Original subtitles

Time.

We all wish we had more of it.

If only there was a way to escape it's bonds.

and travel through time as we pleased,

Back into the distant past

or hundreds of years into the future.

The greatest minds on earth have spent decades

trying to make this dream come true without success.

But now new science reveals strange paths

that may finally answer the question,

is time travel possible?

And if so, how will we do it?

Space, time, life itself.

The secrets of the cosmos lie through the wormhole.

♪ Through the Wormhole 1x03 ♪ Is Time Travel Possible? Original air date on June 23, 2010

-- sync, corrected by elderman -- -- for www.Addic7ed.Com --

in a way, every man, woman, and child on this earth

is a time traveler.

Like it or not, we're all being shot relentlessly forward,

making the journey from birth to death,

and there's no going back.

And there's no way of looking into the future.

Or is there?

What if we could travel back

to witness events in the distant past

or journey into the far future, see our destiny?

Just think what we might learn

if we could watch history unfold right before our eyes...

...Or what we could change in our own lives

if we had the chance?

For many, life's greatest sorrow is losing a loved one.

The time I spent with my grandmother when I was a child

helped make me the man I am today.

I often wish I could see my grandmother again,

or go back in time and show her who I am

and what I've become as an adult.

Seems like an impossible dream.

But is it?

Can science find a way

to tear down the walls between now and then?

Is time travel possible?

To find the answer,

we must first understand the nature of time.

And that's a lot harder than it sounds.

Steve Jefferts is an atomic scientist and master timekeeper.

We all, I think,

have some innate feeling that we understand time.

It flows past us.

Time goes on, we get older,

things that happened yesterday are not happening today,

et cetera.

But I don't think that any of us,

whether we're physicists who study time

or just somebody who lives his life

really, truly understands time.

Steve works at

the National institute of Standards and Technology

in Boulder, Colorado.

It's one of six labs around the world

that calculate coordinated universal time,

the official world time.

This tableful of lasers

is the NIST-F1 cesium fountain atomic clock.

Measuring the nuclear vibrations of atoms,

this clock ticks at 9 billion times per second.

That's one ten-millionth of a nanosecond.

This clock will measure frequency, or time interval,

out to almost 16 digits.

Why is that important?

The reasons to measure time or frequency this accurately --

boy, there are a bunch of them.

Some of them are scientific,

but some of them are really practical.

Systems like the global positioning system,

the GPS system --

it's fundamentally a time-keeping system.

And so what we do is we put atomic clocks on satellites,

make sure they're all synchronized,

and now I stand on the surface of the earth

with my GPS receiver,

and it gets time signals from each of these satellites,

and it just measures the arrival times.

And so if the signal from that satellite

arrives five nanoseconds before the signal from that satellite,

it says, "oh, I must be 5 feet further from that satellite

than that satellite."

So it does that with four satellites,

and it computes your "x" and "y" position and your altitude,

and now you've got your position from time.

And the fact that this works at all is just remarkable,

but it absolutely depends on

having time at the nanosecond level,

because if you don't have time at the nanosecond level,

then you can't tell which satellite you're closer to.

Precision timekeeping like this makes our high-tech,

computer-driven lifestyles possible.

But as our timekeeping systems become ever-more accurate,

we find that time does not flow the way we think it does.

Time is not universal.

The strange truth is that time is personal.

What time is it?

Well, that depends on where you are

and what the ground beneath your feet is doing.

Anytime you put a clock in a gravitational field,

as you get closer to the strong part of the gravitational field,

the clock slows down.

What ends up happening is that the earth is not rigid.

The earth is sort of a squishy, firm ball of jello or something,

and every day, when the tides go in and out,

the earth deforms sort of like a ball,

and the earth under your foot

goes up and down by a foot more or less --

depends on where on the earth you are.

So if I pick this clock up and move it up by a foot,

it's further from the center of the Earth,

the gravitational force goes down a little bit,

and the clock ticks a little bit faster.

So now if you have a clock which is accurate to 17 digits,

all of a sudden, every day,

you can see the rate of the clock speed up and slow down

and speed up and slow down relative to what it should be,

because the Earth is squishing by this kind of one-foot level.

Humans don't perceive these miniscule time differences,

but our very fastest clocks

can cut a second into a quadrillion pieces.

And at that scale,

we see that time differs from place to place.

Time and space are tightly locked together.

Quickly, we're getting to the point

where we're gonna have to start thinking about

space-time together, rather than space and time,

which is a cool place to be, right?

Gravity slows time,

and this is the key to one form of time travel.

When you leave a gravity field such as the earth's surface,

time moves at a different rate for you

than for your friends on earth.

The time difference is greatest when you move at high speed.

This means that time travelers walk among us.

These are their time machines.

Cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev is the world's greatest time traveler.

Krikalev has spent 803 days moving at 17,000 miles per hour.

He traveled fast outside earth's gravity,

so time moved more slowly for him than for us.

Because time passed at different rates,

he has traveled into the future --

1/48 of a second into the future.

1/48 of a second may not sound like much,

but stick more power behind him and make him go faster,

near light speed -- about 670 million miles per hour --

and things get strange.

If he travels for a year,

he'll come back and find out

that while he has aged 12 months,

earth is 10 years older.

Here is another time machine,

and it speeds things up even faster than our rocket ships.

It's Europe's Large Hadron Collider, or LHC,

the world's biggest and baddest particle accelerator.

Steve Nahn is a Professor of physics at M.I.T.

Using the LHC, Nahn and thousands of other scientists

turn pieces of atoms into time travelers.

They take protons,

accelerate them to nearly the speed of light,

then smash them together.

The subatomic particles that come out of the explosions

only live for about a billionth of a second.

But in the LHC, that billionth of a second

is stretched out relative to our time.

The LHC here at CERN is like a time machine

because of a funny feature of physics.

Velocity is not what you think it is.

Velocity at normal speeds is normal,

but at very, very high speeds, velocity has a maximum limit.

So the protons in the ring

are traveling near the speed of light,

and they can't go faster.

What happens instead

is that their clocks start moving slower.

Their ticks are longer than our ticks.

So in some sense, the protons that are going around the ring,

their clocks are moving slower than our clocks,

so they're like time travelers relative to us.

The time-travelling protons at CERN

show us that we, too, can travel far forward in time.

Decades from now,

spaceships traveling near the speed of light

could fly into the stars on a 10-year mission.

For the people onboard, it would be 10 years.

On earth, a thousand years would pass.

The astronauts would return to a far different future world.

Time travel into the future is possible.

But is it a one-way trip?

Can we make our dream

of time travel backwards and forwards come true?

With the right technology,

time-traveling spaceships could take us into the future.

But can we go against the era of time and journey into the past?

Well, it might not b be as hard as it sounds.

I mean, after all, the past is all around us.

Consider this.

The speed of light is 186,000 miles per second.

Why, that's awfully fast.

But when a piece of light travels from here to there,

it takes time.

And that means that everywhere you look,

you're looking back in time.

It takes one billionth of a second

for light to travel one foot.

So you see the person you're sitting next to

a billionth of a second in the past.

The light from the sun is eight minutes old when we see it.

And the deeper we gaze into the sky,

the farther we see back in time.

Satellites have photographed the edge of the universe,

13.7 billion light-years away.

That's 13.7 billion years back in time.

We always look into the past.

But it goes even deeper than that.

According to Einstein, time is just like space.

Since every bit of space exists here right now,

that means that every bit of time

exists right here right now, too.

Sean Carroll is a physicist

at the California institute of Technology.

Physicists tend to be eternalists.

They think that the whole universe,

the whole four-dimensional space-time in which we live,

is equally real.

We exist at different moments in this space-time continuum,

and we feel different things at different moments of time.

But it's not that the future is becoming real as time goes on.

It's just that the future exists

just as much as the past or the present.

We're discovering what happens in the future as time goes on.

But it's not becoming any more real

than the past is becoming real.

So we think that, in principle,

the past and the future exist just as much as the present.

The whole of time is all around us.

But can we jump from the present to the past?

In the early years of the 20th century,

a young patent clerk named Albert Einstein

gave us a possible way back.

Riding to work on a streetcar,

the barely 20-year-old Einstein looked up at a clock tower,

and suddenly it all clicked.

Einstein realized that time is relative to where you are

and how fast you're moving.

Time is the fourth dimension,

bound tightly together with length, width, and depth --

the dimensions of space.

A few years later, Einstein used his ideas

about gravity's effect on space and time

to create a mathematical map of the cosmos.

He proved that the fabric of space and time is curved.

If the universe is curved,

there might be ways to build bridges across it

or create loops inside of it,

loops that will allow time travel.

That was the conclusion reached in 1949

by the mathematical genius Kurt Gödel.

Gödel was a close friend of Einstein's,

and he decided to see

if the great man's equations permitted time travel.

He found that they did.

If the universe rotates on its axis

and you somehow remain perfectly still,

it would be possible

to go to any time and place in the universe --

an exciting discovery,

except that we now know that the universe does not rotate.

And without the rotation, you cannot have time travel.

Gödel's solution was unrealistic,

but his radical thinking

inspired a new generation of explorers.

Professor Frank Tipler was one of the renegade physicists

who followed in Gödel's footsteps.

I was fascinated by Gödel's paper,

which I had actually read when I was an undergraduate at MIT,

and I wondered if I could follow up Einstein's suggestion,

can this be actually done physically?

We can't rotate the universe -- it either is rotating or not --

but we might be able to do something on a smaller scale.

An obvious, easy-to-solve model in relativity

was a rotating cylinder.

And so I was able to show that a rotating cylinder

would give rise to these loops in time,

being able to go backwards into time.

Tipler's gigantic cylinder would hang in space,

whirling at nearly the speed of light.

Space turns into time and time into space

as both become twisted around the cylinder.

So by traveling forward around the cylinder,

you go backwards in time.

Time direction is this way,

but around a very rapidly rotating body,

you can go backwards into a spiral like this

and go backwards into time.

So my paper, which I tried to get published

under the title of "constructing a time machine,"

the editors thought that was a little too radical,

and they wanted something that would not be so sound-bitey,

and so I changed the title to "rotating cylinders

and the possibility of global causality violation."

Now, there is a mouthful that no one will catch on to

unless you actually read the paper.

But later, Tipler found

there are a few problems with his idea.

I realized that the rotating cylinder,

although an easy-to-construct solution

to the Einstein equations,

was not very realistic

because it had to be an infinite cylinder,

and creating an infinite cylinder

is as hard as creating a universe,

which, obviously, we cannot do.

So I was wondering if it would be possible

to have this sort of structure in a much smaller scale,

and I discovered, alas, that's not going to be possible.

Because if you tried

to speed up a body to generate the time machine,

what you would find

before the time-machine property was created,

you would rip a hole in space and time.

You would create a singularity right there in space and time.

So, alas, I had to give up my dream

of creating a time machine.

Tipler's spinning cylinder might not work,

but there are massive objects in the universe

that are already spinning near the speed of light --

black holes.

The immense gravity of black holes

push the laws of physics to the extremes.

Could the secrets of backwards time travel

lurk in their Stygian depths?

Black holes are small but incredibly massive objects

scattered throughout the universe.

The intense gravity of a black hole

warps the fabric of time and space

more than any other celestial object we know of.

Can the time-warping properties of black holes be harnessed?

Can we use them to travel through time?

Black holes are not time machines.

You would fall into a singularity,

and you'd be crushed, and you would die.

Some interesting effect that we don't yet understand

about what happens at the center of a black hole,

there's no reason to think

that it pushes you backward in time.

The black hole is more or less a one-way street.

You go in. You will never come back out.

So black holes won't work.

But another cosmic anomaly made famous by science fiction

might do the trick --

wormholes.

Wormholes are magic doorways connecting two remote locations.

These cosmic sky bridges

would allow us to jump across space and travel in time.

Fly into a wormhole,

and you can take a shortcut to another place or time.

We have no proof that wormholes exist,

but there is plenty of solid science behind them.

No one knows more about wormholes

than renowned physicist Kip Thorne.

For starters, he can tell you why they're called wormholes.

If you have an apple, a worm drills a hole through the apple,

reaches from one side to the other,

you can think of the surface of the apple

as being like our universe,

and the worm has gone through some higher dimension

to reach the other side.

If they exist, wormholes are smaller than atoms.

If we want to go through them,

we need to stretch them out and hold them open.

Prying open a wormhole

would take a tremendous amount of energy --

not just ordinary energy,

but something called negative energy.

Negative energy is antigravitational.

It repels the fabric of space and time

and would prevent gravity from crushing a wormhole.

One problem --

a lot of people don't believe negative energy exists.

The kind of energy that would antigravitate is ridiculous.

But in fact, in modern physics,

we know examples of negative energy

that are created in the laboratory every day --

small l amounts of negative energy, often just transient,

but nevertheless, negative energy.

And so I was not willing

to dismiss this possibility out of hand.

The fundamental question

was could a very advanced civilization

accumulate enough negative energy

and hold it in the interior of the wormhole

long enough to keep the wormhole open

so that somebody could travel through it.

The answer is we don't know.

Meanwhile, another renegade physicist

worked up a different way to harness

the time-warping effects of celestial phenomena.

Richard Gott has been studying the problem of time travel

for decades.

Gott's novel time machine

uses the heavy gravity surrounding cosmic strings

to create loops in time.

Cosmic strings are thin strands of energy

that may run through the universe.

There's a poem.

"There was a young lady named 'bright.'

"she traveled far faster than light.

"She left one day in a relative way,

and returned home the previous night."

The trouble is, Einstein also told you

that you can't build a spaceship

that goes faster than the speed of light.

But in general relativity,

which is theory of curved space-time,

if you take a shortcut, you can beat a light.

So this is what allows you to circle the cosmic strings

and, like miss Bright, visit an event in your own past.

And no one knows if cosmic strings are real.

But many physicists think they're out there --

pieces of high-density vacuum energy

left over from the big bang,

narrower than an atomic nucleus.

Some strings may be short. Some may be infinitely long.

But they all exert incredible gravity.

And where there's incredible gravity,

there's a chance of creating a shortcut across time and space.

So here's how to build a time machine using cosmic strings.

Now, you might think

that the geometry around a cosmic string

is flat like a piece of pizza.

But actually, because they have

a large mass per unit length in the string,

it really looks like a pizza with a slice missing.

So if I cut out a slice of pizza here, take it away,

and then I fold up the pizza so it's like a cone,

it looks like -- the pizza looks like a cone.

So if I was over here on planet "A,"

I can send a light beam to planet "B."

But I could get on a spaceship,

and I could go slower than the speed of light

and travel over here across this shortcut,

and I can get there ahead of the light beam.

And what that means is that my departure and my arrival

are separated by more distance in space than distance in time.

In other words, this might be four light-years in distance

and only three years in time.

So then what you could do

is I could cut out another missing pizza slice here,

and now I've got two cosmic strings.

And then fold it up like a boat.

That's what space-time

around the two cosmic strings looks like.

So then what I can do

is if I circle the two cosmic strings with my spaceship,

I can arrive back to planet "A" at noon.

Now, planet "A" at noon is the same time and the same place.

So I can come back and shake hands with myself as I departed.

So my older self can come back, and I can see myself off.

This is me visiting an event in my own past.

That's real time travel to the past.

But, once again, there are one or two problems with this.

For starters,

when you push two cosmic strings together at high speed,

it may create a black hole.

You may be killed after doing the time travel,

or you could be killed

before you even complete the time travel.

The other thing is that this loop

would weigh about maybe half the mass of our galaxy

if you wanted to travel back in time a year.

And so this is a project

that only supercivilizations could attempt.

It's far beyond what we're able to do.

Physicists like Gott

don't claim they can build working time machines today.

They're trying to figure out

whether the laws of physics permit time travel at all.

There are several inherent problems in all scenarios

for building time machines.

And that is that nature appears to have a driving force

that may always cause a time machine to self-destruct

at the moment you try to activate it.

The answer as to whether you can get around it

is held tightly in the grips, we believe,

of the laws of quantum gravity --

laws that we don't yet understand.

We know how gravity affects large objects like people,

our planet, and the stars in the sky.

We don't understand how it works

deep down at the quantum level --

the supersmall domain of waves and particles.

But not understanding something

has never stopped people from experimenting.

Right now, another group of explorers

hunt for answers to the mystery of time travel

in perhaps the least likely place --

deep inside the heart of the atom.

It seems that time travel is next to impossible

in Einstein's world of space and time.

But there's another world and another kind of physics

where Einstein's rational rules don't always apply.

It's the world deep inside the atom,

where the weird laws of quantum mechanics take hold.

Now, don't be scared.

This is strange but fascinating stuff.

Quantum mechanics is just the idea

that what exists is much richer than what you can observe.

So when you look at a particle, you see it in one place.

Quantum mechanics says that when you're not looking at it,

that particle exists all over the place.

Maybe it's more likely

that you'll see it one place or another,

but there's really a spectrum of possibilities

for where you will see the particle.

So when you combine the ideas of quantum mechanics

with the ideas of time travel, all hell breaks loose.

One of the strangest properties of quantum mechanics

is called "nonlocality."

It's when two particles instantly affect each other,

even when they're miles or light-years apart.

It's a bit like voodoo.

When you stab the doll, the human being is also affected.

But unlike voodoo,

quantum nonlocality is scientifically proven.

Today, Swiss banks fund experiments

to see if nonlocality can be used

to make one-of-a-kind, crack-proof security keys

for computer transactions.

Professor Nicolas Gisin leads the way.

A quantum physicist and fiber-optic specialist,

Gisin has tested quantum nonlocality

by showing the perfect synchronization of photons,

particles of light, separated by great distances.

Quantum physics says, well, what happens

is that whenever you do something on one photon,

the reaction is not on this photon only,

but there's a global reaction of two photons.

In some sense, the two photons,

although they are at this large distance,

they still constitute one system.

And so the global system reacts at once.

And this is quantum nonlocality.

Gisin sends photon signals

through fiber-optic cables stretched across Geneva.

A pair of photons on one end is activated with a laser.

And the photons on the other end instantly react.

Nothing seems to move, and no energy is exchanged.

Yet somehow, the particles share information.

Einstein used the word "spooky action at a distance."

Sohis spooky action at a distance

is not something that travels in space-time.

It's not something that happens in space-time.

There's no story in space-time

that can tell us how these nonlocal correlations happen,

and that's why we conclude

that they seem to emerge somehow from outside space-time.

So that has, of course, deep implication

for our understanding of space-time

or actually, more precisely,

for our non-understanding of space-time.

Some believe that quantum nonlocality

can be used to send messages backward in time.

At the University of Washington,

physicist John Cramer is putting this idea to the test.

Like Gisin, he's experimenting with entangled photons --

photons bound by nonlocality.

The twist is that Cramer is trying to send photon signals

from the present back to the very recent past.

These custom-made lasers and measuring devices,

called interferometers,

are the heart of Cramer's time machine.

One interferometer called "Alice"

sends photon signals to another interferometer called "Bob."

If Cramer's theory is correct

and the calibration is just right,

Bob will get a message from Alice

a fraction of a second before she sends it.

Cause and effect will be reversed.

So Alice has control

over whether we have particle-like behavior

or wavelike behavior over here.

Because the photons are entangled in space,

Bob, who wants to receive the signal over here,

can look and see

whether he has an interference pattern at the same time.

Now, this distance is a few centimeters.

It's not very big.

But it doesn't have to be a few centimeters.

This could be a light-year down the line,

and she could still do the same thing

and cause the same effect over here.

And that's the way entanglement works.

And so if I put a spool of fiber optics in here

that's, say, 10 kilometers long, then she would send the signal

50 microseconds after Bob received it.

So she would be sending messages backwards in time

by 50 microseconds.

So one could use it, in principle,

for backwards-in-time communication.

If Cramer's device works,

it will only send messages back

a millionth of a second before they're sent,

but a signal showing itself even a tiny bit in the past

would revolutionize our understanding of time.

It would prove that retrocausality,

the theory that events in the future

affect events in the past, is true.

If it does work, it would be quite remarkable,

be a big deal in physics.

It would be a big deal in the communication industry.

And if you could send messages backwards in time,

it would be a big deal everywhere.

It would change our civilization

in ways I have trouble imagining.

But all of that is probably just an indication

that the experiment probably won't work,

because nature probably doesn't want to allow you

to send messages backwards in time.

I don't really see retrocausality

as a very plausible assumption.

I mean, time clearly evolves or gets constructed

towards the future.

On the other side, I will also say

that time is certainly a very poorly understood concept

in physics by physicists today,

and one can certainly expect that in the future

we'll have a much better and deeper understanding of time

and possibly a very different one from the one we have today.

So let's say that someday

we develop that better understanding of time.

After solving the riddle of quantum gravity,

we build a working time machine.

What would happen then?

Would we be able to change the past?

The answers are fantastic, disturbing,

and a little...

...Strange. ...Strange. ...Strange. ...Strange.

We're trying to send signals back in time.

And if that works,

perhaps one day we can send humans back in time.

An exciting idea,

but it opens the door to the problem of paradox.

A paradox is a situation that contradicts itself --

doesn't make any sense.

Say you send a cure for cancer from the future to the past.

Would the dead now be alive?

See?

Time travel is filled with such mysteries.

The things we would like to understand about time travel

are, one, is it possible, even in principle,

that the laws of physics permit backward time travel?

We don't know the answer.

We need the laws of quantum gravity

in order to find out the answer.

Second question is, if backward time travel is possible,

then what does nature do

about the so-called grandfather paradox,

that I can go backward in time if it's possible

and kill my grandfather before my father was conceived,

thereby changing history so that I no longer exist?

What does nature do about that?

The conservative interpretation

is that space-time is one four-dimensional thing.

It doesn't change.

So if time travelers go to the past,

they were always part of the past, and they don't change it.

In other words, if you had time travelers aboard the Titanic,

they might have warned the Captain about the iceberg,

but he didn't pay any attention to them,

like he didn't pay any attention to the other iceberg warnings,

because we know the ship ended up hitting an iceberg.

So that's the conservative view,

that time travelers don't alter the past.

They can participate in the past.

In fact, one wag once said

that the real thing that sank the Titanic

was the extra weight of all the stowaway time travelers

Onboard to see it sink.

In fact, there's a simple reason we aren't surrounded

by time-traveling tourists from the future.

It's because no one has built a working time machine.

Even if we someday

have the technology to travel back in time,

the machine will only work

starting at the point we invent it,

creating the first loop in time.

When you create a time machine

by moving cosmic strings up in the year 3000,

you create a time loop up in the year 3000

by twisting space and time.

So when the time traveler goes,

he goes always toward the future, like this car.

He goes around the loop,

and that means that he can go from the year 3002

back to the year 3001,

but he can't come back here to 2010,

because that's before the time machine was built.

But there may be an exception to these rules.

And, once again,

it grows out of the weird world of quantum mechanics.

Many quantum physicists believe

there is an incalculable number of parallel universes,

and these parallel universes are all around us.

Every time you make a decision that could have gone

one way or the other -- you flip a coin, for example --

it could have gone the other way,

and then the universe would branch off

into two separate branches

in the many-worlds theory of quantum mechanics.

If you allow for alternate universes,

then lots of things can happen.

It's still true that you have to avoid logical paradoxes.

It's still true that what happened did happen,

but it means that what happened in one universe

happened in that universe.

It doesn't apply to the new universe.

If the many worlds exist,

which they do, according to quantum mechanics,

then what you would do

is you go back to kill your grandfather,

you kill a man who is identical to your grandfather,

but he is only your grandfather in a parallel world.

In that parallel world,

your grandfather being killed by you from another universe

is never going to give rise to your father, hence to you.

But that's no problem,

because you have never existed at all in this universe.

What you've done in your time machine is cross the universes.

But there seems to be little chance

of time traveling anytime soon,

either into the existing past or a parallel universe.

The technology that would be required to make a time machine

that has even a whisper of a hope of success

is as far beyond us today

as space travel is beyond the capabilities of an amoeba,

because our technology is so puny.

There's no hope at all.

Time travel seems unlikely if we approach it purely as a matter

of taking a person or information from the present

and transporting it to the past.

But there is another way to journey into the past,

a way that until recently

would have been considered preposterous

but is getting closer to reality every day.

We could build the past.

Human technology is evolving exponentially.

When our computers get powerful enough,

they could simulate massively complex worlds,

including past eras of life on Earth.

These wouldn't be video games.

These simulations of the past would look and feel so real,

you wouldn't know they are simulations --

not the genuine past, but the next-best thing.

If you really want to go into the past,

you're going to have to go into the extreme far future.

In the extreme far future,

they will have the ability to reproduce the past.

And then you can see what the past was like.

You can actually experience the distant past

by existing in the virtual reality

of the computers of the far future.

We've seen that time travel into the distant future is possible.

But it's a one-way trip.

Time travel into the past might be theoretically possible,

but it requires inconceivable amounts of energy

and god-like technology.

Our best hope may lie

in computer re-creations of times past.

So it looks like we won't be able to go back in time

to visit the people we've lost

or correct the mistakes we made when we were young.

Our trajectory through time, from birth to death,

is the one thing all living things have in common.

Every human has to live with the fact

that life is short and time is precious.

We have our triumphs. We make our mistakes.

If we could go back and correct those mistakes,

would we ever learn anything from them?

Would we be the people we are today?

For now, at least, we can't turn back the clock.

But...We'll keep trying.

We will keep trying.

-- sync, corrected by elderman -- -- for www.Addic7ed.Com --