Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,460 --> 00:00:03,440
Friends, welcome to the first video of the
2
00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:03,600
year.
3
00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:05,760
We hope, as always, that everything goes as
4
00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:06,340
well as possible.
5
00:00:06,920 --> 00:00:09,180
We hope that if any of you have
6
00:00:09,180 --> 00:00:11,260
been in these last few days with some
7
00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:15,340
symptoms related to the famous COVID, you are
8
00:00:15,340 --> 00:00:15,760
recovering.
9
00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:20,320
We are already up to the balls in
10
00:00:20,320 --> 00:00:24,960
this situation, so my most positive energy for
11
00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:25,540
all of you.
12
00:00:25,540 --> 00:00:27,980
In today's video, in the first of the
13
00:00:27,980 --> 00:00:30,040
year, I don't want to give lessons or
14
00:00:30,040 --> 00:00:32,100
anything like that, I just want to share
15
00:00:32,100 --> 00:00:37,100
with you a little something that crossed my
16
00:00:37,100 --> 00:00:39,400
mind and that I shared with Erika and
17
00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:42,580
I started looking at the profile of many
18
00:00:42,580 --> 00:00:44,380
Instagram colleagues to see what they were doing,
19
00:00:44,500 --> 00:00:47,260
to see what they stopped doing and in
20
00:00:47,260 --> 00:00:50,220
the end I did not solve the problem
21
00:00:50,220 --> 00:00:50,960
that I had.
22
00:00:51,160 --> 00:00:52,020
What was the problem?
23
00:00:52,740 --> 00:00:55,700
Very simple, put a frame or not put
24
00:00:55,700 --> 00:00:57,700
a frame in my Instagram photos.
25
00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:00,060
So simple and so complicated at the same
26
00:01:00,060 --> 00:01:00,800
time as that, right?
27
00:01:01,220 --> 00:01:02,080
Why do I say that?
28
00:01:02,260 --> 00:01:06,480
Because throughout all this time, if I say
29
00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:08,840
all this time, I mean throughout the last
30
00:01:08,840 --> 00:01:10,580
few months or even a couple of years
31
00:01:10,580 --> 00:01:12,860
ago, I have been in contact with a
32
00:01:12,860 --> 00:01:15,380
multitude of colleagues, some of them very good
33
00:01:15,380 --> 00:01:20,360
in everything related to Instagram and many of
34
00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:23,440
them came to me to say why I
35
00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:26,240
was still keeping the frame in my Instagram
36
00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:26,340
photos.
37
00:01:26,760 --> 00:01:29,260
The story is that I told them why
38
00:01:29,260 --> 00:01:35,120
not and their answer was because without a
39
00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:40,800
frame you get more engaged with future clients
40
00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:42,000
or future partners.
41
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:46,540
I always told them that for me, ok,
42
00:01:46,760 --> 00:01:48,880
they may be right, I was not doing
43
00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:50,480
badly with the frame either.
44
00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:52,500
In fact, I have always done quite well
45
00:01:52,500 --> 00:01:54,680
in what is engaged or in what is
46
00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:57,100
followers or likes or all those things as
47
00:01:57,100 --> 00:01:58,040
we want to understand them.
48
00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:02,720
Of course, my friends or people who are
49
00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:05,520
a bit in the sector of Instagram recognized
50
00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:09,880
that I was not doing badly, but I
51
00:02:09,880 --> 00:02:13,400
would do better if I did not include
52
00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:13,760
a frame.
53
00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:17,240
The story is that if I have not
54
00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:19,160
placed the frame, if I have not done
55
00:02:19,160 --> 00:02:21,560
it until now, it is because I have
56
00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:24,620
always thought that I am a photographer with
57
00:02:24,620 --> 00:02:25,200
a work.
58
00:02:26,040 --> 00:02:29,700
I mean, I would like my photos not
59
00:02:29,700 --> 00:02:33,440
to be simple photos, I mean, photos only
60
00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:37,220
created for Instagram or only created to have
61
00:02:37,220 --> 00:02:41,360
a mere commercial fruit with a future partner.
62
00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:46,000
I mean, it is obvious that my photos
63
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:49,120
are created to get an engage and get
64
00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:51,220
my clients or future clients to keep going.
65
00:02:52,060 --> 00:02:56,660
But I, that of seeing in my interface
66
00:02:56,660 --> 00:02:58,480
or as we want to call it feed,
67
00:02:59,620 --> 00:03:03,300
all square photos, it does not end up
68
00:03:03,300 --> 00:03:03,680
working for me.
69
00:03:03,820 --> 00:03:04,700
But why mainly?
70
00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:10,500
Because the weight of my images sometimes falls
71
00:03:10,500 --> 00:03:14,020
in the center, but many more on the
72
00:03:14,020 --> 00:03:15,500
sides, at the ends.
73
00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:19,320
Therefore, if I do not put a frame,
74
00:03:19,980 --> 00:03:22,000
if I do not use a frame, then
75
00:03:22,000 --> 00:03:22,460
what happens?
76
00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:26,300
That there are photos that are totally dead,
77
00:03:26,460 --> 00:03:30,280
I mean, dead that have no content, that
78
00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:31,500
have no meaning.
79
00:03:31,920 --> 00:03:35,600
And all this came because a couple of
80
00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:37,940
weeks ago I was about to publish this
81
00:03:37,940 --> 00:03:38,500
publication.
82
00:03:38,500 --> 00:03:42,420
This was the first photo and of course,
83
00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:45,780
the weight of the image is completely on
84
00:03:45,780 --> 00:03:47,420
the left, which is where the guys are.
85
00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:52,260
And then I thought, damn, and then what
86
00:03:52,260 --> 00:03:52,640
do I do, right?
87
00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:56,460
Of course, and then I started looking at
88
00:03:56,460 --> 00:03:58,980
the great photographers that I follow.
89
00:03:59,960 --> 00:04:03,460
And I started first thinking, let's see, let's
90
00:04:03,460 --> 00:04:06,100
start with Mario Testino, let's see what Mario
91
00:04:06,100 --> 00:04:06,540
Testino does.
92
00:04:06,540 --> 00:04:09,860
And Mario Testino surprised me, because he has
93
00:04:09,860 --> 00:04:11,460
a bit of a collage, well, not a
94
00:04:11,460 --> 00:04:12,980
collage, but he has a bit of everything,
95
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:13,180
right?
96
00:04:13,720 --> 00:04:15,519
It has frames, it has some photos without
97
00:04:15,519 --> 00:04:17,560
frames, it has videos, it has stories, and
98
00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:22,740
well, it's not that I got rid of
99
00:04:22,740 --> 00:04:23,500
my doubts, right?
100
00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:25,740
So it occurred to me to think, well,
101
00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:28,280
let's go for James Natchewy.
102
00:04:28,280 --> 00:04:32,460
And James Natchewy broke me in half, I
103
00:04:32,460 --> 00:04:34,100
mean, he broke me in half when I
104
00:04:34,100 --> 00:04:37,160
saw that, yes, he uses frames, but they
105
00:04:37,160 --> 00:04:37,440
are black.
106
00:04:37,600 --> 00:04:39,240
How many times have I told you here,
107
00:04:39,380 --> 00:04:41,840
any of you, that black frames don't work?
108
00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:46,060
Well, James Natchewy uses frames and they are
109
00:04:46,060 --> 00:04:46,760
black, okay?
110
00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:51,140
So, right away I thought, I'm going to
111
00:04:51,140 --> 00:04:53,240
look at Fer Juaristi, let's see what Fer
112
00:04:53,240 --> 00:04:53,340
does.
113
00:04:53,340 --> 00:04:56,940
Well, Fer doesn't use frames, so what the
114
00:04:56,940 --> 00:04:57,440
hell do I do?
115
00:04:58,380 --> 00:05:00,040
Because for me Fer is a reference.
116
00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:03,440
So I went to take a look, for
117
00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:07,260
example, at the Crisman, and Crisman Studios doesn't
118
00:05:07,260 --> 00:05:08,220
use frames either.
119
00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:11,360
And then it occurred to me to think,
120
00:05:11,560 --> 00:05:16,300
I'm going to go through Wallpress Photo, let's
121
00:05:16,300 --> 00:05:17,200
see what they do, right?
122
00:05:17,220 --> 00:05:18,840
Because they are people who care so much
123
00:05:18,840 --> 00:05:21,000
about aesthetics, like everyone I've mentioned so far.
124
00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:24,620
And they don't use frames, I say, wow,
125
00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:25,060
holy shit.
126
00:05:25,740 --> 00:05:28,800
I go to a Spanish photographer, whom I
127
00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:32,340
always have in very good esteem, who is
128
00:05:32,340 --> 00:05:34,120
Marco Rojo, or Víctor de Marco Rojo in
129
00:05:34,120 --> 00:05:35,860
this case, and I see that he does
130
00:05:35,860 --> 00:05:36,700
use frames.
131
00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:40,940
The bitch, I say, then what the hell,
132
00:05:41,100 --> 00:05:42,560
so I pick up the phone and I
133
00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:43,180
call Víctor.
134
00:05:43,540 --> 00:05:45,640
I say, Víctor, I have this doubt, this
135
00:05:45,640 --> 00:05:46,080
question.
136
00:05:46,500 --> 00:05:47,720
I say, what do I do?
137
00:05:48,480 --> 00:05:49,800
Frames or no frames?
138
00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:53,400
And he tells me, I don't know.
139
00:05:54,080 --> 00:05:57,300
I, frames, help me so that when the
140
00:05:57,300 --> 00:05:59,400
client sees the entire interface or the entire
141
00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:02,780
feed, he sees your works as if they
142
00:06:02,780 --> 00:06:04,420
were in a passepartout, as if it were
143
00:06:04,420 --> 00:06:07,440
almost like an exhibition, right?
144
00:06:07,840 --> 00:06:10,180
And I told him, of course, I think
145
00:06:10,180 --> 00:06:14,880
we are exhibiting part of our work on
146
00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:17,600
a social network, which today is called Instagram,
147
00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:18,780
we don't know what will happen.
148
00:06:19,740 --> 00:06:21,620
But of course, on the other side of
149
00:06:21,620 --> 00:06:24,760
the scale, I have the other conversation I
150
00:06:24,760 --> 00:06:27,420
had, for example, with Pablo Laguía, in which
151
00:06:27,420 --> 00:06:29,180
he told me, no, Víctor, if you now
152
00:06:29,180 --> 00:06:34,880
have Engage without frame, you will still follow
153
00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:37,100
it more, that is, having more still.
154
00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:40,520
And it's twice as clean, and Instagram is
155
00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:45,740
going to position you, or it's going to
156
00:06:45,740 --> 00:06:48,120
favor you if you don't use a frame,
157
00:06:48,380 --> 00:06:50,860
because you have to know it, Instagram favors
158
00:06:50,860 --> 00:06:51,900
those of us who don't have a frame,
159
00:06:52,100 --> 00:06:53,420
that's clear, okay?
160
00:06:53,820 --> 00:06:55,300
And then, if we want to put a
161
00:06:55,300 --> 00:06:56,340
frame on it, that's up to each one.
162
00:06:56,660 --> 00:06:58,780
May it go well for those of us
163
00:06:58,780 --> 00:07:00,220
who don't have a frame, those of us
164
00:07:00,220 --> 00:07:02,340
who put a frame, like Víctor de Marco
165
00:07:02,340 --> 00:07:06,360
Rojo, or me, or whoever, I was going
166
00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:08,400
to say fate, but I don't want to
167
00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:09,740
compare myself with Mario Testino, okay?
168
00:07:10,840 --> 00:07:15,200
But I mean, it's up to each one,
169
00:07:15,220 --> 00:07:15,360
right?
170
00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:17,460
What is the weight for you?
171
00:07:19,480 --> 00:07:22,500
The Engage with your future clients, or the
172
00:07:22,500 --> 00:07:24,600
presentation of your work?
173
00:07:26,060 --> 00:07:26,860
What does this mean?
174
00:07:27,500 --> 00:07:28,660
That I'm not going to change my mind?
175
00:07:28,660 --> 00:07:30,100
No, no, no, no, no, no.
176
00:07:30,100 --> 00:07:30,680
What does this mean?
177
00:07:30,980 --> 00:07:31,760
That I'm wrong?
178
00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:34,480
More than sure, like in almost everything in
179
00:07:34,480 --> 00:07:35,040
this life, right?
180
00:07:35,100 --> 00:07:36,400
Because I don't usually...
181
00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:39,440
Sorry, I usually make mistakes almost always, so
182
00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:42,180
in this case, don't follow me, or don't
183
00:07:42,180 --> 00:07:44,720
listen to me at all, because I'm talking
184
00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:48,460
to talk, to share with you what went
185
00:07:48,460 --> 00:07:49,040
through my head.
186
00:07:49,220 --> 00:07:51,220
I mean, I don't have...
187
00:07:51,220 --> 00:07:53,680
I mean, there is no study behind that
188
00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:55,840
guarantees that having a frame in your photos
189
00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:57,960
on Instagram is going to help you position
190
00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:00,200
yourself, and there is a study in which
191
00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:02,560
having a frame in your photos works better.
192
00:08:02,780 --> 00:08:04,840
I mean, they're more viral, ultimately.
193
00:08:06,140 --> 00:08:07,520
Therefore, that's where I am now.
194
00:08:08,140 --> 00:08:09,660
I don't know if I'm making a mistake.
195
00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:11,140
At the moment, as I've already told you,
196
00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:13,140
I'm not going to change, but I assure
197
00:08:13,140 --> 00:08:15,000
you that the other day, if it wasn't
198
00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:17,920
for this photo in which the weight was
199
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:19,520
on the left, I assure you that I
200
00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:21,940
would have started to change, and make the
201
00:08:21,940 --> 00:08:23,560
format, I mean, even if in the feed
202
00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:26,120
it appears in a square format, it's still
203
00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:27,400
the feed, it's also true.
204
00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:29,080
The first one, I mean, the photo when
205
00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:30,360
you publish it doesn't look square.
206
00:08:32,950 --> 00:08:34,730
As you can see, I still have the
207
00:08:34,730 --> 00:08:35,309
same doubts.
208
00:08:35,510 --> 00:08:37,289
Maybe in the future weeks I'll change.
209
00:08:38,450 --> 00:08:39,230
I don't know.
210
00:08:39,350 --> 00:08:40,710
Not at the moment, but maybe I will,
211
00:08:41,049 --> 00:08:41,730
or maybe I won't.
212
00:08:42,950 --> 00:08:46,250
I feel that this video is so obscene
213
00:08:46,250 --> 00:08:47,910
and so unclear.
214
00:08:49,430 --> 00:08:51,150
I'm sorry, guys and girls.
215
00:08:51,970 --> 00:08:52,690
So, that's all.
216
00:08:52,970 --> 00:08:53,390
That's all.
217
00:08:54,190 --> 00:08:55,090
This was the video.
218
00:08:55,090 --> 00:08:57,270
I don't know if any of you, or
219
00:08:57,270 --> 00:08:59,090
if I've made you doubt, is going to
220
00:08:59,090 --> 00:09:01,330
change all this, or it's going to stay
221
00:09:01,330 --> 00:09:02,510
as it was, or it's going to change.
222
00:09:03,790 --> 00:09:05,290
So, tell me what you want.
223
00:09:05,430 --> 00:09:06,430
And if you want to criticize me, you
224
00:09:06,430 --> 00:09:06,970
can do it too.
225
00:09:07,430 --> 00:09:09,410
So, welcome to the first video of the
226
00:09:09,410 --> 00:09:09,550
year.
227
00:09:09,930 --> 00:09:10,830
A great year is waiting for you on
228
00:09:10,830 --> 00:09:11,410
Patreon, guys.
229
00:09:11,870 --> 00:09:12,150
Take care.
15478
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.