Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
You've learned about gradient descents about
multiple linear regression and also vectorization.
Let's put it all together to
implement gradient descent for
multiple linear regression with
vectorization. This would be cool.
Let's quickly review what
multiple linear regression look like.
Using our previous notation,
let's see how you can write it more
succinctly using vector notation.
We have parameters w_1 to w_n as well as b.
But instead of thinking of
w_1 to w_n as separate numbers,
that is separate parameters,
let's start to collect all of the w's into
a vector w so that now w is
a vector of length n.
We're just going to think of the parameters of
this model as a vector w,
as well as b,
where b is still a number same as before.
Whereas before we had to find
multiple linear regression like this,
now using vector notation,
we can write the model as f_w,
b of x equals the vector
w dot product with the vector x plus b.
Remember that this dot here means.product.
Our cost function can be defined as J
of w_1 through w_n, b.
But instead of just thinking of J as a function of these
and different parameters w_j as well as b,
we're going to write J as a function of
parameter vector w and the number b.
This w_1 through w_n is replaced by this vector W and
J now takes this input of
vector w and a number b and returns a number.
Here's what gradient descent looks like.
We're going to repeatedly update each parameter w_j to
be w_j minus Alpha times the derivative of the cost J,
where J has parameters w_1 through w_n and b.
Once again, we just write this as J
of vector w and number b.
Let's see what this looks like when you implement
gradient descent and in particular,
let's take a look at the derivative term.
We'll see that gradient descent becomes just a little bit
different with multiple features
compared to just one feature.
Here's what we had when we had
gradient descent with one feature.
We had an update rule for w and
a separate update rule for b. Hopefully,
these look familiar to you.
This term here is the derivative of the cost function J
with respect to the parameter w. Similarly,
we have an update rule for parameter b,
with univariate regression, we had only one feature.
We call that feature xi without any subscript.
Now, here's a new notation for where we have n features,
where n is two or more.
We get this update rule for gradient descent.
Update w_1 to be w_1 minus
Alpha times this expression here
and this formula is actually
the derivative of the cost J with respect to w_1.
The formula for the derivative of
J with respect to w_1 on
the right looks very similar to
the case of one feature on the left.
The error term still takes
a prediction f of x minus the target y.
One difference is that w and x are now vectors
and just as w on the left
has now become w_1 here on the right,
xi here on the left is now instead xi _1 here on
the right and this is just for J equals 1.
For multiple linear regression,
we have J ranging from 1 through n and
so we'll update the parameters w_1,
w_2, all the way up to w_n,
and then as before, we'll update b.
If you implement this,
you get gradient descent for multiple regression.
That's it for gradient descent for multiple regression.
Before moving on from this video,
I want to make a quick aside or a quick side note on
an alternative way for finding
w and b for linear regression.
This method is called the normal equation.
Whereas it turns out gradient descent is a great method
for minimizing the cost function J to find w and b,
there is one other algorithm that works only
for linear regression and pretty much none of
the other algorithms you see in this specialization
for solving for w and b
and this other method does not need
an iterative gradient descent algorithm.
Called the normal equation method,
it turns out to be possible to use
an advanced linear algebra library to just solve for
w and b all in one goal without iterations.
Some disadvantages of the normal equation method are;
first unlike gradient descent,
this is not generalized to other learning algorithms,
such as the logistic regression algorithm
that you'll learn about next week
or the neural networks or
other algorithms you see later in this specialization.
The normal equation method is also quite
slow if the number of features and this large.
Almost no machine learning
practitioners should implement the normal equation method
themselves but if you're using
a mature machine learning
library and call linear regression,
there is a chance that on the backend,
it'll be using this to solve for w and b.
If you're ever in the job interview
and hear the term normal equation,
that's what this refers to.
Don't worry about the details of how
the normal equation works.
Just be aware that some machine learning libraries
may use this complicated method
in the back-end to solve for w and b.
But for most learning algorithms,
including how you implement linear regression yourself,
gradient descents offer a better way to get the job done.
In the optional lab that follows this video,
you'll see how to define a multiple regression model
encode and also how to calculate the prediction f of x.
You'll also see how to calculate the cost and
implement gradient descent for
a multiple linear regression model.
This will be using Python's NumPy library.
If any of the code looks very new,
that's okay but you should feel free
also to take a look at the previous optional lab that
introduces NumPy and vectorization for a refresher
of NumPy functions and how to implement those in code.
That's it. You now know multiple linear regression.
This is probably the single most widely used
learning algorithm in the world today. But there's more.
With just a few tricks such
as picking and scaling features
appropriately and also choosing
the learning rate alpha appropriately,
you'd really make this work much better.
Just a few more videos to go for this week.
Let's go on to the next video
to see those little tricks that will
help you make multiple linear
regression work much better.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.