All language subtitles for The.Good.Wife.S07E18.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H.264-VietHD_track3_[eng]

(sighs)

So, Greek Orthodox, huh?

I'm just curious.

Yep.

For how long?

Long time.

Your parents?

Yeah, I have parents.

Were your parents
Greek Orthodox?

Yeah.

So you believe in God?

Yep.

You believe
he's watching us now?

Yeah.
So you believe

this is
fornication.

First two were.

The last one-- I don't know
what I would call that.

(both chuckle)

Does it bother you?

A bit.

Oh, no.

This fallen woman
is dragging you down.

You know
what's weird?

I'm more judgmental
about my daughter's Christianity

than yours. Why is that?

I don't know.

You're a bad person.

I don't want you to feel
like you're doing wrong

when you're with me.

Yeah, you do.
(chuckles)

(chuckles)
Yeah, I guess I do.

(Jason groans)

(chuckles)
(phone ringing)

ALICIA:
What time is it?

It is ten after 9:00.

(grunts)
It's probably Diane.

(grunts)

Yep.

Hey, Diane.

Yes.

Okay. I'll see you there.

Court?

Yeah. Another Dipple case.

Privacy this time.

Mm.
Don't get up.

I want to picture you in my bed.

All day.

Just eating bonbons,
watching daytime TV.

You have a
nice day, dear.

♪ ♪
(birds chirping)

DIANE:
This is the footage

taken from
Ms. Hamm's drone?

Yes, that's
my understanding.

And that, that is your house
right there, isn't it?

Yes. 1547 Oakmont.

Did you grant permission
for the drone to fly over it?

No. Absolutely not.

And how often
does it do that?

Every day. Sometimes
several times a day,

at unpredictable times.

WOMAN: It has to be
unpredictable.

That's the basic principle
of security sweeps.

(bangs gavel)
Ms. Hamm, please.

Your lawyer will argue for you.

And, uh, why is the drone such

a problem for you?
Well, it's
my business.

I'm a therapist.
I practice out of my house.

And do your patients complain?

Yes.
Some have even quit.

They depend on me for
privacy and they get this--

surveillance.
And that is
why you're suing

the owner of the drone?
Yes.

Her drone has led
to my business losses.

DIANE: Thank you.
Nothing more.

(quietly):
Look at her.
Do patients

park in your garage,
Dr. Nachmann?
My garage?

No. I turned that
into my office.

I see. Then do patients enter
your garage office

through a covered walkway?

No.

So they park on the street,
then walk

up to your house,
where anyone

who happens to be around
could see them?

Yes.
How is that different

from being observed
by a drone?

Well, I guess you expect it
from someone on the street

but not from the sky.

And how much are you suing
my client for, sir?

$300,000.

And yet you have

two top partners
at your table.

Objection, Your Honor.

I haven't even gotten
to my question yet.

Why don't we wait
till she gets to her question,

then I'll sustain.

I used to work for their firm,
Your Honor.

And this case
wouldn't even be considered

unless there was
an ulterior motive.
Objection, Your Honor.

That has nothing to do
with this case.
But it does, Your Honor.

This case is a fiction.
It is a trial balloon sent up

by Reese Dipple,
a reactionary billionaire

who thinks that
we are out to take
Your Honor, she is trying

their guns,
their Christmases,
to play to your bias.

and the sanctity
of their homes.
Yes. And yet...

we have to deal with the case
in front of us.
I agree.

I just wish the plaintiffs
were more honest.

Well, this is
a surprise.

When did you come back
to the law?
A month ago.

Zoe started nursery school.

Is that your daughter?
Yes.

Oh, my God,
she's beautiful.

So you're happy?

I am.

And you're
good in court.

How did you know it was Dipple?

It was a guess.

Two partners on this case,
it made no sense.

I learned from the best.

(crowd cheering on TV)
(lock clicking)

Is my wife here?

She's in court.

You're her investigator?

Yeah.

(mug shattering)

We are still married.

I'll get my things.

Yeah, that would be good.

How long has this been going on?

(zipping)

That's a question for Alicia.

Does Grace know?

Again...

Alicia.

You're in my way.

You're screwing my wife

and I'm in your way?

At the moment, yes.

I should kick
your ass.

You could try.

And then what?

(juicer whirring)

One Goji-gasm
with a virility boost!

Good luck with that.

I know who you are.

And I know who you are.

So we can skip the part where
you pretend you want to date me.

What can I help you with, sir?
You can help me put
Peter Florrick in jail.

How 'bout a Super-C
Quencher instead?

Well, I can subpoena you to
testify against your father.

Okay, here's the thing:
I am nobody.

My last five jobs,
I needed to wear name tags.

I live with three roommates,
and one is a squatter.

This has nothing to do with me.
So you and your little...

FBI friend should take
your show somewhere else.

"Judge Schakowsky
won't be a problem."

"How can you be sure?"
"He owes me. He'd be in jail

right now on bribery charges
if I hadn't warned him."

Hi, this is Marissa
from the juice bar.

We need mall security.
There's a man here

harassing employees,
who refuses to leave.

I want you
to give your father a message

from me, Ms. Gold.
I don't know. Let me ask him.

How tall are you?
Tell him he
has two choices.

He can testify
against Peter Florrick,

or I can use your testimony
to put him in jail

for obstruction
of justice.

Looks like 5-11,

dark hair,
kind of a mean look in his eye.

Wait, I think
he's leaving.

Thanks.

DIANE:
Howard!

(grunts)

How can I be of service?

We need you to move offices.

Why? I like this office.

It's close to the bathroom.

You're emeritus, Howard.
And this is

a high profile,
very visible space.

Where clients can get
a good look at your...

your work ethic.

DIANE: We have a space
on the 27th floor.

It's all arranged.
27th floor?

That's for losers.

This isn't a
negotiation, Howard.

And who, uh, may I ask,
am I being evicted for?

Alicia.

Alicia. Of course.

It's all beginning
to make sense.

All right. I need
to get to court.

But, please,
let's get this moving.

So you're, uh...

throwing in with
the girls, huh?

I'm not "throwing in"
with anyone, Howard.

I'm just trying to do
what's best for the firm.

Mm.
(zipping)

We've had problems
with mail theft,

bikes gone missing,
a car vandalized.

So that's when
you bought the drone

and started
PicketFenceWatch.com?

Yes. It's too big an area
for volunteers to secure,

so the drone makes it
easier to monitor.

Have any of your other neighbors
complained about your drone?

Or is it just Dr. Nachmann?

MS. HAMM:
No. People love it.

Thank you, Ms. Hamm.
Being a mother myself,

I can understand the worth
of such a safety tool.

Objection.
Counselor is testifying.

Actually, my apologies,
I thought I was just reacting.

Really? Is that what a reaction
sounds like?

Yes, the same way
you're reacting now.

JUDGE DUNAWAY:
Excuse me. Please let me

rule on the objection.

Sustained.

Nothing further,
Your Honor.

So why not just fly it over
your other neighbors' houses

and leave Dr. Nachmann alone?
Avoiding his house

would mean not covering a lot
of other people who want it.

But by "covering" this area,
you mean not just

the public area,
like the street,

you also look
into people's backyards.
I have to.

Criminals don't just use
the front door.
Do you ever

pick up images
from inside their houses?

No.
Is that a person there,

inside their house?
I guess.

Did that person
give you permission

to photograph them?
I would never upload

anything like that
to the site.
Your Honor,

this is a clear case
of intrusion upon seclusion.

It is well-established
that a person

has a reasonable expectation

to privacy in his own home.

CAITLIN: No, it is a clear
case of Reese Dipple trying

to create law. Look!
Your Honor!

The expectation
of privacy

is in relation
to government surveillance.

If Dr. Nachmann
simply uses some discretion

by pulling his blinds...
He shouldn't have to.

Your Honor, we have to weigh
the minor inconvenience

to Dr. Nachmann
against the significant

public interest
in preventing crime.

So we do.
DIANE: The incursions

into our privacy
are already so severe, Judge.

As much as I despair
and sympathize

with our privacy
being trampled on

by new technologies,
the facts

in this case
simply don't warrant abridging

Ms. Hamm's
First Amendment rights.

Dr. Nachmann, your petition

for a declaratory
judgment is denied.

The drone can fly.
(bangs gavel)

What the hell are you doing?

Not you.
I'll call you back.

I've been booted.

Exiled to the 27th floor.

For doing what?

Nothing.
Make room for Alicia.

The next step in Diane's push

for an all-female-led firm.

Diane pushed,

but the Gerbil... stood by--
he never said a word.

Cary's in on this?
First she came
for the young guys,

then the older guys.

Pretty soon... there won't be
anybody left to speak for you.

(sighs quietly)

(intro to "Burn One Down" plays)
(sighs): Ah...

♪ Let us burn one ♪

♪ From end to end ♪

♪ And pass it over ♪
Are you all right?

♪ To me, my friend ♪

♪ Burn it long ♪
You seem a little out of it.

♪ We'll burn it slow... ♪

Just tired.

Well, why don't you go home?

(sighs)

No.

Well, maybe in a little while.

♪ 'Cause I'm gonna burn ♪

♪ One down ♪

♪ Yes, I'm gonna burn... ♪

It's been a weird time,

huh?

What do you mean?

Us jumping from firm to firm.

♪ ♪

All the changes.

It was easier
when we started out.

Well...

yeah.

Not necessarily better.

♪ ♪

Go home, Cary. Take a nap.

An afternoon off
isn't gonna change anything.

♪ And if you're
causing no harm ♪

♪ Then you're all right
with me ♪

♪ If you don't like my fire ♪

♪ Then don't come around ♪

♪ 'Cause I'm gonna... ♪

(gunshot)

CAITLIN:
That's your client.

We're countersuing.

That drone was
an $80,000 prototype.

And we'll
assess punitive.

See you in court, then.

Your offices look
great, by the way.

(wry laugh)

(door opens, closes)

Dipple won't back our client
after that, will he?

I don't know.
The doctor has good aim...

and Reese Dipple loves
the Second Amendment.

(door unlocking)

ALICIA:
Sorry I'm late.

Jason?

(phone beeps on)

Hey, this is Jason.
Leave a message.

Hey. Where are you?

I'm alone here.

Call me when you get this.

(starts engine)

♪ ♪

I'm just saying,
he knew details.

What kind of details?
He had a transcript

of an entire phone conversation
you and I had.

About?
Judge Schakowsky.

He... What?

How you tipped that judge off
about the FBI sting.

The only way he could know that

is if he had a wiretap
in the governor's office.

Is he insane?

He's like an evil Boy Scout.

He said he wants you to testify
against Peter

at the trial.
Wait...

did he say "trial"
or "grand jury"?

"Trial," I think.
Is that important?

If he said "trial,"
that means he knows

he's gonna get an indictment.

He definitely said "trial."

Damn it!

(taps button)
CAITLIN: That's you shooting
the drone down, isn't it?

Yes. That is me.
Your Honor, we request
an immediate judgment

as a matter of law--
Dr. Nachmann just admitted

to violating
your ruling.

Your Honor, you said
the drone could fly.

You didn't say Mr. Nachmann
couldn't protect his property.

Oh, come on.
Is that an objection?

No, it's an expression
of amazement.

Show me in the
order where...

No one needs
to spell it out.

No one did spell it out.
And by analogy

to the rule of lenity...
Oh, lenity. Where
are we going next,

Expressio Unius?
Oh, well,

now that you mention it...
Your Honor, please,

isn't it implicit in your order

not to shoot at
my client's drone?

Why?

It's illegal
to discharge a firearm

in Chicago but not in Oak Park.

It's not the weapon
we're objecting to.

It's the target.

We ask for compensatory damages
in the amount

of $80,000, and $10,000
in punitives,

along with a clear instruction
from the court

that the defendant
may not shoot drones

out of the sky.
Actually, Your Honor,
I would like an opportunity

to examine him first.
He's already admitted

to shooting it down.
But he didn't admit
to doing anything wrong.

May I?
By all means.

Dr. Nachmann, did you feel
threatened by the drone

flying over your house
yesterday?

Yes. I did.
Threatened?

Seriously?
Did you believe
it was making

a violent, riotous,
or tumultuous assault?

Yeah, with all the noise
and the hovering, absolutely.

Oh, this is ridiculous.
Did you believe

what you did was necessary
to repel the drone?

Very much so.
720 ILCS

5/7-2 allows the use of force
in defense of one's dwelling.

Castle doctrine?
You're applying Castle doctrine?

Your Honor, this is
still about Mr. Dipple's

libertarian fantasies...
Again, the plaintiff
is attempting to provoke bias.

Castle doctrine allows
the use of force

to the extent necessary
to terminate or prevent

unlawful entry.
Are you saying
Dr. Nachmann

thought the drone was going
to enter his home?

Drones are capable of doing more
than record video, Your Honor.

They can steal,
interfere with,

and destroy things
inside the house

without ever entering.

The drone overflight was
a de facto intrusion,

which means
Castle doctrine applies.

Honestly...
is that a reasonable fear?

No!
Yes!

Then prove it.
(bangs gavel)

You just sat there
and let Diane

beam Alicia up to our floor?

Do you realize that the camel's
nose is already in our tent...

That was the lesser
of two evils.

What's the other evil?

Having a pantless octogenarian
scaring away clients.

We're name partners,
David.

Nobody can move us out.

Together we have more equity

in this place than
Diane does. And...

if we have to play
that trump card...

so be it.
I don't know

if you're confident or covering,

but I do know this:
this is war.

And before the women
make their next move,

we need to fire a shot
across their bow.

(automatic gunfire)

Mr. Pert, what are
we seeing there?

An unmanned
aircraft system--

drone, in common parlance--
modified to carry

AR-15 machine gun.
With all due respect,
Dr. Nachmann would have known

if Ms. Hamm's drone
was carrying a machine gun.

Thank you,
Your Honor.
But drones can carry more

than just machine guns,
can't they?
Absolutely.

(gunshot)
ALICIA: Did that drone

have a handgun
attached to it?

PERT:
A Beretta Pico.

Only about five inches long.
Drones can be fitted

to carry virtually any weapon.
Okay,

uh, this is, uh, entertaining,

but I'm not sure
why it's relevant.

It's not.
DIANE: The havoc
that drones

can wreak isn't limited
to weapons, is it, Doctor?
No.

It's almost impossible to tell
unless you take it apart,

but this drone has a camera
that does thermal imaging.

Now, this drone looks like
a basic hobbyist's toy,

when, in fact,
it's equipped with a...

Wi-Fi router that
tricks your computer
into connecting with it.

DIANE: And what happens
when they connect?

It steals
your personal
data: contacts

bank information.
CAITLIN: I think it's
been established that

my client's drone has none
of these modifications.

Yes, but our client
had no way of knowing.

Isn't that right, Doctor?
Drones can
absolutely intrude

on a person's home
without entering it.

If that's what Dr. Nachmann said
he was afraid of, he's smart.

CAITLIN: You study and
develop drone technology

at Chicago Polytech,
is that right?

Yes.
Would that include
the study

of flight paths
and trajectories?

Yes, of course.
Now, if you could tell me,
before my client's drone

is shot out of the sky,
is it hovering

in a stationary position,

or moving toward
Dr. Nachmann's home?

Well, that drone actually looks
like it's flying

away from the house.
So even if Ms. Hamm's
drone had attempted

a violent or illegal intrusion,
it was in fact retreating.

And under Illinois law,
including the Castle doctrine,

it is illegal to shoot
an intruder in the back

if he, or in this case it,
is retreating.

(whispers):
Damn.

(sighs):
Yep.

She's right on the law.

Damages in the amount of $10,000
are awarded to Ms. Hamm.

Dr. Nachmann... don't
shoot at drones.

Nice office.

It's very comfortable.

Thank you.
Terrific.

Because I think you're gonna
be in here for a while.

I need examples
where a pre-nup

was deemed invalid due to...
unconscionable terms.

Okay. Illinois, right?

Illinois, but I want to be
belt-and-suspenders on this.

Let's make it a
50-state survey.

Great.
Uh, but Alicia has asked me

to finish this
business development plan.

Let me give you three reasons
why I don't care.

Number one:
I outrank Alicia.

Numbers two
and three:

they don't matter,

because I outrank Alicia.

Your intimidation tactics
may have worked on my daughter,

but they will
not work on me!

Hello, Eli.
Would you like

to sit down?
You do not want the
Inspector General,

let alone The New York Times,
to learn that you put

a wiretap in the office
of a sitting governor!

Will you please
give us a second?

(clears throat)

I didn't tap his office, Eli.

I tapped your daughter's phone.

You wh...
Yep. Awful, huh?

The lengths an AUSA will go
to arrest someone

who simply does something...
criminal.

(chuckles)

She worked for

Lloyd Garber,
who I was investigating,

so I had probable cause.
My daughter knows

nothing about
anything illegal

Lloyd Garber or
Peter Florrick did...

may have done.

Agreed. But she
does have knowledge

of something illegal you did.

You're squeezing my
daughter to get to me.

I'm not a big fan
of the word "squeezing," but...

yes.
I know nothing

about the Locke mistrial.

Good. Then you have
nothing to worry about.

(sighs):
Look...

you have a choice,
a simple choice.

Help me take down
Peter Florrick,

or your daughter
helps me take you down.

Hey.

All right, then,

I will see you tomorrow.

No, just a few questions.

Thank you.

Hey.

What are you doing
working up here?

I don't know.
It's quieter.

I missed you last night.

Just... work.

Well, what are you
doing tonight?

Look, Alicia...

I like you.
I like you a lot.

Seriously?

What do you want me to say?

I don't want you
to say anything. I want you

to do what you did
the other day.

I want you...
(talking, laughter nearby)

MAN (laughing):
She was...
Can you give us a minute?

Please?

MAN:
Just to make sure we get...

We'll move it out
in the hallway here.

I want to use you
and I want you to use me.

This is purely sexual.

I like it, too.

Is this about your religion?

No.

Because I don't
want your spirit.

I want your body.

It's not about that.

Then what?

Your husband came home
yesterday morning.

Oh, God.

What?

Look, whatever he said,

whatever he did, it has
nothing to do with us.

I just don't like
coming in the middle

of something.
We'll meet
at your place tonight.

No. It's not really...
Well, then we'll
go to a hotel.

Side of the road.
Backseat of my car.

(door opens)

I'm seeing you tonight.
At my apartment.

After that, you can
do whatever you want.

CAITLIN:
Alicia, how are you?

Peachy.

Your client shot down
another drone.

(elevator bell dings)
This time, not with a gun,

but with an electronic device
called a Drone Dropper.

Alicia, you need
to talk to your client.

I don't need to do anything.

♪ ♪

PETER:
Uh...

Alicia, I'm a little
busy here.

Give me a second.

What's going on?

Alicia?

I want a divorce.

I want a divorce.

What's wrong?

Nothing's wrong.

I want a divorce.

Yeah, well, I'm in
the middle of something.

Okay, you take
care of that.

I'll have my lawyer call you.

This is about your
investigator, isn't it?

My investigator?
Mm-hmm

Yes.

I would never think
of divorcing you

unless I had some
other man to call my own.

Come here.
I'm not getting...

(door slams)

I saw him yesterday,

walking around
in his boxer shorts,

acting like he
owned the place.

Yes, because I own the place,

and I told him
he was welcome

to walk around naked
if he wants.

And Grace? Oh, you don't give
a damn about your daughter.

(laughs)

Yes. I'm an unfit mother.
In the divorce,

you can get full custody
for the three weeks

before she goes
to college.

Well, this must be true love.

Again.

Is that what
would upset you most?

If I was in love?

No, what upsets me
the most

is that you're shoving it
in my face.

I'm not shoving anything.

This is me not caring.

Not caring what people think.

What Eli thinks.
You think.

Or what the FBI thinks.

You know I'm about to be
indicted, don't you?

Peter, you're always
being indicted.

If it weren't today,
it would be tomorrow.

I'll have my lawyer call.

Thanks.

♪ ♪

DIANE:
You told Dr. Nachmann
not to shoot a drone,

so he brought it down
safely and he returned it.

JUDGE DUNAWAY:
Well, was the drone returned
to Ms. Hamm in one piece?

CAITLIN:
It was, but...

JUDGE DUNAWAY: Why are you
bothering me with this?

He gave the drone back,
it wasn't damaged.

CAITLIN:
Because it's against the law.

FAA rules prohibit
interfering

with the operation of
an aircraft midflight,

including by disabling it.
Your Honor...

18 U.S.C. 32 applies to
airplanes and helicopters.

Not unmanned drones.

Actually, the law applies
to any aircraft in the

special aircraft jurisdiction
of the United States.

JUDGE DUNAWAY:
And are drones

in the special aircraft division
of the United States?

BOTH:
No!
Yes.

CAITLIN:
Drones must be registered

with the FAA.

DIANE:
But whether that puts them

within FAA jurisdiction
would depend on

the height at which
the drone was flying.

And the FAA's draft
regulation on drones

is unclear
on this issue.

Oh, well, then perhaps we should
talk to someone from the FAA.

(sighs)

(elevator bell dings)

If Peter sent you...

He didn't.

Well, what do you need?

Can I talk to you?

Privately?

DIANE:
Uh, certainly.

ELI:
I need a lawyer.

You do? Or Peter does?

Peter has
Mike Tascioni.

And this may be
an instance where...

my interests and the
governor's... diverge.

Understood.

So everything I'm about to say

will be covered under
attorney-client privilege?

(indistinct conversation
nearby)

And you can't share
this with Alicia.

I understand.

The Federal prosecutor,
Connor Fox,

is trying to force me to testify
against Peter at trial.

Okay, well, if or when
you're subpoenaed,

you can obviously
take the Fifth.

I'm not worried about
incriminating myself,

I don't know anything.

But the AUSA
doesn't believe that.

No.

Well, if you
truly don't know anything,

why don't you just
get up there and say that?

Here's the problem.

I... told my daughter

something that I did

that may have...

obstructed justice.

And he's going to force Marissa
to testify against you

if you don't help him
take down Peter.

So what do I do?

(indistinct chatter
in distance)

ALICIA:
Hey.

What's up?

I'm hiding.

From who?
David Lee.

He dumped a 50-state
survey on me.

(sighs):
Oh, yeah.

He likes to haze
newcomers.

Mm, it felt like
more than that.

He's probably
feeling threatened.

Diane's...

(indistinct chatter
continuing)

Diane's been aggressive about
this female-led firm idea.

Are we taking over?

I don't know. I don't know
if I have the stomach

for a gender war right now.

Would we make more money?

(chuckles):
Probably.

(knocking)

Hey.

Come on in.

I need your help with something.

(sighs)
Funny thing.

I need yours.
You start.

David Lee is hazing Lucca.
He's got her doing

a pointless 50-state survey
to complete overnight.

Yeah, he did that to me
when I started.

You, too.

Yes, but Lucca was my partner.

And when you convinced me
to come back,

I convinced her.

Okay. Now I have
a favor to ask you....

Sure.

Don't side with Diane.

With what?

You know with what.

Cary...

I'm not a name partner.

But you're a name.

This is none of my business.

It's between
you and Diane.

And you can't take sides?

Okay.

Good to know.

So... you'll help Lucca?

I'll see.

(sighs deeply)

DIANE:
You work for

the Federal Aviation
Administration, Mr. Ortiz?

I do-- the Enforcement
and Compliance Division.

So you're familiar
with the FAA's

proposed regulation
on drones?

It's pretty much
all we're talking about

internally
these days.

Could you explain for us
what Class G

airspace is?

It's the band that
the FAA doesn't control.

It's between zero and 500 feet,

not including approaches
to airports.

And above 500 feet,
it would be illegal

to disable a drone aircraft,

for example, by using a device
such as the Drone Dropper?

That is correct.

But below 500 feet,

that is not
the FAA's jurisdiction?

CAITLIN:
Your Honor, point
of information?

JUDGE DUNAWAY:
Regarding?

United States
v. Causby.

That's C-A-U-S-B-Y,

not...
the other way.
Thank you.

Uh, that case established

that an individual's
property rights include

at least as much of the
airspace above the ground

as one could occupy or use
in connection with the land.

Do we have a number?
83 feet.

Exactly 83 feet?

That was the height below which
the Court found

an airplane flying over
Mr. Causby's land

would frighten his chickens.

Of course.

My client's drone was

at 200 feet and therefore not
on Dr. Nachmann's property.

Your Honor,
this is preposterous.

That's a 70-year-old case.

But still good law.
But it's

hardly applicable to what

we've seen is
cutting-edge technology.

CAITLIN:
The law's the law.

Well, as far as the FAA
is concerned,

if a drone is flying
at 83 feet or below,

Dr. Nachmann would be within
his rights to take it down.

And above 500 feet,
it would be illegal.

And at 200 feet?

Well, it's not clearly
his property at that point,

but it's not clearly... not.

As a representative
of the FAA's legal department,

would you like to clear that up?

No.

Well, we're waiting
to hear from the public

and private sectors before

we regulate
Class G airspace.

So for the time being...

Between 83 and 500 feet,
it's the Wild, Wild West.

I hired an attorney.
A good one.

Glad you passed on all the bad
ones, but what's the plan?

Developing.

It sounds like
you're putting me off.

Don't worry about me.
I'm worried
about me, too.

I'm a small person,
and it would be a lot of guilt

to carry around,
putting you away.

All you have to do
is hold tight and do not

speak to AUSA Fox.

Dad, do you not want to testify

against Peter Florrick
because you don't think

he did anything wrong or are
you still trying to protect him?

DIANE: Wait a minute!
Wait a minute! David!
It's as if you're, as if you are

the only person on the
letterhead. I don't know, Diane.
We... oh...

It's getting really creepy
around here.
All right.

David, just calm down!
I'll tell you...

We all have
the same long-term goals.

World domination.
To turn this

into the premier full-service
law firm

in Chicago.
You mean the premier female-led

law firm.
Listen, we're not gonna ride
into the future

on Howard Lyman's back.
I don't care
about Howard,

but your elevation

of Alicia Florrick...
Makes sense.

She's been back here
for barely a minute

and you have her stepping
over bodies.
Alicia's name

is a big draw
to clients.
You didn't even want her.

I was shortsighted.

Or I was.
Alicia

has weathered
a lot of challenges--

Peter's, her own-- but she
could still be an asset

to this firm,
and that matters to all of us.

DAVID:
Oh, cut the crap!

What's your move?

Make Alicia a name partner.

No.

I can bring this
to the entire partnership.

You think you have the votes?

I think I can get them.

Do you really want to tear

this firm apart
to find out?

So, uh... I don't get
my office back, huh?

Not any time soon.

And there's no way to stop

the estrogen army?

Not without a big fight.

Which you don't want to have.

I'm just not sure
it's worth it.

Well, I will see you

on the 27th floor, pal.

Oh, I'm not
giving up.

I'm just saying there's
other things to consider.

Like what?
Money.

Howard, at the end of the day,

all I want to do
is milk this place

for all it's worth

while it's still standing.

(quiet chuckle)

(door shuts)

I've reconsidered.

You're right.

A rising tide lifts all boats.

I'll support Alicia's elevation
to name partner.

On what condition?

One that I think you'll be happy

to comply with.

(keys jangle)

(sighs)

Hello?

(drops keys onto counter)

Mmm...

Did you eat?
No.

You want something?
No.

(grunting, laughs)
(laughs)

What we have here
is a political hot potato

masquerading as a legal case.

The law has simply not caught up
with technology,

and drones remain-- and I would
suggest frighteningly--

unregulated.

But because any regulation
would require hard choices

between the competing values
of privacy, individual liberty,

and commerce,
neither the legislative

or the executive branch
of the United States

want to make a decision,
so it falls to me.

I'm not thrilled
to say this, but...

drones are not
on private property

above 83 feet.

And you, Dr. Nachmann,

owe the plaintiff punitive and
compensatory damages. That's it.

Well fought.

Thank you.
Your husband is a lawyer, too,

right?
Yes.

How does that work?

Not well.

We're separated.

Oh, my God. I'm...

I'm so sorry.
Yes.

He's in Las Vegas.

It's just Zoe and me.

I guess you were right.

I never should've left.

No.

I wasn't right.

You threw in with Diane.

I'll call you back.

It's just what's
best for the firm.

Isn't that what you told me
when I got sent downstairs?

You let Diane and Alicia

take over and what?

They slip you a few extra shares

to shut up and smile?
Something like that.

Life's a bitch, kid.

(door opens, shuts)

DIANE:
Assistant U.S. Attorney Fox.

Diane Lockhart.
I'm representing

Eli Gold.

What can I do for you?
My client

is here to confess
to obstruction of justice

in the Don Schakowsky
bribery case.

You realize that
potentially comes with it a...

lengthy prison term.

I do.
DIANE: Given Mr. Gold's

willingness to cooperate,

his daughter
Marissa should be

of no further interest to you.

Of course, if you wish
to pursue these charges,

Mr. Gold won't be

of much value as a witness
in any future trials,

including, perhaps,
Peter Florrick's.

Uh, my understanding was that
your client

doesn't know anything about

Governor Florrick's involvement
in the Locke mistrial.

My memory on
that point is... foggy.

I suppose it could
be refreshed.

Only time will tell.

DIANE: So, um, you
tell us, Mr. Fox.

Would you like to hear
Mr. Gold's confession?

Or would you rather wait
and hear his testimony at trial?

Hmm.

(Ben Harper's "Burn One Down"
playing)

♪ Burn it long,
we'll burn it slow ♪

(knocking)
♪ To light me up... ♪

Thank you.

For what?
For making me

a name partner.
It was a surprise.

Don't thank me.
I voted against it.

♪ 'Cause I'm gonna
burn one down... ♪

Is that because of
the conversation we had before?

No. Don't worry.
David Lee voted for you.

He doesn't care anymore.

Cary...
I'm on your side.

I know we've been
at loggerheads before,

but I won't be working
against you.

I know.
Because I'm quitting.

What?

I'm having Diane buy me out.
She...

Why?

I don't like it anymore.

I like being a lawyer.

That can be fun.
But this isn't.

I'm not good at it.

I'm not good
at looking over my shoulder.

I don't want to be my dad.

Cary, you can't just quit.

Yeah, I can.

By the way, I was subpoenaed
in your husband's case.

It's not good.

♪ I'm gonna burn one... ♪

♪ Down... ♪

♪ ♪

♪ If you don't like my fire ♪

♪ Then don't come around ♪

♪ 'Cause I'm gonna
burn one down ♪

♪ Yes, I'm gonna burn one... ♪

♪ Oh... ♪

♪ ♪

(song fades out,
knocking on door)

(sighs softly)

(knocking resumes)

(lock clicking)

Can I come in?

I can't fight now, Peter.

I'm exhausted.
Then let me just talk.

(door shuts)

I'm not here to argue you out
of your divorce.

The kids are grown.

We live apart.
Things have changed.

Good. Thanks.

But I do need to ask you
a favor.

As you know, I'm
being indicted.

But this time, I don't think
it's a false alarm.

I need you to stand beside me
during this.

You can proceed
with the divorce.

Just get everything ready.
I won't contest it.

But...

don't make it public
until afterwards.

I can't have it look like you're
leaving me because I'm guilty.

After that, we'll go
our separate ways.

Live our lives.

See each other
when the kids graduate.

But I need to ask you
this one last favor.

(inhales)

Captioning sponsored by
CBS

Captioned by
Media Access Group at WGBH
access.wgbh.org