Original subtitles

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. [Alexander Solzhenitsyn]

Our leaders have told us that the war on terror may last a hundred years,

a new kind of war against a shadowy enemy that can never be defeated.

Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists.

Generation after generation will have to lay down

its liberty in an endless war for global empire.

It was a breath taking display of fire power.

...and the Pentagon says: "we ain't seen nothing yet."

The perfect specter to convince populations to

relinquish their liberty in the name of security.

There is no doubt out, that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.

There is no doubt, that he is amassing them to use

against our friends, against our allies, and against us.

And if he does not disarm, the USA will lead a

coalition and disarm him in the name of peace.

We've been told that we are facing a hundred year war,

that will last generation after generation.

In this film we will explore who pulls the strings and who benefits

from the darks spectacle of modern warfare.

We will answer the question: "Do the people know how they are controlled?"

Do they understand the systems of power that surround them,

the modern propaganda machine of public relations

that wash their brains and fill their minds full of ball games and mindless??? fluff?

Is the population beginning to realize, that governments throughout history

have used the spectre of fear

to drive their populations into acquiescing to total tyranny.

September 11, National ID Cards, Big Brother, the Iraq war,

7/7 bombings in London, the invasion of Iran,

how they are all interconnected?

In previous films we have focused predominantly on September 11

as the foundational event, the pretext for the current geopolitical structure.

The smartest thing to do it's pull it.

And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.

National polls showed, that most americans and westerners

believe the official story of 9/11 to be a fraud.

And a large part of that majority believe that 9/11 was an inside job,

but the establishment press continues to contest any alternative view concerning 9/11.

In this documentary we will first look at the historical events that are not contested,

events where the fact of government sponsored terror is not debated,

but in fact openly admitted to by western governments.

There are literally 100s of examples of

government sponsored terrorism in modern history

or what are known as false flags operations.

We're going to start by looking at just five past examples,

then we will look at several modern cases.

What is a false flag?

The encyclopedia definition reads: false flags operations are covert operations,

conducted by governments, corporations or by other organizations,

which are designed to appear as though they were carried out by other entities.

The name was derived from the military concept of flying false colors,

that is flying the flag of a country other than your own.

There are many variants of false flags operations,

but one of the most popular carried out by governments is to stage a terror attack

or horrible criminal incident and then blame it on your political enemies.

*1933 Hitler storms to power*

One of the best known cases of false flag operations

was carried out by the newly elected Adolf Hitler on February 27th 1933.

Nazi documents uncovered at the end of world war II,

as well as testimony during the Nuremberg trials,

reveal what many historians already suspected,

that Hermann Goering had set fire to the Reichstag, the german parliament building.

The nazi's then produced their patsy, Marinis Vanderlubbe, an extremely

mentally handicapped young man, who was found rolling around

an ally behind the Reichstag, naked.

Vanderlubbe was then taken before a nazi show trial,

found guilty and sentenced to death.

He was beheaded on January 10th 1934.

Using the crisis he had created to pass laws similar to USA Patriot Act,

Hitler became dictator and set his sight on the world.

By march on 1939, Hitler had already seized Checoslovaquia.

Having gained both Austria and Checoslovaquia,

Hitler desired to move east against Poland,

but he do not want to look like the aggressor:

Hitler needed an excuse for attacking Poland.

It was Heinrich Himmler who came up with the plan,

thus the operation was code named Operation Himler.

On the night of August 31, 1939 the Germans took an unknown prisoner

from one of the concentration camps, dressed him in a polish uniform,

took him to the town of Glewitz on the German-Polish border, and then shot him.

The staged scene with the dead prisoner dressed in a polish uniform,

was supposed to appear as a Polish attack against a German radio station.

German radio, newspapers and news readers were flooded with images

of what appeared to be a dead Polish soldier who have dared to attack the Reich.

Now Hitler had his excuse to invade Poland,

and the nightmare of World War II had begun.

*1953: Cia Coup in Iran: Operation Ajax*

In 1953 the central intelligence agency, working in tandem with the MI6,

overthrew the democratically elected leader of Iran Doctor Mohammed Mossadeq.

Mossadeq had been educated in the west, was pro America and has driven communism forces

out of the north of his country shortly after being elected in 1951.

Mossadeq then nationalized the oil fields and denied British Petroleum a monopoly.

The CIA's owns history department at CIA.GOV

details how US and British intelligence agents

carried out terror attacks and then subsequently blame it on Mossadeq.

In the late 1990's large sections of operation Ajax were declassified.

The Field Commander of operation Ajax was none other than the grandson

of president Theodore Roosevelt: Kermit Roosevelt.

Before his death in 2000, Roosevelt went public

to the media bragging about his patriotism

in carrying out terrors attacks in Iran and blaming it on the government.

The provocations included:

Propaganda, demonstrations, bribery, agents of influence and false flag operations.

They bombed the home of a prominent religious leader and blamed it on Mossadeq.

They attacked the mosques, machine gunned crowds and handed out thousands of handbills

claiming that Mossadeq had done it.

Handbills read: up with Mossadeq, up with communism, down with Allah.

Doctor Mohammed Mossadeq was incarcerated for the duration of his life.

He fared better than any of his ministers who were

executed just days after the successful coup,

for crimes that the MI6 and CIA had committed.

The CIA then formed the dreaded iranian secret police or SAVAK,

and a 25 years rain of terror and torture then commenced.

The operation was seen by western intelligence agencies as a huge success.

The CIA then successfully used the exact same technique in scores of countries

to overthrow elected governments and dictators alike.

*1943 - 1983: NATO's Stay Behind: Operation Gladio*

Operation Gladio was an umbrella name for literally 100s of bombings

carried out by western intelligence agencies and NATO in:

Italy, Western Europe, Middle East, Latin America and Asia.

From 1947 until 1981, Italian presidents had gone public admitting operation Gladio

targeted innocent civilians and was to be blamed on lefters and communists.

On November 22, 1990 the European Parliament

had a resolution condemning the activities of Operation Gladio.

The former Italian Intelligence Chief has come clean concerning Gladio's actions as well.

Many other countries have declassified documents concerning Gladio.

It is part of a public record, that our government and other western governments

targeted trains, buses, schools.

Several times operatives zerod in on school buses,

knowing that images of dead children will get the population hopping mad

and ready to relinquish their liberties.

A particularly bloody bombing, at the central station of Bolonia (ltaly)

on the morning of August 2, 1980, which killed 85 people and wounded more than 200,

caused some Italian officials to break their silence,

and begin to expose just a small part of this wicked operation.

*1964 The Tonkin pretext*

And now the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

In the summer of 1964, president Lyndon B. Johnson needed the pretext

to commit the American people to the already expanding covered war

in south-east Asia.

Three communist PT boats attacked an American

destroyer at the coast of Vietnam yesterday,

and today president Johnson's response was hard and tough.

"To any armed attack upon our forces we shall reply,

to any in South East Asia who ask our help in defending their freedom, we shall give it."

In November of 2001, the Lyndon B. Johnson presidential library and museum

released tapes of phone conversations with the president

and then defence secretary Robert MacNamara

where they openly discussed plans to use the staged Gulf of Tonkin incident

as a pretext to expand the war.

Then in late 2005 the National Security Agency

declassified its own official history of the Gulf of Tonkin,

and admitted that intelligence agency officers

have deliberately skewed the intelligence

and claimed that Vietnamese patrol boats had attacked US destroyers on August 4th 1964,

when, in reality, they had done nothing even while being fired on by US forces.

Congress then authorized the Gulf of Tonkin resolution.

The Tonkin lie paved the way for 58.000 american

deaths and over 1.5 millions dead Vietnamese.

On October 6, 1976 two time bombs made of C4

planted on the Douglas DC8 aircraft exploded,

killing all 73 people on board, in the most deadly active airline terrorism

on the western hemisphere until september 11, 2001.

The plane was carrying olympic athletes from three countries,

including gold medals winners from Cuba.

Declassified FBI and CIA documents show

that the convicted bombers of the flight

had been given US Visas just days before the attack

and they were in the employ of the US government.

This have been reported on in respectable publications for years,

but has now been confirmed by multiple declassifications.

Cuban plane bomber was CIA agent. Declassified US government documents show

that a man suspected of involvement in the bombing of a cuban passenger plane

worked for the CIA:

Luis Posada Carriles.

*1967: USS Liberty Attacked*

In the early 1960's the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff L.L.Limnitzer

concocted the plan for false flag operations

as a pretext to invade Cuba and for war with the Soviet Union.

In Operation Northwoods, they planned to hijack jets by remote control,

crash them, and blame the attack on Cuba.

There were many others terrorists attacks they planned

to carry out, that were contained within the document.

One scenario mentioned was the destruction of a US naval vessel,

that was to be blamed on a foreign power, as pretext for war with any enemy they picked.

President Lyndon B.Johnson went operational with Northwoods

on June 8, 1967 during the Six Days War.

During the Six Days War between Israel and the Arab nations,

the USS liberty was sent by Johnson to collect

electronic intelligence in the eastern Mediterranean

The clearly marked US intelligence ship was 14 miles

off the coast of Israel in International waters.

A short time after the air attack had been completed,

the 3 torpedo boats approached us from our starboard quarter at high speed,

and in an apparent torpedo launch attitude.

Israeli surveillance aircraft flew low over the ship

and clearly identified it as an American vessel.

At 2 p.m. that afternoon, the USS liberty was attacked by 3 Mirage III fighter bombers.

From the onset of the attack, the fighter bombers were jamming US signals,

not only were they jamming US signals specifically, they were also unmarked:

The only unmarked aircrafts in Israel's arsenal.

The fighter bombers strafed the ship with their cannons,

dropped conventional ammunitions and napalm on the ship

repeatedly from stem to stern.

After the Mirages had done their work the ship was hit by medium bombers,

they saw (unintelligible) carrying napalm and other ammunitions like White Phosphorus.

The USS Liberty was then attacked by 3 Israeli torpedo boats bearing israeli flags.

The torpedo gun boats opened fire with high calibre machine guns and launched torpedoes.

A single torpedo struck the ship, blowing a hole in both sides,

entering the ship and living a 30 foot exit hole when it exploded.

Then the torpedo boats began strafing life rafts

in the water: an international war crime.

While all of this was happening the oversized american flag flew clearly above the ship.

The attack on the Liberty went on for hour after hour after hour.

During the entire attack, the USS Liberty continually called the Sixth Fleet,

that was nearby, begging for air support or rescue.

Two aircraft carriers in the Med responded by launching fighter aircrafts.

Unbelievably they were recalled by the White House.

Rear Admiral Geiss, then commanding the carriers in the Sixth Fleet,

called Washington personally to confirm the recall order.

Secretary of Defense MacNamara came on the line,

and then president Johnson himself told Geiss:

"I want that goddamn ship going to the bottom, no help, recall the wings."

Imagine being admiral Geiss begging the president

to allow you to defend an American ship

that's under attack and being told by him that he wants the ship going to the bottom.

Despite the fact that the US carriers withdrew their help,

a Russian spy ship appeared and witnessed part of the attack.

After 3 hours into the attack the Israelis withdrew because there were witnesses,

allowing the damaged USS Liberty a limp to safety.

Forty years after the attack on the USS Liberty, we know exactly what happened.

I've interviewed former Chairman of the Joint Chieff Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer,

I've interviewed the admirals who were on the line who heard what president Johnson said,

I've even talked to the head JAG officer of the navy

who was ordered to falsify the reports and cover up what had really happened.

One of the Israeli pilots has gone public as well

saying that 3 times he refused over his radio to headquarters to attack the ship,

saying clearly that it was an American ship, in International waters and an ally.

He was ordered, under threat of court martial, to engage the ship.

In a nutshell this is what happened: President

Johnson had personal control over the ship,

parked it in the Mediterranean,

made a back-room deal with Israel to attack it, with an order to kill all aboard.

Then the attack on the ship was to be blamed on Egypt,

the US would enter the war and take over the entire Middle East.

In the aftermath of the attack on the most highly decorated ship in US history,

the captain and his entire crew were told they

would spend life on prison or would be killed

if they told anyone what happened.

Captain William L. McGonagle was given the Congressional Medal of Honor in secret

and told not to tell anyone that he had won the award.

Now that we've looked at a small cross section

of historical examples of government sponsored terrorism,

let fast forward to the horrific attacks on 7/7 in London.

Prime Minister Tony Blair, leader of the Labour Party

was facing an up hill battle in parliamentary elections.

National polls showed that his pro-war party was sure to lose

and then right on time the bombings of 7/7 and 7/21 occurred.

Within days of the London Bombings,

evidence began to emerge indicating western intelligence agency involvement.

I've traveled to London from Austin, Texas, to personally investigate.

Once I've arrived, I was met by Paul Joseph Watson and his brother Steve Watson

who are reporters of my news website: www.prisonplanet.com.

To understand the London bombings and who perpetrated it,

you first need to look at 3/11, 2004:

The Bombings in Madrid, Spain.

Years after the blast that rocked trains in the city of Madrid, Spain,

the government admits that Al Qaeda had no connection with the attacks.

Everyone of the supposed bombers

had intimate links with the Spanish security

services, including the head of their bomb squad.

The alleged leader of the bombers, who reportedly gave dynamite to the terrorists

was connected with the Madrid bomb squad

and we see the exact same earmarks, the same MO (Modus Operandi) in the London bombings

that we witnessed in Madrid.

On the morning of July 7, 2005, three trains and a city bus

were ripped to pieces when 4 military grade explosive devices detonated.

At 8.50am, three explosive devices

simultaneously detonated on 3 separated trains.

Within minutes eyes witnesses were reporting to the

press that there had been multiple terror attacks,

despite the fact that 3 train cars were burning

wrecks strewn with dead and dying Londoners,

Scotland Yard for over an hour an a half claimed

that all of the disruption was simply caused

by a power outage in the London Underground.

Power surge in the Underground. That's what we heard.

I mean the bus was about an hour after the Underground so...

that sort of thing that everybody knew it wasn't what it was, you know,

I mean it was just an excuse, power surge, whatever...

[Alex] Why would they say that knowing that it wasn't?

Trying to cover up probably, you know, I mean,

so that there was no panic, and everybody

could try to get on with everything, you know, so...

Then, mysteriously, 15 minutes into the attack the London Police Department orders

the number 30 Hackney to Marbel Arch bus to leave its normal route

and depart at the corner of Woolburn Square and Tavistock Place.

At 9.47, a 4th bomb detonates killing 13 civilians and injuring many others.

Note: Out of several hundreds buses in service that morning,

it's the only bus that the police take special

control of, and direct to Tavistock Square.

[Paul Joseph Watson] I've been walking up and down

on this road looking at the bus stops for N.30.

The bus stops have all the numbers of the buses on them individually,

there's no N.30 on any of the bus stops.

That's because the N.30 bus was specifically re-routed here on that day.

[Alex] To simplify, there's no bus stop here?

[Paul] There's no N.30 bus stop here, no.

[Alex] But that was in the news, it was specifically diverted here.

[Steve Watson] They admit the N.30 bus was the only

bus that was directed to different area or city,

for what reason, nobody knows, but they admitted it.

So it's very strange that for no reason it

would come down this road while it was bombed.

Remember while all this is happening the police are on Radio and TV

telling everyone that is just a power failure, an outage.

Meanwhile commuters on the bus were listening others radio reports,

where eye witnesses were reporting explosions.

The supposed bomber on the bus with the rucksack

became panicked and began looking in his rucksack,

in what witnesses said was a confused and frightened manner.

Weeks later, police detectives investigating the case

said that all 4 of the bombers on the 3 trains and

the bus didn't fit the Modus Operandi of bombers:

They bought two ways tickets, they played games of cricket the night before,

they had good jobs and happy families.

One of the alleged bombers

was caught by surveillance camera arguing with

the ticket clerk about the price of his pass.

After Scotland Yard detectives had a chance to talk with some of the eye witnesses

from the bus and the trains, they stated clearly on the record

that they believed that the bombers did not know they had explosives in their backpacks.

This was only one of many huge developments on the case

that only received bare mentions in the back of the newspaper.

The July 29th edition of FOX news channel's Day Side program revealed

that the so called Mastermind of 7/7 bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat,

was a British Intelligence asset.

Former Justice Department Prosecutor and FBI terror expert John Loftus

exposes the fact that Aswat was being protected

by MI6 and was clearly under their control.

[John Loftus] Aswat is believed to be the mastermind of all the bombings in London.

[Fox] From on the 7/7 and 7/21 this is the guy we think.

[John Loftus] This is the guy and what is really embarrassing

is that the entire British police are chasing him

and one wing of the British government, MI6 with the British secret service

has being hiding him.

And this is of real source of contention

between CIA and Justice Department in Britain.

[Fox] Hold on John, MI6 has been hiding him, are you saying he has been working for them?

[John Loftus] Oh, I am not saying it, this is what the Muslim sheik said

in an interview in a British newspaper back in 2001.

[Fox] So he's a double agent or what? [John Loftus] He's a double agent.

[Fox] So he's working for the British trying to get them information about Al Qaeda,

but, in reality, he's still an Al Qaeda operative.

[John Loftus] Yes, the CIA and Israel all accused

MI6 of letting all this terrorist live in London.

Now we knew about this guy Aswat back in 1999, he came to America,

the Justice Department wanted to jail him in Seattle because he and his buddy

were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon.

The headquarters of the US Justice Department

ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat.

[Fox] Hallo! No, hold on! Why?

[John Loftus] Well, apparently Aswat was working for British Intelligence.

Now, there's a split of opinion within US intelligence,

some people say that the British Intelligence fibbed

(lied) to us. They told us that Aswat was dead.

And that's why the New York group dropped the case.

That's not what most of the Justice Department thinks.

They think that it was just again covering up

for this very publicly affiliated guy with Al

Mousarou who's a British Intelligence plant.

[Fox] Our CIA says; "OK, let's arrest him", but the British say NO again?

[John Loftus] The Brits say no.

Now at this point, 2 weeks ago, the British know

that the CIA wants to get a hold of (Aswat) Haroon,

so, what happens? He takes off again.

He goes right to London, he isn't arrested when

he lands, he isn't arrested when he leaves.

[Fox] Even though he was on a watch list. [John Loftus] He's on a watch list!

The only reason he could get away with that, was

if he was working for British Intelligence.

He was a wanted man.

[Fox] And then it takes off the day before the bombings, this is how I understand it.

[John Loftus] ...and goes to Pakistan, and Pakistan arrested him. [Fox] They jail him.

[John Loftus] They jailed him: He's released within 24 hours.

In London we spoke with David Shayler a former MI5 agent

who was convicted of breaking the Official Secrets Act, and imprisoned for 6 months.

With regard to 7/7, there has been a witness report,

now included in a local British newspaper called the Cambridge Evening News,

in which somebody who was on one of the tube trains

says that he didn't see a man with a rucksack,

in fact after the explosion what he saw was metal

pointing upward from the bottom of the carriage,

that would indicate of course that the bomb was not carried on to the tube train,

but was in fact attached underneath it.

Now, again, nobody in the British national press is following that up,

I hope investigators from the police are.

A current member of British Parliament and a former cabinet minister,

in prime minister Tony Blair's government,

Michael Meacher was sacked in 2003

for raising important questions on the eve of the Iraq war.

[Michael] Atrocity of London bombings where 56 people

were killed, that was on the 7 of July, 7/7 we call it,

it's a very convenient way of ensuring there is fear, of ensuring there is control,

and of ensuring that those who are in the know,

and of course we cannot tell you because it is all secret,

are in a position of extreme power.

As part of our inquiry into the London bombings,

we wanted to investigate the suspicious death of Jean Charles De Menezes.

Within days of his brutal murder at the Stockwell

tube Station in the London underground,

evidence of a cover up began to emerge.

[Alex] What did you witness with the unfortunate Brazilian man who died?

[Witness] We, all we saw it was the police running into the station with guns.

That was all we saw.

We didn't see anything else at all, and then, after that, a couple of seconds after that

we were vacating down south (unintelligible).

That was all we saw.

We didn't see anything else.

[Alex] Are you sad for him and his family that is dead?

[Witness] Oh yes! But at the end of the day he

should have stopped and surrendered, shouldn't he?

If it had happened in his own country he would have been shot down as well.

With all that's going on, the police were only doing

what they thought was best, as far as I'm concerned.

[Alex] Why do you think that he ran?

[Witness] Well, because his visa had run out, obviously.

He must have thought the police running after

him just 'cause his visa had run out, I'd say.

The police were protecting, you know, the people who travel on the tube,

so I don't see any wrong in what the police has done at all.

[Alex] No, I understand your view on that. Why did they shoot 3 times in the head?

[Witness] I don't know. It's a lot of times to shoot him.

It's a lot of times to shoot him.

[Alex] How many times the shooters have shot him?

[Witness] Five at first.

5, and then, no, 3, first, then 5, and then it went up to 8.

[Alex] The police admit they tackled him and then shot him.

[Witness] Well they told him to surrender, didn't they, they told him to stop.

And he didn't, he carried on running, so, you know.

What else could they have done, as far as I'm concerned.

[Alex] 007, uhh? [Witness] 007. [Alex] License to kill...

[Witness] Yeah. I still believe there should be a

shoot to kill policy. I still believe personally.

But that's my views, you know.

I think people should give up their liberties for freedom.

[Alex] All right...

London police were later forced to admit that Mr. De Menezes never run from them,

wasn't wearing an heavy coat

and that a special army unit had killed him,

execution style, with over ten shots to the head,

at point blank range.

The British government was so desperate to keep the details of the shooting secret

that they went so far as to arrest an ITN television journalist

who had simply gotten a copy of what normally be a public police report.

Government whistle blowers and police have also

been suspended and arrested for telling the truth.

We had our details taken and we were threatened with arrest

simply for asking questions of locals outside

the Stockwell station and videotaping police.

[Policeman] Where were you raised? [Alex] Austin, Texas.

[Policeman] Alex, what's your date of birth? [Alex] 2/11/1974.

[Alex] Would you rather see my license? [Policeman] No, thank you.

[Alex] Here it is. [Policeman] Just that you're filming for a program in the USA?

[Alex] Exactly! I think they're probably broken and...

[Alex] So what do you think about this event?

[1st man] I think it's very bad this has happened.

[Alex] What do you think should happen?

[1st man] I think the policy of shooting should have been more thoroughly thought out.

[1st man] I'm afraid there must have been a terrible mistake here.

[woman] I feel very sorry for the family and very sorry

for the policemen that made that horrible mistake.

[Alex] Yeah. It's gonna be bad for everybody.

[woman] It's a tragedy all around, I think. [Alex] Thank you.

The police first claimed that it was a hot morning,

but official weather report showed that it was

around 16 degrees and that Mr. De Menezes was

"running down the street wearing a giant padded coat with wires sticking out of it.

Then he vaulted over the turn styles, charged through a crowd of pedestrians,

raced on to the train,

and was about to detonate bombs when the heroic officer gunned him down."

The authorities then conveniently claimed that all

the surveillance cameras malfunctioned that morning.

Police have now been forced to admit, thanks to watchdogs in their ranks,

that none of the cameras malfunctioned, and they have now released a video.

The government has now been forced to admit

that he was wearing a light denim jacket and there were no wires of any type.

Police that weren't part of the special

military unit didn't know why they killed him.

The police had followed him from his home,

they knew that he was a Latin-Brazilian working in England as an electrician.

They followed him for 30 minutes as he walked from his home towards the station.

Once in the station he calmly bought a metro paper,

paid for his ticket with his metro Oyster card,

and then walked onto the train.

Passengers then reported that they were told to get off the train.

Once they stepped off, still looking through the windows,

they saw the special force's police squat on Mr. De Menezes,

and shoot him over ten times in the head.

Witnesses said that De Menezes looked at the authorities as if he knew them,

he was like a scared rabbit and he was killed, execution style.

The question is why?

A special military hit team stalked him and

tracked him from his home to the train station

and then killed him on cold blood making sure he was dead.

It's well known that, if somebody has a bomb, you don't shoot at him,

and you certainly don't get near them.

No, Mr. De Menezes had seen something that he wasn't supposed to see,

he learnt a little too much and he had to be eliminated.

We were at the station just a week after he was killed

and many of the facts we have covered were already of public knowledge,

but still some of the locals made excuses for the police.

Within hours of the 7/7 bombings Israeli army radio was reporting

that Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister of Israel,

had been warned not to leave his hotel that morning

to attend the meeting less than an 100 yards away

from one of the train stations that was bombed.

The Associated Press ran the headline "Netanyahu changed plans due to warning",

then the current prime minister Ariel Sharon's office

instructed Israeli officials not to get interviews

to the foreign media concerning the warning.

Israel's foreign office attempted to spin the story

saying that they have given a general warning to the British that day.

Then several weeks later the head of Mossad told a major German newspaper

that he indeed had issued a warning to Benjamin

Netanyahu at 8:48am, 10 minutes before the first blast.

Conveniently for authorities the bus surveillance camera malfunctioned.

Something else happened that was convenient for the establishment lie:

All 4 of the supposed bombers' identification cards survived unscathed at all 4 events.

There was just one problem, in one case, one of the

bombers ID's was founded in 2 separate locations.

As the evidence mounts, it is crystal clear (that)

only criminal elements of the British Government could

stage the attacks and then engage on a cover up.

The reason the Netanyahu story is important

is it clearly shows that other intelligence agencies

were aware of what was going on in London that day,

and took necessary precautions to protect their Minister of Finance.

In 1994 the Israeli Embassy in London was bombed.

This is a time when I was in the service, I've

joined the middle east section shortly after that,

and I was actually astounded to read a document written by a senior MI5 officer

who had seen the information coming in about this attack,

and he said that he believed that the Israelis had bombed they're own embassy.

In any staged terror attack governments have to be extremely careful

to keep the operation shielded, compartmentalized.

Most people in government are moral individuals

who believe that their are standing up for their

nation's sovereignty or its national interest,

and it is absolutely essential to keep them in the dark.

One of chief tools used by governments as a smoke screen

is staging exercises or drills at the exact same

time, and exact same places as real events.

When the Oklahoma City federal building was bombed,

the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms

was staging an anti-terror drill with their bomb squad

on the morning of April 19th 1995, at the same time the real event took place.

On the morning of September 11, 2001 the Pentagon was running 5 separate drills,

two of the drills targeting the exact same targets at the exact same time,

that caused NORAD to stand down, believing it was just a drill.

And London was no different.

It's important to know that those taking part in the drills

need not know they are part of a larger operation,

in fact it's better for the conspirators that they not be informed.

One of the chief reasons this is done,

is so that if any of the operatives carrying out the attack are caught

by other elements of the government,

they can simply claim that they were taking part in a drill or an exercise.

NSA, Infopol9, and Echelon type systems that are scanning for terrorists chatter

would be fooled into believing they've simply picked up part of an exercise.

On the morning of 7/7 in London there was a simultaneous exercise

partying??? the exact same trains, the exact same bus

at the exact same locations at the very same time.

What we are supposed to believe is some kind of coincidence,

that there was also an anti-terrorist drill going on on 7/7, and again just like 9/11,

they were talking about attacks on the same targets,

the same tube stations, at exactly the same time as the actual attacks happened.

We learned of the drills of 7/7 on 7/7 from Peter Power,

the head of VISOR CONSULTANTS, a crisis management firm based in London.

Mr. Power was the former spokes person for Scotland Yard.

Mr. Power told national British television ITN News about the drills

[Mr. Power] Today we were running an exercise for

a company (unintelligible) in the private sector

and we sat everybody down in the city, 1000 people

involved in the whole organization, but the crisis team

and the most peculiar things was, we based our scenario

on simultaneous attacks on the London Underground and the mainland station.

So we had to suddenly switch one exercise from fictional to real,

and one of the first things is get that bureau number,

when you have a list of people missing, tell them. And it took a long time.

[ITN] Just to get this right you were actually working today

on an exercise that envision virtually this scenario?

[Mr. Power] Almost precisely.

I was on until 2 o'clock this morning, because its our job, my own company,

VISOR CONSULTANTS, we specialize in helping

people to get their crisis management response:

How do you jump from slow time thinking to quick time doing,

and we chose a scenario, with their assistance,

which is based on a terrorist attack

because they're quite close to a property

occupied by Jewish businessmen here in the city

and there are more American banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York,

a logical thing to do.

[ITN] So how extraordinary today must feel for you as it unfolds.

[Alex] He repeated himself to BBC radio five:

[Mr.Power] The thing that concerns me, is what

we will be doing for the 1000s of men and women

actually who are in London working, and I'm saying that

because at 9:30 this morning we were actually running an exercise

for a company of a 1000 people in London,

based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at

the railways stations, it happened this morning,

so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright.

[BBC5] Let me get this quite straight. You were running

an exercise to see how would you cope with this,

and it happened while you were running the exercise?

[Mr.Power] Precisely. It was about 9:30 this morning, we planned this for a company

for obvious reasons I don't reveal their name, but the listeners will know it,

and we had a room for the crisis managers, the first time we met,

and so within 5 minutes we had to put a rapid decision. This is the real one,

and so we went to the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures

to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

[Alex] If we use a standard actuary employed by major insurance companies,

to calculate the probability of these events coinciding in a 10 years mean,

we learn that the probability of this happening is greater than 1.3 protagillions,

to put that in perspective that's a number with 41 zeros behind it.

That is trillions of trillions and trillions and trillions

and still more trillions times greater than all the grains of sand in all the world.

To put that number in perspective it has 41 zeros.

Scientists using super computers have estimated that

the earth has over 7 quatillions grains of sand.

A quatillion has 18 zeros.

It would appear in some way that stopping the response of the emergency services

or providing some kind of cover for what must be

operations orchestrated in some way by the state.

The evidence is overwhelming, all the tell-tale

signs are there, of government sponsored terror.

Only the British government had the know-how

to carry out the attacks and to control the situation before and after the bombings,

and of course there are all the other admitted cases where the British government

has hired terrorists to carry out assassinations

or carried out bombings in their own country

as a pretext for political control.

And then of course there is "cui bono", Latin for "who benefits", who stands to gain.

In the weeks leading up the 7/7 Tony Blair's poll numbers

had fallen to the lowest points in his 7 years administration.

His Labour Party was sure to loose their parliamentary elections.

Support for the war was dismal.

Despite the bombings, which did improve his approval ratings and support for the war,

he was still only barely able to maintain control over the British House of Commons.

In the wake of the bombings Tony Blair's

administration descended on the British people

with the raft of tyrannical legislations, attacking the press, freedom of assembly,

and setting up the conditions needed for a Martial Law

take over the nation through the Civil Contingency Act.

And of course the bombings took place while world leaders where meeting in Scotland

so Bush and Blair could grandstand and blame the

whole thing on Iraq, legitimizing their war.

Despite the fact that the G8 World Summit was coming to England on July 7th,

the British government lowered the terror

threat on the London underground in early June,

and conveniently lowered security.

We were told that we invaded Iraq to bring the nation freedom

but Pentagon documents show their real point was

to Balkanize the nation into 3 or 4 sections

and foment endless civil sectarian civil war.

The true objective was to ensure the nation

remained in turmoil as a pretext to build permanent

military bases as well as delivering long term profits to the defense contractors.

Think about it.

The defense contractors make more money if they were just in Iraq a year

or now the projected decade?

United States, British and Israeli forces have all

being caught repeatedly carrying out staged terror

attacks in Iraq in an attempt to keep the war going.

In the interest of time we will look at just one example:

In late September of 2005 in the British controlled city of Basra,

two British especial forces SAS commandos

attacked a group of police at a checkpoint, killing 1 and injuring another

and when they were finally subdued and brought into

custody, their car was filled with plastic explosives,

automatic weapons, RPG grenades and other bomb making materials.

Why would members of Britain's most elite

fighting force, the SAS, be dressed like arabs

out shooting police with a car full of plastic explosives,

in a city that have been racked by sectarian violence?

The government of Basra in Iraq,

ordered that the British soldiers be held for trial for the murder they've committed.

Within hours of theirs incarceration, dozens of British tanks and hundreds of soldiers

assaulted the main Police Station in Basra,

killing jail guards and police in the process, to free the 2 commandos.

Over a hundred and fifty prisoners escaped,

and the controlled mainstream media reported on the internet as if it was no big deal.

We cannot wait for the final proof,

the smoking gun that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.

United States knows that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.

Saddam Hussein already posses 2 out of the 3

key components needed to build a nuclear bomb.

In early February of 2006 members of British government leaked documents

that the White House admits are authentic.

Known as the White House Memo it is the minutes of a pre-war meeting between

Prime Minister Blair and George Bush in the Oval office.

The minutes contains the discussion of a classic false flag operation,

where Bush tried to lure Saddam into war, using UN aircraft.

Mr. Bush told Tony Blair of the extraordinary plan during a meeting at the Whitehouse

on January 31st 2003, 6 weeks before the war started.

'THE TIMES' of London reported.

'THE TIMES' reads: President Bush had plans to lure Saddam Hussein into war

by flying an aircraft over Iraq painted in UN colours in the hope he would shoot it down.

The memo also contains details of president Bush's plan to have defectors claim

that they had seen weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist.

Well it's perfectly true that we now know that the

evidence, both in United States and in Britain,

which was put before the people, turns out to be wrong, it was known to be wrong,

it was fed to Parliament and it was a fed to

Congress in order to get the necessary support.

But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.

When the Congress threatened to block the re-authorization and expansion

of the USA Patriot Act in 2006,

President Bush announced that he would still enforce the law even if it was not a law.

That, by its definition, is dictatorship.

When president Bush was caught secretly paying off

reporters and newspapers and TV stations across the country

to the tune of 1.6 billion dollars in 2 years,

the governmental accounting office declared it

illegal, every single action by itself was a felony,

and there were tens of thousands of instances,

Bush simply said that he was above the law

and it didn't matter if congress said it was

illegal, he was going to continue the practice.

When a leader declares himself above the law you're living in an official dictatorship.

We found out from our time in the services that there are certain people in the press

who work as agents of influence of the intelligence services.

In Britain is very easy to reward people with privileges, with contracts, with honors,

with appointments to the House of Lords, with knighthoods and so on.

So no money has to change hands, but those people know very clearly

that they have the job to put out propaganda on behalf of the services.

I have no problem of course with the services hiring occasionally the media,

but if they gonna do that, like anybody else,

they should declare where they come from and why they are stating that point of view.

Fortunately as the result of that book: "Spies, Lies and Whistle blowers"

one of the prominent agents of influence,

in fact two prominent agents of influence: Dominic North and Cornt Cockley,

who both worked for the Sunday Telegraph, have had to resign.

Because, of course, once you are exposed as an agent of influence,

you can no longer do that job because people just simply say (that)

what he is saying now (is) because he is working to an MI6 brief.

When Congress informed Bush that secret arrest,

secret detention and torture was illegal,

he simply had his Attorney General Alberto Gonzales issuing a policy paper

claiming that it was lawful.

Known as the infamous torture memo, Gonzales said

that they were simply stop calling it torture,

and call it pressure and if someone died in custody from torture that was acceptable.

But Whitehouse Consul, John Yoo, went even

further in memos that he wrote for the president

that were used by the military as their authority to engage in torture.

He stated that they can even torture small children

in front of their parents, in some cases sexually.

And in another shocking turn President Bush is taken to signing pieces of legislation

that haven't even passed the Congress.

President Bush was also caught engaging in warrantless searches

using the National Security Agency to spy on the American people.

Bush claims the he had the Executive Authority to ignore any federal law he wished.

The 1878 Posse Comintatus law bars the military

from engaging a long enforcement activities against the American people.

Bush was caught using the Defense Intelligence

Agency, a branch of the Pentagon,

to spy on peaceful antiwar activists. He again claimed that he was above the law.

Bush then claimed that the Constitution gave him the right to spy on the american people.

Of course the Constitutional Bill Of Rights, says the exact opposite.

In the mist of the scandal, the retiring head of the National Security Agency

went before the National Press Club,

and informed everyone that there was no need of a warrant in America.

He chastised a reporter who claimed you needed a 'probable cause' to search someone.

He said all that was needed was that it be quoted 'reasonable',

and the government would decide what was 'reasonable'.

My understanding is that the 4th Amendment of the Constitution

specifies that you must have 'probable cause'

to be able to do a search that does not violate an

American's right against unlawful searches and seizures.

The 4th Amendment actually protects all of us against unreasonable search and seizure.

But the measure is 'probable cause', I believe.

The Amendment says unreasonable search and seizure.

But does it not said probable...

No, the Amendment says "unreasonable search and seizure".

The legal standard is 'probable cause', General.

You used the terms, just a few minutes ago, 'we reasonable believe'.

A FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act de 1978) Court, my understanding is,

would not give you a warrant, if you went before them and say 'we reasonably believe'.

You have to go to the FISA Court, the Attorney General has to go to the FISA Court

and say: "we have probable cause".

And so what many people believe, and I would like you to respond to this

is that what you actually done

is crafted a detour around the FISA Court

by creating a new standard of 'reasonably believe',

oh.. in place of 'probable cause',

because the FISA Court would not give you a warrant based on "reasonable belief",

you have to show a 'probable cause'.

Could you respond to that please?

Sure. I didn't craft the authorization, I'm responding to a lawful order,

right, the Attorney General has a word to the lawfulness of the order.

I would now read the 4th Amendment in its entirety:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects,

against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,

and no warrants shall be issued, but upon probable cause,

supported by oath or affirmation, and

particularly describing the place to be searched,

and the persons or things to be seized.

Notice that the 4th Amendment clearly states: no

Warrants shall be issued, but upon probable cause

and that must be supported by an oath or affirmation,

and particularly describing the place to be

searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

That is the definition of reasonable, reasonable

is having a witness and having probable cause

and specifically knowing what has been done, that is wrong and against the law,

that you're searching for,

not just "oh.. we say we're being reasonable"

The National Security Agency Director clearly knew what he was doing.

He knows that 99% percent of the Americans have

no idea what the 4th Amendment actually says,

so he claims that it's OK for them to spy on us without a warrant,

counting on us being ignorant. That ignorance needs to end.

Or, maybe, he's looking at a 4th Amendment that the rest of us haven't seen.

Several years into the occupation of Iraq, President

Bush told the world that they had freedom,

freedom of the press.

Now it's been revealed that if you write one

story critical of the occupational government

you're instantly arrested and sentenced on average to 30 years in prison.

In some cases reporters were simply executed or tortured,

then it came up that the Pentagon was covertly

controlling almost every major newspaper in Iraq,

and the PR firms were writing most of the stories in the United States.

But it's not just going in Iraq, billions and billions

of dollars a year are spent paying off reporters

planting fake news stories and producing fake newscasts,

the military calls this INFOWARS, seizing the mind of the enemy,

and they're treating the American people like an enemy.

When you learn that the Pentagon the CIA and the White House

are openly engaging in military style propaganda against the American people,

then you begin to realize why large portions of the American population

simply don't have their facts straight.

We asked David Shayler about MI5 and MI6 connections to Al Qaeda:

I've learnt of an operation in which MI6, the British External Intelligence Service,

had funded Al Qaeda to carry out an operation

to try to assassinate colonel Gaddafi of Libya.

Once I have become briefed on a plot in which MI6 was

funding a terrorist enemy without government permission,

I no longer would be part of that set up.

We also spoke with former MI5 agent Annie Machon,

herself, a whistle-blower, exposing MI5 and MI6 wrong doing:

I went public in conjunction with my partner because

we've seen so many dreadful things going on

and we believed that the British public deserves better protection.

My own... not as much government, but intelligence

services were carrying out an operation

in which innocent Libyans died.

David was briefed officially by MI6 officers on

their attempt to assassinate Colonel Gaddafi,

by funding Al Qaeda in Libya.

So I thought I needed to say something about that,

it took a long time to have the courage to be able to do that

with the newspapers in this country,

but eventually I decided that was the only way forward.

Ohm..We had to leave ours friends and families,

we had to leave our job our home everything in London with 3 days notice,

because the newspapers suddenly decided to kick into action.

I lived in exile for 3 years, in fact, when I actually tried to use a legal route

to alert the British government about MI6 funding Al Qaeda,

I was the one thrown in prison.

We then tried to negotiate with the government, we tried to say:

"Please, take our evidence about the crimes we have seen",

the government refused then, until this day 8 years on

they're still refusing to take David's evidence and my

evidence about crimes committed by our intelligence agencies.

We have sources that told the press, a source in

America, from the State Department and the CIA

who confirm the payments were made to a group in

Libya that was associated with Osama Bin Laden,

a document actually appeared on the internet,

which pre-dates the attack and describes exactly the

Modus Operandi they were carrying out the attack,

the time of the attack, the people involved, the Islamic Extremists and so on

that I've described, when I went on the record.

As a result of the attacks on 7/7, the British people seem much more complacent

and will allow the state to infringe their liberties in

a way that they wouldn't allow them to do otherwise.

While in London, I've learnt the Parliament had just passed the law

that would ban any type of free speech within several

miles around the British Parliament building.

Blair's approval ratings go up when there's an event.

Bush's approval ratings go up when there's an event.

What 'Muslim extremists' in their right mind

would carry out an operation that would empower the New World Order global empire

whose epicentre is London and New York and DC?

Why would anybody put up with this?

My friend never give up your liberties, stand up against tyranny, learn the truth

and find out who has the motif to scare you into submission,

to intimidate you, to fooling you into accepting

their global wars and empire and genocide.

At a time like this I think people are prepared

to give up a little bit on liberties, just a bit.

I mean, Yes, Al Qaeda, if there's nothing to

hide, there is not really a problem, isn't it?

I think we should be just a bit further on what we have allowed here.

I think if we've been too democratic, we've been too soft.

What is done to people who wish to demonstrate is increasingly worrying.

A lot of demonstrations, Geneva, the G8, Glenn

Eagles and many other places around the world,

there's no wish of those who demonstrate, in my view, for violence,

they disagree profoundly with what their governments are doing,

I'm not saying whether they are right or wrong,

I'm simply saying that they should have the right to do so,

without harassment, intimidation or, indeed, being

charged, attacked and being seriously injured.

[Brian] Is they the only ones who gonna be allowed to have the big loud speakers

out in the public areas?

It's just like in China are gonna be the States.

I'm not saying one of the things that does concern me is Brian Haw,

who camped outside Parliament in the square which

actually faces the parliamentary buildings,

faces the large iron gates where ministers come in and an MPs is going in and out,

he maybe ignored, he maybe laughed at, he maybe mocked, but at least he's able to do it

and some people may listen and he may have more effect than we realise.

Now we call that, we used to call that, free speech.

[Brian] What about your freedom lady? The Statue of Liberty...

[Alex] Oh, I did hear a rumor that the Statue of Liberty has

been brought in for a questioning. She may be with Al Qaeda.

[Brian] You're probably right.

[Brian] Six times they've taken me to court, oh

no, we took them to court this time, by the way.

We took Mr. Charles Clark, the Home Secretary,

and Mr. Ian Blair the Commissioner of Police

Obviously, (we were the) complainants, they were

the defendants, and it was found in my favour.

It's very much of concern that we've actually caught

an act of Parliament which in one of its sections

is clearly designed to prevent him or people like him,

putting across a message which they feel passionately about,

and which could be heard within the confines of Parliament. I find that very worrying.

I bull-horned Parliament 3 days before the law went into effect.

George Bush carried out 9/11. Do you think some people

in a cave, do you think some people in the cave

were able to have NORAD stand down?

Do you think that people in a cave were able to have all of this happen?

It's a total and complete fraud.

The New World Order is using power to scare you into submission,

and they will be defeated and here, in a supposed free

country, where they're trying to pass a law to stop this,

they're here to talk to us.

I witnessed local activists bull-horning Parliament and

the local police didn't have a problem with that,

but as soon I got on the bull-horn, and began talking about pertinent issues,

they became very upset and enrolled me into some type of trouble-maker database.

You've got to understand that governments stand to gain from terror,

to scare you into submission, to attack...

Dick Cheney in September of 2000, openly wrote a document

called Rebuilding America's Defences,

and he said we needed a Pearl Harbour event.

The US government wants to carry out terror attacks to blame it on their enemies.

9/11 was a self-inflicted wound, 9/11 was an inside job, it was orchestrated,

it was engineered by the globalists.

A few weeks after returning to the United

States, I then read in the newspapers in horror

that I had indeed been enrolled in a terrorist database.

The ID cards, the compulsory ID cards that have

been proposed for first time in our history.

Around about 80% of the British people oppose the introduction of these cards.

It's not just cards it's the database that go behind them,

that allows the state to access private information and so on

And yet as results of 7/7 it seems that these

things would be steam-rolled through a parliament,

where if we look at the moments there are assaults on civil liberties

as a result, of course, of the so-called war on terror.

Similar guidelines have been implemented inside the United States.

A Virginia anti-terror training manual lists

property rights activist as potential terrorist.

A Texas manual lists those wearing Levis

jeans, having cell phones, and who are, quote,

"friendly towards the police" as potential terrorists.

In Arizona they list those who make frequent references

to the US Constitution, as potential terrorists.

All of this guidelines have been produced by the

federal government and distributed at the state level.

The federal government itself has told police to be on the look out

for drivers who have road almanacs or driver atlases.

All across the planet, governments are restricting Free Speech

and setting up so called 'free speech zones'

to stop their populations from demonstrating.

Months later Paul and Steve Watson came to

Texas and joined me live on my radio broadcast

to discuss the aftermath of London bombings.

[Alex] We're joined in the studio by Steve Watson and Paul Watson,

[Alex] Guys, you've been in the United States

now for about 7 days, how have you liked it?

[Steve] It's been pretty good so far, obviously

it's all western cultures, so it's pretty similar.

[Alex] When we were in London, I mean there were so many facets to it,

what was it like to have the police march up to you,

and tell you to turn your camera off when you were

just on a public street interviewing, people?

[Steve] Well, I mean, the fear-mongering at the

time, we where there right after the bombings,

3 weeks after the first bombings, I believe,

but then there was the second failed attempt,

so the state of panic was still quite high,

even though Londoners, basically, were apathetic to the attack,

they just got on with their lives, they weren't

really buying the government propaganda on it.

We had case after case, where we'd be out in the street doing...

interviews with peoples and we'd be showing the video cameras

and there were people working right there at the Hard Rock Café,

and I'm like: "look at these cameras, there are everywhere, there are in plain view!"

And the manager comes out and goes: "you know,

thanks for showing that, I've never noticed those."

[Alex] What's your name sir? [Charlie] Charlie.

[Alex] I'm Alex. Nice to meet you, Charlie. [Charlie] How are you doing? [Alex] Good.

[Alex] What do you think of the new symbol of the United Kingdom,

is gonna switch from the Union Jack to the black surveillance camera

[Charlie] Oh, yeah. There's plenty (of things) going on around

and inside: they need the surveillance cameras every ways.

[Alex] But, I mean, it's gonna be the new national symbol.

Of course I'm being sarcastic, but really

it has become the national symbol,

4+ millions of surveillance cameras in the great city of London alone.

[Charlie] Besides that, you know, I hardly could see them here.

[Alex] If you don't see them there, then they don't exist?

[Charlie] 4 Millions in the city? That's the first I've even

noticed they're there, and I've been working here a year

[Alex] Out of sight, out of mind, huh?

[Charlie] That's it, that's it.

[Alex] That's kind of Orwellian though.

[Alex] You seem like a smart guy, because, you

know, only the smartest people in the inner party

know how to engage in double think and double speech

where you don't even notice the cameras that are there,

in fact, if you say they aren't there, THEY AREN'T THERE!

[Alex] Here, together, let's say they don't exist.

[Charlie] Oh right... They don't exist.

[Alex] 2 plus 2 equals 5. Hey!

[Alex] Hey, you could get an inner party membership.

[Charlie] All right, I'm into it.

[Alex] And, I mean, that was actual double think.

[Alex] Steve, Paul, do you want to comment on that?

[Paul] Well, let me read you that quote from Orwell, from 1984

"Double think is an unending series of victories

of your own memory's reality control.

To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete

truthfulness, while telling carefully constructed lies,

to hold simultaneously 2 opinions which cancelled

out, knowing them to be completely contradictory,

and believing in both of them,

to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it.

This is exactly what we saw over and over again in London.

[Steve] You've got a nest of what, 6 or 7 cameras and

people are out there saying they never noticed them.

It's like a survival mechanism to deny reality,

but at the end of the day is not even a survival mechanism: it's quite dangerous.

We were asking the attitudes of taxi drivers

about the bombings they were all quite ambiguous,

they cannot believe the government lied at that point.

[Alex] Do you ever wonder who is really behind it?

[Taxi driver] Oh, well, I've heard, there is people

who think that it's other governments behind it,

you know, British government, American government, people say that.

[Alex] Oh really, you heard some people think it's the government?

[Taxi driver] Yes, I've heard that.

[Alex] Really, how popular is that view?

[Taxi driver] Umh... Pretty unpopular I would assert.

[Alex] It is straight out of George Orwell 1984.

This poor women thinks that if you give up your liberty you supposedly get freedom.

[Paul] Yes, when we went to Stockwell tube station where they shot the Brazilian man,

we basically noticed this woman, who was working on the fruit store,

she'd been interviewed on the BBC, I had seen

her on there, so we went over to interview her.

We were talking to her, Alex asked if she would sacrifice liberty for security,

and she came back with: "Yes, I'll sacrifice liberty for freedom".

[Witness] I think people should give up their liberty for freedom.

[Paul] Liberty and freedom are the same thing.

We then asked her again, to clarify just in case she

made a mistake, and she said the same thing again:

She was willing to give up liberty for freedom.

Which is really direct double think, because the two things mean the same thing.

[Alex] We found the same mind setting in CRAWFORD, Texas, outside Bush's ranch

that we witnessed in England.

Populations who are willfully ignorant, who revel in being lied to.

We are on our way out to CRAWFORD where president Bush is vacationing for 5 weeks.

He's spent about a fourth of his time in the administration,

out here at his hollywood set.

Though he admittedly is afraid of horses, and the

cows, and many other forms of wildlife, and

of course he was born in Kennybunkport (Maine),

he spent most of his life there his life there,

he likes to put on a cowboy hat and a big belt buckle and strut around.

He meets with all these world leaders and

decides to basically how to carve up the world.

He meets with the Saudi leaders, holds hands with them, he meets with Ariel Sharoon.

He meets with leaders from all over the world,

but he certainly doesn't meet with the mothers of dead soldiers.

[Cindy Sheehan] They don't have any skin in the game,

so it's easy for them to say, you know, let's keep our kids over there,

let's complete the mission even though we don't even know what the mission is.

[Alex] That's going to be a theme, we gotta get them before they get us.

[Alex] Do you think Iraq attacked us on 9/11?

[man] Maybe not Iraq itself but the belief in the cause

that those people have there. Yeah, that's true.

[Alex] 15 of 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia,

and Bush is out of his ranch holding hands with the royal princes,

but then we gotta go into Iraq.

[Alex] No, but seriously, sir, it's a serious issue.

[Alex] What do you think they are coming for, sir? I mean, tell me.

[man] All of you are trying to make this "we're in bed with Saudi Arabia bullshit,

and this is all a big farce to get Saudi oil

and all that." This is not what this is about.

[Alex] So our government is not in bed with the Saudis?

[Alex] While in Crawford we ran into Ray McGovern and spoke with him about Iraq.

Ray MacGovern is a retired senior level CIA analyst

whose career spanned the administrations of John F.

Kennedy to George H. W. Bush.

His duties included sharing national intelligence estimates

and preparing the president daily briefs.

[Ray] I believe that they are still interested in permanent military bases there,

I believe they are still interested in

controlling the oil from that part of the world,

and so it will be: stay the course.

It will be 6,7,8 US troops killed every day or every week.

And, what's below the surface here, was

revealed to me by a very well heeled gentleman,

who come up to me after a speech I made outside

of Milwaukee, in a very affluent suburb. He said:

"Mr. McGovern, get real, I mean, what's your problem?"

He said: "you don't have any problem with...

...you don't deny that we need the oil, do you?"

And I said no. He said: "Well, you know, 6,7,8,10 marines a week for the oil,

you have to admit that is a very cheap price for the oil."

I said, you know, how I handle this?

Well the utilitarian argument is probably the best,

"I object to it", said I, "because we can't do it."

"There are 1.3 billion Muslims in this world...

...they are not gonna let us do it!" [Alex] It's already widening.

[Ray] The borders are porous, we can't do it.

"Well that didn't convince me", he said, "Well, I think we can do it!"

"Oh, suppose that your son was one of those 6 kill in Iraq last week."

And you know what?

He looked to me like it had never occurred to him,

and it wouldn't have occurred to him because it wouldn't be his son,

it would be the sons from the farms, it would be the sons from the city,

and so he said: "Well I don't buy that either."

So, maybe I will try a moral argument, on him.

I said: "Are you one of those that like to have the

10 commandments poured into the school houses, and in the courtrooms of this..."

"Oh, that's a great idea!"

I said: "Well, you know, if memory serves, there's one that says:

'shall not covet your neighbor's oil', I mean, goods."

[Alex] Don't bare false witnesses.

[Ray] "There's one that says you shouldn't steal,

and there is also one against killing a person,

so maybe you wanna subtract 4

and bring in the 6 commandments into the school

houses and the courtrooms in this country."

"Get real!", I said, "this is a moral issue: you

shouldn't be going around killing unarmed civilians,

and causing more violence where violence is endemic."

[Alex] And what did he say?

[Ray] He turned on his heels, marched out to his

SUV, preyed for cheap gasoline and drove home.

[1st man] I want the oil! Let's educate them, bring them in democracy and take their oil.

[2nd man] Apparently somebody who took too

much yellow acid and got the help story wrong.

[3rd man] The majority of the construction that I've seen as an ambassador,

I could say 90% of the construction that I saw,

wasn't for the Iraqis, it was with the American bases they were building

concrete structures, incredibly perfect,

designed to house 1000s of soldiers for a long period of time.

[Ray] The American people are being kept in the dark about all this.

If there weren't free shows like yours, and for few others in the internet,

you wouldn't never have the chance to learn the truth of this.

What Cindy Sheehan has done is... ...brought a human dimension to this.

She said: "Look, people are getting killed, including

my son, a lot of Iraqis are getting killed..."

"Why don't we face up to whether this war makes any sense at all?"

"Do we really wanna have our young people sacrificed for...

...for what?"

[4th man] We don't know. We don't know what's going on.

To tell you the truth my kids don't know the things

that are involved in the decisions I make in my house,

and that doesn't mean that they need to be involved in the decisions,

because I know better than they know, because I'm more informed,

and I'll give him the same benefit. You know, we did elect.

[beard man] Where have we lost our freedom?

[Alex] All across them. [5th man] Where?

There is an Homeless Security against topless bars,

There is an Homeless Security against toy store owners,

There is an Homeless Security against pot dealers. And that's wrong!

There is an Homeless Security against gang members. It's admitted.

Are you familiar with the Gulf of Tonkin never happened?

Lindon B. Johnson tapes and others relationed.

[beard man] No, sir.

[Cindy Sheehan] Well, you know, I just got to point out that

Wolfowitz, Pearl, Feith, Abrahams, Wormsurs???, you know people like that, who

this has been their plan. It's about, you know,

it's about imperialism, it's about abusing a nation's

national resources, it's about greed and power,

and is nothing about keeping America safe, or freedom and democracy for the Iraqi people.

[Michael Mecher] I believe that America, right

from the start of the Bush administration,

has been fixed, has been focused on the use of the American military power

in order to extend control, by America, of strategic areas in the world.

[Ray] Now we have the Downing Street's minute,

which shows that as early as July 23, 2002,

the head of British intelligence, just back from Washington, said to his prime minister:

"It's a done deal: the decision for war is inevitable,

the war will be justified by the conjunction of

terrorism and weapons of mass destructions,

and intelligence, in facts, will be fixed around the policy of war."

There's the proof that the intelligence, all these justifications in quotes for the war,

was a fraud, a fraud from day one.

[Michael Meacher] The Project for a New American Century, the think tank...

with the report called 'Strenghtening America's Defenses'

this is frankly a demand for full spectrum dominance by the United States.

I think the most chilling aspects of the Project for a New American Century document

is this kind of transformation about foreign policy,

this kind of strenghtening of America's defenses.

Is a revolutionary change and is not going to come, not gonna happen at all quickly,

absent a new catalyst of massive proportion, for example, a new Pearl Harbour.

[Alex] In Crawford, Texas we found individuals who believe

that weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.

[Alex] Ah, no weapons of mass destruction were found.

[man hat] Are you kidding me? Do you buy that? [Alex] Yes.

[man hat] Of course there were mass, of course

there were, there were, there were, there were.

[Alex] This guy would make a great citizen in George Orwell's fictitious 1984.

[man hat] We took them all away, does that still mean that, if he had the capability,

would he still? See, that's in the mind.

[blue cap] First, she's got an ad on TV, it said: "if

he didn't lie my son wouldn't have died, you know"

[Alex] But he did lie! [blue cap] He lied about what?

[blue cap] What did George Bush lie about?

[Alex] He said he didn't go for weapons of mass destruction?

[black cap] To drive the enemies out of our backyards.

[black cap] He never said that nobody would be killed, that's war!

[Alex] I think they're saying that Bush lied about WMDs,

it's not about troops who were gonna die.

[black cap] But did he (lie) though? But did he (lie) though?

[black cap] Don't ah... don't ah.., those weapons were there!

[Michael Meacher] The authoritarian powers of the state

which are available to government is very dangerous,

and I think we live in a state, we live in states, but the USA and the UK

where the powers to question, to call in evidence, to demand explanation,

to hold to account those who are in control, are gradually, systematically been weakened.

This is very dangerous in a democracy.

[Ray] Now Dick Cheney and John Bolton and others have been saying Iran

poses an immediate danger they could get a nuclear weapon, before we know it,

all the same things they said about Iraq,

and so we have to do something about that, now!

[Cindy] You know, he said the same thing about Iraq, like you

said, he was caught red handed, it's been proven to be lies.

Why should we believe them about Iran?

[Ray] I'm pleased to tell you, American people,

that the national intelligence estimate

just put out on Iran says that Iran cannot

possibly have a nuclear weapon for 10 more years.

Let me say it one more time: Iran can't be a

nuclear power, weapon wise, for 10 more years.

[David] We have to look whether our governments are creating enemies

so they can justify what they do,

of course two of the biggest funders in American

presidential campaigns are the oil industry

and the arms industry, and its in their interest that we invade places like Iraq.

[Ray] We gonna let the israelis or we are gonna do it ourselves,

to attack nuclear facilities in Iran.

Now people say that's crazy.

That is absolutely crazy, I agree.

The problem is, folks, that people running our policy toward Iraq and Iran,

were widely known in the 1980's when I was briefing the Vice President and others,

as "The Crazies". You come in on Monday morning, and somebody would say:

"Guess what the Crazies did late Friday night?"

And you know who, exactly, who the reference was.

It was to Wolfowitz, was to Pearl... All the same folks...

some of whom who deserted the sinking ship like proverbial rats, OK?

There was Feith, Wolfowitz and the rest of them.

They were "The Crazies"!

[white cap] There's a lot of other people that

have a dissenting opinion about this war.

And... has another view of this war other than Cindy Sheehan's.

And other people lost sons in this war, and daughters.

She should really go home. Do this little protest some other way, besides

trying to make things sound like she is the only voice of America.

[Alex] Three weeks later this gentleman and many other got their wish.

Free speech was banned for 100s of squares miles around Bush's Crawford ranch.

Now you can only protest on private property or designated free speech zones,

where no one can even see your protest.

The tourists have popped up here now. Let freedom win!

We decided to cap off our day in Crawford

by traveling down the public highway, toward where

the Secret Service had blocked off the public road,

two miles before the entrance to Bush's ranch.

We were promptly told, as if America was now a

3rd world police state, to get out of there,

despite the fact that we were credential press.

[Police] You need to get back in your car and keep moving.

[Alex] Really? [Police] Yes. You have to get off the road.

[Alex] Oh, off the road, Ok. Is it all right to stand over here?

[Police] Past your cars, where you can stand. [Alex] Oh, but the barricades are here.

[beard man] Let me get that straight:

Do you believe that the US government crashed those airplanes on the World Trade Center?

[Alex] Yes, the evidence shows it. [beard man] You full of shit! Take a hike!

[Michael Meacher] The whole point about 9/11 is

that it gave a pretext for a preconceived plan,

that plan is in the PNAC document, which precedes 9/11 about almost a year.

[Ray] It's clear to us that the administration

was using the corruption of the intelligence

to justify a war that need not happen.

[David] In my opinion when you look at the details in 9/11 and you read reports that

there were planes that supposedly contained terrorists, but did not take off that day,

and that the flight 93, for example, was supposed

to be aimed at the Capital Hill or the White House,

you're in fact looking at a 'coup d'etat'

that they wanted to destroy the infrastructure of American government.

[Ray] There are a host of unanswered questions on all of this,

the reason why they are unanswered is because this president,

this administration, will not answer the questions.

[Michael Meacher] Why is it, that perhaps the biggest question of all,

why is it that after on 9/11, 8:20am, when it was undoubtedly, without any question, that

one of those planes hijacked between 8:20 and 9:38, when the Pentagon was hit,

(that is) an hour and 20 minutes, no US airplane was put into the air?

[David] They were drills on the day of 9/11,

in which the American defense forces are supposed to be dealing with more hijackings,

obviously those would slow down the response

of national defense to the hijacked airliners.

If American passengers jet go off course and they're tackled by American fighter jets,

the default position is to shoot them down and yet

in this case, of course, none of that happened.

[Michael Meacher] There was the Andrews Air Force Base 10 miles from Washington,

it has a squadron of F16 fighters, none of those was put into the air.

This is absolutely almost incredible:

The most powerful military technological country

in the world, albeit under a terrifying attack,

was not able to put planes into the air,

which actually could probably have stopped at least the 2nd and 3rd hits.

[David] Another (question) was why George Bush

sat there with a group of school children

for 16 minutes after he'd been alerted to a plane going into the second tower.

[Ray] President is in Sarasota (Florida), he's told

that the 2nd plane has hit the World Trade Center

and the secret service guy immediately says: "We're out of here!"

The president stays for 30 minutes, folks, for 30 minutes!

Now how do you explain that?

I've talked to all manner of secret service people,

they say "We're out of here" was exactly the right reaction.

Everyone knew where the President was,

if not the President you might have had some concern with these little kids,

Why did he (Bush) stay for 30 minutes? Why was

he (secrete service agent) countermanded?

[David] The indication, of course, is he (Bush) knew exactly what was going on,

[Michael] I think all of this needs to be explained.

It wasn't in the congressional board,

there was no serious examination of it,

and there is this amazing statement made in the official congressional report

that the local authorities have not managed to trace the source of the funding (of 9/11)

and then, the most amazingly disingenuous statement,

(that) ultimately, is of a little consequence.

It is of massive consequence!

The head of pakistani intelligence of the ISI, Lieutenant Mahmoud Ahmad,

requested Omar Sheik,

who is a well known Islamic Extremist, who is now actually in prison in Pakistan,

to wire a $100.000 to Mohamed Atta who was the lead hijacker.

It is absolutely astonishing that, that lead has never been followed up.

As it happened general Mahmoud was actually on a visit to the US,

both before and just after 9/11, and so (were) many leading government officials.

[Ray] For people to dismiss this questioners as

conspiratorial advocates or as conspiratorial theorists,

that's completely out of mind, because the questions remain,

because the President who should be able to answer them, will not.

[Michael Meacher] We have plenty of evidence that the attack on Afghanistan was planned,

because after the negotiations with the Talibans broke down in United States,

I think I went to Houston, in Texas, in about July,

and there were later discussions at about this time in Berlin,

where US officials made absolutely clear to the

Taliban representatives in this famous phrase:

"Either we would provide you with a carpet of gold",

in other words, if you supply a pipeline across Afghanistan,

you ensure the security of the country you guard

that pipeline, then we can do a deal with you,

"otherwise we'll bury you in a carpet of bombs."

[Alex] In the years since 9/11, scores of highly regarded individuals

have gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11.

These include former presidential advisor and CIA analyst, Ray McGovern,

the father of Reaganomics and former Assistance

Secretary of the US Treasury, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts,

BYU physics professor Steven Jones,

former German Defense Minister, Andreas Von Buelow,

former MI5 officer David Shayler,

former Blair cabinet member, Michael Meacher,

former Chief Economist from the Department of Labour,

during President George W.Bush's first term, doctor Morgan Reynolds, and many more.

In early June of 2006, we traveled to Chicago to meet with fellow 9/11 truth seekers

and expose the official story as a fraud.

You cannot hide the truth! You will not hide the truth!

It's coming out! Your crimes are coming out!

Ladies and gentlemen 9/11 was an inside job! It's a self inflicted wound,

it's a government false flag terror operations!

Research it! More people are waking up every single day!

More people realize what the stakes are!

They love their families and they understand that the government

is carrying out terrorist attacks as a pretext

to re-engineer America into a police state. Why!?

To capture us to be their political slaves!

To use us as an engine of global empire to invade the planet.

While in Chicago we had a chance to, again, speak with former MI5 member, Annie Machon.

I'm convinced that 9/11 was an inside job.

The reasons, are enormous compelling reasons why I think it was an inside job.

Primarily the collapse of the twin towers which

looked to me to be controlled demolitions,

also the collapse of building 7 of the WTC complex,

also the fact that the air defenses was stood down that day,

who benefited from the attacks, of course,

and there are a lot of put options, put on the

airlines that suffered during these attacks.

So a whole range of different evidence that adds

up to something very, very suspicious about 9/11.

I feel passionately that we need to expose the government involvement in 9/11,

because, if we don't, they will keep doing this in future.

There will be another attack in order to justify another unjustifiable war.

We also spoke with doctor Morgan Renolds.

[Morgan] No matter how much our inert public wants to avoid this, it's eating away,

it's willful denial, it's willful ignorance,

it's eating away at the underbelly of America,

and we're not gonna solves our problems by ignoring 9/11.

The biggest smoking gun, then and now, is WTC7.

How can anyone watch it, without some kind of a psy-op or verbiage accompanying it,

and not look at that and say: "Hey, that building was just demolished!"

Just the way the Las Vegas Sands was, or the Seattle Stadium, etc,

It's just, there's no way around that! Here we are

in the so called broad daylight, it's 5:20 p.m.,

and we've got cameras on it...

...and what other explanation can there be for this

very conventional looking collapse, under 7 seconds,

There just has crime, inside job written all over it.

We need real convictions, we need arrests, we need prosecutions.

We also had a chance to speak to Professor Steven Jones, who is a Doctor of Physics,

concerning new bombshell evidence that conclusively proves

that thermite was used to cut the main pillars in the World Trade Center towers.

There is this molten metal, molten material flowing

out of the south tower, just before its collapse,

as large quantity of yellow hot metal, and then I read about these pools of molten metal

underneath both towers and building 7 after their collapses.

Now, that fits like a glove with a thermite reaction which produces molten iron.

You also see in these videos there's molten metal coming up,

you see this white ash, this dust that comes off,

and that combination: yellow hot molten metal and white ash floating away.

That's a signature characteristic for thermite.

And then finally we've got some samples of this metal, the previously molten metal.

Using advanced techniques like proton induced x-ray emission,

and the electron micro probe we find out what's in these samples.

We are finding iron, also sulfur, potassium and manganese.

These are characteristic of a variation of thermite

which is used to cut through steel very rapidly:

It is called thermate.

It's like... sure, you can take a knife, you take the butter out of the fridge and you...

cut through that butter.

Now, adding sulfur to the thermite, and also potassium permanganate, these chemicals,

it's like heating up your knife to a very high temperature.

Now slices right through the butter, even if the butter is cold, it slices right through.

Same way here by adding sulfur, and potassium permanganate to thermite,

it'll now slice through structural steel very rapidly.

But the end products will have sulfur, potassium,

manganese and iron, and that's what we see.

Thermite, had to be planted into the building,

which, of course, implies directly an inside job:

Someone had to have access in the building.

The in mid-March of 2006, actor Charlie Sheen went public on my syndicated radio show,

and simply called for a new independent

investigation, and questioned the official story.

Sheen knew the establishment lapdogs would attack his personal past,

whether real or manufactured, instead of challenging him on the facts.

So Charles Sheen preemptively challenged them to challenge him on the facts,

something they steadfastly refused to do.

Literally 100s of vicious hit pieces were written in newspapers worldwide,

every old rumor was dredged up and thrown at Sheen,

and a fresh raft of allegations was launched at him.

The only national television program that was

fair in its presentation was SHOWBIZ TONIGHT,

with A.J. Hammer on CNN.

On 'Showbiz Tonight' Charlie Sheen speaks out on a controversial theory

that the government covered up what really happened on 9/11.

Taking over 4 commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets,

that feels like a conspiracy theory!

Tonight we dig even deeper the host of the radio show

on which Sheen leveled his startly allegations.

Join us live right here on 'Showbiz Tonight'

The radio host to interview Sheen is

Alex Jones of the Genesis Communications Networks,

Alex Jones we are live from Austin, Texas,

to talk about Sheen's riveting comments.

Alex, as I've mentioned, the response we got for

doing this story last night was absolutely shocking,

so I wanted to know how it actually all came about. How

did your interview with Charlie Sheen actually happen?

Did you guys reach out to him? Did he call you? What was the deal?

[Alex] Well, just to make something clear, Mr. Sheen

has amazing courage to do what he's done.

He contacted me, he's been watching my documentaries for years,

he is one of the most informed people I have talked to in Hollywood on this subject.

Listen, for years Hollywood has been on fire with people knowing the truth about 9/11,

and I was the first to expose 9/11 on the day,

in facts two months before, I had intel that elements of the military industrial complex

were going to carry out the attack,

I said that they'll use Bin Laden, the known CIA asset as

their patsy to take the blame for attacking the towers.

So Mr. Sheen is only exceptional in that he has courage in going public,

courage that no one else in Hollywood had. I mean, here is CNN pool from Anderson Cooper,

a year and a half ago, where they said:

Is the government covering up 9/11? Could they be involved?

90%, when the pool closed, on CNN, said this. So listen,

I have my own syndicated show, I have done 4,000

radio interviews the last 4 and an half years,

almost no ones calls and disagrees now. We have

the majority view and we have the evidence and,

bottom line, there are declassified US

government documents, like Operation Northwoods,

that ABC news reported on back in 2000.

Operation Northwoods, google it, and in there

the US government, an element of it, said we wanna hijack jets by remote control,

crash them and blame it on the Soviet Union and Cuba.

Now, that was decades ago, this is why we believe this, right?

Then you look at the official story, the firefighters, the police,

100s of them saying that there were bombs in the buildings: they were told to shut up.

You look at building 7, detonators are going up, you can see the explosions.

[A.J.] And Alex, a lot of this was what Charlie Sheen was covering,

I'm actually just curious did he reach out to you, guys?

Is he the one who put on the call in to you? And how he went upon your show?

[Alex] Sure, sure. He called me a few weeks ago and said that he loves this country,

he has nothing to gain from this,

and, in fact, it is dangerous for him to do it.

[A.J.] Sure. Sure.

He said: "I love this country and my kids so much that I'm gonna do this, Alex."

And I said: "God bless you!", because now it makes for other Hollywood people

who got major pull, who know the truth, to start going public.

Look, its really simple, let's understand this, OK?

9/11 was an inside job, was a self inflicted wound,

and what Charlie Sheen is doing is just amazing,

and he can only be commended for it, and all

he's calling for is for a real investigation.

I go further at INFOWARS.COM and PRISONPLANET.COM,

We lay out how it happened, what took place and it's not just Charlie Sheen.

I've interviewed, CNN has interviewed some of this

people, the only network that I've seen doing it,

you guys have interviewed, there have been physics professors that have gone public,

there have been the heads of mining colleges that have gone public,

George Bush Senior's top CIA advisor, who briefed him and briefed Ronald Reagan,

one of the highest level guys at the CIA,

says our government is clearly involved in carrying

out terror to blame it on foreign enemies.

Did you know on CIA.GOV they admitted that they carried out terror attacks in 1953

to blame it on Mohamed Mossadeq in Iran as a pretext to overthrow him.

[A.J.] All right Alex, all good stuff, all stuff that

needs to be talk about, but, the question is, why?

Why have so many of the major media outlet not talked about these alternative theories,

that exist behind 9/11, why is that?

[Alex] Mark Twain said that in the beginning the

patriot is a scarce man hated and feared and scorned,

but in time when his cause succeeds, the timid join

him because then it costs nothing to be a patriot.

A lot of people don't have the courage that you have A.J.,

a lot of people don't have the courage of Charlie Sheen,

they don't have the courage of the German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow.

[A.J.] What do you think they're afraid that's gonna happen to them?

[Alex] They're afraid of being beaten up by the hordes of NEO CONS intimidators

who try to go up there with their gestapo, nazi tactics to try to bludgeon everybody

with their blogs and radio shows to shut up, but they've lost power because people

have learned they a bunch of liers. They lied about the Weapon of Mass Destructions,

they lied about everything, and now their credibility is totally blown.

The new White House memo just came out where Bush was talking about

staging the shoot down of Americas planes to blame

it on Saddam, that's public, that's admitted.

We have been getting an overwhelming response

to our "SHOWBIZ TONIGHT Questions of the Day, Charlie Sheen speaks out".

Do you agree with his assumption that there is a government cover up of 9/11?

Let's take a look at how the votes are so far: 82% of you say YES and only 18% say NO.

[Charlie] I had a sense that this thing was gonna get hot,

I didn't realize that, as you say, it was gonna go 'supernova'.

And, if they continue to attack me personally, it

only gives credence to our side of the arguments.

People want the truth. They want the truth and what's been offered to us

resembles nothing of the sort.

[Alex] He says: "Don't believe me just, check out the facts,

go look at the evidence, don't believe the attack dogs

just, it isn't about Alex Jones and Charlie Shenn or A.J.Hammer,

it's about NORAD standing down, it's about bombs in the buildings,

it's about Pentagon documents saying they wanted to carry out these attacks

and blame it on foreign enemies, this is all public.

That's why all these physicists, and politicians, and

people, and congress women, ideas are bullet proof.

And the New World Order better stop carrying out terror attacks,

we caught them over 200 times in the last

hundred years, western governments doing this,

Hitler does it, the British do it, the Russians did it,

governments do this, and I'm not saying the whole government,

very small criminal black op(eration), Black World, it's what they are called, operators

are carrying this out, that's the facts!

Please, go investigate, ladies and gentlemen, you'll discover the truth.

Look at America! It's turning into a police state, putting cameras in school bathrooms.

Nothing can stop the truth from coming out of 9/11,

and we are in danger of the New World Order carrying out more terror attacks

to keep this war for empire.

[Alex] Charlie Sheen then appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live.

Sheen again threw down the gauntlet

and challenged his detractors to look at the facts

of building 7 and the 5 frames from the Pentagon.

He's known for movies like Platoon, and Wall Street

and in addition to see him every week on Two And A Half Men, opening tonight

you can see him in Scary Movie 4, please welcome the indestructible Charlie Sheen.

[Jimmy] You are happy is almost Easter... [Charlie] Back at you, thank you.

[Jimmy] You had some interesting comments you were on

a radio show, you talked about 9/11, and you have...

is it a theory or you just don't believe the government account of what happened on 9/11?

[Charlie] I just had questions. I had a lot of questions,

and the form I chose to voice those questions is in the Alex Jones radio show,

just because he's a guy that I've been a fan of and followed for a lot of years

And, you know, I got attacked, and there were a lot

of hit pieces, the reaction was pretty severe,

[Jimmy] People get very mad when celebrities have opinions.

[Charlie] No, I understand, I understand, he's

not qualified, he doesn't, you know, he's just,

who the hell is he to have an opinion about something so horrible?

And, you know, it was sad because they didn't really take a look

at any of the stuff I was asking them to look at,

and then the evidence... or any of the stuff that generated those questions, you know,

and they said: "Oh, he is another tin foil hat wearing Hollywood clown", you know.

It's like the only, you know, I felt that the

only real validation I needed was just being

a tax paying American that loves my country.

[Jimmy] And it's something you wonder about, and

you would like to know more about, I assume.

[Charlie] Sure. Sure. [Jimmy] And did you study the tapes?

[Charlie] I've done a lot of research and it's not

just me, it's the people that have come before me,

the experts, the engineers and the physicists,

and the scientists, and the scholars

that raised a lot of this things.

And I took a look at their research and said: yeah, it didn't add up,

a lot of it doesn't add up, and there are these questions, you know,

there's two areas: there's building 7, and there's the 5 frames from the Pentagon.

Don't listen to me, do your own research, but I

think that, you know, what happened to a time

in this country when we were entitled, when we

had a Constitutional and the God given right

to be curious about things that didn't make sense. That's all it was.

[Jimmy] Because we have a lot of capable shows

now, and they need stuff to be mad about,

so, you know, stuff like this is like, oh boy,

we can yell about this for an entire week,

Of course with your dad being the president (in

TV program) and all, it puts a lot on the focus.

[Charlie] That's true, I should have confirmed

with him, before I came on the show.

Within weeks of Charlie Sheen throwing down the gauntlet on national television

the federal government released 2 new videos,

almost identical to frames released 4 years before by the Pentagon.

[David] You could have asked questions about why the Pentagon could be attacked,

this is basically the most defended building in the world.

Go look at the stills that released in the video footage of that day,

which claimed that a jetliner went into the side of the Pentagon,

and yet appeared to show that some kind of guided missile going in there.

[Alex] The establishment press chortled with glee as

if the new footage conclusively proved their claims.

[Fox] Tonight on the big story of the Pentagon releasing the 1st video showing

American Airline flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon on September 11.

Well, that's a question: Does this proves once

and for all that is where that airplane crashed?

Well, I would have thought that over the years that was never a question,

but some folks had a question about that. I think

that question is now once and for all answered.

Since the first days of 9/11, the Establishment

Press has only focused on the Pentagon controversy,

and not the 100s of other smoking guns and serious questions that have been raised.

We have to ask ourselves why?

As if it was by design the new frames only intensified the debate,

no passenger plane is evident in the still frames.

They are more than happy to endlessly focus on

the Pentagon, but they won't touch building 7.

It's amazing. Amazing, incredible, pick your word.

For the 3rd time today, it is reminiscent of

those pictures we have all seen too much on TV.

A building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.

We have the owner of the World Trade Center complex admitting on tape

that he ordered the building demolished on the afternoon of 9/11.

We must admit we have had such terrible loss of life,

and the smartest thing to do is pull it.

They made that decision to pull it and we watched the building collapse.

9/11 was just one salvo in an ongoing war against the free peoples of the planet,

it's all part of their "Terrorstorm".

Pentagon war planners now publicly admit

that 90% of their babel plans are psychological vs physical,

the information war has taken the place of aircraft

carriers, fighter bombers and Abrahams A1 tanks

and you the population of the planet are the target.

Put simply modern warfare is all about selling

the population to love its own enslavement.

The elite are waging war on the people.

Edward L. Bernaise is regarded by many as the Father of Public Relations.

He was born in Vienna, Austria; Bernaise was the nephew of Sigmund Freud.

Bernaise pioneered the use of psychology and other

social sciences to design public persuasion campaigns.

He published several scholarly works, still used in universities worldwide today.

On page 71 of his book 'Propaganda' Bernaise wrote:

"If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the groups mind,

is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will

without their knowing about it?"

Bernaise literally wrote a book on modern propaganda. His clients included:

Procter & Gamble, CBS television, the United Fruit Company, the American Tobacco Company,

General Electric, Dodge Motors,

and he also spearheaded the national campaign to fluoridate the water supply of America,

through the fluoridationists of the Public Health Service.

He was hired by multiple presidents to engage in

propaganda campaigns against the American people,

as well as the US Army.

Another quote from his book 'Propaganda':

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of

the organized habits and opinions of the masses

is an important element in democratic society.

Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government,

which is the true ruling power of our government.

We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested,

largely by men we have never heard of."

Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels publicly praised Bernaise on many occasions,

and stated that Bernaise work was the blueprint

used by the Nazis to seize control of the Reich.

Edward Bernaise advanced the science of propaganda light years,

but more than 60 years after his heyday, the science

of mind control is 1000s of times more sophisticated,

than even Bernaise had envisioned.

Since the dawn of man, bullies have attempted to dominate and control the tribe.

Human history has been one long struggle of the independent free human

against organized crime syndicates attempting to enslave them.

Brute force has been replaced with intimidation and propaganda.

We are manipulated into enslaving ourselves.

We are conned into believing that the establishment is our loving keeper

and not our parasitic master.

The New World Order architects are a group of predatory control freaks,

who have enslaved humanity and are desperate to keep control of their cattle.

The elite is threatened by independent free humans who control their own destinies,

they're threatened by intelligence, by beauty, by honor, by family.

They seek to control and steer the destiny of humanity,

in a direction that secure their power monopoly forever.

They're sadistic, they're callous they think nothing of human life,

only control and keeping that control.

The entire world is being engineered, designed to be a prison planet,

a control grid over free humanity, where no dissent is tolerated.

Once you realize the establishment is laughing at you,

you can begin to research the truth and start fighting back.

Once you understand their game plan, it is very easy to defeat.

Knowing who your enemy is, is half the battle, taking action is the other half.

You only have to free your mind and defeating the globalists will be easy.

"In a world of universal deceit, telling the

truth is revolutionary." George Orwell 1984