All language subtitles for Deadliest warrior s02e12 Comanche vs. Mongol

The Comanches, the born -in -the -saddle
killers who terrorized the 18th century

American plains.

The Mongols, the vicious Asian horse
warriors who used pure savagery to

conquer more territory in the 13th
century than any empire in history.

Who is deadliest?

To find out, our world -class fighters
are testing history's most lethal

Using 21st century science, we'll see
what happens when the two warriors go

-to -toe.

No rules, no safety, no mercy.

It's a duel to the death to decide who
is the deadliest warrior.

Inside this high -tech battle zone,
we're out to rewrite history.

Here, a team of scientists, trauma
doctors, and weapons combat specialists

will test the lethal arsenals of two of
the fiercest horse warriors of all time.

The Comanches, the Native American
hunters known as Lords of the Southern

Plains, who ferociously defended their
territory by slaying anyone who dared to

settle on the same land.

Such as the Mongols.

The fierce East Asian warriors, obsessed
with conquering the world, who used

mass murder to annihilate entire
civilizations.

Computer whiz Max Geiger will run the
simulation that will put these warriors

the same battlefield.

These are two fearsome warriors,
renowned for their ability to fight from

horseback, renowned for their use of the
bow, renowned for their hit -and -run

passion.

Lead biomedical scientist Jeff Damelin
will tailor his weapons testing

to the special skills of these warriors.

Comanche versus Mongo, we've got bow and
arrows. That means the crony is going

to get the release velocity off those
bow and arrows. Plus, we've got a lot of

guys delivering weapons from horseback.

The opposition, Armand Dorian, will
examine the gruesome injuries.

I'm going to be telling you who's going
to maim the other guy and who's actually

going to kill the other guy. And that's
very important to know when you have two

expert warriors.

Test data will be loaded into the
simulator, which will generate a one -on

battle to the death.

The winner will be the deadliest
warrior.

Fighting for his Comanche ancestors.

expert equestrian Joaquin Gonzalez.

As part of his Comanche heritage,
Joaquin learned to ride before he could

and is an expert at deploying weapons
from horseback.

Comanches have no fear. We don't know
who you are. We don't care who you are.

We're just here to let you know we ain't
going anywhere.

Also wielding the Comanche weapon, Che
Redhawk.

Che is a master horse archer.

who makes his living handcrafting
powerful bows and arrows.

From the time we are born, we hit the
earth, we're warriors.

When Columbus discovered the New World
in 1492, more than 10 million Native

Americans already inhabited the
continent.

There were hundreds of diverse, often
warring tribes.

But Comanches did not yet exist.

In the 1600s, After the Spanish brought
horses to the Americas, a renegade band

of the Shoshone tribe discovered their
deadly advantage of hunting and fighting

from horseback.

They broke off from their mother tribe
in Wyoming and headed south in conquest.

And the Comanche warrior was born.

The Comanche controlled an expanse from
Kansas to southern Texas and were

masters of the American plains,
ferociously defending their territory

Apaches and early Spanish settlers.

We are here for a purpose, not to
protect our land, protect our family, to

protect our hunting grounds. That's it.

Comanche fought their toughest opponents
in the 1800s in a half -century

struggle known as the Texas Indian Wars.

The Comanches were very fierce and very
brutal against any intruders. It was not

free. The Comanches were never overrun.
We were never defeated.

We still have our way of life, and that
will never be taken away.

The Comanche team is confident of
victory.

But so are their opponents, experts on
the infamous Mongols.

Mongolian native, Montur Lusenjamba.

a former horse racer, and also a skilled
archer.

In Mongolian, we have a saying, Also

fighting for the Mongols,

Jason wins.

Jason is a nationally ranked broadsword
specialist and an expert on ancient

Asian combat.

The Mongols have a mission to conquer
everything.

dominate everything in our path, destroy
everything in our path.

In the 13th century, under the
leadership of Genghis Khan and his

the Mongols stormed across Asia and
conquered a territory more than four

the size of the continental United
States, from the Korean peninsula to

Europe. The enemies of the Mongols had
two choices, die or bow to the hand.

There are certain civilizations that
would have bowed down to the Khan.

We wiped them from history.

Atop the smaller, more maneuverable
Mongolian horse, an arm with devastating

steel weapons, the Mongol army killed
more than 40 million people.

They were considered the worst mass
murderers in history.

We don't take from anybody.

In a one -on -one battle between two of
the greatest horse warriors in history,

who will take the victory?

When I think Mongols, I think of
warriors that actually designed their

I think of Comanches, I think of guys
that pick up rocks and sharpen them into

weapons. Not the ideal thing. I'm giving
my initial edge to the Mongols.

My edge here goes to the Comanche. These
guys were great with their bow and

arrow. They reigned the plains.

They were great one -on -one fighters.

Kind of makes sense.

The Comanches kick off the showdown with
a mid -range weapon that could impale a

man in a single thrust.

The war lance.

The perfect skewer.

For a human target.

Eight feet long, it's made out of a hard
wood.

It varies in weight, anywhere from five
to nine or ten pounds.

The great thing about these is because
of the length, it can be made to pierce,

lop it in half.

So you're saying you're not only going
to stab with this, you can slash with it

as well? You can just swing it left and
right and just keep an eight foot.

Circle all the way around you. The
Tonkawa tribe and many other tribes were

completely wiped off the face of the
earth by the Comanche warrior using the

lance. Well, I want to test this. We've
got three targets set up over here, two

on foot. The third target is mounted.

Ballistics gel torso mimicking real
human tissue.

I'm going to measure the accuracy you
have with this weapon from horseback.

Let's get started.

Cruising, man.

Cruising.

40 miles per hour. Point of impact, man.

Let's take a look at the first shot
right here.

Exactly where you want to deliver that
blow. Right into the bottom of that

heart. That is a kill.

Let's move on to the next target.

Again, a beautifully placed shot,
another demonstrated kill shot.

It's almost the identical location you
got on the first target. You're

demonstrating consistency.

This is why sometimes my job does get
easy. When you have a great warrior who

knows what he's doing with his weapon, a
consistent strike, very similar

location. Let's actually see how deep
this actually does go.

Oh, there it is.

So, I mean, there is no question the tip
is hitting the spine.

So this is an instant kill. Jason, are
you worried about this? Got two things

say. One, Mongols are always moving.
Two, we got armor. Let's test it.

A Mongol chest plate of hardened leather
is placed onto the ballistics gel

torso. Rukin, are you ready?

Didn't look like it'd make any
difference at all.

What you've done here, I mean, this time
the penetration's even further, all the

way to the base. We're talking 10, 11
inches here. He's a little lower than

before, but actually just as good.
Another instant kill. Dead mongrel.

Pretty good for a pool stick.

A pool stick that kills.

Props to you, Comanche.

But the Mongols got something bigger
than that.

Coming up, the Mongols strike back with
their own killer pull -off.

Comanche or Mongol?

Who will be that deadly warrior?

Ruthless Native American Comanche or the
power -hungry Mongol?

Experts on two of history's most
bloodthirsty mounted slayers believe

will prevail due to differences in
training and tactics.

Comanches are primitive.

They have no armies, no structure. They
fight with sticks and stones. Compared

to Mongol Empire, we have rigorous
training.

Comanches don't step up to fight against
organized armies like the Mongols.

While Mongols conquered with armies,

Comanches fought in smaller bands of 10
to 20 men.

The Mongols have to fight as a giant
unit.

They're going to kick up so much dust,
we're going to see them from 100 miles

away.

Come in quietly, as fast as possible. By
the time the dust settles, you're

already dead.

I command you will launch his assault
with a bow and arrow, the war lance, the

war hawk, and the scalping knife.

The Mongol is equipped with his own bow
and arrow, the glaive.

the flanged mace, and the yielded short
sword.

Team Comanche has already proven their
war lantern's killing capacity from

horseback.

But the Mongols had a longer -bladed
weapon designed to counter such an

Theirs could not only slaughter a man on
foot, but was crafted to cut a mounted

warrior off his horse.

The Glaive.

A limb lopper to kill man or beast.

I have a Mongolian glaive.

We call it also jat in Mongolian. Two
and a half feet long.

Third, mounted on the five feet long.

Shift. The blade is actually an
extension to the handle butt right here.

And it's bounded by a spike nailed into
here.

So it's very similar to a modern -day
knife design then.

Right. This is a very effective and
deadly weapon.

On foot, we're able to chop off the
horse's legs, the horse themselves, and

rider. It's primarily a demounter. I
mean, essentially a horse cutter. You're

right. A demounter.

I think we've got something that will
pull it to the test.

The target, a side of beef.

Suspended on a zip line to move as fast
as a charging horse.

Bunker, are you ready?

Yes!

Three, two, one, drop the beat!

Yeah!

Okay, Bunker, I clocked that thrust 32
miles per hour, okay?

That's actually 8 miles per hour slower
than the Comanche War Lance, but...

What kind of damage did we do? Okay, he
went between the ribs, boom, right into

the midsection, straight through the
heart, straight through the lungs. The

thrust would be a complete instant kill
of the horse.

And what I like about this weapon is the
fact that you don't have to use a lot

of your energy. You use the energy and
the mass of the horse against itself.

But I got to ask, we saw with the
Comanche War Lance, it can be used on

horseback. And on foot. And while you've
demonstrated here, it's very effective

on foot. Can it be used on horseback?

We don't use it on horseback. This is
specifically designed to take down

cowboys. If I saw you on foot with a
blade, I guarantee you wouldn't even get

that close to get to me. That blade
would not touch my horse.

I guarantee it. You're facing three foot
of blade, and it's metal into that.

Which weapon gives his warrior an edge?

I like the length of the Mongol glaive,
but I like the options that the war

lance brings.

I love the fact that the war lance
actually can be used from horse and from

foot. The weapon that can be used from
the horse wins in this case.

For medium -range weapons, the edge goes
to the Comanche for the war lance.

For Comanche, the war lance was just one
piece of a tradition.

designed to forge all boys into
warriors.

By the time we're three or four, we're
already on horseback.

By the time we're five or six, we're
already a master at shooting the bow and

arrow.

As Comanche warriors, you know, we grew
up hunting.

We're dealing with two -ton buffalo, so
that's where we learn our skills.

This enabled them to learn accuracy,
where to hit the buffalo for a kill

What the Comanche learned on the hunting
grounds as children is what we take

into our adulthood as warriors on the
battlefield.

In contrast, Mongol training instilled
an ability to constantly adopt new

fighting methods.

based on those whom they'd conquered.

To expand your civilization, you have to
learn new technology. Learn from other

civilizations. Adapt.

For instance, the Persians.

We've adopted their weapons, learned
everything about them, and used their

tactics in battle and warfare.

The Manchus have no goal, no mission.
They just want to protect their pasture,

their horses, their teepees, nothing.

The Mongols, we have a goal, a lifelong
career.

Destroy everything in our path.

Coming up, the two warriors go head -to
-head with their signature weapons.

Comanche or Mongol, only one can be that
deadliest warrior.

Back at the fight club, our experts
ready the weapons of two of history's

greatest mounted warriors.

The Mongol, a fiercely devoted soldier.

whose murderous rampages were powered by
an incredible offensive onslaught.

Mongols were geared towards warfare.

Keep, sleep, breathe, warfare, 24 -6.

Versus the Comanche, who defended his
sacred homeland with guerrilla -style

attacks and deadly deception.

Comanches were very fierce warriors.
Their whole survival and their

as a fierce tribe depended on not being
able to be captured or killed.

Surrendering was not an option.

That fierce spirit was backed up by the
primary weapon the Comanches staked

their lives on.

Even when guns became available to them,
these warriors preferred to fire the

Comanche bow and arrow.

Powerful enough to punch a hole clean
through a 2 ,000 -pound buffalo.

This, by far, would be the weapon most
used by a Comanche warrior.

This is a D -style bow.

It's got a short draw, which is designed
for you to use your muscle groups

effectively. The hair at the top, it's
horsehair, but it's not just for

decoration. When it's windy, this is
your gauge. Ah, I told you where the

is. That's correct. Just like modern
-day snipers with their flags.

Exactly. Plus, I would imagine, you
know, the horse's head gets in the way,

right? You can't be down here. You've
got to be somewhere like that, right?

That's correct. And this is why this bow
is so short.

Maneuverability. I can go this way if I
have to. I can go this way, this way. I

can turn around.

Maneuverable off a horseback, and it's
deadly.

But the Mongol arsenal has a matching
weapon.

with a range equal to two football
fields.

The Mongol bow.

The greatest long -range killer of its
day.

This here is a traditional Mongol bow.
It's fairly light. Typically, we shoot

with barbed arrows, fire arrows, and
sometimes explosive arrows.

How about this design? Is there anything
significant about this design?

This design is symbolizing victory.

Make the war over, and victory is our
fight.

To measure the skills of our two archers
and their distinct bows, Jeff will

first measure the arrow speed each
warrior generates.

This here is chronometer.

It's the release velocity of that bow.
Jason, you're up first.

Okay.

Nice.

142 .9 feet per second.

Jay, you're up next.

Woo!

155 .6 feet per second.

Translated to miles per hour, it's 105
miles per hour.

Jason, yours translated to 97 miles per
hour. Nice work, but I've got to see

these on horseback, so let's head out to
the range.

Comanche expert fired a faster arrow,
but which warrior is more accurate from

horseback?

Warriors, we're going to do a head -to
-head bow and arrow challenge.

Jeff has set up seven targets, five of
them moving.

You'll be on the clock, and you'll each
have three chances to pass through these

targets. Use as many arrows as you need
to take as many targets down.

You guys ready to get this going?

We're ready. Let's do it.

Ready on the timer for Red Hawk?

Red Hawk, you ready?

using black arrows, had five strikes in
33 seconds.

The Comanches, with their red arrows,
six hits in just 28 seconds.

Okay, so more hits and a faster time for
the Comanche, but were there more

kills? Well, let's take a look at
Comanche's first hit.

Looks like he's hitting right at the
shoulder, missing midsection of the

Definitely going to incapacitate that
armor. This is not a kill.

Moving targets.

Beautiful. Okay, let's start with the
Comanche again.

This is an instant kill shot through the
windpipe hitting the carotid, but this

one was done by the Mongol. This is
going dead mid -chest.

This is also a kill shot.

Next target.

We've got two shots here, both of which
were delivered at the same time by the

Comanche, which was really cool.

One goes right underneath the clavicle,
right through, collapsing the left

chest, causing a kill. The other one,
however, would not kill. It would hit

shoulder.

Okay, we've got two black arrows from
the Mongols.

This by itself would not kill, but it
would definitely collapse the lung. He's

hitting the right chest.

Couple that with another shot, which
would probably nick the lung and also

increased breathing. This would kill,
but it would be a delayed kill. So I

this two arrows, one kill. All right,
let's move on to these guys. Okay, we've

got our red arrow again from the
Comanche right in the belly, just

the spleen.

This, however, is not an instant kill,
but a sure bet to actually kill.

Next guy from the Mongols.

This is an interesting shot. It's going
right underneath the clavicle. Not an

instant kill, but it's a mortal wound.

Another command hero.

Again, right in the midsection, the
chest.

This would drop along, so I would count
this as a delayed kill.

This, I think, is the best play shot of
the day. This is going straight dead

into the heart. There is no question.
This is an instant kill.

Okay, so let's run the numbers then.

Six hits for the Comanches, five hits
for the Mongols, four for four kills on

either side, but this one comes down to
the overall time.

28 seconds for the Comanche versus 33
seconds for the Mongol. Comanche takes

this one, but nice work on both sides,
guys.

Long -range weapons, the edge goes to
the Comanches for the bow and arrow.

Coming up, the Mongols slash back while
the Comanches attempt to carve out their

victory.

The world's deadliest mounted warrior
fought their battle 600 years apart.

But if they actually met in the combat
zone, which fighter would slay the

The Comanche or the Mongol? When you
combine the horsemanship skills, the bow

skills, the lance skills, that makes the
Comanche the deadliest warrior.

The Comanche guys are good at talking.

The Mongols are good at killing.

The Mongols proved their deadliness with
a brutal sword able to clean fatal

wounds.

The Ild.

Capable of hacking an enemy to pieces
with a flick of the wrist.

This is a Mongol sword, the Ild. 24
inches long, single -sided blade, weighs

about two, three quarters pounds, and is
made from early steel.

We use it for both foot fighting on the
horseback. So we swing it on the right

side. And this side, I'm cutting off
enemy's head in a second. Or I can just

directly punch to the enemy's heart.

And he's dead.

There's the killing force of the Mongol
Ild. It will go against a pig target

with similar resistance to human flesh.

So we've got our orientation sensor.

I'll attach that onto your wrist and the
weapon itself.

We'll get the impact speed of that
weapon.

Good to go. All right. Get out of my
way.

Jason, man.

Two -handed weapon with that length on
it. I got 67 miles per hour on that. We

wanted trauma, and you definitely
brought trauma.

You went straight through the muscle,
straight through the bone, and then

get into the greater vessels. If you can
get that deep and down with a slashing

kind of a cut, it's an instant kill.

Well, you know, if you're hacking a tied
-up pig, it was an impressive

demonstration.

But on horseback, you have to be able to
hit a Comanche warrior to do damage,

and that's not easy.

We fight like men, not like butchers.
We're up close and brutal.

Comanche warriors turned enemies into
trophies.

With a deadly razor -sharp blade of
terror.

The scalping knife.

Invisible one second, lethal the next.

It's quick to wield and get right in
there. I mean, you're not going to see

coming. You'll get, you know, 5, 10, 20
jab.

Again, you can get close to the face and
anywhere else in the body. I mean,

there is no safe place.

This is my personal knife. I do have a
great grip with this deer bone handle.

don't need a long blade. To be quiet and
fast, that's what we want.

A magic knife can easily scalp a downed
man.

Can such a small blade kill?

So just as with the Mongol Ild, you guys
will be stabbing against this pig

carcass. Pig flesh is a very good
stimulant for human flesh, and pig is

rough, gross anatomy as a human being.

Because this weapon is so short, I'm
actually going to strap on an

onto your wrist so we'll get hand speed
as you strike in on this pig.

Three, two, one.

where to begin there's about a hundred
strikes on this pig up here you actually

did it one clean strike right through
the neck that would basically go

through the carotid or the jugulars and
would be a kill in and of itself all of

these strikes in and of themselves would
not kill but here's the important

factor you would collapse a lung if you
were able to then flip around and strike

on this side which you did

Two lungs collapsed is death. But if
you're not hitting right into that heart

right into that neck carotid artery,
you're going to need more than one

So your speed has to be twice as fast as
the ILD. The only thing that's going to

be able to get beyond the ILD's reach is
that speed. You've got to be quicker

than the Mongol. I mean, how fast is
this? I got 45 feet per second, which is

roughly 30 miles per hour. Now,
comparing that number to the 67 miles

we saw with the Mongol's sword, it's
slower.

But hand speed for hand speed.

You're quicker.

So if you can't get inside his range, I
think you can get the job done.

That was slow and weak and nothing but
flesh wounds right there.

You took too long to kill him.

I thought about killing. It's about
getting in and out, in and out. Why you

still got your sword up here? We're in
and out. And then you're like hunched

over crying.

We have range.

You're done.

We decapitate you. I guess we're going
to find out, aren't we?

With radically different blades.

Which warrior gets the edge for special
weapons?

The scalping knife is very, very
effective, but you've got to get in

the Ild is just not going to let that
happen.

Edge, Ild. For special weapons, the edge
goes to the Mongols for the Ild.

Coming up, the battle moves in close for
a bloody finish.

Comanche or Mongol?

Who will be the deadliest warrior?

Native American Comanche versus 13th
century Asian Mongol.

In a one -on -one battle between these
murderous horsemen, who would win?

Mongol experts are convinced their
warrior has intimidation on his side.

The Mongols like to instill fear in the
hearts of their enemies.

We do kill everything on our path, but
we do leave one to tell the tale and let

the fear spread.

Comanche experts think their warrior's
advantage lies in his intense

For their survival as a Southern Plains
tribe, they had to be successful in

their raids to hold that dominant
position.

The worst thing that could happen to a
Comanche is to come back defeated.

The Comanches would rather die in battle
than come home disgraced, bottom line.

The Comanches weren't afraid to get
close to their enemies.

And at short range, they had a weapon
with extreme power.

The Warhawk.

Delivering death with one swing.

This here is the Comanche Warhawk. Like
all Comanche weapons, it's light and

easy to carry in the battle. And it
definitely has a purpose, and that's

maim and to kill.

Definitely is light and you definitely
have enough penetrating power here to

kill. But what's the deal with all these
feathers?

If a warrior is coming at you and all
you see is feathers flying around,

not going to see the blade coming at you
at all. It's going to basically

disorient you.

This is a weapon that's also easy to
just sling on your back and you can ride

50, 60, 100 mile day with that. But when
you're dismounted, how do you use it?

Well, that's what's great about this
because you may have a sharp blade on

end, but you have a blunt end on the
other.

So this basically is unbeatable on a
horse or off a horse.

The Mongol experts are not impressed.

You're talking about a stick and a
spike. The Mongolians have a solid piece

metal that could cause a train wreck and
destroy anything in its path.

The plan's to mate.

Nicknamed the mutt.

This is probably the mutual.

Very effective killing, enemies hitting
on the enemy's head with the deep

impact. You've got these flanges here
that increases the point of contact,

leads to more damage. But in order to
decrease the time between each strike,

you've got to keep that weapon moving.
It tends to be a lot of work for the

warrior. Are you worried about that?
This is the weapon for the powerful

Mongolian warrior, not the weak in
France.

Compare both warrior clubs.

A head -to -head test will measure their
impact force on three skull targets.

We've got our tech scan pressure mat on
top of the first skull.

That will give me the pressure of your
weapons and the load that comes down on

man's head.

You're going to be on the clock.

Joaquin, you're up first on my goal.

Let's get the high -speed lights up!

Joaquin, you ready?

Yeah, giblets.

Giblets, baby. There you go.

Yeah.

How devastating was the war hawk's
impact?

Let's start with this skull first.

You took that spike and you drove it
directly down to the skull, into the

Now I know exactly why you guys put that
iron spike at the tip. It jumps the PSI

up to over 300.

It only takes about 81 PSI to actually
fracture the skull.

It's an instant kill. When we move over
to this guy here...

I mean, this guy's half the head he used
to be.

You actually fractured through the face,
and then you take that spike, and you

jam it up through the side of the head
into the brain.

Guarantee killed.

And with your second skull, you had a
little bit of difficulty because you

actually got that thing stuck in the
head, which obviously ensures a kill.

But whenever you go through something as
dense as skull, sometimes it becomes

difficult to jiggle out.

If you have this kind of trouble in the
real battlefield,

You will lose it to victory, okay?

Well, all right, it's quick, it's light,
it's effective. Well, it's quick except

for when it gets stuck.

But I want to see what our Mongol
warriors bring.

Monctur will wield that flanged mace for
the Mongols.

Monctur, are you ready?

Yeah.

True definition of skull snap, skull
crackle, and skull pop.

Yeah, doctor!

There's nothing left.

So you guys have seen my mitt, right? I
have seen your mace, and I am afraid, my

friend. I am very afraid.

I'm getting over 300 PSI, over 250
pounds, coming down this guy's head.

The overall time to take out these three
targets is 16 seconds. as compared to

32 seconds with the Warhawk.

Even if this guy had a super helmet on,
did you see the torque on that neck? I

mean, this would kill regardless of
whether he gets in the skull or not.

seen one -ounce slugs to the head. It
leaves an identifiable skull. There's

nothing left here.

The witch bludgeoning weapon takes the
edge.

The mace, it's like a wrecking ball.

And it doesn't even matter if you hit
the head. You hit that on any part of

body, it's going to cause severe trauma.

It's incredible killing power, and the
fact that it doesn't get stuck, like we

saw with the Warhawk, is why I'm giving
my edge to the Mace.

For close -range weapons, it's a
unanimous edge to the Mongols for the

With the testing complete, only one
question remains.

I think the game actually got a lot
closer than I expected, but the Ilk and

Mace are just too powerful for the
Comanche to deal with. So I got to go

the Mongols.

After seeing all these tests, I'm
actually going to change my mind from

to Comanche. Why?

Better long -range weapon, more
effective medium -range weapon, and

to make the difference in the sim.

Coming up, Comanche, Mongol.

The battle begins.

Our experts have run their final test on
the Comanche and Mongol lethal

arsenals.

Now we're about to find out which of our
warriors is deadliest.

In long -range weapons, we pitted the
Comanche and the Mongols' bows and

head -to -head.

What did we see?

More hits with the Comanche, same number
of kills, but at a faster rate of time.

Edge. Comanche.

Mid -range weapons, the Mongol Glaive,
went up against the Comanche War Lance.

The War Lance was effective in every
aspect of its game. The accuracy which

demonstrated that War Lance was
unbeatable.

Edge, Comanche.

In close -range weapons, the Comanche
Warhawk competed against the Mongol

Warhawk. Very high pressure, but you've
got to hit with the point. There's

absolutely no follow -through. The mace,
just as high pressure and a lot of

follow -through.

Edge Mongol.

Finally, for special weapons, the
Comanche Scalping Knife slashed it out

the Mongol's short sword, the Ilt.
There's no comparison here. The Ilt was

unbelievable.

Edge Mongol.

To prevent the showdown from being won
by a single lucky blow, the battle will

be run 1 ,000 times in a simulation
program developed by Slytherin Studios.

Who is the deadliest warrior, Manchin or
Monk?

You're it.

Come on.

After a thousand battles, our Comanches
prevailed with 528 kills for our

Mongols' 472.

The Mongols were actually very effective
killers.

They were able to maintain over 100
kills in just about every single reign.

the Comanches' ability to hit a little
bit harder with that bow and a little

harder with that lance meant he
eventually carried the day.

It's impossible among those lot. We
ruled half the world.

I had no doubt at all that the Comanches
were by far the deadliest warrior.