Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
MICHAEL HEMANN: How do we use SNPs to do mapping?
OK, so let's just look at--
here, let's look again at a repeat length polymorphism,
so an SSR.
In a sense, we can use them interchangeable.
We'll talk for convenience sake about an SSR.
So, again, we have a gel and on this agarose gel
we have three lanes, and say we have some marker--
we have two markers--
marker lengths.
So we have a length A, we have a length B.
And so you can start with a homozygous individual that
has two copies of A, so they only show one band.
And another individual that has two copies of B
and so they only show that B band,
and they can have offspring that are AB.
So with markers-- and this is actually going to carry forward
into lectures next week--
there are a couple critical requirements
for getting what we call informative data from crosses.
So if we think about requirements for mapping
with DNA markers.
OK?
So the first requirement is the parent
with the phenotype has to be heterozygous for the marker.
So there's some phenotype that we care about
that we want to map, and that parent has to be heterozygous
because we're going to look for the segregation
of a particular marker with the phenotype of interest.
And the only way we can do that is
if there are two different alleles of that marker
so that we can actually see, is it segregating with one
of these alleles or the other.
If they're the same allele, we don't get any information.
And the second is that we need to know
the marker or the marker allele, that each parent contributed.
So let's think of a couple crosses here.
So here we'll have two parents and two kids.
Same thing over here.
We have an affected mother and this affected mother is AB.
So already that satisfies the first criteria
that I set up, that the person that has the phenotype that we
care about is heterozygous for a marker that we're looking at.
And so say we cross with male that's AA--
this is a little bit like a test cross--
and we have two kids.
So in this case, for both of these kids,
do we know that the--
do we know the allele that they're
getting from each parent?
Do we know the marker allele that they're
getting from each parent?
Yes.
We do.
We know that this child--
both children, actually, inherited B
from the mother and A from the father.
So we'll call these informative.
And this is going to become really important when we're
talking more about human genetics, inheritance,
and start talking about LOD scores,
but they're informative.
So in this case, say we cross to an AB
and we have a child that is AA and a child that is AB.
In the case on the left, do we know
which allele came from each parent,
or which allele each parent contributed?
No?
Yeah.
So this gets a little bit more complicated.
So basically here we're seeing that we
don't know the identity of these A's, and in essence they're
identical to each other.
But we do know that each parent gave an A,
and so there we're going to say it's informative.
In this case, AB, it's noninformative.
And it's noninformative because we
have no idea which parent gave the A
and which parent gave the B, so there
we're a little bit clueless.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.