Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
So next we're going to move into the
next tool in the toolkit and that's Bokeh
Panoramas, otherwise known as the Berneiser Method.
For those of you, I'm sure many of
you have already heard of this and played
around with it.
For some of you it's like a brand
new word you've never heard.
Basically what it is, is it's a wide
-angle image created using a telephoto lens.
So it's essentially a photo stitch.
And actually I just realized I've never noticed
it on this one.
You can actually see some of the stitching
mistakes over here in the file.
But this is about 70 frames stitched together
to create this one giant image.
Each frame is about this big.
Ryan Berneiser is a wedding photographer out of
New York.
The Berneisers, Ryan and Tatiana.
I think we talked about their wedding experience
a little bit already.
But Ryan basically sort of created and popularized
this method kind of amongst the wedding photography
world.
We're actually going to link to Ryan's how
-to Berneiser Method video for you guys.
But what we'll share with you here is
just some of the little tricks that we've
learned in our learning curve through figuring out
kind of how and where to do this.
I want to show you a couple examples
to illustrate the technique.
This is not a Berneiser Method.
This is just, this is not a good
photo at all.
Remember we talked about when you're shooting from
below, perspectives working against us.
So that's where we want to have them
leaning over.
But this frame is 35, like one point
something.
So it's wide open.
But depth of focus is not only related
to the aperture, it's also related to the
focal length.
So in a wide focal length image, even
two point something, one point something, everything's still
relatively in focus, right?
Like all the branches are still sharp, even
at this wide aperture.
So this next example, what I've done is
basically from the exact same position, just took
off that wide 35 lens and put on,
I think it was the 85 1.2
and basically replicated this frame with that 85
at 1.2 to stitch in and fill
the entire frame.
And it gives a much different effect, much
different feel.
Still bad, still bad on the perspective.
And yeah, but, but that sort of illustrates
the difference.
It creates an effect that you can't achieve
with any lens that exists.
You can actually go online, there's some formulas
where you, you can plug in the focal
length that you used, the aperture and the
number of frames that you stitched together.
And then it will calculate like a theoretical
equivalent.
So something like this would be equivalent to,
you know, 24 millimeters at F 0.6
or something that is otherwise impossible.
So I'll just kind of show you when
we do play around with this, how we
do it.
This is one of the few times that
we actually turn our cameras and shoot vertically
because it allows us to get a little
bit closer and fill the frame with the
subject and not have to stitch across their
bodies.
Lenses that work really well for this are
your big telephoto lenses.
So your 70 to 200 at 200 at
2.8, 135 at 1.8 or 2
.0, the 85 at 1.2. Those lenses
work great for this.
And when, when we're drawn to do this
is when we're in areas where there's a
lot of depth and a lot of texture,
like this forest, for example, there's lots of
depth, there's lots of texture, there's lots of
lines.
It doesn't work in areas where there's large
areas of uniformity and there's no point to
it either.
Like a whole bunch of sky.
Yeah.
Plus it also, it's very hard for the
software to figure out how to stitch those
together.
It doesn't have the lines to put together.
Yeah.
But often if we've got foreground and background
and depth, we're thinking Berneiser method would be
pretty cool.
So what we do is, like always, just
try to, you know, coach them through some,
give them some actions, try to get some
nice emotion.
We'll get, we'll make a whole bunch of
frames like this, right?
Until we feel like we've got some nice,
nice moments.
And then we lock it.
You have to lock everything now.
So white balance, focus, obviously nothing changes.
Every setting remains exactly the same.
They don't have to freeze.
They don't have to hold their breath.
They just have to stay in the same
general position reference wise.
So you can then add in all the
frames around them.
So there I've got my pictures of the
couple and then I'm going to click, click,
click, click, click, click, click back to the
couple, click, click, click.
And I got about 20, 30% overlap
and I go up and then sometimes I'll
go down.
So just, yeah, just handheld.
You have to, you know, stay in very
close to the same position and some photographers
go in spirals.
We like to go left and right.
You got to keep coming back and referencing
so you don't miss any gaps.
20 to 30% overlap is a good
ballpark it seems.
And most of the images, of course, end
up out of focus, which is exactly what
you want.
Yeah.
If the light changes midway through, you kind
of have to start over.
Yeah.
Right.
You're going to want to size these down.
Okay.
If you try to run this with your
full res raw files, you're going to crash
your computer.
So usually it's size them down to about
a thousand pixels across.
And that way, even still, once you stitch
these together, you're going to have like billboard
size resolution, right?
Enormous gigabyte, big pixels galore.
Once you've, you know, you've chosen your favorite,
your favorite reference point for the middle and
then all the others, before you size them
down, run a batch edit on them.
Like, like basically a global edit based on
their skin tones, essentially put all the sliders
in this exact same place for all of
them.
Push play, go have a coffee, come back.
It's doing its thing.
It's basically going to try to figure out
how to stitch them together for you and
create all the layer masks and blend them
together.
And that takes a lot of processing power.
If you really want to go crazy with
this, there's actually dedicated third-party softwares.
This is all that they do.
Gigapixel panel something.
Yeah.
You can even do it in Lightroom now
to a certain extent.
Right.
Yeah.
I wouldn't recommend doing like a 70 frame.
Exactly.
Sam, Sam heard actually does some really great
portraits, just headshots with three, right?
So he's goes, you know, chooses a big
lens wide open and does like a one,
two, three across the, across the head.
And the depth of focus is just so
narrow.
Like the eyeballs are tack sharp and the
ear lobes are totally out of focus.
So it's pretty cool.
And if you really want to see somebody
who's pushing in the other direction, the extreme,
like 380 some photos stitched together across a
bride, like sitting in the forest, Ollie Sampson,
uh, Google him out of Australia.
He does some crazy Berneiser methods.
So if you're lucky, it'll stitch them together
for you, something like this, and then you
can crop.
And then you can do a master edit
on, on it from there.
Bring up the punch.
You can crop it from there if you
like.
Got a few other examples that just to
kind of look at the, the effect, it
sort of creates this ethereal, almost kind of
tilt shifty.
Um, look, it's not tilt shift though.
The plane of focus is not shifted like
on a tilt shift lens.
The plane of focus is the same equidist,
equid, equal distance from the lens, but it's
just super shallow because we're essentially using the
compression of a big telephoto lens, which doesn't
exist in these wide, wide lenses.
This is about, this is about, um, 80
or 90 frames stitched together.
We just had them walk back and forth
across this small little section a bunch of
times, and then have them stay in one
position ish, just for reference, and then fill
in the entire frame.
A couple more examples.
So this is kind of what it looks
like once you, once Photoshop does its thing,
all of the pieces of the puzzle that
it figures out how to stitch together will
be right here, and all the ones that
can't figure out will be stacked down or
above.
And so usually when it doesn't work, what
you get is just this big vertical strip
of a whole bunch of files that couldn't
figure out how to stitch them together.
And when we first started doing this, I
would say it didn't work a lot of
the time.
So expect that.
Like I'd say we were successful with it
40 to 50% of the time, and
now our success rate's more like 60 to
70%.
And we'll often, and even still, we'll say,
Hey guys, do you mind if we take,
take five minutes to try this, to try
something that might really suck?
And they're like, yeah, cool.
That sounds, that sounds worth it.
But we just warn them, it doesn't always
work.
Just so they don't, they don't aren't like,
well, where, what happened to that shot where
you did that thing?
Yeah.
Just in case.
If nothing else, it's something that Uncle Bob's
not doing.
So it's like, they've never seen it before.
So it gives you something to talk about.
But anyways, in this case, we had enough,
right?
So the rest, we were able to drag
manually into position and, and sort of paint
our own layer masks in.
You see all these layer masks were created
for us.
So then we dragged those ones into position,
dragged those ones into position.
Okay.
And then we start cropping.
Okay.
And, and filling in a few gaps that
we missed.
Yep.
Content fill aware.
Okay.
Clone stamp.
And also as we're cropping, we're starting to
realize that actually the sky, even though we
included them all, I just want to go
back.
It's kind of, these highlights are actually competing.
I really liked how their white clothes were
just such a contrast to the dark roots.
So we ended up actually cropping the sky
out entirely and just making it about that.
You like the sky?
I do like the sky.
And then a little cloning down here to
fill in the gaps.
And that's the last one, I think.
Yeah.
So, so that's something fun to play around
with.
Really, it's only practical in a portrait situation.
And for the most part, probably just a
natural light.
Yeah.
There's, yeah, we haven't tried to pull this
off in a, in an off-camera flash
situation yet, but maybe that's the next frontier.
All right.
So that's the Berneiser method.
Have fun with it.
It's, you know, it's, it's something else.
It's another tool in your toolkit to pull
out when, again, when it's calling out to
you, right?
Like you'll see, it's like, wow, the depth
here.
Let's try Berneiser.
And we're going to go out into the
field and demonstrate how we do this.
And hopefully we'll succeed.
Yeah.
We're going there right now.
Yeah.
Okay.
All right.
Be there.
See ya there.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.