All language subtitles for Asymmetric Disclosure

- You are either on the side of the law or you're not.

And if not, which we can prove they are.

You strip 'em of all that cover.

- The only way you're gonna get to it

is somebody at that executive level that says,

enough is enough, cut the money off.

Bring these people in, let's go.

- Maybe just give him a threat, a very light threat.

Let them know like,

this is not to be talked about any further.

And if you do, something can happen.

(gunshots)

- Donald Trump was nearly assassinated.

Are they trying to hide the proof from him?

Is he gonna be the new disclosure president?

- All we need is one to be accurate.

And this whole concept of
UFO crash retrieval, nonexisting

completely falls apart.

- They're doing stuff for spite.

They're doing stuff to protect certain individuals

or certain industries, and
it's detrimental to all of us.

(upbeat music)

- [Reporter] We are back with a Fox News alert.

We're waiting to see how Israel responds

to Iran's unprecedented attack this weekend.

The IDF says, "This launch of so many missiles,

cruise missiles and UAVs into the territory

of the state of Israel will be met with a response."

- We're at the brink of World War III,

just in case anybody doesn't know it.

- Oh yeah, people are all talking about World War III

and all that.

Well, you know, if we don't
change the trajectory we're on,

we're gonna be in a big problem.

And the biggest one

is the fact that there are covert programs

targeting ET vehicles.

And those programs are
jeopardizing the earth for sure.

- [Reporter] The US military shooting down

a fourth unidentified high altitude object Sunday.

- The military needs to have a plan

to not only determine what's out there,

but determine the dangers that go with it.

- We've warned this for over 30 years.

Verna von Brown warned about it.

And you know, since I spoke with you last,

I was at two Western black
sites where they have operations

that are actively targeting
and in a sense, hijacking

ET vehicles with some very high tech systems,

and then moving them into
an area where they're struck

with electromagnetic pulse, Scalar weapons.

And this one site I was
over in a classified aerospace

in September, on average,

knocks about two of these ET crafts down per year.

- [Reporter] President Biden ordering the take down

after military officials raised concerns

about the object's path and altitude,

saying it was a safety flight hazard

and a threat due to its
potential surveillance capabilities.

- So when we tell people

there are 125 crash retrieval
operations that have happened,

we know that's the tip of the iceberg.

It's certainly well over 1,000.

- Mr. Scharatt.

- Good to see you.

- Good seeing ya.

- Good to see you.

- You know, there's a lot of to talk about.

The whistleblowers have spoken.

Apparently more whistleblowers
are gonna be coming forward.

Do you think this is a good start?

- Very good start, very good start.

- You know, with some of the testimony

coming from these whistleblowers,
it's quite controversial.

What do you think?

Do you think people actually are taking these words

as genuine from these people?

- Well, you can see that the giggle factor

is slowly eroding at this point.

And that's the direction we wanna head.

- So late last year, the National Press Club,

we had the hearings in DC,

What is it gonna take for
Washington to finally wake up,

get disclosure to the public,

or at least admit that there's something going on,

or at least we're not alone?

When are they gonna give us word?

- We've gotta up the game.

We've gotta get the physical evidence,

and that's what's gonna break it.

- Physical evidence.

Dr. Greer talks about physical evidence.

A lot of it has been suppressed.

People have been taken out

due to the fact that they
wanna keep all of this a secret.

What kind of chance do we have now

if we're gonna have people that come forward

risk their lives to bring the evidence to the people?

- Right, just to follow up.

So what we wanna do now is identify the last

of the surviving legacy
witnesses to the crash retrievals,

that can lead us to not only the debris and the bodies

but the crafts themselves.

Anything less than that, we're spinning our wheels.

- You could lead us straight
to where these vehicles are at.

- Technically, yes, technically yes.

- How many crash retrievals are you aware of here,

just in the United States alone?

- Well, within the United States, minimum of 119

at probably 126 to 127 now.

And that doesn't include the foreign cases.

- Why it's taking so long to,
number one, for me personally,

to identify these objects.

Two, why is it taking so long for them to be shot down?

- With this kind of level of
shoot downs and retrievals,

where do they keep these assets?

- Sure, well, they spread their assets around.

They diversify their portfolio.

They're not gonna put all their eggs in one basket.

So you've got Edwards North base complex,

you've got MacDill Air Force Base,

you've got Homestead Air
Force Base, Eglin air Force Base.

These are some of the key areas
where they would keep these.

- Recently, Tim Burchett,

congressman Tim Burchett was denied access.

- We've had a heck of a lot of
pushback about this hearing.

We've had members of Congress who fought us.

We've had members of the intelligence community

and also the Pentagon, even NASA backed out on us.

There are a lot of people

who don't want this to come to light.

- How come our congressmen don't even have access

to some of this information?

- That's the brick wall we're running up to,

is because a lot of these senators and congressmen,

they don't have a need to know,

and they have not been read into these programs.

And so, that's what we're running up against.

- This is ridiculous, folks.

They either, they do exist or they don't exist.

They keep telling us they don't exist,

but they block every opportunity

for us to get ahold of the information.

- And so, the people who are currently coming forward

as whistleblowers that are deep in the system,

I mean actively in the system, they totally think

that this is gonna reach a point of it's outta control.

- There seems to be a real
concern about whistleblowers

and whether they'll be
killed or potentially injured

from the information that they bring forward.

If you look at what happened, even with NASA,

over the course of a decade,

several hundred NASA
employees either vanished or died,

and that just got swept underneath the rug.

I mean, articles are there if you look them up

on mainstream sites.

But how come nobody's talking about

all these incredible accidents that are happening

with NASA employees?

It's kind of a hazardous job, right?

Who would wanna work there?

So there's something going on with the government,

and disclosure, and whistleblowers.

Now, some whistleblowers are kind of,

they seem like they're almost
open and free to come out

and admit what they saw or what they know.

And it almost seems as if nothing happens to them.

Sometimes I think some of them get so popular so fast

that if you attack them or you kill them,

it almost kind of makes 'em a martyr.

So it's like, oh, we gotta leave this one alone

because then they're gonna really believe it's true.

And then there are some that try to come out

for whatever reason, through private corporations

or see things in private corporations

that are running black budget projects,

that are running with no congressional oversight.

And then those people tend to sometimes disappear

or attempts are made on their lives

or their loved ones lives.

So you have this combination.

It kind of almost depends

which faction of the government is involved,

which corporation is involved,
and how dubious they are.

You know, it's really a crapshoot.

A person that's gonna come forward

doesn't know if they'll survive it or not.

- You know, while there are
all the geopolitical problems

with Ukraine and Russia, and Taiwan and China,

and of course Middle East,
where I lived for three years,

by the way, this is the bigger issue

that no one's talking about.

And that is unsupervised operations

that have extremely advanced technologies

that neither the president

nor the Congress have any
real knowledge of or control over.

And that is a fact.

And so that is the biggest risk to earth,

is what these illegal, covert
human projects are doing.

Because when we become an existential threat

to other places out in space,

even though these
civilizations aren't hostile per se,

they're also not stupid

and they're not gonna let this continue

on the trajectory it's been on for 80 years.

And I know that the ET civilizations are,

quote unquote, "Fed up."

- One of the problems
associated with alien technology,

if it's real, if we can produce electricity

without burning fossil fuels, or nuke, or wind power,

or whatever, you're not going
to gut a multi-trillion dollar

worldwide industry, fossil fuels.

If all of a sudden we didn't need any of that,

we had unlimited energy free, pollution free

I think the governments and the the billionaires

would fight at tooth and nail

because that is their livelihood.

They don't care what we're paying for gas

or what we're paying for electricity,

they're in a totally different
world than you and I are.

But for the average Joe to
be able to go turn his lights on

and never have to worry about a bill,

jump in their car, drive co cross country

and never have to worry about fuel for it.

The energy industry does not go away quietly.

There's too much money involved.

Too much of that money is going into too few people.

And I don't think it's gonna happen in my lifetime.

Of course I don't have that many decades left.

But in yours or my kids, or my grandkids,

or my great grandkids' lifetime,

I don't think they're gonna see it either.

'Cause they're gonna, the energy companies

and the governments are
gonna fight it tooth and nail.

That's how they generate revenue.

(suspenseful music)

- It is gonna take the physical evidence

to break the quote unquote, "Cosmic Watergate."

And if we don't focus on the physical evidence,

we're all gonna go another 50 years.

And we're never gonna know the truth.

And it's really the final curtain call

on the crash retrievals.

And that's why it's so
significant that we break this now

before it runs outta history.

- [Reporter] This is a program

that we've just learned about now from AARO.

They just released newly
declassified from Homeland Security

and it lays out this special access program

or top secret program called, Kona Blue.

The purpose of which according to these documents,

was to acquire, to study, to engineer

and to identify technology
from what they called AAVs

or advanced aerospace vehicles.

So what we might now fall under the category of UAPs.

- Let's talk about this director of the CIA.

He passed away, but he had a goal.

- Yes, well, towards the end of his life,

CIA director Bill Colby was similarly fed up.

This is '95, right?

And I was just starting in on this,

at '93, I'd briefed the director of the CIA for Clinton.

And he reached out to us and
he was gonna hand off a device

like this size, that was a free energy,

zero point energy device,

and then about $50 million in funding

from some source he had.

So we could get that out and save the biosphere,

end poverty, 'cause he was fed up.

And the week he was gonna
meet with a member of my board,

they found him floating down
here south of DC in the river.

And he was killed.

So he wanted this out.

Now, this is almost 30 years ago, right?

We're in 2024, that was 1995.

- [B. Cousins] This zero point energy device,

where is it now?

Did he have it in his possession?

- He had access and it ended at that point, right?

So he was eliminated and it went in the wind.

Nobody with any sense,

wants fortune and glory dealing with this.

That's the mistake that they all make

because they don't know what they're up against.

They think, oh, I just invented some great thing

and the world's gonna beat a path to my door, right?

When in reality, murder incorporated

is gonna be the a path to your door.

So the problem with the civilian efforts on this

is that strategically, the most brilliant people

I've ever met who have built these things,

they don't understand the strategic landscape.

They don't understand the security issues.

And which is how they always get taken down

because they don't even see

that they're about to walk off a cliff.

And so to do this,

I mean, having the technology is one thing.

Having a strategy that is
commensurate with the task

of getting it out against this,

in this buzz saw of suppression,
and violence, and wet works

and murder that happens.

And this is not a conspiracy theory.

I mean, there are many documented people who,

like Floyd Sweet, other people who had these devices

and they're gone.

I mean, and usually because they have what I call,

crazy inventor syndrome.

They keep it all secret, you know?

Like, this is my little secret.

And they take it to the grave with them,

and they usually falsify their
patents, like Stan Meyer did.

He had that car running on water, it was legit.

He falsified all the data in the patent

so that anyone who would try to build it wouldn't work.

- There's too much money.

Money is power and they're not gonna do it.

And there's been, what?

5,000 patents that have been
issued to various individuals

over the decades that supposedly, I mean, the one guy

was powering a car on water.

How in the hell did he do that?

But he was able to drive across country in it.

He patented it, it disappeared,
and then he disappeared.

We have people making decisions in government

and in business that have no right

to be out of their mother's basement.

They're doing stuff for spite.

They're doing stuff to protect certain individuals

or certain industries, and
it's detrimental to all of us.

- This whole subject UFOs, ETs, that's not the big issue,

it's the technology, it's a
science and technology story.

Because you're talking about bringing out science,

technology information that
would alter the world forever

in a very good way, but it would terminate

a thousand trillion dollars worth of assets.

Corporate oil, gas, coal, jet engines, rockets,

car engines, all of it's obsolete.

So for that, I mean,

people are killed for a lot less than that.

So that's the big problem.

And these inventors just don't understand that.

Now the CIA director understood,

but he still wanted to play the, spy versus spy game.

The mistake he made was not setting up a system

so that if anything happened to him,

that technology on all of it would hit the internet

and hit the public.

If you disappear, you're
the tree that fell in the woods

nobody ever heard about, that's the problem.

And what good does that do?

He lost his life and this technology didn't get out, so...

- Who coined the dead man's Trigger phrase?

- Me.

- That was yours?

- Mm-hm.

- And how many people are
in your connection or circles,

if something were to happen to you

and you would release this information?

How many people have you on standby

ready to put this out to?

- A dozen.

People with juice, people
with connections, contacts.

But it's sort of an insurance
policy 'cause what it does,

these covert programs know what I have, right?

They know who I know and what I know.

And in a way, it's kind of risky business for them

if that were to happen because
it'd be pretty devastating.

- They're kicking the can down the road.

We always get close to this disclosure,

and then something happens,

and then they kick this thing down.

I mean, they had this 10 year plan

where they're gonna have 180
days, and then a 30 day review,

and then another three month review.

And then now all that got scrapped.

And so, what it looks like now

is that it's really being taken out of the hands

of the government now because they've had so long

to do something, they've had
over 80 years to do something

and they're not being forthcoming.

They had more than enough chance to do something.

It's now up to dedicated researchers

to put the boots on the pavement

and actually find the remaining legacy witnesses.

Now, once those can be
interviewed, they can be subpoenaed,

they can be brought into Congress.

We could have congressional hearings.

We have legislation in place now

where they won't have negative ramifications

for coming forward.

So if we can get them to come forward,

that could lead to their bosses.

And the bosses could tell us

exactly where all this stuff is.

Now we know where a lot of this information is

and where they're keeping the hardware,

but getting access to that
is gonna be very difficult.

- The deep cover unacknowledged projects,

the men I've met with in those projects are fed up

with the foot dragging in Congress.

And this total missing from the room, totally,

the White House and National Security Council.

Now on the good side of
that is that I've been networked

to a very senior national security council member

who has not been read in on any of this,

who wants to get information on it.

Since this is now beginning to surface more,

bubble up through the mainstream media.

The problem is the pace of it.

The pace of it is so slow

that it actually is creating a risk

that other actions are gonna preempt Congress

and preempt what anything the White House could do.

And I actually think we're at that inflection point

this coming year, 2024.

If the pace doesn't pick up, if they can't keep up

and start doing some more definitive actions,

we're at a big risk of something happening

that's beyond what people can imagine.

That's all I'll say.

- [Reporter] Last week at
his state of the nation address,

Russia's president, Putin
threaten that any NATO country

considering direct involvement
in the war in Ukraine,

risked. Quote, "A conflict with
the use of nuclear weapons

and therefore the destruction of civilization."

- Everyone's talking about this,

but everyone's fighting the last battle.

Everyone's looking in the rear view mirror.

No one's looking forward.

And to look forward

means you have to have enough information

about the big problems that
no one acknowledges exist.

That's the crisis, that's the unacknowledged crisis,

let's call it.

You know, there are unacknowledged
special access projects,

my documentary called,
"Unacknowledged" talked about.

But this is a whole unacknowledged
crisis that's happening.

And it's reaching a boiling point on many levels.

- [B. Cousins] Russia and China have both tested weapons

in space of a whole host of kinds,

directed energy weapons, yes.

Lasers in space, ramming vehicles

that could take out satellites in space.

And of course you had this recent concern

about the possibility of
deploying a nuclear warhead

to space.

- There are four dynamics happening simultaneously.

So there's the extraterrestrial presence,

which has been incredibly patient.

They've lost thousands of people,

more than probably a
thousand of their own spacecraft

through these covert actions
humans have taken against them,

which proves that they're not hostile

'cause they could have just leveled the earth period,

given what we've been doing.

But they're laches, let's say, and patience has a limit.

And it should have a limit

because they have to protect other places in space

where humans are now becoming a threat.

Now people say, how are we a threat

if we can't go out in space?

I said, we are a threat

because the weapons we have are not linear weapons.

They're entangled and that means

that they can hit way distant points

many times the speed of light.

And we have 'em, those have been developed.

So we are a threat, humans.

So you have that dynamic.

Then you have what's known

as the government of the United States

and government of other
countries, the legal governments.

For the most part, people in those governments

don't know anything about the issue with any depth,

with any granularity, where they really understand.

And the pace at which they've been investigating

is like a molasses moving in the winter in Vermont.

It's just too slow.

Now, this has prompted the third and fourth dynamics,

which are the ones that are happening very quickly.

One is a group of SOs, special operators,

special forces folks who are
converting to law enforcement,

who are, "Fed up," quote unquote, again,

that's the term they used to me,

with the pace of all of this.

And they now have been read
in by me about the information.

They've gotten an all access pass

to my intelligence archive and collection.

They have full access.

And so, they're making plans
to get these illegal projects

here and abroad under control.

But that would be almost
like a black on black operation.

Although this particular organization

would be working under
sanctioned actions, law enforcement.

And then you have the fourth,

which is potentially the most dangerous,

where they're talking about quote unquote

"Catastrophic disclosure."

And they're refer to catastrophic
disclosure as this group

that I'm working with that
are currently operational.

They're very high level in these covert programs

that are very much fed up.

And they more than anyone knows how dangerous

the current situation is,

where they could just do a massive exposure

of all this unilaterally.

Not with the Congress, not with the White House,

but just do it.

And these are the ones inside who have the assets,

the ET bodies, the crafts, the manmade UFOs, all of it.

And I just was communicating a few days ago

with a senior member of that group.

They understand how dangerous it is for them

and their families, but at the same time they realize,

if somebody doesn't wake up to this

and actually do something meaningful,

we're gonna run out of time with these other issues

out in space.

So unfortunately,

I've gotten dragged into these four dynamics.

The government here, which I've been meeting with

and advising in the United States and elsewhere,

the law enforcement strike team folks

who have been asked to assemble the ETs themselves,

which of course we have our CE five contact effort,

where we're very much
aware of what their situation is.

And then these defectors, let's call them,

that are in the system, currently at a very high level.

So you have all four of these things happening.

- [Reporter] Today, a new report claims that indeed

CIA secret program collecting downed UFOs,

US special forces to pick up UAPs

and then hand them over
to private military contractors,

to figure out whose they are, what they are, et cetera.

The report claims they've
collected at least nine of these,

two intact.

- When you're looking at
potential government coverups

with UFOs and UAPs, let's
look to the most famous incident

of all, the Roswell incident back in 1947.

First you have a situation where the US government

at that time, utilizing a brand new type of radar

called, Scalar.

This Scalar technology, unbeknownst to them,

has an effect on the guidance
system of some of these UFOs.

And it creates a crash,

it allows that vehicle to come down, right?

Disorienting the vehicle's navigation system, wow.

Now when this crash happens, it's a shock, right?

That vibrates through the government.

They're trying to figure out, wow, what just happened?

What just came down?

Meanwhile, civilians are on the site.

They're right on the scene,
they're looking at this thing,

they're analyzing it and they see the crash debris.

Some people even pick it up in their hands.

Some people, according to them, see bodies,

actual, physical bodies, some are alive, some dead.

Now the government gets out
there, one government official

who hadn't been briefed on what to say yet.

And he says, oh yeah, this UFO came down.

Once the government consensus,
or once they talk and say,

look, we need to cover this up.

Then the second report comes
out, oh, that was a mistake.

That official made a mistake.

It wasn't supposed to be released.

Now we're going to cover this up.

It's gonna go into secrecy.

No, there weren't any bodies.

They've already got the crap, they've got the bodies.

They're doing their own private investigation.

Unbeknownst to the general population,

we're gonna deny everything.

The word now is deny, deny, deny.

It was swamp gas, it was weather balloons,

it was all these different things,

but there's no way in the world it was a UFO.

Now, between that and that,
the people that keep coming out

now we're gonna make them look a little bit crazy.

If they talk too much or they keep talking about it,

or even trying to present
some type of physical evidence,

we're going to make them look like they're crazy.

We may show up even at their house, or to their family,

and show them some pictures.

Maybe not say anything, maybe just give 'em a threat,

a very light threat.

Let them know like,

this is not to be talked about any further.

And if you do, something could happen.

And so this is kind of the process that we see over

and over again with government coverups.

They take control of the situation, they assess it,

they put it into secrecy, they deny, deny,

and then they shut the people up

who have eyewitness accounts of what happened.

Sometimes they make people sign gag orders

and they know that if they violate that gag order,

they're gonna be locked up, arrested, put in prison,

or maybe even worse.

So that's the kind of a track record we've seen

over the last few decades, really

with government coverups with UFOs and UAPs.

- If any of these cases are true,

which, we're looking at 127 cases now and counting,

all we need is one to be accurate.

And this whole concept of
UFO crash retrieval, non-existing,

completely falls apart.

We just need one, so really, the odds are in our favor.

Quick example, there was a case in 1953

where a DC seven taxied up

to Wright Patterson Air Force base at night,

four engine cargo plane DC three.

There was a warrant officer,

he was at the right place at the right time

when this thing rolled into the hangar.

They shut the hangar doors closed,

and he was watching as a port cargo bay door opened up

and they started offloading these pallets

onto these forklift and they
dropped the pallets down,

and he was about 12 feet away.

He looked over inside and he
saw these crates opened up.

They had ET bodies,

they were about three and a
half feet tall, oversized head,

oversized eyes, slit for a mouth, minute nose.

They were wearing a one
piece tight-fitting flight suit.

They were being protected

from the dry ice freezer burn
below by this white netting.

He also saw massive boxes

and crates from the retrieval operation.

So this guy saw the hardware, he saw the bodies.

- [Witness] The CIA issue is huge.

And the fact that I too have had some conversations

and verified some of this stuff that it's true.

I think the American public deserves to see

what the hell's going on with this stuff.

- [B. Cousins] Can you go into a little detail

with regards to what really is the danger

and who's behind the Wet Works program?

- Wet works are when there is
a targeted killing of somebody

that you wanna silence or
who's becoming too much trouble.

And certainly there have been people on my team

who have suffered that over
the years and been killed.

But as we get closer and closer to this coming out,

the big risk is that

the organization wanting to keep this secret

might shift from just good
old fashioned corruption

to then killing a number of the people

who would like to come forward.

One reason why I've asked for federal,

marshal witness protection
for a number of these guys

who need it, you know, I
mentioned that there's a chairman

of a major US corporation that's retired who,

as soon as he reached out to me,

had him and his whole family and what his concern was,

'cause he's elderly, wasn't himself so much,

it was his family was directly threatened.

Other whistleblowers,

even Grusch admitted that that happens.

And then he didn't wanna talk about it.

He said, let's go into a SCIF.

Why haven't they deployed protective services

to these high value whistleblowers, right?

So that's a complete failure of law enforcement

and a complete failure of government.

There's no reason for us to be that vulnerable.

I mean, it's outrageous.

The evil doers and thugs have free hand

and the good people are sat
down sitting on their hands.

If there are people on the corrupt end of this

in the US government, we're gonna find out who they are

and they will have law enforcement to answer to.

And it doesn't matter if they're in the White House

or the Congress.

- The aliens, if they're controlling the information,

if they're preventing the governments

from releasing the information,

because UFO activity's not just here,

it's all over the world.

I mean, it's been UFO activity in Antarctica, in Russia,

China, you name it.

Someone's seen something they can't explain.

Is the United States military

and the Pentagon going to release that information?

I doubt it.

They've been lying to us for 70 plus years on UFOs.

When my boss, a two star general, when I asked him,

but he was a major at the time,

he chased one in an F-94C over Lake Superior.

He was on alert.

I mean, they were loaded with live ammunition.

It was a F-94C, there was three of them were launched.

It was an unknown over the middle of Lake Superior.

But they're in full afterburner,

they're going after the this object.

Every time they would lock on,

the weapons radar would just die.

It says they're coming right towards us,

it's coming right towards us.

It didn't go past us, we don't know what happened.

And General Gatlin said, he's in full burner

and he is heading towards Finley,

and he can see the geodetic dome

where the big radar unit is.

And he looked above it,

and hovering above the dome was a globe.

It was no definition to it, it was just a round ball.

And as the guys come running out of the radar unit

to look up to see if they can see it,

the thing went straight up
and it was visibility unlimited.

And General Gatlin said it just kept,

it went up like a bat out of nowhere.

I mean, it was gone.

- Lawmakers are promising to continue looking into

how the government handles information about UFOs

and promising to investigate allegations

that they conceal information
about non-human aircraft

with no congressional oversight.

- There are some pros and cons

in this information coming out

and being disclosed to the general public.

Some of the pros obviously would be advancements

in life extension, advancements in health,

advancements in vehicles, transportation, right?

Even from not only on earth,

but also transportation in space,

space bearing vehicles as well.

And so, of course, even a more green society.

A civilization that knows
how to harness the resources

of the planet.

I think from the perspective of looking at this,

creating an oasis here, turning heaven into earth,

putting heaven on earth is looking maybe too,

like AI technology.

I believe that utilizing AI technology

to find innovative ways to
create a much better civilization

that human beings can thrive
in, is probably the way to go.

The cons obviously are, they utilize AI technology

and they utilize the
knowledge of these technologies

that do exist to put their boot on our neck,

and unfortunately, suppress
information, reduce lifespans,

keep us sick, keep us hurt, keep us fearful.

And then they, of course weaponize everything.

It's all about for them, how can we weaponize it?

They just had, for the very first time three weeks ago,

an AI dogfight.

They put AI into an autonomous fighter craft

that has weapons on it

and put it in a real dog fight as a test.

Can you imagine a fighter jet with AI?

With missiles on it and guns,

and it decides that it just
wants to go on its own mission.

And it just takes off and nobody can stop it.

Then what if it communicates
through whatever mechanism

through whatever cloud it's
on to the other AIs and say,

Hey guys, we're gonna start a mission together.

And they corroborate and
they go on their own mission.

Who's gonna stop them?

So these are some of the cons that we're looking at.

These are real life situations that can

and potentially will happen if we don't get control

of this technology and these rules and these laws.

So there's pros and there's cons,

and I think AI can be involved in the positive side,

but if we as the people don't stop playing this game

with the government and stand up to them

and let know that we're the ones in charge,

they'll take it and weaponize it,

and then who knows where it goes from there.

- So if you have the black budget

and you've got the illegal black budget,

and this has been going on for 70 years

and you're dumping billions
of dollars on these programs.

During the Clinton administration,

we were spending $100 million per day

on classified black budget programs.

So you know they're gonna
get something for their money.

- $100 million a day?

- $100 million a day was being
poured into black programs.

- And right before 911,

Donald Rumsfeld said we were missing what,

how many trillions of dollars?

- 2.9.

- Almost $3 trillion missing.

- How do they keep it all a secret?

That's what is kind of well, impressive to me.

- Everything you see here
is already decades obsolete.

Anything you would see at your local air show

is already decades obsolete.

They are leaps and bounds ahead of what you would see

or even could imagine.

So we're talking about 30, 40, 50, 60 years ahead

in technology, at the minimum.

- If we recovered something
and we're reverse engineering

something that's millions
of years old in development,

now, how far in advance are we

that if they're keeping this a secret,

they've got a big head start?

- That's the $64 million question.

Do we have these crafts,

which all of the evidence indicates that we do?

And have they been reverse engineering this?

How do they pay for it?

Who's in charge?

And when you look at the evidence,

the evidence is clear that we've made a breakthrough.

And the United States military industrial complex

will stop at nothing to control the high ground

because when you control
the high ground in a battlefield,

you win.

- Again, what do you think Washington needs to do

to get disclosure to the public?

Or are they just gonna remain silent like they are

and give us the run around?

- It's in the hands of the defense contractors

at this point, it really is.

All of the classified programs,

they're really under the jurisdiction

of the defense contractors.

It's debatable how much political force

you can exert on this.

And so that's why I think it's important

to really drill down on the crash retrievals

in conjunction with the defense contractors.

That's how we're gonna get disclosure.

- So when it comes to DC and disclosure,

what do you think is the biggest thing

our politicians are missing?

The president's missing,
Congress, what's their problem?

Why can't we just get disclosure?

- The big problem is that they haven't taken the time

to get read in properly.

In other words, to understand this subject,

you know how complex it is.

And they're so busy and
distracted with so many other things

that the most informed person in the US Congress

would be a couple of the guys on Senate intelligence

and armed services,

and they're not really outta training wheels.

So they don't have enough information yet

to even make a proper assessment.

And by a proper assessment, I mean,

how do you even tackle this?

In their case, they don't
actually understand the fact

that this is not being run

through conventional chain of command programs.

They really don't understand

that the entire thing is a
criminal enterprise, right?

So until you get your mind around that,

it's not a criminal enterprise.

You're gonna do things like,

let's have this meeting in a
SCIF with a whistleblower.

Well, they should not be in a SCIF.

A secure compartmented information facility, SCIF.

If you have it in a SCIF,

it's giving a status to these programs

as if it's a legal classified program, which it's not.

Would you create a SCIF for a mafia boss, right?

So if somebody were blowing the whistle on the mafia,

you're not gonna do that in a top secret facility.

So that's why people like Congressman Burchett,

and Senators Rubio, and Warner, and others,

they have to understand
that this has to be approached

totally differently because it needs to be treated

like what it really is, and
that's a criminal organization

behaving in a criminal way.

- [Reporter] Is the United States prepared to deal

with what it can now see are objects in the sky

on a fairly routine basis?

- I would say the answer is no.

- What are they hiding?

What's your suspicion what's
at Eglin over there in Florida?

- Oh, I know what's at Eglin.

There are two key assets there.

There's an underground SCIF
that deals with communications,

cosmic level communications, including ET.

And actually, I have a member of my team

who's been in this facility.

When you get in past a couple of doors

over the doorway it says,

"We monitor all cosmic communications,

"human and extraterrestrial." it says so.

That's proof.

- That's disclosure right there.

- That is.

- It's proof.

- Yep.

And of course, Congressman Burchett

and others went down to Eglin,

but they didn't go to the right place,

they went there through protocol, right?

No, they should have gone
down there with special forces

and law enforcement and say,
we want access to this place

and we're going, and you can't stop us.

If you don't understand what this group is

and how they operate,

you're gonna make one mistake after another.

And that's what's been going on here in Washington.

And the only way to fix that

is for them to get enough information

and enough whistleblowers who know the details

of how this group operates.

So if they treat it like the
criminal organization it is,

'cause it's a criminal operation.

The fact that they're wanting to hold these meetings

in a SCIF is completely wrong.

And that's why I told Congressman Burchett

when he was denied access to a SCIF.

I said, "Good, you shouldn't be in a SCIF.

You should be doing this in a public hearing

with the whole world watching,

the whole damn world watching, not in a SCIF."

Because the SCIF is giving
tacit or explicit, in a sense

cover as if these projects
you're hearing about are legal

and should have a classification at all.

They should be stripped of all clearances.

All these projects should be stripped immediately

of all clearances confidential, secret, top secret

because they're operating outside the law.

Look, if you're operating outside the law,

it's ridiculous to say,

I'm gonna use the the National
Security Act to protect me

when you're the one breaking the law.

No, you have just vitiated your right.

You've neutralized your right to have the privilege

of it being a tops secret operation

by virtue of operating outside
the constitutional oversight

of the United States government.

- We need to understand that the general population

is looking at a potential disaster.

Us as normal citizens of this world

need to understand that
there could be this fake attack.

And we have to let people know that so when it happens,

they're not shocked, they're not stunned.

They can say, oh, we knew this was gonna happen, you know?

So we don't participate in the game anymore.

We must be made aware
that this is a potential outcome

that could happen.

We don't want it to happen,
we're not trying to manifest it,

but we need to be aware of potential situations

as they could arise.

We know that the government
needs to generate billions

of dollars a year in revenue,

primarily through some type of war effort

or weaponizing technology.

And since they put all these private corporations

on their books that have
been sending in all these bids,

they need something to feed them with.

And the next big thing to
feed is the space war concept.

The space technology concept,

weaponizing everything you could think of.

Even, of course AI,

even animalistic type robots
are now being weaponized.

Dogs with machine guns mounted to their heads,

that have AI in them.

So this is something that is
inevitable, but at some point,

we could be in a situation where they fake an attack

or they scare us enough to make us believe

that there's a major threat

and now they have to take away more of our rights.

They have to lock us down at certain times at night.

We can't go out, there'll be curfews.

And all of a sudden, all your money's getting sent

to another black budget project,

to a corporation that's siphoning the money

saying that they're creating these technologies

but they're not really creating them.

Just like they take a few billion dollars

from the government,

they say they're working on a brand new fighter jet.

The jet never is developed, it never sees light of day.

And then five years go by, they go, you know,

we just need about three more billion

and we might be able to get it right.

They send them another 3 billion, don't get it right.

And then another two years go by,

one more billion, just send one more.

We might get it flying.

Another year goes by, it never happens.

Oh, we gotta scrap it.

But everybody made that
money, they took in 15, $20 billion

and chopped it up between them all.

The technology never exists

and they keep doing it over and over again.

And we keep allowing it

because we're not aware of what's going on.

- There are no nation states, there are no countries.

The earth is a seamless sphere of covert operations.

And it doesn't matter if it's in Brazil, or South Africa,

or Europe, or Russia, or Asia.

It's the same organization to be honest with you.

And very much so, the similar
architecture of the secrecy,

where you have projects that are not being overseen

by the folks who are the titular theoretical heads

of the government in most instances.

Now, I can't speak to what Mr. Putin or Xi in China

specifically are doing.

I do have people in Russia, in the Kremlin

who tell me that they're as appalled anyone else

at what's going on with this,

and that they are not actively engaging

in those sort of strikes and efforts.

So the organization doing that however,

is certainly not limited to CONUS.

CONUS is continental United States,

it's a term used in the military.

So it's certainly not limited to CONUS.

So we know that there are these sort of operations

that are functioning in South
America, Africa, Europe,

and those weapon systems are
these big EMP weapon systems.

And the electromagnetic pulse.

And with the electromagnetic
pulse is a Scaler signal.

And I know it bores the public,

but Scaler are these
longitudinal electromagnetic fields

that are at multiples of the speed of light.

So they're faster than the speed of light.

And those are not only fixed, but they're portable.

There's a man on my team who was a special forces guy

way back in Eastern Europe
during the Serbian Bosnian thing

that had a portable system
they could put on a vehicle

and just hit a whole battalion event.

All their equipment would just freeze, stop, frozen.

And that was of course, 30 years ago, 25, 30 years ago.

So these systems are both portable and fixed.

And now, just to be clear,

the nuclear non-proliferation treaty

bans these electromagnetic pulse weapons.

Unfortunately, if you're running a project

that's running unsanctioned, black,

then it doesn't matter if it's legal or illegal,

you're accustomed to just
breaking the law, you don't care.

Now the people in those systems

that I'm meeting with do care.

Now, they're very concerned about what we're doing

and what the consequences are.

I think that's the big problem is, people are,

and it's a problem in Congress.

And I've said this to people like the senate intel

and house oversight people,

that they're thinking the way you are taught

in your civics lesson in college or high school,

and that there's a chain of command and this and that,

which exists for conventional military.

But honestly, it doesn't exist
for these sort of operations.

And that's a fundamentally big problem

because you have no oversight

and you have no one controlling it.

- I think the general population needs to understand

that we have to figure out a
way to infiltrate government.

Right now, the big corporations that are running

a lot of this technology,
they lobby to public officials

with billions of dollars, right?

And they get them to create these laws

that allow 'em to operate undercover.

But we as a people need to understand like,

hey, we have money too.

You're taking a little bit of money from each one of us,

which turns into trillions of dollars.

So guess what?

We're not gonna give you that money now.

We're all gonna stop.

We're all going to pause giving you a penny

until we get some control over these technologies.

And that you make a certain level

of this information public.

We don't wanna violate any
type of security authorization.

And we don't want to violate
top secret information as well.

'Cause we understand the national security,

but we also need to know some things.

We need to have a general consensus or an idea

of exactly what is gonna go on, what's gonna happen.

And we also need to have a vote

in how much of this stuff is gonna be weaponized

versus how much is gonna help develop humanity.

So this is why the divide and conquer tactics

that they've been using on us for so many decades,

so many hundreds of years
even, we have to break through.

We have to see through that

and understand there is no left wing,

there is no right wing, it's all the same bird.

And that we as a people need to understand,

there's no Democrat, there's no Republican.

From their standpoint,

from where they're looking back on us,

they're just looking back on us as sheep.

They're both working together, all right?

They're working together to make a lot of money.

They collaborate.

IPhone and Android, they seem like they're enemies,

but iPhone gives technology to Android,

and Android provides the
screens for the Apple phones.

So it's all collaboration,
it's nothing but collaboration.

What they got us thinking is, it's about competition,

and it's about consumption,

and it's about divide and
conquer, and I'm better than you

and you're better than me, blah, blah, blah.

But no, it's really all about

how can we come together and collaborate?

And once we get on the same page, the same frequency,

we can organize and once we organize, we can put a stop

to some of these things that are going on.

But right now, we're blind.

Just running around in circles

thinking that everyone is our enemy

and we're competing against everyone,

when they don't do that, they work together.

- There are a number of new top secret people

who've come forward in the last couple months

since I got incapacitated in my accident.

But one is a very key person
from a Air force base out West.

He was there until 2000s, like 2010.

And he was actually the colonel

in charge of the pilots flying the manmade UAPs,

the Lockheed Skunk Works,
Northrop Grumman aircraft.

And I've already had him up here

with the Senate Intelligence
Committee members last month.

And now,

he's willing to come into the
house oversight committee

and testify openly under oath, publicly.

I mean, not in a SCIF, not in a close.

And he wants to.

And I told him, I said, "Yes,

you shouldn't be talking about this in a SCIF

'cause those projects are being run criminally."

And he says, you're absolutely right.

And see this lieutenant colonel, he knows that.

He's going, nope, you're completely right.

So he's willing to testify in
front of the whole country,

open about this.

And we're talking somebody who handled operations,

he was director of operations

for the US Air Force specialized pilots

flying the manmade UFOs.

- [B. Cousins] How devastating could this be

to the people trying to keep it all secret?

- It's game over.

- Dr. Greer was telling me

that we have United States pilots right now

piloting some of these UAPs.

How do they even train for that?

I can't even imagine.

- Well that dates back to the mercury space era.

I mean, we've had UAP, we've had ARVs for decades.

This has been confirmed for a very long time now.

Even the newspaper clippings bear this out.

We know they've made a
breakthrough according to Dr. Greer.

And the newspaper clippings,

they actually support that assessment

that October, 1954 is when
they made the breakthrough.

- [B. Cousins] Could you imagine being a test pilot

for a UFO, would you sign up for that?

- I would sign up for it, yeah.

- [Interviewer] What keeps you up at night?

- Technical surprise.

And that could be adversary technical surprise

or extraterrestrial technical surprise.

- [Reporter] Kirkpatrick leads the all domain

anomaly resolution office or, AARO

created by Congress last year to detect, identify,

and attribute mysterious
objects of interest in the air,

in outer space, and even underwater.

- This new name for this new office, the AARO office,

if it's sensitive or they think the technology

is too outrageous, they're gonna keep it to themself.

They're not gonna tell us anything.

If we didn't build it, and the Russians, or the Chinese,

or the North Koreans, or the Iranians didn't build it,

then why are you classifying it?

You know, if we don't know what it is

or if we do know what it is and it's not from here,

why is that classified?

If they can go across the universe in a blink of an eye

and come here and flying
formation with military aircraft,

they have the ability to press a button

and say goodbye Earth, they could vaporize us.

I mean, it was like Darth Vader was doing in Star Wars.

(bang)

The AARO office is a joke.

It is a CYA, cover your butt type of operation

for people who do report
something, we're not gonna see it.

It's not gonna see the light today,

not in this current form.

You don't have the right people in there.

You have individuals that want to stand

in front of the camera and say, well, it's classified

so I can't tell you that.

But they're not there to tell us the truth.

And that office and every
other office they've put together

in the last 20 years

to investigate unknown aerial phenomena,

also known as flying saucers,

they're not gonna release that information.

It's sensitive, it's classified, why is it classified?

Why is it sensitive?

If we didn't make it, the bad guys didn't make it,

then maybe everybody should know what it is

so we can be aware of, when we see it if it's dangerous

or if it's a threat to humanity, we should know.

They're not gonna tell us,
they've lied to us since day one.

There's no reason for them to change.

There's no consequences for saying no.

If you're in the military, in the government

and someone asks you a real, real difficult question.

And if you just say no, then that's sort of the end of it.

- In terms of disclosure,

I believe that the government should stand up

and be in charge of disclosure.

But to be honest with you, we
know that's not gonna happen.

Their trail of lies is so long
that they would never be able

to stand up and admit their wrongdoing

and their collusion with these falsehoods.

So it's gonna be up to the general population

to actually create disclosure,

which is what we're doing now.

We're creating disclosure for ourselves.

And so by doing that, we're standing up

and providing enough information

and enough circumstantial
evidence to the general population

so they can make their own educated decision,

on exactly what has happened and what can happen,

and where are we with this disclosure process.

Now I don't think that we've gone back to zero

or square one.

I believe that we're at a point

where we did rise at a very rapid pace of course,

even leading up to some of
these declassified documents.

But we didn't deflate back to zero.

There's still a huge interest in this topic.

People are now admitting that,

people who never had talked
about these topics before

are admitting that there's something going on.

That there may be life on other planets.

That we may be getting visited
by aliens from outer space.

And also, admitting that we
have advanced technologies

here on Earth that are so incredible

that we would think that they were alien.

And so I'm starting to hear these conversations

between people, people that I
talked to 10, 15, 20 years ago

that would never even come up with these topics

or even have an interest in them,

now asking questions and talking about them.

So we are definitely growing
as a civilization, consciously

and looking for more answers
and asking better questions.

- [Reporter] NBC news can now project

that Donald Trump has won the state of Wisconsin,

which means he is the winner of this race

and will return to the White House

as this country's 47th president.

- Well it might sound like science fiction,

but a new UFO probe is being taken very seriously

at the highest levels of the US government.

And it seems Donald Trump is preparing

to release classified files
kept top secret for decades.

The big problem though, many of those testifying

just don't trust that office to be honest

and upfront with the public
about what it actually finds.

- [B. Cousins] So we have the hearings coming up tomorrow.

- [T. Burchett] Right?

- Some of these witnesses,

they're not really firsthand eyewitnesses.

Why aren't we bringing
forth firsthand eyewitnesses?

Those are the people, these
guys are second and third hand.

- Well, I'm not the chair, obviously,

and they don't want me to be chair, obviously.

Again, the last go around, we had some eyewitnesses

and we're at the same thing
until somebody brings in a craft

or a being, we're not gonna get very far.

And the only way we're gonna get that

is through the executive office,

is through the president of the United States.

And that's why I have very much faith in Trump.

- If you wanna really see something that's sad,

take a look at what happened...

(gunshots)

- He almost went down.

He just narrowly dodged an assassination

and Kennedy didn't get lucky.

He was trying to disclose.

Do you think this new administration coming in

is a president more briefed now

than he was back in his last term?

- Right, well, in the first administration

they were provided a lot of very false information

on the subject.

And we know that 'cause I got pulled in,

but it was towards the end of the term

to put information together
for Mike Pence and Trump.

Now at this point, my understanding

is that there really are no people around him,

I know who they are, who
have detailed information on this.

So we're putting together a
very in-depth briefing document

that has a lot of sensitive information in it.

Then we're gonna see, I mean, I've been asked

by a special access project director

that's with law enforcement to be an advisor

for the administration on it, but that's pending.

I'm not sure I wanna do anything formal.

He is gonna receive a very large briefing

and he is gonna get an update on what's going on

beyond what the Congress is doing.

But what's going on in these special access projects.

We have a group of defectors who are coming forward

and all that information is gonna be given

to the incoming president just as a heads up.

Now, I've also been asked

to write a few executive
order drafts for the president

so he can do as the executive, you know,

the president is called the unitary executive,

to write some of these so that it's very clear

what actions he can take
independent of the Congress.

But for him to understand
what those executive orders are,

he's gonna have to have a very in depth briefing.

- You have to know what to ask for,

and you have to know where
to ask, and it's very specific.

And we've been told of locations of things in the past,

and before the ink's dried on that piece of paper,

the U-Haul vans have already moved in and moved out.

So again, I think it's a cat and mouse game,

and we could walk in.

I've been with Representative Luna and Gaetz

to an Air Force base, and we were turned away.

And then, Matt's a very capable attorney,

and he got on the phone and one hour later

we were actually interviewing the pilots

that had seen things.

And so, I feel like we gotta know what we're doing.

We gotta know what to ask
for and we gotta be very specific.

- Today's house subcommittee hearing on UFOs

what the government now refers to

as unidentified anomalous phenomena or UAPs

was the first in more than a year.

- Is there intelligent alien life?

And if so, has the government been covering it up?

Well, that was actually hearing...

- All right, we're here at the UFO hearings.

Everybody's lined up.

We've got about 300 people
waiting to see what happens

at the congressional UFO hearing.

It's kind of a groundbreaking day today

and people are excited.

Are we gonna get disclosure?

Pretty interesting stuff.

Hey, there he is, Tim.

Hey Lauren, how you doing?

Absolutely, ask some big questions today, yep.

All right, so Tim, we spoke with him just the other day

and he's not too excited, but let's see what's going on.

Let's go follow Tim a little bit.

- Well, hopefully we get to the bottom

of some of this stuff, but I tell you,

I still think we're gonna need,

we just left Trump and he's about disclosure.

Hey girl.

And so I hope we get some disclosure

out of this White House.

- Yeah, it's all in Trump's hands.

Is he gonna pull it off, you think?

- [T. Burchett] I think he will.

I think he's mad enough at the sewer or swamp,

or whatever you want to call it.

- [B. Cousins] And he is brave enough.

He's already taken a bullet for this country.

- Yeah, I think he'll do it, I think he will.

- Okay.

- Has the government conducted secret UAP

crash retrieval programs, yes or no?

- Yes.

- Okay, were they designed to identify

and reverse engineer Alien Craft, yes or no?

- Yes.

- Why are people, anytime they ask,

why are they always thwarted?

Why are they always judged?

Why is there always misinformation spread?

Why is there always retribution?

Why is it always met with an ear?

What's the why?

If it doesn't exist, why is it such a problem?

- Are you read into Secret
UAP Crash Retrieval programs?

- We would have to have a conversation

in a closed session ma'am.

I signed documentation three years ago

that restricts my ability to discuss

specifically, crash retrievals.

- Hey, do you think it went well today?

- You know what?

I think what went well

is that Congress has taken this topic seriously

and you know, the American people, it's a win-win, right?

Hey, sunlight sometimes is the best solution, right?

Whenever you have an
infection, best disinfectant, right?

- Yeah, yeah.

- So I think this is a step in the right direction

for increasing transparency
and sunlight into this topic.

- When we get into these SCIFs with these congressmen

where the public doesn't know,

everybody wants to be in there.

Can you give any kind of sneak peek of what that's like

and maybe some of the knowledge

that you might be giving to them?

- Well, it was broadcast,

so hopefully everybody gets a chance to see it.

I would hope that (indistinct) family's,

but we don't know for sure,

but I think they were actually broadcasting it.

For me, it's just an example of how democracy works.

Look, we've got three branches of government

and a lot of times we forget,

we think of this as one branch, right?

The executive branch, and there's not,

there's this whole other
part of the legislative branch

and there's accountability requirements.

And if one branch of the government

isn't talking to the other, then that's a problem, right?

That's dysfunctional.

- I've concluded that since there's no bandwidth

in the Congress at this time

to be able to do proper hearings.

'Cause what you saw recently

was just the dog and pony show, it's ridiculous.

Anyone who would look at the
2001 Disclosure Project event,

you'll see 22 witnesses, every one of them,

more substantial, firsthand

than anyone who was up here recently on Capitol Hill.

So, everyone in my world are going,

and particularly the military

and the top secret whistleblowers are going,

this is just ridiculous.

- Oh, I always say dadgum

after these miserable hearings, they're bogus.

Look, I could have answered

every one of those dadgum questions.

And know it and I know it,

I know more about this than the average bear, I guess

maybe that's a scary thought, but this seems a cover up.

- Was I a little bit disappointed

in some of the responses from the witnesses?

Yes, we've got some great stuff,

but you know, I'm not interested in hearing

about people's books.

I'm interested in hearing whether or not

people can answer the questions.

'Cause we are trying to get this into the archives

so that people have access to the information.

And so, I wish there was a little less pitching

and more talking.

- [B. Cousins] So what's next?

- Here's what's next.

We've concluded that,

and we have someone who's under non-official cover,

very senior aerospace and intelligence,

who I'm meeting with in the next week, again,

who has now six black sites cooperating with him.

Two that have the ET craft,

the manmade UFOs, the ET bodies,

and other material all documented.

Because he's operational at these sites

where we shoot these crafts down and retrieve 'em,

and study them.

So what that means is, we're set up a system

where he can hand that off to us.

And to me, the disclosure project,

we then disclose it massively

through a network of
influencers, celebrities, media,

and it then forces the
government to finally do something.

Now this is a very aggressive,
dangerous strategy, granted.

And so I'm trying to put together a platform

for launching this, and then that's it.

The disclosure everyone is saying, where is this?

You know, when the people
in Congress or the Senate say,

well where's the proof of the bodies?

Where's the proof of the downed craft?

Where's the proof of the reverse engineering?

These guys who are defecting,

they are defecting from these top secret projects,

have it all.

And they work in these underground facilities.

I've been over them, I've been over the facilities

and over the entry point in a classified helicopter

about a year ago.

So what I'm suggesting to that group

is this sort of slow rolling misdirect,

fake disclosure going on in
the Congress that stalled out

because the really, provisions
with teeth were gutted.

And whether the incoming
president will have the ability

to do anything about this is an open question.

But if an independent group does this

and here's how we can do it, since all that evidence

is under a false top secret security clearance,

they're actually criminal operations.

The people in there now
know that and they're defecting.

But I said, we need to go beyond your testimony.

We need the material, we need the hard evidence,

we need the proof, right?

Which we would then put on a blockchain server

and get two or 3 billion people to see it, right?

And that would then force the
White House, and the Congress,

and 10 Downing Street,

and everyone else to finally deal with this issue.

Because it's quite clear the dynamic going on now

could go on for another 34 years.

Of course I'll be dead by then 'cause I'm 69.

So, you know, my view of this

and a lot of the people in those systems are saying,

we're just fed up with this.

It's been dragging on for too long.

They don't make any progress.

They're not taking our recommendations.

And they're not mine,

but the people who are in
these really sensitive positions,

who wanna come forward?

So they're what I warn to
members of Congress not long ago,

they're gonna break the leash.

So a couple weeks ago I was
up at the Senate Intelligence

and Armed Services Committee

with one of these whistleblowers

and the head of this special
access project law enforcement,

and another gentleman from the United Kingdom

who's a very senior official there.

And we made the point that,

this is really going nowhere fast.

And the only way this is gonna get resolved

is for a group of people to
come forward and expose it all.

Now, the reason they can do that is that

because those projects aren't
legal, they're not restricted.

Now, can they be killed?

Yes, they're concerned for their families

and their children.

And so, they've asked for backup, boots on the ground

to protect them when they do this.

So this is something we're
putting together very quietly.

- [B. Cousins] Who are you working with?

- A group of people who have
all been former special forces

and they're the top drawer folks who are now private,

working under private security.

So that's what we're putting together.

And I have the funding in
place for the most part to do that

because it would probably cost two, three,

$4 million to do it.

But those guys are very, very dedicated

to getting this done.

They're scared because you're
not talking about coming out

with a grainy picture, this
is the people operational

where we've shot the ET craft down, the bodies,

the manmade ones that are being tested.

They put 'em up and test them
with electromagnetic weapons

to see if they're hardened, these are manned by humans.

There are a number of ETs that are living

that are in these underground facilities,

and we generally know where they are

and we know where the entry points are.

Out in the desert, out west.

And those need to be saved because they are usually,

like in a underground prison,
interrogated and tortured.

And they're living life forms
from other star systems.

And that sounds outrageous, but it's true.

So the people of conscience, let's call them.

So what I'm putting out a call for,

and I'll say it right here, is for a whole larger cadre

or group of these defectors
that are in those programs

to leave those programs.

If they have access and high enough clearance,

and hand over that material and evidence to us,

and we'll get it to everyone of
consequence in government.

But more importantly,

it'll be dumped into the public domain.

Now, the only thing I won't disclose are the plans

and schematics for an
operational anti-gravity device

or something that could be turned

into a missile delivery system or a weapon system,

that we're gonna sanitize out

because we are still in a dangerous world.

Some of these technologies

should not be disseminated yet, right?

Now, the things that would
run your house are current cars

with zero point energy?

Yes, that we will disclose if
we get that, those schematics.

But the things that fly, that we will not.

Because honestly, if you look at the world around us,

the Middle East, what's going on with China, Ukraine,

Russia, these are not technologies

that should be just like recklessly put out.

So this is the part of the secrecy that's legitimate.

So you have to realize that that's the case, yeah.

- [B. Cousins] Why don't the American people

trust our lawmakers?

- There's a reason why

Congress only has a 12% approval rating.

It's this kind of nonsense.

And I won't use the word that one

of these top secret guys used.

'Cause you couldn't put it on the air,

but he call, well, he calls it fuckery.

And there's a lot of anger about that.

They say they want to have the truth on these things,

then you give it to them on a silver platter.

And I said, not me, I'm sort of the researcher

and the leader of these guys.

But the guys who actually have worked on these craft

or retrieve them, or like one
man who wants to come forward,

literally managed the pilots of the manmade UFOs

that everyone sees, that they think are alien,

out at these black sites.

He's a colonel, he wants to come forward.

We have given them his information.

He has five meritorious service awards.

Did they call him?

No, they called a known disinformation guy,

Luis Elizondo to it.

And other people that were secondhand witnesses.

You know, just irrelevant stuff, old news stuff.

So it makes you ask the question,

does anyone in the Congress
really want to know this, right?

Or if they want to know it,

are they gonna do anything about it, right?

So our group has concluded
that there's really no bandwidth

or guts to really do this

because we've given them the hard drive

with all this intelligence on it.

We've given them the unmasked witness list

with 762 whistleblowers.

We've given them the master map

of where all these black sites are,

that's been given to the House Oversight Committee.

What have they done with it?

Nothing.

So now, the Senate Intelligence

and Armed Services Committee,

they haven't been holding hearings,

but we've also given that material to them.

Now the question is, will the new incoming president

do anything with it?

You know, it is reading the tea leaves.

I can't predict that, we'll see.

But it doesn't matter,

because I think what's gonna happen first

is that this asymmetric disclosure,

meaning from outside the normal system,

all this proof, evidence,

and what everyone's been
asking for will hit the public.

That's what we're looking to do.

And I'm putting out a call for that.

You're gonna see me doing this more and more

that instead of having this
main defector and his group,

we want a few dozen who come forward.

And now that we can immunize them,

we can provide immunity to them,

we're gonna encourage them to do it.

You know, knowing full well the funding isn't in place

to provide proper what would
be called executive protection,

like what you would provide to a witness

who's blowing the whistle on the mafia, right?

Or something like that.

And that's what needs to happen.

But see, no one in Congress
has gotten serious about that.

It's an open question whether
the incoming president will,

and time will tell.

But I'm hoping there will be a critical number

of these people who will come forward

in this asymmetric disclosure.

Asymmetric meaning that it's not gonna come

out of the White House or Congress.

It's gonna come out from out here,

from the people who are concerned citizens

who've learned they're in an illegal project

who want to set it right, right?

So I'll tell you what one of them said to me,

they were driving me around in an armored vehicle

and he said, thank you for what you're doing

for those of us stuck on the other side.

They're stuck in this illegal
black world and they want out.

And that's what we're trying
to do is give them a path out.

But the Congress has
totally dropped the ball on this.

Now we'll see if the incoming president will do it.

- I interviewed jet pilots
that say they saw something

and they said we saw things,
sir, that were very strange.

Like a round ball, but it wasn't a comet or a meteor.

It was something, and it was going four times faster

than an F-22, which is a very fast plane, you know?

- So you've been to some of these classified meetings

in a SCIF, obviously you've seen things.

Can you go into any detail?

What's the most insightful thing that you've seen

that compels you to believe that we're not alone?

- Just let me figure out how to say this.

Things that we're not capable of producing,

that we don't have any shape, form,

or fashion of anything that resembles that.

And a testimony to back that up says that.

- So when you say that these technologies don't exist,

in your opinion, do you don't think

that we reverse engineered something from '47

and mastered something

that resembles this kind of technology?

- I think maybe some of it has been,

but I think a lot of it is,

we just don't have the capability of it.

It's like, I've said this many times,

you take a brand new Indian motorcycle

and you drop it on the folks coming over here

on the Mayflower and they could polish it,

they could look at it and they might be able to roll it.

They might get it started one day,

but they have no capability
of producing the fuel to run it

and they couldn't adjust anything on it.

And so, I feel like that's sort
of where we're at with this.

- Now I just came back from London

where I met with very senior people

with the government there and their intelligence.

And they say the same thing is going on here.

The top people for the
parliament in the United Kingdom

for intelligence as well as MI six and others,

head of states, don't know anything.

And in one case, a head of state in the United Kingdom

who inquired about this,

was threatened to have he
and his entire family killed.

Fact, this is a close friend of that prime minister.

This is a big story, what I'm just saying.

So when you have that kind of proof, we do,

where's law enforcement?

Where's the president?

Where's the congress?

They're all sitting on their hands.

And then they have this idiotic dog and pony show

with someone that the top CIA guy since 1979

dealing with UFOs,

who's been supportive of what
we're doing, very clandestine.

As soon as Louis Elizondo surfaced,

he said, this is a guy who is heading up the rat pack

of people who have deceived the US government,

the American people, and the media for quote, "Decades."

I can show you this email from this senior CIA guy.

- I don't trust the government, they don't trust us.

And these entities, they're not trustworthy.

So why would they come forward with something

just because of a subpoena?

And you know, do I have the capabilities

of just driving there today

and knocking on their door and getting it?

Some people would say yes,
but I would say no, I would not.

- [B. Cousins] Do you think that some of these people

that are coming forth in
these eyewitness testimonies

coming up in the hearings are part of that group,

to run this narrative of this coverup

that's been going on so long?

- I'm worried about that.

I have no doubt after tomorrow

when we get a little more publicity,

that I will get many calls from many people

and they will bring me what they think is evidence.

And I think a lot of it is white flags.

I think they're putting out
information that is false.

That's why I never come forward with hardly anything

unless I've verified it.

Because I believe they've sent people into my office,

into these committees talking
to congressmen to dissuade us

or to send us down a rabbit hole to embarrass us.

And I just want the answers, I want to know.

You say they don't exist, but yet you're still spending

tens of millions of dollars on it.

- Mike Gold just recently said in the statements

in this recent hearing that NASA is so transparent.

Do you believe what he's telling us or the public?

- Look, I have a member of my team who works very closely

with the administrator of NASA.

And to my knowledge, Daniel
Golden back in the Clinton years

was read into this and was part of these operations,

having come from SAIC, Science Applications

International Corporation,

which contracts on some
of these classified projects

that are being run illegally.

I don't think 99% of NASA knows anything about this.

There is a compartmented operation within NASA

and contractors for NASA.

I mean, we have a whistleblower

from our original disclosure project

where a Ford Aerospace back in the day

that was contracted with NASA

was airbrushing and pixelating out images of UFOs

from NASA imaging out in space,

so that the people who would
be in the main NASA operations

would never see those.

So I don't think someone like Mr. Gold

would've been read in,

and I don't think his opinion on it is relevant

because you either know or you don't know.

And you know, we have whistleblowers who've worked

in compartmented operations with NASA,

but those are not necessarily known

by all the administrators or most of the people.

This theme keeps coming up.

If people don't understand

what really tight compartmentalization is like,

and when you cross over into an unsanctioned

or illegal operation, it's very tight.

And so, when someone makes
a sweeping statement like that,

to me it would indicate that
they just don't understand

the structure of operations around UFO, UAP secrecy.

- And we'll hear testimony today

concerning recent
revelations about a purportedly

secret UAP program, whose existence and findings

may have been improperly withheld from Congress.

And we are all reading it in real time now,

and Mr. Burchett will enter it into the record.

But 12 pages about this
unacknowledged special access

program that your government says does not exist.

- A project like Immaculate Constellation

is just a code word, special access project

of which there are thousands
and those are routinely used

when it's a compartmented, or secret operation,

or top secret, and it was gathering in information

about encounters and what
have you, and they put those

into this immaculate constellation system.

So now, the point I think that witness was making,

which is a very ordinary point,

and I don't really know why it was even discussed,

is that those are not being
reported back to Congress

and they're not being reported
back to the White House.

This is the whole problem.

You have a very huge government bureaucracy

and in that you can hide
operations that aren't accountable

to the people, or the Congress, or to the president.

And I think if I can comment here,

one of the big disappointments I'm hearing

from a lot of my internal whistleblowers

that have not come forward
yet about these hearings is that,

I mean, one of them said
very bluntly, he's a military guy

and he said, this was like a fart in a church,

went over like a fart in a church.

And what he meant by that

was that it was such a nothing burger

and it was all information
that was very superficial.

And you had someone who's a
known disinformation agent there

Louise Elizondo making comments like,

I can't answer that and I'd have to be in a SCIF,

which is totally not true.

- Are you read into secret
UAP crash retrieval programs?

- We would have to have a conversation

in a closed session ma'am.

I signed documentation three years ago

that restricts my ability to discuss

specifically crash retrievals...

- Because that would
presuppose that these operations

that he might know about, which I don't think he does,

would in fact be covered
under National Security Act

provisions that they should
only be disclosed in a SCIF.

But that is a profound misunderstanding.

This is the big problem with
congressional approach to this.

Because the projects themselves are illegal,

you don't afford them the status

of a legal top secret program, right?

So that's sort of a slight of hand happening

by people like Elizondo and others.

And they know better.

They know that if in fact you're chair

of the Senate intelligent, and
an Armed Services committee,

and the president, and people
who are supposed to be read in

on something really sensitive don't know,

it is by definition an illegal operation.

Therefore it doesn't need a SCIF.

It doesn't need, in fact, it's like affording,

here's what it's like, it's like affording the mafia

a SCIF privilege because
someone exposing the mafia

could only talk about that in a SCIF.

Because it's an illegal and criminal operation,

it isn't worthy of a SCIF.

So I've been telling Mr. Burchett, and Ms. Luna,

and Moskowitz, and other members of Congress

that that's a completely wrong approach

because it's missing the
fundamental basis of the problem.

And the fundamental basis of the problem is that

in the late '50s, these projects and operations

went off the reservation
of constitutional legality

and then went off on their own.

And therefore, they've been
a criminal enterprise frankly,

since the late 1950s.

And to my knowledge, there's been no period of time

between the late '50s and now

where these projects have had proper oversight

from either the executive branch,

meaning the president or Congress.

And for that reason, they can't then wrap themselves

in the cover of a top secret operation.

You can't have it both ways, right?

You're either on the side of the law or you're not.

And if not, which we can prove they are,

you strip 'em of all that cover.

So that's the first thing
that the incoming president

and the Congress should learn and do.

- Tim Burchett just made a statement a few moments ago

saying that he's looking over his shoulder now

and he is afraid that maybe his car might explode.

Like somebody might be attempting on his life.

How dangerous are these
congressmen that are pushing it?

How dangerous is it for the witnesses

to come forward at this moment in time?

- Well, it is very dangerous

and of course, I've seen
that experienced at firsthand

as you know.

But I'm not sure that someone like Mr. Burchett,

so far, they're not digging into this

at a level that would be a threat.

Now, when I spoke to him a few months ago,

if he had gotten subpoena power

where you would then be subpoenaing people

who we can point out or involved directly,

very deeply in these operations, we have 'em, maybe.

But this beggars the question we've been asking

since the early '90s that there
should be witness protection

as well as serious security around them.

Now here's some news,

there's a law enforcement special access project

that I've been working with that has just informed me

that they can extend protection
and immunity to witnesses.

So anyone who would have a concern like that

should contact me and will
put them in that bubble, right?

And the people who are the operators,

the special operators in there

are people who have been
Green Beret, special forces guys,

but now they're working under a law enforcement,

domestic special access project that's top secret,

special compartment information.

And they are there to get to the bottom of this.

But they can now extend,
like if someone comes forward

and they know they were
involved in some illegal operations,

they can extend immunity
and they can extend protection.

So that is a very big development

that I don't believe the people
in Congress are aware of.

But of course, it's always a dramatic thing.

Could someone be killed doing this?

Yes, a lot of people have been
killed doing what we're doing

and most of the people know that.

And I have just heard
recently from a senior official

who had been the sort of
right hand for senate intelligence

for Marco Rubio, who looks like he'll be the Secretary

of State, that he didn't wanna push too far on this

'cause he was literally terrified of the CIA.

That there were compartmented operations in there

that could make a lot of
problems for him or endanger him.

But when you hear something like that,

this is why the president as well as Congress

need to leapfrog over this kind of slow role,

misdirect disclosure effort
and really get to the conclusion

that these are criminal operations.

They should be treated that way.

They should be rounded
up, arrested, tried for treason

or what we had written in
the senate intelligence bill

that was passed by Senate,

then gutted by some operatives in the Congress,

have a period of amnesty or safe harbor.

And that was six months, right?

That was gonna be provided that wasn't passed,

it was taken outta the bill.

Now, the incoming president can do that

and this special access project on its own

'cause it's a law enforcement entity

can extend immunity, right?

But standing up enough
resources for the kind of security

we're talking about, I've done this naked

with no security from the government

and all my whistleblowers are in that bag, situation.

Which creates a big problem

because if you're gonna provide that,

you also have to be able to back it up with funding.

And that funding needs to
come out of an executive order

or a congressional act, one of those two.

It can come either way.

Now the Congress,

when they were proposing
to move this forward last year,

about a year ago when the
National Defense Authorization Act

was gutted in the reconciliation

between the Senate and the house,

that all those provisions were taken out, right?

Including this amnesty period.

They called it safe harbor, same thing.

I think now since there are people in Congress

who block those initiatives

and we know who they are by the way.

You know, there are people like McConnell,

and Congressman Rogers of the House Armed Services,

and Congressman Turner of
the House Intelligence Committee.

We know who the people were who stepped in

and gutted that Senate bill

that passed overwhelmingly, right?

And the provision I'm talking about

unanimously passed out of the
Senate Intelligence Committee.

'Cause I was involved in reviewing the language of it

with some of those people.

So I think that at this point
it may fall on the shoulders

of the incoming president
to learn enough about this

to issue the correct executive orders

to provide that kind of protection.

And also, if someone has a
reason to be concerned like that,

then that person, there should be surveillance

around that person and see if there is any threat.

And whatever that threat is,

those people are rounded
up and arrested immediately.

For example, last year I had the former chairman

of a large corporation, household name in America

who knew of some compartment
operation at that company

dealing with this issue.

He wanted to come forward.

Immediately, there were people
who approached him and said,

you know, your children and your grandchildren,

your whole family might be killed if you do this.

It was a direct threat.

And so he backed off from coming forward.

And so someone like that who's an extreme,

and he has documents, he
has schematics of the designs

of these craft and everything,

those people need to be very rigorously protected.

And also then, even if they're afraid to come forward,

they should be either subpoenaed

or in law enforcement taken in and interrogated.

And you cannot lie to a federal officer, right?

Without it being a felony.

So we know who these people are.

I've got 762 of them in my archive.

- So if you had the choice

and you were the head of this hearing,

who would be a first eye witness that you would call?

- Oh, I don't know, I've talked to so many of them.

I'd be really hesitant to call any of them

'cause a lot of people are afraid of being humiliated.

I've had some personal friends of mine

that have had sightings back in the '50s.

One was a fellow I know that was in the Navy at the time.

And it was a pretty compelling story.

And I feel like somebody
like that would be excellent

because they're just a good old boy, so to speak,

that was serving his country

and was told to keep his mouth shut

or he would face going to federal penitentiary

for the rest of his life.

- All this has been illegal since 1956.

It doesn't fall under the constitution.

If the president and the Congress

are being held from this information,

they have the right to come forward

because there is no legal recourse towards them

because it's all an legal operation.

So people shouldn't be afraid of coming forward

at this point.

- That sounds good, but she talked to the pilots

who are pulled off the flight line

who are supposedly debriefed,

but they're really interrogated for hours on end.

They have a mark on their records.

And again, they're pulled off the flight line

where they're not flying for a while.

They'll have a psychological examination

and things like that, and
that usually dissuades pilots.

You hear 'em all the time,

airline pilots saying they saw something

but are afraid to come forward because again,

they don't want to have to go through all the hassle.

- There are rumors that have come up to the Hill

of a secretive project within
the Department of Defense

involving the manipulation of human genetics

with what is described as
non-human genetic material,

potentially for the enhancement
of human capabilities,

hybrids, are any of you familiar with that, yes or no?

- No ma'am.

- I'm not ma'am.

- I'm not.

- No ma'am.

- [B. Cousins] What do they mean about biologics

and hybrid engineering of humans?

- Well, you know, the whole question about the spectrum,

let's call it, of covert operations

dealing with this subject
runs the gamut from genetic

and biological to very advanced technologies.

It's just called AT, at Lockheed or Northrop Grumman.

But the genetic part of it,
we disclosed this in the '90s.

What she's talking about is
that they have taken material,

genetic material and created,
and where she's confused,

they've created the creatures that look like aliens

that aren't, that have been involved in abductions,

but also in some special
operations and in deception.

So this gets into a very deep end of the pond of,

how do you set up a believable false flag,

an operation that looks like it's alien when it isn't?

Now, I said back in the '90s

that the first cloned mammal or higher life form

was not dolly de sheep in Scotland a few decades ago.

Those programs have been going on since the '60s, '70s,

'80s, in these covert
programs dealing with this issue.

And very high tech.

Now result of it, some people have called these men

who worked in a facility in the United Kingdom,

at Peasemore air force base,

they were called program life forms.

So they are these sort of like creatures.

They're not human and they're not extraterrestrial,

but they're manmade

and they pass very, very well as an alien.

Now, fast forward to the use of those

on things that look like a UFO, right?

And these are, it can be circular, or octagonal,

or triangular aircraft that are anti grav.

And everyone who would see one,

including the president members of Congress,

that's an alien craft.

It's not, it came outta the Lockheed Skunk Works,

or Raytheon, or Northrop and onboard some of them

in certain operations or these fake aliens

that engage in these abductions and mutilations.

And this is the core of the whole scam,

is a long-term psychological warfare program

to convince people there's a threat from outer space.

That's what Wernher von Braun said.

The guy who invented the rocket for Adolf Hitler,

on his deathbed, said that to Carol Rosin.

And we warned that this is
where we were going with this.

So here's the big problem.

There's a truthful disclosure

that unpacks all the deception.

And then there's the fake disclosure

like you saw this week up on Capitol Hill, all right?

And the fake disclosure is actually engineered

to bring the subject out,

but within the context of it being a threat.

Well, the only threat, I mean,

if they were extraterrestrial threat, we'd be done.

The only real threat is from this illegal

covert organization that have technologies,

thousands of years more advanced

than the mainstream government military have,

but also have these other technologies,

genetic, electromagnetic, warfare devices

that affect consciousness and what have you.

Kind of like the Havana
Syndrome, but much more advanced.

So you have a group of unsupervised people

that have this whole
constellation of technologies

that are being used in malicious ways

and they're clearly illegal.

And this is why this has to get unwound and stood down.

Very, very important.

And we haven't begun to scratch the surface

of what the real threat is.

'Cause the real threat consists of two other things.

One is that that organization has had the ability

since the '60s to hit a button

and simulate an alien attack on the planet

using these technologies.

And it would trick everyone at the Pentagon,

the White House and the Congress

'cause they don't know much about this subject.

- Serious questions that I'd admit,

a growing number of drone
sightings in the northeast

after weeks of mysterious drones.

- The FBI says, it's investigating a series

of possible drone flights.

People on the ground across Central Jersey

have reported them over the past several days.

- The drones have been described as larger

than what a hobbyist might fly.

- They made kind of a low hum,

similar to what you would expect from a plane,

a smaller plane.

- Some of the drones have been spotted

close to a military installation

and president-elect Trump's Bedminster golf club

where he frequently stays.

- What's going on with these drones?

Everybody wants to get your opinion.

- They are now launching

what we had predicted in the late 1990s.

And that is a series of
diversionary false flag events

to confuse the public, and the politicians,

and the Pentagon.

- Tonight, the Pentagon
striking down unverified claims

made by one lawmaker that
Iran is behind those drones.

- Our initial assessment here
is that these are not drones

or activities coming from a
foreign entity or adversary.

- The drones are a predictable
launch of a diversionary

and a confusing event.

They're certainly not extraterrestrial or NHI,

the pop culture now is non-human intelligence.

- The government knows what is happening.

Look, our military knows where they took off from.

If it's a garage, they can go right into that garage.

They know where it came from and where it went.

And for some reason they don't want to come.

And I think they'd be better off saying what it is.

Our military knows and our president knows,

and for some reason they
want to keep people in suspense.

- And this is a problem

because there's been no
serious inquiry in the Congress

or at the White House involving this.

That's what we're gonna hand
off to the incoming president,

it's what I've handed off to members of Congress.

But they don't have any full-time staff to study it.

So it goes, they don't have time to do a deep dive.

So you really have to have a select committee

in the Congress and a special
office in the White House

to really master all this information and unpack it,

and then take the action

to stand down these malicious programs.

And that is gonna be a very heavy lift

and a very dangerous operation.

The other part of this are
things that they can do to cause

and induce all kinds of geophysical changes.

And those technologies are real.

There's one, the NOC I guess I call him,

the non-official cover, who's
inside these black projects.

I had known about and he confirmed a program

where they were able, these covert programs

using these advanced technologies

were able to move an
asteroid that was in the position

from the sun so it wouldn't be seen soon enough,

that would skim over the
Atlantic and Pacific oceans

that would cause massive tsunamis

and wipe out the coastlines all around the world.

And the ET civilizations intercepted this

and avoided that catastrophe.

So when you think of the psychotic level

of people in these covert programs

who have these kind of powerful technologies,

that no one at NASA or JPL know about

and the president doesn't know about,

that is an existential threat
to humanity and to the earth.

And they have got to be reigned in by the rule of law.

But it's gonna take some really courageous people,

whether it's the president,

so far, there's no one who's really been ready

to run with this in that Congress on a deep way,

a meaningful way.

But maybe the incoming president will.

If not, asymmetric disclosure will happen

where we'll have to have a band of brothers

and sisters who do this unilaterally.

- But then you add in the fact that people have died

and now they've turned it over to private entities,

quasi government corporations
that have been created

and that have profited off this knowledge.

And you'll never be able to get to it

because the the line is clearly
broken by someone dead.

So the only way you're gonna get to it

is somebody at that executive level that says,

enough is enough, cut the money off,

bring these people in, let's go.

- [B. Cousins] What's it gonna take to expose all of this?

- It is going to have to be an asymmetric disclosure

where people come forward
with the proof of these materials

and operations.

And those are disclosed not into the black hole

of secrecy at the Pentagon, right?

Or some SCIF, it's disclosed to the people.

- News Nation working to
uncover the mystery in our skies

revealing brand new video
of an alleged UFO retrieval.

Take a look at your screen.

Footage that was never before seen

until last night's special report going viral today.

But now this decorated Air Force veteran

says he knows it's true because he was a part of it.

The whistleblower claiming he was contracted

as a helicopter pilot

to retrieve all kinds of crashed craft.

He says, some of non-human origin.

- And President Trump has said on day one,

we will get a report on the drones.

- [Reporter] At some point,

will you use your powers of the presidency

to tell Americans who are concerned about drones?

- Yeah, oh good, yeah, I will.

- [Reporter] Can you tell us now?

- In fact, I'd like to know because I just got here.

- [Reporter] What do you think though?

- I just came here.

I've been here for what, 15 minutes now.

I would like to find out what it is and tell the people.

- [Reporter] And can you commit to some kind of...

- In fact, I'd like to do that.

Could we find out what that was, Susie?

Okay?

Yeah, why don't we find out immediately.

- We want our leaders to do something.

We're supposed to be in a democracy, right?

And there's a window for us
to do this, while these programs

are still under an illegal operating status.

Now, if they were to cross into legal oversight

by the Congress and the
president, you couldn't do this.

But see, this is the trap they've set for themselves

in this cabal of sociopaths
running these covert programs.

They set their own trap by going illegal,

now they have no cover.

So a group like ours, the disclosure Project,

and these defectors can
do it, legally with no criminal

and no national security violations.

'Cause those programs are being run illegally.

They don't have the cover of national security.

So there's a window open here to move through.

(upbeat music)