All language subtitles for Terrorstorm.-.American.Scholars.Symposium.Edition

A state of war only serves as an excuse for
domestic tyranny. [Alexander Solzhenitsyn]

Our leaders have told us that the
war on terror may last a hundred years,

a new kind of war against a shadowy
enemy that can never be defeated.

Either you're with us
or you're with the terrorists.

Generation after generation
will have to lay down

its liberty in an endless
war for global empire.

It was a breath taking
display of fire power.

...and the Pentagon says: "we
ain't seen nothing yet."

The perfect specter to
convince populations to

relinquish their liberty
in the name of security.

There is no doubt out, that Saddam Hussein
now has weapons of mass destruction.

There is no doubt, that he
is amassing them to use

against our friends, against
our allies, and against us.

And if he does not disarm,
the USA will lead a

coalition and disarm him
in the name of peace.

We've been told that we are
facing a hundred year war,

that will last generation
after generation.

In this film we will explore who
pulls the strings and who benefits

from the darks spectacle
of modern warfare.

We will answer the question: "Do the
people know how they are controlled?"

Do they understand the systems
of power that surround them,

the modern propaganda
machine of public relations

that wash their brains and fill their minds
full of ball games and mindless??? fluff?

Is the population beginning to realize,
that governments throughout history

have used the spectre of fear

to drive their populations into
acquiescing to total tyranny.

September 11, National ID Cards,
Big Brother, the Iraq war,

7/7 bombings in London,
the invasion of Iran,

how they are all interconnected?

In previous films we have focused
predominantly on September 11

as the foundational event, the pretext
for the current geopolitical structure.

The smartest thing to do it's pull it.

And they made that decision to pull and
then we watched the building collapse.

National polls showed, that
most americans and westerners

believe the official story
of 9/11 to be a fraud.

And a large part of that majority
believe that 9/11 was an inside job,

but the establishment press continues to
contest any alternative view concerning 9/11.

In this documentary we will first look at the
historical events that are not contested,

events where the fact of government
sponsored terror is not debated,

but in fact openly admitted to
by western governments.

There are literally 100s of examples of

government sponsored
terrorism in modern history

or what are known as
false flags operations.

We're going to start by looking at
just five past examples,

then we will look at several modern cases.

What is a false flag?

The encyclopedia definition reads: false
flags operations are covert operations,

conducted by governments, corporations
or by other organizations,

which are designed to appear as though
they were carried out by other entities.

The name was derived from the military
concept of flying false colors,

that is flying the flag of a
country other than your own.

There are many variants of
false flags operations,

but one of the most popular carried out by
governments is to stage a terror attack

or horrible criminal incident and
then blame it on your political enemies.

*1933 Hitler storms to power*

One of the best known cases
of false flag operations

was carried out by the newly elected
Adolf Hitler on February 27th 1933.

Nazi documents uncovered
at the end of world war II,

as well as testimony during
the Nuremberg trials,

reveal what many historians
already suspected,

that Hermann Goering had set fire to the
Reichstag, the german parliament building.

The nazi's then produced their patsy,
Marinis Vanderlubbe, an extremely

mentally handicapped young man,
who was found rolling around

an ally behind the Reichstag, naked.

Vanderlubbe was then taken
before a nazi show trial,

found guilty and sentenced to death.

He was beheaded on January 10th 1934.

Using the crisis he had created to
pass laws similar to USA Patriot Act,

Hitler became dictator
and set his sight on the world.

By march on 1939, Hitler had
already seized Checoslovaquia.

Having gained both Austria
and Checoslovaquia,

Hitler desired to move
east against Poland,

but he do not want to
look like the aggressor:

Hitler needed an excuse
for attacking Poland.

It was Heinrich Himmler who
came up with the plan,

thus the operation was code
named Operation Himler.

On the night of August 31, 1939
the Germans took an unknown prisoner

from one of the concentration camps,
dressed him in a polish uniform,

took him to the town of Glewitz on the
German-Polish border, and then shot him.

The staged scene with the dead
prisoner dressed in a polish uniform,

was supposed to appear as a Polish
attack against a German radio station.

German radio, newspapers and news
readers were flooded with images

of what appeared to be a dead Polish soldier
who have dared to attack the Reich.

Now Hitler had his
excuse to invade Poland,

and the nightmare of
World War II had begun.

*1953: Cia Coup in Iran: Operation Ajax*

In 1953 the central intelligence agency,
working in tandem with the MI6,

overthrew the democratically elected
leader of Iran Doctor Mohammed Mossadeq.

Mossadeq had been educated in the west, was
pro America and has driven communism forces

out of the north of his country
shortly after being elected in 1951.

Mossadeq then nationalized the oil fields
and denied British Petroleum a monopoly.

The CIA's owns history
department at CIA.GOV

details how US and British
intelligence agents

carried out terror attacks and then
subsequently blame it on Mossadeq.

In the late 1990's large sections
of operation Ajax were declassified.

The Field Commander of operation Ajax
was none other than the grandson

of president Theodore
Roosevelt: Kermit Roosevelt.

Before his death in 2000,
Roosevelt went public

to the media bragging about his patriotism

in carrying out terrors attacks in Iran
and blaming it on the government.

The provocations included:

Propaganda, demonstrations, bribery, agents
of influence and false flag operations.

They bombed the home of a prominent
religious leader and blamed it on Mossadeq.

They attacked the mosques, machine gunned
crowds and handed out thousands of handbills

claiming that Mossadeq had done it.

Handbills read: up with Mossadeq,
up with communism, down with Allah.

Doctor Mohammed Mossadeq was incarcerated
for the duration of his life.

He fared better than any
of his ministers who were

executed just days after
the successful coup,

for crimes that the MI6
and CIA had committed.

The CIA then formed the dreaded
iranian secret police or SAVAK,

and a 25 years rain of terror
and torture then commenced.

The operation was seen by western
intelligence agencies as a huge success.

The CIA then successfully used the exact
same technique in scores of countries

to overthrow elected governments
and dictators alike.

*1943 - 1983: NATO's Stay Behind:
Operation Gladio*

Operation Gladio was an umbrella
name for literally 100s of bombings

carried out by western intelligence
agencies and NATO in:

Italy, Western Europe, Middle East,
Latin America and Asia.

From 1947 until 1981, Italian presidents
had gone public admitting operation Gladio

targeted innocent civilians and was
to be blamed on lefters and communists.

On November 22, 1990 the
European Parliament

had a resolution condemning
the activities of Operation Gladio.

The former Italian Intelligence Chief has come
clean concerning Gladio's actions as well.

Many other countries have declassified
documents concerning Gladio.

It is part of a public record, that our
government and other western governments

targeted trains, buses, schools.

Several times operatives
zerod in on school buses,

knowing that images of dead children
will get the population hopping mad

and ready to relinquish their liberties.

A particularly bloody bombing, at the
central station of Bolonia (ltaly)

on the morning of August 2, 1980, which
killed 85 people and wounded more than 200,

caused some Italian officials
to break their silence,

and begin to expose just a small
part of this wicked operation.

*1964 The Tonkin pretext*

And now the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

In the summer of 1964, president
Lyndon B. Johnson needed the pretext

to commit the American people
to the already expanding covered war

in south-east Asia.

Three communist PT boats
attacked an American

destroyer at the coast
of Vietnam yesterday,

and today president Johnson's
response was hard and tough.

"To any armed attack upon
our forces we shall reply,

to any in South East Asia who ask our help in
defending their freedom, we shall give it."

In November of 2001, the Lyndon B.
Johnson presidential library and museum

released tapes of phone conversations
with the president

and then defence secretary
Robert MacNamara

where they openly discussed plans to use
the staged Gulf of Tonkin incident

as a pretext to expand the war.

Then in late 2005 the
National Security Agency

declassified its own official
history of the Gulf of Tonkin,

and admitted that
intelligence agency officers

have deliberately skewed the intelligence

and claimed that Vietnamese patrol boats had
attacked US destroyers on August 4th 1964,

when, in reality, they had done nothing
even while being fired on by US forces.

Congress then authorized the
Gulf of Tonkin resolution.

The Tonkin lie paved the
way for 58.000 american

deaths and over 1.5
millions dead Vietnamese.

On October 6, 1976 two
time bombs made of C4

planted on the Douglas
DC8 aircraft exploded,

killing all 73 people on board, in the
most deadly active airline terrorism

on the western hemisphere
until september 11, 2001.

The plane was carrying olympic
athletes from three countries,

including gold medals winners from Cuba.

Declassified FBI and CIA documents show

that the convicted bombers of the flight

had been given US Visas just
days before the attack

and they were in the employ
of the US government.

This have been reported on in
respectable publications for years,

but has now been confirmed
by multiple declassifications.

Cuban plane bomber was CIA agent.
Declassified US government documents show

that a man suspected of involvement in
the bombing of a cuban passenger plane

worked for the CIA:

Luis Posada Carriles.

*1967: USS Liberty Attacked*

In the early 1960's the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff L.L.Limnitzer

concocted the plan for
false flag operations

as a pretext to invade Cuba and
for war with the Soviet Union.

In Operation Northwoods, they planned to
hijack jets by remote control,

crash them, and blame the attack on Cuba.

There were many others
terrorists attacks they planned

to carry out, that were
contained within the document.

One scenario mentioned was
the destruction of a US naval vessel,

that was to be blamed on a foreign power, as
pretext for war with any enemy they picked.

President Lyndon B.Johnson went
operational with Northwoods

on June 8, 1967 during the Six Days War.

During the Six Days War between Israel
and the Arab nations,

the USS liberty was sent
by Johnson to collect

electronic intelligence in
the eastern Mediterranean

The clearly marked US
intelligence ship was 14 miles

off the coast of Israel
in International waters.

A short time after the air
attack had been completed,

the 3 torpedo boats approached us from
our starboard quarter at high speed,

and in an apparent
torpedo launch attitude.

Israeli surveillance aircraft
flew low over the ship

and clearly identified it
as an American vessel.

At 2 p.m. that afternoon, the USS liberty was
attacked by 3 Mirage III fighter bombers.

From the onset of the attack, the
fighter bombers were jamming US signals,

not only were they jamming US signals
specifically, they were also unmarked:

The only unmarked aircrafts
in Israel's arsenal.

The fighter bombers strafed
the ship with their cannons,

dropped conventional ammunitions
and napalm on the ship

repeatedly from stem to stern.

After the Mirages had done their work
the ship was hit by medium bombers,

they saw (unintelligible) carrying napalm and
other ammunitions like White Phosphorus.

The USS Liberty was then attacked by 3
Israeli torpedo boats bearing israeli flags.

The torpedo gun boats opened fire with high
calibre machine guns and launched torpedoes.

A single torpedo struck the ship,
blowing a hole in both sides,

entering the ship and living a
30 foot exit hole when it exploded.

Then the torpedo boats
began strafing life rafts

in the water: an international war crime.

While all of this was happening the oversized
american flag flew clearly above the ship.

The attack on the Liberty went on
for hour after hour after hour.

During the entire attack, the USS Liberty
continually called the Sixth Fleet,

that was nearby, begging
for air support or rescue.

Two aircraft carriers in the Med responded
by launching fighter aircrafts.

Unbelievably they were
recalled by the White House.

Rear Admiral Geiss, then commanding
the carriers in the Sixth Fleet,

called Washington personally
to confirm the recall order.

Secretary of Defense
MacNamara came on the line,

and then president Johnson
himself told Geiss:

"I want that goddamn ship going to the
bottom, no help, recall the wings."

Imagine being admiral Geiss
begging the president

to allow you to defend an American ship

that's under attack and being told by him
that he wants the ship going to the bottom.

Despite the fact that the US
carriers withdrew their help,

a Russian spy ship appeared and
witnessed part of the attack.

After 3 hours into the attack the Israelis
withdrew because there were witnesses,

allowing the damaged USS
Liberty a limp to safety.

Forty years after the attack on the USS
Liberty, we know exactly what happened.

I've interviewed former Chairman of the
Joint Chieff Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer,

I've interviewed the admirals who were on the
line who heard what president Johnson said,

I've even talked to the head
JAG officer of the navy

who was ordered to falsify the reports
and cover up what had really happened.

One of the Israeli pilots
has gone public as well

saying that 3 times he refused over his
radio to headquarters to attack the ship,

saying clearly that it was an American
ship, in International waters and an ally.

He was ordered, under threat of
court martial, to engage the ship.

In a nutshell this is
what happened: President

Johnson had personal control over the ship,

parked it in the Mediterranean,

made a back-room deal with Israel to attack
it, with an order to kill all aboard.

Then the attack on the ship
was to be blamed on Egypt,

the US would enter the war and take
over the entire Middle East.

In the aftermath of the attack on the
most highly decorated ship in US history,

the captain and his entire
crew were told they

would spend life on prison
or would be killed

if they told anyone what happened.

Captain William L. McGonagle was given the
Congressional Medal of Honor in secret

and told not to tell anyone that
he had won the award.

Now that we've looked at
a small cross section

of historical examples of
government sponsored terrorism,

let fast forward to the horrific
attacks on 7/7 in London.

Prime Minister Tony Blair,
leader of the Labour Party

was facing an up hill battle
in parliamentary elections.

National polls showed that his
pro-war party was sure to lose

and then right on time the bombings
of 7/7 and 7/21 occurred.

Within days of the London Bombings,

evidence began to emerge indicating
western intelligence agency involvement.

I've traveled to London from Austin,
Texas, to personally investigate.

Once I've arrived, I was met by Paul
Joseph Watson and his brother Steve Watson

who are reporters of my news website:
www.prisonplanet.com.

To understand the London bombings
and who perpetrated it,

you first need to look at 3/11, 2004:

The Bombings in Madrid, Spain.

Years after the blast that rocked
trains in the city of Madrid, Spain,

the government admits that Al Qaeda
had no connection with the attacks.

Everyone of the supposed bombers

had intimate links with
the Spanish security

services, including the
head of their bomb squad.

The alleged leader of the bombers, who
reportedly gave dynamite to the terrorists

was connected with the Madrid bomb squad

and we see the exact same earmarks, the same
MO (Modus Operandi) in the London bombings

that we witnessed in Madrid.

On the morning of July 7, 2005,
three trains and a city bus

were ripped to pieces when 4 military
grade explosive devices detonated.

At 8.50am, three explosive devices

simultaneously detonated
on 3 separated trains.

Within minutes eyes witnesses
were reporting to the

press that there had been
multiple terror attacks,

despite the fact that 3
train cars were burning

wrecks strewn with dead
and dying Londoners,

Scotland Yard for over an
hour an a half claimed

that all of the disruption
was simply caused

by a power outage in the
London Underground.

Power surge in the Underground.
That's what we heard.

I mean the bus was about an hour
after the Underground so...

that sort of thing that everybody
knew it wasn't what it was, you know,

I mean it was just an excuse,
power surge, whatever...

[Alex] Why would they say
that knowing that it wasn't?

Trying to cover up probably,
you know, I mean,

so that there was no panic, and everybody

could try to get on with
everything, you know, so...

Then, mysteriously, 15 minutes into the
attack the London Police Department orders

the number 30 Hackney to Marbel
Arch bus to leave its normal route

and depart at the corner of
Woolburn Square and Tavistock Place.

At 9.47, a 4th bomb detonates killing
13 civilians and injuring many others.

Note: Out of several hundreds
buses in service that morning,

it's the only bus that
the police take special

control of, and direct to Tavistock Square.

[Paul Joseph Watson] I've
been walking up and down

on this road looking at
the bus stops for N.30.

The bus stops have all the numbers
of the buses on them individually,

there's no N.30 on any of the bus stops.

That's because the N.30 bus was
specifically re-routed here on that day.

[Alex] To simplify,
there's no bus stop here?

[Paul] There's no N.30
bus stop here, no.

[Alex] But that was in the news,
it was specifically diverted here.

[Steve Watson] They admit
the N.30 bus was the only

bus that was directed to
different area or city,

for what reason, nobody
knows, but they admitted it.

So it's very strange that for no reason it

would come down this road
while it was bombed.

Remember while all this is happening
the police are on Radio and TV

telling everyone that is just
a power failure, an outage.

Meanwhile commuters on the bus
were listening others radio reports,

where eye witnesses were
reporting explosions.

The supposed bomber on the
bus with the rucksack

became panicked and began
looking in his rucksack,

in what witnesses said was a
confused and frightened manner.

Weeks later, police detectives
investigating the case

said that all 4 of the
bombers on the 3 trains and

the bus didn't fit the
Modus Operandi of bombers:

They bought two ways tickets, they played
games of cricket the night before,

they had good jobs and happy families.

One of the alleged bombers

was caught by surveillance
camera arguing with

the ticket clerk about
the price of his pass.

After Scotland Yard detectives had a chance
to talk with some of the eye witnesses

from the bus and the trains,
they stated clearly on the record

that they believed that the bombers did not
know they had explosives in their backpacks.

This was only one of many huge
developments on the case

that only received bare mentions
in the back of the newspaper.

The July 29th edition of FOX news
channel's Day Side program revealed

that the so called Mastermind of 7/7
bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat,

was a British Intelligence asset.

Former Justice Department Prosecutor
and FBI terror expert John Loftus

exposes the fact that
Aswat was being protected

by MI6 and was clearly under their control.

[John Loftus] Aswat is believed to be the
mastermind of all the bombings in London.

[Fox] From on the 7/7 and 7/21
this is the guy we think.

[John Loftus] This is the guy
and what is really embarrassing

is that the entire British
police are chasing him

and one wing of the British government,
MI6 with the British secret service

has being hiding him.

And this is of real source of contention

between CIA and Justice
Department in Britain.

[Fox] Hold on John, MI6 has been hiding him,
are you saying he has been working for them?

[John Loftus] Oh, I am not saying it,
this is what the Muslim sheik said

in an interview in a British
newspaper back in 2001.

[Fox] So he's a double agent or what?
[John Loftus] He's a double agent.

[Fox] So he's working for the British trying
to get them information about Al Qaeda,

but, in reality, he's still
an Al Qaeda operative.

[John Loftus] Yes, the CIA
and Israel all accused

MI6 of letting all this
terrorist live in London.

Now we knew about this guy Aswat
back in 1999, he came to America,

the Justice Department wanted to jail
him in Seattle because he and his buddy

were trying to set up a terrorist
training school in Oregon.

The headquarters of the
US Justice Department

ordered the Seattle prosecutors
not to touch Aswat.

[Fox] Hallo! No, hold on! Why?

[John Loftus] Well, apparently Aswat
was working for British Intelligence.

Now, there's a split of opinion
within US intelligence,

some people say that the
British Intelligence fibbed

(lied) to us. They told
us that Aswat was dead.

And that's why the New York
group dropped the case.

That's not what most of the
Justice Department thinks.

They think that it was
just again covering up

for this very publicly
affiliated guy with Al

Mousarou who's a British
Intelligence plant.

[Fox] Our CIA says; "OK, let's arrest
him", but the British say NO again?

[John Loftus] The Brits say no.

Now at this point, 2 weeks
ago, the British know

that the CIA wants to get
a hold of (Aswat) Haroon,

so, what happens? He takes off again.

He goes right to London,
he isn't arrested when

he lands, he isn't arrested when he leaves.

[Fox] Even though he was on a watch list.
[John Loftus] He's on a watch list!

The only reason he could
get away with that, was

if he was working for British Intelligence.

He was a wanted man.

[Fox] And then it takes off the day before
the bombings, this is how I understand it.

[John Loftus] ...and goes to Pakistan, and
Pakistan arrested him. [Fox] They jail him.

[John Loftus] They jailed him:
He's released within 24 hours.

In London we spoke with David
Shayler a former MI5 agent

who was convicted of breaking the Official
Secrets Act, and imprisoned for 6 months.

With regard to 7/7, there
has been a witness report,

now included in a local British newspaper
called the Cambridge Evening News,

in which somebody who was
on one of the tube trains

says that he didn't see
a man with a rucksack,

in fact after the explosion
what he saw was metal

pointing upward from the
bottom of the carriage,

that would indicate of course that the
bomb was not carried on to the tube train,

but was in fact attached underneath it.

Now, again, nobody in the British
national press is following that up,

I hope investigators from the police are.

A current member of British Parliament
and a former cabinet minister,

in prime minister Tony Blair's government,

Michael Meacher was sacked in 2003

for raising important questions
on the eve of the Iraq war.

[Michael] Atrocity of London
bombings where 56 people

were killed, that was on the
7 of July, 7/7 we call it,

it's a very convenient way of ensuring there
is fear, of ensuring there is control,

and of ensuring that those
who are in the know,

and of course we cannot tell you
because it is all secret,

are in a position of extreme power.

As part of our inquiry
into the London bombings,

we wanted to investigate the suspicious
death of Jean Charles De Menezes.

Within days of his brutal
murder at the Stockwell

tube Station in the London underground,

evidence of a cover up began to emerge.

[Alex] What did you witness with
the unfortunate Brazilian man who died?

[Witness] We, all we saw it was the police
running into the station with guns.

That was all we saw.

We didn't see anything else at all, and then,
after that, a couple of seconds after that

we were vacating down
south (unintelligible).

That was all we saw.

We didn't see anything else.

[Alex] Are you sad for him
and his family that is dead?

[Witness] Oh yes! But at
the end of the day he

should have stopped and
surrendered, shouldn't he?

If it had happened in his own country
he would have been shot down as well.

With all that's going on,
the police were only doing

what they thought was best,
as far as I'm concerned.

[Alex] Why do you think that he ran?

[Witness] Well, because his
visa had run out, obviously.

He must have thought the
police running after

him just 'cause his visa
had run out, I'd say.

The police were protecting, you know,
the people who travel on the tube,

so I don't see any wrong in what
the police has done at all.

[Alex] No, I understand your view on that.
Why did they shoot 3 times in the head?

[Witness] I don't know. It's
a lot of times to shoot him.

It's a lot of times to shoot him.

[Alex] How many times the
shooters have shot him?

[Witness] Five at first.

5, and then, no, 3, first, then 5,
and then it went up to 8.

[Alex] The police admit they
tackled him and then shot him.

[Witness] Well they told him to surrender,
didn't they, they told him to stop.

And he didn't, he carried
on running, so, you know.

What else could they have done,
as far as I'm concerned.

[Alex] 007, uhh? [Witness] 007.
[Alex] License to kill...

[Witness] Yeah. I still
believe there should be a

shoot to kill policy. I
still believe personally.

But that's my views, you know.

I think people should give up
their liberties for freedom.

[Alex] All right...

London police were later forced to admit
that Mr. De Menezes never run from them,

wasn't wearing an heavy coat

and that a special army
unit had killed him,

execution style, with over
ten shots to the head,

at point blank range.

The British government was so desperate to
keep the details of the shooting secret

that they went so far as to arrest
an ITN television journalist

who had simply gotten a copy of what
normally be a public police report.

Government whistle blowers
and police have also

been suspended and arrested
for telling the truth.

We had our details taken and
we were threatened with arrest

simply for asking questions
of locals outside

the Stockwell station
and videotaping police.

[Policeman] Where were you raised?
[Alex] Austin, Texas.

[Policeman] Alex, what's your date of birth?
[Alex] 2/11/1974.

[Alex] Would you rather see my license?
[Policeman] No, thank you.

[Alex] Here it is. [Policeman] Just that
you're filming for a program in the USA?

[Alex] Exactly! I think
they're probably broken and...

[Alex] So what do you
think about this event?

[1st man] I think it's very
bad this has happened.

[Alex] What do you think should happen?

[1st man] I think the policy of shooting
should have been more thoroughly thought out.

[1st man] I'm afraid there must
have been a terrible mistake here.

[woman] I feel very sorry for
the family and very sorry

for the policemen that made
that horrible mistake.

[Alex] Yeah. It's gonna
be bad for everybody.

[woman] It's a tragedy all around, I think.
[Alex] Thank you.

The police first claimed
that it was a hot morning,

but official weather
report showed that it was

around 16 degrees and
that Mr. De Menezes was

"running down the street wearing a giant
padded coat with wires sticking out of it.

Then he vaulted over the turn styles,
charged through a crowd of pedestrians,

raced on to the train,

and was about to detonate bombs when
the heroic officer gunned him down."

The authorities then
conveniently claimed that all

the surveillance cameras
malfunctioned that morning.

Police have now been forced to admit,
thanks to watchdogs in their ranks,

that none of the cameras malfunctioned,
and they have now released a video.

The government has now
been forced to admit

that he was wearing a light denim jacket
and there were no wires of any type.

Police that weren't part of the special

military unit didn't know
why they killed him.

The police had followed him from his home,

they knew that he was a Latin-Brazilian
working in England as an electrician.

They followed him for 30 minutes as he
walked from his home towards the station.

Once in the station he
calmly bought a metro paper,

paid for his ticket with
his metro Oyster card,

and then walked onto the train.

Passengers then reported that they
were told to get off the train.

Once they stepped off, still
looking through the windows,

they saw the special force's
police squat on Mr. De Menezes,

and shoot him over ten times in the head.

Witnesses said that De Menezes looked
at the authorities as if he knew them,

he was like a scared rabbit and he
was killed, execution style.

The question is why?

A special military hit team stalked him and

tracked him from his home
to the train station

and then killed him on cold
blood making sure he was dead.

It's well known that, if somebody has
a bomb, you don't shoot at him,

and you certainly don't get near them.

No, Mr. De Menezes had seen something
that he wasn't supposed to see,

he learnt a little too much
and he had to be eliminated.

We were at the station just
a week after he was killed

and many of the facts we have covered
were already of public knowledge,

but still some of the locals
made excuses for the police.

Within hours of the 7/7 bombings
Israeli army radio was reporting

that Benjamin Netanyahu, the former
prime minister of Israel,

had been warned not to leave
his hotel that morning

to attend the meeting less
than an 100 yards away

from one of the train
stations that was bombed.

The Associated Press ran the headline
"Netanyahu changed plans due to warning",

then the current prime
minister Ariel Sharon's office

instructed Israeli officials
not to get interviews

to the foreign media
concerning the warning.

Israel's foreign office
attempted to spin the story

saying that they have given a general
warning to the British that day.

Then several weeks later the head of
Mossad told a major German newspaper

that he indeed had issued
a warning to Benjamin

Netanyahu at 8:48am, 10 minutes
before the first blast.

Conveniently for authorities the bus
surveillance camera malfunctioned.

Something else happened that was
convenient for the establishment lie:

All 4 of the supposed bombers' identification
cards survived unscathed at all 4 events.

There was just one problem,
in one case, one of the

bombers ID's was founded
in 2 separate locations.

As the evidence mounts, it
is crystal clear (that)

only criminal elements of the
British Government could

stage the attacks and then
engage on a cover up.

The reason the Netanyahu
story is important

is it clearly shows that
other intelligence agencies

were aware of what was going
on in London that day,

and took necessary precautions
to protect their Minister of Finance.

In 1994 the Israeli Embassy
in London was bombed.

This is a time when I was
in the service, I've

joined the middle east
section shortly after that,

and I was actually astounded to read a
document written by a senior MI5 officer

who had seen the information
coming in about this attack,

and he said that he believed that the
Israelis had bombed they're own embassy.

In any staged terror attack governments
have to be extremely careful

to keep the operation
shielded, compartmentalized.

Most people in government
are moral individuals

who believe that their are
standing up for their

nation's sovereignty or
its national interest,

and it is absolutely essential
to keep them in the dark.

One of chief tools used by
governments as a smoke screen

is staging exercises or
drills at the exact same

time, and exact same places as real events.

When the Oklahoma City
federal building was bombed,

the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms

was staging an anti-terror
drill with their bomb squad

on the morning of April 19th 1995, at
the same time the real event took place.

On the morning of September 11, 2001 the
Pentagon was running 5 separate drills,

two of the drills targeting the exact
same targets at the exact same time,

that caused NORAD to stand down,
believing it was just a drill.

And London was no different.

It's important to know that
those taking part in the drills

need not know they are part
of a larger operation,

in fact it's better for the conspirators
that they not be informed.

One of the chief reasons this is done,

is so that if any of the operatives
carrying out the attack are caught

by other elements of the government,

they can simply claim that they were
taking part in a drill or an exercise.

NSA, Infopol9, and Echelon type systems
that are scanning for terrorists chatter

would be fooled into believing they've
simply picked up part of an exercise.

On the morning of 7/7 in London
there was a simultaneous exercise

partying??? the exact same
trains, the exact same bus

at the exact same locations
at the very same time.

What we are supposed to believe
is some kind of coincidence,

that there was also an anti-terrorist drill
going on on 7/7, and again just like 9/11,

they were talking about attacks
on the same targets,

the same tube stations, at exactly the
same time as the actual attacks happened.

We learned of the drills of
7/7 on 7/7 from Peter Power,

the head of VISOR CONSULTANTS, a crisis
management firm based in London.

Mr. Power was the former spokes
person for Scotland Yard.

Mr. Power told national British
television ITN News about the drills

[Mr. Power] Today we were
running an exercise for

a company (unintelligible)
in the private sector

and we sat everybody down
in the city, 1000 people

involved in the whole
organization, but the crisis team

and the most peculiar things
was, we based our scenario

on simultaneous attacks on the London
Underground and the mainland station.

So we had to suddenly switch
one exercise from fictional to real,

and one of the first things
is get that bureau number,

when you have a list of people missing,
tell them. And it took a long time.

[ITN] Just to get this right you
were actually working today

on an exercise that envision
virtually this scenario?

[Mr. Power] Almost precisely.

I was on until 2 o'clock this morning,
because its our job, my own company,

VISOR CONSULTANTS, we specialize in helping

people to get their crisis
management response:

How do you jump from slow time
thinking to quick time doing,

and we chose a scenario,
with their assistance,

which is based on a terrorist attack

because they're quite close to a property

occupied by Jewish
businessmen here in the city

and there are more American banks in the city
than there are in the whole of New York,

a logical thing to do.

[ITN] So how extraordinary today must
feel for you as it unfolds.

[Alex] He repeated himself
to BBC radio five:

[Mr.Power] The thing that
concerns me, is what

we will be doing for the
1000s of men and women

actually who are in London
working, and I'm saying that

because at 9:30 this morning we
were actually running an exercise

for a company of a 1000 people in London,

based on simultaneous bombs
going off precisely at

the railways stations, it
happened this morning,

so I still have the hairs on the back
of my neck standing upright.

[BBC5] Let me get this quite straight.
You were running

an exercise to see how
would you cope with this,

and it happened while you
were running the exercise?

[Mr.Power] Precisely. It was about 9:30
this morning, we planned this for a company

for obvious reasons I don't reveal their
name, but the listeners will know it,

and we had a room for the crisis
managers, the first time we met,

and so within 5 minutes we had to put
a rapid decision. This is the real one,

and so we went to the correct drills of
activating crisis management procedures

to jump from slow time to quick
time thinking and so on.

[Alex] If we use a standard actuary
employed by major insurance companies,

to calculate the probability of these
events coinciding in a 10 years mean,

we learn that the probability of this
happening is greater than 1.3 protagillions,

to put that in perspective that's
a number with 41 zeros behind it.

That is trillions of trillions
and trillions and trillions

and still more trillions times greater than
all the grains of sand in all the world.

To put that number in
perspective it has 41 zeros.

Scientists using super
computers have estimated that

the earth has over 7
quatillions grains of sand.

A quatillion has 18 zeros.

It would appear in some way that stopping
the response of the emergency services

or providing some kind of
cover for what must be

operations orchestrated
in some way by the state.

The evidence is overwhelming,
all the tell-tale

signs are there, of
government sponsored terror.

Only the British government
had the know-how

to carry out the attacks and to control the
situation before and after the bombings,

and of course there are all the other
admitted cases where the British government

has hired terrorists to
carry out assassinations

or carried out bombings
in their own country

as a pretext for political control.

And then of course there is "cui bono", Latin
for "who benefits", who stands to gain.

In the weeks leading up the 7/7
Tony Blair's poll numbers

had fallen to the lowest points
in his 7 years administration.

His Labour Party was sure to loose
their parliamentary elections.

Support for the war was dismal.

Despite the bombings, which did improve his
approval ratings and support for the war,

he was still only barely able to maintain
control over the British House of Commons.

In the wake of the bombings Tony Blair's

administration descended
on the British people

with the raft of tyrannical legislations,
attacking the press, freedom of assembly,

and setting up the conditions
needed for a Martial Law

take over the nation through
the Civil Contingency Act.

And of course the bombings took place while
world leaders where meeting in Scotland

so Bush and Blair could
grandstand and blame the

whole thing on Iraq,
legitimizing their war.

Despite the fact that the G8 World Summit
was coming to England on July 7th,

the British government lowered the terror

threat on the London
underground in early June,

and conveniently lowered security.

We were told that we invaded Iraq
to bring the nation freedom

but Pentagon documents
show their real point was

to Balkanize the nation
into 3 or 4 sections

and foment endless civil
sectarian civil war.

The true objective was to ensure the nation

remained in turmoil as a
pretext to build permanent

military bases as well as delivering long
term profits to the defense contractors.

Think about it.

The defense contractors make more money
if they were just in Iraq a year

or now the projected decade?

United States, British and
Israeli forces have all

being caught repeatedly
carrying out staged terror

attacks in Iraq in an attempt
to keep the war going.

In the interest of time we
will look at just one example:

In late September of 2005 in the
British controlled city of Basra,

two British especial forces SAS commandos

attacked a group of police at a checkpoint,
killing 1 and injuring another

and when they were finally
subdued and brought into

custody, their car was filled
with plastic explosives,

automatic weapons, RPG grenades
and other bomb making materials.

Why would members of Britain's most elite

fighting force, the SAS,
be dressed like arabs

out shooting police with a car
full of plastic explosives,

in a city that have been
racked by sectarian violence?

The government of Basra in Iraq,

ordered that the British soldiers be held
for trial for the murder they've committed.

Within hours of theirs incarceration, dozens
of British tanks and hundreds of soldiers

assaulted the main
Police Station in Basra,

killing jail guards and police in
the process, to free the 2 commandos.

Over a hundred and fifty
prisoners escaped,

and the controlled mainstream media reported
on the internet as if it was no big deal.

We cannot wait for the final proof,

the smoking gun that could come
in the form of a mushroom cloud.

United States knows that Iraq has
weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam Hussein already
posses 2 out of the 3

key components needed to
build a nuclear bomb.

In early February of 2006 members of
British government leaked documents

that the White House admits are authentic.

Known as the White House Memo it is the
minutes of a pre-war meeting between

Prime Minister Blair and George
Bush in the Oval office.

The minutes contains the discussion
of a classic false flag operation,

where Bush tried to lure Saddam
into war, using UN aircraft.

Mr. Bush told Tony Blair of the extraordinary
plan during a meeting at the Whitehouse

on January 31st 2003, 6 weeks
before the war started.

'THE TIMES' of London reported.

'THE TIMES' reads: President Bush had
plans to lure Saddam Hussein into war

by flying an aircraft over Iraq painted in UN
colours in the hope he would shoot it down.

The memo also contains details of president
Bush's plan to have defectors claim

that they had seen weapons of mass
destruction that didn't exist.

Well it's perfectly true
that we now know that the

evidence, both in United
States and in Britain,

which was put before the people, turns out
to be wrong, it was known to be wrong,

it was fed to Parliament
and it was a fed to

Congress in order to get
the necessary support.

But we don't want the smoking gun
to be a mushroom cloud.

When the Congress threatened to block
the re-authorization and expansion

of the USA Patriot Act in 2006,

President Bush announced that he would still
enforce the law even if it was not a law.

That, by its definition, is dictatorship.

When president Bush was
caught secretly paying off

reporters and newspapers
and TV stations across the country

to the tune of 1.6 billion
dollars in 2 years,

the governmental accounting
office declared it

illegal, every single action
by itself was a felony,

and there were tens of
thousands of instances,

Bush simply said that he was above the law

and it didn't matter if
congress said it was

illegal, he was going to
continue the practice.

When a leader declares himself above the law
you're living in an official dictatorship.

We found out from our time in the services
that there are certain people in the press

who work as agents of influence
of the intelligence services.

In Britain is very easy to reward people with
privileges, with contracts, with honors,

with appointments to the House of Lords,
with knighthoods and so on.

So no money has to change hands,
but those people know very clearly

that they have the job to put out
propaganda on behalf of the services.

I have no problem of course with the
services hiring occasionally the media,

but if they gonna do
that, like anybody else,

they should declare where they come from and
why they are stating that point of view.

Fortunately as the result of that book:
"Spies, Lies and Whistle blowers"

one of the prominent agents of influence,

in fact two prominent agents of influence:
Dominic North and Cornt Cockley,

who both worked for the Sunday
Telegraph, have had to resign.

Because, of course, once you are
exposed as an agent of influence,

you can no longer do that job
because people just simply say (that)

what he is saying now (is) because
he is working to an MI6 brief.

When Congress informed
Bush that secret arrest,

secret detention and torture was illegal,

he simply had his Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales issuing a policy paper

claiming that it was lawful.

Known as the infamous
torture memo, Gonzales said

that they were simply
stop calling it torture,

and call it pressure and if someone died in
custody from torture that was acceptable.

But Whitehouse Consul, John Yoo, went even

further in memos that he
wrote for the president

that were used by the military
as their authority to engage in torture.

He stated that they can even
torture small children

in front of their parents,
in some cases sexually.

And in another shocking turn President Bush
is taken to signing pieces of legislation

that haven't even passed the Congress.

President Bush was also caught
engaging in warrantless searches

using the National Security Agency
to spy on the American people.

Bush claims the he had the Executive Authority
to ignore any federal law he wished.

The 1878 Posse Comintatus
law bars the military

from engaging a long enforcement
activities against the American people.

Bush was caught using the
Defense Intelligence

Agency, a branch of the Pentagon,

to spy on peaceful antiwar activists. He
again claimed that he was above the law.

Bush then claimed that the Constitution gave
him the right to spy on the american people.

Of course the Constitutional Bill Of
Rights, says the exact opposite.

In the mist of the scandal, the retiring
head of the National Security Agency

went before the National Press Club,

and informed everyone that there
was no need of a warrant in America.

He chastised a reporter who claimed you
needed a 'probable cause' to search someone.

He said all that was needed
was that it be quoted 'reasonable',

and the government would decide
what was 'reasonable'.

My understanding is that the 4th
Amendment of the Constitution

specifies that you must
have 'probable cause'

to be able to do a search
that does not violate an

American's right against
unlawful searches and seizures.

The 4th Amendment actually protects all of
us against unreasonable search and seizure.

But the measure is 'probable
cause', I believe.

The Amendment says unreasonable
search and seizure.

But does it not said probable...

No, the Amendment says
"unreasonable search and seizure".

The legal standard is
'probable cause', General.

You used the terms, just a few minutes
ago, 'we reasonable believe'.

A FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act de 1978) Court, my understanding is,

would not give you a warrant, if you went
before them and say 'we reasonably believe'.

You have to go to the FISA Court, the
Attorney General has to go to the FISA Court

and say: "we have probable cause".

And so what many people believe,
and I would like you to respond to this

is that what you actually done

is crafted a detour around the FISA Court

by creating a new standard
of 'reasonably believe',

oh.. in place of 'probable cause',

because the FISA Court would not give you
a warrant based on "reasonable belief",

you have to show a 'probable cause'.

Could you respond to that please?

Sure. I didn't craft the authorization,
I'm responding to a lawful order,

right, the Attorney General has
a word to the lawfulness of the order.

I would now read the 4th
Amendment in its entirety:

The right of the people to be secure in
their persons, houses, papers and effects,

against unreasonable searches
and seizures, shall not be violated,

and no warrants shall be issued,
but upon probable cause,

supported by oath or affirmation, and

particularly describing
the place to be searched,

and the persons or things to be seized.

Notice that the 4th Amendment
clearly states: no

Warrants shall be issued,
but upon probable cause

and that must be supported
by an oath or affirmation,

and particularly describing the place to be

searched, and the persons
or things to be seized.

That is the definition of
reasonable, reasonable

is having a witness and
having probable cause

and specifically knowing what has been
done, that is wrong and against the law,

that you're searching for,

not just "oh.. we say
we're being reasonable"

The National Security Agency Director
clearly knew what he was doing.

He knows that 99% percent
of the Americans have

no idea what the 4th
Amendment actually says,

so he claims that it's OK for them
to spy on us without a warrant,

counting on us being ignorant.
That ignorance needs to end.

Or, maybe, he's looking at a 4th Amendment
that the rest of us haven't seen.

Several years into the
occupation of Iraq, President

Bush told the world that they had freedom,

freedom of the press.

Now it's been revealed
that if you write one

story critical of the
occupational government

you're instantly arrested and sentenced
on average to 30 years in prison.

In some cases reporters were
simply executed or tortured,

then it came up that the
Pentagon was covertly

controlling almost every
major newspaper in Iraq,

and the PR firms were writing most of
the stories in the United States.

But it's not just going in
Iraq, billions and billions

of dollars a year are spent
paying off reporters

planting fake news stories
and producing fake newscasts,

the military calls this INFOWARS,
seizing the mind of the enemy,

and they're treating the
American people like an enemy.

When you learn that the Pentagon
the CIA and the White House

are openly engaging in military style
propaganda against the American people,

then you begin to realize why large
portions of the American population

simply don't have their facts straight.

We asked David Shayler about MI5
and MI6 connections to Al Qaeda:

I've learnt of an operation in which MI6,
the British External Intelligence Service,

had funded Al Qaeda to
carry out an operation

to try to assassinate
colonel Gaddafi of Libya.

Once I have become briefed
on a plot in which MI6 was

funding a terrorist enemy
without government permission,

I no longer would be part of that set up.

We also spoke with former
MI5 agent Annie Machon,

herself, a whistle-blower,
exposing MI5 and MI6 wrong doing:

I went public in conjunction
with my partner because

we've seen so many dreadful things going on

and we believed that the British
public deserves better protection.

My own... not as much
government, but intelligence

services were carrying out an operation

in which innocent Libyans died.

David was briefed officially
by MI6 officers on

their attempt to assassinate
Colonel Gaddafi,

by funding Al Qaeda in Libya.

So I thought I needed to
say something about that,

it took a long time to have the
courage to be able to do that

with the newspapers in this country,

but eventually I decided that
was the only way forward.

Ohm..We had to leave ours
friends and families,

we had to leave our job our home
everything in London with 3 days notice,

because the newspapers suddenly
decided to kick into action.

I lived in exile for 3 years, in fact,
when I actually tried to use a legal route

to alert the British government
about MI6 funding Al Qaeda,

I was the one thrown in prison.

We then tried to negotiate with
the government, we tried to say:

"Please, take our evidence about
the crimes we have seen",

the government refused then,
until this day 8 years on

they're still refusing to
take David's evidence and my

evidence about crimes committed
by our intelligence agencies.

We have sources that told
the press, a source in

America, from the State
Department and the CIA

who confirm the payments
were made to a group in

Libya that was associated
with Osama Bin Laden,

a document actually
appeared on the internet,

which pre-dates the attack
and describes exactly the

Modus Operandi they were
carrying out the attack,

the time of the attack, the people
involved, the Islamic Extremists and so on

that I've described, when
I went on the record.

As a result of the attacks on 7/7, the
British people seem much more complacent

and will allow the state to
infringe their liberties in

a way that they wouldn't
allow them to do otherwise.

While in London, I've learnt the
Parliament had just passed the law

that would ban any type of
free speech within several

miles around the British
Parliament building.

Blair's approval ratings go
up when there's an event.

Bush's approval ratings go
up when there's an event.

What 'Muslim extremists'
in their right mind

would carry out an operation that would
empower the New World Order global empire

whose epicentre is London
and New York and DC?

Why would anybody put up with this?

My friend never give up your liberties,
stand up against tyranny, learn the truth

and find out who has the motif
to scare you into submission,

to intimidate you, to
fooling you into accepting

their global wars and empire and genocide.

At a time like this I
think people are prepared

to give up a little bit
on liberties, just a bit.

I mean, Yes, Al Qaeda,
if there's nothing to

hide, there is not really
a problem, isn't it?

I think we should be just a bit further
on what we have allowed here.

I think if we've been too
democratic, we've been too soft.

What is done to people who wish to
demonstrate is increasingly worrying.

A lot of demonstrations,
Geneva, the G8, Glenn

Eagles and many other
places around the world,

there's no wish of those who
demonstrate, in my view, for violence,

they disagree profoundly with what
their governments are doing,

I'm not saying whether
they are right or wrong,

I'm simply saying that they should
have the right to do so,

without harassment,
intimidation or, indeed, being

charged, attacked and
being seriously injured.

[Brian] Is they the only ones who gonna
be allowed to have the big loud speakers

out in the public areas?

It's just like in China
are gonna be the States.

I'm not saying one of the things
that does concern me is Brian Haw,

who camped outside Parliament
in the square which

actually faces the parliamentary buildings,

faces the large iron gates where ministers
come in and an MPs is going in and out,

he maybe ignored, he maybe laughed at, he
maybe mocked, but at least he's able to do it

and some people may listen and he may
have more effect than we realise.

Now we call that, we used
to call that, free speech.

[Brian] What about your freedom lady?
The Statue of Liberty...

[Alex] Oh, I did hear a rumor
that the Statue of Liberty has

been brought in for a questioning.
She may be with Al Qaeda.

[Brian] You're probably right.

[Brian] Six times they've
taken me to court, oh

no, we took them to court
this time, by the way.

We took Mr. Charles Clark,
the Home Secretary,

and Mr. Ian Blair the Commissioner of Police

Obviously, (we were the)
complainants, they were

the defendants, and it
was found in my favour.

It's very much of concern
that we've actually caught

an act of Parliament which
in one of its sections

is clearly designed to prevent
him or people like him,

putting across a message which
they feel passionately about,

and which could be heard within the confines
of Parliament. I find that very worrying.

I bull-horned Parliament 3 days before
the law went into effect.

George Bush carried out 9/11.
Do you think some people

in a cave, do you think
some people in the cave

were able to have NORAD stand down?

Do you think that people in a cave
were able to have all of this happen?

It's a total and complete fraud.

The New World Order is using
power to scare you into submission,

and they will be defeated and
here, in a supposed free

country, where they're trying
to pass a law to stop this,

they're here to talk to us.

I witnessed local activists
bull-horning Parliament and

the local police didn't
have a problem with that,

but as soon I got on the bull-horn, and
began talking about pertinent issues,

they became very upset and enrolled me
into some type of trouble-maker database.

You've got to understand that
governments stand to gain from terror,

to scare you into submission, to attack...

Dick Cheney in September of 2000,
openly wrote a document

called Rebuilding America's Defences,

and he said we needed a
Pearl Harbour event.

The US government wants to carry out terror
attacks to blame it on their enemies.

9/11 was a self-inflicted wound, 9/11
was an inside job, it was orchestrated,

it was engineered by the globalists.

A few weeks after returning to the United

States, I then read in
the newspapers in horror

that I had indeed been enrolled
in a terrorist database.

The ID cards, the compulsory
ID cards that have

been proposed for first
time in our history.

Around about 80% of the British people
oppose the introduction of these cards.

It's not just cards it's the
database that go behind them,

that allows the state to access
private information and so on

And yet as results of
7/7 it seems that these

things would be steam-rolled
through a parliament,

where if we look at the moments there
are assaults on civil liberties

as a result, of course, of
the so-called war on terror.

Similar guidelines have been
implemented inside the United States.

A Virginia anti-terror
training manual lists

property rights activist
as potential terrorist.

A Texas manual lists those wearing Levis

jeans, having cell phones,
and who are, quote,

"friendly towards the police"
as potential terrorists.

In Arizona they list those
who make frequent references

to the US Constitution,
as potential terrorists.

All of this guidelines
have been produced by the

federal government and
distributed at the state level.

The federal government itself has
told police to be on the look out

for drivers who have road
almanacs or driver atlases.

All across the planet, governments
are restricting Free Speech

and setting up so called
'free speech zones'

to stop their populations
from demonstrating.

Months later Paul and Steve Watson came to

Texas and joined me live
on my radio broadcast

to discuss the aftermath
of London bombings.

[Alex] We're joined in the studio by
Steve Watson and Paul Watson,

[Alex] Guys, you've been
in the United States

now for about 7 days,
how have you liked it?

[Steve] It's been pretty
good so far, obviously

it's all western cultures,
so it's pretty similar.

[Alex] When we were in London,
I mean there were so many facets to it,

what was it like to have the
police march up to you,

and tell you to turn your
camera off when you were

just on a public street
interviewing, people?

[Steve] Well, I mean, the
fear-mongering at the

time, we where there right
after the bombings,

3 weeks after the first
bombings, I believe,

but then there was the
second failed attempt,

so the state of panic
was still quite high,

even though Londoners, basically,
were apathetic to the attack,

they just got on with
their lives, they weren't

really buying the government
propaganda on it.

We had case after case, where we'd
be out in the street doing...

interviews with peoples and
we'd be showing the video cameras

and there were people working right
there at the Hard Rock Café,

and I'm like: "look at these cameras, there
are everywhere, there are in plain view!"

And the manager comes out
and goes: "you know,

thanks for showing that,
I've never noticed those."

[Alex] What's your name sir?
[Charlie] Charlie.

[Alex] I'm Alex. Nice to meet you, Charlie.
[Charlie] How are you doing? [Alex] Good.

[Alex] What do you think of the new
symbol of the United Kingdom,

is gonna switch from the Union Jack
to the black surveillance camera

[Charlie] Oh, yeah. There's plenty
(of things) going on around

and inside: they need the
surveillance cameras every ways.

[Alex] But, I mean, it's gonna
be the new national symbol.

Of course I'm being sarcastic, but really

it has become the national symbol,

4+ millions of surveillance cameras
in the great city of London alone.

[Charlie] Besides that, you know,
I hardly could see them here.

[Alex] If you don't see them
there, then they don't exist?

[Charlie] 4 Millions in the city?
That's the first I've even

noticed they're there, and
I've been working here a year

[Alex] Out of sight, out of mind, huh?

[Charlie] That's it, that's it.

[Alex] That's kind of Orwellian though.

[Alex] You seem like a
smart guy, because, you

know, only the smartest
people in the inner party

know how to engage in double
think and double speech

where you don't even notice
the cameras that are there,

in fact, if you say they aren't
there, THEY AREN'T THERE!

[Alex] Here, together, let's
say they don't exist.

[Charlie] Oh right... They don't exist.

[Alex] 2 plus 2 equals 5. Hey!

[Alex] Hey, you could get
an inner party membership.

[Charlie] All right, I'm into it.

[Alex] And, I mean, that
was actual double think.

[Alex] Steve, Paul, do you
want to comment on that?

[Paul] Well, let me read you that
quote from Orwell, from 1984

"Double think is an
unending series of victories

of your own memory's reality control.

To know and not to know, to
be conscious of complete

truthfulness, while telling
carefully constructed lies,

to hold simultaneously 2
opinions which cancelled

out, knowing them to be
completely contradictory,

and believing in both of them,

to use logic against logic, to repudiate
morality while laying claim to it.

This is exactly what we saw
over and over again in London.

[Steve] You've got a nest
of what, 6 or 7 cameras and

people are out there saying
they never noticed them.

It's like a survival
mechanism to deny reality,

but at the end of the day is not even a
survival mechanism: it's quite dangerous.

We were asking the
attitudes of taxi drivers

about the bombings they
were all quite ambiguous,

they cannot believe the
government lied at that point.

[Alex] Do you ever wonder
who is really behind it?

[Taxi driver] Oh, well,
I've heard, there is people

who think that it's other
governments behind it,

you know, British government,
American government, people say that.

[Alex] Oh really, you heard some people
think it's the government?

[Taxi driver] Yes, I've heard that.

[Alex] Really, how popular is that view?

[Taxi driver] Umh...
Pretty unpopular I would assert.

[Alex] It is straight out
of George Orwell 1984.

This poor women thinks that if you give up
your liberty you supposedly get freedom.

[Paul] Yes, when we went to Stockwell tube
station where they shot the Brazilian man,

we basically noticed this woman,
who was working on the fruit store,

she'd been interviewed
on the BBC, I had seen

her on there, so we went
over to interview her.

We were talking to her, Alex asked if
she would sacrifice liberty for security,

and she came back with:
"Yes, I'll sacrifice liberty for freedom".

[Witness] I think people should give up
their liberty for freedom.

[Paul] Liberty and freedom
are the same thing.

We then asked her again, to
clarify just in case she

made a mistake, and she
said the same thing again:

She was willing to give
up liberty for freedom.

Which is really direct double think, because
the two things mean the same thing.

[Alex] We found the same mind setting in
CRAWFORD, Texas, outside Bush's ranch

that we witnessed in England.

Populations who are willfully ignorant,
who revel in being lied to.

We are on our way out to CRAWFORD where
president Bush is vacationing for 5 weeks.

He's spent about a fourth
of his time in the administration,

out here at his hollywood set.

Though he admittedly is
afraid of horses, and the

cows, and many other forms of wildlife, and

of course he was born in
Kennybunkport (Maine),

he spent most of his life
there his life there,

he likes to put on a cowboy hat and
a big belt buckle and strut around.

He meets with all these world leaders and

decides to basically how
to carve up the world.

He meets with the Saudi leaders, holds hands
with them, he meets with Ariel Sharoon.

He meets with leaders
from all over the world,

but he certainly doesn't meet
with the mothers of dead soldiers.

[Cindy Sheehan] They don't
have any skin in the game,

so it's easy for them to say, you know,
let's keep our kids over there,

let's complete the mission even though
we don't even know what the mission is.

[Alex] That's going to be a theme,
we gotta get them before they get us.

[Alex] Do you think Iraq
attacked us on 9/11?

[man] Maybe not Iraq itself
but the belief in the cause

that those people have there.
Yeah, that's true.

[Alex] 15 of 19 hijackers
came from Saudi Arabia,

and Bush is out of his ranch holding
hands with the royal princes,

but then we gotta go into Iraq.

[Alex] No, but seriously,
sir, it's a serious issue.

[Alex] What do you think they are
coming for, sir? I mean, tell me.

[man] All of you are trying to make this
"we're in bed with Saudi Arabia bullshit,

and this is all a big
farce to get Saudi oil

and all that." This is
not what this is about.

[Alex] So our government is
not in bed with the Saudis?

[Alex] While in Crawford we ran into Ray
McGovern and spoke with him about Iraq.

Ray MacGovern is a retired
senior level CIA analyst

whose career spanned the
administrations of John F.

Kennedy to George H. W. Bush.

His duties included sharing
national intelligence estimates

and preparing the president daily briefs.

[Ray] I believe that they are still
interested in permanent military bases there,

I believe they are still interested in

controlling the oil from
that part of the world,

and so it will be: stay the course.

It will be 6,7,8 US troops
killed every day or every week.

And, what's below the surface here, was

revealed to me by a very
well heeled gentleman,

who come up to me after
a speech I made outside

of Milwaukee, in a very
affluent suburb. He said:

"Mr. McGovern, get real, I
mean, what's your problem?"

He said: "you don't have
any problem with...

...you don't deny that we
need the oil, do you?"

And I said no. He said: "Well, you know,
6,7,8,10 marines a week for the oil,

you have to admit that is a
very cheap price for the oil."

I said, you know, how I handle this?

Well the utilitarian argument
is probably the best,

"I object to it", said I,
"because we can't do it."

"There are 1.3 billion
Muslims in this world...

...they are not gonna let us do it!"
[Alex] It's already widening.

[Ray] The borders are
porous, we can't do it.

"Well that didn't convince me", he said,
"Well, I think we can do it!"

"Oh, suppose that your son was
one of those 6 kill in Iraq last week."

And you know what?

He looked to me like it had
never occurred to him,

and it wouldn't have occurred to him
because it wouldn't be his son,

it would be the sons from the farms,
it would be the sons from the city,

and so he said:
"Well I don't buy that either."

So, maybe I will try a
moral argument, on him.

I said: "Are you one of
those that like to have the

10 commandments poured into the school
houses, and in the courtrooms of this..."

"Oh, that's a great idea!"

I said: "Well, you know, if memory
serves, there's one that says:

'shall not covet your neighbor's oil',
I mean, goods."

[Alex] Don't bare false witnesses.

[Ray] "There's one that
says you shouldn't steal,

and there is also one
against killing a person,

so maybe you wanna subtract 4

and bring in the 6
commandments into the school

houses and the courtrooms in this country."

"Get real!", I said, "this
is a moral issue: you

shouldn't be going around
killing unarmed civilians,

and causing more violence
where violence is endemic."

[Alex] And what did he say?

[Ray] He turned on his
heels, marched out to his

SUV, preyed for cheap
gasoline and drove home.

[1st man] I want the oil! Let's educate them,
bring them in democracy and take their oil.

[2nd man] Apparently somebody who took too

much yellow acid and got
the help story wrong.

[3rd man] The majority of the construction
that I've seen as an ambassador,

I could say 90% of the
construction that I saw,

wasn't for the Iraqis, it was with the
American bases they were building

concrete structures, incredibly perfect,

designed to house 1000s of
soldiers for a long period of time.

[Ray] The American people are being
kept in the dark about all this.

If there weren't free shows like yours,
and for few others in the internet,

you wouldn't never have the
chance to learn the truth of this.

What Cindy Sheehan has done is...
...brought a human dimension to this.

She said: "Look, people are
getting killed, including

my son, a lot of Iraqis
are getting killed..."

"Why don't we face up to whether
this war makes any sense at all?"

"Do we really wanna have our
young people sacrificed for...

...for what?"

[4th man] We don't know.
We don't know what's going on.

To tell you the truth my
kids don't know the things

that are involved in the
decisions I make in my house,

and that doesn't mean that they
need to be involved in the decisions,

because I know better than they
know, because I'm more informed,

and I'll give him the same benefit.
You know, we did elect.

[beard man] Where have
we lost our freedom?

[Alex] All across them.
[5th man] Where?

There is an Homeless Security
against topless bars,

There is an Homeless Security
against toy store owners,

There is an Homeless Security
against pot dealers. And that's wrong!

There is an Homeless Security against
gang members. It's admitted.

Are you familiar with the Gulf
of Tonkin never happened?

Lindon B. Johnson tapes
and others relationed.

[beard man] No, sir.

[Cindy Sheehan] Well, you know,
I just got to point out that

Wolfowitz, Pearl, Feith, Abrahams,
Wormsurs???, you know people like that, who

this has been their plan.
It's about, you know,

it's about imperialism, it's
about abusing a nation's

national resources, it's
about greed and power,

and is nothing about keeping America safe, or
freedom and democracy for the Iraqi people.

[Michael Mecher] I believe
that America, right

from the start of the Bush administration,

has been fixed, has been focused on
the use of the American military power

in order to extend control, by America,
of strategic areas in the world.

[Ray] Now we have the
Downing Street's minute,

which shows that as early as July 23, 2002,

the head of British intelligence, just back
from Washington, said to his prime minister:

"It's a done deal: the decision
for war is inevitable,

the war will be justified
by the conjunction of

terrorism and weapons of mass destructions,

and intelligence, in facts, will
be fixed around the policy of war."

There's the proof that the intelligence, all
these justifications in quotes for the war,

was a fraud, a fraud from day one.

[Michael Meacher] The Project for a New
American Century, the think tank...

with the report called
'Strenghtening America's Defenses'

this is frankly a demand for full
spectrum dominance by the United States.

I think the most chilling aspects of the
Project for a New American Century document

is this kind of transformation
about foreign policy,

this kind of strenghtening
of America's defenses.

Is a revolutionary change and is not going
to come, not gonna happen at all quickly,

absent a new catalyst of massive proportion,
for example, a new Pearl Harbour.

[Alex] In Crawford, Texas we
found individuals who believe

that weapons of mass destruction
were found in Iraq.

[Alex] Ah, no weapons of
mass destruction were found.

[man hat] Are you kidding me?
Do you buy that? [Alex] Yes.

[man hat] Of course there
were mass, of course

there were, there were,
there were, there were.

[Alex] This guy would make a great citizen
in George Orwell's fictitious 1984.

[man hat] We took them all away, does that
still mean that, if he had the capability,

would he still? See, that's in the mind.

[blue cap] First, she's got
an ad on TV, it said: "if

he didn't lie my son wouldn't
have died, you know"

[Alex] But he did lie!
[blue cap] He lied about what?

[blue cap] What did George Bush lie about?

[Alex] He said he didn't go for
weapons of mass destruction?

[black cap] To drive the
enemies out of our backyards.

[black cap] He never said that nobody
would be killed, that's war!

[Alex] I think they're saying
that Bush lied about WMDs,

it's not about troops who were gonna die.

[black cap] But did he (lie) though?
But did he (lie) though?

[black cap] Don't ah... don't
ah.., those weapons were there!

[Michael Meacher] The
authoritarian powers of the state

which are available to
government is very dangerous,

and I think we live in a state, we
live in states, but the USA and the UK

where the powers to question, to call
in evidence, to demand explanation,

to hold to account those who are in control,
are gradually, systematically been weakened.

This is very dangerous in a democracy.

[Ray] Now Dick Cheney and John Bolton
and others have been saying Iran

poses an immediate danger they could
get a nuclear weapon, before we know it,

all the same things they said about Iraq,

and so we have to do
something about that, now!

[Cindy] You know, he said the
same thing about Iraq, like you

said, he was caught red handed,
it's been proven to be lies.

Why should we believe them about Iran?

[Ray] I'm pleased to tell
you, American people,

that the national intelligence estimate

just put out on Iran says that Iran cannot

possibly have a nuclear
weapon for 10 more years.

Let me say it one more
time: Iran can't be a

nuclear power, weapon
wise, for 10 more years.

[David] We have to look whether our
governments are creating enemies

so they can justify what they do,

of course two of the biggest
funders in American

presidential campaigns are the oil industry

and the arms industry, and its in their
interest that we invade places like Iraq.

[Ray] We gonna let the israelis or
we are gonna do it ourselves,

to attack nuclear facilities in Iran.

Now people say that's crazy.

That is absolutely crazy, I agree.

The problem is, folks, that people
running our policy toward Iraq and Iran,

were widely known in the 1980's when I was
briefing the Vice President and others,

as "The Crazies". You come in on Monday
morning, and somebody would say:

"Guess what the Crazies
did late Friday night?"

And you know who, exactly,
who the reference was.

It was to Wolfowitz, was to Pearl...
All the same folks...

some of whom who deserted the
sinking ship like proverbial rats, OK?

There was Feith, Wolfowitz
and the rest of them.

They were "The Crazies"!

[white cap] There's a lot
of other people that

have a dissenting opinion about this war.

And... has another view of this
war other than Cindy Sheehan's.

And other people lost sons
in this war, and daughters.

She should really go home. Do this
little protest some other way, besides

trying to make things sound like
she is the only voice of America.

[Alex] Three weeks later this gentleman
and many other got their wish.

Free speech was banned for 100s of squares
miles around Bush's Crawford ranch.

Now you can only protest on private
property or designated free speech zones,

where no one can even see your protest.

The tourists have popped up here now.
Let freedom win!

We decided to cap off our day in Crawford

by traveling down the
public highway, toward where

the Secret Service had
blocked off the public road,

two miles before the
entrance to Bush's ranch.

We were promptly told,
as if America was now a

3rd world police state,
to get out of there,

despite the fact that we
were credential press.

[Police] You need to get back
in your car and keep moving.

[Alex] Really? [Police] Yes.
You have to get off the road.

[Alex] Oh, off the road, Ok. Is
it all right to stand over here?

[Police] Past your cars, where you can stand.
[Alex] Oh, but the barricades are here.

[beard man] Let me get that straight:

Do you believe that the US government crashed
those airplanes on the World Trade Center?

[Alex] Yes, the evidence shows it. [beard
man] You full of shit! Take a hike!

[Michael Meacher] The
whole point about 9/11 is

that it gave a pretext
for a preconceived plan,

that plan is in the PNAC document, which
precedes 9/11 about almost a year.

[Ray] It's clear to us
that the administration

was using the corruption
of the intelligence

to justify a war that need not happen.

[David] In my opinion when you look at the
details in 9/11 and you read reports that

there were planes that supposedly contained
terrorists, but did not take off that day,

and that the flight 93,
for example, was supposed

to be aimed at the Capital
Hill or the White House,

you're in fact looking at a 'coup d'etat'

that they wanted to destroy the
infrastructure of American government.

[Ray] There are a host of unanswered
questions on all of this,

the reason why they are unanswered
is because this president,

this administration, will
not answer the questions.

[Michael Meacher] Why is it, that
perhaps the biggest question of all,

why is it that after on 9/11, 8:20am, when it
was undoubtedly, without any question, that

one of those planes hijacked between 8:20
and 9:38, when the Pentagon was hit,

(that is) an hour and 20 minutes, no US
airplane was put into the air?

[David] They were drills
on the day of 9/11,

in which the American defense forces are
supposed to be dealing with more hijackings,

obviously those would
slow down the response

of national defense to
the hijacked airliners.

If American passengers jet go off course and
they're tackled by American fighter jets,

the default position is to
shoot them down and yet

in this case, of course,
none of that happened.

[Michael Meacher] There was the Andrews
Air Force Base 10 miles from Washington,

it has a squadron of F16 fighters,
none of those was put into the air.

This is absolutely almost incredible:

The most powerful military
technological country

in the world, albeit under
a terrifying attack,

was not able to put planes into the air,

which actually could probably have
stopped at least the 2nd and 3rd hits.

[David] Another (question)
was why George Bush

sat there with a group of school children

for 16 minutes after he'd been alerted
to a plane going into the second tower.

[Ray] President is in
Sarasota (Florida), he's told

that the 2nd plane has hit
the World Trade Center

and the secret service guy immediately
says: "We're out of here!"

The president stays for 30
minutes, folks, for 30 minutes!

Now how do you explain that?

I've talked to all manner
of secret service people,

they say "We're out of here"
was exactly the right reaction.

Everyone knew where the President was,

if not the President you might have had
some concern with these little kids,

Why did he (Bush) stay for 30 minutes?
Why was

he (secrete service agent) countermanded?

[David] The indication, of course, is he
(Bush) knew exactly what was going on,

[Michael] I think all of
this needs to be explained.

It wasn't in the congressional board,

there was no serious examination of it,

and there is this amazing statement made
in the official congressional report

that the local authorities have not managed
to trace the source of the funding (of 9/11)

and then, the most amazingly
disingenuous statement,

(that) ultimately, is of
a little consequence.

It is of massive consequence!

The head of pakistani intelligence of
the ISI, Lieutenant Mahmoud Ahmad,

requested Omar Sheik,

who is a well known Islamic Extremist, who
is now actually in prison in Pakistan,

to wire a $100.000 to Mohamed
Atta who was the lead hijacker.

It is absolutely astonishing that,
that lead has never been followed up.

As it happened general Mahmoud
was actually on a visit to the US,

both before and just after 9/11, and so
(were) many leading government officials.

[Ray] For people to dismiss
this questioners as

conspiratorial advocates or
as conspiratorial theorists,

that's completely out of mind,
because the questions remain,

because the President who should be
able to answer them, will not.

[Michael Meacher] We have plenty of evidence
that the attack on Afghanistan was planned,

because after the negotiations with the
Talibans broke down in United States,

I think I went to Houston,
in Texas, in about July,

and there were later discussions
at about this time in Berlin,

where US officials made
absolutely clear to the

Taliban representatives
in this famous phrase:

"Either we would provide you
with a carpet of gold",

in other words, if you supply a
pipeline across Afghanistan,

you ensure the security
of the country you guard

that pipeline, then we
can do a deal with you,

"otherwise we'll bury you
in a carpet of bombs."

[Alex] In the years since 9/11,
scores of highly regarded individuals

have gone public to express their
serious doubts about 9/11.

These include former presidential
advisor and CIA analyst, Ray McGovern,

the father of Reaganomics
and former Assistance

Secretary of the US Treasury,
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts,

BYU physics professor Steven Jones,

former German Defense
Minister, Andreas Von Buelow,

former MI5 officer David Shayler,

former Blair cabinet
member, Michael Meacher,

former Chief Economist from
the Department of Labour,

during President George W.Bush's first term,
doctor Morgan Reynolds, and many more.

In early June of 2006, we traveled to Chicago
to meet with fellow 9/11 truth seekers

and expose the official story as a fraud.

You cannot hide the truth!
You will not hide the truth!

It's coming out! Your
crimes are coming out!

Ladies and gentlemen 9/11 was an inside job!
It's a self inflicted wound,

it's a government false
flag terror operations!

Research it! More people are
waking up every single day!

More people realize what the stakes are!

They love their families and they
understand that the government

is carrying out terrorist
attacks as a pretext

to re-engineer America
into a police state. Why!?

To capture us to be
their political slaves!

To use us as an engine of global
empire to invade the planet.

While in Chicago we had a chance to, again,
speak with former MI5 member, Annie Machon.

I'm convinced that 9/11 was an inside job.

The reasons, are enormous compelling
reasons why I think it was an inside job.

Primarily the collapse
of the twin towers which

looked to me to be controlled demolitions,

also the collapse of building
7 of the WTC complex,

also the fact that the air defenses
was stood down that day,

who benefited from the attacks, of course,

and there are a lot of
put options, put on the

airlines that suffered
during these attacks.

So a whole range of different
evidence that adds

up to something very, very
suspicious about 9/11.

I feel passionately that we need to expose
the government involvement in 9/11,

because, if we don't, they will
keep doing this in future.

There will be another attack in order
to justify another unjustifiable war.

We also spoke with doctor Morgan Renolds.

[Morgan] No matter how much our inert public
wants to avoid this, it's eating away,

it's willful denial,
it's willful ignorance,

it's eating away at the
underbelly of America,

and we're not gonna solves our
problems by ignoring 9/11.

The biggest smoking gun,
then and now, is WTC7.

How can anyone watch it, without some kind
of a psy-op or verbiage accompanying it,

and not look at that and say: "Hey,
that building was just demolished!"

Just the way the Las Vegas Sands was,
or the Seattle Stadium, etc,

It's just, there's no way around that!
Here we are

in the so called broad
daylight, it's 5:20 p.m.,

and we've got cameras on it...

...and what other explanation
can there be for this

very conventional looking
collapse, under 7 seconds,

There just has crime, inside
job written all over it.

We need real convictions,
we need arrests, we need prosecutions.

We also had a chance to speak to Professor
Steven Jones, who is a Doctor of Physics,

concerning new bombshell evidence
that conclusively proves

that thermite was used to cut the main
pillars in the World Trade Center towers.

There is this molten metal,
molten material flowing

out of the south tower,
just before its collapse,

as large quantity of yellow hot metal, and
then I read about these pools of molten metal

underneath both towers
and building 7 after their collapses.

Now, that fits like a glove with a thermite
reaction which produces molten iron.

You also see in these videos
there's molten metal coming up,

you see this white ash,
this dust that comes off,

and that combination: yellow hot molten
metal and white ash floating away.

That's a signature
characteristic for thermite.

And then finally we've got some samples of
this metal, the previously molten metal.

Using advanced techniques like
proton induced x-ray emission,

and the electron micro probe
we find out what's in these samples.

We are finding iron, also sulfur,
potassium and manganese.

These are characteristic
of a variation of thermite

which is used to cut through
steel very rapidly:

It is called thermate.

It's like... sure, you can take a knife, you
take the butter out of the fridge and you...

cut through that butter.

Now, adding sulfur to the thermite, and also
potassium permanganate, these chemicals,

it's like heating up your knife
to a very high temperature.

Now slices right through the butter, even if
the butter is cold, it slices right through.

Same way here by adding sulfur,
and potassium permanganate to thermite,

it'll now slice through
structural steel very rapidly.

But the end products will
have sulfur, potassium,

manganese and iron, and that's what we see.

Thermite, had to be planted
into the building,

which, of course, implies
directly an inside job:

Someone had to have
access in the building.

The in mid-March of 2006, actor Charlie Sheen
went public on my syndicated radio show,

and simply called for a new independent

investigation, and questioned
the official story.

Sheen knew the establishment lapdogs
would attack his personal past,

whether real or manufactured,
instead of challenging him on the facts.

So Charles Sheen preemptively challenged
them to challenge him on the facts,

something they steadfastly refused to do.

Literally 100s of vicious hit pieces
were written in newspapers worldwide,

every old rumor was dredged
up and thrown at Sheen,

and a fresh raft of allegations
was launched at him.

The only national
television program that was

fair in its presentation
was SHOWBIZ TONIGHT,

with A.J. Hammer on CNN.

On 'Showbiz Tonight' Charlie Sheen
speaks out on a controversial theory

that the government covered up
what really happened on 9/11.

Taking over 4 commercial airliners
and hitting 75% of their targets,

that feels like a conspiracy theory!

Tonight we dig even deeper
the host of the radio show

on which Sheen leveled
his startly allegations.

Join us live right here
on 'Showbiz Tonight'

The radio host to interview Sheen is

Alex Jones of
the Genesis Communications Networks,

Alex Jones we are live from Austin, Texas,

to talk about Sheen's riveting comments.

Alex, as I've mentioned,
the response we got for

doing this story last night
was absolutely shocking,

so I wanted to know how it
actually all came about. How

did your interview with Charlie
Sheen actually happen?

Did you guys reach out to him?
Did he call you? What was the deal?

[Alex] Well, just to make
something clear, Mr. Sheen

has amazing courage to do what he's done.

He contacted me, he's been
watching my documentaries for years,

he is one of the most informed people I have
talked to in Hollywood on this subject.

Listen, for years Hollywood has been on fire
with people knowing the truth about 9/11,

and I was the first to
expose 9/11 on the day,

in facts two months before, I had intel that
elements of the military industrial complex

were going to carry out the attack,

I said that they'll use Bin
Laden, the known CIA asset as

their patsy to take the blame
for attacking the towers.

So Mr. Sheen is only exceptional
in that he has courage in going public,

courage that no one else in Hollywood had. I
mean, here is CNN pool from Anderson Cooper,

a year and a half ago, where they said:

Is the government covering up 9/11?
Could they be involved?

90%, when the pool closed, on
CNN, said this. So listen,

I have my own syndicated
show, I have done 4,000

radio interviews the last
4 and an half years,

almost no ones calls and
disagrees now. We have

the majority view and we
have the evidence and,

bottom line, there are declassified US

government documents, like
Operation Northwoods,

that ABC news reported on back in 2000.

Operation Northwoods,
google it, and in there

the US government, an element of it, said
we wanna hijack jets by remote control,

crash them and blame it on
the Soviet Union and Cuba.

Now, that was decades ago,
this is why we believe this, right?

Then you look at the official story,
the firefighters, the police,

100s of them saying that there were bombs in
the buildings: they were told to shut up.

You look at building 7, detonators are
going up, you can see the explosions.

[A.J.] And Alex, a lot of this was
what Charlie Sheen was covering,

I'm actually just curious did
he reach out to you, guys?

Is he the one who put on the call in to you?
And how he went upon your show?

[Alex] Sure, sure. He called me a few weeks
ago and said that he loves this country,

he has nothing to gain from this,

and, in fact, it is
dangerous for him to do it.

[A.J.] Sure. Sure.

He said: "I love this country and my kids
so much that I'm gonna do this, Alex."

And I said: "God bless you!", because
now it makes for other Hollywood people

who got major pull, who know
the truth, to start going public.

Look, its really simple,
let's understand this, OK?

9/11 was an inside job, was
a self inflicted wound,

and what Charlie Sheen is
doing is just amazing,

and he can only be
commended for it, and all

he's calling for is for
a real investigation.

I go further at INFOWARS.COM
and PRISONPLANET.COM,

We lay out how it happened, what took
place and it's not just Charlie Sheen.

I've interviewed, CNN has
interviewed some of this

people, the only network
that I've seen doing it,

you guys have interviewed, there have been
physics professors that have gone public,

there have been the heads of mining
colleges that have gone public,

George Bush Senior's top CIA advisor, who
briefed him and briefed Ronald Reagan,

one of the highest level guys at the CIA,

says our government is
clearly involved in carrying

out terror to blame it on foreign enemies.

Did you know on CIA.GOV they admitted that
they carried out terror attacks in 1953

to blame it on Mohamed Mossadeq
in Iran as a pretext to overthrow him.

[A.J.] All right Alex, all
good stuff, all stuff that

needs to be talk about,
but, the question is, why?

Why have so many of the major media outlet
not talked about these alternative theories,

that exist behind 9/11, why is that?

[Alex] Mark Twain said
that in the beginning the

patriot is a scarce man hated
and feared and scorned,

but in time when his cause
succeeds, the timid join

him because then it costs
nothing to be a patriot.

A lot of people don't have the
courage that you have A.J.,

a lot of people don't have the
courage of Charlie Sheen,

they don't have the courage of the German
Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow.

[A.J.] What do you think they're afraid
that's gonna happen to them?

[Alex] They're afraid of being beaten up
by the hordes of NEO CONS intimidators

who try to go up there with their gestapo,
nazi tactics to try to bludgeon everybody

with their blogs and radio shows to shut
up, but they've lost power because people

have learned they a bunch of liers. They
lied about the Weapon of Mass Destructions,

they lied about everything, and now
their credibility is totally blown.

The new White House memo just came
out where Bush was talking about

staging the shoot down of
Americas planes to blame

it on Saddam, that's
public, that's admitted.

We have been getting an
overwhelming response

to our "SHOWBIZ TONIGHT Questions of
the Day, Charlie Sheen speaks out".

Do you agree with his assumption that
there is a government cover up of 9/11?

Let's take a look at how the votes are so
far: 82% of you say YES and only 18% say NO.

[Charlie] I had a sense that
this thing was gonna get hot,

I didn't realize that, as you
say, it was gonna go 'supernova'.

And, if they continue to
attack me personally, it

only gives credence to our
side of the arguments.

People want the truth. They want
the truth and what's been offered to us

resembles nothing of the sort.

[Alex] He says: "Don't believe me
just, check out the facts,

go look at the evidence, don't
believe the attack dogs

just, it isn't about Alex Jones and
Charlie Shenn or A.J.Hammer,

it's about NORAD standing down,
it's about bombs in the buildings,

it's about Pentagon documents saying
they wanted to carry out these attacks

and blame it on foreign
enemies, this is all public.

That's why all these physicists,
and politicians, and

people, and congress women,
ideas are bullet proof.

And the New World Order better
stop carrying out terror attacks,

we caught them over 200 times in the last

hundred years, western
governments doing this,

Hitler does it, the British
do it, the Russians did it,

governments do this, and I'm not
saying the whole government,

very small criminal black op(eration), Black
World, it's what they are called, operators

are carrying this out, that's the facts!

Please, go investigate, ladies and
gentlemen, you'll discover the truth.

Look at America! It's turning into a police
state, putting cameras in school bathrooms.

Nothing can stop the truth
from coming out of 9/11,

and we are in danger of the New World
Order carrying out more terror attacks

to keep this war for empire.

[Alex] Charlie Sheen then
appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live.

Sheen again threw down the gauntlet

and challenged his detractors
to look at the facts

of building 7 and the 5
frames from the Pentagon.

He's known for movies like
Platoon, and Wall Street

and in addition to see him every week
on Two And A Half Men, opening tonight

you can see him in Scary Movie 4, please
welcome the indestructible Charlie Sheen.

[Jimmy] You are happy is almost Easter...
[Charlie] Back at you, thank you.

[Jimmy] You had some interesting
comments you were on

a radio show, you talked
about 9/11, and you have...

is it a theory or you just don't believe the
government account of what happened on 9/11?

[Charlie] I just had questions.
I had a lot of questions,

and the form I chose to voice those
questions is in the Alex Jones radio show,

just because he's a guy that I've been a
fan of and followed for a lot of years

And, you know, I got attacked,
and there were a lot

of hit pieces, the reaction
was pretty severe,

[Jimmy] People get very mad
when celebrities have opinions.

[Charlie] No, I understand,
I understand, he's

not qualified, he doesn't,
you know, he's just,

who the hell is he to have an opinion
about something so horrible?

And, you know, it was sad because
they didn't really take a look

at any of the stuff I was
asking them to look at,

and then the evidence... or any of the stuff
that generated those questions, you know,

and they said: "Oh, he is another tin foil
hat wearing Hollywood clown", you know.

It's like the only, you
know, I felt that the

only real validation I
needed was just being

a tax paying American
that loves my country.

[Jimmy] And it's something
you wonder about, and

you would like to know
more about, I assume.

[Charlie] Sure. Sure.
[Jimmy] And did you study the tapes?

[Charlie] I've done a lot
of research and it's not

just me, it's the people
that have come before me,

the experts, the engineers
and the physicists,

and the scientists, and the scholars

that raised a lot of this things.

And I took a look at their research
and said: yeah, it didn't add up,

a lot of it doesn't add up, and there
are these questions, you know,

there's two areas: there's building 7, and
there's the 5 frames from the Pentagon.

Don't listen to me, do
your own research, but I

think that, you know,
what happened to a time

in this country when we
were entitled, when we

had a Constitutional and
the God given right

to be curious about things that
didn't make sense. That's all it was.

[Jimmy] Because we have
a lot of capable shows

now, and they need stuff to be mad about,

so, you know, stuff like
this is like, oh boy,

we can yell about this for an entire week,

Of course with your dad
being the president (in

TV program) and all, it
puts a lot on the focus.

[Charlie] That's true, I
should have confirmed

with him, before I came on the show.

Within weeks of Charlie Sheen throwing
down the gauntlet on national television

the federal government
released 2 new videos,

almost identical to frames released
4 years before by the Pentagon.

[David] You could have asked questions
about why the Pentagon could be attacked,

this is basically the most
defended building in the world.

Go look at the stills that released in
the video footage of that day,

which claimed that a jetliner went
into the side of the Pentagon,

and yet appeared to show that some
kind of guided missile going in there.

[Alex] The establishment
press chortled with glee as

if the new footage conclusively
proved their claims.

[Fox] Tonight on the big story of the
Pentagon releasing the 1st video showing

American Airline flight 77 crashing
into the Pentagon on September 11.

Well, that's a question:
Does this proves once

and for all that is where
that airplane crashed?

Well, I would have thought that over
the years that was never a question,

but some folks had a
question about that. I think

that question is now once
and for all answered.

Since the first days of
9/11, the Establishment

Press has only focused on
the Pentagon controversy,

and not the 100s of other smoking guns and
serious questions that have been raised.

We have to ask ourselves why?

As if it was by design the new frames
only intensified the debate,

no passenger plane is evident
in the still frames.

They are more than happy
to endlessly focus on

the Pentagon, but they
won't touch building 7.

It's amazing. Amazing,
incredible, pick your word.

For the 3rd time today,
it is reminiscent of

those pictures we have
all seen too much on TV.

A building was deliberately destroyed by
well placed dynamite to knock it down.

We have the owner of the World Trade
Center complex admitting on tape

that he ordered the building
demolished on the afternoon of 9/11.

We must admit we have had
such terrible loss of life,

and the smartest thing to do is pull it.

They made that decision to pull it
and we watched the building collapse.

9/11 was just one salvo in an ongoing war
against the free peoples of the planet,

it's all part of their "Terrorstorm".

Pentagon war planners now publicly admit

that 90% of their babel plans
are psychological vs physical,

the information war has
taken the place of aircraft

carriers, fighter bombers
and Abrahams A1 tanks

and you the population of
the planet are the target.

Put simply modern warfare
is all about selling

the population to love its own enslavement.

The elite are waging war on the people.

Edward L. Bernaise is regarded by
many as the Father of Public Relations.

He was born in Vienna, Austria; Bernaise
was the nephew of Sigmund Freud.

Bernaise pioneered the use
of psychology and other

social sciences to design
public persuasion campaigns.

He published several scholarly works, still
used in universities worldwide today.

On page 71 of his book
'Propaganda' Bernaise wrote:

"If we understand the mechanisms
and motives of the groups mind,

is it not possible to control and
regiment the masses according to our will

without their knowing about it?"

Bernaise literally wrote a book on
modern propaganda. His clients included:

Procter & Gamble, CBS television, the United
Fruit Company, the American Tobacco Company,

General Electric, Dodge Motors,

and he also spearheaded the national campaign
to fluoridate the water supply of America,

through the fluoridationists
of the Public Health Service.

He was hired by multiple
presidents to engage in

propaganda campaigns against
the American people,

as well as the US Army.

Another quote from his book 'Propaganda':

"The conscious and
intelligent manipulation of

the organized habits and
opinions of the masses

is an important element
in democratic society.

Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of
society constitute an invisible government,

which is the true ruling
power of our government.

We are governed, our minds are molded,
our tastes formed, our ideas suggested,

largely by men we have never heard of."

Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels
publicly praised Bernaise on many occasions,

and stated that Bernaise
work was the blueprint

used by the Nazis to seize
control of the Reich.

Edward Bernaise advanced the
science of propaganda light years,

but more than 60 years after
his heyday, the science

of mind control is 1000s of
times more sophisticated,

than even Bernaise had envisioned.

Since the dawn of man, bullies have attempted
to dominate and control the tribe.

Human history has been one long
struggle of the independent free human

against organized crime syndicates
attempting to enslave them.

Brute force has been replaced
with intimidation and propaganda.

We are manipulated into
enslaving ourselves.

We are conned into believing that
the establishment is our loving keeper

and not our parasitic master.

The New World Order architects are
a group of predatory control freaks,

who have enslaved humanity and are
desperate to keep control of their cattle.

The elite is threatened by independent free
humans who control their own destinies,

they're threatened by intelligence,
by beauty, by honor, by family.

They seek to control and steer
the destiny of humanity,

in a direction that secure
their power monopoly forever.

They're sadistic, they're callous
they think nothing of human life,

only control and keeping that control.

The entire world is being engineered,
designed to be a prison planet,

a control grid over free humanity,
where no dissent is tolerated.

Once you realize the establishment
is laughing at you,

you can begin to research the
truth and start fighting back.

Once you understand their game plan,
it is very easy to defeat.

Knowing who your enemy is, is half the
battle, taking action is the other half.

You only have to free your mind and
defeating the globalists will be easy.

"In a world of universal
deceit, telling the

truth is revolutionary." George Orwell
1984