All language subtitles for 37031x_MH_Inferring_Patterns_03_Autosomal_Rec_v1-en

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French Download
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,580 1 00:00:00,580 --> 00:00:03,670 MICHAEL HEMANN: OK, let's look at another pedigree. 2 00:00:03,670 --> 00:00:06,790 3 00:00:06,790 --> 00:00:12,590 So what do we think is the pattern of inheritance here? 4 00:00:12,590 --> 00:00:16,500 Do we think it is dominant? 5 00:00:16,500 --> 00:00:21,450 Do we think it is recessive? 6 00:00:21,450 --> 00:00:24,690 Do we think it's X-linked recessive? 7 00:00:24,690 --> 00:00:26,910 Yeah, we're getting a couple answers, recessive. 8 00:00:26,910 --> 00:00:29,950 And that's, in fact, the case. 9 00:00:29,950 --> 00:00:33,420 And so there are really characteristics 10 00:00:33,420 --> 00:00:37,120 of recessive conditions. 11 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:41,160 One of them is that you have affected children that 12 00:00:41,160 --> 00:00:42,660 don't have affected parents. 13 00:00:42,660 --> 00:00:46,050 So we saw that there was that ratio between affected parents 14 00:00:46,050 --> 00:00:48,930 and children in autosomal dominant conditions. 15 00:00:48,930 --> 00:00:53,100 We don't see that in these conditions. 16 00:00:53,100 --> 00:00:56,640 It's unlikely that this is a de novo new mutation because we 17 00:00:56,640 --> 00:01:02,770 see multiple individuals in this family that are affected. 18 00:01:02,770 --> 00:01:05,910 So we can sort of rule out the idea 19 00:01:05,910 --> 00:01:09,060 that these are just spontaneous new mutations because they're 20 00:01:09,060 --> 00:01:10,380 occurring frequently. 21 00:01:10,380 --> 00:01:12,490 They're not occurring in parents, 22 00:01:12,490 --> 00:01:16,380 so it suggests that maybe we're homozygousing alleles. 23 00:01:16,380 --> 00:01:21,690 And then really telltale signs of these conditions 24 00:01:21,690 --> 00:01:24,870 are shown here. 25 00:01:24,870 --> 00:01:28,140 26 00:01:28,140 --> 00:01:31,190 So these are consanguineous relationships, right? 27 00:01:31,190 --> 00:01:38,540 So basically they are mating between two family members. 28 00:01:38,540 --> 00:01:42,350 You know, so cousins or somewhat more distantly 29 00:01:42,350 --> 00:01:45,260 related, or possibly brother/sister. 30 00:01:45,260 --> 00:01:48,980 So these are characteristic of recessive conditions. 31 00:01:48,980 --> 00:01:51,770 And so we can think about how this actually occurs 32 00:01:51,770 --> 00:01:52,770 and why this occurs. 33 00:01:52,770 --> 00:01:56,540 OK, so if this is a recessive condition, 34 00:01:56,540 --> 00:01:59,210 then we imagine that the parents of all 35 00:01:59,210 --> 00:02:01,670 of the affected individuals are actually carriers. 36 00:02:01,670 --> 00:02:04,830 So we can fill in these dots here. 37 00:02:04,830 --> 00:02:06,750 Here's a carrier. 38 00:02:06,750 --> 00:02:08,190 Here's a carrier. 39 00:02:08,190 --> 00:02:09,620 Right? 40 00:02:09,620 --> 00:02:10,369 Here's a carrier. 41 00:02:10,369 --> 00:02:12,940 42 00:02:12,940 --> 00:02:14,860 Here's a carrier. 43 00:02:14,860 --> 00:02:23,270 And very likely in this family, this mother is a carrier 44 00:02:23,270 --> 00:02:29,300 and this father is a carrier. 45 00:02:29,300 --> 00:02:32,890 And this mother is a carrier. 46 00:02:32,890 --> 00:02:33,390 Right? 47 00:02:33,390 --> 00:02:39,510 And in this first generation, we have either the matriarch 48 00:02:39,510 --> 00:02:44,460 or patriarch here that is very likely a carrier. 49 00:02:44,460 --> 00:02:45,990 Right? 50 00:02:45,990 --> 00:02:48,960 And so consanguinity here is really 51 00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:51,780 important in the generation of this condition 52 00:02:51,780 --> 00:02:54,780 because it provides a strategy whereby example, 53 00:02:54,780 --> 00:02:58,650 or for example, a single allele that's 54 00:02:58,650 --> 00:03:04,890 present in this guy years ago can actually 55 00:03:04,890 --> 00:03:09,310 become a homozygous allele if you actually have inbreeding. 56 00:03:09,310 --> 00:03:09,810 Right? 57 00:03:09,810 --> 00:03:11,880 So this allele is passed on. 58 00:03:11,880 --> 00:03:14,430 And in most cases, that single allele 59 00:03:14,430 --> 00:03:17,520 would not actually lead to any phenotypic effect in a larger 60 00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:20,760 population, as it's segregating just as a single allele. 61 00:03:20,760 --> 00:03:24,600 But in a smaller family, that allele, 62 00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:28,410 if it is homozygoused through the interaction of people that 63 00:03:28,410 --> 00:03:31,560 now have this much higher allele frequency in the family, 64 00:03:31,560 --> 00:03:33,540 can lead to the appearance of a condition 65 00:03:33,540 --> 00:03:36,090 that typically you would not see. 66 00:03:36,090 --> 00:03:39,660 So again, this is really characteristic 67 00:03:39,660 --> 00:03:44,500 of recessive conditions. 68 00:03:44,500 --> 00:03:56,370 So for autosomal recessive conditions, 69 00:03:56,370 --> 00:03:57,480 we have a couple rules. 70 00:03:57,480 --> 00:04:09,270 And that is, if both parents are carriers, 71 00:04:09,270 --> 00:04:16,605 one quarter of the children are affected. 72 00:04:16,605 --> 00:04:20,920 73 00:04:20,920 --> 00:04:31,770 And when both parents are affected, 74 00:04:31,770 --> 00:04:32,955 all children are affected. 75 00:04:32,955 --> 00:04:39,630 76 00:04:39,630 --> 00:04:44,010 And finally, if the trait is very rare, 77 00:04:44,010 --> 00:04:48,270 then consanguinity is likely. 78 00:04:48,270 --> 00:05:03,000 79 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:05,700 Now, consanguinity doesn't always 80 00:05:05,700 --> 00:05:08,550 occur in recessive conditions. 81 00:05:08,550 --> 00:05:13,110 For example, here we're looking at a pedigree 82 00:05:13,110 --> 00:05:17,220 for the cystic fibrosis condition, which 83 00:05:17,220 --> 00:05:21,330 is a very serious respiratory condition characterized 84 00:05:21,330 --> 00:05:27,030 by chronic infections and, essentially, mucus accumulation 85 00:05:27,030 --> 00:05:28,780 in the lungs. 86 00:05:28,780 --> 00:05:32,520 It is characteristic of a number of populations, 87 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:34,180 or endemic in a number of populations, 88 00:05:34,180 --> 00:05:35,910 including French Canadians, and here, 89 00:05:35,910 --> 00:05:37,840 Ashkenazi Jewish populations. 90 00:05:37,840 --> 00:05:40,200 This is actually one of the first conditions, 91 00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:42,210 along with Tay-Sachs condition, where 92 00:05:42,210 --> 00:05:44,310 there was genetic testing that was performed. 93 00:05:44,310 --> 00:05:48,810 And it was really prompted by a huge desire in the Ashkenazi 94 00:05:48,810 --> 00:05:52,740 Jewish population in New York to identify who is affected, 95 00:05:52,740 --> 00:05:56,040 who are carriers to try to give counseling 96 00:05:56,040 --> 00:05:57,990 and instruction to potential parents, 97 00:05:57,990 --> 00:06:03,450 potential partners to tell them, are you both carriers 98 00:06:03,450 --> 00:06:06,570 or do you want to consider being with somebody that's not 99 00:06:06,570 --> 00:06:12,060 a carrier so that you actually decrease the risk of having 100 00:06:12,060 --> 00:06:13,800 affected children. 101 00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:17,550 It is not, in this case, caused by inbreeding per se. 102 00:06:17,550 --> 00:06:20,010 It is caused very likely by a founder effect, 103 00:06:20,010 --> 00:06:22,050 having a small population of people 104 00:06:22,050 --> 00:06:26,310 in which these allele frequencies are really high. 105 00:06:26,310 --> 00:06:30,690 And so we'll talk about founder effects and allelic segregation 106 00:06:30,690 --> 00:06:36,430 with populations later in this class. 107 00:06:36,430 --> 00:06:39,480 This is an interesting biology. 108 00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:49,860 So of parents, so for documented carriers of cystic fibrosis, so 109 00:06:49,860 --> 00:06:53,640 if both parents are documented carriers, 110 00:06:53,640 --> 00:06:56,610 what would you expect the frequency 111 00:06:56,610 --> 00:07:00,450 of having a child having cystic fibrosis would be? 112 00:07:00,450 --> 00:07:04,380 113 00:07:04,380 --> 00:07:06,660 Both parents are carriers, right? 114 00:07:06,660 --> 00:07:12,800 So absolutely, you expect it's a quarter. 115 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:16,110 It's actually a third. 116 00:07:16,110 --> 00:07:20,250 So one out of three children of documented, 117 00:07:20,250 --> 00:07:25,860 verified cystic fibrosis carriers, 118 00:07:25,860 --> 00:07:28,800 one third of the children are affected. 119 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:32,240 Why is this the case? 120 00:07:32,240 --> 00:07:37,690 We have a CF child, right? 121 00:07:37,690 --> 00:07:40,930 So lots of people in the world that are carriers, 122 00:07:40,930 --> 00:07:45,640 or partners that are carriers for CF that have children that 123 00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:47,710 are unaffected three quarters of the time 124 00:07:47,710 --> 00:07:49,990 may never actually get genetic counseling. 125 00:07:49,990 --> 00:07:52,450 They may never go and see whether they're carriers. 126 00:07:52,450 --> 00:07:55,450 Only people that actually have kids that have a condition 127 00:07:55,450 --> 00:07:58,120 are going to be tested for carrier status. 128 00:07:58,120 --> 00:07:59,950 So those numbers are intrinsically 129 00:07:59,950 --> 00:08:03,580 going to be skewed, based just on human behavior. 130 00:08:03,580 --> 00:08:06,700 And this is something really to bear in mind when you're 131 00:08:06,700 --> 00:08:11,140 thinking about hypotheses and patterns of inheritance, 132 00:08:11,140 --> 00:08:13,840 that it involves science and it involves genetics, 133 00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:16,360 but it also involves human nature and the ability 134 00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:22,090 to assemble meaningful pedigrees to get accurate information 135 00:08:22,090 --> 00:08:23,880 from people. 9933

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.