Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
0
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,790
1
00:00:00,790 --> 00:00:07,670
MICHAEL HEMANN: So let's look at a number of pedigrees.
2
00:00:07,670 --> 00:00:11,050
So here is a pedigree of a family that
3
00:00:11,050 --> 00:00:15,610
has brachydactyly polydactyly.
4
00:00:15,610 --> 00:00:18,160
In this case, you see actually the hand of one
5
00:00:18,160 --> 00:00:19,060
of these individuals.
6
00:00:19,060 --> 00:00:23,290
And they have five fingers and a thumb
7
00:00:23,290 --> 00:00:25,810
on that hand, which is unusual.
8
00:00:25,810 --> 00:00:29,380
9
00:00:29,380 --> 00:00:33,640
Not a devastating condition, but certainly an interesting one
10
00:00:33,640 --> 00:00:35,710
developmentally.
11
00:00:35,710 --> 00:00:38,920
And so we see a number of affected individuals
12
00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:40,850
and unaffected individuals.
13
00:00:40,850 --> 00:00:44,950
So just looking at this pedigree,
14
00:00:44,950 --> 00:00:48,580
what do we think the mode of inheritance is?
15
00:00:48,580 --> 00:00:52,040
16
00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:56,300
We've got some mixed answers, the majority of which
17
00:00:56,300 --> 00:01:00,350
suggest that this is dominant.
18
00:01:00,350 --> 00:01:05,269
And in fact, it is a dominant condition.
19
00:01:05,269 --> 00:01:07,880
And we'll talk about what that means
20
00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:11,450
to be dominant in a minute.
21
00:01:11,450 --> 00:01:13,520
But among other things, you actually
22
00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:18,330
see the appearance of this phenotype in every generation.
23
00:01:18,330 --> 00:01:23,030
So all of the generations here, we see affected individuals.
24
00:01:23,030 --> 00:01:25,460
And this is a really common characteristic
25
00:01:25,460 --> 00:01:28,290
of a dominant condition.
26
00:01:28,290 --> 00:01:30,560
We don't know, based on this pedigree,
27
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:35,480
whether it is autosomal dominant or X-linked dominant.
28
00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:39,630
Autosomal means any chromosome that's not the X chromosome.
29
00:01:39,630 --> 00:01:42,200
So for most conditions that are dominant conditions,
30
00:01:42,200 --> 00:01:44,930
they are autosomal, just because the vast majority of our genes
31
00:01:44,930 --> 00:01:48,680
are not located on the X chromosome.
32
00:01:48,680 --> 00:01:50,750
But there's nothing per se here that would
33
00:01:50,750 --> 00:01:54,710
exclude the possibility that this is an X-linked condition.
34
00:01:54,710 --> 00:01:58,400
But clearly, it is a dominant condition,
35
00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:03,020
again, because we're seeing it really in every generation.
36
00:02:03,020 --> 00:02:05,690
37
00:02:05,690 --> 00:02:08,900
We're also seeing that, on average,
38
00:02:08,900 --> 00:02:12,140
if you have this condition, about half of your children
39
00:02:12,140 --> 00:02:14,180
have this condition, which is also
40
00:02:14,180 --> 00:02:16,260
characteristic of a dominant condition.
41
00:02:16,260 --> 00:02:19,820
So if you have one allele that's conferring this phenotype,
42
00:02:19,820 --> 00:02:22,970
then you'd expect there's a 50% chance that your child is
43
00:02:22,970 --> 00:02:25,100
going to inherit this allele.
44
00:02:25,100 --> 00:02:30,060
And if they inherit this allele, then they're
45
00:02:30,060 --> 00:02:32,020
going to be affected by, in general,
46
00:02:32,020 --> 00:02:34,044
this dominant condition.
47
00:02:34,044 --> 00:02:36,710
48
00:02:36,710 --> 00:02:41,200
So here's another interesting situation.
49
00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:43,960
This is another inheritance pattern
50
00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:47,650
that looks to be a dominant inheritance pattern.
51
00:02:47,650 --> 00:02:50,510
And this is actually myostatin deficiency,
52
00:02:50,510 --> 00:02:52,660
which is very rare in people.
53
00:02:52,660 --> 00:02:57,790
So this pedigree actually was from a paper that included
54
00:02:57,790 --> 00:02:58,900
the picture on the top.
55
00:02:58,900 --> 00:03:00,790
And those arrows are pointing out
56
00:03:00,790 --> 00:03:07,360
areas of substantial musculature in basically a neonate,
57
00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:10,760
a newborn baby and a young child.
58
00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:13,870
So really hypergrowth of musculature.
59
00:03:13,870 --> 00:03:15,700
The inheritance here is actually curious.
60
00:03:15,700 --> 00:03:18,520
I won't go into it significantly,
61
00:03:18,520 --> 00:03:20,920
but this condition actually in this family
62
00:03:20,920 --> 00:03:24,940
appears in homozygotes and heterozygotes.
63
00:03:24,940 --> 00:03:28,720
So it appears to be dominant, and the severity is probably--
64
00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:32,230
increased severity means the magnitude of the phenotype
65
00:03:32,230 --> 00:03:36,430
is increased in homozygotes, like this person
66
00:03:36,430 --> 00:03:39,370
at the bottom here.
67
00:03:39,370 --> 00:03:39,870
All right.
68
00:03:39,870 --> 00:03:46,340
So in terms of autosomal dominant or dominant
69
00:03:46,340 --> 00:03:48,340
conditions-- we'll just say autosomal dominant--
70
00:03:48,340 --> 00:03:57,280
71
00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:02,755
affected individuals generally have affected parents.
72
00:04:02,755 --> 00:04:18,920
73
00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:21,339
And so there are a couple of conditions and situations
74
00:04:21,339 --> 00:04:22,550
in which this doesn't apply.
75
00:04:22,550 --> 00:04:26,470
One is that if there is what we say incomplete penetrance,
76
00:04:26,470 --> 00:04:28,610
meaning you don't always see the phenotype.
77
00:04:28,610 --> 00:04:31,123
So in general, when we talk about pedigrees,
78
00:04:31,123 --> 00:04:33,040
we'll say is there complete penetrance or not,
79
00:04:33,040 --> 00:04:35,440
meaning do you always see the phenotype
80
00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:38,800
if the person has that allele.
81
00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:40,960
But sometimes the phenotypes are difficult to see,
82
00:04:40,960 --> 00:04:42,510
and so you don't always characterize
83
00:04:42,510 --> 00:04:46,990
in a family history, whether somebody is affected or not.
84
00:04:46,990 --> 00:04:56,230
And also, this is unless there is a new mutation.
85
00:04:56,230 --> 00:05:00,830
86
00:05:00,830 --> 00:05:02,990
And so if there's not a new mutation,
87
00:05:02,990 --> 00:05:07,550
generally you see every generation has this phenotype.
88
00:05:07,550 --> 00:05:11,630
There are conditions that are characterized by new mutations.
89
00:05:11,630 --> 00:05:14,920
For example, the condition achondroplasia,
90
00:05:14,920 --> 00:05:21,590
achondroplasia is the most common etiology of
91
00:05:21,590 --> 00:05:23,960
or manifestation of short stature.
92
00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:27,050
So for little people, little people in general
93
00:05:27,050 --> 00:05:31,010
have alterations in long bone growth
94
00:05:31,010 --> 00:05:35,330
that we call achondroplasia, caused by a dominant mutation.
95
00:05:35,330 --> 00:05:38,270
This dominant mutation generally is a new mutation.
96
00:05:38,270 --> 00:05:40,040
So there's really a high frequency
97
00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:42,510
of new mutations appearing in populations.
98
00:05:42,510 --> 00:05:47,210
So more cases of achondroplasia occur by new mutations
99
00:05:47,210 --> 00:05:51,020
than they do via inheritance from parents,
100
00:05:51,020 --> 00:05:53,960
although that inheritance clearly happens.
101
00:05:53,960 --> 00:05:56,960
102
00:05:56,960 --> 00:06:08,150
And if a parent is affected, generally one half
103
00:06:08,150 --> 00:06:18,500
of the children are affected.
104
00:06:18,500 --> 00:06:19,000
7686
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.