Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:02,700 --> 00:00:03,980
Hello friends, how are you?
2
00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:04,840
How are things going?
3
00:00:04,960 --> 00:00:06,180
Welcome to a new episode.
4
00:00:06,460 --> 00:00:08,060
As always, I want to send you all
5
00:00:08,060 --> 00:00:09,140
all the positive energy.
6
00:00:09,760 --> 00:00:11,260
In today's video I want to share with
7
00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:13,840
you a very, very short tip, but surely
8
00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:15,300
very effective, okay?
9
00:00:15,700 --> 00:00:16,840
So I promise you that I'm going to
10
00:00:16,840 --> 00:00:18,240
steal you a little time.
11
00:00:18,740 --> 00:00:21,480
And all this comes because I've been receiving
12
00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:23,400
for a couple of weeks more than one
13
00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:26,540
email in which you ask me what is
14
00:00:26,540 --> 00:00:30,240
the maximum ISO that I usually use and
15
00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:31,420
all these things.
16
00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:33,420
In addition, it coincides with the fact that
17
00:00:33,420 --> 00:00:35,380
recently we had a one-to-one course
18
00:00:35,380 --> 00:00:37,220
in which a kid from Panama came here
19
00:00:37,220 --> 00:00:41,680
and I realized that he also had those
20
00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:44,940
doubts and, in fact, he is not the
21
00:00:44,940 --> 00:00:46,600
first person to ask me about it in
22
00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:48,300
the last few months.
23
00:00:48,300 --> 00:00:50,940
So I thought, well, I think it will
24
00:00:50,940 --> 00:00:54,840
be interesting to share this with you, right?
25
00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:58,220
And it is that last week, oh sorry,
26
00:00:58,420 --> 00:01:00,460
last week, in one of the previous videos
27
00:01:00,460 --> 00:01:04,280
I already commented something like that, a piece
28
00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:06,380
of the phrase in which, if I'm not
29
00:01:06,380 --> 00:01:08,600
mistaken, I think it was made by Kappa
30
00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:11,240
or Ansel Adams, now I have my doubts,
31
00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:13,040
but it was something like that, there is
32
00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:15,320
nothing worse than a clear image of a
33
00:01:15,320 --> 00:01:16,120
blurry concept.
34
00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:17,460
What do I mean by this?
35
00:01:17,940 --> 00:01:20,160
It is very easy, in quotes, to take
36
00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:23,480
images with good brightness or with interesting light
37
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:27,880
conditions, as it could be during the day,
38
00:01:27,960 --> 00:01:28,060
right?
39
00:01:28,060 --> 00:01:30,180
In which the ISO can be adjusted to
40
00:01:30,180 --> 00:01:33,240
100 ISO quietly or to a very low
41
00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:33,340
value.
42
00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:35,820
We can adjust the camera levels in a
43
00:01:35,820 --> 00:01:37,720
perfect way and it is super simple, in
44
00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:38,880
quotes, to shoot, right?
45
00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:40,920
But of course, what happens when we are
46
00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:46,560
working under very complicated light conditions in indoor
47
00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:49,480
places, at night parties, what happens, right?
48
00:01:49,940 --> 00:01:51,320
What I want to get to, and I'm
49
00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:53,120
going to finish quickly with all this, is
50
00:01:53,120 --> 00:01:55,360
that gentlemen, the cameras that we have are
51
00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:59,640
already prepared to work with really incredible ISOs,
52
00:01:59,920 --> 00:02:00,260
okay?
53
00:02:02,320 --> 00:02:04,340
Therefore, it does not hurt you if at
54
00:02:04,340 --> 00:02:05,960
some point you have to go up to
55
00:02:05,960 --> 00:02:06,840
8000 ISO.
56
00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:10,340
Be careful, everyone knows that I am always
57
00:02:10,340 --> 00:02:12,540
in favor of working with the lowest possible
58
00:02:12,540 --> 00:02:15,080
ISO and in fact, in a church with
59
00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:17,260
very little light, or at a party with
60
00:02:17,260 --> 00:02:18,620
very little light, I do not like to
61
00:02:18,620 --> 00:02:20,020
go over 4500 ISO.
62
00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:22,660
But if at any given moment I am
63
00:02:22,660 --> 00:02:24,900
in a small hermitage, I am in a
64
00:02:24,900 --> 00:02:28,840
place that to take that photo forward, that
65
00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:31,200
is, to be able to photograph it correctly,
66
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:33,120
more or less, I have to raise the
67
00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:35,720
ISO as far as necessary, I'm going to
68
00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:36,180
do it.
69
00:02:36,420 --> 00:02:40,660
And let's see, have something very clear, where
70
00:02:40,660 --> 00:02:45,020
is that shot going to be exposed?
71
00:02:46,300 --> 00:02:47,860
Let's say 10,000 ISO.
72
00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:50,100
Do you think it will be exposed in
73
00:02:50,100 --> 00:02:50,560
the MOMA?
74
00:02:51,300 --> 00:02:52,860
Maybe in the future, who knows?
75
00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:56,180
But do you remember the photos, or do
76
00:02:56,180 --> 00:02:59,540
you remember the photos of the landing in
77
00:02:59,540 --> 00:03:02,640
Normandy, in the Second World War, the films
78
00:03:02,640 --> 00:03:04,220
that were negative and on top of that
79
00:03:04,220 --> 00:03:04,740
they were forced?
80
00:03:05,180 --> 00:03:06,720
And they are works of art, that is,
81
00:03:06,900 --> 00:03:10,120
those photographers, all masterful, or the vast majority,
82
00:03:10,980 --> 00:03:12,600
forced the film, for what?
83
00:03:12,900 --> 00:03:16,320
To be able to take a graphic document
84
00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:16,580
forward.
85
00:03:16,980 --> 00:03:18,540
We, the same, I do not want to
86
00:03:18,540 --> 00:03:20,560
compare the wedding photograph with the day of
87
00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:21,440
the landing, okay?
88
00:03:21,820 --> 00:03:23,500
But that's what I want to get to,
89
00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:23,720
okay?
90
00:03:23,720 --> 00:03:26,100
And I do not neglect, as I say,
91
00:03:26,180 --> 00:03:28,280
to upload or do whatever is necessary to
92
00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:29,060
get ahead.
93
00:03:29,460 --> 00:03:32,360
And remember, it is more than likely that
94
00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:35,000
that photograph ends up printed on an album,
95
00:03:35,140 --> 00:03:37,480
at most, size like this, that is, 20
96
00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:40,780
-30, or on an Instagram that is going
97
00:03:40,780 --> 00:03:41,220
to be small.
98
00:03:41,900 --> 00:03:45,740
Although you give a couple a photo at
99
00:03:45,740 --> 00:03:48,260
8,000 ISO, do you think it will
100
00:03:48,260 --> 00:03:49,220
increase it?
101
00:03:49,220 --> 00:03:52,080
And he's going to tell you, hey guys,
102
00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:53,580
this is at 8,000 ISO.
103
00:03:53,900 --> 00:03:57,780
No, fuck, let's be a little spooked for
104
00:03:57,780 --> 00:03:58,320
this, right?
105
00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:00,140
I already tell you that, as you know,
106
00:04:00,500 --> 00:04:02,340
I am not a supporter, or it is
107
00:04:02,340 --> 00:04:03,940
not very common in my case, that we
108
00:04:03,940 --> 00:04:05,840
upload neither Erika nor I of 4,000
109
00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:06,760
and 5,000 ISO, okay?
110
00:04:06,820 --> 00:04:09,100
But having said that, I should clarify it.
111
00:04:09,260 --> 00:04:14,200
Then, to settle all this very clearly, I'm
112
00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:15,540
going to show you a few images.
113
00:04:15,540 --> 00:04:18,800
They are one of my best images, all
114
00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:21,380
of them, all of them, or they are
115
00:04:21,380 --> 00:04:23,720
moved, or they are out of focus, or
116
00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:24,680
they are trepidated.
117
00:04:24,840 --> 00:04:27,080
But, as I said at the beginning, the
118
00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:28,300
pithy phrase.
119
00:04:28,900 --> 00:04:31,360
There is nothing worse than a clear image
120
00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:32,740
of a blurry concept.
121
00:04:33,180 --> 00:04:33,580
Do you understand?
122
00:04:33,780 --> 00:04:38,040
I mean, it does not matter that the
123
00:04:38,040 --> 00:04:40,520
image is a little out of focus if
124
00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:41,580
the concept is brutal.
125
00:04:41,860 --> 00:04:42,300
Come on?
126
00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:43,380
Yes?
127
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:43,820
Is it clear?
128
00:04:43,820 --> 00:04:47,400
I'm going to show you this first image
129
00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:49,100
so you can take a look at it,
130
00:04:49,100 --> 00:04:49,200
for example.
131
00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:51,620
As you can see, I want it to
132
00:04:51,620 --> 00:04:51,940
be ...
133
00:04:51,940 --> 00:04:54,280
Well, if we get closer, as you can
134
00:04:54,280 --> 00:04:55,960
see, the groom's hand is moved, right?
135
00:04:56,220 --> 00:04:58,460
And look, it had an interesting light condition,
136
00:04:58,460 --> 00:04:59,880
but I do not care if it is
137
00:04:59,880 --> 00:05:00,140
moved.
138
00:05:00,500 --> 00:05:02,000
The important thing is the concept, right?
139
00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:04,200
The important thing is the image itself, how
140
00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:06,520
it really works, okay?
141
00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:10,680
Let's go for another image, completely out of
142
00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:11,100
focus.
143
00:05:11,100 --> 00:05:13,040
Well, not completely out of focus, but a
144
00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:13,800
little out of focus.
145
00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:17,060
Gentlemen, it is one of my favorite images.
146
00:05:17,480 --> 00:05:19,820
I do not care if the bride's face
147
00:05:19,820 --> 00:05:24,060
is not perfectly focused or all this.
148
00:05:24,400 --> 00:05:25,800
The important thing was the moment.
149
00:05:25,920 --> 00:05:27,780
I was inside a church with very little
150
00:05:27,780 --> 00:05:30,660
light, but I thought that even if it
151
00:05:30,660 --> 00:05:32,680
was out of focus, it was a good
152
00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:33,320
photo for me.
153
00:05:33,860 --> 00:05:37,120
And take a look at the groom's feet.
154
00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:38,700
They are mutilated, that is a very big
155
00:05:38,700 --> 00:05:39,300
mistake for me.
156
00:05:39,300 --> 00:05:45,600
But for me, the moment as such or
157
00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:49,740
the meaning of the mere image is more
158
00:05:49,740 --> 00:05:51,100
important than technical aspects.
159
00:05:51,540 --> 00:05:53,420
But if we go for this pose, for
160
00:05:53,420 --> 00:05:55,600
example, it is not out of focus either,
161
00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:56,120
I mean.
162
00:05:56,700 --> 00:05:59,140
And look, the light conditions were not bad
163
00:05:59,140 --> 00:05:59,240
either.
164
00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:01,400
But I suppose that the nerves of the
165
00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:03,800
moment, the pressure of the moment, makes that,
166
00:06:03,900 --> 00:06:06,020
like every human being, the pulse trembles or
167
00:06:06,020 --> 00:06:07,380
the thing does not finish working.
168
00:06:07,380 --> 00:06:10,080
But nevertheless, if we go to this party
169
00:06:10,080 --> 00:06:12,580
photo in which I was possibly shooting, shooting
170
00:06:12,580 --> 00:06:14,820
at 4 or 5mm, the same thing happened.
171
00:06:15,300 --> 00:06:17,620
I suppose that, in addition to the movement,
172
00:06:17,840 --> 00:06:20,460
in addition to the little light that I
173
00:06:20,460 --> 00:06:23,380
had there, well, it does not finish being
174
00:06:23,380 --> 00:06:23,960
fully focused.
175
00:06:24,140 --> 00:06:26,960
And if we zoom in, for example, to
176
00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:29,380
the bride's face, you will see that the
177
00:06:29,380 --> 00:06:31,700
grain is quite severe, but nothing happens.
178
00:06:31,700 --> 00:06:34,900
As with one of the photos or my
179
00:06:34,900 --> 00:06:37,060
favorite photos throughout history.
180
00:06:38,340 --> 00:06:42,740
I have to admit, I mean, if we
181
00:06:42,740 --> 00:06:47,420
zoom in on the hands, they are also
182
00:06:47,420 --> 00:06:48,320
out of focus.
183
00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:50,660
But I do not worry.
184
00:06:51,220 --> 00:06:52,980
I mean, I had to shoot at a
185
00:06:52,980 --> 00:06:55,260
very, very low speed, I had to adjust
186
00:06:55,260 --> 00:06:56,320
the ISO very, very high.
187
00:06:56,420 --> 00:06:58,500
We were talking about a place where there
188
00:06:58,500 --> 00:06:59,480
was almost no light.
189
00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:01,160
Nothing happens, gentlemen.
190
00:07:01,580 --> 00:07:03,080
Like this one at the party.
191
00:07:03,820 --> 00:07:06,060
There was almost no light either and I
192
00:07:06,060 --> 00:07:06,860
had to manage it.
193
00:07:07,440 --> 00:07:09,680
I mean, this moment emerged almost out of
194
00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:14,180
nowhere, running, I had to get this forward
195
00:07:14,180 --> 00:07:15,660
as I could, even though I was able
196
00:07:15,660 --> 00:07:18,460
to bounce a flash, but the photo came
197
00:07:18,460 --> 00:07:18,780
out moving.
198
00:07:18,920 --> 00:07:19,540
Does it worry me?
199
00:07:20,280 --> 00:07:21,320
No, not at all.
200
00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:26,940
I think it clearly represents the intensity and
201
00:07:26,940 --> 00:07:29,220
the party of that moment.
202
00:07:29,620 --> 00:07:32,040
And let's go for the last image, one
203
00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:34,180
of my most iconic images.
204
00:07:34,900 --> 00:07:37,000
Let's bring the shot a little closer to
205
00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:39,700
the bride's hand or the bride's face.
206
00:07:40,700 --> 00:07:43,080
Believe me, when I saw it on the
207
00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:46,860
screen, I said, no, no, how can you
208
00:07:46,860 --> 00:07:47,600
focus this?
209
00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:48,080
But no!
210
00:07:50,500 --> 00:07:52,460
I'm a human being like all of you.
211
00:07:53,940 --> 00:07:57,200
Look, the conditions there were favorable.
212
00:07:57,500 --> 00:07:59,200
Although you see the black background, I mean,
213
00:07:59,380 --> 00:08:01,700
I was shooting at 100 ISO, the stream
214
00:08:01,700 --> 00:08:04,280
of natural light fell to death through that
215
00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:05,060
church door.
216
00:08:05,300 --> 00:08:08,540
I mean, everything was in my favor, but
217
00:08:08,540 --> 00:08:12,740
I had my coccyx broken, I had an
218
00:08:12,740 --> 00:08:15,800
incredible pain, the nerves of the moment, I
219
00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:17,540
had to crouch and I almost couldn't.
220
00:08:18,160 --> 00:08:20,660
Well, excuses like the ones of everyone.
221
00:08:20,920 --> 00:08:22,040
In the end, what did I do?
222
00:08:22,300 --> 00:08:23,180
De-focus a little.
223
00:08:24,660 --> 00:08:27,580
They are in my opening of the web
224
00:08:27,580 --> 00:08:28,600
along with the one of the hands.
225
00:08:29,440 --> 00:08:31,900
I mean, are they out of focus?
226
00:08:32,140 --> 00:08:32,340
Yes.
227
00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:34,640
Does it worry me at the moment?
228
00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:35,559
Yes.
229
00:08:36,740 --> 00:08:37,960
Does it worry me now?
230
00:08:38,460 --> 00:08:40,159
The only thing I think is, fuck, Víctor,
231
00:08:40,280 --> 00:08:41,280
you could have focused, right?
232
00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:42,880
So that the image was already round.
233
00:08:43,400 --> 00:08:44,900
But does it transmit what I want to
234
00:08:44,900 --> 00:08:45,220
transmit?
235
00:08:45,840 --> 00:08:46,280
Yes.
236
00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:47,500
It's over.
237
00:08:47,980 --> 00:08:48,840
Ok, it's clear.
238
00:08:49,980 --> 00:08:51,580
So I don't roll anymore.
239
00:08:51,740 --> 00:08:53,340
I said I wanted to make a short
240
00:08:53,340 --> 00:08:54,360
video, I don't know if I did it,
241
00:08:54,920 --> 00:08:57,260
but it seemed interesting to me to talk
242
00:08:57,260 --> 00:08:57,820
about that.
243
00:08:57,980 --> 00:08:59,800
And above all, how important it is to
244
00:08:59,800 --> 00:09:02,120
save the photo at any price.
245
00:09:02,780 --> 00:09:05,560
Regardless of whether the ISO is above, it
246
00:09:05,560 --> 00:09:06,840
is a little moved, it is a little
247
00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:11,380
out of focus, they are the photographers' mental
248
00:09:11,380 --> 00:09:12,800
straws, okay?
249
00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:15,520
So nothing else, friends, be good, take care,
250
00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:19,080
and keep hiring weddings.
251
00:09:19,680 --> 00:09:20,120
Assholes.
16624
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.