Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,410 --> 00:00:02,350
Hello everyone, how are you?
2
00:00:02,370 --> 00:00:03,110
How are things going?
3
00:00:03,370 --> 00:00:05,290
As always, I wish you the best possible.
4
00:00:05,530 --> 00:00:06,950
In today's video I want to talk to
5
00:00:06,950 --> 00:00:09,270
you about an off-camera, but it is
6
00:00:09,270 --> 00:00:11,390
no longer an off-camera, but we are
7
00:00:11,390 --> 00:00:12,990
going to say that it is a challenge,
8
00:00:13,370 --> 00:00:14,410
because in fact it was, right?
9
00:00:15,510 --> 00:00:17,690
The point is that a few weeks ago
10
00:00:17,690 --> 00:00:20,210
I had the brilliant idea that I could
11
00:00:20,210 --> 00:00:24,290
organize two sessions on the same day and
12
00:00:24,290 --> 00:00:26,910
two sessions in the same location.
13
00:00:29,390 --> 00:00:31,229
So I thought that, as I say, it
14
00:00:31,229 --> 00:00:33,430
could be a very good idea to tell
15
00:00:33,430 --> 00:00:35,110
you how you can get a game out
16
00:00:35,110 --> 00:00:38,050
of two completely different couples in the same
17
00:00:38,050 --> 00:00:41,530
location and try not to repeat myself and
18
00:00:41,530 --> 00:00:43,330
try that even if it happened, or even
19
00:00:43,330 --> 00:00:45,570
if it took pictures in the same locations,
20
00:00:45,970 --> 00:00:49,250
in the same places, obviously that the photos
21
00:00:49,250 --> 00:00:51,790
of a couple and another were not the
22
00:00:51,790 --> 00:00:54,350
same because it was not going to be
23
00:00:54,350 --> 00:00:56,210
ethical and, as you know, I do not
24
00:00:56,210 --> 00:01:00,110
like repeating locations or repeating photos of a
25
00:01:00,110 --> 00:01:03,590
couple with another, so we thought, both Erika
26
00:01:03,590 --> 00:01:06,630
and I, that it could be really interesting
27
00:01:06,630 --> 00:01:09,170
for us to share with you this crazy
28
00:01:09,170 --> 00:01:13,910
experience and thus force me to see how
29
00:01:13,910 --> 00:01:17,390
far the limit was in my creativity.
30
00:01:17,850 --> 00:01:20,150
Of course, at first I thought I was
31
00:01:20,150 --> 00:01:24,350
Superman and then, when I landed, I realized
32
00:01:24,350 --> 00:01:25,930
that I am a human being like everyone
33
00:01:25,930 --> 00:01:28,750
else and that it was not easy at
34
00:01:28,750 --> 00:01:33,030
all to have two completely different reports.
35
00:01:33,790 --> 00:01:35,470
So what I am going to do in
36
00:01:35,470 --> 00:01:39,030
this first video is, well, explain to you
37
00:01:39,030 --> 00:01:41,170
some of the photos that we took in
38
00:01:41,170 --> 00:01:42,950
the session of Luisfer and Sonia.
39
00:01:43,410 --> 00:01:45,190
In some of the cases I am going
40
00:01:45,190 --> 00:01:48,170
to compare them with the session we did
41
00:01:48,170 --> 00:01:49,370
of Yasmina and Diego.
42
00:01:50,150 --> 00:01:53,370
Remember that we talked about this off-camera
43
00:01:53,370 --> 00:01:56,850
a few weeks ago, so what we are
44
00:01:56,850 --> 00:01:57,930
going to do is that, it is a
45
00:01:57,930 --> 00:01:58,670
small comparison.
46
00:01:59,890 --> 00:02:02,210
I am not going to fall into which
47
00:02:02,210 --> 00:02:06,370
photos are better than others, but simply compare
48
00:02:06,370 --> 00:02:08,490
the photos that I took, for example of
49
00:02:08,490 --> 00:02:12,050
Luisfer and Sonia, and in any case, if
50
00:02:12,050 --> 00:02:14,590
I repeat the location, I will explain which
51
00:02:14,590 --> 00:02:17,670
photos I took of Yasmina and Diego.
52
00:02:18,030 --> 00:02:21,290
I forgot, the two sessions were done in
53
00:02:21,290 --> 00:02:26,230
a office complex, in a research complex, as
54
00:02:26,230 --> 00:02:28,470
they call it, called Hualca, and it is
55
00:02:28,470 --> 00:02:31,130
between Zaragoza and Huesca, and it is a
56
00:02:31,130 --> 00:02:33,510
center in which it does not have anything
57
00:02:33,510 --> 00:02:35,710
special either, but it has a couple of
58
00:02:35,710 --> 00:02:39,770
buildings that, as you know, are all geometric
59
00:02:39,770 --> 00:02:43,030
lines, they are very clean backgrounds where you
60
00:02:43,030 --> 00:02:46,090
can play and it is not in the
61
00:02:46,090 --> 00:02:48,990
center of a city, therefore, in these times
62
00:02:48,990 --> 00:02:51,910
of pandemic, it was a really interesting location
63
00:02:51,910 --> 00:02:55,550
to be with the couples quietly and, above
64
00:02:55,550 --> 00:02:58,010
all, they do not wear a mask and
65
00:02:58,010 --> 00:03:00,050
be able to work as God commands, okay?
66
00:03:00,850 --> 00:03:02,710
So I don't roll up anymore and we
67
00:03:02,710 --> 00:03:05,270
are going to start talking about some of
68
00:03:05,270 --> 00:03:07,550
the photos that I took, the most interesting
69
00:03:07,550 --> 00:03:09,790
photos, as I tell you, and how they
70
00:03:09,790 --> 00:03:10,690
were worked, okay?
71
00:03:11,030 --> 00:03:13,110
The first image of all I took of
72
00:03:13,110 --> 00:03:14,770
Luisfer and Sonia, or the one I want
73
00:03:14,770 --> 00:03:16,810
to show you, is this one, in which,
74
00:03:17,390 --> 00:03:18,790
as you can see, it is a building
75
00:03:18,790 --> 00:03:20,650
or it is the side of a building
76
00:03:20,650 --> 00:03:23,030
in which they are all large windows and
77
00:03:23,030 --> 00:03:26,130
form those lines or those triangular shapes, and
78
00:03:26,130 --> 00:03:28,890
I thought at first that it could be
79
00:03:28,890 --> 00:03:33,830
interesting to try to integrate the couple into
80
00:03:33,830 --> 00:03:34,650
the building, right?
81
00:03:34,890 --> 00:03:37,470
The first idea I had was this, it
82
00:03:37,470 --> 00:03:40,110
is simply to ask both one and the
83
00:03:40,110 --> 00:03:42,950
other to try to integrate into the master
84
00:03:42,950 --> 00:03:45,390
lines of what the building was, and I
85
00:03:45,390 --> 00:03:48,310
liked how it could fit, but at the
86
00:03:48,310 --> 00:03:50,430
same time, at that very moment, when I
87
00:03:50,430 --> 00:03:55,710
took this one as such, I realized that,
88
00:03:56,050 --> 00:03:57,390
as I have already told you some time
89
00:03:57,390 --> 00:03:59,030
ago, that I was repeating myself again with
90
00:03:59,030 --> 00:04:02,330
the poses and all that, so I quickly
91
00:04:02,330 --> 00:04:06,530
changed my mind and asked them to approach
92
00:04:06,530 --> 00:04:10,110
me completely, because the truth is that I
93
00:04:10,110 --> 00:04:13,710
preferred to explore more in the soul of
94
00:04:13,710 --> 00:04:16,930
the couple than in acting or not in
95
00:04:16,930 --> 00:04:19,510
poses that I had already repeated on some
96
00:04:19,510 --> 00:04:21,170
other occasion in the past, right?
97
00:04:21,450 --> 00:04:23,630
So I told them to come here and
98
00:04:23,630 --> 00:04:27,590
simply, as an important note, as in the
99
00:04:27,590 --> 00:04:30,610
previous photo I was integrating the couple in
100
00:04:30,610 --> 00:04:32,830
the location or in the architecture of the
101
00:04:32,830 --> 00:04:35,090
building itself, in this one too.
102
00:04:35,530 --> 00:04:38,010
For me it was very important that those
103
00:04:38,010 --> 00:04:40,790
two master lines, for me they were super
104
00:04:40,790 --> 00:04:44,550
important, that the heads of both were perfectly
105
00:04:44,550 --> 00:04:47,270
fitted there, so I told them to get
106
00:04:47,270 --> 00:04:51,430
together, above all, and I already started trying
107
00:04:51,430 --> 00:04:54,970
to play with them in a more interesting
108
00:04:54,970 --> 00:04:55,070
way.
109
00:04:55,690 --> 00:04:58,510
Of course, I really like the photograph more
110
00:04:58,510 --> 00:05:00,570
than the previous one, it has twice the
111
00:05:00,570 --> 00:05:02,530
potential, I think it is much more interesting,
112
00:05:03,250 --> 00:05:06,050
but as a note, okay?
113
00:05:06,330 --> 00:05:09,190
I like it, but maybe I should have
114
00:05:09,190 --> 00:05:12,050
worked a little more on the hands and
115
00:05:12,050 --> 00:05:15,250
got something more interesting, maybe, okay?
116
00:05:15,390 --> 00:05:17,450
I mean, it's not bad, quite the opposite,
117
00:05:17,970 --> 00:05:20,790
but Sonia's hand, for example, did not end
118
00:05:20,790 --> 00:05:23,230
up being 100% perfect, okay?
119
00:05:24,770 --> 00:05:28,730
Without changing much, that is, without going too
120
00:05:28,730 --> 00:05:32,610
far and working on the acting that I
121
00:05:32,610 --> 00:05:34,890
was commenting on, on playing with a couple,
122
00:05:35,090 --> 00:05:37,670
close, hands and all this, let's change to
123
00:05:37,670 --> 00:05:39,170
this image, okay?
124
00:05:39,810 --> 00:05:42,530
In which, to my liking, it works much
125
00:05:42,530 --> 00:05:44,150
better, that hand game is not so evident
126
00:05:44,150 --> 00:05:48,550
and, again, although I already told you that
127
00:05:48,550 --> 00:05:50,330
I would talk to you much more about
128
00:05:50,330 --> 00:05:55,510
how to capture the bride's hair that I
129
00:05:55,510 --> 00:05:59,830
photographed in the foreground, it is not the
130
00:05:59,830 --> 00:06:02,110
same record or it is not the same
131
00:06:02,110 --> 00:06:05,110
story as in the previous images that I
132
00:06:05,110 --> 00:06:06,690
had shown you, such as this one of
133
00:06:06,690 --> 00:06:10,130
Yasmina, but after all, the essence is the
134
00:06:10,130 --> 00:06:15,230
same, although clearly, well, as a personal opinion,
135
00:06:16,330 --> 00:06:20,150
this photograph of Luisfer with Sonia seems more
136
00:06:20,150 --> 00:06:21,710
interesting to me, although I don't want to
137
00:06:21,710 --> 00:06:23,710
compare them, it seems more interesting to me
138
00:06:23,710 --> 00:06:27,450
because all the weight goes to one side,
139
00:06:28,030 --> 00:06:30,210
that is, I do not have the hair
140
00:06:30,210 --> 00:06:32,930
in the foreground, as is the case, for
141
00:06:32,930 --> 00:06:35,510
example, of Yasmina, and I do have, in
142
00:06:35,510 --> 00:06:38,030
the case of them, the hair focused on
143
00:06:38,030 --> 00:06:41,610
the right and I have to the left,
144
00:06:41,930 --> 00:06:44,510
to them, completely out of focus, but it
145
00:06:44,510 --> 00:06:47,290
is understood, it is understood perfectly how, that
146
00:06:47,290 --> 00:06:49,730
is, how, for example, Sonia is trying to
147
00:06:49,730 --> 00:06:52,570
touch him, how there is a certain connection,
148
00:06:52,770 --> 00:06:56,250
so the image is perfectly balanced and I
149
00:06:56,250 --> 00:06:59,830
think it has a perhaps a little more
150
00:06:59,830 --> 00:07:00,150
interest, right?
151
00:07:00,890 --> 00:07:04,230
Let's go to another image, for me it
152
00:07:04,230 --> 00:07:09,310
may be one of the most interesting images,
153
00:07:09,730 --> 00:07:11,850
and not only for me, but especially for
154
00:07:11,850 --> 00:07:16,410
the couple, because in fact, this same location,
155
00:07:16,870 --> 00:07:18,490
you will see that I repeated it completely,
156
00:07:19,170 --> 00:07:20,550
I repeated it, that is, it is the
157
00:07:20,550 --> 00:07:24,230
same absolute, absolute, I mean, with the same
158
00:07:24,230 --> 00:07:26,930
formula, all the same, and I am going
159
00:07:26,930 --> 00:07:28,430
to tell you first how we took the
160
00:07:28,430 --> 00:07:30,610
photo of, that is, of Luísfer with Sonia,
161
00:07:30,970 --> 00:07:32,650
and then we compare it with that of
162
00:07:32,650 --> 00:07:33,650
Yasmina and Diego, okay?
163
00:07:34,050 --> 00:07:36,410
But what I wanted first was that when
164
00:07:36,410 --> 00:07:39,650
I found this kind of cactus, it occurred
165
00:07:39,650 --> 00:07:42,070
to me that it could be interesting that,
166
00:07:42,410 --> 00:07:45,770
that is, that I asked both Luísfer and
167
00:07:45,770 --> 00:07:48,670
Sonia to go up to the upper part,
168
00:07:48,850 --> 00:07:51,010
to the upper part of the hill in
169
00:07:51,010 --> 00:07:53,550
which they would be placed behind the whole
170
00:07:53,550 --> 00:07:56,410
set of plants or cactus that was there.
171
00:07:57,050 --> 00:07:59,490
Of course, I thought that although the light
172
00:07:59,490 --> 00:08:03,010
was in my favor, it was not powerful
173
00:08:03,010 --> 00:08:07,530
enough, powerful, because Luísfer and Sonia's session was
174
00:08:07,530 --> 00:08:10,010
held at the first hour of the morning
175
00:08:10,010 --> 00:08:13,550
and Yasmina and Diego's session was held in
176
00:08:13,550 --> 00:08:16,010
the afternoon, so the light was completely different.
177
00:08:16,550 --> 00:08:18,290
As I tell you, I thought it could
178
00:08:18,290 --> 00:08:20,630
be interesting to add a touch of flash,
179
00:08:20,890 --> 00:08:23,010
I think I would use a medium or
180
00:08:23,010 --> 00:08:25,110
a quarter of power, and the flash, as
181
00:08:25,110 --> 00:08:27,730
you are seeing, I brought it quite close
182
00:08:27,730 --> 00:08:31,070
to them, up to more or less, as
183
00:08:31,070 --> 00:08:34,289
you can see, 45 degrees, inclination more or
184
00:08:34,289 --> 00:08:38,289
less, power, I have already told you, and
185
00:08:38,289 --> 00:08:40,990
I simply asked them to come closer, to
186
00:08:40,990 --> 00:08:43,230
put their heads together, and the flash, I
187
00:08:43,230 --> 00:08:47,810
was worried that it was perfectly, perfectly for
188
00:08:47,810 --> 00:08:52,310
their faces, so more or less, it started
189
00:08:52,310 --> 00:08:52,670
to shoot.
190
00:08:53,430 --> 00:08:57,310
Important points, you already know that I don't
191
00:08:57,310 --> 00:09:01,910
like, sorry, you already know that I don't
192
00:09:01,910 --> 00:09:07,070
like showing the ground, I mean, although it
193
00:09:07,070 --> 00:09:09,270
is obvious that the couple is standing, but
194
00:09:09,270 --> 00:09:12,810
I don't give so much evidence, and what
195
00:09:12,810 --> 00:09:15,270
I like is that you can only see
196
00:09:15,270 --> 00:09:17,750
Cactus, and in a point between the Cactus
197
00:09:17,750 --> 00:09:20,450
you can see the couple, and the truth
198
00:09:20,450 --> 00:09:23,130
is that it attracts me quite well.
199
00:09:24,930 --> 00:09:26,770
The truth is that when I already had
200
00:09:26,770 --> 00:09:28,390
it, when I had it, for example, edited,
201
00:09:28,590 --> 00:09:30,050
well, when I had it shot and when
202
00:09:30,050 --> 00:09:31,310
I sat down on the computer, I had
203
00:09:31,310 --> 00:09:32,890
doubts whether to make it black and white
204
00:09:32,890 --> 00:09:34,470
or make it in color, okay?
205
00:09:35,610 --> 00:09:37,490
Finally, I think that in this case, in
206
00:09:37,490 --> 00:09:39,870
the case of, for example, this image, it
207
00:09:39,870 --> 00:09:43,550
works better in black and white, because, to
208
00:09:43,550 --> 00:09:47,910
my liking, I used a too closed diaphragm,
209
00:09:48,190 --> 00:09:50,310
and there is not so much difference between
210
00:09:50,310 --> 00:09:51,910
the foreground and the background.
211
00:09:52,090 --> 00:09:56,410
When everything is focused, this, right?
212
00:09:56,750 --> 00:09:59,150
If we compare it now, or if we
213
00:09:59,150 --> 00:10:00,910
put it just at the same time, okay?
214
00:10:01,030 --> 00:10:05,270
Both a photograph, the one I showed you,
215
00:10:05,450 --> 00:10:08,270
how, if I show you now the photograph,
216
00:10:08,410 --> 00:10:11,650
for example, of Yasmina and Diego, we are
217
00:10:11,650 --> 00:10:15,290
seeing that Yasmina and Diego, to my liking,
218
00:10:15,510 --> 00:10:18,250
works a little better, just a little, perhaps
219
00:10:18,250 --> 00:10:21,170
because the only difference is that the diaphragm
220
00:10:21,170 --> 00:10:24,950
in Yasmina and Diego is much more open,
221
00:10:25,450 --> 00:10:29,690
and there is a big difference, or the
222
00:10:29,690 --> 00:10:32,470
point, the point of interest, which is the
223
00:10:32,470 --> 00:10:34,290
background, that is, which is the couple, is
224
00:10:34,290 --> 00:10:36,650
easier, for example, to understand, and you are
225
00:10:36,650 --> 00:10:39,370
not so distracted by the rest of the
226
00:10:39,370 --> 00:10:41,950
image, since in the previous image, with a
227
00:10:41,950 --> 00:10:45,030
diaphragm 8, everything was focused, and in this
228
00:10:45,030 --> 00:10:49,110
image, with such an open diaphragm, only the
229
00:10:49,110 --> 00:10:50,130
couple is practically focused, with which it has
230
00:10:50,130 --> 00:10:52,670
a reading, well, twice as simple.
231
00:10:53,010 --> 00:10:57,290
If we compare them again, both one and
232
00:10:57,290 --> 00:11:02,630
the other, I must say that, although the
233
00:11:02,630 --> 00:11:04,910
brightness, or the light, or the point of
234
00:11:04,910 --> 00:11:08,890
interest, sorry, of Yasmina and Diego seems more
235
00:11:08,890 --> 00:11:12,570
attractive, it is true that the composition of
236
00:11:12,570 --> 00:11:16,230
this image, that of Luis Ferr, is, to
237
00:11:16,230 --> 00:11:19,810
my liking, much more interesting, because it creates
238
00:11:19,810 --> 00:11:24,910
a more harmonious shape, and I think it
239
00:11:24,910 --> 00:11:28,650
is much, much better, perhaps, than the previous
240
00:11:28,650 --> 00:11:28,750
one.
241
00:11:29,110 --> 00:11:36,230
The reason why I repeated location, formula, lighting,
242
00:11:36,590 --> 00:11:38,830
I mean, they are two drops of water,
243
00:11:39,010 --> 00:11:42,790
practically, the reason why I did this was
244
00:11:42,790 --> 00:11:46,130
because it seemed to me such a beautiful
245
00:11:46,130 --> 00:11:50,490
photo that I thought that both couples should
246
00:11:50,490 --> 00:11:51,050
have it.
247
00:11:51,590 --> 00:11:54,970
Why deprive a couple of a beautiful photo
248
00:11:54,970 --> 00:11:56,410
if the other one also had it?
249
00:11:56,610 --> 00:11:58,250
Well, as I was telling you, we were
250
00:11:58,250 --> 00:12:00,090
in the same location, okay?
251
00:12:00,250 --> 00:12:03,470
And constantly thinking that if we visited a
252
00:12:03,470 --> 00:12:06,750
location, if we later visited it again with
253
00:12:06,750 --> 00:12:08,550
the other couple, we could not repeat ourselves,
254
00:12:08,590 --> 00:12:12,210
because otherwise the challenge would be taken for
255
00:12:12,210 --> 00:12:12,730
the ass, right?
256
00:12:13,090 --> 00:12:16,870
So then, we went to stop in this
257
00:12:16,870 --> 00:12:18,870
little corner, as you can see, it is
258
00:12:18,870 --> 00:12:22,170
a green background, it is a completely clean
259
00:12:22,170 --> 00:12:25,410
wall, and, I mean, remember that with the
260
00:12:25,410 --> 00:12:27,470
session of Yasmina and Diego we were playing
261
00:12:27,470 --> 00:12:30,950
with the hat in the same background, completely
262
00:12:30,950 --> 00:12:32,430
in the same background, okay?
263
00:12:32,850 --> 00:12:36,290
But I thought that this time I was
264
00:12:36,290 --> 00:12:37,610
not going to play with any kind of
265
00:12:37,610 --> 00:12:40,610
hat, so then I thought that what we
266
00:12:40,610 --> 00:12:43,530
were going to play was with that trunk
267
00:12:43,530 --> 00:12:46,330
that was right in the middle, and what
268
00:12:46,330 --> 00:12:48,890
was going to be like the trunk, I
269
00:12:48,890 --> 00:12:51,770
wanted to simulate it, I wanted to show
270
00:12:51,770 --> 00:12:54,730
how the trunk was part of them, and
271
00:12:54,730 --> 00:12:58,330
that's where that formula or the idea of
272
00:12:58,330 --> 00:13:00,150
saying that both of them would close their
273
00:13:00,150 --> 00:13:02,210
eyes came from, and it seemed so interesting
274
00:13:02,210 --> 00:13:05,770
because it seemed that the tree had arms,
275
00:13:05,970 --> 00:13:08,230
that it was the same tree that was
276
00:13:08,230 --> 00:13:11,970
covering or that was hiding, for example, the
277
00:13:11,970 --> 00:13:12,510
two eyes.
278
00:13:13,110 --> 00:13:14,570
Yes, a little bit how to explain very,
279
00:13:14,690 --> 00:13:17,470
very quickly, you know that always the starting
280
00:13:17,470 --> 00:13:19,570
point is to think that we find a
281
00:13:19,570 --> 00:13:21,770
background that is interesting, in which the couple
282
00:13:21,770 --> 00:13:23,230
stands out, the light that more or less
283
00:13:23,230 --> 00:13:25,350
works, and then what we are going to
284
00:13:25,350 --> 00:13:27,610
share or divide the frame always in two
285
00:13:27,610 --> 00:13:27,950
parts.
286
00:13:28,270 --> 00:13:32,250
That trunk helped me perfectly to separate both,
287
00:13:32,430 --> 00:13:32,590
okay?
288
00:13:32,810 --> 00:13:35,410
And that trunk at the same time helped
289
00:13:35,410 --> 00:13:36,450
me to unite both.
290
00:13:36,590 --> 00:13:37,830
Do you understand what I'm talking about?
291
00:13:38,110 --> 00:13:38,210
Okay?
292
00:13:38,590 --> 00:13:42,570
Of course, if we started to see in
293
00:13:42,570 --> 00:13:45,350
the location that we were, what photo we
294
00:13:45,350 --> 00:13:48,410
took with Yasmina and Diego, okay, the background
295
00:13:48,410 --> 00:13:51,410
is the same, obvious, but the philosophy, the
296
00:13:51,410 --> 00:13:55,870
way of shooting, the meaning of the photo,
297
00:13:56,130 --> 00:13:58,250
the language, I mean, it is completely different
298
00:13:58,250 --> 00:13:59,130
from each other.
299
00:13:59,250 --> 00:14:02,590
A photograph is much more static and the
300
00:14:02,590 --> 00:14:04,550
other has much more movement.
301
00:14:05,290 --> 00:14:08,530
Honestly, of course, I don't want to compare
302
00:14:08,530 --> 00:14:08,990
them, right?
303
00:14:09,170 --> 00:14:09,930
Which would be better?
304
00:14:10,070 --> 00:14:12,770
Because I really like both, both, and I
305
00:14:12,770 --> 00:14:15,010
feel attracted to both, both the one with
306
00:14:15,010 --> 00:14:16,090
the hat and the other.
307
00:14:16,470 --> 00:14:19,230
But I want you to see how, depending
308
00:14:19,230 --> 00:14:21,630
on the couple's energy, that is, depending on
309
00:14:21,630 --> 00:14:24,150
how they go dressed, we can alter, we
310
00:14:24,150 --> 00:14:27,970
can combine things and we can achieve completely
311
00:14:27,970 --> 00:14:28,970
different results, right?
312
00:14:29,330 --> 00:14:32,070
We were, remember, at this point in which
313
00:14:32,070 --> 00:14:34,810
Yasmina, for example, was showing me the ring,
314
00:14:34,930 --> 00:14:35,030
right?
315
00:14:35,750 --> 00:14:37,750
I would like to show you what I
316
00:14:37,750 --> 00:14:41,430
did also with Luisfer and Insonio, okay?
317
00:14:41,970 --> 00:14:46,010
Notice that, I mean, I completely changed the
318
00:14:46,010 --> 00:14:48,510
record and now I did lean on the
319
00:14:48,510 --> 00:14:49,450
tilt-shift, okay?
320
00:14:49,670 --> 00:14:51,670
In which to remember that it is macro
321
00:14:51,670 --> 00:14:53,230
and I did bring it as close as
322
00:14:53,230 --> 00:14:56,730
possible to the peculiarity of the tilt-shift
323
00:14:56,730 --> 00:14:58,670
or the 45mm, which you already know that
324
00:14:58,670 --> 00:15:03,850
I use it even to eat, the peculiarity
325
00:15:03,850 --> 00:15:05,910
that it has is that you can put
326
00:15:05,910 --> 00:15:09,030
it in a 34mm diaphragm, 34mm, yes, and
327
00:15:09,030 --> 00:15:11,410
when you bring it so much, what you
328
00:15:11,410 --> 00:15:14,310
can do sometimes is that it seems that
329
00:15:14,310 --> 00:15:17,550
the foreground is focused, as is the hand
330
00:15:17,550 --> 00:15:20,210
with the ring, and the background, which is
331
00:15:20,210 --> 00:15:23,850
Sonia's, is also, for example, focused.
332
00:15:24,370 --> 00:15:26,170
And what I wanted to do is that,
333
00:15:26,170 --> 00:15:30,410
I mean, Sonia was perfectly fitted in that
334
00:15:30,410 --> 00:15:30,790
ring.
335
00:15:30,910 --> 00:15:34,390
Also, an important point, Sonia was wearing a
336
00:15:34,390 --> 00:15:36,310
kind of black jacket, skirt.
337
00:15:37,830 --> 00:15:40,250
The background in which we are working is
338
00:15:40,250 --> 00:15:41,710
a black background.
339
00:15:42,230 --> 00:15:46,610
If we join black with black, everything is
340
00:15:46,610 --> 00:15:48,350
diluted, it does not work.
341
00:15:48,970 --> 00:15:52,530
That's where I came from, sorry, that I
342
00:15:52,530 --> 00:15:54,690
told Sonia, hey, I'm going to ask you,
343
00:15:54,810 --> 00:15:56,990
even if it's a little cold, because remember
344
00:15:56,990 --> 00:15:59,630
that the session was done in February in
345
00:15:59,630 --> 00:16:03,410
Spain, in Spain in February it is totally
346
00:16:03,410 --> 00:16:04,250
winter, okay?
347
00:16:04,470 --> 00:16:06,830
And I told Sonia, look, I'm going to
348
00:16:06,830 --> 00:16:08,390
ask you, please, to take off your skirt
349
00:16:08,390 --> 00:16:10,990
and to put on only with your, I
350
00:16:10,990 --> 00:16:12,010
mean, with your white shirt.
351
00:16:12,770 --> 00:16:16,650
The white with the black works great and
352
00:16:16,650 --> 00:16:18,630
that's why it makes the girl stand out,
353
00:16:18,770 --> 00:16:18,870
right?
354
00:16:18,890 --> 00:16:21,010
That it stands out a lot and works
355
00:16:21,010 --> 00:16:22,510
well, okay?
356
00:16:23,070 --> 00:16:25,730
I want to finish this first video here,
357
00:16:25,770 --> 00:16:28,030
but I want you to stay with this
358
00:16:28,030 --> 00:16:28,490
photograph.
359
00:16:29,250 --> 00:16:32,490
Not only with what we are seeing of
360
00:16:32,490 --> 00:16:34,430
a ring, with a hand, with the girl,
361
00:16:34,550 --> 00:16:36,690
but the place in which it was done,
362
00:16:36,770 --> 00:16:38,790
because in the next video I am going
363
00:16:38,790 --> 00:16:42,550
to start talking directly about the place and
364
00:16:42,550 --> 00:16:45,750
the photographs that I got with a couple
365
00:16:45,750 --> 00:16:48,630
and the photographs that I took later with
366
00:16:48,630 --> 00:16:48,990
another one, okay?
367
00:16:49,870 --> 00:16:52,170
So nothing else and we leave it here,
368
00:16:52,330 --> 00:16:53,710
attentive with the second part, friends.
26712
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.