,500 --> 00:23:36,333
in the Daintree River
Wildlife Preserve,
531
00:23:36,333 --> 00:23:38,500
is hoping to capture
footage of a crocodile
532
00:23:38,500 --> 00:23:40,542
he'd spotted earlier in the day,
533
00:23:40,542 --> 00:23:45,417
but instead, he captures
something much more disturbing.
534
00:23:45,417 --> 00:23:47,875
A tide pool sits undisturbed,
535
00:23:47,875 --> 00:23:49,708
something sticks
out of the water.
536
00:23:49,708 --> 00:23:52,208
Still, it could
almost be a rock,
537
00:23:52,208 --> 00:23:54,083
but then slowly,
538
00:23:54,083 --> 00:23:57,708
it begins to descend
straight down into the pool.
539
00:23:57,708 --> 00:23:59,792
It goes down, down, down
540
00:24:00,917 --> 00:24:03,750
until eventually it
sinks under the surface
541
00:24:03,750 --> 00:24:08,708
and out of view, leaving only
a tiny bubble in its wake.
542
00:24:08,708 --> 00:24:12,708
Is this a creature, a rock
or something else entirely?
543
00:24:12,708 --> 00:24:16,167
- When I think of Australia,
I think of the bunyip.
544
00:24:16,167 --> 00:24:17,500
Like many legendary creatures,
545
00:24:17,500 --> 00:24:19,958
the bunyip has various
interpretations,
546
00:24:19,958 --> 00:24:24,000
but the most common one is
that it is an aquatic creature
547
00:24:24,000 --> 00:24:27,500
covered in hair, with
a head like a dog,
548
00:24:27,500 --> 00:24:29,667
very large and powerful.
549
00:24:29,667 --> 00:24:33,083
And the aboriginal people
greatly fear the bunyip
550
00:24:33,083 --> 00:24:35,875
because it's said to come
onto the land at night
551
00:24:35,875 --> 00:24:39,208
and drag its unwilling
victims back into the swamp.
552
00:24:39,208 --> 00:24:40,208
- [Tony] Bunyip sightings
553
00:24:40,208 --> 00:24:41,833
were reported in
Australia newspapers
554
00:24:41,833 --> 00:24:44,333
throughout the 19th
and 20th centuries
555
00:24:44,333 --> 00:24:47,000
dating as far back as 1851
556
00:24:47,000 --> 00:24:48,042
where it was reported
557
00:24:48,042 --> 00:24:50,458
that a bunyip had
killed an aboriginal man
558
00:24:50,458 --> 00:24:52,708
and had to be speared to death.
559
00:24:52,708 --> 00:24:54,417
- Being that the bunyip legend
560
00:24:54,417 --> 00:24:56,875
is so prevalent
throughout Australia,
561
00:24:56,875 --> 00:24:59,500
I think we have to stop and
consider the possibility
562
00:24:59,500 --> 00:25:00,833
that what we could
be looking at here
563
00:25:00,833 --> 00:25:04,708
might be at the root of
this bunyip mythology.
564
00:25:06,375 --> 00:25:07,792
- So the theory suggests
565
00:25:07,792 --> 00:25:10,625
that this is in fact some
kind of living thing.
566
00:25:10,625 --> 00:25:13,125
Is it possibly a new discovery?
567
00:25:13,125 --> 00:25:14,417
Australian taxonomists
568
00:25:14,417 --> 00:25:17,792
name an average of 1000
new species each year
569
00:25:17,792 --> 00:25:19,083
and its estimated that
570
00:25:19,083 --> 00:25:21,125
two thirds of the
continent's total species
571
00:25:21,125 --> 00:25:23,042
remain undocumented.
572
00:25:23,042 --> 00:25:25,167
Let's see what our
experts can discover.
573
00:25:28,875 --> 00:25:31,500
Some have guessed that we're
looking at the front tip
574
00:25:31,500 --> 00:25:33,542
of an Indo-Pacific crocodile,
575
00:25:33,542 --> 00:25:35,375
a species prevalent
in this region,
576
00:25:35,375 --> 00:25:37,583
but our marine
biologist is skeptical.
577
00:25:37,583 --> 00:25:39,958
- I can rule this out
entirely as a crocodile
578
00:25:39,958 --> 00:25:42,542
because I don't
see any of the body
579
00:25:42,542 --> 00:25:45,542
or head features
of a crocodilian.
580
00:25:45,542 --> 00:25:47,542
It's not behaving
like a crocodile,
581
00:25:47,542 --> 00:25:50,083
it's coming vertically
up out of the water.
582
00:25:50,083 --> 00:25:52,708
And we have a little bit
of size reference here
583
00:25:52,708 --> 00:25:55,375
when we see the bubble on
the surface of the water,
584
00:25:55,375 --> 00:25:58,875
which means whatever this is,
it's actually pretty small.
585
00:25:58,875 --> 00:26:03,167
And in addition to that, it
actually has pretty smooth skin.
586
00:26:03,167 --> 00:26:04,375
- [Tony] For those same reasons,
587
00:26:04,375 --> 00:26:06,292
both size and smoothness,
588
00:26:06,292 --> 00:26:09,458
Steingass thinks this
creature contradicts reports
589
00:26:09,458 --> 00:26:10,875
of the legendary bunyip.
590
00:26:10,875 --> 00:26:13,792
- I would probably rule
out that this is a bunyip,
591
00:26:13,792 --> 00:26:16,708
especially because the bunyip
is said to hunt at night
592
00:26:16,708 --> 00:26:19,208
and this footage was
taken during the day.
593
00:26:19,208 --> 00:26:20,708
- [Tony] Then what is it?
594
00:26:20,708 --> 00:26:23,583
- Based on this video and
looking at the environment,
595
00:26:23,583 --> 00:26:25,792
I think this is
actually a mud skipper.
596
00:26:27,375 --> 00:26:28,875
- [Tony] The mud
skipper is a fish
597
00:26:28,875 --> 00:26:32,042
that can spend as much time
in air as in the water.
598
00:26:32,042 --> 00:26:34,250
It can grow up to
12 inches in length,
599
00:26:34,250 --> 00:26:36,042
breathes through its skin
600
00:26:36,042 --> 00:26:39,208
and uses its fins
like legs to walk.
601
00:26:39,208 --> 00:26:42,792
But NASA geologist Bob
Anderson says that can't be
602
00:26:42,792 --> 00:26:45,375
because the environment
is just too harsh
603
00:26:45,375 --> 00:26:46,917
for most known animals.
604
00:26:46,917 --> 00:26:49,792
- The environment around
it, it's very carbonaceous.
605
00:26:49,792 --> 00:26:51,083
There's probably
a lot of sulfate
606
00:26:51,083 --> 00:26:53,917
because the landscape is
white, so it's very toxic,
607
00:26:53,917 --> 00:26:56,375
it's not where a
reptile, an alligator
608
00:26:56,375 --> 00:26:57,625
or anything would wanna live
609
00:26:57,625 --> 00:26:59,083
because there's no
food source for them.
610
00:26:59,083 --> 00:27:02,083
- [Tony] So does that rule
out any living organism?
611
00:27:02,083 --> 00:27:03,208
Not exactly.
612
00:27:03,208 --> 00:27:06,042
- If you notice, there's
a slight green tint
613
00:27:06,042 --> 00:27:09,333
to the creature,
and so most likely,
614
00:27:09,333 --> 00:27:11,042
that is a living organism,
615
00:27:11,042 --> 00:27:13,208
that's what we
call an algal mat.
616
00:27:13,208 --> 00:27:15,708
- [Tony] An algal
mat is a mat of algae
617
00:27:15,708 --> 00:27:18,125
that may grow in
water or on rocks
618
00:27:18,125 --> 00:27:20,500
in both toxic and
non-toxic environments,
619
00:27:20,500 --> 00:27:24,042
which can balloon up and float
to the surface while forming.
620
00:27:24,042 --> 00:27:26,375
- In fish tank, you'll
see algae buildup,
621
00:27:26,375 --> 00:27:27,792
and if you have a pump in there,
622
00:27:27,792 --> 00:27:29,917
you'll see that the algae
literally starts to rise
623
00:27:29,917 --> 00:27:32,208
because the air bubbles
get trapped underneath
624
00:27:32,208 --> 00:27:34,875
to lift that mat into
the air, release it,
625
00:27:34,875 --> 00:27:37,042
and then the mat goes
back down to the bottom.
626
00:27:37,042 --> 00:27:38,583
- [Tony] Makes sense in theory,
627
00:27:38,583 --> 00:27:42,125
but algal mats tend to
look like, well mats.
628
00:27:42,125 --> 00:27:44,542
This thing has a
completely different shape,
629
00:27:44,542 --> 00:27:45,708
so what gives?
630
00:27:50,250 --> 00:27:51,208
Our verdict?
631
00:27:51,208 --> 00:27:53,542
Unknown organic specimen.
632
00:27:53,542 --> 00:27:55,208
While our experts disagree
633
00:27:55,208 --> 00:27:58,875
on what this mysterious mud
creature is, they both concur
634
00:27:58,875 --> 00:28:02,208
that it is in fact an organic
life form of some sort,
635
00:28:02,208 --> 00:28:05,208
proving that even in the
harshest of environments,
636
00:28:05,208 --> 00:28:06,167
life finds a way.
637
00:28:10,375 --> 00:28:11,958
- Now it's time for a classic;
638
00:28:11,958 --> 00:28:13,667
one of those decades
old incidents
639
00:28:13,667 --> 00:28:16,167
that still inspires head
scratching to this day.
640
00:28:16,167 --> 00:28:19,333
As we say in the business,
this story has legs,
641
00:28:19,333 --> 00:28:22,042
even though the alleged
creature you're about to see
642
00:28:22,042 --> 00:28:22,917
does not.
643
00:28:23,833 --> 00:28:26,333
It's December 12th, 1965,
644
00:28:26,333 --> 00:28:28,875
Robert Lesarek is on a
motorboat with his family
645
00:28:28,875 --> 00:28:31,542
near Hook Island in
Queensland, Australia.
646
00:28:31,542 --> 00:28:32,792
While crossing the Bay,
647
00:28:32,792 --> 00:28:34,583
Robert's wife notices
a strange object
648
00:28:34,583 --> 00:28:36,042
from the bottom of the lagoon,
649
00:28:36,042 --> 00:28:38,333
the family starts
snapping pictures.
650
00:28:38,333 --> 00:28:41,042
The photo shows what appears
to be a massive sea creature
651
00:28:41,042 --> 00:28:44,083
that resembles a
terrifyingly large tadpole.
652
00:28:44,083 --> 00:28:47,333
The long, dark serpentine
creature can be easily seen
653
00:28:47,333 --> 00:28:49,333
beneath the clear
waters of the lagoon.
654
00:28:50,583 --> 00:28:52,417
It looks to be at
least 30 feet long
655
00:28:52,417 --> 00:28:53,750
based on the proportional size
656
00:28:53,750 --> 00:28:55,125
of the boater in the background,
657
00:28:55,125 --> 00:28:57,375
and it seems to be coiled
in the shape of an S.
658
00:28:59,000 --> 00:29:01,667
The Sareks say they weren't
terrified, they were fascinated.
659
00:29:01,667 --> 00:29:04,208
- They decided to
jump in the water
660
00:29:04,208 --> 00:29:07,250
and get a closer look at
whatever this thing was.
661
00:29:07,250 --> 00:29:10,875
It wasn't moving, so they
assumed that it was dead.
662
00:29:10,875 --> 00:29:12,833
- [Tony] Serpents like
this are a popular feature
663
00:29:12,833 --> 00:29:14,833
of the local Australian lore.
664
00:29:14,833 --> 00:29:16,208
- There's a creature
from the mythology
665
00:29:16,208 --> 00:29:17,875
of Australia's
indigenous peoples
666
00:29:17,875 --> 00:29:19,375
called the rainbow serpent.
667
00:29:19,375 --> 00:29:21,917
When you see a rainbow
in the sky in Australia,
668
00:29:21,917 --> 00:29:24,292
that's said to be
the rainbow serpent
669
00:29:24,292 --> 00:29:27,333
traveling from one
water hole to another.
670
00:29:27,333 --> 00:29:30,167
- [Tony] So is the rainbow
serpent more than a myth?
671
00:29:30,167 --> 00:29:31,542
Could the myth
have been inspired
672
00:29:31,542 --> 00:29:34,042
by something rare but real?
673
00:29:34,042 --> 00:29:36,250
- So one theory that
has been floated
674
00:29:36,250 --> 00:29:39,542
is that perhaps we're looking
at a prehistoric creature,
675
00:29:39,542 --> 00:29:41,250
specifically a Mosasaur
676
00:29:41,250 --> 00:29:43,042
which lived in oceans
around the world
677
00:29:43,042 --> 00:29:47,458
from between 82 and
66 million years ago.
678
00:29:47,458 --> 00:29:49,958
- [Tony] Technically,
Mosasaurs weren't dinosaurs,
679
00:29:49,958 --> 00:29:52,375
they're more closely related
to lizards and snakes.
680
00:29:52,375 --> 00:29:54,875
As such, they were able
to unhinge their jaws
681
00:29:54,875 --> 00:29:57,250
to eat prey nearly the
size of their bodies.
682
00:29:58,500 --> 00:30:00,875
It seems ridiculous to
think an extinct sea species
683
00:30:00,875 --> 00:30:03,333
could still be swimming, but
McCarthy doesn't think so.
684
00:30:03,333 --> 00:30:05,833
- There was a
particular type of fish,
685
00:30:05,833 --> 00:30:08,375
Coelacanth, that was
thought to be extinct
686
00:30:08,375 --> 00:30:11,458
that was then
rediscovered in the 1930s.
687
00:30:11,458 --> 00:30:13,583
So it's not unheard of
688
00:30:13,583 --> 00:30:17,667
for science to believe that
a creature has gone extinct
689
00:30:17,667 --> 00:30:20,083
and for it to pop back up.
690
00:30:20,083 --> 00:30:23,167
So we could be looking
at maybe a new species
691
00:30:23,167 --> 00:30:26,750
or maybe a creature that
we thought was extinct,
692
00:30:26,750 --> 00:30:27,917
but actually isn't.
693
00:30:29,792 --> 00:30:31,708
- The people on the
boat later surmise
694
00:30:31,708 --> 00:30:33,167
that the creature
may have been wounded
695
00:30:33,167 --> 00:30:36,125
by a ship's propeller
in deeper water
696
00:30:36,125 --> 00:30:37,708
and had decided to take refuge
697
00:30:37,708 --> 00:30:39,750
in the shallow
lagoon to recover.
698
00:30:39,750 --> 00:30:42,458
They said it had eyes
with slit shaped pupils
699
00:30:42,458 --> 00:30:45,750
on the top of its head, and
its whole body was smooth
700
00:30:45,750 --> 00:30:48,125
with no fins or spines.
701
00:30:48,125 --> 00:30:49,917
But what will our experts see?
702
00:30:53,917 --> 00:30:56,667
First off, could the
photo have been doctored?
703
00:30:56,667 --> 00:31:01,083
- So from the exif analysis,
no signatures of Photoshopping
704
00:31:01,083 --> 00:31:03,333
or any third party
editing software
705
00:31:03,333 --> 00:31:06,042
was detected of this
particular image.
706
00:31:06,042 --> 00:31:09,042
Now whether or not the print
photography was manipulated
707
00:31:09,042 --> 00:31:11,375
prior to production
of this image,
708
00:31:11,375 --> 00:31:14,042
I can't say with
certainty, but digitally,
709
00:31:14,042 --> 00:31:15,917
nothing has occurred
to these images.
710
00:31:15,917 --> 00:31:17,708
- So then what is it?
711
00:31:17,708 --> 00:31:19,375
We turn to our marine biologist
712
00:31:19,375 --> 00:31:22,708
who's pretty sure this
is not a Mosasaur.
713
00:31:22,708 --> 00:31:25,917
- Mosasaurs were very
dynamic predators,
714
00:31:25,917 --> 00:31:28,458
they were probably very fast.
715
00:31:28,458 --> 00:31:31,583
They had four flippers
that you would see here,
716
00:31:31,583 --> 00:31:33,417
and they had a
bit of a long neck
717
00:31:33,417 --> 00:31:36,500
and a smaller head with
really sharp teeth.
718
00:31:36,500 --> 00:31:38,167
Also, Mosasaurs were typically
719
00:31:38,167 --> 00:31:40,292
known to be deeper sea animals.
720
00:31:40,292 --> 00:31:42,458
They didn't spend
any time on land,
721
00:31:42,458 --> 00:31:46,208
and so they probably wouldn't
be in shallow water like this.
722
00:31:46,208 --> 00:31:50,375
So I don't think this
is some kind of a living
723
00:31:50,375 --> 00:31:55,083
predatory animal that we
think of as prehistoric.
724
00:31:55,083 --> 00:31:56,417
- [Tony] Could it be something
725
00:31:56,417 --> 00:31:58,375
that was never even
alive in the first place?
726
00:32:01,000 --> 00:32:04,042
- If I had to guess as
to what we're looking at,
727
00:32:04,042 --> 00:32:07,542
I think this looks like a
really two-dimensional object
728
00:32:07,542 --> 00:32:11,292
like black plastic that has
been placed on the bottom
729
00:32:11,292 --> 00:32:14,375
of wherever this was taken.
730
00:32:14,375 --> 00:32:15,792
- [Tony] One problem
there though,
731
00:32:15,792 --> 00:32:18,042
some maintain that the figure
in the water is so clear
732
00:32:18,042 --> 00:32:20,583
we'd be able to identify
a piece of plastic
733
00:32:20,583 --> 00:32:22,875
if that's really what this was.
734
00:32:22,875 --> 00:32:24,708
- It's a very clear image,
735
00:32:24,708 --> 00:32:26,917
and the fun thing about it is
736
00:32:26,917 --> 00:32:29,167
your brain can't
quite make it out.
737
00:32:29,167 --> 00:32:31,250
It's hard to tell what
you're looking at,
738
00:32:31,250 --> 00:32:33,875
and that's where a lot
of the mystery comes from
739
00:32:33,875 --> 00:32:35,917
in the Hook Island
sea monster image.
740
00:32:39,625 --> 00:32:43,208
- We're going to call this
an unexplained object.
741
00:32:43,208 --> 00:32:45,542
The evidence still
begets the question,
742
00:32:45,542 --> 00:32:46,875
is this a real sea monster
743
00:32:46,875 --> 00:32:49,000
lurking off the
coast of Australia,
744
00:32:49,000 --> 00:32:51,375
or just another convincing fake?
745
00:32:51,375 --> 00:32:54,000
But this is hardly the
only suspected creature
746
00:32:54,000 --> 00:32:56,042
off Australia's shores.
747
00:32:56,042 --> 00:32:58,583
The country even has its
own Loch Ness monster
748
00:32:58,583 --> 00:33:01,042
called the Hawkesbury monster,
749
00:33:01,042 --> 00:33:05,000
which is believed to be
between 23 and 79 feet long.
750
00:33:05,000 --> 00:33:06,542
So if you're ever in the waters
751
00:33:06,542 --> 00:33:10,458
off the coast of the land
down under, keep an eye out.
752
00:33:14,417 --> 00:33:16,750
- Strange things can happen
when you're on vacation.
753
00:33:16,750 --> 00:33:18,250
Well, at least on my vacations.
754
00:33:18,250 --> 00:33:19,833
And now one couple's
holiday stroll
755
00:33:19,833 --> 00:33:23,875
may have solved a mystery that
dates back to ancient times,
756
00:33:23,875 --> 00:33:26,250
the mystery of the
Loch Ness monster.
757
00:33:27,458 --> 00:33:29,250
April, 2022,
758
00:33:30,083 --> 00:33:31,292
a couple in their fifties
759
00:33:31,292 --> 00:33:33,333
holiday in the
Scottish Highlands.
760
00:33:33,333 --> 00:33:35,208
After waking up early
on a Monday morning
761
00:33:35,208 --> 00:33:36,375
and heading out
with their camera,
762
00:33:36,375 --> 00:33:38,417
the couple is taking
in the eerie sight
763
00:33:38,417 --> 00:33:41,958
of the still waters of Loch
Ness when they record this.
764
00:33:43,042 --> 00:33:44,375
- [Onlooker] What
on earth is there?
765
00:33:44,375 --> 00:33:46,167
- [Tony] Take a closer
look as we zoom in
766
00:33:46,167 --> 00:33:47,708
and sharpen the image.
767
00:33:47,708 --> 00:33:50,458
It looks like a creature
moving through the water.
768
00:33:50,458 --> 00:33:52,667
So admittedly this video
was hard to make out,
769
00:33:52,667 --> 00:33:54,000
but I wanna draw your attention
770
00:33:54,000 --> 00:33:56,208
to a couple of features
that really intrigue us.
771
00:33:56,208 --> 00:33:59,542
First of all, it is this
wake that leads us to believe
772
00:33:59,542 --> 00:34:02,542
that this is actually a creature
moving through the water.
773
00:34:02,542 --> 00:34:07,542
And then this hump right
here is so consistent
774
00:34:08,583 --> 00:34:12,000
with other sightings of
the Loch Ness monster.
775
00:34:12,000 --> 00:34:14,042
- Some researchers
have called this
776
00:34:14,042 --> 00:34:15,583
the most significant footage
777
00:34:15,583 --> 00:34:19,167
to come off Loch Ness
in the last 20 years.
778
00:34:19,167 --> 00:34:22,542
It doesn't seem to have an
artificial or staged quality.
779
00:34:22,542 --> 00:34:24,208
- [Onlooker] Yeah, it's
really pushing forward now.
780
00:34:24,208 --> 00:34:26,375
- [Gerhard] It seems like
whatever they're filming
781
00:34:26,375 --> 00:34:28,375
is actually there in Loch Ness.
782
00:34:28,375 --> 00:34:29,958
- [Tony] The elusive
legendary creature,
783
00:34:29,958 --> 00:34:31,500
affectionately known as Nessie,
784
00:34:31,500 --> 00:34:34,375
has actually had its fair share
of caught on camera moments.
785
00:34:35,625 --> 00:34:37,875
- The first compelling image
of the Loch Ness monster
786
00:34:37,875 --> 00:34:40,708
dates from November of 1933,
787
00:34:41,875 --> 00:34:44,042
and then in April of 1934,
788
00:34:44,042 --> 00:34:47,250
something known as the
surgeon's photo surface.
789
00:34:47,250 --> 00:34:50,542
It appeared to show a
small head, a long neck,
790
00:34:50,542 --> 00:34:53,500
and a hump protruding
out of Loch Ness
791
00:34:53,500 --> 00:34:56,792
and quickly achieved
worldwide fame.
792
00:34:56,792 --> 00:34:59,542
Unfortunately, in the 1990s,
793
00:34:59,542 --> 00:35:03,208
researchers proved that
the surgeon's photo
794
00:35:03,208 --> 00:35:05,167
was in fact a hoax.
795
00:35:05,167 --> 00:35:06,917
- [Narrator] But the sightings
continue to this day.
796
00:35:06,917 --> 00:35:08,208
Nessie is often described
797
00:35:08,208 --> 00:35:10,042
as an aquatic creature
having two humps,
798
00:35:10,042 --> 00:35:11,292
which has led to the theory
799
00:35:11,292 --> 00:35:13,500
that there is a
surviving Plesiosaur
800
00:35:13,500 --> 00:35:15,792
swimming beneath the
surface of the Loch.
801
00:35:15,792 --> 00:35:19,250
- Plesiosaurs were an
archaic marine reptile
802
00:35:19,250 --> 00:35:21,375
that lived alongside
the dinosaurs
803
00:35:21,375 --> 00:35:23,250
up until the end of
the Cretaceous period
804
00:35:23,250 --> 00:35:25,542
about 65 million years ago.
805
00:35:25,542 --> 00:35:27,708
They were about 20
or 30 feet long,
806
00:35:27,708 --> 00:35:30,792
they had a very big
body with a long neck
807
00:35:30,792 --> 00:35:34,958
and a small head, four flippers
and a very powerful tail.
808
00:35:34,958 --> 00:35:36,542
And in some respects,
809
00:35:36,542 --> 00:35:40,417
this does fit some of the
eyewitness accounts of Nessie.
810
00:35:41,792 --> 00:35:43,375
- [Narrator] But Gerhard says
there's a good reason why
811
00:35:43,375 --> 00:35:46,083
many Nessie sightings remain
unexplained to this day.
812
00:35:47,292 --> 00:35:51,792
- Loch Ness is incredibly
deep, up to 754 feet,
813
00:35:53,208 --> 00:35:54,542
and what's really problematic
in terms of research
814
00:35:54,542 --> 00:35:56,375
is that the water is very dark.
815
00:35:57,500 --> 00:35:58,958
- [Narrator] Despite
those challenges,
816
00:35:58,958 --> 00:36:01,083
researchers have managed to
collect compelling evidence
817
00:36:01,083 --> 00:36:03,667
that something is
lurking in the loch.
818
00:36:03,667 --> 00:36:07,292
- Dating back to 1954,
there have been literally
819
00:36:07,292 --> 00:36:10,708
dozens of sonar contacts
with large animate objects
820
00:36:10,708 --> 00:36:14,208
swimming in Loch Ness,
20 to 30 feet long,
821
00:36:14,208 --> 00:36:16,208
usually serpentine in shape.
822
00:36:16,208 --> 00:36:18,542
And as recently as this year,
823
00:36:18,542 --> 00:36:22,167
there was a sonar contact
at a depth of about 500 feet
824
00:36:22,167 --> 00:36:25,833
of a large serpentine
unidentified object,
825
00:36:25,833 --> 00:36:27,958
about 20 to 30 feet long,
826
00:36:27,958 --> 00:36:29,917
further adding to
the body of evidence
827
00:36:29,917 --> 00:36:31,542
that the Loch Ness
monster exists,
828
00:36:35,042 --> 00:36:36,833
- [Narrator] Loch Ness
holds an estimated
829
00:36:36,833 --> 00:36:40,708
263 billion cubic feet of water,
830
00:36:40,708 --> 00:36:43,375
which is more than all the
water in all the lakes,
831
00:36:43,375 --> 00:36:45,208
rivers and reservoirs
832
00:36:45,208 --> 00:36:48,167
in the whole of England
and Wales combined.
833
00:36:48,167 --> 00:36:50,208
So could this video
be the latest proof
834
00:36:50,208 --> 00:36:53,208
that Nessie is
somewhere in there?
835
00:36:53,208 --> 00:36:55,292
We turn to our
experts to find out.
836
00:36:59,583 --> 00:37:03,417
- In terms of authenticity,
nothing appears to be CGI.
837
00:37:03,417 --> 00:37:05,375
The video appears
to be consistent
838
00:37:05,375 --> 00:37:07,542
and plays consistently.
839
00:37:07,542 --> 00:37:09,375
No editing or
splicing was detected.
840
00:37:09,375 --> 00:37:10,750
Through the media interrogation,
841
00:37:10,750 --> 00:37:14,042
digital information
analysis through Medex,
842
00:37:14,042 --> 00:37:16,208
we were able to confirm the
authenticity of this video
843
00:37:16,208 --> 00:37:17,917
and it is genuine.
844
00:37:17,917 --> 00:37:20,792
- [Tony] So if the video is
real, what are we looking at?
845
00:37:20,792 --> 00:37:23,875
- You can actually see based
on the other objects around it
846
00:37:23,875 --> 00:37:27,250
that not only is this animal
moving through the water,
847
00:37:27,250 --> 00:37:28,583
it's actually navigating,
848
00:37:28,583 --> 00:37:31,792
you can see it turn
towards the shoreline.
849
00:37:31,792 --> 00:37:34,542
To me that means it's
not something being towed
850
00:37:34,542 --> 00:37:36,583
or something stuck in the water,
851
00:37:36,583 --> 00:37:39,250
this is actually a
really large animal,
852
00:37:39,250 --> 00:37:42,333
I think moving across
the surface of Loch Ness.
853
00:37:43,375 --> 00:37:44,542
- [Tony] So could a dinosaur
854
00:37:44,542 --> 00:37:46,875
thought to be extinct
for 65 million years
855
00:37:46,875 --> 00:37:50,208
really survive in the frigid
murky waters of Loch Ness?
856
00:37:50,208 --> 00:37:54,333
- Plesiosaurs did actually
inhabit this area,
857
00:37:54,333 --> 00:37:56,750
but Plesiosaur were
known to be very large,
858
00:37:56,750 --> 00:37:58,208
voracious predators.
859
00:37:58,208 --> 00:38:00,583
So there would have
to be a lot of food
860
00:38:00,583 --> 00:38:02,833
to support a remnant dinosaur.
861
00:38:02,833 --> 00:38:06,917
It would be very difficult for
an animal like a plesiosaur
862
00:38:06,917 --> 00:38:08,875
to obtain enough food,
863
00:38:08,875 --> 00:38:12,708
so I can rule out that this is
some sort of living dinosaur.
864
00:38:12,708 --> 00:38:14,458
- [Tony] Furthermore,
Steingass says that
865
00:38:14,458 --> 00:38:16,000
in one of our
biggest DNA studies
866
00:38:16,000 --> 00:38:18,833
of its kind scientists from
New Zealand's Otago University,
867
00:38:18,833 --> 00:38:22,417
were able to identify the
presence of around 3000 species
868
00:38:22,417 --> 00:38:25,208
in the deep dark
waters of Loch Ness.
869
00:38:25,208 --> 00:38:27,625
- This 2019 study actually
870
00:38:27,625 --> 00:38:31,417
ruled out the idea of some
Plesiosaur living in Loch Ness
871
00:38:31,417 --> 00:38:33,292
because there was
no genetic material
872
00:38:33,292 --> 00:38:35,625
associated with
that that was found.
873
00:38:35,625 --> 00:38:37,542
- [Tony] DNA from
Whales and Dolphins
874
00:38:37,542 --> 00:38:40,042
was also identified in Loch
Ness by the researchers.
875
00:38:40,042 --> 00:38:41,792
Steingass rules
those out though,
876
00:38:41,792 --> 00:38:44,917
because you can't see a
dorsal fin in the video,
877
00:38:44,917 --> 00:38:46,708
but she does have one guess.
878
00:38:46,708 --> 00:38:50,542
- The EDNA study actually
showed a lot of eel DNA
879
00:38:50,542 --> 00:38:53,958
in Loch Ness, and this
brings the possibility
880
00:38:53,958 --> 00:38:55,875
that maybe the Loch Ness monster
881
00:38:55,875 --> 00:39:00,708
is actually just a large eel
being sighted at the surface.
882
00:39:02,083 --> 00:39:03,708
- [Tony] If it is
an eel, it's huge,
883
00:39:03,708 --> 00:39:06,000
which is fascinating in itself.
884
00:39:06,000 --> 00:39:08,667
- There's still a
mystery that's going on
885
00:39:08,667 --> 00:39:11,583
and we're not really sure what
we're seeing in Loch Ness.
886
00:39:17,833 --> 00:39:19,000
- Our verdict?
887
00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:22,042
We're going to say this is
possibly a gigantic eel,
888
00:39:22,042 --> 00:39:24,917
though we can't say for
certain what species.
889
00:39:24,917 --> 00:39:27,750
Perhaps one that hasn't
been discovered yet.
890
00:39:27,750 --> 00:39:29,792
But the mystery is
far from solved,
891
00:39:29,792 --> 00:39:33,042
so we'll keep our eyes
peeled for more evidence.
892
00:39:33,042 --> 00:39:36,417
We've only scratched the
surface of what lies beneath.
893
00:39:36,417 --> 00:39:38,250
Our team will continue
to investigate
894
00:39:38,250 --> 00:39:40,125
mysterious underwater creatures
895
00:39:40,125 --> 00:39:44,792
that blur the lines between
myth, science and reality.
896
00:39:44,792 --> 00:39:45,958
The deeper we go,
897
00:39:45,958 --> 00:39:49,042
the more we realize how
little we truly know.
898
00:39:49,042 --> 00:39:51,375
Thank you for watching
this special edition
899
00:39:51,375 --> 00:39:52,667
of The Proof Is Out There.
900
00:39:52,667 --> 00:39:54,792
Please send us any
video, images or sound
901
00:39:54,792 --> 00:39:56,417
that you think we
should investigate
902
00:39:56,417 --> 00:39:59,292
and remember to keep
those cameras rolling.
903
00:39:59,292 --> 00:40:01,875
[upbeat music]
72358
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.