Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
0
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,580
1
00:00:00,580 --> 00:00:03,670
MICHAEL HEMANN: OK, let's look at another pedigree.
2
00:00:03,670 --> 00:00:06,790
3
00:00:06,790 --> 00:00:12,590
So what do we think is the pattern of inheritance here?
4
00:00:12,590 --> 00:00:16,500
Do we think it is dominant?
5
00:00:16,500 --> 00:00:21,450
Do we think it is recessive?
6
00:00:21,450 --> 00:00:24,690
Do we think it's X-linked recessive?
7
00:00:24,690 --> 00:00:26,910
Yeah, we're getting a couple answers, recessive.
8
00:00:26,910 --> 00:00:29,950
And that's, in fact, the case.
9
00:00:29,950 --> 00:00:33,420
And so there are really characteristics
10
00:00:33,420 --> 00:00:37,120
of recessive conditions.
11
00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:41,160
One of them is that you have affected children that
12
00:00:41,160 --> 00:00:42,660
don't have affected parents.
13
00:00:42,660 --> 00:00:46,050
So we saw that there was that ratio between affected parents
14
00:00:46,050 --> 00:00:48,930
and children in autosomal dominant conditions.
15
00:00:48,930 --> 00:00:53,100
We don't see that in these conditions.
16
00:00:53,100 --> 00:00:56,640
It's unlikely that this is a de novo new mutation because we
17
00:00:56,640 --> 00:01:02,770
see multiple individuals in this family that are affected.
18
00:01:02,770 --> 00:01:05,910
So we can sort of rule out the idea
19
00:01:05,910 --> 00:01:09,060
that these are just spontaneous new mutations because they're
20
00:01:09,060 --> 00:01:10,380
occurring frequently.
21
00:01:10,380 --> 00:01:12,490
They're not occurring in parents,
22
00:01:12,490 --> 00:01:16,380
so it suggests that maybe we're homozygousing alleles.
23
00:01:16,380 --> 00:01:21,690
And then really telltale signs of these conditions
24
00:01:21,690 --> 00:01:24,870
are shown here.
25
00:01:24,870 --> 00:01:28,140
26
00:01:28,140 --> 00:01:31,190
So these are consanguineous relationships, right?
27
00:01:31,190 --> 00:01:38,540
So basically they are mating between two family members.
28
00:01:38,540 --> 00:01:42,350
You know, so cousins or somewhat more distantly
29
00:01:42,350 --> 00:01:45,260
related, or possibly brother/sister.
30
00:01:45,260 --> 00:01:48,980
So these are characteristic of recessive conditions.
31
00:01:48,980 --> 00:01:51,770
And so we can think about how this actually occurs
32
00:01:51,770 --> 00:01:52,770
and why this occurs.
33
00:01:52,770 --> 00:01:56,540
OK, so if this is a recessive condition,
34
00:01:56,540 --> 00:01:59,210
then we imagine that the parents of all
35
00:01:59,210 --> 00:02:01,670
of the affected individuals are actually carriers.
36
00:02:01,670 --> 00:02:04,830
So we can fill in these dots here.
37
00:02:04,830 --> 00:02:06,750
Here's a carrier.
38
00:02:06,750 --> 00:02:08,190
Here's a carrier.
39
00:02:08,190 --> 00:02:09,620
Right?
40
00:02:09,620 --> 00:02:10,369
Here's a carrier.
41
00:02:10,369 --> 00:02:12,940
42
00:02:12,940 --> 00:02:14,860
Here's a carrier.
43
00:02:14,860 --> 00:02:23,270
And very likely in this family, this mother is a carrier
44
00:02:23,270 --> 00:02:29,300
and this father is a carrier.
45
00:02:29,300 --> 00:02:32,890
And this mother is a carrier.
46
00:02:32,890 --> 00:02:33,390
Right?
47
00:02:33,390 --> 00:02:39,510
And in this first generation, we have either the matriarch
48
00:02:39,510 --> 00:02:44,460
or patriarch here that is very likely a carrier.
49
00:02:44,460 --> 00:02:45,990
Right?
50
00:02:45,990 --> 00:02:48,960
And so consanguinity here is really
51
00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:51,780
important in the generation of this condition
52
00:02:51,780 --> 00:02:54,780
because it provides a strategy whereby example,
53
00:02:54,780 --> 00:02:58,650
or for example, a single allele that's
54
00:02:58,650 --> 00:03:04,890
present in this guy years ago can actually
55
00:03:04,890 --> 00:03:09,310
become a homozygous allele if you actually have inbreeding.
56
00:03:09,310 --> 00:03:09,810
Right?
57
00:03:09,810 --> 00:03:11,880
So this allele is passed on.
58
00:03:11,880 --> 00:03:14,430
And in most cases, that single allele
59
00:03:14,430 --> 00:03:17,520
would not actually lead to any phenotypic effect in a larger
60
00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:20,760
population, as it's segregating just as a single allele.
61
00:03:20,760 --> 00:03:24,600
But in a smaller family, that allele,
62
00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:28,410
if it is homozygoused through the interaction of people that
63
00:03:28,410 --> 00:03:31,560
now have this much higher allele frequency in the family,
64
00:03:31,560 --> 00:03:33,540
can lead to the appearance of a condition
65
00:03:33,540 --> 00:03:36,090
that typically you would not see.
66
00:03:36,090 --> 00:03:39,660
So again, this is really characteristic
67
00:03:39,660 --> 00:03:44,500
of recessive conditions.
68
00:03:44,500 --> 00:03:56,370
So for autosomal recessive conditions,
69
00:03:56,370 --> 00:03:57,480
we have a couple rules.
70
00:03:57,480 --> 00:04:09,270
And that is, if both parents are carriers,
71
00:04:09,270 --> 00:04:16,605
one quarter of the children are affected.
72
00:04:16,605 --> 00:04:20,920
73
00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:31,770
And when both parents are affected,
74
00:04:31,770 --> 00:04:32,955
all children are affected.
75
00:04:32,955 --> 00:04:39,630
76
00:04:39,630 --> 00:04:44,010
And finally, if the trait is very rare,
77
00:04:44,010 --> 00:04:48,270
then consanguinity is likely.
78
00:04:48,270 --> 00:05:03,000
79
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:05,700
Now, consanguinity doesn't always
80
00:05:05,700 --> 00:05:08,550
occur in recessive conditions.
81
00:05:08,550 --> 00:05:13,110
For example, here we're looking at a pedigree
82
00:05:13,110 --> 00:05:17,220
for the cystic fibrosis condition, which
83
00:05:17,220 --> 00:05:21,330
is a very serious respiratory condition characterized
84
00:05:21,330 --> 00:05:27,030
by chronic infections and, essentially, mucus accumulation
85
00:05:27,030 --> 00:05:28,780
in the lungs.
86
00:05:28,780 --> 00:05:32,520
It is characteristic of a number of populations,
87
00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:34,180
or endemic in a number of populations,
88
00:05:34,180 --> 00:05:35,910
including French Canadians, and here,
89
00:05:35,910 --> 00:05:37,840
Ashkenazi Jewish populations.
90
00:05:37,840 --> 00:05:40,200
This is actually one of the first conditions,
91
00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:42,210
along with Tay-Sachs condition, where
92
00:05:42,210 --> 00:05:44,310
there was genetic testing that was performed.
93
00:05:44,310 --> 00:05:48,810
And it was really prompted by a huge desire in the Ashkenazi
94
00:05:48,810 --> 00:05:52,740
Jewish population in New York to identify who is affected,
95
00:05:52,740 --> 00:05:56,040
who are carriers to try to give counseling
96
00:05:56,040 --> 00:05:57,990
and instruction to potential parents,
97
00:05:57,990 --> 00:06:03,450
potential partners to tell them, are you both carriers
98
00:06:03,450 --> 00:06:06,570
or do you want to consider being with somebody that's not
99
00:06:06,570 --> 00:06:12,060
a carrier so that you actually decrease the risk of having
100
00:06:12,060 --> 00:06:13,800
affected children.
101
00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:17,550
It is not, in this case, caused by inbreeding per se.
102
00:06:17,550 --> 00:06:20,010
It is caused very likely by a founder effect,
103
00:06:20,010 --> 00:06:22,050
having a small population of people
104
00:06:22,050 --> 00:06:26,310
in which these allele frequencies are really high.
105
00:06:26,310 --> 00:06:30,690
And so we'll talk about founder effects and allelic segregation
106
00:06:30,690 --> 00:06:36,430
with populations later in this class.
107
00:06:36,430 --> 00:06:39,480
This is an interesting biology.
108
00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:49,860
So of parents, so for documented carriers of cystic fibrosis, so
109
00:06:49,860 --> 00:06:53,640
if both parents are documented carriers,
110
00:06:53,640 --> 00:06:56,610
what would you expect the frequency
111
00:06:56,610 --> 00:07:00,450
of having a child having cystic fibrosis would be?
112
00:07:00,450 --> 00:07:04,380
113
00:07:04,380 --> 00:07:06,660
Both parents are carriers, right?
114
00:07:06,660 --> 00:07:12,800
So absolutely, you expect it's a quarter.
115
00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:16,110
It's actually a third.
116
00:07:16,110 --> 00:07:20,250
So one out of three children of documented,
117
00:07:20,250 --> 00:07:25,860
verified cystic fibrosis carriers,
118
00:07:25,860 --> 00:07:28,800
one third of the children are affected.
119
00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:32,240
Why is this the case?
120
00:07:32,240 --> 00:07:37,690
We have a CF child, right?
121
00:07:37,690 --> 00:07:40,930
So lots of people in the world that are carriers,
122
00:07:40,930 --> 00:07:45,640
or partners that are carriers for CF that have children that
123
00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:47,710
are unaffected three quarters of the time
124
00:07:47,710 --> 00:07:49,990
may never actually get genetic counseling.
125
00:07:49,990 --> 00:07:52,450
They may never go and see whether they're carriers.
126
00:07:52,450 --> 00:07:55,450
Only people that actually have kids that have a condition
127
00:07:55,450 --> 00:07:58,120
are going to be tested for carrier status.
128
00:07:58,120 --> 00:07:59,950
So those numbers are intrinsically
129
00:07:59,950 --> 00:08:03,580
going to be skewed, based just on human behavior.
130
00:08:03,580 --> 00:08:06,700
And this is something really to bear in mind when you're
131
00:08:06,700 --> 00:08:11,140
thinking about hypotheses and patterns of inheritance,
132
00:08:11,140 --> 00:08:13,840
that it involves science and it involves genetics,
133
00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:16,360
but it also involves human nature and the ability
134
00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:22,090
to assemble meaningful pedigrees to get accurate information
135
00:08:22,090 --> 00:08:23,880
from people.
9933
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.